Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

The extended CSST Emulator predicts the nonlinear matter power spectrum to within 1% across the entire 2σ dark-energy parameter region favoured by DESI BAO and CMB data, by replacing each target cosmology with an auxiliary model matched in

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:26 UTC pith:T6NG5BCL

load-bearing objection Useful extension of spectral equivalence with public code; the claimed ≤1% accuracy over the DESI DR2+CMB 1σ posterior is plausible but not fully established because four of the five validation runs rely on an untested cosmology-independent finite-volume correction. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.09503 v2 pith:T6NG5BCL submitted 2025-10-10 astro-ph.CO

Extending CSST Emulator to post-DESI era

Zhao Chen , Yu Yu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords dark energyw0waCDM (CPL)spectral equivalencenonlinear matter power spectrumemulatorDESI BAOweak lensingcosmological simulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

DESI's baryon acoustic oscillation measurements have hinted that dark energy's equation of state may evolve with time, rather than being a constant. To test this with weak lensing, cosmologists need fast, accurate predictions of nonlinear matter clustering for a broad range of time-varying dark energy models. This paper shows that a target w0waCDM cosmology can be replaced by a simpler 'auxiliary' cosmology that shares the same comoving distance to the last scattering surface and the same linear growth amplitude, and that the two have nearly identical nonlinear power spectra. Using this spectral equivalence, the authors extend the CSST Emulator so it covers the full DESI DR2+CMB posterior in the w0-wa plane, with ≲1% accuracy for z≤3 and k≤10 h/Mpc, validated with new simulations of extreme dark-energy models. If correct, this gives the community a validated tool to interpret Stage-IV lensing surveys in the dynamical dark energy scenario.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that spectral equivalence holds not just between a w0waCDM target and a constant-w auxiliary, but also between two full w0waCDM models, as long as at the redshift of interest the auxiliary is chosen so that its comoving distance to last scattering (Eq. 2.1) and its linear σ8(z) (Eq. 2.4) match the target's. Because the auxiliary then lies close to the target in the w0-wa plane and can be kept inside the trained range of the emulator, its predicted nonlinear 'cb' power spectrum approximates the target's to better than 1% for z≤3 and k≤10 h/Mpc, even for the most extreme DESI-posterior cosmologies such as w0=-0.11, wa=-2.68. The authors validate this on a suite of

What carries the argument

Central machinery: the spectral-equivalence method. For each target w0waCDM cosmology and each redshift z, the method solves two equations to define an auxiliary model: Eq. (2.1) fixes the auxiliary's dark-energy parameters so that the comoving distance from z to last scattering matches the target's; Eq. (2.4) fixes the auxiliary's present-day σ8 so that the linear growth amplitude agrees at z. The auxiliary's nonlinear power spectrum is then obtained from the trained CSST Emulator and used as the prediction for the target. The new step is to let the auxiliary also be a w0waCDM model (varying both w0 and wa), instead of only a constant-w model, which keeps the auxiliary inside the emulator's

Load-bearing premise

The accuracy claim inside the DESI posterior rests on a small-box correction that is assumed to be identical for every dark-energy model, even the most extreme one, where the validation already shows the largest discrepancy.

