Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Cold nuclear matter pulls the chi_cJ(1P) charmonia down by 30-100 MeV, with the vector-vector loop dominating the chi_c2 shift.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:19 UTC pith:N263V5LP

load-bearing objection Solid QMC-loop calculation that finally includes the D*Dbar* channel for the chi_cJ triplet; the headline '~60 MeV' is a band, and the bare-core assumption needs a caveat. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.10200 v1 pith:N263V5LP submitted 2025-10-11 hep-ph nucl-th

Medium modifications of 1P-wave charmonia chi_(cJ)(1P) in cold nuclear matter

Ze-Hua Zhang , Xiang Liu This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords P-wave charmoniacold nuclear matterquark-meson coupling modelin-medium mass shifthadronic loopvector-vector channellevel crossingJ/psi suppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Inside cold nuclear matter, the three P-wave charmonium states chi_c0, chi_c1, and chi_c2 lose mass—roughly 34-59, 45-69, and 64-97 MeV respectively at normal nuclear density, depending on a form-factor cutoff. The paper argues that the shifts are state-dependent and that for chi_c2 the dominant source is the vector-vector hadronic loop formed by a D* and an anti-D*, a contribution earlier treatments deliberately dropped. It further claims that with these shifts the in-medium chi_cJ masses remain below the D Dbar threshold up to three times normal nuclear density, so the classic level-crossing picture that would produce stepwise J/psi suppression does not occur. The results matter because about 40% of observed J/psi comes from chi_cJ feed-down, so density-dependent P-wave charmonium masses are a direct input for interpreting quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions.

Core claim

The paper's central result is that the unquenched one-loop self-energies of the chi_cJ(1P) triplet, evaluated with density-modified D and D* masses from the quark-meson coupling model, produce in-medium mass shifts of about -34 to -59 MeV (chi_c0), -45 to -69 MeV (chi_c1), and -64 to -97 MeV (chi_c2) at normal nuclear matter density for the cutoff parameter alpha between 2 and 4. The D* Dbar* loop, which had been omitted in earlier QMC studies of quarkonia, provides the largest single contribution for chi_c2, because chi_c2 couples to that channel in S-wave while its coupling to D Dbar is D-wave. As a consequence, the in-medium chi_cJ masses stay below the D Dbar threshold for baryon density

What carries the argument

The quark-meson coupling (QMC) model, which derives density-dependent D and D* masses by self-consistently coupling the scalar sigma mean field to light quarks inside bags, provides the in-medium input; the unquenched self-energy machinery then converts those open-charm mass shifts into chi_cJ shifts through one-loop diagrams of D Dbar, D* Dbar, D Dbar*, and D* Dbar*, regulated by dipole form factors with cutoff Lambda = m_E + alpha*220 MeV. The load-bearing loop is the vector-vector (D* Dbar*) one: because chi_c2 couples to it in S-wave but to D Dbar in D-wave, the previously neglected D* Dbar* diagram is what makes the chi_c2 shift the largest of the triplet. The self-consistency condition

Load-bearing premise

The entire prediction inherits the quark-meson-coupling model's density dependence for D and D* mesons—a drop of about 62 MeV at rho0 with a specified behavior up to 3 rho0—so if the open-charm masses in matter differ from that input, the computed chi_cJ shifts and the no-crossing conclusion shift with them.

