Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Near an ion-atom Feshbach resonance, the long-range 1/r^4 polarization potential puts ionic three-body systems in a distinct universality class: three-body recombination is suppressed ~250-fold and the Efimov ground-state lifetime can reach

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:33 UTC pith:I5JH7SGL

load-bearing objection Solid new numerical result on 1/r^4 ionic three-body universality, but the real-system quantitative claims (250x suppression, 100 ms lifetimes) rest on a spinless single-channel model and should be framed more carefully. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.00325 v3 pith:I5JH7SGL submitted 2025-11-01 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Universality in Ionic Three-body Systems Near an Ion-atom Feshbach Resonance

Jacek G\c{e}bala , Micha{\l} Tomza , Jos\'e P. D'Incao This is my paper
classification physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords ionic three-body systemsatom-ion Feshbach resonanceEfimov physicsuniversality classesthree-body recombinationpolarization potentialLiLiBa+long-range interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that three-body systems made of two neutral atoms and one ion obey a different universality class than their all-neutral counterparts. Using a single-channel pairwise model for 7Li₂ + 138Ba⁺ near an atom-ion Feshbach resonance, it finds the 1/r^4 polarization interaction slows inelastic transitions: the three-body recombination rate is about 250 times smaller than the standard zero-range prediction for the analogous LiLiBa system. Consequently the ground Efimov trimer survives up to ~100 ms, roughly five orders of magnitude longer than in the neutral case. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests ultracold atom-ion mixtures may be a practical setting to observe Efimov states and long-lived triatomic molecular ions that are hard to see with neutral atoms.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the long-range atom-ion interaction (v∝−C4/r^4) defines a universality class in which the standard universal formulas for three-body recombination—derived from contact or van der Waals (1/r^6) interactions—no longer hold. For the LiLiBa⁺ system the numerically converged L3 amplitude cannot be fitted by the usual universal expressions with a₊, a₋, and η; instead it is universal within the 1/r^4 class but suppressed by ~250 relative to the neutral counterpart. The ground Efimov state remains bound for a_BX values far below the enormous geometric scale e^{π/s₀}≈2×10³⁸, and its lifetime, τ=ħ/Γ, extends to ~100 ms because the more slowly var

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the adiabatic hyperspherical representation, which reduces the three-body problem to hyperradial motion on effective potentials Uν(R) coupled by non-adiabatic terms Wνν′. For the ion-atom pair the paper uses a regularized polarization potential v_BX(r)=-(C4/r^4)(1-λ^4/r^4), with C4 and λ tuned to span a Feshbach resonance; the neutral counterpart uses Lennard-Jones 1/r^6 potentials. The key mechanism is that the ionic potentials vary more slowly as R approaches short distance, so the Wνν′ couplings are numerically smaller, suppressing inelastic decay and explaining both the ~250× smaller L3 and the much longer Efimov lifetime.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume a single, spinless, pairwise-additive interaction with no internal spin structure; real 138Ba⁺ + 7Li collisions include spin-orbit and additional inelastic channels, and if those add decay routes, the predicted 250-fold suppression and 100 ms lifetime would not survive.