What would settle it

Run the extreme cosmology (w0=-0.11, wa=-2.68) in a 1 Gpc/h box at the same mass resolution and compare its power spectrum directly to the small-box run after the paper's correction; if the residual exceeds ~1% at k~1-10 h/Mpc, the validation is biased. Alternatively, select a w0wa model inside the 2σ region that was not among the five tested, run a fresh simulation, and compare against the extended emulator's prediction.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The extended emulator becomes a usable prediction tool for weak lensing analyses of dynamical dark energy, covering the 2σ DESI DR2+CMB w0-wa posterior at z≤3 without new simulations for every model.
  • The spectral-equivalence accuracy loss is at most ~0.5% for z≤2 and ~1% at z=3 across the 129-model suite, so percent-level forecasts can rely on it.
  • Using w0waCDM auxiliaries improves on constant-w auxiliaries: the worst low-redshift nonlinear-regime discrepancy drops from about 2% to ≲1%, because the auxiliary is closer to the target.
  • The extended applicable range fully encloses the DESI 2σ contour at all redshifts 0≤z≤3, which the original emulator range did not.
  • The method is in principle independent of the dark-energy parameterization, leaving room to apply the same trick to other equations of state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the finite-volume correction applied to the four small-box validation runs is cosmology-dependent in the nonlinear regime, the claimed ≲1% accuracy inside the DESI posterior could be optimistic by roughly a factor of two; this is directly testable by running the extreme w0=-0.11, wa=-2.68 model in a large box.
  • The equivalence between matched d_LSS and σ8 suggests that nonlinear clustering may depend on the dark-energy equation of state largely through two integrated quantities — expansion history to last scattering and linear growth normalization — implying a possible reduced-dimensional parameterization for future emulators.
  • The same spectral-equivalence trick could be applied to the other statistics the emulator project targets (halo mass function, halo clustering, lensing peaks), though the paper notes this would require new large-volume validation simulations.
  • Since the extension shrinks at high redshift (z≥2), a user combining many redshift bins should verify each bin's coverage; the paper's Figure 5 shows the 2σ ellipse is only fully enclosed when w0waCDM auxiliaries are used.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the spectral-equivalence method of Casarini et al. (2016) to map target w0waCDM cosmologies in the DESI DR2+CMB posterior onto auxiliary wCDM or w0waCDM models that match the comoving distance to last scattering (Eq. 2.1) and the linear amplitude sigma8 (Eq. 2.4). Using these auxiliary models, the paper claims the CSST Emulator can predict the nonlinear 'cb' matter power spectrum to <=1% accuracy over the 1-sigma DESI DR2+CMB region for z<=3 and k<=10 h/Mpc, with the applicable w0-wa range fully enclosing the 2-sigma contour. Validation is based on the Kun simulation suite (104/112 targets at z=3/z=0) and on five new dynamic-dark-energy simulations (dde000-dde004), four of which use 250 Mpc/h boxes corrected by a finite-volume ratio derived from dde000.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work has clear practical value for post-DESI cosmological analyses: it provides a computationally cheap route to extend an accurate emulator outside its native w0-wa range, and it makes the extension publicly available. The paper has concrete strengths: the matching procedure is specified completely by Eqs. (2.1)-(2.4); the validation uses independent N-body simulations with controlled initial phases; the emulator code is public; and the comparison is honest in the sense that the auxiliary models are set by background and linear criteria, not by fitting the nonlinear spectrum being compared. The extension from wCDM to w0waCDM auxiliary models is a useful methodological step that reduces the reliance on extrapolation at high redshift. However, the headline accuracy claim and the finite-volume correction used in the DESI-region validation are not yet established at the level stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 4.2, Section 6] The abstract states 'prediction accuracy of <=1%' over the 1-sigma DESI DR2+CMB posterior, but the validation text uses looser phrasing: Section 4.2 says 'the difference at the most nonlinear region and z=0 slightly exceeds 1%', and Section 6 says the wCDM-auxiliary version 'slightly degrades to ~2% at the lowest redshifts'. The w0wa-auxiliary version is claimed to be '<=1%' for dde002 at z=0, but no global worst-case residual or percentile definition is given for the final method. Please state precisely which z and k range the <=1% statement covers, report the maximum residual for the w0wa-auxiliary version, and define 'over the 1-sigma region' (e.g., all points inside the contour, or a fraction of the posterior).
