Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 62 references

New exact pp-wave solutions in cubic Metric-Affine Gravity show that dynamical torsion and nonmetricity induce a scalar (helicity-0) polarisation mode in the gravitational-wave spectrum.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 23:53 UTC pith:WRN7CEZL

load-bearing objection A solid, transparent exact-solution construction for cubic MAG; the load-bearing coefficient constraints need a consistency check against the ghost-free stability conditions before the advertised-model framing is fully safe. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.03574 v2 pith:WRN7CEZL submitted 2025-11-05 gr-qc hep-th

Gravitational waves in Cubic Metric-Affine Gravity

Sebastian Bahamonde , Jorge Gigante Valcarcel , Jos\'e M. M. Senovilla This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C3583D05 PACS 04.30.-w04.50.Kd
keywords Metric-Affine Gravitypp-wavestorsionnonmetricitygravitational wavesscalar polarisation modeType N algebraic classificationcubic curvature gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs new exact gravitational-wave solutions in a cubic Metric-Affine Gravity theory whose torsion and nonmetricity tensors are dynamical. The solutions are pp-waves whose metric function acquires quadratic corrections from the torsion, Weyl-vector, and traceless-nonmetricity sectors, so the waves are not merely GR waves with extra fields frozen: the extra fields back-react on the metric. The main physical claim is that these post-Riemannian fields produce a genuine scalar (helicity-0) polarisation mode in the gravitational-wave spectrum, alongside the transverse tensor modes of GR. If correct, this gives a concrete observational handle on torsion and nonmetricity, since current limits allow subdominant scalar polarisations. The derivation leans on an algebraic classification of metric-affine geometries to impose Type N conditions on the field strengths, reducing a very complicated system to a tractable set of equations.

Core claim

In the cubic MAG model specified by the action (41) with stability conditions (42)-(47), the authors find exact pp-wave solutions of the Brinkmann form ds^2 = 2dudv - dx^2 - dy^2 - H du^2 in which torsion and nonmetricity are neither zero nor constant: their vector, axial, and tensor modes are dynamical and satisfy Type N algebraic conditions on their field strengths. The metric function is fixed by the single tetrad equation (177) to be H = ˚H + l1 t22^2 + l2 w^2 + l3 λ^2, where ˚H is harmonic on the transverse plane, t22 is an arbitrary torsion function, w is a transverse-harmonic function sourcing the Weyl vector, and λ is a vector mode of the traceless nonmetricity constrained to λ = λ0(

What carries the argument

The central object is the pp-wave metric ansatz with covariantly constant null vector k, together with a consistent set of conditions: Killing equations for torsion and nonmetricity along k, orthogonality of k with all irreducible modes, a recurrence condition on k with respect to the full connection, and Type N algebraic conditions on the field strengths that supply kinetic terms. These conditions collapse the cubic field equations to a handful of PDEs, whose solution is the metric function H written as a sum of squares of the dynamical torsion and nonmetricity functions. The decisive output is the geodesic-deviation equation, in which A0 = -Φ0/4 encodes the scalar mode.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the large set of coefficient constraints imposed ad hoc on the cubic Lagrangian—in particular Eqs. (142), (151)–(166), and b1=b2=b3=0—is compatible with, and lies inside, the ghost-free stability conditions (42)–(47) defining the model.

