Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A simplified standard-model-plus-gravity theory can be made free of all obstructive anomalies only if a mirror right-handed sector shares the same metric and SU(2) gauge field; the author argues that sector may be dark matter.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 07:34 UTC pith:SN5LI2X3

load-bearing objection Plausible central anomaly claim, but the coefficients are imported from the earlier two-metric model rather than recomputed here; the new cosmology section also has a concrete algebra error. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.25217 v3 pith:SN5LI2X3 submitted 2025-10-29 hep-th

Anomaly footprints in SM+Gravity

Loriano Bonora This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 04.60.-m11.30.Rd95.35.+d
keywords anomaly cancellationmirror fermionsleft-right symmetrystandard model plus gravitydark matterWeyl invariancetrace anomalyWess-Zumino term
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the simplest version of the Standard Model coupled to gravity can be made free of all obstructive anomalies—the kind that make chiral fermion propagators impossible to define—by adding a mirror right-handed sector. The mirror sector has its own strong and hypercharge gauge fields but shares one metric and one SU(2) weak gauge field with the ordinary left-handed sector; only with that shared SU(2) do all anomalies cancel, including a residual odd-parity trace anomaly carried by the SU(2) field strength. If that holds, a right-handed mirror world is not an optional decoration but an anomaly footprint: nature's chiral one-handedness is the visible trace of a required cancellation. The paper develops two consequences: the mirror sector is a plausible dark-matter candidate, and a Weyl-invariant version of the model yields a new pre-inflationary cosmological regime plus a Wess-Zumino mechanism that may restore conformal symmetry and unitarity at one loop. A sympathetic reader would care because the same mechanism that makes the theory consistent also predicts a dark sector and reframes the cosmological constant problem.

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the theory's own terms, is that the action S = S_f + S_g + S_EH + S_d + S_Y, built from two chirally mirror fermion multiplets with separate SU(3) and U(1) gauge fields but a common metric and a common SU(2) gauge field, is free of all type-O anomalies. Both halves are separately anomaly-free except for four units of the odd-parity trace anomaly with density F*F built from the SU(2) curvature in the doublet representation. Because the two halves couple to one and the same SU(2) potential, those residual contributions have opposite signs and cancel when the left and right sectors are put together. The paper calls this action the likely minimal form of the anomaly-

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the left-right mirror pair of fermion multiplets: the ordinary MSM multiplet plus a sterile neutrino, and its mirror image with opposite chirality, with separate SU(3) and U(1) gauge groups on the two sides. What makes the cancellation work is that both multiplets couple to the same metric and to the same SU(2) gauge field: the mirror multiplet reproduces the anomaly coefficients of the left multiplet but with opposite sign for the SU(2)-dependent odd trace anomaly, so the sum vanishes. The supporting machinery is Weyl invariance, implemented by dilaton fields that transform as phi -> phi + omega, which lets the Einstein-Hilbert, scalar-mass, and cosmological-const

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the anomaly-coefficient calculation performed for the earlier two-metric model carries over unchanged to the simplified one-metric, one-SU(2)-coupling theory; the paper invokes that computation without redoing it.

