Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Spatio-temporal, multi-field deep learning of shock propagation in meso-structured media

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A multi-field deep learning model predicts the full seven-field state of shock propagation through porous and lattice materials at 1.4–3.2% mean error, enabling thousandfold faster design studies.

desk verdict A useful engineering demonstration of multi-field autoregressive surrogates for shock in porous/lattice media, with real evidence that joint prediction beats single-field baselines; but the headline claims about localized hotspots and 1000x speedup outrun what the metrics actually measure. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.16139 v5 pith:IM6RR7NN submitted 2025-09-19 cs.LG

M. Giselle Fernández-Godino , Meir H. Shachar , Kevin Korner , Jonathan L. Belof , Mukul Kumar , Jonathan Lind , William J. Schill This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords multi-fieldspatio-temporalmodelshockpropagationporousmediaarchitectedlatticesautoregressivesurrogateCNN-LSTMhydrocodehighenergydensityphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Shock waves through porous or architected materials produce sharp fronts, collapsing pores, and counterintuitive density behavior that are expensive to simulate with conventional hydrocodes. The authors propose a single autoregressive model—the Multi-field Spatio-Temporal Model (MSTM)—that receives five frames of seven coupled fields (density, pressure, temperature, energy, material fraction, two velocity components) and predicts the next frame, then rolls itself forward for the full 50–60 frame sequence. On test cases for a porous aluminum disc and a 2D aluminum lattice, it reports mean RMSE of 1.4% and 3.2%, mass-conservation errors below 0.5%, and a ~1000× inference speedup, while beating seven single-field models by 94% in error and structural similarity. The central claim is that predicting all fields jointly—rather than independently—is what keeps autoregressive rollouts physically consistent, preserving interface sharpness and preventing the phase drift that plagues single-field surrogates. If the claim holds, it converts high-resolution shock design exploration from computationally prohibitive to tractable, with direct relevance to planetary defense and inertial fusion energy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Multi-field Spatio-Temporal Model (MSTM), a convolutional feature extractor (two 3×3 Conv2D layers with max pooling) that reduces each 60×60 seven-field frame to a 128×15×15 feature map, followed by a four-layer LSTM with 512 hidden units that processes the five-frame sequence and a fully connected layer that projects the final hidden state back to a 1×7×60×60 next-frame prediction. The mechanism that carries the argument is autoregressive joint prediction: the network is trained to predict all seven fields simultaneously, and during inference each newly predicted frame is appended to the sliding five-frame window, so updates to material fraction, density, velocitie

What would settle it

Run the trained MSTM on a held-out porous configuration whose pore structure includes features smaller than one 60×60 grid cell (or run the autoregressive rollout beyond the demonstrated 60 steps) and compare predicted fields against a sub-grid-resolved hydrocode simulation; if the surrogate omits, mislocates, or smears the resulting hotspot, or if mass conservation and interface sharpness degrade sharply beyond 60 steps, the central accuracy claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a hybrid convolutional–LSTM network, trained with teacher forcing on data from a high-fidelity hydrocode, can be deployed autoregressively to generate the complete two-dimensional evolution of seven coupled fields—density, two velocity components, pressure, total energy, material fraction, and temperature—on a 60×60 grid. The model is evaluated on two meso-structured geometries: a cylindrically symmetric porous aluminum disc and a planar architected aluminum lattice with variable porosity, lattice angle, and shock speed. It reports test-set mean RMSE of 1.4% for the porous case and 3.2% for the lattice case, structural similarity index (SSIM) abov