What would settle it

Measure chi_c2 production in proton-nucleus collisions over a range of centralities or beam energies, or compute the D and D* masses in nuclear matter at 2-3 rho0 on the lattice; if chi_c2 crosses the D Dbar threshold below 3 rho0, or if the D* mass drop deviates substantially from the ~62 MeV QMC value, the paper's central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Analyses of quarkonium production in proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions should take chi_cJ masses in matter to be 30-100 MeV lighter than their vacuum values, changing the phase space available for feed-down decays to J/psi.
  • The no-level-crossing result up to 3 rho0 weakens the hadronic-dissociation scenario in which the D Dbar threshold slides below each P-wave charmonium in turn and produces a stepwise suppression pattern.
  • The D* Dbar* loop can no longer be dropped from QMC-based medium calculations; for chi_c2 it is the dominant term, and for chi_c0 it contributes nontrivially even though the D Dbar loop is still larger.
  • The triplet shifts are ordered chi_c2 > chi_c1 > chi_c0, a hierarchy that differs from the nearly degenerate ~-60 MeV shifts predicted by QCD sum-rule analyses, giving experiments a way to distinguish the two pictures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the QMC open-charm mass shifts are replaced by lattice or empirical values at 2-3 rho0, the chi_c2 prediction—the largest and most D*D*-sensitive—would be the first to break, making the D* shift at high density a decisive test.
  • The temperature dependence, which the authors defer to future work, could quickly restore level crossing in heavy-ion collisions where density and temperature coexist; a finite-T extension would tell whether the no-crossing result survives in realistic collision conditions.
  • The same vector-vector loop logic should apply to other P-wave and higher excited charmonia (e.g., h_c or the 2P states) and to B_c mesons in matter, where the previously neglected D*D* or B*B* loops could shift the predicted bound-state energies with nuclei.
  • The alpha=2-4 spread (a factor of ~1.7-2 in total shifts) marks the main theoretical uncertainty; fixing alpha with an independent observable, such as the X(3872) line shape or B-decay data, could convert the predicted range into a sharper benchmark.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the in-medium mass shifts of the 1P-wave charmonia chi_cJ(1P) (J=0,1,2) in cold symmetric nuclear matter. The framework combines the quark-meson coupling (QMC) model—which supplies density-dependent D and D* masses—with hadronic one-loop self-energies for chi_cJ from D Dbar, D Dbar*, D* Dbar, and D* Dbar* intermediate states. The bare masses M0 are fixed by reproducing the vacuum masses through Eq. (27), and the in-medium masses are obtained self-consistently from Eq. (15). The central results are mass shifts at normal nuclear matter density of -33.6 to -58.8 MeV (chi_c0), -44.9 to -68.6 MeV (chi_c1), and -63.9 to -97.4 MeV (chi_c2) for the free cutoff parameter alpha=2-4. The authors emphasize the importance of the vector-vector D* Dbar* loop, especially for chi_c2, and claim the absence of level crossing between the in-medium chi_cJ masses and the D Dbar threshold up to rho_B < 3 rho_0, which they connect to sequential J/psi suppression and experiments at FAIR and RHIC.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the paper provides a concrete, state-dependent prediction for P-wave charmonia in cold nuclear matter, going beyond earlier QMC studies that omitted the vector-vector channel. The calculation is transparent and internally consistent: the self-energy expressions are given explicitly, the bare masses are defined through Eq. (27), and the density dependence is taken from an established QMC parametrization. The emphasis on the D* Dbar* loop for chi_c2 is a useful qualitative insight. However, the conclusions rest on the assumption that the bare charm-quark core mass is medium-independent, an assumption that is not validated and may omit or double-count a direct gluon-condensate effect of the same size as the entire predicted shift. The quantitative predictions are also presented as an 'about 60 MeV' band that hides a factor-of-two cutoff dependence, and the no-crossing claim is only explicitly demonstrated for chi_c2.