Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Worldline field theory can be bootstrapped on-shell by complexifying worldline energies, reproducing the next-to-leading gravitational waveform and the O(G³) radial action.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 13:00 UTC pith:J63YAJWF

load-bearing objection Complexified worldline energies give a serious new unitarity method, with real cross-checked results; the completeness premise is unproven and the big outputs are in missing ancillaries, so referee it but demand the supplementary files. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.00989 v6 pith:J63YAJWF submitted 2025-10-01 hep-th gr-qc

Generalized Unitarity Method for Worldline Field Theory

Vincent F. He , Julio Parra-Martinez This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords generalized unitarityworldline field theorygravitational waveformpost-Minkowskian expansionon-shell actioncomplexified kinematicssoft theoremclassical scattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the generalized unitarity method of scattering amplitudes carries over to worldline field theory, which models compact objects as point particles coupled to gravity. The obstacle is that cutting a worldline propagator only fixes the double pole in frequency; the simple 1/ω pole looks like a non-local ambiguity. The authors resolve this by complexifying the worldline energy so the on-shell condition becomes ωω̄=0, with two independent on-shell branches, and showing that imposing both factorisations fixes the simple-pole coefficient. If correct, classical gravitational observables such as the waveform and the radial action can be bootstrapped from locality, unitarity, gauge invariance, and a soft theorem, with no gauge-fixed off-shell input. The paper verifies this by reproducing the known next-to-leading-order waveform at O(G^{5/2}) and the conservative on-shell action through O(G³).

Core claim

The paper establishes that worldline-theory integrands for classical gravitational observables are fixed by locality, unitarity, gauge invariance up to linear order in external frequencies, and the leading soft theorem, without writing a Lagrangian or Feynman rules. The enabling move is complexifying each worldline fluctuation energy, so the on-shell condition mω²=0 becomes mωω̄=0; cutting with ω→0 and with ω̄→0 gives two independent factorisation conditions that together pin down the single poles in frequency, which in the real worldline theory are not local contact terms and cannot be matched by adding local operators. With these complexified building blocks, the method of maximal cuts con

What carries the argument

The central device is the complexified worldline energy: promoting the fluctuation energy ω to a pair (ω, ω̄) turns the on-shell condition ω²=0 into mωω̄=0, which has two branches (ω=0 or ω̄=0). Imposing factorisation on both branches determines the coefficient of the physical single 1/ω pole that the real on-shell limit leaves ambiguous. The amplitudes also obey a soft theorem connecting n+1-point worldline amplitudes to derivatives of n-point ones with respect to impact parameter and velocity, used to constrain local building blocks; the maximal-cut method then assembles loop integrands by gluing these on-shell sub-amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two complex on-shell limits (ω→0 and ω̄→0), together with gauge invariance to linear order in external frequencies, leave no room for a term that is analytic in ω and evades both cuts yet still contributes to the physical 1/ω pole after integration; the paper relies on agreement with known results rather than a proof of this completeness.

What would settle it

Compute the O(G³) gravitational waveform or the O(G⁴) conservative radial action by the complexified maximal-cut prescription alone and compare with a direct Feynman-diagram/IBP evaluation; any disagreement after integration, while both constructions satisfy every cut, Ward identity, and power-counting condition, would show the simple-pole fixing is incomplete. A more local test: try to add to a two-loop radial-action numerator a term linear in a loop frequency that vanishes on all unitarity cuts but is non-zero after IBP reduction—if such a term exists, the prescription has an undetermined co