What would settle it

Relax the conditions b1=b2=b3=0 and check whether the connection field equations (167)–(169) admit solutions with λ depending nonlinearly on x and y: the paper's claim that λ must be of the form λ0(u)+λ1x+λ2y would then be false, and the family (178) would not exhaust the pp-wave solutions. Alternatively, compute the scalar-mode amplitude A0 in the weak-field limit for a coefficient set satisfying both the stability and ad hoc constraints; a predicted amplitude above current interferometer bounds would be ruled out by existing scalar-polarisation searches.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Cubic MAG predicts a scalar (helicity-0) polarisation mode in gravitational waves in addition to the transverse tensor modes of GR, giving a distinctive phenomenological signature.
  • The exact pp-wave solutions extend GR vacuum waves: the metric function is corrected by quadratic contributions from torsion and nonmetricity, so the extra fields genuinely shape the wave profile.
  • The nonlinear interaction between the torsion function t22 and the traceless-nonmetricity vector mode λ prevents both from propagating as plane waves unless one of them vanishes.
  • All curvature, torsion, and nonmetricity invariants vanish for these solutions, mirroring GR pp-waves and making the waves locally hard to distinguish by scalar invariants alone.
  • The scalar-mode amplitude is governed by combinations of the Lagrangian coefficients (l1, l2, l3), so interferometer bounds on scalar polarisations can constrain the cubic MAG parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension: evaluate the scalar-mode amplitude for coefficient sets that simultaneously satisfy the stability conditions and the ad hoc constraints; a predicted amplitude exceeding current bounds would already be ruled out by existing searches.
  • The many ad hoc coefficient relations may severely restrict the viable parameter region; checking their intersection with the ghost-free stability conditions is a natural next step that the paper does not carry out.
  • The plane-wave obstruction suggests that in generic parameter regions the torsion and nonmetricity content may be suppressed at interferometer scales, so models with only one dynamical sector could produce cleaner plane-wave signals.
  • Measuring a subdominant scalar polarisation would not by itself identify cubic MAG; combining its amplitude and frequency dependence with the predicted vanishing of local invariants could help separate this model from other modified-gravity theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs exact pp-wave solutions in a cubic metric-affine gravity (MAG) model with dynamical torsion and nonmetricity. After imposing a Brinkmann pp-wave metric, the authors require the field strengths that provide kinetic terms for the vector, axial, and tensor modes to satisfy Type N algebraic conditions, impose orthogonality between the wave vector and the torsion/nonmetricity modes, and assume a recurrence property of the wave vector. Using stability conditions from previous work (Eqs. (42)–(47)) and a large number of additional coefficient constraints introduced in Sections IV.B–IV.C, the field equations are reduced to a small set of differential equations. The authors present explicit solutions in Riemann-Cartan, Weyl-Cartan, and general metric-affine geometries in which the pp-wave profile H contains quadratic contributions from a torsion function t22, a Weyl potential w, and a nonmetricity vector λ. They compute the geodesic deviation amplitudes and identify a scalar (helicity-0) polarisation sourced by these fields. Plane-wave limits are discussed, and the algebraic classification of the non-trivial field strengths is provided.