What would settle it

Compute directly, in the one-metric theory with a single shared SU(2) connection, the full set of type-O anomaly polynomials for the combined left and right fermion multiplets: the SU(2)-odd trace anomaly with density F*F, the mixed gauge-gravitational anomalies involving the shared spin connection, and the pure gravitational odd-parity anomalies. If the total is not identically zero for arbitrary background gauge fields and metric, the central cancellation claim is false; this is a finite one-loop calculation that does not rely on the two-metric approximation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the action is truly type-O anomaly-free, perturbative quantization of SM plus gravity starts with well-defined propagators and vertices; the theory meets the first requirement of an effective field theory, even though renormalizability and unitarity remain open.
  • The mirror right-handed sector becomes a concrete dark-matter candidate: it interacts with ordinary matter only through gravity and the shared SU(2) gauge field, so it is invisible to strong and electromagnetic probes at low energy.
  • The Weyl-invariant extension admits a conformal-regime cosmological solution whose scale factor grows linearly with time and whose energy density scales as 1/a^4, distinct from radiation-, matter-, and de Sitter-dominated evolution; this could describe the very early universe before inflation.
  • Because the cosmological constant enters through a factor e^{-4phi}, choosing a sufficiently negative dilaton background lowers the effective cosmological constant by many orders of magnitude, reframing the cosmological-constant problem as a choice of Weyl gauge.
  • Wess-Zumino terms can restore one-loop conformal invariance and, by fixing the dilaton gauge to cancel the higher-derivative ghost pole, may preserve unitarity at one loop; higher-loop behavior is left open.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An inference beyond the paper: the one-metric simplification makes the anomaly argument more fragile than the two-metric version, because a single spin connection and a single SU(2) connection now couple both chiral sectors simultaneously; the mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly coefficients should be recomputed in the simplified theory rather than borrowed from the earlier model.
  • If the mirror sector is dark matter and shares the weak force, its constituents carry SU(2) charge; a high-energy collider or cosmic-ray search for weak gauge-boson exchange between the two sectors could distinguish this model from purely gravitational dark matter.
  • The paper's dilaton gauge-fixing idea suggests a general hierarchy mechanism: because conformal invariance lets one choose different dilaton backgrounds for different sectors, the same logic that suppresses the cosmological constant could in principle suppress the electroweak scale, though the paper does not develop this.
  • The one-loop ghost cancellation is a calculable prescription; repeating the quantization at two loops, or including the non-minimal couplings, would show whether the ghost-free condition survives beyond leading order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a simplified version of the model of [8]: a left-right mirror extension of the SM with a single metric and a single shared SU(2) gauge field, claiming cancellation of all obstructive (type-O) anomalies, interpreting the right sector as dark matter, and exploring Weyl invariance, a cosmological 'conformal regime', application to the cosmological constant, and one-loop unitarity via Wess-Zumino terms. The main advertised results are that the one-metric model is type-O anomaly-free and that the right sector is a viable dark-matter candidate; the remainder is a mix of review and speculative proposals.