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, paragraph after Eq. (27)] The statement that the bare masses M0 are 'assumed to remain unaffected by medium modifications due to their purely heavy-quark composition' is load-bearing: all density dependence enters through the QMC-modified D(*) masses in Eq. (16). However, the paper itself cites Refs. [83-87], which find a direct in-medium chi_cJ shift of about -60 MeV from the gluon condensate. That effect is of the same order as the entire predicted shift and cannot be generated by the QMC bag Hamiltonian, where charm quarks do not couple to sigma/omega mean fields. Either the calculation omits a comparable contribution to M0(ρ), or the QCD-sum-rule result already contains the hadronic-loop piece, in which case there is a double-counting risk. Please add a quantitative estimate of M0(ρ) from the cited sum-rule framework or demonstrate explicitly why the gluon-condensate term is absent.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. III] The abstract's 'significant mass reductions of about 60 MeV' hides a factor-of-two spread in the free cutoff alpha. At rho_0 the computed ranges are -33.6 to -58.8 MeV (chi_c0), -44.9 to -68.6 MeV (chi_c1), and -63.9 to -97.4 MeV (chi_c2). The quantity 'about 60 MeV' is not a single prediction but a band over an unconstrained parameter alpha=2-4. The abstract should quote the ranges, or the cutoff should be constrained by additional observables, before claiming a universal 60 MeV shift.
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 7] The no-level-crossing claim is made for all chi_cJ(1P) up to rho_B<3rho_0, but the explicit comparison with the in-medium D Dbar threshold is shown only for chi_c2 (Fig. 7). For chi_c0 and chi_c1, the total-effect figures (Figs. 4c and 5b) do not include the threshold curve. Given that the QMC D-meson mass shift may not scale linearly with density, the reader cannot verify the three-state claim. Please provide analogous threshold comparisons or a table of M*_chi_cJ and 2m_D^* at rho_0, 2rho_0, and 3rho_0.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV] The summary states that the vector-vector channel 'yields a substantial mass shift for chi_c0(1P) and chi_c2(1P).' However, Fig. 4(b) shows that the D* Dbar* loop alone contributes only -5.6 to -18.2 MeV for chi_c0, which is smaller than the DD loop. Please rephrase to avoid overstating the chi_c0 vector-vector effect.
  2. [Sec. II around Eq. (14)] The sentence about D_s mesons reads 'D(∗)+ s mesons ... the same applies to D(∗)− s meson'; please correct the notation and clarify that the D_s^(*) channels are excluded from the loop sums.
  3. [Sec. III, paragraph after Fig. 6] The sentence 'The contribution from the D Dbar, D Dbar* or D*Dbar loops alone is less significant for chi_c0(1P) or chi_c1(1P)' is syntactically confusing; it should state relative to which channel (e.g., 'less significant than the D*Dbar* loop for chi_c2').
  4. [Sec. III, Table II and Figs. 4-6] The decomposition into individual loop contributions uses a different bare mass for each loop. The paper cautions about this, but the figures and table could mislead readers into interpreting the curves as additive partial contributions. A sentence in each figure caption noting that 'loop alone' means the counterfactual with the corresponding M0 from Table II would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the in-medium χcJ shifts are a genuine one-loop prediction conditional on external QMC charmed-meson masses and QCD-sum-rule couplings.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Eq. (27) fixes the bare mass M0 so that the free-space one-loop expression reproduces the PDG χcJ masses; this is a renormalization/fitting step, and the quantity later called a prediction, ΔMχcJ = M*χcJ − MχcJ (Eq. (29)), is not used in that fit. The medium effect enters only through the QMC in-medium D(∗) masses, taken from Ref. [91] (Table I: −62.4/−62.1 MeV at ρ0), an external model input rather than a fit to χcJ data. With M0 held fixed, Eqs. (15)–(26) are a genuine one-loop evaluation. The no-level-crossing conclusion is nontrivial: using only the DD loop, the same framework produces a crossing (Fig. 7(a)), so the full result is not forced by construction. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [107,116,119]) supply the vertex Lagrangian and the α-scan convention, but these are standard HQET forms with independent sources (Refs. [108,117]) and are not used to import the target in-medium mass shift. The assumption that M0 is density-independent and the omission of a possible gluon-condensate shift are physical/model-completeness caveats, not identity reductions; the scanned parameter α only widens the quoted band. Under the stated rules, none of the paper's central claims reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced; the calculation uses established χcJ, D, and D* degrees of freedom. The main model load-bearing input is the QMC prediction for in-medium open-charm meson masses, plus a free cutoff parameter. These are listed above.