Significance. Exact gravitational wave solutions with propagating torsion and nonmetricity in a cubic MAG model are new and extend the existing quadratic-MAG pp-wave literature. If the solutions are correct, they provide a concrete, fully non-linear setting in which torsion and nonmetricity contribute to the metric and generate a scalar polarisation mode, which is a falsifiable signature for beyond-GR gravity. The paper also demonstrates a systematic method for applying the algebraic classification of metric-affine geometries to solve field equations. However, the central claims currently rest on two unverified pillars: compatibility of the many coefficient constraints with the stability conditions, and the correctness of the very long algebra. These need to be established before the solutions can be accepted as solutions of the advertised theory.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV.C, Eqs. (142), (151)–(166), (174)–(176)] The coefficient constraints (142), (151)–(166), and (174)–(176) are imposed to eliminate interaction terms and are therefore load-bearing for the reduced field equations (143), (148), (167)–(177). The paper does not demonstrate that these constraints are compatible with the ghost-free stability conditions (42)–(47), nor that they leave a non-empty parameter region in which the kinetic coefficients d1+4h25, d1+4a2+8a14−2a6, and 2a2+a6 are non-zero. If the constrained subspace were empty or forced any of these coefficients to vanish, the solutions and the scalar-mode conclusion would degenerate. Please provide an explicit consistency check of the combined system and a representative example parameter set.
  2. [§IV.A–C, Eqs. (133), (149), (178), (183)–(194)] The paper states that the field equations reduce to the displayed equations and gives the general solutions, but it does not report a substitution of the final expressions into the full tetrad and connection field equations (B2)–(B7). Given the extreme length of these equations, an algebraic error in the reduction or in the final expressions cannot be excluded by inspection. The authors should either include a machine-checkable verification (e.g., an xAct/Maple notebook as ancillary material) or describe the verification procedure explicitly, so that the claim that these are exact solutions is reproducible.
  3. [§IV.C, Eqs. (167)–(173)] The integration leading to λ(u,x,y)=λ0(u)+λ1 x+λ2 y (Eq. (173)) is justified only if the coefficient (2a2+a6) is non-zero; if 2a2+a6=0, Eqs. (167)–(169) impose no restriction on λ after b1=b2=b3=0, and the subsequent solution branch is different. The paper does not state this non-degeneracy assumption or analyze the degenerate branch. Since the scalar polarisation coefficient in Eq. (182) is l3 = (3/8)(2a2+a6), the central phenomenological claim requires this coefficient to be non-zero. Please state the necessary inequalities explicitly and treat the vanishing cases, or argue that they are excluded by the stability conditions.
  4. [§IV.C, Eqs. (244)–(245)] The plane-wave limits require either λ=0 or t22=0, and the text attributes this to a nonlinear interaction preventing simultaneous plane-wave propagation. It is not clear whether this is an additional imposed restriction or a consequence of the field equations; if imposed, the statement should be qualified. Also, the abstract's claim that torsion and nonmetricity 'induce a scalar polarisation mode' should be reconciled with the fact that in the exact plane-wave limits one of the source fields is switched off, although the scalar mode can still arise from the remaining sources (w and t22 or λ). Please clarify the status of the scalar mode in the plane-wave specialisation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§IV.A, Eqs. (106)–(111)] The paper solves only the α=0 branch of the recurrence condition, while the α≠0 branch (Eqs. (106)–(111)) is not analyzed. A brief comment on why this branch is not of interest (or a proof of no-go) would make the treatment of the parameter space complete.
  2. [§IV, footnote 1] The phrase 'For simplicity in the calculations, we assume vanishing mass terms' should be discussed in the conclusions; setting mass terms to zero is a non-trivial restriction of the model and could affect the stability-based motivation.
  3. [after Eq. (174)] The sentence 'as well as the last set of Lagrangian coefficients to vanish b1,b2,b3' is ungrammatical; 'to vanish' should be set off by commas.
  4. [Eq. (75)] 'for Type N torsion and nonmetricity tensors' should be clarified to mean imposing Type N conditions on the tensors T and Q themselves, as opposed to the field strengths used in Eqs. (66)–(74).
  5. [General] Given the length of the paper, a summary table listing the solution functions, the parameter constraints, and the non-degeneracy conditions for the three geometries would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the solutions are obtained by explicit integration of the field equations under transparently stated ansätze.