What would settle it

Measure the three-body loss rate in an ultracold 7Li + 138Ba⁺ mixture near a predicted ion-atom Feshbach resonance and compare L3 with the LiLiBa neutral rate at the same |a_BX|. An observed suppression far below the predicted ~250, or an Efimov resonance with lifetime far shorter than ~100 ms, would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Ionic Efimov states are predicted to be long-lived enough (~100 ms) to be experimentally resolvable in ultracold Ba⁺–Li mixtures, whereas neutral Efimov states of similar mass ratio are too short-lived to observe.
  • Three-body losses in ultracold ion-atom gases should be far weaker than expected from the universal neutral theory, improving sample lifetimes for quantum simulation and chemistry experiments.
  • The spectral density of triatomic molecular ions is much higher than for neutral triatomics, with selected resonances showing narrow widths and microsecond lifetimes, making them candidates for state-resolved studies.
  • The same 1/E_b product-state propensity rule seen in neutral homonuclear recombination also governs Li₂⁺Ba⁺ vs LiBa⁺⁺Li product channels, so state-to-state control techniques should transfer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the single-channel, spinless interaction model probably overestimates the suppression; the real 138Ba⁺ + 7Li system has strong spin-orbit coupling and magnetic Feshbach resonances, so hyperfine-changing and charge-transfer channels could shorten the 100 ms lifetimes and reduce the 250-fold factor.
  • My inference: the universal 1/r^4 class should also apply to other heavy-ion/light-atom combinations, so the same suppression mechanism could be searched for in systems like Rb⁺ + Li or Yb⁺ + Li mixtures.
  • My inference: because the predicted Efimov trimer extends far beyond the ion-atom characteristic length, in a dense Bose-Einstein condensate it could overlap multiple atoms and act as a seed for polaronic or impurity-induced clustering, connecting the few-body result to many-body physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper investigates three-body bound and scattering properties of a system of two identical 7Li bosons and a 138Ba+ ion near an atom-ion Feshbach resonance, using the adiabatic hyperspherical close-coupling method with model pairwise potentials. The central claims are that, compared with the neutral LiLiBa system, the ionic LiLiBa+ system exhibits a three-body recombination rate L3 suppressed by a factor of about 250 relative to the universal predictions of Helfrich-Hammer-Petrov [45], and that the ground Efimov state has a lifetime up to about 100 ms, roughly five orders of magnitude longer than its neutral counterpart. The authors attribute this suppression to reduced non-adiabatic couplings caused by the long-range 1/r^4 polarization interaction, and further characterize the dense spectrum of weakly bound triatomic molecular ions. They also present an effective-range analysis for ion-atom scattering and fit universal-theory parameters for the neutral system.