  2. [Section 3.2, Section 4.2, Figure 4] The finite-volume correction for dde001-dde004 is the ratio P_dde000(1 Gpc)/P_dde000(250 Mpc), applied at each k and z. This assumes the finite-volume suppression is independent of w0 and wa. For dde002 (w0=-0.11, wa=-2.68), the growth history and the nonlinear scale differ substantially from dde000, so the mode-coupling contribution of missing long-wavelength modes can have a different amplitude. The paper contains no test of this cosmology-dependence. Because dde002 is the most extreme tested cosmology and shows the largest differences before the correction, the validation may be biased exactly where the claim is tightest. Please test the transferability of the correction, e.g., with a 1 Gpc/h simulation for dde002, or quantify the systematic uncertainty in the ratio as a function of (w0,wa).
  3. [Section 4.2, Section 5] The validation of the DESI-region claim uses only five simulated cosmologies, four of them near the 68% contour. The abstract claims accuracy 'over the 1-sigma region', which is a continuous set; extending point-wise validation at five locations to the whole 1-sigma posterior requires a coverage or interpolation argument that is not given. Similarly, Section 5 states that the extended w0-wa range is insensitive to the other six cosmological parameters but does not show the verification. Please either strengthen the coverage argument with additional simulations or soften the claim to the tested points, and provide the promised insensitivity check.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.2)] The notation P_mnu is unusual; please use the conventional sum m_nu and define it at first use.
  2. [Section 4.2] When multiple valid auxiliary w0waCDM solutions exist, the paper says 'Only the nearest solution... is selected' but does not define the distance metric. Please specify the metric and, ideally, show that the choice does not affect the reported residuals.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says 'Orange ellipses indicate the 68% and 95% confidence level' while the text refers to '2-sigma contours'. Please harmonize the terminology.
  4. [Section 5] The statement 'We also verify that the results are insensitive to the variations in these six cosmological parameters' is not supported by a figure, table, or reference in the current text. Please include the verification or cite a companion paper.
  5. [Section 3.2] Please state the particle mass for the 250 Mpc/h boxes explicitly to confirm that they achieve the same mass resolution as the Kun suite.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity — spectral equivalence parameters are fixed by background/linear equations and the DESI-region claim rests on new N-body simulations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The auxiliary wCDM or w0waCDM models are determined solely by Eqs. (2.1) and (2.4): matching the comoving distance to last scattering and matching the linear σ8 at each redshift. These conditions depend only on background expansion and linear growth, never on the nonlinear target power spectrum being predicted. The validation then compares the CSST Emulator's prediction for the auxiliary model against independent N-body simulations of the target cosmology. For the central DESI claim, the dde000–dde004 simulations are new runs outside the emulator's training set, so the comparison is an honest out-of-sample test. The finite-volume correction, which uses the ratio P_dde000(1 Gpc)/P_dde000(250 Mpc) to correct small-box dde001–dde004 spectra, is a fixed correction derived from one cosmology rather than a parameter fitted to the targets; it may be an untested assumption but is not a circular reduction. Section 4.1's validation inside the original CSST Emulator range uses the Kun suite simulations on which the emulator was trained, which is an in-sample test and weakens the independence of that particular check; however, it does not make the prediction equal to the input by construction because the auxiliary parameters are not derived from the target nonlinear spectra. The self-citation to the CSST Emulator ([39]) is supported by external validation against CosmicGrowth and AbacusSummit, so it is not an unverified load-bearing self-citation. Overall, no step reduces the claimed prediction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical spectral-equivalence ansatz plus the accuracy of the authors' own emulator; the validation depends on the chosen DESI-posterior cosmologies and a transferred finite-volume correction. No new physical entities are postulated; the auxiliary cosmology is a computational device.