full rationale

The paper is a constructive exact-solution analysis. It imposes, as stated assumptions, a pp-wave Brinkmann metric (53), Killing/orthogonality/recurrence constraints on torsion and nonmetricity, and Type N conditions on the relevant field strengths (66)-(74). These are ansätze, not disguised conclusions. The central metric solution (178), H = H0 + l1 t22^2 + l2 w^2 + l3 lambda^2, is obtained by direct integration of the tetrad field equation (177), with the constants l_i fixed by (180)-(182); it is not inserted as an ansatz and no component of (177) is assumed equal to (178). The claimed scalar polarization follows from the standard geodesic-deviation formulas (247)-(251) applied to the already-solved Phi0, so A0 is a derived consequence of the field equations rather than an input fitted to produce a scalar mode. The many coefficient restrictions, e.g. (142), (151)-(166) and (174)-(176), are explicitly imposed simplifications that remove interaction terms and make the field equations tractable; they are parameter choices and not circular fits. The self-citations [32,33,47,48] supply stability conditions and algebraic classifications used to formulate Type N conditions, but those are external, parameter-free frameworks whose assumptions do not include the present solutions, and the paper does not invoke any uniqueness theorem to force its result. Thus no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input, and no circularity can be exhibited from the paper's equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 9 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on a heavily constrained parameter subspace of an already-restricted cubic MAG model, plus a set of geometric ansaetze. The free parameters are Lagrangian coefficients and recurrence constants chosen by hand, not fitted to data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Cubic Lagrangian coefficient constraints (h137, h162, h42, h43, h45, h92, h96, h123, h132, h135, h174, h185, h187, h188, = specific linear combinations of other coefficients (Eqs. 142, 151-166, 174-176)
    Set by hand to make interaction terms vanish so the reduced field equations admit the presented solutions; not derived from first principles.
  • Recurrence constants alpha, beta, gamma = beta=-1/2 (Weyl-Cartan), gamma=-1/8 (general metric-affine), alpha branch 0 or alpha != 0
    Chosen to satisfy the recurrence condition (78) and to simplify branches; they are free parameters of the ansatz.
  • Proportionality constant N2 = 0
    Assumed zero for simplicity in footnote 2; restricts the RN-like black-hole compatibility parameter space.
  • Mass terms for torsion/nonmetricity = 0
    Assumed vanishing (footnote 1) for simplicity; mass terms would change the field equations.
axioms (9)
  • standard math Metric-affine geometry definitions: torsion, nonmetricity, curvature, irreducible decompositions (Sec. II).
    Standard differential-geometry background used to define the action and field strengths.
  • domain assumption Cubic MAG action (41) with stability conditions (42)-(47).
    The action and ghost-free coefficient constraints come from prior work [32,33]; not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The cubic MAG model is ghost-free in vector and axial sectors.
    Cited from Refs. [32,33]; the present paper relies on this for the model's physical viability.
  • domain assumption pp-wave metric ansatz in Brinkmann coordinates (53) with null Killing vector satisfying nabla k = 0.
    Standard pp-wave ansatz in GR; extended to MAG.
  • ad hoc to paper Killing equations on torsion and nonmetricity: L_k T = L_k Q = 0 (79).
    Imposed to reduce the number of independent functions; not required by the theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Orthogonality conditions between wave null vector and torsion/nonmetricity modes (76)-(77).
    Imposed as part of the wave profile; restricts the solution space.
  • ad hoc to paper Recurrence condition on the wave null vector (78).
    Imposed to make the wave vector a preferred null direction with full connection.
  • ad hoc to paper Type N algebraic conditions on field strengths (66)-(74).
    Imposed by analogy with GR pp-waves; the authors explicitly exclude Type N torsion/nonmetricity themselves.
  • ad hoc to paper Reissner-Nordstrom-like compatibility with N2=0 and vanishing mass terms.
    Simplifies the parameter space; stated in footnotes 1 and 2.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 74895 in / 13956 out tokens · 124637 ms · 2026-08-03T23:53:32.306948+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We derive new exact gravitational wave solutions with dynamical torsion and nonmetricity tensors in the framework of cubic Metric-Affine Gravity (MAG). For this purpose, we consider the full algebraic classification of the gravitational field in general metric-affine geometries and impose a set of Type N conditions on the field strength tensors that implement the kinetics of torsion and nonmetricity in a particular cubic MAG model, recently considered to eliminate ghostly instabilities from the vector and axial sectors of the theory. The new solutions represent pp-waves characterised by a metric function that includes the dynamical contributions of the torsion and nonmetricity tensors provided by the field equations of the model. In particular, these quantities induce a scalar polarisation mode in the gravitational-wave spectrum, thus offering a distinctive phenomenological signature beyond the ordinary tensor polarisation modes of General Relativity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects,

    F. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. Kerlick, and J. Nester, “General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects,”Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393–416

    1976

  2. [2]

    Quadratic Poincar´ e Gauge Theory of Gravity: A Comparison With the General Relativity Theory,

    Y. Obukhov, V. Ponomarev, and V. Zhytnikov, “Quadratic Poincar´ e Gauge Theory of Gravity: A Comparison With the General Relativity Theory,”Gen. Rel. Grav.21(1989) 1107–1142

    1989

  3. [3]

    Metric-Affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, “Metric-Affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,”Phys. Rept.258(1995) 1–171, arXiv:gr-qc/9402012 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    On the gauge aspects of gravity,

    F. Gronwald and F. W. Hehl, “On the gauge aspects of gravity,” inInternational School of Cosmology and Gravitation: 14th Course: Quantum Gravity, pp. 148–198. 5, 1995.arXiv:gr-qc/9602013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Blagojevi´ c and F

    M. Blagojevi´ c and F. W. Hehl, eds.,Gauge Theories of Gravitation: A Reader with Commentaries. World Scientific, Singapore, 2013

    2013

  6. [6]

    V. N. Ponomarev, A. O. Barvinsky, and Yu. N. Obukhov,Gauge Approach and Quantization Methods in Gravity Theory. Nauka, Moscow, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Fundamental Symmetries and Spacetime Geometries in Gauge Theories of Gravity: Prospects for Unified Field Theories,

