Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 67 references

This paper derives a bulk dual for the work distribution of a two-point measurement in a holographic CFT, turning the Tasaki-Crooks fluctuation theorem into a gravitational statement that is verified in an explicit AdS3 example.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:28 UTC pith:F2NL5MVJ

load-bearing objection A clean and useful holographic translation of the Tasaki–Crooks theorem with an explicit BTZ example; the gaps are verification details, not fatal flaws. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.10305 v2 pith:F2NL5MVJ submitted 2025-11-13 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qcquant-ph

Work distribution and fluctuation theorem in AdS/CFT

Daichi Takeda This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qcquant-ph PACS 04.60.-m05.70.Ln11.25.Tq
keywords AdS/CFTTasaki-Crooks fluctuation theoremwork distributiontwo-point measurementSchwinger-Keldysh path integralBrown-York energyreal-time gauge/gravity dualityBTZ black hole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that the work distribution p(W) defined by a two-point measurement on the boundary of a holographic CFT has a well-defined bulk counterpart: a gravitational Schwinger-Keldysh path integral over a spacetime M built from Lorentzian and Euclidean segments. Using the real-time gauge/gravity dictionary, the characteristic function G(u) is written as e^{iS[Φ;M]}/Z(0), and the Tasaki-Crooks relation follows as a bulk statement. The paper verifies this explicitly for a free scalar in AdS3 with a BTZ black hole, computing p(W) to second order in the source and confirming the fluctuation theorem. It also shows that the first moment of p(W) matches the change in Brown-York energy from the bulk initial-value problem, indicating that the distribution encodes real-time gravitational dynamics. This matters because it offers a holographic route to gravitational fluctuation theorems without presupposing a complete theory of quantum gravity.

Core claim

The central claim is that the characteristic function G(u) for the two-point-measurement work distribution equals e^{iS[Φ;M]}/Z(0), where M is the piecewise Lorentzian-Euclidean spacetime whose boundary follows the closed-time contour, and S is the bulk action evaluated on the classical saddle. The paper constructs M explicitly by gluing a forward Lorentzian segment, a backward Lorentzian segment, and a Euclidean segment with junction conditions that enforce 'smoothness' in the sense of the real-time gauge/gravity dictionary. In the example of a free scalar in AdS3 with a BTZ background, the solution on M is given in closed form, the action is evaluated to O(λ^2), and the resulting p(W) is c

What carries the argument

The gravitational Schwinger-Keldysh spacetime M (and its time-reversed partner M̃), which is a bulk manifold with two Lorentzian segments (forward and backward in boundary time) joined to a Euclidean segment by junction surfaces, with boundary sources specifying the CFT deformation. The 'smoothness' junction conditions on the fields—∂_tΦ_f = ∂_tΦ_b at t_f=t_b=u+v, ∂_tΦ_b = i∂_τΦ_e at t_b=0, τ=0, and ∂_tΦ_f = i∂_τΦ_e at t_f=0, τ=β—are what enforce continuity of the closed-time contour and are the mechanism that gives G(u) its β dependence. The real-time gauge/gravity dictionary supplies the rule that backward segments contribute with a minus sign and Euclidean segments with a factor of i, whi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 'smoothness' junction conditions gluing the forward, backward, and Euclidean bulk segments faithfully represent the boundary two-point-measurement contour and that the classical saddle dominates the path integral, so that G(u) = e^{iS[Φ;M]}/Z(0) is the true boundary characteristic function.