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same complexified-cut rules can be applied at higher orders: computing the O(G³) waveform or O(G⁴) conservative integrand now requires only recycling lower-point, lower-order on-shell amplitudes, not multi-loop Feynman rules.
  • Because the construction is purely on-shell, the final integrand is gauge-invariant and free of the off-shell redundancies of Feynman-diagram approaches, so integration can begin directly from a fixed integrand.
  • The checks at two nontrivial orders—the radial action through O(G³) and the waveform at O(G^{5/2})—both integrate to known results, providing a baseline for trusting future predictions made by the method.
  • Rational building blocks such as Compton scattering, the impulse from a gravitational wave, and nonlinear Compton scattering are themselves fixed by the same principles, giving a Lagrangian-free derivation of the worldline vertices used in these computations.
  • The method supplies a new soft theorem for worldline fluctuations, connecting amplitudes with an extra soft worldline state to impact-parameter and velocity derivatives of lower-point amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-branch cut prescription is complete at higher orders, the method should by itself reproduce the O(G³) waveform and the O(G⁴) conservative dynamics; a discrepancy there would pinpoint missing analytic-in-ω terms rather than an integration error.
  • The same complex-frequency trick is generic to one-dimensional worldlines, so it likely extends to electromagnetic or scalar point-particle theories, and to dissipative observables once the in-in contour and Wightman cuts are included.
  • The explicit soft theorem linking worldline amplitudes to impact-parameter and velocity derivatives suggests a direct route to radiation-reaction and memory effects from lower-point integrands without new diagrammatics.
  • Relaxing the minimal-coupling power-counting ansatz would turn the method into a systematic tool for tidal deformations and other non-minimal couplings, since only the set of allowed contact terms would need enlarging.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a generalized unitarity method for worldline quantum field theory (WQFT). The central technical idea is to complexify the worldline energy so that the on-shell condition becomes mωω̄ = 0 (Eq. 8). The authors argue that imposing factorization on the two complexified cuts ω = 0 and ω̄ = 0, together with gauge invariance and a leading soft theorem, unambiguously fixes the coefficients of the physical simple poles in frequency. This is used to bootstrap rational (tree-like) worldline amplitudes from locality, unitarity, gauge invariance, and the soft theorem, and then to construct loop integrands via the method of maximal cuts. The method is illustrated with linear and non-linear Compton scattering, the impulse from a gravitational wave, the conservative on-shell action through O(G^3), and the O(G^{5/2}) gravitational waveform. The latter two are verified by IBP reduction and integration against known results.