Significance. If the anomaly-free claim were substantiated, the model would provide a concrete, falsifiable scenario in which the mirror sector interacts with the visible sector only through gravity and the common SU(2), and the 'why only left-handed particles' puzzle would be answered by anomaly cancellation. The paper is honest about many limitations and includes useful review material on Weyl anomalies and WZ terms. However, as it stands the central cancellation is asserted rather than computed, and the cosmological solution contains an algebraic inconsistency; these issues must be fixed before the claims can be evaluated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eq. (15)] The type-O anomaly-free statement is not derived in this paper. The text says that the anomaly analysis of the mirror multiplet is 'the same' as for the left multiplet 'except for the sign' and refers to [8], but footnote 5 records that [8] used two separate SU(2) couplings. In the present one-metric/common-SU(2) model the F*F trace-anomaly coefficients must be recomputed for a single spin connection and a single SU(2) connection; the ±4 units cannot be imported by assertion. This is load-bearing because Eq. (15) is presented as the 'minimal form of the anomaly-free action', and all later claims assume that propagators exist. Please provide the one-loop calculation, or a precise derivation of the coefficients for this simplified field content.
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (35)-(38)] Substituting the ansatz (36) into (35) makes the left-hand side identically zero: with Φ=α/t and φ=ln(βt), one has Φ̇+Φ φ̇=0, so all derivative terms in (35) cancel. Therefore Eq. (38), '2+α=...', does not follow. The actual condition from (35) is m²α/β² = λα³/2 (up to sign). Thus the 'conformal regime' solution (36,41,43) is not established by the displayed equations. Please correct the equations of motion or the ansatz and re-derive (37)-(38) consistently.
  3. [§4.2, Eqs. (45)-(46)] The proposed application to the cosmological constant problem is a tuned gauge choice, not a solution. The paper states that choosing a sufficiently negative value, e.g. φ≈-25, makes the effective cosmological constant comparable to the observed value. Since conformal invariance makes φ configurations equivalent, any such choice is a restatement of the tuning problem unless a mechanism selects φ₀. The ferromagnetic analogy in §5.3 is not such a mechanism. Please present this as an open problem rather than an 'application', or supply a dynamical selection mechanism.
  4. [§5.3, around Eq. (50)] The unitarity argument that a φ-gauge choice cancels the WZ term against the Weyl² counterterm and removes ghosts is not demonstrated. A WZ term added to restore the Weyl Ward identity is a local functional whose coefficient is fixed by the anomaly; choosing φ=const may cancel a particular coefficient in the effective action, but unitarity is a property of the physical S-matrix. The statement that if unitarity holds for one gauge it extends to all φ is assumed, not proven. Since the abstract advertises that negative-norm states 'may' be avoided, this claim needs a rigorous treatment or should be explicitly marked as conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Numerous typos and notation slips: 'G/f ields' in the table, 'bx' in integrals, 'woud', 'mistery', 'fotinos', 'workshop'. Please proofread carefully.
  2. [§2, Eqs. (3)-(8)] The spinor and charge-conjugation conventions are hard to follow. Please spell out how the multiplets in (1) and (2) are assembled from Weyl fermions and, in particular, how the common SU(2) coupling appears in both D⁽⁺⁾ and D⁽⁻⁾.
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (34)] Eq. (34) contains unclear notation such as '¨ΦΦ' and appears to have unbalanced parentheses. Please rewrite it in conventional form.
  4. [§5.1] The statement that the one-loop trace-anomaly computation reduces to free-field results 'for each species separately' needs qualification: at one loop, species mix through interaction vertices; the disentangling is non-trivial and should be explained.
  5. [References] Since the central anomaly cancellation is borrowed from [8], please give precise equation or section references in [8] for the ±4 F*F coefficients, rather than a blanket citation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Central anomaly-free claim is largely inherited from the author's [8] rather than recomputed for the simplified one-metric, one-SU(2) model; the cosmological-constant discussion tunes the dilaton gauge to the observed value rather than predicting it.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2, after Eq. (15), and footnote 5]
    "In [8] it was shown that all the anomalies cancel out except for 4 units of the trace anomaly with density F*F, due to the gauge field F≡Fsu(2), computed in the doublet representation of su(2). ... The anomaly analysis of this mirror multiplet is the same as for the left-handed one except for the sign of the trace anomaly due to the gauge field F≡Fsu(2), which is opposite. Therefore the overall sum of the anomalies of the system vanishes. ... In [8] two SU(2) gauge couplings were introduced, one for each sector; however the cancelation of SU(2) gauge-induced odd trace anomalies requires that t"

    The central assertion that T=TL∪TR is type-O anomaly-free is not recomputed for the simplified model with one metric and one shared SU(2) field; it is imported from [8] and only sign-flipped. Footnote 5 concedes that the one-coupling condition is required for the cancellation, i.e. it is imposed as an input. The mirror sector is therefore constructed so that its anomaly has the opposite sign, and the 'cancellation' is a verification of that construction, not an independently derived prediction. All later claims about propagators, unitarity, and cosmology rest on this inherited result.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.2, 'The problem of scales', and footnote 7]
    "The observed value is |rho^(obs)_Lambda| ~ 2×10^-10 erg/cm^3 ... if we choose a sufficiently negative value for phi, for instance a 'gauge' phi ≈ -25 or a similar one, the effective cosmological constant takes on a value for which the gravitational vacuum energy may be comparable with the value of the vacuum energy of the theory, whatever it may be. ... Due to the residual scale invariance we can always rescale t so that e^{phi0} c corresponds to the measured cosmological constant."

