REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by
Imprints of quantum vacuum fluctuations on the gravitational field of a spherical mass
T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Under the paper's two assumptions—non-positive vacuum energy density, unbounded at a would-be Killing horizon—static spherical semiclassical spacetimes are horizonless and carry a wormhole throat at radius $r_0 \ge 2M$.
desk verdict Clean conditional theorems with an honest caveat: the physics hangs entirely on two unproven assumptions about vacuum energy density. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the static spherically symmetric line element in area-radius coordinates, $ds^2 = -A(r)\,dt^2 + dr^2/B(r) + r^2 d\Omega^2$, with the quantum vacuum represented as an anisotropic fluid with energy density $\rho$, radial pressure, and tangential pressure. The load-bearing identity is the Misner–Sharp mass relation $m' = 4\pi r^2 \rho$ (with $m = r(1-B)/2$), which converts the sign of $\rho$ into the growth of $m(r)$ and hence the existence of a root of $B$. The divergence of $\rho$ at a root of $A$ is fed into the sum-of-squares form of the Kretschmann scalar, forcing $A$ to stay positive; the same negativity of $\rho$ then makes $d^2r/dx^2$ positive at the root of $B$, identifying it as a wormhole throat.
What would settle it
Search for a static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat solution of the semiclassical Einstein equations in which $A(r)$ has a positive root while the renormalized vacuum energy density $\rho(r)$ remains finite or becomes positive somewhere in the exterior. A direct route is a numerical backreaction calculation with a minimally coupled scalar field in the static vacuum state: if $\rho(r)$ does not diverge as $A(r)\to 0$, or if an admissible state gives $\rho>0$ in the coordinate patch, Proposition 1 is contradicted and the horizon need not be replaced by a throat.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's central claim is that Killing horizons are generically absent in the static exterior of a spherical mass when quantum vacuum fluctuations are the source: $A(r)$ must remain positive everywhere, while $B(r)$ has its outermost positive root at $r_0 \ge 2M$. Regularity forces the vanishing of $B$ to be a wormhole throat, because in the coordinate $x$ defined by $dx=dr/\sqrt{B}$ the area-radius function $r(x)$ has a strict minimum at $r_0$. The proofs run through the Kretschmann scalar, the Misner–Sharp mass relation $m' = 4\pi r^2 \rho$, and the sign of $d^2r/dx^2$ at the root. Two additional propositions constrain the global topology: if the spacetime is $\mathbb{R}^4$, a positive-energy spherical mass with $\rho_m(r) > |\rho(r)|$ must be present beyond the throat, and the total positive energy of that mass has a lower bound set by the total negative vacuum energy outside.
Load-bearing premise
The proof stands on the assumption that the quantum vacuum energy density is nowhere positive in the exterior and becomes infinitely negative at any surface where a time-translation horizon would form; the authors state that no general proof of these properties exists, so if the true energy density were positive somewhere or finite at such a surface, the horizon need not be replaced by a throat.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For static spherical semiclassical spacetimes satisfying the assumptions, $A(r)>0$ throughout: there is no Killing horizon and no surface of infinite blueshift.
- $B(r)$ nonetheless vanishes at $r_0 \ge 2M$; in regular coordinates that surface is a wormhole throat rather than a curvature singularity.
- A pure quantum-vacuum exterior cannot have $\mathbb{R}^4$ topology: additional matter with $\rho_m>|\rho|$ somewhere beyond the throat is required for the spacetime to end at $r=0$.
- The total positive energy needed to maintain $\mathbb{R}^4$ topology is bounded below by a quantity fixed by the negative vacuum energy outside the matter.
- Different regularization prescriptions that have produced wormhole throats in the literature are special cases of this same mechanism, so the conclusion is not tied to any one approximation.
Reading between the lines
- A natural next step, not taken here, is to feed the same two assumptions into time-dependent spherical collapse; if the throat persists dynamically, the semiclassical end state of collapse would differ from a classical black hole in ways that might be observable.
- The proof gives a cheap diagnostic for any future calculation: compute the renormalized vacuum energy density in a self-consistent static geometry and check for $\rho \le 0$ and $\rho \to -\infty$ at the would-be horizon; those two properties alone would force a throat.