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that a 60×60 grid sampled at the paper's time intervals retains the pore-scale gradients and interface dynamics that actually govern hotspot formation and post-shock density anomalies; if those features live below the grid scale, the reported RMSE and stability metrics are comparisons between two coarse representations, not evidence of physical fidelity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported accuracy holds, design-space exploration over porosities, lattice angles, and shock speeds becomes feasible at roughly a thousandfold lower computational cost than direct hydrocode simulation.
  • The 94% improvement over single-field models indicates that joint multi-field prediction is a broadly applicable design principle for learned surrogates of coupled physical systems.
  • The demonstrated generalization to unseen parameter values within the training distribution supports the use of MSTM as a fast forward model for uncertainty quantification and inverse design.
  • Reproducing counterintuitive post-shock density reductions and localized hotspots suggests the surrogate captures the underlying nonlinear dynamics, not just smooth averages.
  • Mass-conservation errors below 0.5% over 50–60 step rollouts make the surrogate suitable as a candidate for embedding in optimization loops where many forward evaluations are required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural but untested extension is whether the multi-field coupling benefit persists at higher spatial resolution (e.g., 120×120 or 256×256); the paper only demonstrates 60×60, so the reported hotspot prediction may be a coarse-scale proxy rather than a resolved pore-scale phenomenon.
  • If the architecture's advantage generalizes to other multi-physics problems with strong field coupling and sharp fronts—such as reactive shocks, phase transformations, or multi-material mixing—the joint-prediction principle could transfer beyond meso-structured media.
  • The thousandfold speedup claim compares inference to a single hydrocode run; a fairer end-to-end comparison would include the cost of generating the training dataset and the amortized training time, which the paper leaves implicit.
  • A concrete testable prediction of the paper is that a single-field model trained on the same data will systematically lag shock positions and smear interfaces over long rollouts; this could be verified directly on the authors' data or on a new multi-field shock dataset.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MSTM, a hybrid CNN-LSTM autoregressive surrogate that evolves seven coupled thermodynamic and kinematic fields (density, two velocity components, pressure, material fraction, total energy, temperature) for shock propagation in porous and architected media. The model is trained on MARBL hydrocode data sampled on 60×60 grids and evaluated on held-out sequences from the same distribution. The authors report mean RMSE of 1.4% (porous) and 3.2% (lattice), high SSIM and IoU, small mass-conservation error, and a 94% improvement over single-field baselines in MSE and structural dissimilarity. They also claim a 1000× speedup over direct simulation and the ability to accurately predict anomalous localized responses such as post-shock density reductions and hotspot formation.

Significance. If the performance claims hold, MSTM would be a practically valuable surrogate: it provides full spatio-temporal, multi-field rollouts with low aggregate error and a large speedup, enabling design studies that are currently too expensive. The paper has clear strengths: a controlled comparison against seven single-field models under identical training and rollout settings, a held-out evaluation protocol, multiple complementary metrics (MSE, IoU, SSIM, CM), and generalization tests across porosities, lattice angles, and loading conditions. However, several load-bearing claims outrun the evidence. The headline claims of accurate localized hotspot prediction and physical consistency are not substantiated by the global mask-averaged RMSE or by the mass-conservation metric alone. The speedup is asserted but never measured, and the coarse 60×60 representation is not validated against the simulation mesh. These issues are addressable with additional targeted analyses, so the result is defensible after revision.