    The application to the cosmological constant problem consists in fixing the free dilaton 'gauge' to a value chosen after the observed vacuum energy density is known. Footnote 7 explicitly states that one can always rescale t so that the combination matches the measured cosmological constant. Thus the claimed flexibility does not derive the observed value from first principles; it tunes a free parameter to the target quantity and then presents the match as a virtue of the scheme.

full rationale

Most of the paper is not definitionally circular. The Weyl-invariant extension, the power-law background solution, and the Wess-Zumino construction are self-contained or standard, and the dark-matter discussion is explicitly an interpretative proposal rather than a derived prediction. However, the cornerstone claim that Eq. (15) is anomaly-free is taken from the author's prior paper [8] and adapted by a sign argument, while footnote 5 changes the setup from two SU(2) couplings to one; the cancellation is therefore a condition imposed on the model, not an output of a fresh one-loop calculation. Separately, the cosmological-constant discussion fixes the dilaton gauge to match the observed value, which is fitting, and the one-loop ghost-avoidance similarly selects a gauge by hand. These are genuine fitted/self-cited dependencies, but they do not collapse the whole derivation into a tautology, so a moderate score is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper's new content rests on imported anomaly coefficients from [8], a standard Weyl/dilaton recipe, and hand-chosen ansatz and gauge parameters (alpha, beta, gamma; phi ~ -25; epsilon). There are no machine-checked proofs, no code, and no external falsifiable predictions beyond the general mirror-dark-matter idea.

free parameters (3)
  • dilaton gauge phi ~ -25 = -25 (order of magnitude)
    Chosen in Sec. 4.2 so the effective cosmological constant e^{-4phi} c/(2kappa) becomes comparable to the observed rho_Lambda ~ 2e-10 erg/cm^3; this is fitting the target value.
  • ansatz coefficients alpha, beta, gamma = constrained by eqs. (37)-(38), not solved explicitly
    Introduced in eq. (36) to build the conformal background; the paper determines them from consistency equations that are not internally consistent as written.
  • two-dilaton mixing parameter epsilon = unspecified real number
    Introduced in eq. (48) to interpolate between two Weyl frames; chosen by hand to prepare a 'reasonable form for quantization' at intermediate scales.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The Atiyah-Singer family index theorem classifies O-type anomalies as obstructions to chiral-fermion propagators, and the anomaly coefficients used for the MSM plus gravity in [8] are correct.
    Secs. 1 and 2 rely on this to assert that multiplet (1) leaves only 4 units of F*F trace anomaly and that multiplet (2) cancels it.
  • domain assumption The trace-anomaly coefficients for each species are as quoted and are not modified by the single-metric, shared-SU(2) simplification.
    The paper does not recompute them; it transfers them from [8].
  • standard math Weyl invariance can be imposed by replacing R with tilded R, multiplying dimensionful constants by e^{-s phi}, and substituting D_mu = partial_mu + partial_mu phi.
    Sec. 4, eqs. (17)-(24), uses this standard conformalization recipe.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz Phi = alpha/t, phi = ln(beta t), a = gamma t satisfies the equations of motion (34)-(35) for some alpha, beta, gamma.
    This is the load-bearing ansatz for the conformal regime; as written, substitution into (35) gives a vanishing left-hand side, so the premise is not verified.
  • standard math Consistent Weyl anomalies satisfy the Wess-Zumino consistency condition, and WZ terms with sigma identified with -phi restore Weyl invariance and can cancel ghost counterterms.
    Sec. 5.2-5.3, eqs. (64)-(70), uses the standard WZ construction.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-dilaton combination S_mu = epsilon partial_mu phi_1 + (1-epsilon) partial_mu phi_2 with arbitrary real epsilon defines a Weyl-invariant extension for intermediate scales.
    Sec. 4.2, eqs. (47)-(49); epsilon is a hand-chosen parameter.
invented entities (2)
  • mirror right sector T_R (mirror fermions, scalars, SU(3)_R and U(1)_R gauge fields) no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancels the residual odd-parity SU(2) trace anomaly and provides a dark-matter candidate.
    No mass spectrum, relic density, or detection predictions are given; mirror dark matter exists in the literature, but this specific realization has no falsifiable handle in this paper.
  • dilaton fields phi_+/- (and the two-dilaton variant phi_1, phi_2) no independent evidence
    purpose: Restore Weyl invariance and support the cosmological-constant gauge argument.
    Dilatons are standard, but here no dynamical origin or observational signature is specified; the phi ~ -25 choice is tuned to the observed cosmological constant.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20668 in / 22192 out tokens · 208132 ms · 2026-08-04T07:34:21.172609+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This is a follow-up of arXiv:2412.07470 [hep-th]. A simplified version of the SM plus gravity, put forward there, is presented here and some of its aspects delved into. The basic structure consists of two sectors, left and right, with chirally mirror fermions and scalars, as well as $SU(3)$ and $U(1)$ gauge fields, while the $SU(2)$ gauge fields as well as the metric are in common to both sectors. This structure is dictated by the request to cancel all dangerous anomalies. The left sector consists of the fermion, gauge and scalar fields of the SM, now minimally coupled to gravity. The right sector is a mirror image of the left, with distinct fields, except the metric and the $SU(2)$ gauge potentials. The first new aspect is the proposed and motivated interpretation of the right sector as the dark matter one. The second new subject covered here is Weyl symmetry and its possible application to cosmology and its theoretical fallout on unitarity and renormalization of the model. A background solution of the Weyl invariant theory is derived, which may apply to the very early stages of the universe. This solution also suggests interesting applications to the cosmological constant problem. On the quantum field theory side the subject of Weyl symmetry and Weyl anomalies is reviewed and, among other things, an application of the WZ terms is illustrated to the problem of one-loop quantization of the model which may avoid negative norm states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.25217 by Loriano Bonora.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A scattering between left and right fermions mediated by SU(2) gauge bosons or gravitons (dashed line). For the right-handed fermions and scalars we have of course a mirror description. If we imagine that this is the theory at the basis of the evolution of the universe after what is called the grand￾unification era, 10−35sec after the beginning, there is certainly something missing, at least one or more fi… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Conformal symmetry, SM and Gravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A Weyl-invariant SM+mirror-dark-matter+gravity model is developed via algebraic renormalization; its conformal cohomology is claimed trivial, and the required counterterms could — the author concedes not conclusively ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi,Dark matter and the early Universe: a review, ArXiv:2104.11488v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Chiara Arina,Review of Dark Matter tools, PoS,TOOLS2020, arXiv:2012.0962v2[hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Y.Bai and P.Schwaller,Scale of dark QCD, Phys.Rev.D89(2014) 063522-1