    F. Cabral, F. S. Lobo, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, “Fundamental Symmetries and Spacetime Geometries in Gauge Theories of Gravity: Prospects for Unified Field Theories,”Universe6(2020) no. 12, 238,arXiv:2012.06356 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Poincar´ e gauge gravity primer,

    Y. N. Obukhov, “Poincar´ e gauge gravity primer,” inModified and Quantum Gravity: From Theory to Experimental Searches on All Scales, pp. 105–143. Springer, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Gravity Lagrangian with ghost-free curvature-squared terms,

    D. E. Neville, “Gravity Lagrangian with ghost-free curvature-squared terms,”Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 3535

    1978

  10. [10]

    New ghost-free gravity Lagrangians with propagating torsion,

    E. Sezgin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “New ghost-free gravity Lagrangians with propagating torsion,”Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 3269

    1980

  11. [11]

    Class of ghost-free gravity Lagrangians with massive or massless propagating torsion,

    E. Sezgin, “Class of ghost-free gravity Lagrangians with massive or massless propagating torsion,”Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 1677–1680

    1981

  12. [12]

    Linear approximation for the massless Lorentz gauge field,

    S. Miyamoto, T. Nakano, T. Ohtani, and Y. Tamura, “Linear approximation for the massless Lorentz gauge field,”Prog. Theor. Phys.69(1983) 1236–1240. 42

    1983

  13. [13]

    Massless torsion fields. II. The caseα+ 2a/3 = 0,

    M. Fukui and J. Masukawa, “Massless torsion fields. II. The caseα+ 2a/3 = 0,”Prog. Theor. Phys.73(1985) 75

    1985

  14. [14]

    Massless Lorentz gauge field consistent with Einstein’s gravitation theory. The caseα+ 3a/2 =β−2a/3 =γ+ 3a/2 = 0,

    K. Fukuma, S. Miyamoto, T. Nakano, T. Ohtani, and Y. Tamura, “Massless Lorentz gauge field consistent with Einstein’s gravitation theory. The caseα+ 3a/2 =β−2a/3 =γ+ 3a/2 = 0,”Prog. Theor. Phys.73(1985) 874

    1985

  15. [15]

    Zero-mass normal modes in linearized Poincar´ e gauge theories,

    R. Battiti and M. Toller, “Zero-mass normal modes in linearized Poincar´ e gauge theories,”Lett. Nuovo Cim.44(1985) 35

    1985

  16. [16]

    Propagating Modes in Gauge Field Theories of Gravity,

    R. Kuhfuss and J. Nitsch, “Propagating Modes in Gauge Field Theories of Gravity,”Gen. Rel. Grav.18(1986) 1207

    1986

  17. [17]

    Extra gauge symmetries in a weak-field approximation of anR+T 2 +R 2 theory of gravity,

    M. Blagojevi´ c and M. Vasili´ c, “Extra gauge symmetries in a weak-field approximation of anR+T 2 +R 2 theory of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 3748

    1987

  18. [18]

    Ghost and tachyon free gauge invariant, Poincar´ e, affine and projective Lagrangians,

    P. Baikov, M. Hayashi, N. Nelipa, and S. Ostapchenko, “Ghost and tachyon free gauge invariant, Poincar´ e, affine and projective Lagrangians,”Gen. Rel. Grav.24(1992) 867–880

    1992

  19. [19]

    Hamiltonian analysis of Poincar´ e gauge theory scalar modes,

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, “Hamiltonian analysis of Poincar´ e gauge theory scalar modes,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D8(1999) 459–479,arXiv:gr-qc/9902032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  20. [20]

    Hamiltonian analysis of Poincar´ e gauge theory: higher spin modes,

    H.-J. Yo and J. M. Nester, “Hamiltonian analysis of Poincar´ e gauge theory: higher spin modes,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11 (2002) 747–780,arXiv:gr-qc/0112030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  21. [21]

    Ghost and tachyon free Poincar´ e gauge theories: A systematic approach,

    Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, “Ghost and tachyon free Poincar´ e gauge theories: A systematic approach,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no. 6, 064001,arXiv:1812.02675 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Ghosts in metric-affine higher order curvature gravity,

