Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Non-equilibrium Ion Transport in a Hybrid Battery Material

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that charge storage in the Prussian blue analogue cathode K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] is governed by non-equilibrium phase transformations caused by framework flexibility, not by coherency-strain physics.

desk verdict A careful operando study of a PBA cathode with a convincing broad non-equilibrium story, but the headline intra-crystallite mechanism for the first plateau is under-supported and needs direct single-particle evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04587 v1 pith:YL5PUV3Q submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords non-equilibriumiontransportPrussianblueanaloguespotassium-ionbatteriesoperandoX-raydiffractionK2Mn[Fe(CN)6]cathodeframeworkflexibilityJahn-Tellerstrainphasetransformationkinetics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that charge storage in the Prussian blue analogue cathode K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] is controlled by non-equilibrium phase transformations, of the kind previously seen in conventional cathodes like LiFePO4, but arising here for a different microscopic reason: the structural softness of the hybrid framework. Using operando X-ray absorption and diffraction, the authors track which phases are present at each state of charge and find that on the first voltage plateau the monoclinic-to-cubic conversion proceeds heterogeneously through each crystallite, because removing K-ions opens the framework and makes further removal easier in already-depleted regions. On the second plateau, the soft framework absorbs the strain of Jahn-Teller-active Mn3+ without promptly nucleating the tetragonal phase, so phase conversion lags behind charge. If correct, the mechanism turns framework flexibility from a passive structural feature into the variable that sets transport kinetics, and it identifies particle size, K content, and vacancy engineering as the levers for improving rate capability in PBAs and related hybrids.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the coupling between K-ion content and framework geometry. In the potassiated state, a cooperative K-ion slide distortion collapses the framework around K+ and pins the ions; as K+ leaves, the framework opens, mobility rises, and extraction accelerates in already-depleted regions, yielding autocatalytic heterogeneous conversion on the first plateau. The second mechanism is elastic compliance: the soft molecular framework absorbs Jahn-Teller strain from Mn3+ without nucleating the tetragonal phase, so strain must build up before phase-boundary motion proceeds. Together, composition-dependent mobility and strain accommodation turn what should be a solid-solution o

What would settle it

A spatially resolved measurement of a single K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] crystallite during charge—nano-diffraction, scanning X-ray microscopy, or in situ transmission electron microscopy—would show whether a K-poor shell forms around a K-rich core (supporting the paper's picture) or whether composition varies from particle to particle instead (refuting the intra-crystallite claim). A second test: cycle the cell at much lower rates; if the mechanism is kinetically controlled, the monoclinic phase should survive closer to the equilibrium composition x ≈ 0.45 and the cubic-to-tetragonal lag should shrink.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that charging K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] proceeds by two kinetically controlled, non-equilibrium phase conversions rather than the equilibrium single-phase sequence. On the first plateau, K+ extraction is autocatalytic: removing ions opens the collapsed monoclinic framework, raising local K+ mobility, so further extraction is favored in depleted regions and the monoclinic-to-cubic conversion is gradual and heterogeneous inside each crystallite. On the second plateau, the Jahn-Teller-driven cubic-to-tetragonal conversion lags far behind state of charge because the soft framework absorbs accumulating strain instead of propagating a phase boundary, with conversion