What would settle it

Compute the boundary two-point-measurement work distribution p(W) to order λ^2 in a free scalar CFT (or via the interferometric protocol cited in the paper) and compare it with the bulk formula (21). The bulk expression predicts a specific dependence on β, the horizon radius r_+, and the thermal factor n_ω; any mismatch in these functional forms would show that the Schwinger-Keldysh spacetime M does not encode the boundary work statistics.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Tasaki-Crooks relation holds in the bulk: for the explicit AdS3 model, the forward and reverse work distributions are equal, so the fluctuation theorem (11) is satisfied with ΔF=0 for the cyclic protocol.
  • The mean work computed from the holographic work distribution agrees with the change in Brown-York energy of the bulk initial-value problem, so p(W) captures real-time gravitational dynamics and not just a formal boundary definition.
  • All moments of the work distribution are in principle computable from bulk saddle points, offering a way to access nonequilibrium properties of strongly coupled systems without solving quantum gravity.
  • The dictionary should extend straightforwardly to multi-trace deformations, operators with spin or charge, and higher orders in the source, where the theorem must continue to hold.
  • The bulk formulation provides a gravitational realization of a fluctuation theorem, suggesting that the second law of black hole thermodynamics may be derived from a more detailed fluctuation relation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By interpreting the junction conditions as the bulk avatars of the two projective measurements, one may reconstruct the off-shell quantum processes that 'unravel' the classical bulk trajectory; this is a natural route to a bulk TPM definition and to computing higher moments via quantum corrections to the saddle.
  • The agreement between ⟨W⟩ and the Brown-York change is checked at second order in the source; a natural extension would be to compute the second moment and compare it with a bulk calculation of energy fluctuations, which would test whether the distribution captures more than the mean.
  • The construction suggests a direct bulk derivation of the Jarzynski equality: since the characteristic function is an exponential of the action, the free-energy difference is encoded in the Euclidean segment, and the average of e^{-βW} should be computable from pure saddle data.
  • One testable prediction is that the β-dependence of the work distribution at finite momentum k encodes the thermal occupation factors n_ω = 1/(e^{βω}-1) visible in (30); an independent boundary computation via an interferometric protocol could look for this signature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives a bulk (AdS/CFT) dual of the work distribution p(W) defined by the two-point measurement (TPM) protocol on the boundary, and recasts the Tasaki–Crooks (TC) fluctuation theorem in bulk language. The main technical claim is that the characteristic function G(u) of p(W) is given by a gravitational Schwinger–Keldysh path integral (Eq. 17), using the Skenderis–van Rees real-time holographic prescription. The authors then compute G(u) explicitly to O(λ²) for a free scalar field on a BTZ black hole in AdS₃/CFT₂, Fourier-transform to obtain p(W) (Eq. 21), verify the detailed-balance form of TC, and argue that ⟨W⟩ agrees with the change in Brown–York energy obtained from the bulk initial-value problem. The central derivation is a translation of a known boundary identity through an established holographic dictionary, with the example serving as a consistency check.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a concrete holographic realization of quantum work statistics and fluctuation theorems, connecting TC to real-time bulk dynamics. The main strengths are the use of a well-established real-time dictionary, the explicit and internally consistent O(λ²) example, and the verification of normalization and TC in that example. The paper is honest about what remains speculative, in particular the off-shell quantum-gravity interpretation of the TPM. The result would be a useful step toward formulating fluctuation theorems in quantum gravity, although the present work stops short of identifying the precise bulk process that p(W) constrains.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2 (after Eq. 16)] The passage 'Strictly speaking, in quantum field theories, we have to circumvent the TPM to define p(W), and a way is proposed in [46] ... The formal expressions in this section are not modified' is too terse for a load-bearing point. The TPM characteristic function (8) is defined by projective measurements onto eigenstates of the full interacting CFT Hamiltonian, which are not well-defined in the continuum. Reference [46] defines work distributions for quantum fields, but the paper does not state whether that construction applies to a holographic CFT with single-trace deformations of the form (16), whether the initial state is the exact Gibbs state, or whether the resulting characteristic function reduces to (8). Without this justification, the bulk computation computes a boundary generating function, but calling it the TPM work distribution is not fully supported. Please specify the as