Significance. If correct, this work provides a genuinely new on-shell bootstrap for worldline observables, bypassing Feynman diagrams and gauge-fixed off-shell input. The paper contains strong cross-checks: Eq. (60) agrees with the known linear Compton amplitude; Sec. 4.1 reproduces the O(G^3) on-shell action; Sec. 4.2 reproduces the O(G^{5/2}) waveform, with coefficients matching those of Ref. [32]. The use of explicit ancillary files and the comparison with independently known results are commendable and make the technical claims reproducible in principle. The method, if fully established, could streamline post-Minkowskian calculations and open the door to systematic studies of double-copy structures in worldline theories. However, the unproven completeness of the complexified-cut prescription and the reliance on an external power-counting ansatz temper the significance of the central claim as currently stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (28a)–(28b)] The central claim that the two complexified cuts uniquely determine the coefficient of the physical 1/ω pole is asserted but not proven. A term analytic in ω that vanishes on both ω = 0 and ω̄ = 0 could in principle contribute to the physical simple pole after identifying ω = ω̄ and integrating. All loop-level applications inherit this premise, and the only current evidence is agreement with known results on the two checked observables. Please provide a proof, or at least a systematic characterization of the residual ambiguities and a demonstration that they are harmless (e.g., contact-term-like or vanishing after integration).
  2. [Sec. 3.1, 'Power counting' bullet] The bootstrap of rational amplitudes uses an external power-counting ansatz: at most two u and/or ω factors per worldline vertex and at most two graviton momenta per bulk vertex. This restriction to minimal coupling is not implied by locality, unitarity, gauge invariance, or the soft theorem. As the paper acknowledges, non-minimal couplings would satisfy the same on-shell constraints. Therefore the statement in Sec. 3 that rational amplitudes are 'completely fixed' by basic principles is too strong. The method as presented constructs amplitudes within a chosen minimal-coupling subspace; please clarify this limitation explicitly and, if possible, prove completeness within that subspace or indicate how non-minimal couplings can be systematically included.
  3. [Secs. 4.1 and 4.2, N2MC1/N2MC2 topologies] The constructed integrands for both the on-shell action and the waveform contain undetermined coefficients. The paper notes that these correspond to contact-term freedoms or terms that vanish after integration, and in the checked examples the integrated result is independent of them. However, this weakens the central claim of 'construction of integrands': the method determines the integrand only modulo terms that do not contribute to the observables considered. This limitation should be stated in the abstract and introduction, and the paper should specify whether these residual coefficients can be fixed by additional physical input (e.g., higher-order gauge invariance or matching) or are intrinsic to the method.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.1, after Eq. (60)] Typo: 'well-know' should read 'well-known'.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, text near Eq. (8)] The notation is inconsistent in places: 'setting eitherωor ωto zero' loses the bar on the second ω. Please ensure all complexified energies are consistently typeset as ω and ω̄.
  3. [Sec. 4.1] The sentence 'The ansatz is composed only of two diagrams with the topology of the maximal cuts MC1, MC2' is confusing because N1MC1 is also listed in the same paragraph. Please clarify which topologies are actually used in the ansatz.
  4. [General] The paper would benefit from a table summarizing, for each example, which coefficients are fixed by which cuts, which are fixed by gauge invariance, and which remain undetermined. This would make the method's power and its limitations much more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central construction is an on-shell bootstrap checked against independent known results.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The complexified on-shell condition mωω̄=0 (Eq. 8) is introduced as a way to access single-pole residues; the paper claims that both limits 'unambiguously fix' these residues, but this completeness premise is not reduced to the target observables. The rational building blocks are fixed by locality, unitarity factorization, gauge invariance (Eq. 29), and a soft theorem (Eq. 30) that is proven in the text from spurionic symmetries rather than imported as an assumption from the authors' prior work. Unknown ansatz coefficients are solved from cuts and Ward identities, and leftover contact coefficients are either fixed by gauge invariance or shown to cancel upon integration. The final O(G^5/2) waveform and O(G^3) on-shell action are compared with independent known results (for example, the waveform coefficients are checked against Ref. [32]), rather than fitted to them. The only self-citations of note are Refs. [100,101] for the geometric-soft-theorem analogy in the proof of Eq. (30), which is not load-bearing because the proof is given in the paper itself. The reader's worry about completeness of the complexified-cut prescription is a genuine limitation of the method's justification, but it is not circularity: no target observable is used as an input to define or fit the construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 7 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction imports from the prior literature the WQFT action (Eqs. 1-2), the physical-state projector (Eq. 23), and the classical-limit power counting; it introduces as new input the complexified on-shell condition, the ansatz rules, and the soft theorem (derived), and it leaves contact-term coefficients free in the shipped construction. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Undetermined contact-term coefficients in N2MC1/N2MC2 topologies
    Sections 4.1-4.2: the maximal-cut procedure leaves a set of coefficients unfixed ('freedom of moving contact terms... or terms that correspond to the four-graviton contact term'); the paper asserts they cancel after integration. In the construction as shipped, these are genuinely free parameters whose vanishing is a check, not an input.
  • Power-counting ansatz rules (max two u/ω factors per worldline vertex, max two k factors per bulk vertex)
    Section 3, item 3: a choice restricting the bootstrap to minimal coupling; not derived from locality/unitarity, and acknowledged to miss non-minimal couplings. Selected by hand to make the bootstrap tractable.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Locality and unitarity of worldline QFT: integrands factorize when an internal graviton or worldline propagator goes on-shell (Eqs. 22a, 22b).
    Section 2.2; posited as the foundation of the cut method; no proof that the complexified factorization covers all poles.
  • ad hoc to paper Complexified worldline kinematics: on-shell condition mωω̄=0 and the two cuts ω=0, ω̄=0 determine the physical simple-pole content (Eqs. 8, 28).
    Section 2.3; introduced to fix simple poles; completeness assumed rather than proven.
  • ad hoc to paper Ansatz completeness: the local building blocks are exhausted by diagram symmetry, little-group scaling, and the stated power counting (minimal coupling).
    Section 3 list; truncation to minimal coupling is explicit; the authors note it could be relaxed.
  • standard math Soft theorem Eq. (30) holds for complexified amplitudes, derived from spurionic spacetime-translation symmetries of the worldline action (Eqs. 31-38).
    Section 2.4; the symmetry argument is a derivation following Refs. [100,101], but the theorem is then used as a bootstrap condition in Sec. 3.
  • domain assumption Classical limit: closed graviton/worldline loops are power-counting suppressed; classical observables are tree diagrams integrated against sources.
    Section 2.1; standard WQFT/EFT fact with a power-counting check cited to [77].
  • standard math Scaleless and pure-longitudinal topologies (bubble integrals, same-worldline graviton tadpoles, Eqs. 72-74) vanish in dimensional regularization or vanish on physical external states.
    Sections 4.1-4.2; standard DR results; if wrong, the discarded topologies would shift the rest of the integrand.
  • domain assumption Gauge invariance fixes contact terms only up to linear order in external worldline energies (Eq. 29).
    Section 2.3; the Ward identity is imposed at O(ω) only; the difference at O(ω²) is an unconstrained freedom.
invented entities (1)
  • Complexified worldline on-shell states z and z̄ (conjugate-frequency external states) no independent evidence
    purpose: Bookkeeping device: with ω̄ω=0, the two complex cuts ω=0 and ω̄=0 each access one half of the single-pole data of worldline propagators, resolving the simple-pole obstruction (Eqs. 26-28).
    Purely formal construct analogous to complex kinematics in spinor-helicity (Sec. 2.3); both states reduce to the same physical worldline fluctuation at real ω=0; no falsifiable prediction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23799 in / 19672 out tokens · 230157 ms · 2026-08-04T13:00:14.000340+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a generalized unitarity method for theories of point-particle worldlines coupled to gravity, analogous to that of scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory. This method allows the computation of perturbative observables from basic principles such as locality and unitarity, thus avoiding gauge redundancies and the use of Feynman diagrams. We illustrate the method with a variety of examples, including the gravitational waveform for the scattering of two point masses at next-to-leading order (or ${\cal O}(G^{5/2})$), reproducing known results. Our method further streamlines the calculation of the scattering dynamics of compact binary systems and opens the door to further applications and systematical exploration of structure in this class of observables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.00989 by Julio Parra-Martinez, Vincent F. He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schwinger-Keldysh contour for in-in correlators. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The amplitudes factorize into products of sub-amplitudes upon cutting an internal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Factorization of worldline amplitudes upon cutting the complex energies. The thick [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The cut topologies for A(h1, h2, h3) with the cut-collapsing procedure. In our termi￾nology, the arrows point from the parent topology to the child topology. III. However, here we will pretend that we have no information about any of the sub-amplitudes so that we can illustrate the procedure to cut multiple worldline propagators at the same time. Note that this figure only contains one representative diagr… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maximal cut topologies for the waveform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Next-to-maximal cut topologies for the waveform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Next-to-next-to-maximal cut topologies for the waveform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