free parameters (3)
  • Cutoff parameter α = 2, 3, 4 (scanned, not fitted)
    Sets the form-factor cutoff Λ = m_E + α Λ_QCD (Sec. III). Mass shifts vary by roughly a factor of 2 across this range; α is not constrained by data in the paper.
  • Gauge coupling g_P / f_χc0 = f_χc0 = 0.51 GeV; g_P = −√(m_χc0/3)/f_χc0
    Taken from QCD sum rules (Refs. [108,117]) and sets the overall strength of all loop couplings via Eq. (28). Changing this value scales all mass shifts.
  • QMC bag parameters (B, z_N, z_D, z_D*, R_N, R_D, R_D*, g_q^σ, g_q^ω) = B=(170 MeV)^4; z_N=3.295, z_D=1.388, z_D*=0.849; R_N=0.8 fm; R_D=0.731 fm, R_D*=0.774 fm; g_q^σ=5.69, g_q^ω=2.72
    Fixed by fitting nucleon and charmed-meson vacuum masses and nuclear saturation properties (Sec. II, Table I). They determine the in-medium D and D* mass shifts that drive the whole calculation.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption QMC mean-field approximation for infinite nuclear matter
    Eqs. (1)–(2): meson fields treated as classical mean fields; standard for QMC, not derived here.
  • domain assumption MIT bag model with linear boundary condition
    Eqs. (4)–(10): used to compute in-medium hadron masses. This is a phenomenological model, not derived from QCD.
  • domain assumption OZI rule: χcJ couples to nuclear matter only via D(*)D̄(*) loops
    Sec. II first paragraph: heavy quarks do not couple directly to light mesons. If broken, direct σ/ω couplings to the charmonium core would add shifts.
  • ad hoc to paper Bare charmonium masses are medium-independent
    Sec. II, around Eq. (27): M0_χcJ computed in vacuum is 'assumed to remain unaffected by medium modifications'. This is an assumption, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Dipole form factor with Λ = m_E + α Λ_QCD
    Eq. (16) and Sec. III: the regularization scheme is a modeling choice, and α is scanned rather than fixed.
  • domain assumption Neglect of widths and use of real part of self-energy
    Sec. II: 'we neglect the possible widths of χcJ(1P) and D(*) mesons when treating them as vacuum inputs.' Affects the extraction of the real mass shift.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19186 in / 18837 out tokens · 161254 ms · 2026-08-04T10:19:31.965013+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we employ the quark-meson coupling model to investigate the mass shifts of $1P$-wave charmonia $\chi_{cJ}(1P)$ ($J=0,1,2$) in cold symmetric nuclear matter by incorporating in-medium loop contributions to the $\chi_{cJ}(1P)$ self-energy within the unquenched picture. At normal nuclear matter density, we obtain significant mass reductions of about 60 MeV for the $\chi_{cJ}(1P)$ states, with the $\chi_{c2}(1P)$ mass shift primarily arising from the vector-vector loop. Our results also indicate the absence of level crossing between the in-medium $\chi_{cJ}(1P)$ mass and the $D\bar{D}$ mass threshold up to $\rho_B < 3\rho_0$-a feature that could be probed in the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR and the Beam Energy Scan program at RHIC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.10200 by Xiang Liu, Ze-Hua Zhang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the charmed-meson loop contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the charmed-meson loop contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic diagram showing the charmed-meson loop con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mass shift of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Mass shift of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The mass di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Absorption of 1$P$-wave heavy charmonium $\chi_{c1}(1P)$ in nuclei