  2. [Section 'An example: scalar field' and End Matter] The claim that ⟨W⟩ computed from p(W) agrees with the Brown–York energy change obtained from the bulk initial-value problem is asserted rather than demonstrated: 'We find that the values agree; because a spatially homogeneous source entails a trivial volume divergence, we compare energy densities.' This agreement is offered as evidence that p(W) actually encodes bulk real-time dynamics, which is central to the paper's interpretive claim. The calculation should be shown, or at least a precise equation-by-equation mapping to Eq. (4.15) of [38] should be provided. As written, the reader cannot verify the identification.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (21)] The probability density p(W) is expressed in terms of q, which is itself defined as the integral of p(W) over W≠0. This is a self-consistent normalization condition, but it is not an explicit closed form. It would be clearer to write q = ∫_{W≠0} dW [second term of (21)] or state that q is fixed by normalization to O(λ²).
  2. [Eq. (24)] The integrand is said to be positive, reflecting (15). Positivity relies on the evenness of |λ_{ω,k} Γ(γ_{ω,k})Γ(γ_{ω,-k})|² under (ω,k)→(−ω,−k). This follows if λ is real and the boundary is noncompact; please state this explicitly.
  3. [End Matter, junction conditions] The junction conditions are stated as ∂_tΦ_f = ∂_tΦ_b at t_f = t_b = u+v, etc. It would help to specify which sign convention is used for the Lorentzian action on the backward segment, since the stationarity condition iS_f − iS_b − S_e is only quoted. A one-line derivation or a precise reference to equations in [39,40] would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the bulk work distribution is a standard real-time AdS/CFT translation, TC is verified by explicit calculation, and the [38] agreement is a non-load-bearing consistency check.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) define the boundary characteristic function G(u) in Eq. (8) via the TPM; (ii) translate it to a bulk Schwinger-Keldysh on-shell action using the Skenderis-van Rees real-time dictionary [39,40], giving Eq. (17); (iii) compute p(W) from G(u) in the free-scalar BTZ example, Eq. (21) from Eq. (30); (iv) verify TC by computation. No step reduces to its own input by construction. Eq. (17) is an application of the established real-time gauge/gravity duality, not an ansatz chosen to reproduce TC. The normalization of Eq. (17) is fixed by the boundary condition G=1 for constant source, which follows from the boundary definition (8) and is not a fitted prediction. The example is a genuine calculation: the junction conditions are imported from [39,40] and the resulting on-shell action is nontrivial. The Tasaki–Crooks check p~(W)=p(W) with Z(0)=Z(v) is verified against the explicit form of p(W), not assumed. The agreement of ⟨W⟩ with Eq. (4.15) of [38] is a consistency check supporting the gravitational-dynamics interpretation; although [38] shares an author, the current paper does not rely on that citation to derive its central result. If the comparison were absent, the bulk TC and p(W) computation would still stand. The only caveats are non-circular: the QFT TPM definition is deferred to [46] with 'the formal expressions are not modified', and the [38] agreement is asserted rather than shown line-by-line. These are conditions for full acceptance, not demonstrations of circularity. No fitted parameters are called predictions, and no uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the holographic dictionary and the Skenderis-van Rees real-time prescription rather than on fitted numbers; the ledger shows zero free parameters, six domain assumptions drawn from cited literature, and one speculative non-committal entity.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary: bulk path integrals on a spacetime M with boundary sources equal boundary CFT correlation functions, including real-time (Schwinger-Keldysh) contours.
    The entire bulk translation (Eq. 17, Section 'The bulk expression of TC') rests on this; cited to [31-33, 39-41] but assumed without independent verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption Large-N saddle-point approximation: the bulk SK path integral is dominated by the classical solution Φ with given boundary conditions.
    Stated in 'The bulk expression of TC' ('in the large-N limit, we can use the prescription of [39,40,49]'); semiclassical corrections deferred.
  • domain assumption Skenderis-van Rees gluing ('smoothness') conditions across forward/backward/Euclidean segments, including Eq. (29) relying on the ingoing-mode causality of f_{ω,k}.
    End Matter; conditions are stated as 'required from the stationarity of the total action iS_f − iS_b − S_e'. The O(λ²) solution (26)-(28) depends on them.
  • domain assumption Time-reversal invariance of the CFT: Θ (with P and/or C if needed) leaves I_CFT invariant, so the reverse process is dual to the time-reversed bulk contour.
    Section 'Tasaki-Crooks fluctuation theorem' sets up the reverse process; the example assumes p̃=p from this symmetry.
  • domain assumption TPM work distribution has a legitimate QFT definition that reduces to the formal TPM expressions [46].
    Section 2: 'Strictly speaking, in quantum field theories, we have to circumvent the TPM to define p(W), and a way is proposed in [46]… The formal expressions in this section are not modified.'
  • domain assumption BTZ is the dominant Euclidean saddle of the thermal state Z(0).
    Example section: 'we suppose the BTZ black hole to realize the dominant saddle of Z(0)'.
invented entities (1)
  • Off-shell Brown-York energy (speculative notion of what p(W) measures in quantum gravity) no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed interpretation of p(W) as the distribution of a fluctuating bulk energy in quantum gravity
    Mentioned in 'What gravitational dynamics does p(W) describe?' as the hoped-for interpretation; the paper explicitly does not pursue it ('We do not pursue further exploration of this bulk quantum process in this Letter') and gives no falsifiable handle.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10738 in / 28126 out tokens · 261176 ms · 2026-08-03T22:28:45.471289+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

