Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 176 references

Thermodynamic Length in Stochastic Thermodynamics of Far-From-Equilibrium Systems: Unification of Fluctuation Relation and Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that far-from-equilibrium discrete-state stochastic systems obey a minimum action principle whose rate functional makes the fluctuation relation and the non-quadratic thermodynamic-kinetic uncertainty relation two faces of

desk verdict Useful variational framework, but the 'exact LDP' claim is not supported by the derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.00970 v3 pith:OQNZRHE5 submitted 2025-11-02 cond-mat.stat-mech

Atul Tanaji Mohite , Heiko Rieger This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords stochasticthermodynamicsminimumactionprinciplethermodynamiclengthlargedeviationtheoryuncertaintyrelationfluctuationentropyproductioninferencecoarse-grainedcurrents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central aim is to give discrete-state stochastic thermodynamics a unifying variational principle, a non-equilibrium analogue of the Boltzmann distribution. It constructs an exact path-integral representation of the transition dynamics and shows that, after optimizing over the conjugate field, the action Lagrangian is the inferred entropy production rate, written as a non-quadratic dissipation function of the stochastic current and traffic: 2J tanh⁻¹(J/T). From this single object the paper derives an exact large-deviation rate functional, a non-quadratic thermodynamic-kinetic uncertainty relation, and the fluctuation relation, so the two previously separate laws appear as the inference and control faces of one minimum action principle. The same structure is extended to coarse-grained observable currents, making the bounds usable from partial experimental measurements. A sympathetic reader should take away: if this holds, far-from-equilibrium fluctuations are governed by one canonical distribution-like principle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective Lagrangian L*[{J,T}] = Σ_γ 2J_γ tanh⁻¹(J_γ/T_γ), a non-quadratic dissipation function of the stochastic current J (the time-antisymmetric part of the transition flux) and the traffic T (the time-symmetric part). It is produced from an exact second-quantized path-integral representation of the discrete-state dynamics, translated into density and conjugate-field variables; the resulting Lagrangian is concave in the conjugate field, and its supremum at the effective affinity 2tanh⁻¹(J/T) yields the effective Lagrangian. The paper treats this extremization as an exact saddle point, so the same functional serves as the finite-time entropy-production bound,

What would settle it

Compute, for a simple Markov network (say a three- or four-state unicyclic chain with arbitrarily large affinities), the true finite-time rate function by diagonalizing the tilted generator for the time-integrated current and traffic, and compare it with I = 2J̃ tanh⁻¹(J̃/T̃). If the numerical rate function differs from this closed form beyond subexponential corrections, the claimed exactness of the rate functional fails; a simpler two-state test would directly check whether the probability of time-integrated current and traffic satisfies the exponential form with that functional and no additi

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a discrete-state system whose transitions satisfy local detailed balance, the paper constructs an exact path-integral representation of the transition probability measure, written as the exponential of an action in current, traffic, and conjugate-field variables. Because the Lagrangian is concave in the conjugate field, its supremum is attained at the effective affinity 2tanh⁻¹(J/T); substituting this gives the effective Lagrangian L* = Σ_γ 2J_γ tanh⁻¹(J_γ/T_γ). The paper identifies this expression with the entropy production rate inferred from the observed current and traffic, without prior knowledge of the transition affinities, and elevates the resulting variational problem to a minim