- The lower bound in Proposition 5 can be read as a no-go statement: vacuum polarization by itself cannot assemble a regular $\mathbb{R}^4$ star out of nothing; ordinary positive-energy matter is required, with its amount set by the negative energy outside it.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper considers static, spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat solutions of the semiclassical Einstein equations sourced only by the renormalized vacuum expectation value of a quantum stress tensor, written as an anisotropic fluid. Under two assumptions introduced in Sec. II—that the vacuum energy density rho is non-positive everywhere in the coordinate patch and that rho diverges to -infinity at the outermost positive root of A(r) if one exists—the authors prove five propositions. Propositions 1-3 show that A(r) cannot have a positive root if the spacetime is regular, that B(r) must vanish at some r0 >= 2M, and that the surface r = r0 is a wormhole throat. Propositions 4-5 address the topology, arguing that R^4 topology requires additional positive-energy matter whose energy density exceeds |rho| beyond the throat, with a lower bound on the total positive energy. The discussion in Sec. IV interprets these results as unifying previous backreaction calculations and as evidence that Killing horizons are generically replaced by wormhole throats.
Significance. If the assumptions are accepted, the paper delivers a clean and nontrivial universality statement: the horizon-throat replacement follows from sign and divergence properties of rho alone, without fitting parameters or detailed stress-tensor calculations. The proofs of Propositions 1-3 are concise and, given the stated assumptions, correct; the paper is explicit about which properties of rho are needed and where. The unification of several earlier backreaction models under a common mechanism is a genuine conceptual contribution. The main caveat is that the two assumptions are the entire physical content, and the paper concedes in Sec. IV that no general proof of them exists; the cited evidence is partly drawn from the same class of models whose universality is being explained. The headline conclusion is therefore conditional, and the manuscript should be revised to state this explicitly.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. II, assumptions (i)-(ii) and footnote 1] These assumptions are load-bearing: Proposition 1 requires the divergence rho -> -infinity to make K1 diverge; Propositions 2 and 3 require rho <= 0 to conclude m(r) >= M and d^2r/dx^2 > 0. The paper concedes in Sec. IV that "there is no general proof that the quantum vacuum energy density must be negative and unbounded on surfaces of infinite blueshift." If in the physical state rho is positive somewhere or finite at the would-be horizon, none of the three propositions forces a throat, and the horizon need not be replaced. The abstract and conclusions state the replacement as a generic result ("we show the generic replacement"), which overstates the conditional nature of the theorem. Please reframe the title, abstract, and conclusions to present the result as conditional on these assumptions, or supply an independent argument for them.
- [Sec. IV, paragraphs on Boulware vacuum and backreaction literature] The evidence offered for the two assumptions is not independent of the claims being unified. The Boulware-vacuum results, the numerical evaluations [13,36-39], and the backreaction papers [19-33] are the same class of calculations the paper aims to subsume; the Polyakov approximation [41] is two-dimensional. A concrete test would be a 3+1 computation of the renormalized stress tensor in a physical vacuum state on a self-consistent backreacted geometry, checking rho <= 0 and the divergence property near the would-be horizon. Without such independent evidence, or an explicit reduction of the claim to a conjecture, the universality claim remains a conditional statement about a class of sources rather than an established prediction about quantum vacuum.
- [Sec. III, Proposition 5 and Eq. (24)] The proof of the lower bound is incomplete. The final step asserts that the integrals on the right-hand side are "greater or equal to the quantity resulting from restricting the integration to the interval x in [x_s,+infinity)", but this restricted quantity is not defined, and no explicit constant depending only on the exterior negative energy is exhibited. As written, Proposition 5 does not follow from the displayed inequalities. Please provide the missing definitions and a precise estimate, or clearly label the proposition as a sketch.
minor comments (3)
- [Eq. (10)] The notation rho(r)|_{r=r_star} is confusing because rho diverges at r_star; the intended meaning is the limit of rho(r) as r approaches r_star, which should be stated explicitly.
- [Sec. III, Proposition 4 proof] The proof assumes that r(x) is single-valued and sufficiently differentiable on the interval [x_bar, x_0]; please state these regularity hypotheses explicitly.
- [Sec. V, first paragraph] The statement that the spacetimes obtained "supersede the Schwarzschild metric as a more accurate description" is too strong given the conditional status of the assumptions; a more cautious formulation would be appropriate.