Load-bearing premise

The gradual phase-fraction curves from powder diffraction are read as a shell-and-core transformation inside every crystallite, but they could equally come from a mix of fast- and slow-reacting particles; the paper has no single-particle or spatially resolved measurement to exclude that, and leans on analogy to Ni-rich layered oxides.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PBA cathode optimisation should target the framework itself: lower initial K+ content, smaller transition metals, or low-level Cs+ doping would stabilise the cubic phase and speed the first plateau, at a cost in specific energy.
  • Smaller particles help the second plateau by accelerating cubic-to-tetragonal conversion and improving reversibility, but they increase the fraction of hard-to-extract K+ sites on the first plateau—so particle-size effects are direction-dependent.
  • The non-equilibrium lens extends to other hybrid materials sharing PBA-like compliance: other PBA cathodes such as Na2Fe[Fe(CN)6], metal-organic frameworks with guest-driven phase transitions, and hybrid perovskite photovoltaics where ion diffusion and strain localisation couple.
  • Controlling hexacyanometallate vacancy correlations is identified as the route to stabilise the undistorted cubic phase at low vacancy fractions, preserving high capacity while avoiding multi-phase cycling.
  • The contrast with LiFePO4 is inverted: stiff frameworks propagate phase-boundary waves and aid diffusion, whereas soft frameworks hamper ion transport by slowing phase transformation—consistent with the superior rate capability of solid-solution high-vacancy PBAs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the autocatalytic picture is right, the apparent K+ diffusion coefficient should rise with depth of charge on the first plateau; a single-particle operando measurement (nano-diffraction or scanning X-ray microscopy of one crystallite) would test the intra-crystallite gradient directly.
  • If the strain-limited second plateau is the bottleneck, mechanically stiffening the cathode—composite electrodes, coatings, or framework cross-linking—could improve rate capability without changing composition; the paper does not explore this.
  • The non-equilibrium picture predicts a rate-dependent phase sequence: at very low currents the monoclinic phase should persist toward the equilibrium composition (x ≈ 0.45) and the tetragonal lag should shrink; a rate series would quantify how far from equilibrium the mechanism sits.
  • The authors' logic inverts a design habit from stiff ceramics: for flexible hybrids, raising elastic modulus may restore the thermodynamic driving force for phase-boundary motion, so stiffness could be a rate-capability lever rather than an enemy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an operando XAS/XRD study of the K-ion cathode K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] during the first charge. On the first plateau, Rietveld-refined phase fractions show a continuous, coupled monoclinic-to-cubic conversion starting early in charge, in contrast to an abrupt equilibrium transformation expected from the chemically prepared phase diagram. The authors attribute this to kinetically controlled K-ion extraction with a composition-dependent mobility that creates intra-crystallite ('core-shell') heterogeneity, by analogy to Ni-rich NMC. On the second plateau, the tetragonal phase emerges late and lags the charge state; the authors interpret this as strain-limited phase-boundary propagation due to the soft framework. The paper concludes that non-equilibrium transformation mechanisms in this hybrid material arise from framework flexibility rather than from the coherency-strain physics of LiFePO4.

Significance. The reported operando dataset and phase-fraction analysis are a useful contribution, and the MMF treatment of the XAS data provides an independent normalisation of state of charge. If the mechanism is correct, the work would extend kinetic transformation concepts to PBAs and flexible frameworks and identify practical optimisation levers (particle size, Cs doping, vacancy engineering). However, the central evidence for intra-crystallite heterogeneity is indirect: no single-particle or spatially resolved measurement is presented, and the auxiliary 'simple model' is not described in the main text and may be fitted to the same data it claims to capture. The conclusions are plausible but not yet established at the microscopic level claimed.

major comments (3)
  1. [First charge plateau, Fig. 3a,c] The claim that 'phase transformation occurs heterogeneously throughout PBA crystallites' is load-bearing but not directly evidenced. The operando XRD phase fractions are ensemble-averaged; an equally viable explanation is inter-particle heterogeneity (particle size, crystallinity, current distribution, contact resistance). The text explicitly says the interpretation 'is based on similar behaviour reported for Ni-rich NMC cathodes' (Ref. 12), not on single-particle observation. Please provide direct spatial/single-particle evidence, or substantially rephrase the mechanistic claim as one of inter-particle kinetic heterogeneity, or add a model that discriminates the two mechanisms from the ensemble data.
  2. [Supplementary 'simple model' / Fig. 3a] The model that 'captures surprisingly well' the phase-fraction evolution is not described in the main text; no equations, parameter values, or uniqueness/independence analysis are given. If the composition-dependent K-ion mobility function was chosen or fitted to reproduce the same operando phase fractions, the agreement is not an independent validation. Please include the model formulation and show whether it can be falsified by, for example, lattice-parameter profiles, particle-size dependence, or relaxation experiments.
  3. [Second charge plateau, Fig. 4] The interpretation of the second plateau as strain-limited phase-boundary propagation is plausible, but the evidence is indirect: phase fractions lag charge state and lattice parameters change (Fig. S9), yet no direct measurement of strain, stress, or phase-boundary velocity is provided. A quantitative model, or at least an order-of-magnitude estimate of strain energy versus driving force, is needed to support the conclusion that low elastic moduli, rather than slow bulk diffusion or interfacial kinetics, are the limiting factor.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] Typographical errors: 'non-equilbrium' (p. 7), 'flexiblity' (p. 3), and 'LiFeO4' should presumably be 'LiFePO4' (p. 4).
  2. [Fig. 2c] The film plot colour scale and the relationship between patterns and state of charge are not fully explained; a colour bar and explicit axis labels would improve readability.
  3. [Main text / SI] The 'simple model' is relegated to the SI without even a brief summary in the main text. Since it is used to support a central mechanistic claim, a concise description (including the mobility function and any fitted parameters) should appear in the main text.
  4. [First charge plateau, p. 3] The claim of 'well-separated monolithic particles' is used to justify neglecting morphology effects, but no SEM/TEM or particle-size distribution is shown in the main text. Please add the characterisation or soften the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No substantiated circularity: the central claims are grounded in new operando XAS/XRD data; the SI-only simple model and intra-crystallite interpretation are evidentiary caveats, not demonstrated constructional circularity.