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on treating the extremization over the conjugate field as an exact saddle point and then reading the resulting finite-time inequality as the exact large-deviation rate functional without separately integrating over density paths or enforcing the continuity equation; if that step is only an approximation, the claimed exact large-deviation principle and the tighter bounds do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the rate functional is exact, the non-quadratic thermodynamic-kinetic uncertainty relation gives strictly tighter dissipation bounds than the quadratic Gaussian form for far-from-equilibrium processes, so experimental current-and-traffic measurements can infer entropy production more accurately.
  • Fluctuation relation and thermodynamic-kinetic uncertainty relation no longer need separate derivations: both follow from the same minimum-action functional, with the fluctuation relation appearing when transition affinities are known and the uncertainty relation when they are inferred.
  • Speed limits and fluctuation functionals become non-quadratic, improving finite-time thermodynamic bounds and descriptions of fluctuations around non-equilibrium steady states.
  • Coarse-grained observable currents satisfy the same bound structure, so the results apply to partial measurements; the bound becomes tight when all microscopic transitions sharing one effective affinity are grouped into one observable.
  • The min-max formulation offers a numerical variational route to entropy production and rare-event statistics for networks without exact analytical solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the proposed rate functional is scale-free in current precision; if exact, it implies a universal relation between precision and scaled entropy production that should be testable in single-molecule or colloidal experiments that simultaneously resolve a current and its activity.
  • Beyond the paper: the claimed exactness of the saddle point suggests the second-quantized path integral for discrete-state systems has an exactness that may extend to hypergraph reaction networks with state-dependent rates, which the paper notes is a technical rather than conceptual extension.
  • Beyond the paper: the MinEP/MaxEP regimes identified by the min-max principle might resolve the long-standing debate over maximum entropy production by showing both are limits of one variational principle; checking which regime a driven biochemical network selects would be a concrete test.
  • Beyond the paper: if the effective affinity can be measured from time series, it provides a model-free estimate of non-equilibrium driving strength that does not require knowing transition rates or the underlying graph, potentially extending thermodynamic inference to systems with hidden degrees of freedom.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a variational (minimum-action) formulation for discrete-state stochastic thermodynamics. Using a Doi-Peliti path integral and a Cole-Hopf transformation, it derives a Lagrangian in terms of current and traffic, extremizes over the conjugate affinity, and obtains an effective Lagrangian L* = Σ_γ 2J_γ tanh^{-1}(J_γ/T_γ), interpreted as an inferred entropy production rate. Jensen's inequality then yields a finite-time thermodynamic-length inequality (Eq. 17). The paper further claims an exact large-deviation rate functional (Eq. 18), a unification of the fluctuation relation and the non-quadratic TKUR, an extension to coarse-grained observable currents, and applications to speed limits and fluctuation-response relations.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the non-quadratic thermodynamic-length inequality and its tighter bounds on entropy production would be a genuinely useful contribution to stochastic thermodynamics. The coarse-grained formulation and the explicit connection to information geometry are also attractive. However, the exact large-deviation principle is the load-bearing element of the claimed unification, and it is not derived. The variational inequality itself is plausible and potentially publishable, but the manuscript's main advertised result—an exact LDP unifying FR and TKUR—is currently unsupported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3A (Eq. 18)] The claimed exact LDP is not derived. Eq. (18) is obtained by 'combining Eqs. (13) and (17)', but Eq. (17) is a Jensen inequality, not an exact evaluation of the contracted action. No integration over the density path and no enforcement of the continuity equation ∂_t ρ = S J is performed. A genuine LDP for empirical currents/traffics requires a spectral analysis of the tilted generator or a proper contraction from the full path measure. Moreover, the proposed rate function does not vanish at the steady-state typical values: I(J_ss,T_ss)=2J_ss tanh^{-1}(J_ss/T_ss)=σ_ss>0. For a normalized LDP P ≍ e^{-τI}, the rate function should vanish at the mean. This indicates a missing normalization/affine subtraction, and it undermines the claimed unification.
  2. [§2.2C (Eq. 15)] The statement that 'the saddle-point approximation parameter is 1' is asserted without proof. The exact transition probability is a path integral over the conjugate field χ, not e^{-sup_χ S}. Replacing the integral by the supremum is a Laplace/saddle-point approximation that requires a large parameter; no such parameter is identified. The subsequent exactness of Eq. (16), and therefore of the thermodynamic-length inequality and the LDP, depends on this unsupported step. Either the saddle-point corrections must be shown to vanish, or the results must be labeled as a variational approximation rather than exact.
  3. [§4.2A (Eqs. 38–40)] The derivation of the fluctuation relation is circular. The integrated FR, ⟨e^{-τA·J̃}⟩=1, is a property of the exact path measure; it cannot be inferred from 'normalization' of the asymptotic, unnormalized LDP Eq. (33). The detailed FR log ratio in Eq. (38) requires the Gallavotti-Cohen symmetry of the scaled cumulant generating function, which is not established for the rate function of Eq. (18). Substituting J=2D sinh(A/2) and T=2D cosh(A/2) into Eq. (16) only recovers the mean EPR expression; it does not by itself produce the FR.
  4. [§3.2A (Eqs. 31 and 34)] The contraction-principle derivation for coarse-grained observables inherits the exact-LDP problem and additionally omits the continuity equation. Eq. (34) minimizes L* over instantaneous J_γ, T_γ without constraining the paths by ∂_t ρ = S J. A correct contraction of a dynamical rate functional must include the density dynamics. Therefore Eq. (31) and the observable LDP Eq. (33) are not established. This affects the claimed experimental/numerical applicability of the exact results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2A (Eq. 34)] There is a typo in the second constraint: it should read T_o - 𝕆T_γ rather than T_o - 𝕆J_γ.
  2. [§2.2A] Typo: 'coherant' should be 'coherent'.
  3. [§2.3D (Eq. 29)] The hierarchy f(x) ≥ f_G(x) ≥ f_D(x) should state the domain of validity (e.g. 0 ≤ x < 1) and the precise definitions used in the figure, since f_D is expressed in terms of x=J/(2D) whereas f and f_G use x=J/T.
  4. [§2.2A (Eq. 7)] The path integral measure and normalization are only discussed in a footnote. Since exactness is central, the integration measure, boundary terms, and the continuum-time convention (Itô/Stratonovich) should be specified precisely.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central 'exact LDP' and 'inferred EPR' are definitional/constructed: Eq. (18) reuses the Legendre-transform function of Eq. (16) evaluated at time-averaged values, and the FR is recovered from normalization of that assumed LDP.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.2C, Eqs. (15)-(16)]
    "L∗[{Jγ,Tγ}] = sup_{χγ} L[{Jγ,Tγ,χγ}] ... the 'effective' Lagrangian L∗ reads: Σ̇ = L∗[{Jγ,Tγ}] = Σ_{γ⇌} 2Jγ tanh−1(Jγ/Tγ). ... If the transition affinities have been known, eq. (16) is equal to the mean transition EPR. This follows trivially using analytical expressions Jγ=2Dγ sinh(Aγ/2) and Tγ=2Dγ cosh(Aγ/2) which implies χ∗γ=Aγ."

    L* is defined as the supremum of the Lagrangian over the conjugate field χ. Calling this extremal value the 'inferred EPR' is a renaming of the definition. The subsequent identification with the thermodynamic EPR for known affinities is an algebraic substitution of the local detailed-balance relations J=2D sinh(A/2), T=2D cosh(A/2), which by construction force χ*=A. No independent relation between the variational action and thermodynamic dissipation is derived at this step.

  2. self definitional [Section 2.3A, Eqs. (17)-(18)]
    "τΣ=Σ=S∗DP=∫L∗dt ≥ Σ 2τJ̃γ tanh−1(J̃γ/T̃γ) ... We combine eqs. (13) and (17) and obtain the exact LDP ... P[J̃γ,T̃γ]≍e^{−τI[{J̃γ,T̃γ}]}, where, I[J̃γ,T̃γ]=2J̃γ tanh−1(J̃γ/T̃γ) is the exact dynamical rate functional."

    The proposed rate functional I is literally L* from Eq. (16) evaluated at the time-averaged pair (J̃,T̃). Eq. (17) is Jensen's inequality for the path action, not a saddle-point evaluation of the path integral constrained to fixed time-averaged current and traffic; no contraction over paths with ∂_t ρ = S J is performed. Thus the large-deviation statement is an ansatz labeled 'exact': the rate function is inserted by construction rather than obtained from the tilted-generator/spectral problem that defines LDPs for Markov chains.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4.2A, Eq. (33) and following]
    "One observes that the normalization condition for the probability distribution eq. (33) trivially implies the integrated FR ⟨e^{−τ(χ∗o)^T J̃o}⟩=1."