Circularity Check
Conditional theorems are internally valid; the mild circularity is that the input assumptions are supported by the same backreaction calculations the paper claims to unify, including several self-citations.
-
self citation load bearing
[Section II (Setup) and Section IV (Discussion)]
"we will assume that for static, spherically-symmetric and asymptotically flat semiclassical solutions, the quantum vacuum energy density is (i) non-positive everywhere and (ii) unbounded at the outermost positive root of A(r) (i.e., the would-be Killing horizon of ∂t), if the latter exists. We take these two aspects as defining characteristics of the energy density associated with quantum vacuum fluctuations ... Cumulative evidences include all the works studying backreaction mentioned above, in which these properties are satisfied [25, 27–33]."
The assumptions that drive Propositions 1–3 are not derived; they are declared 'defining characteristics' and then justified in Sec. IV by 'cumulative evidences' that include the very same backreaction calculations the paper presents as particular cases of its results, with several references ([20–23,28–30,41]) by overlapping authors. Thus the claimed universality is a reorganization of the input class: the class was defined by abstracting properties from those models, and the theorem returns the throat structure those models already displayed. The paper explicitly concedes there is no general proof, so this is an evidential and minor circularity, not an equation-level equivalence.
full rationale
The mathematical derivation from the stated assumptions is self-contained and not circular. Given ρ≤0 and ρ→−∞ at the outermost positive root of A(r) if one exists, the Einstein equation m′=4πr²ρ forces m(r)≥M and hence B(r)=0 at some r0≥2M; the same inequality gives d²r/dx²>0 at r0, identifying a wormhole throat; and the divergence of ρ makes the Kretschmann contribution K1 diverge if A had a positive root. No parameter is fitted and no displayed equation reduces to an input. The central weakness is the epistemic status of the two assumptions: the paper states them as defining characteristics of quantum-vacuum energy density and supports them by citing the same class of backreaction calculations it claims to explain, several of which are by overlapping authors. The paper is transparent that no general proof exists, and the theorems are explicitly conditional. Therefore the paper does not exhibit construction-level circularity; it carries a mild self-citation burden in the evidence for its physical premise, which is why the score is low rather than zero.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption The renormalized expectation value <0|T^|0> can be written as a static, spherically symmetric anisotropic fluid of the form (4).
- ad hoc to paper In the region covered by the coordinates of Eq. (1), the quantum vacuum energy density is non-positive, rho <= 0.
- ad hoc to paper If A(r) has a positive root, the vacuum energy density is unbounded, rho -> -infinity, at the outermost such root.
- domain assumption The semiclassical Einstein equations G = 8*pi*<T> hold with the classical Einstein tensor on the left-hand side.
- domain assumption The spacetime is regular in the region of interest, i.e., no curvature singularities.
- domain assumption A regular center of R^4 topology has r(x) ~ |x - xbar|, so dr/dx = +/-1 at the center.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Imprints of quantum vacuum fluctuations on the gravitational field of a spherical mass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2P5OXCEN
@misc{pith2026250910667,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Imprints of quantum vacuum fluctuations on the gravitational field of a spherical mass},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2P5OXCEN}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10667}
}
read the original abstract
The Schwarzschild geometry, describing the gravitational field of a spherical mass in classical vacuum, is one of the most famous vacuum solutions of the Einstein field equations. Classical vacuum is an idealization that does not include quantum vacuum fluctuations of quantum fields, and determining the form of the gravitational field of a spherical mass in quantum vacuum is an important step towards understanding the interplay between gravity and quantum field theory. We formulate and prove general results on the space of static, spherically symmetric and asymptotically flat spacetimes sourced by quantum vacuum fluctuations, obtained under the broad assumptions that the quantum vacuum energy density is negative and unbounded on Killing horizons. In particular, we show the generic replacement of Killing horizons by wormhole throats. We discuss how previous calculations in the literature that have used different prescriptions for the regularized vacuum expectation value of the quantum stress-energy tensor are particular cases of our general results.