free parameters (5)
  • σ8,eq (auxiliary linear-amplitude normalization) = per target, per redshift
    Adjusted for each auxiliary model to satisfy Eq. (2.4), enforcing equal linear σ8(z). This is a free normalization per redshift that absorbs the linear-growth difference; not fitted to the nonlinear spectrum but it sets the amplitude scale.
  • weq (wCDM auxiliary equation of state) = varies; e.g., -1.434 for dde002 at z=3.0
    Solved from the distance-matching equation (2.1) for each target and redshift; uniquely determined for constant-w auxiliaries.
  • (w0,eq, wa,eq) generalized auxiliary parameters = varies; nearest solution to target selected
    For w0waCDM auxiliaries, Eq. (2.1) admits multiple solutions; the paper selects the one nearest the target in the w0-wa plane (Section 4.2), a free choice that improves agreement (Fig. 4 vs Fig. 3).
  • Matching scale R = 8 h^-1 Mpc in σ(R,z) = 8 h^-1 Mpc
    Scale adopted for the amplitude-matching criterion (Eq. 2.4), inherited from convention; other choices would alter σ8,eq slightly.
  • dde000 fiducial parameters (Ωb, Ωm, H0, ns, σ8, Σmν) = 0.055, 0.353, 63.6, 0.964, 0.781, 0.06 eV
    Fixed to the DESI DR2+CMB best fit for the extended-range analysis (Section 5); the paper asserts insensitivity to these parameters but does not show it.
axioms (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Spectral-equivalence ansatz: equal d_LSS (Eq. 2.1) and equal linear σ8 (Eq. 2.4) imply equal nonlinear 'cb' power spectra.
    The load-bearing empirical hypothesis, validated in Section 4 against simulations but not derived from first principles; the paper itself (Section 6) notes the physical origin remains to be explored.
  • domain assumption CSST Emulator is accurate to ≲1% over its 8D training range and degrades gracefully when extrapolated (needed for weq = -1.434).
    Invoked in Sections 3.1 and 4.2; the ≲1% is claimed in the authors' prior work [39], and extrapolation validity is assumed for dde002/dde003 high-z auxiliaries.
  • ad hoc to paper Finite-volume correction ratio from dde000 (1 Gpc vs 250 Mpc box) applies to dde001-dde004.
    Section 4.2: only dde000 has both box sizes; the ratio correction is transferred to the other four cosmologies, assuming cosmology-independence of finite-volume effects.
  • domain assumption Newtonian-motion gauge treatment of massive neutrinos correctly captures 'cb' clustering.
    Section 3.1, based on refs [51,52]; standard in this line of work.
  • domain assumption Dark energy is a smooth background fluid with no perturbations; H(z) of Eqs. (2.2)-(2.3) fully describes its effect.
    Used throughout; unstated in the paper. For phantom-crossing regions (dde002 crosses w=-1), dark-energy perturbations are ignored without discussion.
  • standard math Standard FLRW background, z* as last-scattering redshift, and fixed-phase/fixed-amplitude initial conditions suppress cosmic variance.
    Assumed in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.3) and Section 3.1; common practice in emulator validation.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary w0waCDM (or wCDM) cosmology M_eq no independent evidence
    purpose: A computational proxy whose nonlinear power spectrum, predicted by the CSST Emulator, is used to approximate the target model's spectrum at each redshift.
    Not a physical postulate; a bookkeeping device inherited from C16. The w0waCDM variant is new here. Its only external check is the N-body validation in Section 4; it makes no falsifiable prediction outside the paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13695 in / 21292 out tokens · 177848 ms · 2026-08-04T10:26:40.376561+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent DESI BAO measurements have revealed a potential deviation from a cosmological constant, suggesting a dynamic nature of dark energy. To rigorously test this result, complementary probes such as weak gravitational lensing are crucial, demanding highly accurate and efficient predictions of the nonlinear matter power spectrum within the $w_0w_a$CDM framework. However, most existing emulators fail to cover the full parameter posterior from DESI DR2+CMB constraints in the $w_0\mbox{-}w_a$ plane. In this work, we extend the spectral equivalence method outlined in Casarini et al. 2016 to use auxiliary $w_0w_a$CDM models for approximating the power spectrum of a target $w_0w_a$CDM cosmology, moving beyond the previous use of $w$CDM auxiliaries. Incorporating this enhanced module, the extended CSST Emulator achieves a prediction accuracy of $\leq1\%$ over the $1\sigma$ confidence region from DESI DR2+CMB constraints for $z\leq3$, with a mild degradation in accuracy outside this posterior region. This performance is rigorously validated by additional simulations of dynamic dark energy cosmologies. The emulator's applicable parameter space has been generalized to fully encompass the $2\sigma$ region, greatly enhancing its utility for cosmological analysis in the post-DESI era.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Casarini, S.A