full rationale

The paper's core result—that K2Mn[Fe(CN)6] charges via non-equilibrium, kinetically controlled phase transformations—is built from fresh operando XAS and XRD measurements. The MMF decomposition of XAS spectra, the Rietveld-type refinement of XRD phase fractions, and the capacity-to-x normalization are independent data-processing steps, not definitions of the conclusions. The equilibrium phase diagram and strain maps imported from prior work (including the authors' own Ref. 30, 33, 41) are empirical baselines from separately prepared samples; they supply context and contrast, but the non-equilibrium claim is established by the measured departure of the operando phase fractions from those baselines, not by the citations themselves. The 'simple model' capturing the first-plateau phase-fraction evolution is described only in the supplementary materials, and the main text does not exhibit model parameters or fitting procedure; without that information, no reduction of the prediction to the fitted data can be demonstrated from the text alone. Likewise, interpreting the ensemble phase-fraction profile as intra-crystallite heterogeneity relies on analogy to Ni-rich NMC (Ref. 12) and is underdetermined by ensemble data—an inter-particle distribution could also produce gradual conversion—but that is a limitation of evidence, not circularity. No equation or definition in the paper equates an output to an input, and no load-bearing premise is justified solely by an unverified self-citation. The paper is therefore best assessed as self-contained against its own measurements, with a legitimate concern about model transparency and mechanistic uniqueness that lies outside the circularity construct.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on the equilibrium phase diagram from chemically prepared samples (mostly the authors' own prior work), the assumption that operando XAS/XRD can be decomposed into three fixed species, the core-shell interpretation via analogy to NMC, and a composition-dependent mobility model deferred to the supplementary. No new material constants are derived; the only fitted component is the mobility model, whose parameters are not stated in the main text.

free parameters (1)
  • composition-dependent K-ion mobility function in the simple model = not stated in main text (supplementary)
    The 'simple model' used to reproduce the phase-fraction evolution in Fig. 3a must specify how K-ion mobility depends on local K concentration; if its parameters are chosen to match the observed phase fractions, the agreement is a fit rather than a prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The equilibrium phase diagram of K2-xMn[Fe(CN)6] from chemically prepared samples (refs 30, 41) is the correct baseline for comparing electrochemically driven transformations.
    The paper defines non-equilibrium by departure from this diagram (Fig. 1b); if chemical preparation also freezes in non-equilibrium phases, the comparison is weakened. The diagram comes partly from the authors' own prior work.
  • domain assumption Operando Mn K-edge XAS spectra can be separated into exactly three fixed components (pristine, intermediate, fully charged) by Metropolis matrix factorisation.
    The MMF decomposition assumes the spectra are linear combinations of the three end-member species and that these species do not themselves evolve with state of charge.
  • domain assumption Constrained Rietveld/Pawley refinements of operando XRD patterns provide reliable phase fractions and lattice parameters; the intermediate cubic phase can absorb Mn3+ with continuously changing composition and lattice parameter within its stability field.
    The second-plateau interpretation (phase fractions not matching charge state, accommodation of Mn3+ in cubic phase) depends on the validity of the constrained refinement model and the strain accommodation assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The gradual phase conversion observed in ensemble XRD is caused by intra-crystallite, core-shell heterogeneity (as in Ni-rich NMC, ref 12), not by inter-particle variations.
    No single-particle or spatially resolved measurement is shown; the core-shell pathway is inferred by analogy, and this is the load-bearing premise for the 'heterogeneous within crystallites' claim.
  • ad hoc to paper K-ion mobility increases as K content decreases because the framework opens (the 'simple model' assumption).
    This composition-dependent mobility is the mechanism put into the simple model used to reproduce Fig. 3a; the model equations and parameters are only in the supplementary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-equilibrium Ion Transport in a Hybrid Battery Material." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YL5PUV3Q

@misc{pith2026250904587,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-equilibrium Ion Transport in a Hybrid Battery Material},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YL5PUV3Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04587}
}
read the original abstract