  2. Weak-field waveforms for generic relativistic orbits

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Outlines a Schwinger-Keldysh path-integral framework that derives worldline equations of motion and computes weak-field gravitational waveforms independently for unspecified relativistic orbits.

  3. Manifest symplecticity in classical scattering

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0

    The on-shell action and the exponential scattering generator differ as functions, but the on-shell action of the true Hamiltonian equals the on-shell action of the generator treated as a unit-time effective Hamiltonian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 84 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [3]

    Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors,

    M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster, “Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 2, (2020) 023151,arXiv:1912.10055 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  2. [4]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,

    T. Damour, “High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 4, (2018) 044038,arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [5]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 25, (2018) 251101,arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [6]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122no. 20, (2019) 201603, arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [7]

    Revisiting the second post-Minkowskian eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,

    A. Koemans Collado, P. Di Vecchia, and R. Russo, “Revisiting the second post-Minkowskian eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,”Phys. Rev. D100 no. 6, (2019) 066028,arXiv:1904.02667 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [8]

    Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory,”JHEP10(2019) 206, arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [9]

    Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,

    T. Damour, “Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 024060,arXiv:1912.02139 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [10]

    Second-order Post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions,

    A. Cristofoli, P. H. Damgaard, P. Di Vecchia, and C. Heissenberg, “Second-order Post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions,”JHEP07(2020) 122, arXiv:2003.10274 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [11]

    Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,

    T. Damour, “Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order inG,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 12, (2020) 124008,arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [12]

    Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, “Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics,”JHEP11(2020) 106,arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [13]

    From amplitudes to gravitational radiation with cubic interactions and tidal effects,

    M. Accettulli Huber, A. Brandhuber, S. De Angelis, and G. Travaglini, “From amplitudes to gravitational radiation with cubic interactions and tidal effects,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 4, (2021) 045015,arXiv:2012.06548 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [14]

    Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4),”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 16, (2022) 161103,arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [15]

    Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G4),

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G4),”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 17, (2021) 171601,arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [16]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Reverse Unitarity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 20, (2021) 201602, arXiv:2101.07255 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [17]

    Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems,”Phys. Lett. B818(2021) 136379,arXiv:2101.05772 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [18]

    The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G3),

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, “The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G3),”JHEP07(2021) 169, arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [19]

    Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G3) from scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G3) from scattering amplitudes,”JHEP10(2021) 148, arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [20]

    Classical gravity from loop amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, “Classical gravity from loop amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 026009,arXiv:2104.04510 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [21]

    The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, “The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,”JHEP08(2021) 172, arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [22]

    Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 20, (2021) 201103,arXiv:2101.12688 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [23]

    Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Dynamics of binary systems to fourth Post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach,”Phys. Lett. B831 (2022) 137203,arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [24]

    Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, “Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,”JHEP10(2021) 118,arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [25]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion,

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expansion,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 16, (2022) 161104,arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [26]

    Waveforms from amplitudes,

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell, “Waveforms from amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 5, (2022) 056007,arXiv:2107.10193 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [27]

    Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,

    A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway, and C.-H. Shen, “Radiated Angular Momentum and Dissipative Effects in Classical Scattering,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 12, (2022) 121601, arXiv:2203.04283 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [28]

    Scattering amplitudes and conservative dynamics at the fourth post-Minkowskian order,

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, “Scattering amplitudes and conservative dynamics at the fourth post-Minkowskian order,”PoSLL2022(2022) 051

    2022

  27. [29]

    Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, “Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 10, (2023) 101401,arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [30]

    The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,”JHEP06(2023) 004,arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [31]

    An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and R. Russo, “An eikonal-inspired approach to the gravitational scattering waveform,”JHEP03(2024) 089,arXiv:2312.07452 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [32]

    One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,”JHEP06(2023) 048,arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [33]

    Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,

    L. Barack et al., “Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 2, (2023) 024025, arXiv:2304.09200 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [34]

    Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem,

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, “Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem,”JHEP08(2023) 109,arXiv:2304.01275 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [35]

    Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, “Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,”JHEP09(2023) 183, arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [36]

    Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, “Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 9, (2024) 091402,arXiv:2308.14832 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [37]

    Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space,

    D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon, “Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space,”JHEP03(2024) 125,arXiv:2308.15304 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [38]

    Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field Theory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3),

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, “Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field Theory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3),”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 13, (2024) 131401,arXiv:2401.08752 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 159901 (2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [39]

    The Born regime of gravitational amplitudes,

    M. Correia and G. Isabella, “The Born regime of gravitational amplitudes,”JHEP03 (2025) 144,arXiv:2406.13737 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [40]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, “Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 24, (2024) 241402,arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [41]

    Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO(G5), and loop integration,

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, “Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO(G5), and loop integration,”JHEP10(2024) 023,arXiv:2406.01554 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  40. [42]

    Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory,

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, “Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory,” JHEP10(2024) 005,arXiv:2406.14770 [hep-th]. 34

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [43]

    Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, “Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering,”Nature641no. 8063, (2025) 603–607,arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),

    C. Heissenberg, “Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4),”Phys. Rev. D111no. 12, (2025) 126012,arXiv:2501.02904 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [45]

    Gravitational Wave Scattering via the Born Series: Scalar Tidal Matching toO(G7)and Beyond,

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, “Gravitational Wave Scattering via the Born Series: Scalar Tidal Matching toO(G7)and Beyond,”arXiv:2503.13593 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [46]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms,”arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [47]

    Nonlinear Gravitational Memory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg, and J. Parra-Martinez, “Nonlinear Gravitational Memory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,”arXiv:2506.20733 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [48]

    Radiated Angular Momentum from Spinning Black Hole Scattering Trajectories,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and K. Stoldt, “Radiated Angular Momentum from Spinning Black Hole Scattering Trajectories,”arXiv:2506.20643 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [49]

    Spinning the Probe in Kerr with WQFT,

    J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen, and J. Plefka, “Spinning the Probe in Kerr with WQFT,” arXiv:2506.14626 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [50]

    Second-order self-force potential-region binary dynamics atO(G5)in supergravity,

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, “Second-order self-force potential-region binary dynamics atO(G5)in supergravity,”arXiv:2509.17412 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  49. [51]

    On gravitational motion,

    B. Bertotti, “On gravitational motion,”Nuovo Cim.4no. 4, (1956) 898–906

    1956

  50. [52]

    The Lorentz-covariant approximation method in general relativity I,

    R. P. Kerr, “The Lorentz-covariant approximation method in general relativity I,”Nuovo Cim.13no. 3, (1959) 469–491

    1959

  51. [53]

    Theory of gravitational perturbations in the fast motion approximation,

    B. Bertotti and J. Plebanski, “Theory of gravitational perturbations in the fast motion approximation,”Annals Phys.11no. 2, (1960) 169–200

    1960

  52. [54]

    Momentum and angular momentum of two gravitating particles,

    M. Portilla, “Momentum and angular momentum of two gravitating particles,”J. Phys. A12(1979) 1075–1090. 35

    1979

  53. [55]