    L. Casarini, S.A. Bonometto, E. Tessarotto and P.S. Corasaniti,Extending the Coyote emulator to dark energy models with standard w0-wa parametrization of the equation of state,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(2016) 008 [1601.07230]. – 11 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Turner,The Road to Precision Cosmology,Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science72(2022) 1 [2201.04741]

    M.S. Turner,The Road to Precision Cosmology,Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science72(2022) 1 [2201.04741]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Riess, A.V

    A.G. Riess, A.V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, A. Diercks, P.M. Garnavich et al., Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant,Astronomical Journal116(1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R.A. Knop, P. Nugent, P.G. Castro et al., Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High-Redshift Supernovae,Astrophysical Journal517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Percival, W

    W.J. Percival, W. Sutherland, J.A. Peacock, C.M. Baugh, J. Bland-Hawthorn, T. Bridges et al.,Parameter constraints for flat cosmologies from cosmic microwave background and 2dFGRS power spectra,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society337(2002) 1068 [astro-ph/0206256]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Abbott, F.B

    T.M.C. Abbott, F.B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, J. Aleksić, S. Allam, S. Allen et al.,Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Physical Review D98(2018) 043526 [1708.01530]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astronomy and Astrophysics641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Heymans, T

    C. Heymans, T. Tröster, M. Asgari, C. Blake, H. Hildebrandt, B. Joachimi et al.,KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,Astronomy and Astrophysics646(2021) A140 [2007.15632]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Abbott, M

    T.M.C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, O. Alves, A. Amon et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Physical Review D105(2022) 023520 [2105.13549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    C. Zhao, A. Variu, M. He, D. Forero-Sánchez, A. Tamone, C.-H. Chuang et al.,The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications from multitracer BAO analysis with galaxies and voids,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society511(2022) 5492 [2110.03824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Constant

    P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra,Cosmology with a Time-Variable Cosmological “Constant”, Astrophysical Journal, Letters325(1988) L17

    1988

  12. [12]

    Ostriker and P.J

    J.P. Ostriker and P.J. Steinhardt,The observational case for a low-density Universe with a non-zero cosmological constant,Nature377(1995) 600

    1995

  13. [13]

    Peebles and B

    P.J. Peebles and B. Ratra,The cosmological constant and dark energy,Reviews of Modern Physics75(2003) 559 [astro-ph/0207347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    Ishak,Testing general relativity in cosmology,Living Reviews in Relativity22(2019) 1 [1806.10122]

    M. Ishak,Testing general relativity in cosmology,Living Reviews in Relativity22(2019) 1 [1806.10122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    S. Alam, M. Ata, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, D. Bizyaev, J.A. Blazek et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470 (2017) 2617 [1607.03155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski,Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter,International Journal of Modern Physics D10(2001) 213 [gr-qc/0009008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Linder,Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe,Physical Review Letters90 (2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512]

    E.V. Linder,Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe,Physical Review Letters90 (2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    Adame, J

    A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, M. Alvarez et al.,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 021 [2404.03002]. – 12 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Abdul-Karim, J

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen et al.,DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14738 [2503.14738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Abell, J

    LSST Science Collaboration, P.A. Abell, J. Allison, S.F. Anderson, J.R. Andrew, J.R.P. Angel et al.,LSST Science Book, Version 2.0,arXiv e-prints(2009) arXiv:0912.0201 [0912.0201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Laureijs, J

    R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J.L. Auguères, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole et al.,Euclid Definition Study Report,arXiv e-prints(2011) arXiv:1110.3193 [1110.3193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J.A

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J.A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Achúcarro, J. Adamek et al.,Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2405.13491 [2405.13491]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    O. Dore, C. Hirata, Y. Wang, D. Weinberg, T. Eifler, R.J. Foley et al.,WFIRST: The Essential Cosmology Space Observatory for the Coming Decade,Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society51(2019) 341 [1904.01174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Y. Gong, X. Liu, Y. Cao, X. Chen, Z. Fan, R. Li et al.,Cosmology from the Chinese Space Station Optical Survey (CSS-OS),Astrophysical Journal883(2019) 203 [1901.04634]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Taylor, T.D

    P.L. Taylor, T.D. Kitching and J.D. McEwen,Preparing for the cosmic shear data flood: Optimal data extraction and simulation requirements for stage IV dark energy experiments, Physical Review D98(2018) 043532 [1804.03667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Martinelli, I

    M. Martinelli, I. Tutusaus, M. Archidiacono, S. Camera, V.F. Cardone, S. Clesse et al.,Euclid: Impact of non-linear and baryonic feedback prescriptions on cosmological parameter estimation from weak lensing cosmic shear,Astronomy and Astrophysics649(2021) A100 [2010.12382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    T. Tan, D. Zürcher, J. Fluri, A. Refregier, F. Tarsitano and T. Kacprzak,Assessing theoretical uncertainties for cosmological constraints from weak lensing surveys,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society522(2023) 3766 [2207.03598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Angulo and O

    R.E. Angulo and O. Hahn,Large-scale dark matter simulations,Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics8(2022) 1 [2112.05165]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Moriwaki, T