Hybrid materials, which combine inorganic and molecular components, often exhibit structural flexibility that enables unusual functional responses. Among them, Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) are a promising class for post-lithium battery technologies. Here, we show that non-equilibrium transformation processes govern the charge-storage mechanism of a PBA electrode, K2Mn[Fe(CN)6]. Ostensibly, this behavior mirrors that observed in high-rate cycling of conventional cathodes such as LiFePO4, yet arises here for fundamentally different reasons -- namely, low elastic moduli and cooperative distortions inherent to the hybrid framework. Using \emph{operando} methods, we show that framework flexibility limits transport kinetics and promotes collective, metastable pathways. Our results highlight new directions for PBA cathode optimisation, but also suggest a broader relevance of non-equilibrium mechanisms for mass transport in hybrid materials beyond PBAs alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04587 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structures of K2−xMn[Fe(CN)6] via chemical and electrochemical preparation. (a) Schematic 2-dimensional rep￾resentation of the three PBA phases present during electrochemical cycling. In the JT distorted Mn[Fe(CN)6] arrows included to represent the anisotropy due to JT-active Mn. K are shown as amber spheres, FeC6 are shown as dark blue octahedra with black nodes and MnN6 as brown octahedra with light blue nodes. (b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Operando characterisation of the K2−xMn[Fe(CN)6] cathode. (a) Normalised XAS profile for the Mn K-edge with selected curves offset vertically by a constant amount and coloured by state of charge. (b) MMF phase fractions for the fixed MMF refinement of the XAS data. The pristine spectrum is in amber, the intermediate spectrum in pink and the Mn(III) component in dark blue. The shaded region is extrapolated to match u… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Operando XRD analysis of K2−xMn[Fe(CN)6] first charge plateau. (a) XRD refinement phase fractions as compared to the predicted phases from equilibrium and non-equilibrium simulations. (b) Schematic structural representation of the effect of opening the framework windows on K-ion transport when the monoclinic phase transforms into the cubic phase. (c) Evolution of coherent scattering domains with K-ion extraction in … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Operando XRD analysis of the high voltage plateau. (a) XRD refinement phase fractions are plotted as a function of state of charge. Using the strain map from Ref. 41, the strain of the incumbent phase can be visualised based on necessary change in K-ion occupancy. (b) …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bazant, M. Z. Theory of chemical kinetics and charge transfer based on nonequilibrium thermody- namics. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1144–1160 (2013)

  2. [2]

    & Zausch, J

    Latz, A. & Zausch, J. Thermodynamic consistent transport theory of Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 196, 3296–3302 (2011)

  3. [3]

    Hatzell, K. B. et al. Challenges in Lithium Metal Anodes for Solid-State Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 922–934 (2020)

  4. [4]

    Cogswell, D. A. & Bazant, M. Z. Coherency Strain and the Kinetics of Phase Separation in LiFePO4 Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6, 2215–2225 (2012)

  5. [5]

    Physical Chemistry of Ionic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004)

    Maier, J. Physical Chemistry of Ionic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004)

  6. [6]

    Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase- separating battery electrodes

    Li, Y .et al. Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase- separating battery electrodes. Nat. Mater .13, 1149–1156 (2014)

  7. [7]

    Liu, H. et al. Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO 4 nanoparticle electrodes. Science 344, 1252817 (2014)

  8. [8]

    Lim, J. et al. Origin and hysteresis of lithium compositional spatiodynamics within battery primary particles. Science 353, 566–571 (2016)

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Gent, W. E. et al. Persistent State-of-Charge Heterogeniety in Relaxed, Partially Charged Li1−xNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 Secondary Particles. Adv. Mater .28, 6631–6638 (2016)

  2. [10]

    Grenier, A. et al. Intrinsic Kinetic Limitations in Substituted Lithium-Layered Transition-Metal Oxide Electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7001–7011 (2020)

  3. [11]

    Park, J. et al. Fictitious phase separation in Li layered oxides driven by electro-autocatalysis. Nat. Mater .20, 991–999 (2021)

  4. [12]

    Xu, C. et al. Operando visualization of kinetically induced lithium heterogeneities in single-particle layered Ni-rich cathodes. Joule 6, 2535–2546 (2022). 13

  5. [13]

    & Nazar, L

    Huang, H., Yin, S.-C. & Nazar, L. F. Approaching Theoretical Capacity of LiFePO 4 at Room Temperature at High Rates. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4, A170 (2001)

  6. [14]