Figures
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Macroscopic backreaction of the trace anomaly on classical vacuum backgrounds
Order-reduced backreaction of the trace-anomaly RSET on Schwarzschild gives a naked singularity without compensatory terms and a wormhole throat with them.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[41]
Two formalisms, one renormalized stress-energy tensor,
C. Barcelo, R. Carballo, and L. J. Garay, “Two formalisms, one renormalized stress-energy tensor,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 084001,arXiv:1112.0489 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2012
-
[1]
General Relativity and Gravitation: A Centennial Perspective
A. Ashtekar, B. K. Berger, J. Isenberg, and M. A. H. MacCallum, “General Relativity and Gravitation: A Centennial Perspective,”arXiv:1409.5823 [gr-qc]
-
[2]
On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,
K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916(1916) 189–196, arXiv:physics/9905030
arXiv 1916
-
[3]
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,
C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,”Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 4,arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]. 12
arXiv 2014
-
[4]
Quantum Gravity: A Brief History of Ideas and Some Prospects,
S. Carlip, D.-W. Chiou, W.-T. Ni, and R. Woodard, “Quantum Gravity: A Brief History of Ideas and Some Prospects,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24no. 11, (2015) 1530028, arXiv:1507.08194 [gr-qc]
arXiv 2015
-
[5]
The deepest problem: some perspectives on quantum gravity,
S. B. Giddings, “The deepest problem: some perspectives on quantum gravity,” arXiv:2202.08292 [hep-th]
-
[7]
Gravitational vacuum polarization,
M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization,” in8th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 8), pp. 842–844. 6, 1997.arXiv:gr-qc/9710034
arXiv 1997
-
[8]
On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,
J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,”Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679
1951
Show all 43 references
-
[9]
Black Stars, Not Holes,
C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, S. Sonego, and M. Visser, “Black Stars, Not Holes,”Sci. Am.301 no. 4, (2009) 38–45
2009
-
[10]
Stellar equilibrium in semiclassical gravity,
R. Carballo-Rubio, “Stellar equilibrium in semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 6, (2018) 061102,arXiv:1706.05379 [gr-qc]
2018 arXiv
-
[11]
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973
1973
-
[12]
Gravitational vacuum polarization. 1: Energy conditions in the Hartle-Hawking vacuum,
M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 1: Energy conditions in the Hartle-Hawking vacuum,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5103–5115,arXiv:gr-qc/9604007
1996 arXiv
-
[13]
Gravitational vacuum polarization. 2: Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum,
M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 2: Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5116–5122,arXiv:gr-qc/9604008
1996 arXiv
-
[14]
Gravitational vacuum polarization. 4: Energy conditions in the Unruh vacuum,
M. Visser, “Gravitational vacuum polarization. 4: Energy conditions in the Unruh vacuum,” Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 936–952,arXiv:gr-qc/9703001
1997 arXiv
-
[15]
Self-gravitating anisotropic fluids. I: Context and overview,
T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, “Self-gravitating anisotropic fluids. I: Context and overview,” arXiv:2406.03185 [gr-qc]
-
[16]
Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,
C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp, “Relativistic equations for adiabatic, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse,”Phys. Rev.136(1964) B571–B576
1964
-
[17]
Gravitational energy in spherical symmetry,
S. A. Hayward, “Gravitational energy in spherical symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 1938–1949,arXiv:gr-qc/9408002
1996 arXiv
-
[18]
Generic wormhole throats,
M. Visser and D. Hochberg, “Generic wormhole throats,”Annals Israel Phys. Soc.13(1997) 13 249,arXiv:gr-qc/9710001
1997 arXiv
-
[19]
Static Black Hole and Vacuum Energy: Thin Shell and Incompressible Fluid,
P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “Static Black Hole and Vacuum Energy: Thin Shell and Incompressible Fluid,”JHEP03(2018) 096,arXiv:1710.10390 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[20]
Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Semiclassical constant-density spheres in a regularized Polyakov approximation,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 084071, arXiv:2105.11261 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[21]
Semiclassical relativistic stars,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Semiclassical relativistic stars,”Sci. Rep.12no. 1, (2022) 15958,arXiv:2110.15808 [gr-qc]
2022 arXiv
-
[22]
Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Ultracompact horizonless objects in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 104056, arXiv:2310.12668 [gr-qc]
2024 arXiv
-
[23]
Arrechea,Hydrostatic equilibrium in the semiclassical approximation
J. Arrechea,Hydrostatic equilibrium in the semiclassical approximation. PhD thesis, Universidad de Granada, 2023
2023
-
[24]