    K. Moriwaki, T. Nishimichi and N. Yoshida,Machine learning for observational cosmology, Reports on Progress in Physics86(2023) 076901 [2303.15794]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Heitmann, M

    K. Heitmann, M. White, C. Wagner, S. Habib and D. Higdon,The Coyote Universe. I. Precision Determination of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal715 (2010) 104 [0812.1052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    Heitmann, D

    K. Heitmann, D. Higdon, M. White, S. Habib, B.J. Williams, E. Lawrence et al.,The Coyote Universe. II. Cosmological Models and Precision Emulation of the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal705(2009) 156 [0902.0429]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Lawrence, K

    E. Lawrence, K. Heitmann, M. White, D. Higdon, C. Wagner, S. Habib et al.,The Coyote Universe. III. Simulation Suite and Precision Emulator for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal713(2010) 1322 [0912.4490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Heitmann, E

    K. Heitmann, E. Lawrence, J. Kwan, S. Habib and D. Higdon,The Coyote Universe Extended: Precision Emulation of the Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal780(2014) 111 [1304.7849]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Lawrence, K

    E. Lawrence, K. Heitmann, J. Kwan, A. Upadhye, D. Bingham, S. Habib et al.,The Mira-Titan Universe. II. Matter Power Spectrum Emulation,Astrophysical Journal847 (2017) 50 [1705.03388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Moran, K

    K.R. Moran, K. Heitmann, E. Lawrence, S. Habib, D. Bingham, A. Upadhye et al.,The Mira-Titan Universe - IV. High-precision power spectrum emulation,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520(2023) 3443 [2207.12345]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Angulo, M

    R.E. Angulo, M. Zennaro, S. Contreras, G. Aricò, M. Pellejero-Ibañez and J. Stücker,The BACCO simulation project: exploiting the full power of large-scale structure for cosmology, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society507(2021) 5869 [2004.06245]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Knabenhans, J

    Euclid Collaboration, M. Knabenhans, J. Stadel, S. Marelli, D. Potter, R. Teyssier et al., Euclid preparation: II. The EUCLIDEMULATOR - a tool to compute the cosmology dependence of the nonlinear matter power spectrum,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(2019) 5509 [1809.04695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Knabenhans, J

    Euclid Collaboration, M. Knabenhans, J. Stadel, D. Potter, J. Dakin, S. Hannestad et al., Euclid preparation: IX. EuclidEmulator2 - power spectrum emulation with massive neutrinos and self-consistent dark energy perturbations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society505(2021) 2840 [2010.11288]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Z. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Han and Y. Jing,CSST cosmological emulator I: Matter power spectrum emulation with one percent accuracy to k = 10h Mpc-1,Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy68(2025) 289512 [2502.11160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Y. Yang, S. Bird and M.-F. Ho,Ten-parameter simulation suite for cosmological emulation beyondΛCDM,Physical Review D111(2025) 083529 [2501.06296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Y. Yang, S. Bird, M.-F. Ho and M. Qezlou,Ten-dimensional neural network emulator for the nonlinear matter power spectrum,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2507.07177 [2507.07177]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Linder and M

    E.V. Linder and M. White,Going nonlinear with dark energy cosmologies,Physical Review D 72(2005) 061304 [astro-ph/0508401]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    Francis, G.F

    M.J. Francis, G.F. Lewis and E.V. Linder,Power spectra to 1 per cent accuracy between dynamical dark energy cosmologies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society380 (2007) 1079 [0704.0312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [44]

    Casarini, A.V

    L. Casarini, A.V. Macciò and S.A. Bonometto,Dynamical dark energy simulations: high accuracy power spectra at high redshift,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2009 (2009) 014 [0810.0190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Casarini,High-precision spectra for dynamical Dark Energy cosmologies from constant-w models,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 005 [1006.0981]

    L. Casarini,High-precision spectra for dynamical Dark Energy cosmologies from constant-w models,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 005 [1006.0981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    McDonald, H

    P. McDonald, H. Trac and C. Contaldi,Dependence of the non-linear mass power spectrum on the equationof state of dark energy,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society366 (2006) 547 [astro-ph/0505565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Ma,The Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal665(2007) 887 [astro-ph/0610213]

    Z. Ma,The Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Astrophysical Journal665(2007) 887 [astro-ph/0610213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    Fedeli, K