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Calculations of excitation functions, momentum spectra, and transparency ratios for χ_c1(1P) on 12C and 184W nuclei demonstrate sensitivity to different absorption cross-section scenarios, proposed for extraction via ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 86 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, Charmonium: Comparison with experiment, Phys. Rev. D21, 203 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985)

    1985

  3. [3]

    M. B. V oloshin, Charmonium, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.61, 455 (2008), arXiv:0711.4556 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Brambillaet al., Heavy Quarkonium: Progress, puz- zles, and opportunities, Eur

    N. Brambillaet al., Heavy Quarkonium: Progress, puz- zles, and opportunities, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1534 (2011), arXiv:1010.5827 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Y . S. Kalashnikova, Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option forX(3872), Phys. Rev. D72, 034010 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506270

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Chao, Interpretations for theX(4160) observed in the double charm production at B factories, Phys

    K.-T. Chao, Interpretations for theX(4160) observed in the double charm production at B factories, Phys. Lett. B661, 348 (2008), arXiv:0707.3982 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Li and K.-T

    B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher Charmonia andX,Y,Zstates with screened potential, Phys. Rev. D79, 094004 (2009), arXiv:0903.5506 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Duan, S.-Q

    M.-X. Duan, S.-Q. Luo, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Possibility of charmoniumlike stateX(3915) asχ c0(2P) state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054029 (2020), arXiv:2002.03311 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Saito, K

    K. Saito, K. Tsushima, and A. W. Thomas, Nucleon and hadron structure changes in the nuclear medium and impact on observables, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.58, 1 (2007), arXiv:hep- ph/0506314

    arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Hyodo, K. Sudoh, Y . Yamaguchi, and S. Yasui, Heavy hadrons in nuclear matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.96, 88 (2017), arXiv:1606.08685 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Krein, A

    G. Krein, A. W. Thomas, and K. Tsushima, Nuclear-bound quarkonia and heavy-flavor hadrons, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 161 (2018), arXiv:1706.02688 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Rothkopf, Heavy quarkonium in extreme conditions, Phys

    A. Rothkopf, Heavy quarkonium in extreme conditions, Phys. Rept.858, 1 (2020), arXiv:1912.02253 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    S. J. Brodsky, I. Schmidt, and G. F. de T ´eramond, Nuclear- bound quarkonium, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1011 (1990)

    1990

  14. [14]

    D. A. Wasson, Comment on ‘Nuclear bound quarkonium.’, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 2237 (1991)

    1991

  15. [15]

    A. B. Kaidalov and P. E. V olkovitsky, Heavy quarkonia inter- actions with nucleons and nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3155 (1992)

    1992

  16. [16]

    V . B. Belyaev, N. V . Shevchenko, A. I. Fix, and W. Sand- has, Binding of charmonium with two- and three-body nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A780, 100 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0601058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    Tsushima, D

    K. Tsushima, D. H. Lu, G. Krein, and A. W. Thomas, J/Ψ-nuclear bound states, Phys. Rev. C83, 065208 (2011), arXiv:1103.5516 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Yokota, E

    A. Yokota, E. Hiyama, and M. Oka, Possible existence of charmonium-nucleus bound states, PTEP2013, 113D01 (2013), arXiv:1308.6102 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Yokota, E

    A. Yokota, E. Hiyama, and M. Oka, Possible existence of (c¯c)- nucleus bound states, Few Body Syst.55, 761 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Choet al.(ExHIC), Multi-quark hadrons from heavy ion collisions, Phys

    S. Choet al.(ExHIC), Multi-quark hadrons from heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 212001 (2011), arXiv:1011.0852 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Choet al.(ExHIC), Studying exotic hadrons in heavy ion collisions, Phys

    S. Choet al.(ExHIC), Studying exotic hadrons in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C84, 064910 (2011), arXiv:1107.1302 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Cho and S

    S. Cho and S. H. Lee, Hadronic effects on theX(3872) meson abundance in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C88, 054901 (2013), arXiv:1302.6381 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    L. M. Abreu, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, F. S. Navarra, and M. Nielsen,X(3872) production and absorp- tion in a hot hadron gas, Phys. Lett. B761, 303 (2016), arXiv:1604.07716 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Choet al.(ExHIC), Exotic hadrons from heavy ion collisions, Prog

    S. Choet al.(ExHIC), Exotic hadrons from heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.95, 279 (2017), arXiv:1702.00486 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Azizi and N