Significance. If correct, the paper identifies a distinct universality class for three-body systems with 1/r^4 interactions, with potentially important consequences for ultracold ion-atom experiments: suppressed inelastic losses and long-lived Efimov states would make ionic systems a promising platform for exploring long-range few-body physics. The work uses a well-established numerical method, reports convergence at the 1-2% level, and benchmarks the neutral LiLiBa calculation against the universal theory of Ref. [45]. The effective-range analysis for the ion-atom interaction is a useful contribution in its own right. However, the quantitative predictions for the specific 7Li2 138Ba+ system depend on a single-channel, spinless interaction model, and the central suppression factor is not derived from a well-defined fit for the ionic case. These issues materially affect the strength of the claims as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and End Matter, Eqs. (10)-(14)] The central claim of a ~250-fold suppression is not rigorously quantified. The text states that for LiLiBa+ 'we could not identify any reasonable set of parameters within the framework of the universal theory [45] that reproduces the recombination amplitude shown in Fig. 2,' yet immediately claims a suppression 'by a factor of about 250 compared to the corresponding universal predictions of Ref. [45].' If the universal theory cannot reproduce the ionic amplitude, the reference prediction is undefined. The fits in the End Matter are performed for the neutral LiLiBa system and use the maximum-amplitude approximation (sin^2=1, cos^2=0), so they describe an upper envelope, not the actual L3 with interference. Please specify exactly how the factor 250 is extracted, present the numerical results obtained with different Li-Ba+ interaction models, and define the reference prediction used for the
  2. [Interaction model, Section 2 and Fig. 2(c)] The quantitative predictions for 7Li2 138Ba+—the factor-250 suppression and the ~100 ms Efimov lifetime—rest entirely on a single-channel, spinless, pairwise-additive interaction model with v_BX = -C4/r^4 (1 - lambda_X^4/r^4). The authors' own Ref. [19] demonstrates that real Ba+ + Li collisions are governed by strong spin-orbit coupling and magnetic Feshbach resonances. The model omits spin relaxation, hyperfine-changing, and other possible inelastic channels, which could shorten the predicted lifetimes and reduce the suppression. This is not an internal inconsistency of the calculation, but it means that the abstract's general claim that 'ionic systems display an overall suppression of inelastic transitions' is not established for the real physical system. Please either include a quantitative estimate of multichannel decay pathways or explicitly restrict the universality claims to the
  3. [Fig. 2 and following paragraph] The proposed mechanism for the suppression—weaker non-adiabatic couplings W_nu nu' in Eq. (1) for the ionic system—is asserted ('We have verified this reduction of non-adiabatic couplings numerically') but no quantitative evidence is shown. Since this mechanism is the physical explanation for the central result, please provide a plot or numerical comparison of W_nu nu' for LiLiBa and LiLiBa+. Similarly, the claim that the ionic results are universal based on different interaction models is not documented; please show the corresponding L3 curves and state how the number of bound states was varied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Minor grammar: 'and establishing them' should be 'and establish them'; also the final sentence is a run-on.
  2. [Eq. (1) and throughout] The mathematical notation in Eq. (1) and several other places is garbled in the manuscript (e.g., '/brack⟩tl⟩ft.alt4−', '/summation.disp', '/slash.l⟩ft'). These should be cleaned before publication.
  3. [End Matter, aBX < 0] The estimate a- ≈ -200 rvdW is described as 'very rough.' Since this parameter is used for the neutral-system comparison, it would be helpful to give an uncertainty estimate or show the sensitivity of the fitted eta to this value.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The statement 'for a total of ~40 states' for the neutral system is not obviously consistent with 'two s-wave states' for each pair; please clarify the counting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the ~250-fold L3 suppression and ~100 ms Efimov lifetimes are computed outputs of the stated hyperradial Schrödinger equation, benchmarked against the external universal theory of Ref. [45]; fitted η and a− are disclosed as fits and not used to construct the ionic predictions.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims are produced by direct numerical solution of the hyperradial Schrödinger equation (Eq. 1) with explicitly stated pairwise potentials (v_BB = -C6/r^6(1-λ_B^6/r^6); v_BX = -C4/r^4(1-λ_X^4/r^4) for Li-Ba+), with λ adjusted to stated two-body properties. The recombination rate follows from the S-matrix via Eq. (2), and the Efimov-state energy/width come from time-delay calculations (Fig. 2(c), Fig. 3). The ~250-fold suppression and up-to-100 ms lifetimes are outputs of these calculations, not inputs; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The fitted quantities (η ≈ 0.027 and 0.17, a− ≈ -200 r_vdW) are extracted by comparing neutral LiLiBa results to the universal theory of the external Ref. [45] and are explicitly disclosed as fits ('limiting-case approximation rather than a general prediction'; 'very rough estimate'). For the ionic system no fit to Ref. [45] is possible ('we could not identify any reasonable set of parameters a+, a−, and η... that reproduces the recombination amplitude'), so the 'suppressed by a factor of about 250 compared to the corresponding universal predictions of Ref. [45]' is a comparison of the numerical L3 to the external benchmark amplitude A(L3) — a benchmark choice, not a construction of the ionic result. The 'different universality classes' premise is cited to external work (Ref. [47], Naidon–Endo–Ueda), and the 1/E_b propensity-rule check repeats an established external scaling. Self-citations ([32], [49] for the numerical hyperspherical method; [46], [55], [58], [69] for related few-body results; [19] for Ba+ + Li Feshbach resonances) are methodological or contextual and are not load-bearing for the suppression claim. The single-channel spinless model limitation, including the paper's own Ref. [19] on strong spin-orbit coupling in real Ba+ + Li, is a correctness risk for the real-7Li2Ba+ interpretation, not an internal circularity. No equation is defined in terms of a claimed output, and no prediction reduces by construction to a fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a single-channel pairwise model with two tunable regularization parameters (λ_B, λ_X) and two universal-theory fit parameters (η, a-) used for the neutral benchmark. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumption is that the single-channel model captures the real Li-Ba+ interaction; spin-orbit and hyperfine channels present in 138Ba+ + 7Li (Ref [19]) are omitted.