    C. Fedeli, K. Dolag and L. Moscardini,Matter power spectra in dynamical dark energy cosmologies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society419(2012) 1588 [1106.3987]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Cataneo, L

    M. Cataneo, L. Lombriser, C. Heymans, A.J. Mead, A. Barreira, S. Bose et al.,On the road to percent accuracy: non-linear reaction of the matter power spectrum to dark energy and modified gravity,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society488(2019) 2121 [1812.05594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Parimbelli, C

    G. Parimbelli, C. Carbone, J. Bel, B. Bose, M. Calabrese, E. Carella et al.,DEMNUni: comparing nonlinear power spectra prescriptions in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(2022) 041 [2207.13677]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Partmann, C

    C. Partmann, C. Fidler, C. Rampf and O. Hahn,Fast simulations of cosmic large-scale structure with massive neutrinos,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020 (2020) 018 [2003.07387]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Heuschling, C

    P. Heuschling, C. Partmann and C. Fidler,A minimal model for massive neutrinos in Newtonian N-body simulations,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(2022) 068 [2201.13186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Saito, M

    S. Saito, M. Takada and A. Taruya,Impact of Massive Neutrinos on the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum,Physical Review Letters100(2008) 191301 [0801.0607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Agarwal and H.A

    S. Agarwal and H.A. Feldman,The effect of massive neutrinos on the matter power spectrum, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society410(2011) 1647 [1006.0689]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    Upadhye, R

    A. Upadhye, R. Biswas, A. Pope, K. Heitmann, S. Habib, H. Finkel et al.,Large-scale structure formation with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy,Physical Review D89(2014) 103515 [1309.5872]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    Castorina, C

    E. Castorina, C. Carbone, J. Bel, E. Sefusatti and K. Dolag,DEMNUni: the clustering of large-scale structures in the presence of massive neutrinos,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2015(2015) 043 [1505.07148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Heitmann, D

    K. Heitmann, D. Bingham, E. Lawrence, S. Bergner, S. Habib, D. Higdon et al.,The Mira-Titan Universe: Precision Predictions for Dark Energy Surveys,Astrophysical Journal 820(2016) 108 [1508.02654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Chen and Y

    Z. Chen and Y. Yu,CSST cosmological emulator II: Generalized accurate halo mass function emulation,Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy68(2025) 109513 [2506.09688]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    S. Zhou, Z. Chen and Y. Yu,CSST Cosmological Emulator III: Hybrid Lagrangian Bias Expansion Emulation of Galaxy Clustering,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.04671 [2506.04671]

    arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    J. Han, M. Li, W. Jiang, Z. Chen, H. Wang, C. Wei et al.,The Jiutian simulations for the CSST extra-galactic surveys,Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy68(2025) 109511 [2503.21368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Sobol,The distribution of points in a cube and the accurate evaluation of integrals (in russian) zh,Vychisl

    I. Sobol,The distribution of points in a cube and the accurate evaluation of integrals (in russian) zh,Vychisl. Mat. i Mater. Phys7(1967) 784

    1967

  62. [62]

    Springel, R

    V. Springel, R. Pakmor, O. Zier and M. Reinecke,Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(2021) 2871 [2010.03567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Angulo and A

    R.E. Angulo and A. Pontzen,Cosmological N-body simulations with suppressed variance, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society462(2016) L1 [1603.05253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Jing,CosmicGrowth Simulations—Cosmological simulations for structure growth studies, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy62(2019) 19511 [1807.06802]

    Y. Jing,CosmicGrowth Simulations—Cosmological simulations for structure growth studies, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy62(2019) 19511 [1807.06802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Maksimova, L.H

    N.A. Maksimova, L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and T.P. Satterthwaite,ABACUSSUMMIT: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2021) 4017 [2110.11398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics10(1974) 363

    G.W. Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics10(1974) 363

    1974

  67. [67]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov and P.J. Steinhardt,Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cosmological Constant and Late-Time Cosmic Acceleration,Physical Review Letters 85(2000) 4438 [astro-ph/0004134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    Dvali, G

    G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati,4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space,Physics Letters B485(2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    W. Cui, P. Zhang and X. Yang,Nonlinearities in modified gravity cosmology: Signatures of modified gravity in the nonlinear matter power spectrum,Physical Review D81(2010) 103528 [1001.5184]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010