    Eq. (33) is the assumed LDP with exponent τχ*·J̃. Imposing normalization of this assumed measure is exactly the statement ⟨e^{−τχ*·J̃}⟩=1, so the 'recovered' FR is a restatement of the normalization of the ansatz, not an independent consequence of a separately proven fluctuation theorem. Setting χ*=A completes the circle: the FR is put in through the assumed form of the rate functional.

full rationale

The Doi-Peliti path-integral representation (Eqs. 7-13), the Legendre-type extremization over χ, and the Jensen inequality leading to Eq. (17) are internally consistent and are not dependent on self-citation. However, the central interpretative and LDP claims reduce to definitions: Eq. (16) defines 'inferred EPR' as the extremal Lagrangian, and Eq. (18) takes that same Lagrangian evaluated at time-averaged values and calls it the exact large-deviation rate functional without performing the required contraction over path space or enforcing the continuity equation. Consequently, the 'non-quadratic TL/TKUR' bounds and the 'recovery' of the FR inherit this construction: the FR follows from normalizing the assumed LDP. The paper's self-citations [5,6,86] support the formalism but are not the principal source of circularity; the circularity is that the central exact-LDP claim is an ansatz relabeled as a derivation. Because the underlying path-integral algebra is non-circular, a score of 6 rather than 8-10 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on LDB and Markov/DPFT assumptions, a state-independent-rate simplification, and most critically on the saddle-point approximation being exact. The Jensen/convexity step is standard. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'inferred entropy production rate' is a derived estimator, not an invented entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local Detailed Balance (LDB): A_γ = log(j_γ/j_-γ) = F_γ - Δ_γE + Δ_γS_state
    LDB connects transition directionality to thermodynamic driving, standard in stochastic thermodynamics but still an assumption about the physical system. Invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Transition rates are independent of state occupancy
    Required for normal-ordered Doi-Peliti operators and the exact coherent-state path integral; the authors defer state-dependent rates to a 'technical sophistication' (Section 2.2A).
  • ad hoc to paper Saddle-point approximation with 'parameter 1' gives the exact transition probability / LDP
    The exact transition probability is replaced by the exponential of the extremal action (Section 2.2C). No large parameter justifies this for finite τ, and the LDP derivation depends on it.
  • domain assumption Large-deviation scaling with the observation time τ and positive bidirectional transition rates
    The LDP P ≍ e^{-τI} (eq. 18) assumes extensive time scaling and absolute continuity of forward vs backward path measures (footnote 118).
  • standard math Convexity of L* and Jensen's inequality
    Used to pass from eq. (16) to the time-integrated inequality (17); standard and valid.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamic Length in Stochastic Thermodynamics of Far-From-Equilibrium Systems: Unification of Fluctuation Relation and Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OQNZRHE5

@misc{pith2026251100970,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamic Length in Stochastic Thermodynamics of Far-From-Equilibrium Systems: Unification of Fluctuation Relation and Thermodynamic Uncertainty Relation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OQNZRHE5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.00970}
}
read the original abstract

The Boltzmann distribution for an equilibrium system constrains the statistics of the system by the energetics. Despite the non-equilibrium generalization of the Boltzmann distribution being studied extensively, a unified framework valid for far-from-equilibrium discrete state systems is lacking. Here, we derive an exact path-integral representation for discrete state processes and represent it using the exponential of the action for stochastic transition dynamics. Solving the variational problem, the effective action is shown to be equal to the inferred entropy production rate (a thermodynamic quantity) and a non-quadratic dissipation function of the thermodynamic length (TL) defined for microscopic stochastic currents (a dynamic quantity). This formulates a far-from-equilibrium analog of the Boltzmann distribution, namely, the minimum action principle. The non-quadratic dissipation function is physically attributed to incorporating non-Gaussian fluctuations or far-from-equilibrium non-conservative driving. Further, an exact large deviation dynamical rate functional is derived. The equivalence of the variational formulation with the information geometric formulation is proved. The non-quadratic TL recovers the non-quadratic thermodynamic-kinetic uncertainty relation (TKUR) and the speed limits, which are tighter than the close-to-equilibrium quadratic formulations. Moreover, if the transition affinities are known, the non-quadratic TL recovers the fluctuation relation (FR). The minimum action principle manifests the non-quadratic TKUR and FR as two faces corresponding to the thermodynamic inference and partial control descriptions, respectively. In addition, the validity of these results is extended to coarse-grained observable currents, strengthening the experimental/numerical applicability of them.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00970 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Lagrangian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Boltzmann,Lectures on Gas Theory(University of California Press, Berkeley, 1964)

    L. Boltzmann,Lectures on Gas Theory(University of California Press, Berkeley, 1964)

    1964

  2. [2]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems 15 and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 126001 (2012)

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems 15 and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 126001 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Sekimoto,Stochastic Energetics(Courier Corporation, 2010)

    K. Sekimoto,Stochastic Energetics(Courier Corporation, 2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Shiraishi,An Introduction to Stochastic Thermodynamics: From Basic to Advanced(Springer Nature Singapore, Singa- pore, 2023) pp

    N. Shiraishi,An Introduction to Stochastic Thermodynamics: From Basic to Advanced(Springer Nature Singapore, Singa- pore, 2023) pp. 31–47

    2023

  5. [5]

    A. T. Mohite and H. Rieger, Stochastic thermodynamics of non-reciprocally interacting particles and fields (2025), arXiv:2504.10515 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    A. T. Mohite and H. Rieger, Thermodynamically consis- tent coarse-graining: from interacting particles to fields via second quantization (2025), arXiv:2508.11430 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Schnakenberg, Network theory of microscopic and macro- scopic behavior of master equation systems, Rev

    J. Schnakenberg, Network theory of microscopic and macro- scopic behavior of master equation systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 571 (1976)