    K. Azizi and N. Er,X(3872): propagating in a dense medium, Nucl. Phys. B936, 151 (2018), arXiv:1710.02806 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Liao, E. Wang, Q. Wang, and H. Xing, Decipher- ing the nature ofX(3872) in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 012301 (2021), arXiv:2004.00024 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Albaladejo, J

    M. Albaladejo, J. M. Nieves, and L. Tolos,D ¯D∗ scattering and χc1(3872) in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C104, 035203 (2021), arXiv:2102.08589 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Z. Tang, B. Wu, A. Hanlon, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and R. Rapp, Quarkonium spectroscopy in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 142302 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    R. Rapp, D. Blaschke, and P. Crochet, Charmonium and bottomonium production in heavy-ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.65, 209 (2010), arXiv:0807.2470 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  30. [30]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz,J/ψSuppression by quark-gluon plasma formation, Phys. Lett. B178, 416 (1986)

    1986

  31. [31]

    Guichon, A possible quark mechanism for the saturation of nuclear matter, Physics Letters B200, 235 (1988)

    P. Guichon, A possible quark mechanism for the saturation of nuclear matter, Physics Letters B200, 235 (1988)

    1988

  32. [32]

    P. A. Guichon, K. Saito, E. Rodionov, and A. W. Thomas, The role of nucleon structure in finite nuclei, Nuclear Physics A 601, 349 (1996)

    1996

  33. [33]

    Rikovska-Stone, P

    J. Rikovska-Stone, P. A. M. Guichon, H. H. Matevosyan, and A. W. Thomas, Cold uniform matter and neutron stars in the quark-mesons-coupling model, Nucl. Phys. A792, 341 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0611030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    Krein, A

    G. Krein, A. W. Thomas, and K. Tsushima,J/Ψmass shift in nuclear matter, Phys. Lett. B697, 136 (2011), arXiv:1007.2220 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Wang, D.-Y

    J.-Z. Wang, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Construct- ingJ/ψfamily with updated data of charmoniumlikeYstates, Phys. Rev. D99, 114003 (2019), arXiv:1903.07115 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Wang, R.-Q

    J.-Z. Wang, R.-Q. Qian, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Are theY states around 4.6 GeV frome +e− annihilation higher char- monia?, Phys. Rev. D101, 034001 (2020), arXiv:2001.00175 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    van Beveren and G

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, ObservedD s(2317) and ten- tativeD(2100–2300) as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012003 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0305035

    arXiv 2003

  38. [38]

    Dai, C.-S

    Y .-B. Dai, C.-S. Huang, C. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Understanding theD + sJ(2317) andD + sJ(2460) with sum rules in HQET, Phys. Rev. D68, 114011 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306274. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    D. S. Hwang and D.-W. Kim, Mass ofD ∗ sJ(2317) and cou- pled channel effect, Phys. Lett. B601, 137 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0408154

    arXiv 2004

  40. [40]

    Y . A. Simonov and J. A. Tjon, The Coupled-channel analysis of theDandD s mesons, Phys. Rev. D70, 114013 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0409361

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    I. V . Danilkin and Y . A. Simonov, Dynamical origin and the pole structure ofX(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 102002 (2010), arXiv:1006.0211 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    B.-Q. Li, C. Meng, and K.-T. Chao, Coupled-channel and screening effects in charmonium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D80, 014012 (2009), arXiv:0904.4068 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    S.-Q. Luo, B. Chen, Z.-W. Liu, and X. Liu, Resolving the low mass puzzle ofΛ c(2940)+, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 301 (2020), arXiv:1910.14545 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Huang, R

    Q. Huang, R. Chen, J. He, and X. Liu, Discovering a novel dynamics mechanism for charmonium scattering (2024), arXiv:2407.16316 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Qian, F.-L