From the AdS/CFT dictionary, we derive a bulk dual of the work distribution defined by the two-point measurement on the boundary, yielding a bulk formulation of the Tasaki-Crooks fluctuation theorem. We argue that this does not merely supply a holographic prescription for the work distribution; it encodes the mean energy change and fluctuations of bulk real-time dynamics associated with the two-point measurement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10305 by Daichi Takeda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The closed time contours [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking. The four laws of black hole mechanics.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 31(2):161–170, 1973

    1973

  2. [2]

    gravitational FT

    coupled to a sourceλwithλ(0) =λ(v) = 0 (i.e., Z(0) =Z(v)), and we carry out the perturbative expan- sion toO(λ 2). On the bulk side, we suppose the BTZ black hole to realize the dominant saddle ofZ(0). The bulk dual ofOis a real scalar field Φ, and a free theory suffices toO(λ 2): S=− 1 2 Z d3x√−g gµν∂µΦ∂νΦ +m 2Φ2 +S ct,(19) gµνdxµdxν =−(r 2 −r 2 +)dt2 + ...

  3. [3]

    Robert M. Wald. Black hole entropy is the Noether charge.Phys. Rev. D, 48(8):R3427–R3431, 1993.arXiv: gr-qc/9307038,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3427

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking and J. B. Hartle. Energy and angular momentum flow into a black hole.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 27(4):283–290, 1972

    1972

  5. [5]

    S. W. Hawking. Black holes in general relativity.Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, 25(2):152–166, 1972

    1972

  6. [6]

    J. D. Bekenstein. Black holes and the second law.Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 4(15):737–740, 1972

    1971

  7. [7]

    Bekenstein

    Jacob D. Bekenstein. Generalized second law of thermo- dynamics in black-hole physics.Phys. Rev. D, 9:3292– 3300, Jun 1974. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3292,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9. 3292

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3292 1974

  8. [8]

    Bekenstein

    Jacob D. Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy.Phys. Rev. D, 7:2333–2346, 1973.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973

  9. [9]

    S. Carlip. Black Hole Thermodynamics.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 23:1430023, 2014.arXiv:1410.1486,doi:10. 1142/S0218271814300237

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Aron C. Wall. Ten Proofs of the Generalized Second Law.JHEP, 06:021, 2009.arXiv:0901.3865,doi:10. 1088/1126-6708/2009/06/021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Black Hole Thermodynamics: General Relativity and Beyond.Gen

    Sudipta Sarkar. Black Hole Thermodynamics: General Relativity and Beyond.Gen. Rel. Grav., 51(5):63, 2019. arXiv:1905.04466,doi:10.1007/s10714-019-2545-y

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Aron C. Wall. A Survey of Black Hole Thermodynamics. 4 2018.arXiv:1804.10610

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state.Phys

    Ted Jacobson. Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state.Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:1260– 1263, 1995.arXiv:gr-qc/9504004,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.75.1260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    Microscopic ori- gin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.Phys

    Andrew Strominger and Cumrun Vafa. Microscopic ori- gin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.Phys. Lett. B, 379:99–104, 1996.arXiv:hep-th/9601029,doi:10. 1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    Gavin E. Crooks. Entropy production fluctuation the- orem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free en- ergy differences.Phys. Rev. E, 60:2721–2726, Sep 1999. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE. 60.2721,doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721

    doi:10.1103/physreve 1999

  16. [16]

    Hamiltonian derivation of a de- tailed fluctuation theorem.Journal of Statistical Physics, 98:77–102, 2000

    Christopher Jarzynski. Hamiltonian derivation of a de- tailed fluctuation theorem.Journal of Statistical Physics, 98:77–102, 2000

    2000

  17. [17]

    Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications.arXiv preprint cond-mat/0009244, 2000

    Hal Tasaki. Jarzynski relations for quantum systems and some applications.arXiv preprint cond-mat/0009244, 2000

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    A Quantum Fluctuation Theorem

    Jorge Kurchan. A Quantum Fluctuation Theorem. 7 2000.arXiv:cond-mat/0007360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Non- equilibrium fluctuations of black hole horizons and the generalized second law.Phys