    1976

  8. [8]

    G. N. Bochkov and I. E. Kuzovlev, General theory of thermal fluctuations in nonlinear systems, Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki72, 238 (1977)

    1977

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    G. N. Bochkov and Y. E. Kuzovlev, Fluctuation-dissipation relations for nonequilibrium processes in open systems, So- viet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics49, 543 (1979)

    1979

  2. [10]

    D. J. Evans, E. G. D. Cohen, and G. P. Morriss, Probability of second law violations in shearing steady states, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 2401 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    D. J. Evans and D. J. Searles, Equilibrium microstates which generate second law violating steady states, Phys. Rev. E50, 1645 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differ- ences, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differ- ences, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2690 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Jarzynski, Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach, Phys. Rev. E56, 5018 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. E60, 2721 (1999)

    1999

  7. [15]

    Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0009244 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    H. Tasaki, Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0009244 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [16]

    G. E. Crooks, Path-ensemble averages in systems driven far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E61, 2361 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netočný, Time-reversal and entropy, Journal of Statistical Physics110, 269 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    Gallavotti and E

    G. Gallavotti and E. G. D. Cohen, Dynamical ensembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2694 (1995)

    1995

  11. [19]

    J. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, A gallavotti–cohen-type symme- try in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics95, 333 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Kurchan, Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31, 3719 (1998)

    J. Kurchan, Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31, 3719 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Sekimoto, Kinetic characterization of heat bath and the en- ergetics of thermal ratchet models, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan66, 1234 (1997)

    K. Sekimoto, Kinetic characterization of heat bath and the en- ergetics of thermal ratchet models, Journal of the Physical So- ciety of Japan66, 1234 (1997)

    1997

  14. [22]

    Sekimoto, Langevin Equation and Thermodynamics, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement130, 17 (1998)

    K. Sekimoto, Langevin Equation and Thermodynamics, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement130, 17 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic trajectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys

    U. Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic trajectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 040602 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Andrieux and P

    D. Andrieux and P. Gaspard, Fluctuation theorem for cur- rents and schnakenberg network theory, Journal of Statistical Physics127, 107 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Andrieux and P

    D. Andrieux and P. Gaspard, Network and thermodynamic conditions for a single macroscopic current fluctuation theo- rem, Comptes Rendus. Physique8, 579 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Touchette, The large deviation approach to statistical me- chanics, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    H. Touchette, The large deviation approach to statistical me- chanics, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Gilmore, Uncertainty relations of statistical mechanics, Phys

    R. Gilmore, Uncertainty relations of statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. A31, 3237 (1985)

    1985

  20. [28]

    Uffink and J

    J. Uffink and J. van Lith, Thermodynamic uncertainty rela- tions, Foundations of Physics29, 655 (1999)

    1999

  21. [29]

    J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations constrain non-equilibrium fluctuations, Na- ture Physics16, 15 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty rela- tion for biomolecular processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 158101 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. England, Dissipation bounds all steady-state current fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120601 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Proof of the finite-time thermodynamic uncertainty relation for steady-state cur- rents, Phys. Rev. E96, 020103 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Di Terlizzi and M

    I. Di Terlizzi and M. Baiesi, Kinetic uncertainty relation, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 02LT03 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Kwon, J.-M

    E. Kwon, J.-M. Park, J. S. Lee, and Y. Baek, Unified hierarchi- cal relationship between thermodynamic tradeoff relations, Phys. Rev. E110, 044131 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Van Vu and K

    T. Van Vu and K. Saito, Thermodynamic unification of op- timal transport: Thermodynamic uncertainty relation, mini- mum dissipation, and thermodynamic speed limits, Phys. Rev. X13, 011013 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    V. T. Vo, T. V. Vu, and Y. Hasegawa, Unified thermody- namic–kinetic uncertainty relation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 405004 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    V. T. Vo, T. Van Vu, and Y. Hasegawa, Unified approach to classical speed limit and thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. E102, 062132 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    J. S. Lee, S. Lee, H. Kwon, and H. Park, Speed limit for a highly irreversible process and tight finite-time landauer’s bound, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 120603 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Ito, Stochastic thermodynamic interpretation of informa- tion geometry, Phys

    S. Ito, Stochastic thermodynamic interpretation of informa- tion geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 030605 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Merhav and Y

    N. Merhav and Y. Kafri, Statistical properties of entropy pro- duction derived from fluctuation theorems, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, P12022 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Hasegawa and T

    Y. Hasegawa and T. Van Vu, Fluctuation theorem uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 110602 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    A. M. Timpanaro, G. Guarnieri, J. Goold, and G. T. Landi, Thermodynamic uncertainty relations from exchange fluctu- ation theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090604 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Francica, Fluctuation theorems and thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations, Phys

    G. Francica, Fluctuation theorems and thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations, Phys. Rev. E105, 014129 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    M. J. Klein and P. H. Meijer, Principle of minimum entropy production, Physical Review96, 250 (1954)

    1954

  37. [45]

    H. B. Callen, Principle of minimum entropy production, Phys. Rev.105, 360 (1957)

    1957

  38. [46]

    Glansdorff, G

    P. Glansdorff, G. Nicolis, and I. Prigogine, The thermody- namic stability theory of non-equilibrium states, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences71, 197 (1974)

    1974

  39. [47]

    E. T. Jaynes, The minimum entropy production principle, An- nual Review of Physical Chemistry31, 579 (1980)

    1980

  40. [48]

    Struchtrup and W

    H. Struchtrup and W. Weiss, Maximum of the local entropy production becomes minimal in stationary processes, Phys. 16 Rev. Lett.80, 5048 (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    Qian, Entropy production and excess entropy in a nonequi- librium steady-state of single macromolecules, Phys

    H. Qian, Entropy production and excess entropy in a nonequi- librium steady-state of single macromolecules, Phys. Rev. E 65, 021111 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    R. M. L. Evans, Rules for transition rates in nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 150601 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    R. M. L. Evans, Detailed balance has a counterpart in non- equilibrium steady states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General38, 293 (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Lecomte, C