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez and A. Delhom, “Ghosts in metric-affine higher order curvature gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) no. 8, 656,arXiv:1901.08988 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Revisiting the stability of quadratic Poincar´ e gauge gravity,

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez and F. J. Maldonado Torralba, “Revisiting the stability of quadratic Poincar´ e gauge gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) no. 7, 611,arXiv:1910.07506 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    New class of ghost- and tachyon-free metric affine gravities,

    R. Percacci and E. Sezgin, “New class of ghost- and tachyon-free metric affine gravities,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no. 8, 084040,arXiv:1912.01023 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Instabilities in metric-affine theories of gravity with higher order curvature terms,

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez and A. Delhom, “Instabilities in metric-affine theories of gravity with higher order curvature terms,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) no. 6, 585,arXiv:2004.11357 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Ghost and tachyon free Weyl gauge theories: A systematic approach,

    Y.-C. Lin, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, “Ghost and tachyon free Weyl gauge theories: A systematic approach,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no. 2, 024034,arXiv:2005.02228 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Radiatively stable ghost and tachyon freedom in metric affine gravity,

    C. Marzo, “Radiatively stable ghost and tachyon freedom in metric affine gravity,”Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no. 2, 024045,arXiv:2110.14788 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Metric-Affine Gravity as an effective field theory,

    A. Baldazzi, O. Melichev, and R. Percacci, “Metric-Affine Gravity as an effective field theory,”Annals Phys.438(2022) 168757,arXiv:2112.10193 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Vector stability in quadratic metric-affine theories,

    A. Jim´ enez-Cano and F. J. Maldonado Torralba, “Vector stability in quadratic metric-affine theories,”JCAP09(2022) 044,arXiv:2205.05674 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Consistent particle physics in metric-affine gravity from extended projective symmetry,

    W. Barker and S. Zell, “Consistent particle physics in metric-affine gravity from extended projective symmetry,” arXiv:2402.14917 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Can MAG be a predictive EFT? Radiative stability and ghost resurgence in massive vector models,

    C. Marzo, “Can MAG be a predictive EFT? Radiative stability and ghost resurgence in massive vector models,”Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no. 9, 095007,arXiv:2403.15003 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Stability of Poincar´ e gauge theory with cubic order invariants,

    S. Bahamonde and J. Gigante Valcarcel, “Stability of Poincar´ e gauge theory with cubic order invariants,”Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) no. 10, 104075,arXiv:2402.08937 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Stability in cubic metric-affine gravity,

    S. Bahamonde and J. Gigante Valcarcel, “Stability in cubic metric-affine gravity,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 8, 084058,arXiv:2411.12954 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Plane waves in gauge theories of gravitation,

    W. Adamowicz, “Plane waves in gauge theories of gravitation,”General Relativity and Gravitation12(1980) no. 9, 677–691

    1980

  35. [35]

    Plane torsion waves in quadratic gravitational theories,

    O. V. Babourova, B. N. Frolov, and E. A. Klimova, “Plane torsion waves in quadratic gravitational theories,”Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 1149–1162,arXiv:gr-qc/9805005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Plane fronted waves in metric-affine gravity,

    A. Garc ´ ıa, A. Mac ´ ıas, D. Puetzfeld, and J. Socorro, “Plane fronted waves in metric-affine gravity,”Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 044021,arXiv:gr-qc/0005038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    Plane waves in metric-affine gravity,

    Y. N. Obukhov, “Plane waves in metric-affine gravity,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 024025,arXiv:gr-qc/0601074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Generalized pp waves in Poincar´ e gauge theory,

    M. Blagojevi´ c and B. Cvetkovi´ c, “Generalized pp waves in Poincar´ e gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 10, 104018,arXiv:1702.04367 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Gravitational waves in Poincar´ e gauge gravity theory,

    Y. N. Obukhov, “Gravitational waves in Poincar´ e gauge gravity theory,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 8, 084028, arXiv:1702.05185 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Generalized plane waves in Poincar´ e gauge theory of gravity,

    M. Blagojevi´ c, B. Cvetkovi´ c, and Y. N. Obukhov, “Generalized plane waves in Poincar´ e gauge theory of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no. 6, 064031,arXiv:1708.08766 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Gravitational waves in metric-affine gravity theory,