major comments (5)
  1. [§V.B, Eq. (B1)] The abstract's central claim that MSTM 'accurately predict[s] ... localized hotspot formation' is not supported by the reported metric. Eq. (B1) averages squared error over all masked cells, all seven fields, all time steps, and all test samples after per-field min-max normalization. A rare localized error — a missed hotspot or a small density-reduction zone — contributes negligibly to this global average. I request targeted diagnostics: per-field error restricted to high-temperature cells, hotspot detection rate and false-positive rate as a function of time, and spatial error maps at late times. Without these, the headline claim is stronger than the evidence.
  2. [§V.B, Appendix C] The 'physical consistency' claim rests only on mass conservation (CM, Eq. B7). The model is trained with MSE on independently normalized fields, so there is no mechanism enforcing the LEOS relations among ρ, p, T, and e described in Appendix C. I ask for a direct thermodynamic consistency check: evaluate the LEOS residual on predicted fields, or compare predicted (ρ, p, T) points against the MARBL Hugoniot. This is needed because the paper advertises physical consistency as a differentiator from single-field models and as support for use in design studies.
  3. [§III, §IV] All training and evaluation targets are 60×60 grids, and autoregressive rollouts are limited to 50–60 steps. The manuscript does not quantify the MARBL mesh resolution relative to the 60×60 coarse grid, nor does it establish that pore-scale features driving hotspots are resolvable at this resolution. Also, 'long autoregressive rollouts' and 'interface stability' are claimed, but no experiment extends beyond the native sequence length. I request a resolution study (e.g., errors vs. downsampling factor) and at least a few rollouts extended beyond the training horizon to substantiate stability.
  4. [§VI, abstract] The 1000×/three-orders-of-magnitude speedup is asserted but never measured. No wall-clock timings, hardware specifications for MARBL, or inference timings (including I/O and the autoregressive loop) are reported. Since speedup is one of the three headline contributions, a precise benchmarking protocol is needed; the claim should be removed or made quantitative.
  5. [§IV vs §V.B] The number of porous test sequences is inconsistent: Section IV states 85 test sequences, while Section V.B and Figure 8 report '91 porous ... test simulations.' This must be reconciled, as the aggregate metrics in Table I depend on the test-set definition. Please also state the sequence-level split criterion (e.g., whether sequences from the same initial condition appear in both train and test).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'relative torelative to' is a typo and should read 'relative to single-field spatio-temporal models.'
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption refers to 'velocity in x and z,' while the text and field list define u_x and u_y; please make the notation consistent.
  3. [§V.C] The claim of '94% lower structural dissimilarity' is based on 1−SSIM, which is very small for both models. Please also report the absolute SSIM and 1−SSIM values for clarity.
  4. [Data availability] The statement 'code and trained models are available upon request' is not reproducible in practice. Consider depositing the code, trained weights, and data-processing scripts in a permanent repository with versioned release.
  5. [Appendix B.2] The IoU material-mask thresholds differ between datasets ([0.20,0.30] for porous, [0.54,0.99] for lattice). The paper does not explain how these intervals were chosen; a one-sentence justification would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: empirical accuracy on held-out data.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are measurements of predictive accuracy on held-out MARBL simulation sequences. The model is trained with teacher forcing on ground-truth frames and evaluated autoregressively on test sequences not used in training (Section IV: 'we employ teacher forcing...', Section V-B). No parameter is fit to the test quantities it claims to predict. The only self-citations (e.g., ref 38 on wind-driven deposition, refs 64-65 in the bibliography) are not used to justify the central result. The paper explicitly separates ground truth from predictions (Figure 12: 'These plots derive from ground truth data; no machine learning methods were applied'). The 60x60 downsampling and the global averaging of MSE are limitations on the strength of the physical claims, but they are not circular: the model's outputs are not defined in terms of the targets, and no theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The surrogate inherits the MARBL hydrocode assumptions (compressible Euler, LEOS equations of state, strength models) and the coarse 60x60 representation. The reported metrics are in normalized space defined by training-set extrema, and the material mask thresholds used in IoU and QoI calculations are hand-selected. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Network weights (MSTM) = 36,834,032 trainable parameters
    The surrogate's output is the fitted function; its test accuracy is a property of this fitted parameter set.
  • Per-field min-max normalization extrema = Field-specific training-set extrema
    Fields are normalized to [0,1] using training-set extrema; the reported 1.4-3.2% RMSE is measured in this normalized space, so the errors depend on these fitted normalizers.
  • Material mask thresholds (lb, ub) = Porous: [0.20,0.30]; lattice: [0.54,0.99]
    Hand-selected thresholds define IoU and the mass-averaged QoI errors (Appendix E). Changing them changes the reported 5% QoI error and IoU values.
  • Architectural hyperparameters = Window=5, conv channels 64/128, LSTM hidden 512, lr=5e-4, batch=256, epochs=1000
    Selected by hand; no ablation study justifies these choices or shows sensitivity of the reported metrics to them.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Compressible Euler equations with LEOS equations of state and Steinberg-Guinan/elastic-plastic strength models describe the shock physics (Appendix C)
    The surrogate is trained on MARBL solutions of these equations; its accuracy is measured against this model, not physical experiment.
  • domain assumption A 60x60 grid and five-frame input window are sufficient representations of the shock dynamics (Sections III and IV)
    The model operates on this coarse, downsampled representation; any claim of physical fidelity presupposes this representation captures the relevant phenomena.
  • domain assumption The training distribution covers the intended deployment regime (Section III)
    Porosity 5-75%, lattice porosity 10-90%, angle 0-45 degrees, shock speed 0.1-0.4 cm/µs; generalization claims are limited to interpolating within these sampled ranges.
  • standard math Standard stochastic optimization (Adam) converged to a good local minimum (Section IV)
    No formal guarantee; empirical validation on the held-out test set is relied upon.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatio-temporal, multi-field deep learning of shock propagation in meso-structured media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IM6RR7NN

@misc{pith2026250916139,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatio-temporal, multi-field deep learning of shock propagation in meso-structured media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IM6RR7NN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.16139}
}
read the original abstract