Static Black Holes With Back Reaction From Vacuum Energy,
P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “Static Black Holes With Back Reaction From Vacuum Energy,” Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 6, (2018) 065012,arXiv:1703.08662 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[25]
The fate of black hole horizons in semiclassical gravity,
C. Berthiere, D. Sarkar, and S. N. Solodukhin, “The fate of black hole horizons in semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Lett. B786(2018) 21–27,arXiv:1712.09914 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[26]
On the Near-Horizon Geometry of an Evaporating Black Hole,
P.-M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, “On the Near-Horizon Geometry of an Evaporating Black Hole,” JHEP07(2018) 047,arXiv:1804.04821 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[27]
Semiclassical zero-temperature corrections to Schwarzschild spacetime and holography,
A. Fabbri, S. Farese, J. Navarro-Salas, G. J. Olmo, and H. Sanchis-Alepuz, “Semiclassical zero-temperature corrections to Schwarzschild spacetime and holography,”Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104023,arXiv:hep-th/0512167
2006 arXiv
-
[28]
Schwarzschild geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Schwarzschild geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 6, (2020) 064059, arXiv:1911.03213 [gr-qc]
2020 arXiv
-
[29]
Reissner–Nordstr¨ om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Reissner–Nordstr¨ om geometry counterpart in semiclassical gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.38no. 11, (2021) 115014, arXiv:2102.03544 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[30]
Asymptotically flat vacuum solutions in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,
J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, “Asymptotically flat vacuum solutions in order-reduced semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 085005, arXiv:2212.09375 [gr-qc]. 14
2023 arXiv
-
[31]
Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild metric from vacuum polarization,
P. Beltr´ an-Palau, A. del R´ ıo, and J. Navarro-Salas, “Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild metric from vacuum polarization,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 085023, arXiv:2212.08089 [gr-qc]
2023 arXiv
-
[32]
Quantum corrected Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes in semiclassical gravity,
B. Kain, “Quantum corrected Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes in semiclassical gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 4, (2025) 044033,arXiv:2502.08278 [gr-qc]
2025 arXiv
-
[33]
Dynamical evolution and stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black holes in semiclassical gravity,
B. Kain, “Dynamical evolution and stability of quantum corrected Schwarzschild black holes in semiclassical gravity,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 12, (2025) 124057,arXiv:2507.00109 [gr-qc]
2025 arXiv
-
[34]
Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,
D. G. Boulware, “Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,”Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 1404
1975
-
[35]
Hawking Radiation and Thin Shells,
D. G. Boulware, “Hawking Radiation and Thin Shells,”Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2169
1976
-
[36]
Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime,
P. Candelas, “Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime,”Phys. Rev. D21no. 8, (Apr., 1980) 2185–2202
1980
-
[37]
Stress-energy tensor of quantized scalar fields in static spherically symmetric space-times,
P. R. Anderson, W. A. Hiscock, and D. A. Samuel, “Stress-energy tensor of quantized scalar fields in static spherically symmetric space-times,”Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 4337–4358
1995
-
[38]
Macroscopic Effects of the Quantum Trace Anomaly,
E. Mottola and R. Vaulin, “Macroscopic Effects of the Quantum Trace Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064004,arXiv:gr-qc/0604051
2006 arXiv
-
[39]
Renormalized stress-energy tensor for scalar fields in the Boulware state with applications to extremal black holes,
J. Arrechea, C. Breen, A. Ottewill, L. Pisani, and P. Taylor, “Renormalized stress-energy tensor for scalar fields in the Boulware state with applications to extremal black holes,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 085009,arXiv:2409.04528 [gr-qc]
2025 arXiv
-
[40]
Black holes, brick walls and the Boulware state,
S. Mukohyama and W. Israel, “Black holes, brick walls and the Boulware state,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 104005,arXiv:gr-qc/9806012
1998 arXiv
-
[42]
Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,
R. Carballo-Rubio, “Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,”arXiv:2507.15920 [gr-qc]
-
[43]
Dynamical theory for spherical black holes in modified gravity,
A. Alonso-Bardaji and D. Brizuela, “Dynamical theory for spherical black holes in modified gravity,”arXiv:2507.19380 [gr-qc]
-
[44]
Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,
F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de Sousa Silva, A. Simpson, and M. Visser, “Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 084052,arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]. 15
2021 arXiv
Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.