    V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland, and F. van Wijland, Chaotic properties of systems with markov dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010601 (2005)

    2005

  45. [53]

    Martyushev and V

    L. Martyushev and V. Seleznev, Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology, Physics Reports 426, 1 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Wang, Maximum entropy change and least action principle for nonequilibrium systems, Astrophysics and Space Science 305, 273 (2006)

    Q. Wang, Maximum entropy change and least action principle for nonequilibrium systems, Astrophysics and Space Science 305, 273 (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    Bruers, C

    S. Bruers, C. Maes, and K. Netočný, On the validity of entropy production principles for linear electrical circuits, Journal of Statistical Physics129, 725 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Bruers, A discussion on maximum entropy production and information theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 7441 (2007)

    S. Bruers, A discussion on maximum entropy production and information theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 7441 (2007)

    2007

  49. [57]

    Lecomte, C

    V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland, and F. van Wijland, Thermo- dynamic formalism for systems with markov dynamics, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics127, 51 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Yoshida and S

    Z. Yoshida and S. M. Mahajan, “Maximum” entropy produc- tion in self-organized plasma boundary layer: A thermody- namic discussion about turbulent heat transport, Physics of Plasmas15, 032307 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    L. M. Martyushev, The maximum entropy production prin- ciple: two basic questions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences365, 1333 (2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    Baule and R

    A. Baule and R. M. L. Evans, Nonequilibrium statistical me- chanics of shear flow: invariant quantities and current rela- tions, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment2010, P03030 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    R. K. Niven, Simultaneous extrema in the entropy production for steady-state fluid flow in parallel pipes, Journal of Non- Equilibrium Thermodynamics35, 347 (2010)

    2010

  54. [62]

    Kawazura and Z

    Y. Kawazura and Z. Yoshida, Entropy production rate in a flux- driven self-organizing system, Phys. Rev. E82, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Doi, Onsager’s variational principle in soft matter, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 284118 (2011)

    M. Doi, Onsager’s variational principle in soft matter, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 284118 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    C. Monthus, Non-equilibrium steady states: maximization of the shannon entropy associated with the distribution of dy- namical trajectories in the presence of constraints, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2011, P03008 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    Kawazura and Z

    Y. Kawazura and Z. Yoshida, Comparison of entropy pro- duction rates in two different types of self-organized flows: Benard convection and zonal flow, Physics of Plasmas19, 012305 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Chetrite and H

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette, Nonequilibrium microcanoni- cal and canonical ensembles and their equivalence, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 120601 (2013)

    2013

  59. [67]

    Pressé, K

    S. Pressé, K. Ghosh, J. Lee, and K. A. Dill, Principles of maxi- mum entropy and maximum caliber in statistical physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1115 (2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    R. G. Endres, Entropy production selects nonequilibrium states in multistable systems, Scientific Reports7, 14437 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Bialek, Stability and noise in biochemical switches (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0005235 [cond-mat.soft]

    W. Bialek, Stability and noise in biochemical switches (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0005235 [cond-mat.soft]

    2000 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Sasai and P

    M. Sasai and P. G. Wolynes, Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences100, 2374 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    Y. Lan, P. G. Wolynes, and G. A. Papoian, A variational ap- proach to the stochastic aspects of cellular signal transduc- tion, The Journal of Chemical Physics125, 124106 (2006)

    2006

  64. [72]

    Vellela and H

    M. Vellela and H. Qian, Stochastic dynamics and non- equilibrium thermodynamics of a bistable chemical system: the schlögl model revisited, Journal of The Royal Society In- terface6, 925 (2009)

    2009

  65. [73]

    Bodineau and B

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, Current fluctuations in nonequi- librium diffusive systems: An additivity principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 180601 (2004)

    2004

  66. [74]

    B. Derrida, Non-equilibrium steady states: fluctuations and large deviations of the density and of the current, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P07023 (2007)

    2007

  67. [75]

    Prados, A

    A. Prados, A. Lasanta, and P. I. Hurtado, Large fluctuations in driven dissipative media, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140601 (2011)

    2011

  68. [76]

    P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Garrido, Spontaneous symmetry break- ing at the fluctuating level, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 180601 (2011)

    2011

  69. [77]

    C. P. Espigares, P. L. Garrido, and P. I. Hurtado, Dynamical phase transition for current statistics in a simple driven dif- fusive system, Phys. Rev. E87, 032115 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Bertini, A

    L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Macroscopic fluctuation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 593 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Qian, Y.-C

    H. Qian, Y.-C. Cheng, and Y.-J. Yang, Kinematic basis of emer- gent energetics of complex dynamics, Europhysics Letters 131, 50002 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Onsager and S

    L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Fluctuations and irreversible pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.91, 1505 (1953)

    1953

  73. [81]

    Machlup and L

    S. Machlup and L. Onsager, Fluctuations and irreversible pro- cess. ii. systems with kinetic energy, Phys. Rev.91, 1512 (1953)

    1953

  74. [82]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  75. [83]

    H.-K. Janssen, On a lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  76. [84]

    Bausch, H

    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Renormalized field theory of critical dynamics, Zeitschrift für Physik B Con- densed Matter24, 113 (1976)

    1976

  77. [85]

    de Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la théorie des champs et dynamique des phénomènes critiques, Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    C. de Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la théorie des champs et dynamique des phénomènes critiques, Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  78. [86]

    A. T. Mohite and H. Rieger, Minimum action principle for en- tropy production rate of far-from-equilibrium systems (2025), arXiv:2511.00967 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  79. [87]

    Doi, Second quantization representation for classical many-particle system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1465 (1976)

    M. Doi, Second quantization representation for classical many-particle system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1465 (1976)

    1976

  80. [88]

    Doi, Stochastic theory of diffusion-controlled reaction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1479 (1976)