Predicting the extreme hydrodynamic response of porous and architected lattice materials is a fundamental challenge in high energy density physics, where shock-induced pore collapse, baroclinic vorticity, and anomalous kinetic and thermodynamic states must be resolved across multiple scales. Traditional high-fidelity hydrocodes are computationally prohibitive for large-scale design exploration in applications like planetary defense and inertial confinement fusion. We present a multi-field spatio-temporal model (MSTM) designed to overcome the limitations of standard machine learning surrogates, which often fail to capture the sharp gradients and non-linear field couplings characteristic of shock propagation. By training on high-fidelity, multiscale multiphysics data, MSTM simultaneously evolves seven coupled thermodynamic and kinetic fields - including pressure, temperature, density, and velocity - across complex material architectures. Our framework demonstrates the ability to accurately predict anomalous responses, such as counterintuitive post-shock density reductions and localized hotspot formation, with mean root mean squared errors as low as 1.4%. Crucially, the model's multi-field formulation maintains physical consistency and interface stability over long autoregressive rollouts, outperforming single-field models by 94% in structural fidelity. This framework enables a 1000x reduction in time to solution, providing a practical pathway for the real-time analysis and optimization of energy dissipation and momentum transfer in meso-structured media.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Huy Pham , author H

    author author C. Huy Pham , author H. E. \ Lorenzana , author J. L. \ Belof , \ and\ author N. Goldman ,\ title title Hugoniot properties of porous stainless steel: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 134 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  2. [2]

    author author D. J. \ Kline , author M. P. \ Hennessey , author D. K. \ Amondson , author S. Lin , author M. D. \ Grapes , author M. Ferrucci , author P. Li , author H. K. \ Springer , author R. V. \ Reeves , author K. T. \ Sullivan , \ and\ author J. L. \ Belof ,\ title title Reducing richtmyer--meshkov instability jet velocity via inverse design , \ 10....

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0180712 2024

  3. [3]

    author author S. W. \ Cheung , author Y. Choi , author H. K. \ Springer , \ and\ author T. Kadeethum ,\ title title Data-scarce surrogate modeling of shock-induced pore collapse process , \ @noop journal journal Shock Waves \ volume 34 ,\ pages 237--256 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  4. [4]

    author author R. W. \ Anderson , author V. A. \ Dobrev , author T. V. \ Kolev , author R. N. \ Rieben , \ and\ author V. Z. \ Tomov ,\ title title High-order multi-material ale hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing \ volume 40 ,\ pages B32--B58 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  5. [5]

    author author V. A. \ Dobrev , author T. V. \ Kolev , \ and\ author R. N. \ Rieben ,\ title title High-order curvilinear finite element methods for lagrangian hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing \ volume 34 ,\ pages B606--B641 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  6. [6]

    Mufti , author C

    author author B. Mufti , author C. Perron , \ and\ author D. N. \ Mavris ,\ title title Nonlinear reduced-order modeling of compressible flow fields using deep learning and manifold learning , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.12088 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Abbasi , author Y

    author author J. Abbasi , author Y. Lyu , author L. De Ryck , author S. Mishra , et al. ,\ title title Challenges and advancements in modeling shock fronts with physics-informed neural networks: A review and benchmarking study , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17379 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2025

  8. [9]

    author author M. A. \ Rahman , author Z. E. \ Ross , \ and\ author K. Azizzadenesheli ,\ title title U-no: U-shaped neural operators , \ @noop journal journal Trans. Machine Learning Research \ ( year 2023 ) ,\ note accepted, arXiv:2301.03735 NoStop

    arXiv 2023

Show all 75 references
  1. [10]

    Pfaff , author M

    author author T. Pfaff , author M. Fortunato , author A. Sanchez-Gonzalez , \ and\ author P. W. \ Battaglia ,\ title title Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) \ ( year 2021...

    2021 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Covoni , author F

    author author G. Covoni , author F. Montomoli , author V. L. \ Tagarielli , author V. Bisio , author S. Rossin , \ and\ author M. Ruggiero ,\ title title Application of graph neural networks to predict explosion-induced transient flow , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Modelin...