    2014

  4. [4]

    Bambi and A

    C. Bambi and A. D. Dolgov,Introduction to Particle Cosmology, Springer Verlag GmbH, Berlin Heidelberg 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    Bergstr¨ om,Non-Baryonic Dark Matter: Observational Evidence and Detection Methods, Rept.Prog.Phys.63:793,2000, arXiv:hep-ph/0002126v1

    L. Bergstr¨ om,Non-Baryonic Dark Matter: Observational Evidence and Detection Methods, Rept.Prog.Phys.63:793,2000, arXiv:hep-ph/0002126v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hopper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter:evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rep.405(2005), 279

    2005

  7. [7]

    Bonora,Fermions and Anomalies in Quantum Field Theories, Springer 2023

    L. Bonora,Fermions and Anomalies in Quantum Field Theories, Springer 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Bonora and S

    L. Bonora and S. Giaccari,Something Anomalies can tell about SM and Gravity, arXiv:2412.07470 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    S. M. Boucenna and S. Morisi,Theories relating baryon asymmetry and dark matter. Mini review, Front. Physics 1:33, arXiv:1310.1904v3 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    R. H. Brandenberger,Lectures on the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations,Lect. Notes Phys. 646(2004) 127-167, arXiv:hep-th/0306071v1. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  11. [11]