    M. Doi, Stochastic theory of diffusion-controlled reaction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1479 (1976)

    1976

  81. [89]

    Peliti, Path integral approach to birth-death processes on a lattice, J

    L. Peliti, Path integral approach to birth-death processes on a lattice, J. Phys. France46, 1469 (1985)

    1985

  82. [90]

    Peliti, Renormalisation of fluctuation effects in the a+a to a reaction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General19, L365 (1986)

    L. Peliti, Renormalisation of fluctuation effects in the a+a to a reaction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General19, L365 (1986)

    1986

  83. [91]

    M. F. Weber and E. Frey, Master equations and the theory of stochastic path integrals, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 17 046601 (2017)

    2017

  84. [92]

    Salamon and R

    P. Salamon and R. S. Berry, Thermodynamic length and dissi- pated availability, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1127 (1983)

    1983

  85. [93]

    Salamon, J

    P. Salamon, J. D. Nulton, and R. S. Berry, Length in statistical thermodynamics, J. Chem. Phys.82, 2433 (1985)

    1985

  86. [94]

    Schlögl, Thermodynamic metric and stochastic measures, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter59, 449 (1985)

    F. Schlögl, Thermodynamic metric and stochastic measures, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter59, 449 (1985)

    1985

  87. [95]

    G. E. Crooks, Measuring thermodynamic length, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 100602 (2007)

    2007

  88. [96]

    Yoshimura and S

    K. Yoshimura and S. Ito, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation and thermodynamic speed limit in deterministic chemical re- action networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 160601 (2021)

    2021

  89. [97]

    Yoshimura and S

    K. Yoshimura and S. Ito, Information geometric inequalities of chemical thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013175 (2021)

    2021

  90. [98]

    Loutchko, Y

    D. Loutchko, Y. Sughiyama, and T. J. Kobayashi, Riemannian geometry of optimal driving and thermodynamic length and its application to chemical reaction networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043049 (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    G. L. Eyink, Action principle in nonequilibrium statistical dy- namics, Phys. Rev. E54, 3419 (1996)

    1996

  92. [100]

    W. E, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Minimum action method for the study of rare events, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics57, 637 (2004)

    2004

  93. [101]

    Heymann and E

    M. Heymann and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Pathways of maximum likelihood for rare events in nonequilibrium systems: Appli- cation to nucleation in the presence of shear, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140601 (2008)

    2008

  94. [102]

    Vanden-Eijnden and M

    E. Vanden-Eijnden and M. Heymann, The geometric mini- mum action method for computing minimum energy paths, The Journal of Chemical Physics128, 061103 (2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    P. C. Bressloff, Path-integral methods for analyzing the ef- fects of fluctuations in stochastic hybrid neural networks, The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience (JMN)5, 4 (2015)

    2015

  96. [104]

    Grafke, T

    T. Grafke, T. Schäfer, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Long term ef- fects of small random perturbations on dynamical systems: Theoretical and computational tools, inRecent Progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computational Science, edited by R. Melnik, R...

    2017

  97. [105]

    Grafke and E

    T. Grafke and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Numerical computation of rare events via large deviation theory, Chaos: An Interdisci- plinary Journal of Nonlinear Science29, 063118 (2019)

    2019

  98. [106]

    Gagrani and E

    P. Gagrani and E. Smith, Action functional gradient descent algorithm for estimating escape paths in stochastic chemical reaction networks, Phys. Rev. E107, 034305 (2023)

    2023

  99. [107]

    Zakine and E

    R. Zakine and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Minimum-action method for nonequilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. X13, 041044 (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    Smith, H

    E. Smith, H. B. Smith, and J. L. Andersen, Rules, hypergraphs, and probabilities: The three-level analysis of chemical reac- tion systems and other stochastic stoichiometric population processes, PLOS Complex Systems1, 1 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Cherukuri, B

    A. Cherukuri, B. Gharesifard, and J. Cortés, Saddle-point dy- namics: Conditions for asymptotic stability of saddle points, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization55, 486 (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    T. Lin, C. Jin, and M. Jordan, On gradient descent ascent for nonconvex-concave minimax problems, inProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, Proceed- ings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 119, edited by H. D. III and A. Singh (PMLR, 2020) pp. 6083–6093

    2020

  103. [111]

    J. Yan, H. Touchette, and G. M. Rotskoff, Learning nonequi- librium control forces to characterize dynamical phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. E105, 024115 (2022)

    2022

  104. [112]

    D.-K. Kim, Y. Bae, S. Lee, and H. Jeong, Learning entropy production via neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 140604 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    Otsubo, S

    S. Otsubo, S. Ito, A. Dechant, and T. Sagawa, Estimating en- tropy production by machine learning of short-time fluctuat- ing currents, Phys. Rev. E101, 062106 (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    Otsubo, S

    S. Otsubo, S. K. Manikandan, T. Sagawa, and S. Krishna- murthy, Estimating time-dependent entropy production from non-equilibrium trajectories, Communications Physics5, 11 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    S. A. Horiguchi and T. J. Kobayashi, Optimal control of stochastic reaction networks with entropic control cost and emergence of mode-switching strategies, PRX Life3, 033027 (2025)

    2025

  108. [116]

    Tottori and T

    T. Tottori and T. J. Kobayashi, Theory for optimal estimation and control under resource limitations and its applications to biological information processing and decision-making, Phys. Rev. Res. , (2025)

    2025

  109. [117]

    A. T. Mohite and H. Rieger, Generalized finite-time opti- mal control framework in stochastic thermodynamics (2025), arXiv:2511.00974 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  110. [118]

    We consider systems with all bidirectional transitions with positive transition rates, this is to ensure the absolute con- tinuousness of the forward path probability measure with re- spect to the conjugate path probability measure

  111. [119]

    Maes, Frenesy: Time-symmetric dynamical activity in nonequilibria, Physics Reports850, 1 (2020)

    C. Maes, Frenesy: Time-symmetric dynamical activity in nonequilibria, Physics Reports850, 1 (2020)

    2020

  112. [120]