    Li, J. et al. Comparison of Single Crystal and Polycrystalline LiNi 0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 Positive Elec- trode Materials for High V oltage Li-Ion Cells.J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1534 (2017)

  7. [15]

    Lun, Z. et al. Cation-disordered rocksalt-type high-entropy cathodes for Li-ion batteries.Nat. Mater . 20, 214–221 (2021)

  8. [16]

    & Manthiram, A

    Sada, K., Darga, J. & Manthiram, A. Challenges and Prospects of Sodium-Ion and Potassium-Ion Batteries for Mass Production. Adv. Energy Mater .13, 2302321 (2023)

  9. [17]

    & Pasta, M

    Dhir, S., Wheeler, S., Capone, I. & Pasta, M. Outlook on K-ion batteries. Chem 6, 2442–2460 (2020)

  10. [18]

    Global critical minerals outlook 2025 (2025)

    IEA. Global critical minerals outlook 2025 (2025). URL https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025

  11. [19]

    & Goodenough, J

    Lu, Y ., Wang, L., Cheng, J. & Goodenough, J. B. Prussian blue: a new framework of electrode materials for sodium batteries. Chem. Commun. 48, 6544–6546 (2012)

  12. [20]

    Pasta, M. et al. Full open-framework batteries for stationary energy storage. Nat. Commun. 5, 3007 (2014)

  13. [21]

    & Pasta, M

    Hurlbutt, K., Wheeler, S., Capone, I. & Pasta, M. Prussian Blue Analogs as Battery Materials. Joule 2, 1950–1960 (2018)

  14. [22]

    D., Peddada, S

    Wessells, C. D., Peddada, S. V ., McDowell, M. T., Huggins, R. A. & Cui, Y . The Effect of Insertion Species on Nanostructured Open Framework Hexacyanoferrate Battery Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, A98–A103 (2011)

  15. [23]

    Li, W. et al. Chemically diverse and multifunctional hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites.Nat. Rev. Mater .2, 16099 (2017). 14

  16. [24]

    Sharpe, A. G. The chemistry of cyano complexes of the transition metals . Organometallic chemistry (Academic Press, London ; New York, 1976)

  17. [25]

    Wu, X. et al. Highly Crystallized Na 2CoFe(CN)6 with Suppressed Lattice Defects as Superior Cathode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater . Interfaces8, 5393–5399 (2016)

  18. [26]

    & Kim, J

    Moritomo, Y ., Kurihara, Y ., Matsuda, T. & Kim, J. Structural phase diagram of Mn-Fe cyanide against cation concentration. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 103601 (2011)

  19. [27]

    & Goodwin, A

    Cattermull, J., Pasta, M. & Goodwin, A. L. Structural complexity in Prussian blue analogues. Mater . Horiz. 8, 3178–3186 (2021)

  20. [28]

    Jiang, L. et al. Building aqueous K-ion batteries for energy storage. Nat. Energy 4, 495–503 (2019)

  21. [29]

    Cattermull, J. et al. Uncovering the Interplay of Competing Distortions in the Prussian Blue Ana- logue K2Cu[Fe(CN)6]. Chem. Mater .34, 5000–5008 (2022)

  22. [30]

    & Goodwin, A

    Cattermull, J., Pasta, M. & Goodwin, A. L. Predicting Distortion Magnitudes in Prussian Blue Analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24471–24475 (2023)

  23. [31]

    & Komaba, S

    Bie, X., Kubota, K., Hosaka, T., Chihara, K. & Komaba, S. A novel K-ion battery: hexacyanofer- rate(II)/graphite cell. J. Mater . Chem. A5, 4325–4330 (2017)

  24. [32]

    Fiore, M. et al. Paving the Way toward Highly Efficient, High-Energy Potassium-Ion Batteries with Ionic Liquid Electrolytes. Chem. Mater .32, 7653–7661 (2020)

  25. [33]

    J., Pasta, M

    Cattermull, J., Roth, N., Cassidy, S. J., Pasta, M. & Goodwin, A. L. K-ion Slides in Prussian Blue Analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24249–24259 (2023)

  26. [34]

    D., Huggins, R

    Wessells, C. D., Huggins, R. A. & Cui, Y . Copper hexacyanoferrate battery electrodes with long cycle life and high power. Nat. Commun. 2, 550 (2011)

  27. [35]

    & Komaba, S

    Hosaka, T., Fukabori, T., Kojima, H., Kubota, K. & Komaba, S. Effect of particle size and anion vacancy on electrochemical potassium ion insertion into potassium manganese hexacyanoferrates. ChemSusChem 14, 1166–1175 (2021). 15

