Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 28 of 28 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2509.06936.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2509.06936 v1

Coverage vector

measured 28 of 28 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.659674Z

measured 29 of 29 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.717732Z

Reference resolution

28 of 28 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact2
  • verified fuzzy23
  • unresolved3
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 12e666c3-9704-45c1-8540-ae88bf149487 · outbound

This paper cites Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.723874Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z digest=sha256:6745d99c6b874ea3c8b9c94bd9d6339099e5e84102b43a0b3ef1a3a11c580787

Observation 4a7a270c-3eb3-4f5e-b9b3-9f1f6687da45 · outbound

This paper cites Low” (0,0.33), “Moderate.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Low” (0,0.33), “Moderate

Reference 2

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.026721Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.566492Z digest=sha256:8f8def6116816e32bb11abce005314bdb548ebef4d845eb899c609aed8587907

Observation 5d815927-1a2f-4ec2-99b3-12f321057596 · outbound

This paper cites We start from the full collection.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets We start from the full collection

Reference 3

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.013747Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.570652Z digest=sha256:a04466615c2d610641aba5be13610870de255e609c82c0d9d49e9ac00c7e9a48

Observation cb953dfa-a6da-47e4-a266-df0bddbeeea1 · outbound

This paper cites ForMGPHot we use our proposed split.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets ForMGPHot we use our proposed split

Reference 4

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.000991Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.574483Z digest=sha256:ac42ae15f6606a4ccf03a4174d04f1e0d667881429d64d3756712e1d741b06be

Observation bd3ec1cd-d120-4562-bb68-1242b6beaaf1 · outbound

This paper cites Instrument.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Instrument

Reference 5

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.988979Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.578398Z digest=sha256:b2f3dc81e5df7dea5f6218c7e03c1b483da098766eff6be2aac3840d4a65b557

Observation 180e3deb-eceb-4676-9f18-f0d378b106eb · outbound

This paper cites This distribution of win- ners indicates that there is no single reliable choice.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets This distribution of win- ners indicates that there is no single reliable choice

Reference 6

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.976864Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.582448Z digest=sha256:1e7a889c4bc90c026558edb0eea752fc461af2973a79d3d881a777fc4c8d100e

Observation 1ff0d24e-3c2a-491f-afbf-19c5dfbf64bb · outbound

This paper cites IA y M´usica: C ´atedra en Inteligen- cia Artificial y M ´usica.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets IA y M´usica: C ´atedra en Inteligen- cia Artificial y M ´usica

Reference 7

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.962843Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.586321Z digest=sha256:0669c0a61e36b4d96b1dfb97941d2290841e0870f1191d7045494962d575dc72

Observation 253a4780-b460-4b41-8402-7eac92a2d171 · outbound

This paper cites Automatic tagging of audio: The state-of-the-art,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Automatic tagging of audio: The state-of-the-art,

Reference 8

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.950523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.589865Z digest=sha256:95ad66fe63b1b95a5cf03cfabc5f735cf40efe03539f256985f77ecc90d8c89a

Observation d44bb64d-c559-491f-8068-9e5c67992f56 · outbound

This paper cites A survey of tagging techniques for music, speech and environmental sound,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets A survey of tagging techniques for music, speech and environmental sound,

Reference 9

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.938281Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.593349Z digest=sha256:292602ae09646bf85782c668d261966bda49129ef46bc3df02e1829408045899

Observation 6bac585e-1a56-4d9e-8a1f-13f9ff890c7d · outbound

This paper cites Three current issues in music autotagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Three current issues in music autotagging,

Reference 10

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.925396Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.596837Z digest=sha256:f94be9b04965928d7f2974fe7cd03765a3b4d62cacf02b6f58b3748322c556b5

Observation 8957a392-5c0f-4b49-8013-ffe54c0ec903 · outbound

This paper cites Supervised and unsupervised learning of audio representations for music understanding,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Supervised and unsupervised learning of audio representations for music understanding,

Reference 11

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.912328Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.600504Z digest=sha256:534c43accf87cb655045ac0106b70a2224a59294bfd73d153c91da18751b9313

Observation 5ca136b1-a901-4110-838c-4f6a64f914d7 · outbound

This paper cites Foundation Models for Music: A Survey.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Foundation Models for Music: A Survey

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.604395Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.604395Z digest=sha256:62e6c1d3fc2a5e5951c3595eb800fc213bd005288ccdd6b802d16d3320e029a1

Observation c6b5db43-a3ed-401e-97cc-0a5a4312bb8f · outbound

This paper cites Musical genre classification of audio signals,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Musical genre classification of audio signals,

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.608240Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.608240Z digest=sha256:5eea28ac6317433a3d185aa587f4f693eaee699cc234fb463bc779850121ad5a

Observation 5fd2b9b3-9825-435b-ad0e-fc0d81462c19 · outbound

This paper cites The latin music database,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The latin music database,

Reference 14

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.891227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.611997Z digest=sha256:a67c5cb760da132b13d9f77eb5623177b46fe43edebcc345cb6a3c04c1cd4357

Observation 96d81995-77fb-436a-b62d-bf13c9d5c8af · outbound

This paper cites Cross- collection evaluation for music classification tasks,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Cross- collection evaluation for music classification tasks,