    Maes, Frenetic bounds on the entropy production, Phys

    C. Maes, Frenetic bounds on the entropy production, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 160601 (2017)

    2017

  113. [121]

    (7) for the transition probability measure is trivially assumed by incorporating the probability normaliza- tion factor, ∫ 𝔻{𝜙∗ 𝑖}𝔻{𝜙𝑖}P 𝜙∗ 𝑖,𝜙𝑖 =1

    The equality in eq. (7) for the transition probability measure is trivially assumed by incorporating the probability normaliza- tion factor, ∫ 𝔻{𝜙∗ 𝑖}𝔻{𝜙𝑖}P 𝜙∗ 𝑖,𝜙𝑖 =1. Here,𝔻{𝜙 ∗ 𝑖}and 𝔻{𝜙𝑖}denote the path integral over all coherent-state eigen- values. Henceforth, we omit th...

  114. [122]

    Itakura, J

    K. Itakura, J. Ohkubo, and S. ichi Sasa, Two langevin equations in the doi–peliti formalism, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical43, 125001 (2010)

    2010

  115. [123]

    Lefevre and G

    A. Lefevre and G. Biroli, Dynamics of interacting particle sys- tems: stochastic process and field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P07024 (2007)

    2007

  116. [124]

    R. L. Stratonovich, On a Method of Calculating Quantum Dis- tribution Functions, Soviet Physics Doklady2, 416 (1957)

    1957

  117. [125]

    Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys

    J. Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959)

    1959

  118. [126]

    Kolchinsky, A

    A. Kolchinsky, A. Dechant, K. Yoshimura, and S. Ito, (2022), arXiv:2206.14599 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Kolchinsky, A

    A. Kolchinsky, A. Dechant, K. Yoshimura, and S. Ito, Gener- alized free energy and excess entropy production for active systems (2024), arXiv:2412.08432 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Amari and H

    S. Amari and H. Nagaoka,Methods of Information Geometry, Translations of mathematical monographs (American Math- ematical Society, 2000)

    2000

  121. [129]

    Due to ourbottom-up approach, we had identified the back- ward process on a microscopic level by decomposing the uni- directional transitional currents into its time-antisymmetric (𝐽𝛾 ) and time-symmetric (𝑇𝛾 ) components

  122. [130]

    M. O. Vlad and J. Ross, Thermodynamic approach to nonequi- librium chemical fluctuations, The Journal of Chemical Physics100, 7295 (1994)

    1994

  123. [131]

    M. O. Vlad and J. Ross, Random paths and fluctua- tion–dissipation dynamics for one-variable chemical systems far from equilibrium, The Journal of Chemical Physics100, 7279 (1994). 18

    1994

  124. [132]

    M. O. Vlad and J. Ross, Fluctuation–dissipation relations for chemical systems far from equilibrium, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics100, 7268 (1994)

    1994

  125. [133]

    Ross and M

    J. Ross and M. O. Vlad, Nonlinear kinetics and new approaches to complex reaction mechanisms, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry50, 51 (1999)

    1999

  126. [134]

    Maes and K

    C. Maes and K. Netočný, Canonical structure of dynamical fluctuations in mesoscopic nonequilibrium steady states, Eu- rophysics Letters82, 30003 (2008)

    2008

  127. [135]

    C. Maes, K. Netočný, and B. Wynants, Dynamical fluctuations for semi-markov processes, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical42, 365002 (2009)

    2009

  128. [136]

    Mielke, M

    A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. M. Renger, On the rela- tion between gradient flows and the large-deviation principle, with applications to markov chains and diffusion, Potential Analysis41, 1293 (2014)

    2014

  129. [137]

    Mielke, R

    A. Mielke, R. I. A. Patterson, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. Michiel Renger, Non-equilibrium thermodynamical princi- ples for chemical reactions with mass-action kinetics, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics77, 1562 (2017)

    2017

  130. [138]

    Kaiser, R

    M. Kaiser, R. L. Jack, and J. Zimmer, Canonical structure and orthogonality of forces and currents in irreversible markov chains, Journal of Statistical Physics170, 1019 (2018)

    2018

  131. [139]

    D. R. M. Renger and J. Zimmer, Orthogonality of fluxes in general nonlinear reaction networks, Discrete and Continu- ous Dynamical Systems - S14, 205 (2021)

    2021

  132. [140]

    M. A. Peletier, R. Rossi, G. Savaré, and O. Tse, Jump processes as generalized gradient flows, Calculus of Variations and Par- tial Differential Equations61, 33 (2022)

    2022

  133. [141]

    T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, and Y. Sughiyama, Hessian geometry of nonequilibrium chemical reaction net- works and entropy production decompositions, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033208 (2022)

    2022

  134. [142]

    T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, S. A. Horiguchi, and Y. Sughiyama, Information geometry of dynamics on graphs and hypergraphs, Information Geometry7, 97 (2024)

    2024

  135. [143]

    M. A. Peletier and A. Schlichting, Cosh gradient systems and tilting, Nonlinear Analysis231, 113094 (2023), variational Models for Discrete Systems

    2023

  136. [144]

    R. I. A. Patterson, D. R. M. Renger, and U. Sharma, Variational structures beyond gradient flows: a macroscopic fluctuation- theory perspective, Journal of Statistical Physics191, 18 (2024)

    2024

  137. [145]

    D. R. M. Renger, Macroscopic fluctuation theory versus large- deviation-induced generic (2024), arXiv:2402.04092 [math- ph]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [146]

    T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, and Y. Sughiyama, Kinetic derivation of the hessian geometric structure in chem- ical reaction networks, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033066 (2022)

    2022

  139. [147]

    Sughiyama, D

    Y. Sughiyama, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, and T. J. Kobayashi, Hessian geometric structure of chemical thermodynamic systems with stoichiometric constraints, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033065 (2022)

    2022

  140. [148]