free parameters (6)
  • λ_B (Li-Li potential regularization) = ~19.58 a0
    Adjusted so the Li-Li model supports two s-wave bound states and reproduces the 7Li background scattering length -27.3 a0 (Refs [52-54]); a model input, not a target of the central claim.
  • λ_X (Li-Ba+ potential regularization) = varied to realize each a_BX
    Adjusted for each interspecies scattering length a_BX to simulate tuning near a Feshbach resonance; a control parameter of the model.
  • Number of Li-Ba+ s-wave bound states = 6
    Baseline model supports 6 s-wave Li-Ba+ bound states (vs 2 for Li-Ba); the paper tests other values to argue universality, so the exact count is a modeling choice.
  • η (inelasticity, a_BX > 0) = ~0.027
    Fitted to the amplitude of the numerically computed L3 for the neutral LiLiBa system using Eq. (12) (End Matter).
  • η (inelasticity, a_BX < 0) = ~0.17
    Fitted to the LiLiBa L3 amplitude for a_BX < 0 using Eq. (14) (End Matter).
  • a- (Efimov resonance position) = ≈ -200 r_vdW
    Rough estimate from limited numerical L3 data for LiLiBa at a_BX < 0; authors explicitly call it 'very rough'.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Adiabatic hyperspherical representation: the hyperradial Schrödinger equation (Eq. 1) with coupled channels gives the exact solution of the three-body Schrödinger equation for pairwise potentials.
    Established method (Refs [32,48,49]); assumed valid for this system.
  • domain assumption The three-body interaction is a pairwise sum of two-body potentials; three-body forces are neglected.
    Stated in 'we assume the interactions ... to be a pairwise sum'; standard but not exact for real atoms/ions.
  • ad hoc to paper Li-Li and Li-Ba/Ba+ interactions are represented by Lennard-Jones and regularized polarization potentials: v_BB = -C6/r^6(1-λ_B^6/r^6), v_BX = -C6/r^6(1-λ_X^6/r^6) or -C4/r^4(1-λ_X^4/r^4).
    These functional forms are chosen to reproduce scattering lengths and bound-state counts; not ab initio molecular potentials.
  • domain assumption At E/k_B = 0.01 μK, only total angular momentum J=0 contributes; higher partial waves are suppressed.
    Wigner threshold-law result (Refs [57,58]) used for all scattering calculations.
  • domain assumption The universal theory of Ref [45] (heteronuclear contact-interaction EFT) correctly describes the neutral LiLiBa system and provides the benchmark amplitude A(L3).
    Used to extract η and a- for LiLiBa and to define the 250-fold suppression for LiLiBa+; if this benchmark is wrong, the suppression factor loses meaning.
  • standard math A three-boson ground-state binding energy cannot exceed three times the two-body ground-state binding energy (variational principle of Ref [67]).
    Used to explain why the Efimov ground state remains bound for a_BX << e^{π/s0}.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16926 in / 18574 out tokens · 177562 ms · 2026-08-04T00:33:39.582762+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We calculate bound and scattering properties of a system of two neutral atoms and an ion near an atom-ion Feshbach resonance. Our results indicate that long-range atom-ion interactions lead to significant deviations from universal behavior derived from contact or van der Waals potentials. We find that ionic systems display an overall suppression of inelastic transitions leading to recombination rates and lifetimes of Efimov state orders of magnitude smaller with respect to those for neutral atoms. We further characterize the dense spectra of triatomic molecular ions with extended lifetimes. Our results provide a deeper insight on the universality and structure of three-body ionic systems and establishing them as a promising platform for exploring novel few- and many-body phenomena with long-range interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00325 by Jacek G\c{e}bala, Jos\'e P. D'Incao, Micha{\l} Tomza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The three-body hyperspherical potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a), (b): Three-body recombination rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The time delay for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The (generalized) effective ranges for the ion-atom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum statistics on atom-ion Feshbach resonances

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Experimental observation of nonlinear dependence of ion loss rate on spin polarization in Ba+ immersed in two-component Li Fermi gas, consistent with antisymmetrization restricting recombination channels.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Both Uν and Wνν ′ are determined via the solutions of the hyperangular Hamiltonian, containing all the interato mic interactions [32, 48, 49]

    describes the hyperradial motion governed by the three-body adiabatic potentialsUν supporting bound and resonant states and non-adiabatic couplings Wνν ′ driving the inelastic transitions between the different ch an- nels. Both Uν and Wνν ′ are determined via the solutions of the hyperangular Hamiltonian, containing all the interato mic interactions [32, ...