    R.-Q. Qian, F.-L. Wang, and X. Liu, Finding interaction mechanism between exotic molecule and conventional hadron, Phys. Lett. B862, 139329 (2025), arXiv:2409.14392 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    J. J. Cobos-Mart ´ınez, K. Tsushima, G. Krein, and A. W. Thomas,η c-nucleus bound states, Phys. Lett. B811, 135882 (2020), arXiv:2007.04476 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    G. N. Zeminiani, J. J. Cobos-Martinez, and K. Tsushima,Υ andη b mass shifts in nuclear matter, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 259 (2021), arXiv:2012.11381 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    J. J. Cobos-Mart ´ınez, G. N. Zeminiani, and K. Tsushima,Υ andη b nuclear bound states, Phys. Rev. C105, 025204 (2022), arXiv:2201.05696 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    G. N. Zeminiani, J. J. Cobos-Mart ´ınez, and K. Tsushima,B ± c - 12Cstates and detailed study of the momentum-space method forΥ- andη b-nucleus bound states, Phys. Rev. C111, 055202 (2025), arXiv:2406.11114 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    G. N. Zeminiani, S. L. P. G. Beres, and K. Tsushima, In- medium mass shift of two-flavored heavy mesons,B c,B ∗ c, Bs,B ∗ s,D s, andD ∗ s, Phys. Rev. D110, 094045 (2024), arXiv:2401.00250 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Antoniazziet al.(E705), A measurement ofJ/ψandψ ′ production in 300 GeV/c Proton, antiproton andπ ± nucleon interactions, Phys

    L. Antoniazziet al.(E705), A measurement ofJ/ψandψ ′ production in 300 GeV/c Proton, antiproton andπ ± nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. D46, 4828 (1992)

    1992

  52. [52]

    Antoniazziet al.(E705), Production ofJ/ψviaψ ′ andχ decay in 300 GeV/c proton andπ± nucleon interactions, Phys

    L. Antoniazziet al.(E705), Production ofJ/ψviaψ ′ andχ decay in 300 GeV/c proton andπ± nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 383 (1993)

    1993

  53. [53]

    Goninet al.(NA50), AnomalousJ/ψsuppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 158×GeV/c, Nucl

    M. Goninet al.(NA50), AnomalousJ/ψsuppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 158×GeV/c, Nucl. Phys. A610, 404C (1996)

    1996

  54. [54]

    M. C. Abreuet al.(NA50), AnomalousJ/ψsuppression in Pb- Pb interactions at 158 GeV/c per nucleon, Phys. Lett. B410, 337 (1997)

    1997

  55. [55]

    M. C. Abreuet al.(NA50), Observation of a threshold effect in the anomalousJ/ψsuppression, Phys. Lett. B450, 456 (1999)

    1999

  56. [56]

    M. C. Abreuet al.(NA50), Evidence for deconfinement of quarks and gluons from theJ/ψsuppression pattern measured in Pb-Pb collisions at the CERN SPS, Phys. Lett. B477, 28 (2000)

    2000

  57. [57]

    Adareet al.(PHENIX),J/ψProduction vs Centrality, Transverse Momentum, and Rapidity in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys

    A. Adareet al.(PHENIX),J/ψProduction vs Centrality, Transverse Momentum, and Rapidity in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 232301 (2007), arXiv:nucl-ex/0611020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    Adareet al.(PHENIX),J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Au+Au collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys

    A. Adareet al.(PHENIX),J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Au+Au collisions at √sNN =200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C84, 054912 (2011), arXiv:1103.6269 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Suppression of Non-PromptJ/ψ, PromptJ/ψ, andΥ(1S) in PbPb Collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV, J

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Suppression of Non-PromptJ/ψ, PromptJ/ψ, andΥ(1S) in PbPb Collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV, J. High Energy Physics05, 063 (2012), arXiv:1201.5069 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Abelevet al.(ALICE),J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV, Phys

    B. Abelevet al.(ALICE),J/ψsuppression at forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 072301 (2012), arXiv:1202.1383 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    M. J. Leitchet al.(NuSea), Measurement ofJ/ψandψ ′ sup- pression inp-A collisions at 800 GeV/c, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3256 (2000), arXiv:nucl-ex/9909007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  62. [62]

