Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.399157Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits
As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 29 of 29 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2509.10437.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T23:02:00.127624Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: pith, observed 2026-07-10T23:37:44.684937Z
Reference resolution
29 of 29 outbound references displayed
- verified exact3
- verified fuzzy11
- unresolved15
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 9417f01e-b6cc-42dd-a3de-2c41a4e400ab · outbound
This paper cites Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.304306Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7bad5650-9bce-4900-8495-fdbd4fe5a551 · outbound
This paper cites Einstein, B.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Einstein, B
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.308542Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 16c9295a-38df-4176-8096-5a36dce2d8eb · outbound
This paper cites The einstein-podolsky-rosen argument in quan- tum theory,.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits The einstein-podolsky-rosen argument in quan- tum theory,
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.693326Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 929d0f7b-47ea-4130-b7cd-334adb137925 · outbound
This paper cites Relational quantum mechanics,.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Relational quantum mechanics,
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.681576Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 0fdead82-5a8e-470e-89e2-fdaa82e64fe6 · outbound
This paper cites Copenhagenish interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Copenhagenish interpretations of quantum mechanics
Reference 5
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.480899Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 832273c4-5121-476a-80cc-98a8aa949555 · outbound
This paper cites Harrigan and R.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Harrigan and R
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.671962Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation bbb08172-5eb1-4a16-b0ac-479d6017b110 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 7
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.324969Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 82282539-26e1-4da6-9321-8630d414bd59 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 8
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.656540Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 5043eb87-dfb5-4e77-a70a-bba8e6b3985d · outbound
This paper cites Aaronson, A.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Aaronson, A
Reference 9
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.645252Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 165ca7e6-7a0a-49ae-92ee-fcd71d6452b0 · outbound
This paper cites Barrett, E.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Barrett, E
Reference 10
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.337099Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e9f20d50-2350-453f-8eae-2d5f505d0e77 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 11
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.628119Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 32e827f5-ae9e-4eca-b389-10c40f94d5cd · outbound
This paper cites Branciard, Phys.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Branciard, Phys
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.617556Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 6bb81ffd-17ce-44ed-adde-072e9515026d · outbound
This paper cites Kochen and E.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Kochen and E
Reference 13
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.607285Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation f2804ad4-e289-4625-82f3-4f736eddb47d · outbound
This paper cites Tavakoli, E.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Tavakoli, E
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.353638Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation cd3335b5-169d-43ec-bef3-f0a4f2d92e43 · outbound
This paper cites Chaturvedi, M.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Chaturvedi, M
Reference 15
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.356742Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 59da5e98-618a-41e0-bcc4-f1ff1473382c · outbound
This paper cites Manna, A.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Manna, A
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.430469Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 5801a875-c8a6-4797-b111-e9c486f4ed9c · outbound
This paper cites Limits of Classical correlations and Quantum advantages under (Anti-)Distinguishability constraints in Multipartite Communication.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Limits of Classical correlations and Quantum advantages under (Anti-)Distinguishability constraints in Multipartite Communication
Reference 17
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.362111Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 138066a2-6263-4a72-b3a3-04c925674a87 · outbound
This paper cites Oszmaniec, L.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Oszmaniec, L
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.584977Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation ca33dc85-c907-41cb-bd9e-d3988e77d171 · outbound
This paper cites Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Failure of epistemic models to explain the antidistinguishability of quantum mixed preparations
Reference 19
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.367989Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ea2c1036-d0b2-4f3d-a03a-65870a5943c6 · outbound
This paper cites Session 7: The wave-functionψ: ontic vs epistemic debate,.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Session 7: The wave-functionψ: ontic vs epistemic debate,
Reference 20
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.574753Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation ee7c7606-c611-42c6-8969-63b0b5639a5a · outbound
This paper cites No-go theorems,.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits No-go theorems,
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.564362Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 3ac65b23-3ba6-4907-981f-741ba294978f · outbound
This paper cites Chaturvedi and D.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Chaturvedi and D
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.376776Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5fa5c78c-c219-493f-a077-72e25efa5332 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.379992Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4f63bb9c-029b-4739-84c1-18916cee202f · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.540734Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 4c4aeb17-9c99-457a-a1a9-64b07c0ad166 · outbound
This paper cites How statistical are quantum states?.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits How statistical are quantum states?
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.445234Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 40038ae9-c92d-4067-8052-4a92fb60cc9c · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.389469Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 33d17f0f-5838-41fa-82ed-2c6e85ae23b7 · outbound
This paper cites Colbeck and R.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Colbeck and R
Reference 27
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.523192Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 1b6f9b63-c290-4d32-aab4-11c9d0d13135 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits Unresolved cited work
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.511572Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Observation 53752055-53e7-498c-a501-7c2e086e9a83 · outbound
This paper cites For any given Hilbert space dimension, (34) and (35) give a direct way to lower boundB Q(α,β)via an alter- nating SDP.
Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits For any given Hilbert space dimension, (34) and (35) give a direct way to lower boundB Q(α,β)via an alter- nating SDP
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T16:09:44.501573Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation f7c4f996-b42e-42e7-ab6e-78050cf20682 · inbound
Nonlocality without entanglement in exclusion of quantum states cites this paper.
Nonlocality without entanglement in exclusion of quantum states Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits
Reference 40
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T23:02:00.127624Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3993404a-d23f-4076-ae24-6f266f83b07a · inbound
Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution from Operational Assumptions cites this paper.
Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution from Operational Assumptions Maximally $\psi-$epistemic models cannot explain gambling with two qubits
Reference 84
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-10T23:37:44.701449Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00.