    2020

  2. [2]

    M. Deiß, S. Willitsch, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Cold trap ped molecular ions and hybrid platforms for ions and neutral par ti- cles, Nat. Phys 20, 713 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    (11) Naturally, the formula for total recombination rate is ther efore given by A(L3) =A(Lw 3 ) +A(Ld 3)

    = 2C(δ)D coth(πs0) cosh(η) sinh(η) sinh2(πs0 +η) ̵ha4 BX mX . (11) Naturally, the formula for total recombination rate is ther efore given by A(L3) =A(Lw 3 ) +A(Ld 3). (12) We fit the model presented in Eq. (

  4. [4]

    Tomza, K

    M. Tomza, K. Jachymski, R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, T. Cal arco, Z. Idziaszek, and P . S. Julienne, Cold hybrid ion-atom syste ms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035001 (2019)

    2019

  5. [6]

    Bissbort, D

    U. Bissbort, D. Cocks, A. Negretti, Z. Idziaszek, T. Cala rco, F. Schmidt-Kaler, W. Hofstetter, and R. Gerritsma, Emulati ng solid-state physics with a hybrid system of ultracold ions a nd atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080501 (2013)

    2013

  6. [7]

    Jachymski and A

    K. Jachymski and A. Negretti, Quantum simulation of ex- tended polaron models using compound atom-ion systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033326 (2020)

    2020

  7. [8]

    Sikorsky, Z

    T. Sikorsky, Z. Meir, R. Ben-Shlomi, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri, Spin-controlled atom–ion chemistry, Nat. Commun. 9, 920 (2018)

    2018

  8. [9]

    Ratschbacher, C

    L. Ratschbacher, C. Sias, L. Carcagni, J. M. Silver, C. Zipkes, and M. K¨ ohl, Decoherence of a single- ion qubit immersed in a spin-polarized atomic bath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 160402 (2013)

    2013

  9. [10]

    Ratschbacher, C

    L. Ratschbacher, C. Zipkes, C. Sias, and M. K¨ ohl, Controlling chemical reactions of a single particle, Nat. Phys. 8, 649 (2012)

    2012

  10. [12]

    Three-body recombination for aBX < 0 For aBX < 0, shallow, Feshbach dimers are absent

    to our numerical results and estimate the value η ≈ 0.027. Three-body recombination for aBX < 0 For aBX < 0, shallow, Feshbach dimers are absent. The atoms can only recombine into deep dimers. Following Ref. [ 45] the rate constant for the recombination into deep dimers is given by Ld 3 =C(δ) D coth(πs0) sinh(2η) sinh2(η) + sin2[s0 ln(aBX /slash.left a−)]...

  11. [13]

    A. D. D¨ orfler, P . Eberle, D. Koner, M. Tomza, M. Meuwly, and S. Willitsch, Long-range versus short- range effects in cold molecular ion-neutral collisions, Nat. Commun. 10, 5429 (2019)

    2019

  12. [14]

    Hirzler, R

    H. Hirzler, R. S. Lous, E. Trimby, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, A. Sa favi- Naini, and R. Gerritsma, Observation of chemical reac- tions between a trapped ion and ultracold Feshbach dimers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 103401 (2022)

    2022

  13. [15]

    H¨ arter, A

    A. H¨ arter, A. Kr¨ ukow, A. Brunner, W. Schnitzler, S. Schmid, and J. H. Denschlag, Single ion as a three-body reaction center in an ultracold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 123201 (2012)

    2012

  14. [16]

    J. M. Schurer, A. Negretti, and P . Schmelcher, Unraveli ng the structure of ultracold mesoscopic collinear molecular ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 063001 (2017)

    2017

  15. [17]

    K. S. Kleinbach, F. Engel, T. Dieterle, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Ionic impurity in a Bose- Einstein condensate at submicrokelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 193401 (2018)

    2018

  16. [18]

    Feldker, H

    T. Feldker, H. F¨ urst, H. Hirzler, N. Ewald, M. Mazzanti , D. Wiater, M. Tomza, and R. Gerritsma, Buffer gas cooling of a trapped ion to the quantum regime, Nat. Phys. 16, 413 (2020)

    2020

  17. [19]

    Weckesser, F

    P . Weckesser, F. Thielemann, D. Wiater, A. Wojciechows ka, L. Karpa, K. Jachymski, M. Tomza, T. Walker, and T. Schaetz, Observation of Feshbach resonances between a single ion and ultracold atoms, Nature 600, 429 (2021)

    2021

  18. [20]

    Cetina, A

    M. Cetina, A. T. Grier, and V . Vuleti´ c, Micromotion- induced limit to atom-ion sympathetic cooling in paul traps , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 253201 (2012)