    2024

  3. [13]

    Bhattacharya , author P

    author author A. Bhattacharya , author P. K. \ Seshadri , \ and\ author H. S. \ Udaykumar ,\ title title Machine learning for shock compression of solids using scarce data , \ @noop journal journal AIP Advances \ volume 13 ,\ pages 045312 ( year 2023 a ) ,\ note https://doi.or...

    2023 doi

  4. [14]

    Tompson , author K

    author author J. Tompson , author K. Schlachter , author P. Sprechmann , \ and\ author K. Perlin ,\ title title Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML) \ ( year 2017 )\ pp.\ pages ...

    2017

  5. [15]

    Lu , author P

    author author L. Lu , author P. Jin , author G. Pang , author Z. Zhang , \ and\ author G. E. \ Karniadakis ,\ title title Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators , \ @noop journal journal Nature Machine Intelligence \...

    2021

  6. [16]

    Bhattacharya , author P

    author author A. Bhattacharya , author P. K. \ Seshadri , \ and\ author H. S. \ Udaykumar ,\ title title Data-scarce surrogate modeling of shock-induced pore collapse process , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18812 \ ( year 2023 b ) ,\ note https://arxiv.org/...

    2023 arXiv

  7. [17]

    author author S. W. \ Chung , author C. Miller , author Y. Choi , author P. Tranquilli , author H. K. \ Springer , \ and\ author K. Sullivan ,\ title title Latent space dynamics identification for interface tracking with application to shock-induced pore collapse , \ @noop jou...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [18]

    Saad , author J

    author author F. Saad , author J. Burnim , author C. Carroll , author B. Patton , author U. K \"o ster , author R. A. Saurous , \ and\ author M. Hoffman ,\ title title Scalable spatiotemporal prediction with bayesian neural fields , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communication...

    2024

  9. [19]

    author author V. A. \ Dobrev , author T. Ellis , author T. V. \ Kolev , \ and\ author R. Rieben ,\ title title Curvilinear finite elements for lagrangian hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids \ volume 65 ,\ pages 1295--13...

    2011

  10. [20]

    LeCun , author L

    author author Y. LeCun , author L. Bottou , author Y. Bengio , \ and\ author P. Haffner ,\ title title Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the IEEE \ volume 86 ,\ pages 2278--2324 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  11. [21]

    Hochreiter \ and\ author J

    author author S. Hochreiter \ and\ author J. Schmidhuber ,\ title title Long short-term memory , \ @noop journal journal Neural computation \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1735--1780 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997

  12. [22]

    Goodfellow , author Y

    author author I. Goodfellow , author Y. Bengio , author A. Courville , \ and\ author Y. Bengio ,\ @noop title Deep learning ,\ Vol. volume 1 \ ( publisher MIT press Cambridge ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  13. [23]

    Jaccard ,\ title title The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone

    author author P. Jaccard ,\ title title The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1 , \ @noop journal journal New phytologist \ volume 11 ,\ pages 37--50 ( year 1912 ) NoStop

    1912

  14. [24]

    Wang , author A

    author author Z. Wang , author A. C. \ Bovik , author H. R. \ Sheikh , \ and\ author E. P. \ Simoncelli ,\ title title Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , \ @noop journal journal IEEE transactions on image processing \ volume 13 ,\ pages ...

    2004

  15. [25]

    author author R. J. \ LeVeque ,\ @noop title Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems ,\ Vol. volume 31 \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  16. [26]

    Chalapathi , author Y

    author author N. Chalapathi , author Y. Du , \ and\ author A. Krishnapriyan ,\ title title Scaling physics-informed hard constraints with mixture-of-experts , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13412 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  17. [27]

    N \'e giar , author M

    author author G. N \'e giar , author M. W. \ Mahoney , \ and\ author A. S. \ Krishnapriyan ,\ title title Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraints , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08675 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 arXiv

  18. [28]

    author author M. G. \ Fern \'a ndez-Godino , author D. D. \ Lucas , \ and\ author Q. Kong ,\ title title Predicting wind-driven spatial deposition through simulated color images using deep autoencoders , \ @noop journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1394 ( ye...

    2023

  19. [29]

    author author R. W. \ Anderson , author V. A. \ Dobrev , author T. V. \ Kolev , \ and\ author R. N. \ Rieben ,\ title title Monotonicity in high-order curvilinear finite element arbitrary lagrangian--eulerian remap , \ @noop journal journal International Journal for Numerical ...