    Satoshi Iso, Susumu Okazawa, and Sen Zhang. Non- equilibrium fluctuations of black hole horizons and the generalized second law.Phys. Lett. B, 705:152–156, 2011. arXiv:1008.1184,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09. 114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    smoothness

    verified its consistency using a scalar field on the Schwarzschild background. FTs for matter and for local systems on curved spacetimes have been widely devel- oped as well [21–25]. Independently, [26–30] used Jarzyn- ski equality for studying black hole thermodynamics. Because quantum gravity remains unknown, deriva- tions of FTs for dynamical gravity n...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Massar and R

    S. Massar and R. Parentani. How the change in hori- zon area drives black hole evaporation.Nucl. Phys. B, 575:333–356, 2000.arXiv:gr-qc/9903027,doi:10. 1016/S0550-3213(00)00067-5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  22. [22]

    Stochastic Equations in Black Hole Backgrounds and Non-equilibrium Fluc- tuation Theorems.Nucl

    Satoshi Iso and Susumu Okazawa. Stochastic Equations in Black Hole Backgrounds and Non-equilibrium Fluc- tuation Theorems.Nucl. Phys. B, 851:380–419, 2011. arXiv:1104.2461,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.05. 021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Quantum thermodynamics for a model of an expanding universe

    Nana Liu, John Goold, Ivette Fuentes, Vlatko Vedral, Kavan Modi, and David Edward Bruschi. Quantum thermodynamics for a model of an expanding universe. Class. Quant. Grav., 33:035003, 2016.arXiv:1409.5283, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Marcos L. W. Basso, Jonas Maziero, and Lucas C. C´ eleri. The irreversibility of relativistic time-dilation.Class. Quant. Grav., 40(19):195001, 2023.arXiv:2307.12778, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acf089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Marcos L. W. Basso, Jonas Maziero, and Lucas Chibebe C´ eleri. Quantum Detailed Fluctuation Theorem in Curved Spacetimes: The Observer Dependent Nature of Entropy Production.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134(5):050406, 2025.arXiv:2405.03902,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 134.050406

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    General rela- tivistic fluctuation theorems.Phys

    Yifan Cai, Tao Wang, and Liu Zhao. General rela- tivistic fluctuation theorems.Phys. Lett. B, 860:139220, 2025.arXiv:2407.09912,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2024.139220

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Rafael L. S. Costa, Marcos L. W. Basso, Jonas Maziero, and Lucas C. C´ eleri. Work distribution of quantum fields in static curved spacetimes. 10 2025.arXiv:2510.08265

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Quantum work and in- formation geometry of a quantum Myers-Perry black hole.JHEP, 10:027, 2021.arXiv:2102.03296,doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2021)027

    Behnam Pourhassan, Salman Sajad Wani, Saheb Soroushfar, and Mir Faizal. Quantum work and in- formation geometry of a quantum Myers-Perry black hole.JHEP, 10:027, 2021.arXiv:2102.03296,doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2021)027

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Ait- enov, and Salman Sajad Wani

    Behnam Pourhassan, Houcine Aounallah, Mir Faizal, Sudhaker Upadhyay, Saheb Soroushfar, Yermek O. Ait- enov, and Salman Sajad Wani. Quantum thermodynam- ics of an M2-M5 brane system.JHEP, 05:030, 2022. arXiv:2201.11073,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Quantum thermodynamics of a quantum sized AdS black hole.Nucl

    Behnam Pourhassan, Mahdi Atashi, Houcine Aounallah, 7 Salman Sajad Wani, Mir Faizal, and Barun Majumder. Quantum thermodynamics of a quantum sized AdS black hole.Nucl. Phys. B, 980:115842, 2022.arXiv:2205. 13584,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115842

    arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Quantum Thermo- dynamics of anα ′-Corrected Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole.EPL, 144(2):29001, 2023.arXiv:2301.00687, doi:10.1209/0295-5075/acfff0

    Behnam Pourhassan, Izzet Sakalli, Xiaoping Shi, Mir Faizal, and Salman Sajad Wani. Quantum Thermo- dynamics of anα ′-Corrected Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Hole.EPL, 144(2):29001, 2023.arXiv:2301.00687, doi:10.1209/0295-5075/acfff0

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Thermodynamic phase description of charged 4D Gauss-Bonnet black holes in quantum regime

    Syed Masood. Thermodynamic phase description of charged 4D Gauss-Bonnet black holes in quantum regime. 6 2024.arXiv:2406.05820

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    The Large N limit of super- conformal field theories and supergravity.Adv