    Gravitational scattering of two relativistic particles in postlinear approximation,

    K. Westpfahl and M. Goller, “Gravitational scattering of two relativistic particles in postlinear approximation,”Lett. Nuovo Cim.26(1979) 573–576

    1979

  54. [56]

    Scattering of two gravitating particles: classical approach,

    M. Portilla, “Scattering of two gravitating particles: classical approach,”J. Phys. A13 (1980) 3677–3683

    1980

  55. [57]

    Poincaré-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The postlinear approximation of general relativity,

    L. Bel, T. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibanez, and J. Martin, “Poincaré-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The postlinear approximation of general relativity,”Gen. Rel. Grav.13(1981) 963–1004

    1981

  56. [58]

    High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity,

    K. Westpfahl, “High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity,”Fortsch. Phys.33no. 8, (1985) 417–493

    1985

  57. [59]

    Relativistic Closed-Form Hamiltonian for Many-Body Gravitating Systems in the Post-Minkowskian Approximation,

    T. Ledvinka, G. Schaefer, and J. Bicak, “Relativistic Closed-Form Hamiltonian for Many-Body Gravitating Systems in the Post-Minkowskian Approximation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 251101,arXiv:0807.0214 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [60]

    An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029,arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [61]

    The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,

    R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,”Phys. Rept.633(2016) 1–104,arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [62]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory,”JHEP02(2021) 048,arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [63]

    All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, “All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory,”JHEP10(2022) 128, arXiv:2207.00569 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [64]

    G. U. Jakobsen,Gravitational Scattering of Compact Bodies from Worldline Quantum Field Theory. PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, Humboldt U., Berlin (main), 2023. arXiv:2308.04388 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [65]

    SUSY in the sky with gravitons,

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, “SUSY in the sky with gravitons,”JHEP01(2022) 027,arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [66]

    A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,

    F. V. Tkachov, “A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,”Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65–68. 36

    1981

  65. [67]

    Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,”Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  66. [68]

    Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,

    A. V. Kotikov, “Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,”Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158–164

    1991

  67. [69]

    Dimensionally regulated one loop integrals,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, “Dimensionally regulated one loop integrals,” Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 299–308,arXiv:hep-ph/9212308. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 318, 649 (1993)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  68. [70]

    Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions,

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, “Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions,” Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 485–518,arXiv:hep-ph/9912329

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [71]

    Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,

    J. M. Henn, “Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 251601,arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [72]

    Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals,

    J. M. Henn, “Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals,”J. Phys. A48 (2015) 153001,arXiv:1412.2296 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  71. [73]

    Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, “Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,”Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 220–256,arXiv:hep-ph/0207004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  72. [74]

    NLO Higgs boson rapidity distributions at hadron colliders,

    C. Anastasiou, L. J. Dixon, and K. Melnikov, “NLO Higgs boson rapidity distributions at hadron colliders,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.116(2003) 193–197, arXiv:hep-ph/0211141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  73. [75]

    Dilepton rapidity distribution in the Drell-Yan process at NNLO in QCD,

    C. Anastasiou, L. J. Dixon, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello, “Dilepton rapidity distribution in the Drell-Yan process at NNLO in QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.91(2003) 182002,arXiv:hep-ph/0306192

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [76]

    Soft expansion of double-real-virtual corrections to Higgs production at N3LO,

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, “Soft expansion of double-real-virtual corrections to Higgs production at N3LO,”JHEP08 (2015) 051,arXiv:1505.04110 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [77]

    Extremal black hole scattering atO(G3): graviton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differential equations,

    J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, “Extremal black hole scattering atO(G3): graviton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differential equations,”JHEP11(2020) 023,arXiv:2005.04236 [hep-th]. 37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  76. [78]

    One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, “One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,”Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, arXiv:hep-ph/9403226

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  77. [79]

    Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, “Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,”Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59–101, arXiv:hep-ph/9409265

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  78. [80]

    Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills,

    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, and B. Feng, “Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills,”Nucl. Phys. B725(2005) 275–305,arXiv:hep-th/0412103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  79. [81]

    Maximally supersymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, and D. A. Kosower, “Maximally supersymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 125020,arXiv:0705.1864 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [82]

    Manifest Ultraviolet Behavior for the Three-Loop Four-Point Amplitude of N=8 Supergravity,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, “Manifest Ultraviolet Behavior for the Three-Loop Four-Point Amplitude of N=8 Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 105019,arXiv:0808.4112 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.