    2015

  20. [30]

    Vargas , author V

    author author A. Vargas , author V. Tomov , author M. A. \ Skinner , author V. Dobrev , author J. Nikl , author T. Kolev , \ and\ author R. Rieben ,\ title title Multi-material ale remap with interface sharpening using high-order matrix-free finite element methods , \ @noop jo...

    2025

  21. [31]

    author author D. J. \ Steinberg et al. ,\ @noop title Equation of state and strength properties of selected materials \ ( publisher Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  22. [32]

    Goldstein , author C

    author author H. Goldstein , author C. P. \ Poole , \ and\ author J. L. \ Safko ,\ @noop title Classical mechanics third edition, chapter 7 , \ ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  23. [33]

    author author P. P. \ Mazza , author D. Zietlow , author F. Carollo , author S. Andergassen , author G. Martius , \ and\ author I. Lesanovsky ,\ title title Machine learning time-local generators of open quantum dynamics , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Research \ vol...

    2021

  24. [34]

    author author T. R. \ Dhakal , author B. M. \ Haines , \ and\ author R. E. \ Olson ,\ title title Effects of thermal conductivity of liquid layer in nif wetted foam experiments , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 26 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  25. [35]

    Parveez , author N

    author author B. Parveez , author N. A. \ Jamal , author H. Anuar , author Y. Ahmad , author A. Aabid , \ and\ author M. Baig ,\ title title Microstructure and mechanical properties of metal foams fabricated via melt foaming and powder metallurgy technique: a review , \ @noop ...

    2022

  26. [36]

    Garcia-Avila , author M

    author author M. Garcia-Avila , author M. Portanova , \ and\ author A. Rabiei ,\ title title Ballistic performance of a composite metal foam-ceramic armor system , \ @noop journal journal Procedia Materials Science \ volume 4 ,\ pages 151--156 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  27. [37]

    Zhao , author C

    author author Y. Zhao , author C. Ma , author D. Xin , \ and\ author M. Sun ,\ title title Dynamic mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Materials Research \ volume 35 ,\ pages 2575--2586 ( ye...

    2020

  28. [38]

    Nichols-Fleming , author A

    author author F. Nichols-Fleming , author A. J. \ Evans , author B. C. \ Johnson , \ and\ author M. M. \ Sori ,\ title title Porosity evolution in metallic asteroids: Implications for the origin and thermal history of asteroid 16 psyche , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Geo...

    2022

  29. [39]

    Barrios , author T

    author author M. Barrios , author T. Boehly , author D. Hicks , author D. Fratanduono , author J. Eggert , author G. Collins , \ and\ author D. Meyerhofer ,\ title title Precision equation-of-state measurements on national ignition facility ablator materials from 1 to 12 mbar ...

    2012

  30. [40]

    author author K. R. \ Housen , author W. J. \ Sweet , \ and\ author K. A. \ Holsapple ,\ title title Impacts into porous asteroids , \ @noop journal journal Icarus \ volume 300 ,\ pages 72--96 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  31. [41]

    Schill , author M

    author author W. Schill , author M. Armstrong , author J. Nguyen , author D. Sterbentz , author D. White , author L. Benedict , author R. Rieben , author A. Hoff , author H. Lorenzana , author J. Belof , et al. ,\ title title Suppression of richtmyer-meshkov instability via sp...

    2024

  32. [42]

    author author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author D. J. \ Kline , author D. A. \ White , author C. F. \ Jekel , author M. P. \ Hennessey , author D. K. \ Amondson , author A. J. \ Wilson , author M. J. \ Sevcik , author M. F. \ Villena , author S. S. \ Lin , et al. ,\ title title Explo...

    2024

  33. [43]

    author author D. J. \ Kline , author M. P. \ Hennessey , author D. K. \ Amondson , author S. Lin , author M. D. \ Grapes , author M. Ferrucci , author P. Li , author H. K. \ Springer , author R. V. \ Reeves , author K. T. \ Sullivan , et al. ,\ title title Reducing richtmyer--...

    2024

  34. [44]

    author author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author C. F. \ Jekel , author D. A. \ White , author S. Aubry , author H. E. \ Lorenzana , \ and\ author J. L. \ Belof ,\ title title Design optimization for richtmyer--meshkov instability suppression at shock-compressed material interfaces , ...