    2012

  19. [21]

    Thielemann, J

    F. Thielemann, J. Siemund, D. von Schoenfeld, W. Wu, P . Weckesser, K. Jachymski, T. Walker, and T. Schaetz, Ex- ploring atom-ion Feshbach resonances below the s-wave limit, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011051 (2025)

    2025

  20. [22]

    Magnetic Feshbach resonances in Ba$^+$+Li collisions due to strong spin-orbit coupling

    M. Morita, J. Siemund, W. Wu, D. von Schoenfeld, J. Grieshaber, A. Wojciechowska, K. Jachymski, T. Walker, F. Thielemann, T. Schaetz, and M. Tomza, Magnetic Fes- hbach resonances in Ba ++Li collisions due to strong spin-orbit coupling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12936 10.48550/arXiv.2507.12936 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12936 2025

  21. [23]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P . Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbac h res- onances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  22. [24]

    Casteels, J

    W. Casteels, J. Tempere, and J. T. Devreese, Polaronic p rop- erties of an ion in a Bose-Einstein condensate in the strong- coupling limit, J. Low Temp. Phys. 162, 266 (2011)

    2011

  23. [25]

    Hirzler, E

    H. Hirzler, E. Trimby, R. S. Lous, G. C. Groenen- boom, R. Gerritsma, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Controlling the na - ture of a charged impurity in a bath of Feshbach dimers, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033232 (2020)

    2020

  24. [26]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. P . Ardila, R. Schmidt, K. Jach ymski, and A. Negretti, Ionic polaron in a Bose-Einstein condensat e, Commun. Phys. 4, 94 (2021) . 8

    2021

  25. [27]

    E. R. Christensen, A. Camacho-Guardian, and G. M. Bruun , Charged polarons and molecules in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 243001 (2021)

    2021

  26. [28]

    S. Ding, M. Drewsen, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Medi- ated interaction between ions in quantum degenerate gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 153401 (2022)

    2022

  27. [29]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. P . Ardila, K. Jachymski, and A. Negretti, Many-body bound states and induced interactions of charged impurities in a bosonic bath, Nat. Commun. 14, 1647 (2023)

    2023

  28. [30]

    Pessoa, S

    R. Pessoa, S. A. Vitiello, and L. A. P . n. Ardila, Fermi polaron in atom-ion hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233002 (2024)

    2024

  29. [31]

    Weber, J

    T. Weber, J. Herbig, M. Mark, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and R. Grimm , Three-body recombination at large scattering lengths in an ul- tracold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 123201 (2003)

    2003

  30. [32]

    Braaten and H.-W

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few-body s ys- tems with large scattering length, Phys. Rep. 428, 259 (2006)

    2006

  31. [33]

    C. H. Greene, P . Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Universal few-body physics and cluster formation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035006 (2017)

    2017

  32. [34]

    Naidon and S

    P . Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 056001 (2017)

    2017

  33. [35]

    J. P . D’Incao, Few-body physics in resonantly interact ing ultra- cold quantum gases, J. Phys. B 51, 043001 (2018)

    2018

  34. [36]

    J. Wolf, M. Deiß, A. Kr¨ ukow, E. Tiemann, B. P . Ruzic, Y . Wang, J. P . D’Incao, P . S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, State - to-state chemistry for three-body recombination in an ultr acold rubidium gas, Science 358, 921 (2017)

    2017

  35. [37]

    S. Haze, J. P . D’Incao, D. Dorer, M. Deiß, E. Tiemann, P . S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Spin-Conservation Propensity Rule for Three-Body Recombination of Ultracold Rb Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 133401 (2022)

    2022

  36. [38]

    S. Haze, J. P . D’Incao, D. Dorer, J. Li, M. Deiß, E. Tieman n, P . S. Julienne, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Energy scaling of th e product state distribution for three-body recombination of ultra- cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013161 (2023)

    2023

  37. [39]

    Haze, J.-L

    S. Haze, J.-L. Li, D. Dorer, J. D’Incao, P . S. Julienne, E. Tiemann, M. Deiß, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Control- ling few-body reaction pathways using a Feshbach resonance , Nat. Phys. 21, 228 (2025)

    2025

  38. [40]