    D. R. M. Renger and U. Sharma, Untangling dissipative and hamiltonian effects in bulk and boundary-driven systems, Phys. Rev. E108, 054123 (2023)

    2023

  141. [149]

    M. H. Duong and J. Zimmer, On decompositions of non- reversible processes, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2514, 012007 (2023)

    2023

  142. [150]

    Mizohata, T

    T. Mizohata, T. J. Kobayashi, L.-S. Bouchard, and H. Miyahara, Information geometric bound on general chemical reaction networks, Phys. Rev. E109, 044308 (2024)

    2024

  143. [151]

    F. M. Dannan, P. Neff, and C. Thiel, On the sum of squared logarithms inequality and related inequalities (2015), arXiv:1411.1290 [math.CA]

    2015 arXiv

  144. [152]

    We use an overbar to denote a scaling transformation, avoid- ing confusion with scaled time-integrated physical quantities denoted using a tilde

  145. [153]

    Roldan, I

    E. Roldan, I. Neri, R. Chetrite, S. Gupta, S. Pigolotti, F. Juelicher, and K. Sekimoto, Martingales for physicists: a treatise on stochastic thermodynamics and beyond, Advances in Physics72, 1–258 (2023)

    2023

  146. [154]

    Chetrite and S

    R. Chetrite and S. Gupta, Two refreshing views of fluctuation theorems through kinematics elements and exponential mar- tingale, Journal of Statistical Physics143, 543 (2011)

    2011

  147. [155]

    I. Neri, E. Roldan, and F. Juelicher, Statistics of infima and stopping times of entropy production and applications to ac- tive molecular processes, Phys. Rev. X7, 011019 (2017)

    2017

  148. [156]

    Pigolotti, I

    S. Pigolotti, I. Neri, E. Roldan, and F. Juelicher, Generic prop- erties of stochastic entropy production, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 140604 (2017)

    2017

  149. [157]

    Chetrite, S

    R. Chetrite, S. Gupta, I. Neri, and E. Roldan, Martingale theory for housekeeping heat, Europhysics Letters124, 60006 (2019)

    2019

  150. [158]

    Chun and J

    H.-M. Chun and J. D. Noh, Universal property of the house- keeping entropy production, Phys. Rev. E99, 012136 (2019)

    2019

  151. [159]

    Neri, Universal tradeoff relation between speed, uncer- tainty, and dissipation in nonequilibrium stationary states, SciPost Phys.12, 139 (2022)

    I. Neri, Universal tradeoff relation between speed, uncer- tainty, and dissipation in nonequilibrium stationary states, SciPost Phys.12, 139 (2022)

    2022

  152. [160]

    Raghu and I

    A. Raghu and I. Neri, Effective affinity for generic currents in markov processes, Journal of Statistical Physics192, 50 (2025)

    2025

  153. [161]

    Neri, Martingale approach for first-passage problems of time-additive observables in markov processes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 145002 (2025)

    I. Neri, Martingale approach for first-passage problems of time-additive observables in markov processes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 145002 (2025)

    2025

  154. [162]

    I. A. Martínez, G. Bisker, J. M. Horowitz, and J. M. R. Parrondo, Inferring broken detailed balance in the absence of observable currents, Nature Communications10, 3542 (2019)

    2019

  155. [163]

    D. J. Skinner and J. Dunkel, Estimating entropy production from waiting time distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 198101 (2021)

    2021

  156. [164]

    D. J. Skinner and J. Dunkel, Improved bounds on entropy production in living systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2024300118 (2021)

    2021

  157. [165]

    Nadal-Rosa and G

    A. Nadal-Rosa and G. Manzano, Thermodynamic infer- ence in molecular motors: a martingale approach (2025), arXiv:2503.08818 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Yang and H

    Y.-J. Yang and H. Qian, Unified formalism for entropy produc- tion and fluctuation relations, Phys. Rev. E101, 022129 (2020)

    2020

  159. [167]

    L. Hong, H. Qian, and L. F. Thompson, Representations and divergences in the space of probability measures and stochas- tic thermodynamics, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics376, 112842 (2020)

    2020

  160. [168]

    Qian, Y.-C

    H. Qian, Y.-C. Cheng, and L. F. Thompson, Ternary represen- tation of stochastic change and the origin of entropy and its fluctuations (2019), arXiv:1902.09536 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2019 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Jiang, M

    D.-Q. Jiang, M. Qian, and F.-X. Zhang, Entropy production fluctuations of finite Markov chains, Journal of Mathematical Physics44, 4176 (2003)

    2003

  162. [170]

    I. D. Terlizzi, M. Gironella, D. Herraez-Aguilar, T. Betz, F. Mon- roy, M. Baiesi, and F. Ritort, Variance sum rule for entropy production, Science383, 971 (2024)

    2024

  163. [171]

    Tomita and H

    K. Tomita and H. Tomita, Irreversible Circulation of Fluctua- tion, Progress of Theoretical Physics51, 1731 (1974)

    1974

  164. [172]

    Di Terlizzi, M

    I. Di Terlizzi, M. Baiesi, and F. Ritort, Variance sum rule: proofs and solvable models, New Journal of Physics26, 063013 (2024)

    2024

  165. [173]

    N. Ohga, S. Ito, and A. Kolchinsky, Thermodynamic bound on the asymmetry of cross-correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 19 077101 (2023)

    2023

  166. [174]

    Shiraishi, Entropy production limits all fluctuation oscilla- tions, Phys

    N. Shiraishi, Entropy production limits all fluctuation oscilla- tions, Phys. Rev. E108, L042103 (2023)

    2023

  167. [175]

    Kolchinsky, N

    A. Kolchinsky, N. Ohga, and S. Ito, Thermodynamic bound on spectral perturbations, with applications to oscillations and relaxation dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013082 (2024)

    2024

  168. [176]

    Liang and S

    S. Liang and S. Pigolotti, Thermodynamic bounds on time- reversal asymmetry, Phys. Rev. E108, L062101 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.