    2022

  35. [45]

    author author P. C. H. \ Nguyen , author Y.-T. \ Nguyen , author P. K. \ Seshadri , author J. B. \ Choi , author H. S. \ Udaykumar , \ and\ author S. Baek ,\ title title A physics-aware deep learning model for energy localization in multiscale shock-to-detonation simulations o...

    2022 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Li , author N

    author author Z. Li , author N. Kovachki , author K. Azizzadenesheli , author B. Liu , author K. Bhattacharya , author A. Stuart , \ and\ author A. Anandkumar ,\ title title Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations , \ @noop journal journal arXiv p...

    2010 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Tompson , author K

    author author J. Tompson , author K. Schlachter , author P. Sprechmann , \ and\ author K. Perlin ,\ title title Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks , \ in\ @noop booktitle International conference on machine learning \ ( organization PMLR ,\ year...

    2017

  38. [48]

    Cai , author Z

    author author S. Cai , author Z. Wang , author L. Lu , author T. A. \ Zaki , \ and\ author G. E. \ Karniadakis ,\ title title Deepm&mnet: Inferring the electroconvection multiphysics fields based on operator approximation by neural networks , \ @noop journal journal Journal of...

    2021

  39. [49]

    Pfaff , author M

    author author T. Pfaff , author M. Fortunato , author A. Sanchez-Gonzalez , \ and\ author P. Battaglia ,\ title title Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks , \ in\ @noop booktitle International conference on learning representations \ ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  40. [50]

    author author P. D. \ Bello-Maldonado , author T. V. \ Kolev , author R. N. \ Rieben , \ and\ author V. Z. \ Tomov ,\ title title A matrix-free hyperviscosity formulation for high-order ale hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Computers & Fluids \ volume 205 ,\ pages 104577...

    2020

  41. [51]

    Jekel , author D

    author author C. Jekel , author D. Sterbentz , author T. Stitt , author P. Mocz , author R. Rieben , author D. White , \ and\ author J. Belof ,\ title title Machine learning visualization tool for exploring parameterized hydrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Machine Learning...

    2024

  42. [52]

    author author G. R. \ Johnson ,\ title title A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands, 1983 \ ( year...

    1983

  43. [53]

    author author S. D. \ Ramsey , author E. M. \ Schmidt , author Z. M. \ Boyd , author J. F. \ Lilieholm , \ and\ author R. S. \ Baty ,\ title title Converging shock flows for a mie-gr \"u neisen equation of state , \ @noop journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 30 ( year 20...

    2018

  44. [54]

    author author M. J. \ Berger \ and\ author J. Oliger ,\ title title Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of computational Physics \ volume 53 ,\ pages 484--512 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  45. [55]

    \ Liu , author S

    author author X.-D. \ Liu , author S. Osher , \ and\ author T. Chan ,\ title title Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes , \ @noop journal journal Journal of computational physics \ volume 115 ,\ pages 200--212 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  46. [56]

    Anderson , author A

    author author R. Anderson , author A. Black , author B. Blakeley , author R. Bleile , author J. Camier , author J. Ciurej , author A. Cook , author V. Dobrev , author N. Elliott , author J. Grondalski , et al. ,\ title title The multiphysics on advanced platforms project , \ @...

    2020

  47. [57]

    Trunin , author L

    author author R. Trunin , author L. Gudarenko , author M. Zhernokletov , \ and\ author G. Simakov ,\ title title Experimental data on shock compression and adiabatic expansion of condensed matter , \ @noop journal journal Sarov: RFNC-VNIIEF \ ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  48. [58]

    Jones , author J

    author author K. Jones , author J. M. D. \ Lane , \ and\ author T. J. \ Vogler ,\ title title Molecular dynamics study of shock compression in porous silica glass , \ in\ @noop booktitle AIP Conference Proceedings ,\ Vol.\ volume 1979 \ ( organization AIP Publishing ,\ year 20...

    1979

  49. [59]

    author author M. G. \ Fern \'a ndez-Godino , author F. Ouellet , author R. T. \ Haftka , \ and\ author S. Balachandar ,\ title title Early time evolution of circumferential perturbation of initial particle volume fraction in explosive cylindrical multiphase dispersion , \ 10.1...

    2019 doi

  50. [60]

    author author C. H. \ Pham , author H. E. \ Lorenzana , author J. L. \ Belof , \ and\ author N. Goldman ,\ title title Hugoniot properties of porous stainless steel: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations , \ 10.1063/5.0161413 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \...