    J.-L. Li, P . S. Julienne, J. Hecker Denschlag, and J. P . D’Incao, Spin hierarchy in van der waals molecule formation via ultracold three-body recombination, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013308 (2025)

    2025

  39. [41]

    Dorer, S

    D. Dorer, S. Haze, J.-L. Li, J. P . D’Incao, E. Tiemann, P . S. Julienne, M. Deiß, and J. H. Denschlag, Steering reaction flux by coupling product channels, arXiv:2504.21727 (2025) , 2504.21727

    arXiv 2025

  40. [42]

    P´ erez-R´ ıos, S

    J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, S. Ragole, J. Wang, and C. H. Greene, Compar- ison of classical and quantal calculations of helium three- body recombination, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 044307 (2014)

    2014

  41. [43]

    P´ erez-R´ ıos and C

    J. P´ erez-R´ ıos and C. H. Greene, Communication: Class ical threshold law for ion-neutral-neutral three-body recombination, J. Chem. Phys. 143, 041105 (2015)

    2015

  42. [44]

    P´ erez-R´ ıos and C

    J. P´ erez-R´ ıos and C. H. Greene, Universal temperature depen- dence of the ion-neutral-neutral three-body recombinatio n rate, Phys. Rev. A 98, 062707 (2018)

    2018

  43. [45]

    P´ erez-R´ ıos, Cold chemistry: a few-body perspecti ve on impurity physics of a single ion in an ultracold bath, Mol

    J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Cold chemistry: a few-body perspecti ve on impurity physics of a single ion in an ultracold bath, Mol. Phys. 119, e1881637 (2021)

    2021

  44. [46]

    Mirahmadi and J

    M. Mirahmadi and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Three-body recombination in physical chemistry, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 233 (2022)

    2022

  45. [47]

    Londo˜ no, J

    M. Londo˜ no, J. Madro˜ nero, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Cold a tom- ion systems in radio-frequency multipole traps: Event- driven molecular dynamics and stochastic simulations, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053324 (2023)

    2023

  46. [48]

    Helfrich, H.-W

    K. Helfrich, H.-W. Hammer, and D. S. Petrov, Three-body problem in heteronuclear mixtures with resonant interspec ies interaction, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042715 (2010)

    2010

  47. [49]

    Y . Wang, J. Wang, J. P . D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Uni- versal three-body parameter in heteronuclear atomic syste ms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 243201 (2012)

    2012

  48. [50]

    Naidon, S

    P . Naidon, S. Endo, and M. Ueda, Microscopic origin and universality classes of the Efimov three-body parameter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 105301 (2014)

    2014

  49. [51]

    H. Suno, B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and J. P . Burke, Three-body recombination of cold helium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042725 (2002)

    2002

  50. [52]

    J. Wang, J. P . D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Numerical study of three-body recombination for systems with many bound state s, Phys. Rev. A 84, 052721 (2011)

    2011

  51. [53]

    Derevianko, W

    A. Derevianko, W. R. Johnson, M. S. Safronova, and J. F. B abb, High-precision calculations of dispersion coefficients, s tatic dipole polarizabilities, and atom-wall interaction const ants for alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3589 (1999)

    1999

  52. [54]

    Jeziorski, R

    B. Jeziorski, R. Moszynski, and K. Szalewicz, Perturba tion the- ory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces o f van der waals complexes, Chem. Rev. 94, 1887 (1994)

    1994

  53. [55]

    A. J. Moerdijk, W. C. Stwalley, R. G. Hulet, and B. J. V erhaar, Negative scattering length of ultracold 7Li gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 40 (1994)

    1994

  54. [56]

    E. R. I. Abraham, W. I. McAlexander, C. A. Sackett, and R. G. Hulet, Spectroscopic determination of the s-wave scattering length of lithium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1315 (1995)

    1995

  55. [57]

    S. E. Pollack, D. Dries, M. Junker, Y . P . Chen, T. A. Corcovilos, and R. G. Hulet, Extreme tunabil- ity of interactions in a 7Li Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 090402 (2009)

    2009

  56. [58]

    J. Wang, J. P . D’Incao, Y . Wang, and C. H. Greene, Univer- sal three-body recombination via resonant d-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. A 86, 062511 (2012)