    Juan Martin Maldacena. The Large N limit of super- conformal field theories and supergravity.Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:231–252, 1998.arXiv:hep-th/9711200, doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  34. [34]

    S. S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov, and Alexander M. Polyakov. Gauge theory correlators from noncriti- cal string theory.Phys. Lett. B, 428:105–114, 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9802109,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98) 00377-3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  35. [35]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography

    Edward Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2:253–291, 1998.arXiv: hep-th/9802150,doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Netta Engelhardt and Aron C. Wall. Decoding the Ap- parent Horizon: Coarse-Grained Holographic Entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(21):211301, 2018.arXiv:1706. 02038,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.211301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.211301 2018

  37. [37]

    Netta Engelhardt and Aron C. Wall. Coarse Graining Holographic Black Holes.JHEP, 05:160, 2019.arXiv: 1806.01281,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy.JHEP, 04:009, 2023.arXiv:2209.10454,doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)009

    Venkatesa Chandrasekaran, Geoff Penington, and Ed- ward Witten. Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy.JHEP, 04:009, 2023.arXiv:2209.10454,doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2023)009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Coarse-graining black holes out of equi- librium with boundary observables on time slice.JHEP, 05:319, 2024

    Daichi Takeda. Coarse-graining black holes out of equi- librium with boundary observables on time slice.JHEP, 05:319, 2024. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 154 (2024)].arXiv: 2403.07275,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)319

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Heat and work in black hole thermodynamics via holography.JHEP, 05:069, 2025.arXiv:2412.15697,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025) 069

    Tomohiro Shigemura, Keito Shimizu, Sotaro Sugishita, Daichi Takeda, and Takuya Yoda. Heat and work in black hole thermodynamics via holography.JHEP, 05:069, 2025.arXiv:2412.15697,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025) 069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    van Rees

    Kostas Skenderis and Balt C. van Rees. Real-time gauge/gravity duality.Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:081601, 2008.arXiv:0805.0150,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.081601

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    van Rees

    Kostas Skenderis and Balt C. van Rees. Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples.JHEP, 05:085, 2009.arXiv:0812.2909, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    A pre- scription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems

    Paolo Glorioso, Michael Crossley, and Hong Liu. A pre- scription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems. 12 2018.arXiv:1812.08785

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Fluctua- tion theorems: Work is not an observable.Physical Re- view E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 75(5):050102, 2007

    Peter Talkner, Eric Lutz, and Peter H¨ anggi. Fluctua- tion theorems: Work is not an observable.Physical Re- view E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 75(5):050102, 2007

    2007

  45. [45]

    The tasaki–crooks quantum fluctuation theorem.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(26):F569, 2007

    Peter Talkner and Peter H¨ anggi. The tasaki–crooks quantum fluctuation theorem.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(26):F569, 2007

    2007

  46. [46]

    Quantum work relations and response theory.Physical review letters, 100(23):230404, 2008

    David Andrieux and Pierre Gaspard. Quantum work relations and response theory.Physical review letters, 100(23):230404, 2008

    2008

  47. [47]

    Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences.Physical Review Letters, 78(14):2690, 1997

    Christopher Jarzynski. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences.Physical Review Letters, 78(14):2690, 1997

    1997

  48. [48]

    Alhambra, and Eduardo Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez

    Alvaro Ortega, Emma McKay, ´Alvaro M. Alhambra, and Eduardo Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez. Work distributions on quantum fields.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(24):240604, 2019.arXiv:1902.03258,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 122.240604

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Dorner, S

    R. Dorner, S. R. Clark, L. Heaney, R. Fazio, J. Goold, and V. Vedral. Extracting quantum work statistics and fluctuation theorems by single- qubit interferometry.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:230601, Jun 2013. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.230601,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.230601

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2013

  50. [50]

    Detecting the work statistics through Ramsey-like interferometry.Int

    Laura Mazzola, Gabriele De Chiara, and Mauro Pa- ternostro. Detecting the work statistics through Ramsey-like interferometry.Int. J. Quant. Inf., 12(02):1461007, 2014.arXiv:1401.0566,doi:10.1142/ s0219749914610073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    van Rees

    Balt C. van Rees. Real-time gauge/gravity duality and ingoing boundary conditions.Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 192-193:193–196, 2009.arXiv:0902.4010,doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysbps.2009.07.078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    David Brown and James W