    2023 doi

  51. [61]

    author author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author C. F. \ Jekel , author D. A. \ White , author S. Aubry , \ and\ author J. L. \ Belof ,\ title title Design optimization for richtmyer--meshkov instability suppression at dynamically driven perturbed interfaces , \ 10.1063/5.0100100 jour...

    2022 doi

  52. [62]

    author author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author D. J. \ Kline , author D. A. \ White , author C. F. \ Jekel , author M. P. \ Hennessey , author D. K. \ Amondson , author A. J. \ Wilson , author M. J. \ Sevcik , author M. F. L. \ Villena , author S. S. \ Lin , author M. D. \ Grapes , ...

    2024 doi

  53. [63]

    author author W. J. \ Schill , author M. R. \ Armstrong , author J. H. \ Nguyen , author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author D. A. \ White , author L. X. \ Benedict , author R. N. \ Rieben , author A. Hoff , author H. E. \ Lorenzana , author B. M. \ La Lone , author M. D. \ Staska , \ ...

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    author author C. F. \ Jekel , author D. M. \ Sterbentz , author S. Aubry , author Y. Choi , author D. A. \ White , \ and\ author J. L. \ Belof ,\ title title Using conservation laws to infer deep learning model accuracy of richtmyer--meshkov instabilities , \ in\ @noop booktit...

    2022 arXiv

  55. [65]

    author author M. G. \ Fern \'a ndez-Godino , author M. H. \ Shachar , author K. A. \ Korner , author W. J. \ Schill , author C. F. \ Jekel , \ and\ author J. L. \ Belof ,\ title title Optimization of porosity distributions for shock physics using deep learning , \ in\ @noop bo...

    2025

  56. [66]

    Li , author J

    author author C. Li , author J. C. \ Verduzco , author B. H. \ Lee , author R. J. \ Appleton , \ and\ author A. Strachan ,\ title title Mapping microstructure to shock-induced temperature fields using deep learning , \ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17345 \ ( ...

    2023 arXiv

  57. [67]

    author author E. M. \ Bringa , author S. Traiviratana , \ and\ author B. A. \ Remington ,\ title title Shock compression of porous materials and foams using classical molecular dynamics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Shock Compression of Condensed Matter--2009 \ ( publisher Springer ...

    2009 doi

  58. [68]

    author author E. M. \ Bringa , author S. Traiviratana , \ and\ author B. A. \ Remington ,\ title title Low-pressure dynamic compression response of porous materials , \ in\ @noop booktitle Shock Compression of Condensed Matter--2009 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2019 )\ pp.\ ...

    2009 doi

  59. [69]

    author author E. M. \ Bringa , author S. Traiviratana , \ and\ author B. A. \ Remington ,\ title title Molecular dynamics simulations of shock compressed heterogeneous materials: Shock wave structure and hugoniot relations , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \...

    2015 doi

  60. [70]

    author author E. M. \ Bringa , author S. Traiviratana , \ and\ author B. A. \ Remington ,\ title title Recent developments in modeling shock compression of porous materials , \ in\ @noop booktitle Shock Compression of Condensed Matter--2009 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2019 ...

    2009 doi

  61. [71]

    Li , author J

    author author C. Li , author J. C. \ Verduzco , author B. H. \ Lee , author R. J. \ Appleton , \ and\ author A. Strachan ,\ title title Mapping microstructure to shock-induced temperature fields using deep learning , \ @noop journal journal npj Computational Materials \ volume...

    2023 doi

  62. [72]

    author author E. M. \ Bringa , author S. Traiviratana , \ and\ author B. A. \ Remington ,\ title title Enhanced densification under shock compression in porous silicon , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 014102 ( year 2015 b ) ,\ note https://doi.o...

    2015 doi

  63. [73]

    Cai , author Z

    author author S. Cai , author Z. Wang , author L. Lu , author T. A. \ Zaki , \ and\ author G. E. \ Karniadakis ,\ title title Deepm&mnet: Inferring the electroconvection multiphysics fields based on operator approximation by neural networks , \ @noop journal journal Journal of...

    2021

  64. [74]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number org...

    2010

  65. [75]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number org...

    2010

  66. [76]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

  67. [77]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.