    Scomparin (NA60),J/ψproduction inp-A collisions at 158-GeV and 400 GeV: Recent results from the NA60 ex- periment, Nucl

    E. Scomparin (NA60),J/ψproduction inp-A collisions at 158-GeV and 400 GeV: Recent results from the NA60 ex- periment, Nucl. Phys. A830, 239C (2009), arXiv:0907.3682 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE),J/ψproduction and nuclear ef- fects in p-Pb collisions at √S NN =5.02 TeV, J. High Energy Physics02, 073 (2014), arXiv:1308.6726 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    J. L. Albaceteet al., Predictions for √sNN =5 TeV, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E22, 1330007 (2013), arXiv:1301.3395 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    J. L. Albaceteet al., Predictions for Cold Nuclear Matter Ef- fects inp+Pb Collisions at √sNN =8.16 TeV, Nucl. Phys. A 972, 18 (2018), arXiv:1707.09973 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Andronicet al., Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions, Eur

    A. Andronicet al., Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 107 (2016), arXiv:1506.03981 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    Karsch, D

    F. Karsch, D. Kharzeev, and H. Satz, Sequential charmo- nium dissociation, Phys. Lett. B637, 75 (2006), arXiv:hep- ph/0512239

    arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    Hayashigaki, Mass modification ofDmeson at finite density in QCD sum rule, Phys

    A. Hayashigaki, Mass modification ofDmeson at finite density in QCD sum rule, Phys. Lett. B487, 96 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/0001051

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    Mishra, E

    A. Mishra, E. L. Bratkovskaya, J. Schaffner-Bielich, S. Schramm, and H. Stoecker, Mass modification ofDme- son in hot hadronic matter, Phys. Rev. C69, 015202 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0308082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  70. [70]

    Friman, S

    B. Friman, S. H. Lee, and T. Song,Dmesons in matter and the in-medium properties of charmonium, Phys. Lett. B548, 153 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0207006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  71. [71]

    Sibirtsev, K

    A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima, K. Saito, and A. W. Thomas, Novel features ofJ/ψdissociation in matter, Phys. Lett. B484, 23 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9904015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  72. [72]

    Y . S. Golubeva, E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, and L. A. Kondratyuk, In-medium spectral functions of charmonia stud- ied by ¯p+A reactions, Eur. Phys. J. A17, 275 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0212074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  73. [73]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. Mishra,Dmesons and charmonium states in asymmetric nuclear matter at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. C 81, 065204 (2010), arXiv:1005.5018 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. Mishra,D-mesons and charmonium states in hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter, Eur. Phys. J. A47, 164 (2011), arXiv:1102.4792 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    Klingl, S.-S

    F. Klingl, S.-S. Kim, S. H. Lee, P. Morath, and W. Weise,J/ψ andη c in the nuclear medium: QCD sum rule approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3396 (1999), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 83, 4224 (1999)], arXiv:nucl-th/9811070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  76. [76]

    Hayashigaki,J/ψnucleon scattering length and in-medium mass shift ofJ/ψin QCD sum rule analysis, Prog

    A. Hayashigaki,J/ψnucleon scattering length and in-medium mass shift ofJ/ψin QCD sum rule analysis, Prog. Theor. Phys.101, 923 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9811092

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  77. [77]

    Kim and S

    S.-s. Kim and S. H. Lee, QCD sum rules forJ/ψin the nuclear medium: Contributions from dimension-six operators, Nucl. Phys. A679, 517 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0002002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  78. [78]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. Mishra,J/ψandη c masses in isospin asym- metric hot nuclear matter: A QCD sum rule approach, Phys. Rev. C82, 045207 (2010), arXiv:1005.2748 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  79. [79]

    M. E. Luke, A. V . Manohar, and M. J. Savage, A QCD Calcu- 10 lation of the interaction of quarkonium with nuclei, Phys. Lett. B288, 355 (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9204219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  80. [80]

    S. H. Lee and C. M. Ko, Charmonium in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C67, 038202 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0208003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.