    J. David Brown and James W. York, Jr. Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravita- tional action.Phys. Rev. D, 47:1407–1419, 1993.arXiv: gr-qc/9209012,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  53. [53]

    A Stress ten- sor for Anti-de Sitter gravity.Commun

    Vijay Balasubramanian and Per Kraus. A Stress ten- sor for Anti-de Sitter gravity.Commun. Math. Phys., 208:413–428, 1999.arXiv:hep-th/9902121,doi:10. 1007/s002200050764

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking. Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance.Phys. Rev. D, 13:2188–2203, 1976.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2188

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.2188 1976

  55. [55]

    Solodukhin, and Kostas Skenderis

    Sebastian de Haro, Sergey N. Solodukhin, and Kostas Skenderis. Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence.Com- mun. Math. Phys., 217:595–622, 2001.arXiv:hep-th/ 0002230,doi:10.1007/s002200100381

    doi:10.1007/s002200100381 2001

  56. [56]

    Mul- tiple trace operators and nonlocal string theories.JHEP, 08:006, 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0105309,doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2001/08/006

    Ofer Aharony, Micha Berkooz, and Eva Silverstein. Mul- tiple trace operators and nonlocal string theories.JHEP, 08:006, 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0105309,doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2001/08/006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    Multitrace operators, boundary condi- tions, and AdS / CFT correspondence

    Edward Witten. Multitrace operators, boundary condi- tions, and AdS / CFT correspondence. 12 2001.arXiv: hep-th/0112258

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  58. [58]

    ’Dou- ble trace’ deformations, boundary conditions and space- time singularities.JHEP, 05:034, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/ 0112264,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/034

    Micha Berkooz, Amit Sever, and Assaf Shomer. ’Dou- ble trace’ deformations, boundary conditions and space- time singularities.JHEP, 05:034, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/ 0112264,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/034

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/034 2002

  59. [59]

    A Note on multitrace deformations and AdS/CFT.JHEP, 07:027, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/0203168,doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2002/07/027

    Amit Sever and Assaf Shomer. A Note on multitrace deformations and AdS/CFT.JHEP, 07:027, 2002.arXiv:hep-th/0203168,doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2002/07/027

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [60]

    Non- local effects of multi-trace deformations in the AdS/CFT correspondence.JHEP, 10:097, 2005.arXiv:hep-th/ 0504177,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/097

    Ofer Aharony, Micha Berkooz, and Boaz Katz. Non- local effects of multi-trace deformations in the AdS/CFT correspondence.JHEP, 10:097, 2005.arXiv:hep-th/ 0504177,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/097

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/097 2005

  61. [61]

    Clark, and Andreas Karch

    Ofer Aharony, Adam B. Clark, and Andreas Karch. The CFT/AdS correspondence, massive gravitons and a con- nectivity index conjecture.Phys. Rev. D, 74:086006, 2006.arXiv:hep-th/0608089,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 8 74.086006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    An introduction to stochastic thermo- dynamics.Fundamental Theories of Physics

    Naoto Shiraishi. An introduction to stochastic thermo- dynamics.Fundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, Singapore, 2023

    2023

  63. [63]

    Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation the- orems, and counting statistics in quantum systems.Re- views of modern physics, 81(4):1665–1702, 2009

    Massimiliano Esposito, Upendra Harbola, and Shaul Mukamel. Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation the- orems, and counting statistics in quantum systems.Re- views of modern physics, 81(4):1665–1702, 2009

    2009

  64. [64]

    AdS Higgs mechanism from double trace deformed CFT

    Andreas Karch, Mianqi Wang, and Merna Youssef. AdS Higgs mechanism from double trace deformed CFT. JHEP, 02:044, 2024.arXiv:2311.10135,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2024)044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Open AdS/CFT via a double-trace defor- mation.JHEP, 09:012, 2024.arXiv:2311.13633,doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2024)012

    Hao Geng. Open AdS/CFT via a double-trace defor- mation.JHEP, 09:012, 2024.arXiv:2311.13633,doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2024)012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Dissipation in Open Holography

    Andreas Karch and Merna Youssef. Dissipation in Open Holography. 9 2025.arXiv:2509.14312

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Lindblad dynamics in holography.Phys

    Takanori Ishii and Daichi Takeda. Lindblad dynamics in holography.Phys. Rev. D, 112(4):046020, 2025.arXiv: 2504.17320,doi:10.1103/l2rx-t9dd

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025