Reference 15

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.880070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.615401Z digest=sha256:6362efb118e8216e4549b69dfe22fbfff516dde48fdc455c2c411e0085af1476

Observation d054bc9a-d936-4894-bb9b-e27780045d59 · outbound

This paper cites The GTZAN dataset: Its contents, its faults, their effects on evaluation, and its future use.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The GTZAN dataset: Its contents, its faults, their effects on evaluation, and its future use

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.618998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.618998Z digest=sha256:9f752d7f3e2f23091df0bf0f310cde0548f3eac3931a16341936f816d71e26f8

Observation 7eeb57e8-b610-4dea-95ed-d61307eb1c22 · outbound

This paper cites Faults in the latin music database and with its use,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Faults in the latin music database and with its use,

Reference 17

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.868463Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.622857Z digest=sha256:404f6ca80105c2e28beeba281f45c0379f3d9690fb2f9c14f0674aa1f876a800

Observation 95260399-3f50-4713-ad64-f16dfec148ad · outbound

This paper cites Evaluation of algorithms using games: The case of mu- sic tagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Evaluation of algorithms using games: The case of mu- sic tagging,

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.857691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.626237Z digest=sha256:afd4592cd20e261b9744bb1b0957550fb042ed08dce25dd0679b6ad75ab98837

Observation 3f518fbd-b0a5-47ef-a358-c8857f84c9fe · outbound

This paper cites The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic mu- sic tagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic mu- sic tagging,

Reference 19

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.845806Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.629671Z digest=sha256:4436a082e1fe4ed6c63e4f1dd00994209fdcb4c0b6b86c264cdb6ab7de5ac9c2

Observation b6cf0bc5-4b94-4430-a2cf-4433866ac7f2 · outbound

This paper cites Mgphot: A dataset of musicological anno- tations for popular music (1958–2022),.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Mgphot: A dataset of musicological anno- tations for popular music (1958–2022),

Reference 20

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.833821Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.632875Z digest=sha256:4f713cd124adb89318ca3f043096978d82a6abcaf1402c0c422ad22f3dc0a6af

Observation 4a83dff5-6ba5-445b-aeff-0932a2074f65 · outbound

This paper cites Robust speech recogni- tion via large-scale weak supervision,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Robust speech recogni- tion via large-scale weak supervision,

Reference 21

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.822426Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.636161Z digest=sha256:1a3bdc7426fa873ff48c272de9c0f26fa3d4878008f4ee98ed27f152a9d02f81

Observation 2790c0a5-edce-4f2e-bac5-5fbe45ec15ad · outbound

This paper cites Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

Reference 22

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.810246Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.639691Z digest=sha256:05f79369ef5402fa525a96dc17851fd15287d78df6265508a5724249840f8efe

Observation de86f960-0bd7-447f-a5ed-2fa6a8bfb9ee · outbound

This paper cites Efficient supervised training of audio transformers for music rep- resentation learning,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Efficient supervised training of audio transformers for music rep- resentation learning,

Reference 23

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.798607Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.642891Z digest=sha256:6f7b0d038c81debcf5257f2056a30699797b557d1ea09b578bacb1da25d2c6fd

Observation 3712e6ec-0288-4000-bb0f-7c603cef87b9 · outbound

This paper cites Mert: Acoustic music un- derstanding model with large-scale self-supervised train- ing,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Mert: Acoustic music un- derstanding model with large-scale self-supervised train- ing,

Reference 24

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.785698Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.646205Z digest=sha256:d6a0e7364590af29900ef9bc6fdda48274e1029f55e551b48edd4af5702ff0ea

Observation 14ab5446-24d9-44a5-a355-c82ecc59c7fa · outbound

This paper cites A foundation model for music informatics,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets A foundation model for music informatics,

Reference 25

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.773307Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.649535Z digest=sha256:4d07da75eb2856b71d67cbabb5a2a562014728794a0df686f9a2552c9e4f7713

Observation a70991f6-2ab3-4005-94b9-ddc6e8dfc844 · outbound

This paper cites OMAR-RQ: Open music audio representation model trained with multi-feature masked token prediction,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets OMAR-RQ: Open music audio representation model trained with multi-feature masked token prediction,

Reference 26

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.760932Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.652972Z digest=sha256:8883e34e6a1eda56e9cd505a94fecc2a1d26bb8127f903a7ca4e51643b4eba69

Observation 1cbb177c-eb55-4f39-80ae-ba2703c18845 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models,

Reference 27

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.748447Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.656403Z digest=sha256:a2090e3720517729cee33fd31a116707521624ad4a9c2facc4aa49f6251c0b33

Observation d715fab7-8ef7-4cfd-9f09-ca44868ab883 · outbound

This paper cites Green mir?: Investigating computational cost of recent music- ai research in ismir,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Green mir?: Investigating computational cost of recent music- ai research in ismir,

Reference 28

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.736626Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.659674Z digest=sha256:ca250a835f5c79c00429b2d3b494c097a511787d1452d6ee3e702b2effe26715

Pith citing papers

Observation 12e666c3-9704-45c1-8540-ae88bf149487 · inbound

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets cites this paper.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.723874Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z digest=sha256:6745d99c6b874ea3c8b9c94bd9d6339099e5e84102b43a0b3ef1a3a11c580787