    C. P. Burgess,Dark Energy and the Symbiosis between Micro-physics and Cosmology (Naturally), arXiv:2509.00688v1[hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    S. M. Carrol,The cosmological constant, http://www.livingreviewes.org/Articles/index.html

  13. [13]

    Codello, G

    A. Codello, G. D’Odorico, C. Pagani, R. Percacci,The Renormalization Group and Weyl- invariance, Class.Quant.Grav. 30 (2013) 115015, e-Print: 1210.3284 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Drees and G

    M. Drees and G. Gerbier,Mini-Review of Dark Matter: 2012, arXiv:1204.2373v1 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    M.J.Duff,Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly, Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387 [hep- th,9308075]

    1994

  16. [16]

    M.J.Duff,Weyl, Pontryagin, Euler, Eguchi and Freund, Jour. Phys. A: Mathematical and The- oretical,53(2020) 301001 [arXiv:2006.03574]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    L. H. Ford and L. Parker,Quantized gravitational wave perturbations In Robertson-Walker uni- verses, Phys.Rev.D16(1977) 1601

    1977

  18. [18]

    L. H. Ford,Cosmological Particle Production: A Review, Rep. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 116901, arXiv:2112.02444v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Gell-Mann, R

    M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakex and B. Renner,Behavior of current divergences underSU(3)×SU(3). Phys. Rev.175(1968) 2195

    1968

  20. [20]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Standard model in Weyl conformal geometry,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 23, arXiv:2104.15118 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Non-metric geometry as the origin of mass in gauge theories of scale invariance, Eur. Phys. J.C 83(2023) 176, [arXiv:2203.05381 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    D. M. Ghilencea,Quantum gravity from Weyl conformal geometry,, arXiv:2408.07160v1 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky,Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation, Phys.Rev.D56(1997) 6175

    1997

  24. [24]

    Julve and M

    J. Julve and M. Tonin,Quamtum Gravity with Higher Derivative Terms, Il Nuovo Cimento,46 (1978) 137

    1978

  25. [25]

    H. M. Hodges,Mirror baryons as the dark matter, Phys.Rev.D47(1993) 456

    1993

  26. [26]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the Present Status of Inflationary Cosmology, arXiv:2505.13646v1[hep-th], Lemaˆitre Conference 2004

    arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, |it Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev.D56(1995) 3258

    1995

  28. [28]

    Kugo and I

    T. Kugo and I. Ojima,Manifestly Covariant Canonical Formulation of the Yang-Mills Field The- ories. I, Prog. Theor. Phys.60(1978) 1869

    1978

  29. [29]

    Mohammedi,A note on Weyl gauge symmetry in gravity, arXiv:2402.04712 [hep-th]

    N. Mohammedi,A note on Weyl gauge symmetry in gravity, arXiv:2402.04712 [hep-th]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    R. N. Mohapatra and V. I. Teplitz,STRUCTURES IN THE MIRROR UNIVERSE, The As- trophisical Journal478(1997) 29

    1997

  31. [31]

    Rep.215(19992) 203-233

    , V.F.Mukhanov, H.A.FeldmanandR.H.Brandenberger,Theory of Cosmological Perturbations, Phys. Rep.215(19992) 203-233

  32. [32]

    Oda,Quantum scale invariant gravity with DeDonder gauge, Phys

    I. Oda,Quantum scale invariant gravity with DeDonder gauge, Phys. Rev.D 105(2022) 066001

    2022

  33. [33]

    Oda,Quantum Theory of Weyl-invariant Scalar-tensor Gravity, Phys

    I. Oda,Quantum Theory of Weyl-invariant Scalar-tensor Gravity, Phys. Rev.D 105(2022) 120618. http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11200v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Oda and P

    I. Oda and P. Saake,BRST Formalism of Weyl Conformal Gravity, Phys. Rev.D 106(2022) 106007. http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14533v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Oda and M

    I. Oda and M. Ohta,Quantum Conformal Gravity, JHEP02(2024) 213. http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09582v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Oda,Conformal Symmetry in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2403.04056v1 [hep-th]