  28. [36]

    Deng, L. et al. Defect-free potassium manganese hexacyanoferrate cathode material for high- performance potassium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 2167 (2021)

  29. [37]

    Dhir, S. et al. Characterisation and Modelling of Potassium-ion Batteries. Nat. Commun. 15, 7580 (2024)

  30. [38]

    Wang, L. et al. Rhombohedral Prussian white as cathode for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2548–2554 (2015)

  31. [39]

    Brant, W. R. et al. Selective Control of Composition in Prussian White for Enhanced Material Properties. Chem. Mater .31, 7203–7211 (2019)

  32. [40]

    & Lee, J

    Jiang, X., Zhang, T., Yang, L., Li, G. & Lee, J. Y . A Fe/Mn-Based Prussian Blue Analogue as a K-Rich Cathode Material for Potassium-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 4, 2237–2242 (2017)

  33. [41]

    Harbourne, E. A. et al. Rules governing Jahn-Teller order in Prussian blue analogues. arXiv DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.13169 (2024)

  34. [42]

    Bostr ¨om, H. L. B. & Brant, W. R. Octahedral tilting in Prussian blue analogues. J. Mater . Chem. C 10, 13690–13699 (2022)

  35. [43]

    Peng, F. et al. Highly crystalline sodium manganese ferrocyanide microcubes for advanced sodium ion battery cathodes. J. Mater . Chem. A7, 22248–22256 (2019)

  36. [44]

    Le Pham, P. N. et al. Prussian blue analogues for potassium-ion batteries: insights into the electro- chemical mechanisms. J. Mater . Chem. A11, 3091–3104 (2023)

  37. [45]

    S., Blade, H., McCabe, J

    Geddes, H. S., Blade, H., McCabe, J. F., Hughes, L. P. & Goodwin, A. L. Structural characterisation of amorphous solid dispersions via metropolis matrix factorisation of pair distribution function data. Chem. Commun. 55, 13346–13349 (2019)

  38. [46]

    K., Nanjundaswamy, K

    Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S. & Goodenough, J. B. Phospho-olivines as Positive-Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1188 (1997). 16

  39. [47]

    Harbourne, E. A. et al. Local structure and dynamics in MPt(CN)6 Prussian blue analogues. Chem. Mater .36, 5796–5804 (2024)

  40. [48]

    Xu, G.-L. et al. Insights into the structural effects of layered cathode materials for high voltage sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1677–1693 (2017). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7EE00827A

  41. [49]

    & Tarascon, J.-M

    Bruce, P., Scrosati, B. & Tarascon, J.-M. Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 2930–2946 (2008)

  42. [50]

    Simonov, A. et al. Hidden diversity of vacancy networks in Prussian blue analogues. Nature 578, 256–260 (2020)

  43. [51]

    Tan, J. C. & Cheetham, A. K. Mechanical properties of hybrid inorganic–organic framework ma- terials: establishing fundamental structure–property relationships. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1059–1080 (2011)

  44. [52]

    Reversible Structural Transition in MIL-53 with Large Temperature Hysteresis

    Liu, Y .et al. Reversible Structural Transition in MIL-53 with Large Temperature Hysteresis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 11813–11818 (2008)

  45. [53]

    Krause, S. et al. A pressure-amplifying framework material with negative gas adsorption transitions. Nature 532, 348–352 (2016)

  46. [54]

    Guzelturk, B. et al. Visualization of dynamic polaronic strain fields in hy- brid lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater . 20, 618–623 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00865-5

  47. [55]

    Dubajic, M. et al. Dynamic nanodomains dictate macroscopic properties in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 755–763 (2025)

  48. [56]

    & Mitzi, D

    Saparov, B. & Mitzi, D. B. Organic–inorganic perovskites: Structural versatility for functional materials design. Chem. Rev. 116, 4558–4596 (2016)

  49. [57]

    T., Cheeetham, A

    D., B. T., Cheeetham, A. K., Fuchs, A. H. & Coudert, F.-X. Interplay between defects, disorder and flexibility in metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 9, 11–16 (2017). 17

  50. [58]

    Bostr ¨om, H. L. B., Senn, M. S. & Goodwin, A. L. Recipes for improper ferroelectricity in molecular perovskites. Nat. Commun. 9, 2380 (2018)

  51. [59]

    Kronawiiter, S. M. & Kieslich, G. The wondrous world of ABX 3 molecular perovskites. Chem. Commun. 60, 11673–11684 (2024). 18

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.