    2012

  57. [59]

    N. P . Mehta, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. P . D’Incao, J. von Stec her, and C. H. Greene, General theoretical description of n-body recombination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 153201 (2009)

    2009

  58. [60]

    B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and H. Suno, Threshold laws for three-body recombination, Phys. Rev. A 65, 010705 (2001)

    2001

  59. [61]

    J. P . D’Incao and B. D. Esry, Scattering length scaling laws for ultracold three-body collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 213201 (2005)

    2005

  60. [62]

    J. Wang, J. P . D’Incao, B. D. Esry, and C. H. Greene, Ori- gin of the three-body parameter universality in Efimov physi cs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 263001 (2012)

    2012

  61. [63]

    From this perspective, our results for LiLiBa and LiLiB a+ sys- tems partially confirm university classes classification of [47] since we found that L3 for LiLiBa is expected to display an Efimov resonance at aBX = a− ≈ − 200rvdW while LiLiBa + does not [see Fig. 2(a)]

  62. [64]

    V . V . Flambaum, G. F. Gribakin, and C. Hara- bati, Analytical calculation of cold-atom scattering, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1998 (1999)

    1998

  63. [65]

    H. R. Sadeghpour, J. L. Bohn, M. J. Cavagnero, B. D. Esry, I. I. Fabrikant, J. H. Macek, and A. R. P . Rau, Collisions near thresh- old in atomic and molecular physics, J. Phys. B 33, R93 (2000)

    2000

  64. [66]

    T. F. O’Malley, L. Rosenberg, and L. Spruch, Low-energy scat- tering of a charged particle by a neutral polarizable system , Phys. Rev. 125, 1300 (1962)

    1962

  65. [67]

    S. J. Buckman and J. Mitroy, Analysis of low-energy elec - tron scattering cross sections via effective-range theory , 9 J. Phys. B 22, 1365 (1989)

    1989

  66. [68]

    Odell, A

    D. Odell, A. Deltuva, and L. Platter, V an der waals in- teraction as the starting point for an effective field theory , Phys. Rev. A 104, 023306 (2021)

    2021

  67. [69]

    Odell, D

    D. Odell, D. R. Phillips, and U. van Kolck, Effective field theory for the bound states and scattering of a heavy charged partic le and a neutral atom, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062817 (2023)

    2023

  68. [70]

    L. W. Bruch and K. Sawada, Inequality relating the ground-state energies of two and three bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 25 (1973)

    1973

  69. [71]

    M. D. Lee, T. K¨ ohler, and P . S. Julienne, Excited thomas-efimov levels in ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012720 (2007)

    2007

  70. [72]

    P . M. A. Mestrom, J. Wang, C. H. Greene, and J. P . D’Incao, Efimov–van der waals universality for ultracold atoms with pos- itive scattering lengths, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032707 (2017)

    2017

  71. [73]

    Nielsen, H

    E. Nielsen, H. Suno, and B. D. Esry, Efimov resonances in atom-diatom scattering, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012705 (2002)

    2002

  72. [74]

    Cˆ ot´ e, V

    R. Cˆ ot´ e, V . Kharchenko, and M. D. Lukin, Meso- scopic molecular ions in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 093001 (2002)

    2002

  73. [75]

    Doerk, Z

    H. Doerk, Z. Idziaszek, and T. Calarco, Atom-ion quantum gate, Phys. Rev. A 81, 012708 (2010)

    2010

  74. [76]

    Gerritsma, A

    R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, H. Doerk, Z. Idziaszek, T. Ca larco, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Bosonic Josephson junction controll ed by a single trapped ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 080402 (2012)

    2012

  75. [77]

    Calle Cord´ on and E

    A. Calle Cord´ on and E. Ruiz Arriola, Low-energy universality and scaling of van der Waals forces, Phys. Rev. A 81, 044701 (2010)

    2010

  76. [78]

    B. R. Levy and J. B. Keller, Low-energy expansion of scattering phase shifts for long-range potentials, J. Math. Phys. 4, 54 (1963)

    1963

  77. [79]

    Spruch, T

    L. Spruch, T. F. O’Malley, and L. Rosenberg, Modificatio n of effective-range theory in the presence of a long-range pote ntial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 375 (1960)

    1960