    I. Oda,Conformal Symmetry in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:2403.04056v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Oda,BRST Formalism of f (R) Gravity, ArXiv:2410.20270 [hep-th]

    I. Oda,BRST Formalism of f (R) Gravity, ArXiv:2410.20270 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    I, Phys.Rev.183(1969) 1057

    L.Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. I, Phys.Rev.183(1969) 1057

    1969

  39. [39]

    II,Phys.Rev.D3(1971) 346

    L.Parker,Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. II,Phys.Rev.D3(1971) 346

    1971

  40. [40]

    Parker and D

    L. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum fields in curved space, Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  41. [41]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An introduction to quantum field theory, Westview Press 1995

    1995

  42. [42]

    Piguet and S

    O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella,Algebraic Renormalization, Springer 1995

    1995

  43. [43]

    Pottel and K

    S. Pottel and K. Sibold.Perturbative quantization of Einstein-Hilbert gravity embedded in a higher derivative model.Physical ReviewD 104(2021) 086012. arXiv:2012.11450v3 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Pottel and K

    S. Pottel and K. Sibold.Perturbative quantization of Einstein-Hilbert gravity embedded in a higher derivative model. II, arXiv:2308.15824v2 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Rachwal,Introduction to Quantization of Conformal Gravity, arXiv:2204.13856 [hep-th]

    L. Rachwal,Introduction to Quantization of Conformal Gravity, arXiv:2204.13856 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Racker,Mini-review on baryogenesis at the TeV scale and possible connection with dark matter, Contribution to the proceedings of ICHEP 2014, arXiv:410.5482v1 [hep-ph]

    J. Racker,Mini-review on baryogenesis at the TeV scale and possible connection with dark matter, Contribution to the proceedings of ICHEP 2014, arXiv:410.5482v1 [hep-ph]

    2014

  47. [47]

    D.Roumelioti, S.Stefas, G.Zoupanos,Unification of Conformal Gravity and Internal Interactions, http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17511v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Scholz,The Unexpected Resurgence of Weyl Geometry in late 20th-Century Physics,Einstein Stud.14(2018) 261-360, arXiv:1703.03187 [math.HO]

    E. Scholz,The Unexpected Resurgence of Weyl Geometry in late 20th-Century Physics,Einstein Stud.14(2018) 261-360, arXiv:1703.03187 [math.HO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zhakarov,QCD and resonance physics, sum rules, Nucl. Phys.B 147(1979) 385. 25

    1979

  50. [50]

    Shtanov, J

    Y. Shtanov, J. Traschen and R. Brandenberger,Universe reheating after inflation, Phys.Rev.D51 (1995) 5438

    1995

  51. [51]

    Sibold.Einstein-Hilbert Gravity, Higher Derivatives And a Scalar Matter Field, arXiv:2405.00528v1 [hep-th]

    K. Sibold.Einstein-Hilbert Gravity, Higher Derivatives And a Scalar Matter Field, arXiv:2405.00528v1 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    K. S. Stelle,Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity. Phys. Rev.D 16(1977) 953

    1977

  53. [53]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenbergere,Particie production during out-of-equilibrium phase transitions, Phys.Rev.D422491

  54. [54]

    Modern Cosmology

    S. Tsuchikawa,Introductory Review of Cosmic Inflation, lecture notes given at The Second Tah Poe School on Cosmology "Modern Cosmology", Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, April 17 -25, 2003, arXiv:hep-ph/0304257v1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    J. A. Vasquez, L. E. Padilla and T. Matos,Inflationary Cosmology: From Theory to Observations, Rev. Mex. Fis.E17(2020) 1, arXiv:1810.09934v3 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Vilenkin,Cosmological constant problems and their solutions, arXiv:hep-th/0106083

    A. Vilenkin,Cosmological constant problems and their solutions, arXiv:hep-th/0106083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, Rev.Mod

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, Rev.Mod. Phys.61(1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, arXiv:astro-phys/0005265

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem, arXiv:astro-phys/0005265. 26

    arXiv