    A. Jim´ enez-Cano and Y. N. Obukhov, “Gravitational waves in metric-affine gravity theory,”Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no. 2, 024018,arXiv:2010.14528 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Review of gravitational wave solutions in quadratic metric-affine gravity,

    A. Jim´ enez-Cano, “Review of gravitational wave solutions in quadratic metric-affine gravity,” in2022 Snowmass Summer Study. 3, 2022.arXiv:2203.03936 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    On Gravitational waves,

    A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “On Gravitational waves,”J. Franklin Inst.223(1937) 43–54

    1937

  44. [44]

    Misner, K

    C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler,Gravitation. No. pt. 3 in Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, 1973. https://books.google.com.mt/books?id=w4Gigq3tY1kC

    1973

  45. [45]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact solutions of Einstein ’s field equations. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003

    2003

  46. [46]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsk´ y,Exact Space-Times in Einstein ’s General Relativity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. 43

    2009

  47. [47]

    Algebraic classification of the gravitational field in Weyl-Cartan spacetimes,

    S. Bahamonde and J. Gigante Valcarcel, “Algebraic classification of the gravitational field in Weyl-Cartan spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no. 4, 044037,arXiv:2305.05501 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Algebraic classification of the gravitational field in general metric-affine geometries,

    S. Bahamonde, J. Gigante Valcarcel, and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Algebraic classification of the gravitational field in general metric-affine geometries,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no. 12, 124053,arXiv:2409.07153 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Irreducible decompositions of non-metricity, torsion, curvature and Bianchi identities in metric-affine spacetimes,

    J. D. McCrea, “Irreducible decompositions of non-metricity, torsion, curvature and Bianchi identities in metric-affine spacetimes,”Class. Quant. Grav.9(1992) 553–568

    1992

  50. [50]

    Einstein spaces which are mapped conformally on each other,

    H. W. Brinkmann, “Einstein spaces which are mapped conformally on each other,”Math. Ann.94(1925) 119–145

    1925

  51. [51]

    Structure of second-order symmetric Lorentzian manifolds,

    O. F. Blanco, M. S´ anchez, and J. M. M. Senovilla, “Structure of second-order symmetric Lorentzian manifolds,”Journal of the European Mathematical Society (EMS Publishing)15(2013) no. 2,

    2013

  52. [52]

    All space-times with vanishing curvature invariants,

    V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, A. Coley, and R. Milson, “All space-times with vanishing curvature invariants,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 6213–6236,arXiv:gr-qc/0209024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  53. [53]

    On the physical significance of the Riemann tensor,

    F. A. E. Pirani, “On the physical significance of the Riemann tensor,”Acta Phys. Polon.15(1956) 389–405

    1956

  54. [54]

    Invariant formulation of gravitational radiation theory,

    F. A. E. Pirani, “Invariant formulation of gravitational radiation theory,”Phys. Rev.105(1957) 1089–1099

    1957

  55. [55]

    The gravitational compass,

    P. Szekeres, “The gravitational compass,”J. Math. Phys.6(1965) 1387–1391

    1965

  56. [56]

    Gravitational waves in vacuum space-times with cosmological constant. 2. Deviation of geodesics and interpretation of nontwisting type N solutions,

    J. Biˇ c´ ak and J. Podolsk´ y, “Gravitational waves in vacuum space-times with cosmological constant. 2. Deviation of geodesics and interpretation of nontwisting type N solutions,”J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 4506–4517, arXiv:gr-qc/9907049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    Interpreting spacetimes of any dimension using geodesic deviation,

    J. Podolsk´ y and R.ˇSvarc, “Interpreting spacetimes of any dimension using geodesic deviation,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 044057,arXiv:1201.4790 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    Geodesic deviation in pp-wave spacetimes of quadratic curvature gravity,

    E. C. de Rey Neto, “Geodesic deviation in pp-wave spacetimes of quadratic curvature gravity,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 124013,arXiv:gr-qc/0309128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence,

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), “GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no. 14, 141101, arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no. 16, 161101,arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), “Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) no. 1, 011102,arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Search for scalar-tensor mixed polarization modes of gravitational waves,

    H. Takeda, S. Morisaki, and A. Nishizawa, “Search for scalar-tensor mixed polarization modes of gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no. 8, 084019,arXiv:2105.00253 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022