Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Dark Matter and Baryon Asymmetry from Monopole-Axion Interactions

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dark magnetic monopoles can absorb the energy of a rotating QCD axion, allowing it to produce the baryon asymmetry without overproducing dark matter—if the axion decay constant is below 10^9 GeV.

desk verdict Genuinely new dissipation mechanism with a sharp f_a prediction, but the central rate is asserted, not derived—send it to a referee who will demand the dynamical calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.10603 v2 pith:PXBRNU3C submitted 2025-11-13 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Raymond T. Co , Keisuke Harigaya , Isaac R. Wang , Huangyu Xiao This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO PACS 14.80.Va14.80.Hv95.35.+d
keywords axiondarkmatteraxiogenesismagneticmonopolesdyonsWitteneffectbaryonasymmetrykineticmisalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the rotating QCD axion—whose motion would otherwise generate too much axion dark matter in the minimal axiogenesis scenario—can have its kinetic energy efficiently drained by interactions with dark magnetic monopoles. As the axion field rotates, monopoles become dyons whose quantized electric levels cross, releasing energy as dark fermion pairs. This dissipation leaves just enough axion rotation to produce the observed baryon asymmetry and sets the axion relic abundance to the observed dark matter density. The framework simultaneously explains the strong CP problem, baryogenesis, and dark matter, with a sharp prediction: the axion decay constant must lie below 10^9 GeV. A sympathetic reader would care because it opens a concrete window for axion searches while making the dark sector multi-component.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dyonic level-crossing dissipation rate. In a dark sector with SU(2)_D broken to U(1)_D, 't Hooft–Polyakov monopoles become dyons whose electric level n shifts with the axion angle θ through the Witten effect. With light dark fermions present, the dyon mass formula (Eq. 2.2) lowers the electrostatic contribution, and when θ changes by 2π, adjacent levels cross with an energy gap that can exceed 2m_f, allowing M_{n-1} → M_n + f_1^c + f_2. The paper assumes one such crossing per 2π rotation, giving the dissipation rate Γ_θ = (2α_D/π)(m_f/m_W)(f_M ξ_DM/Y_θ). This rate is what converts the axion's kinetic energy into dark fermion pairs, depleting the PQ charge yield Y_θ

What would settle it

A first-principles calculation (e.g., a Landau–Zener-type analysis) of a dyon in a time-dependent θ background that yields a transition probability per 2π rotation significantly below unity, or that shows the released energy goes into other channels, would invalidate the dissipation rate of Eq. (3.1). Alternatively, an axion discovery with f_a > 10^9 GeV combined with an independent confirmation that the baryon asymmetry arises from axiogenesis would rule out this specific mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper introduces a new dissipation mechanism for a rotating axion. A QCD axion coupled anomalously to a dark SU(2)_D gauge group turns 't Hooft–Polyakov monopoles into dyons via the Witten effect, with the electric charge of each monopole proportional to θ = a/f_a. As θ rotates, adjacent quantized dyon levels cross; at each crossing the dyon decays into a light dark fermion pair, releasing energy 2m_f. This yields an energy-loss rate (Eq. 3.1) that depletes the axion rotation before it can overproduce axion dark matter, while still leaving enough rotation for axiogenesis to generate the baryon asymmetry. The final axion relic density matches the observed dark matter abundance for f_a ≲ 1

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each full rotation of the axion triggers exactly one dyon level crossing releasing 2m_f into dark fermions, with the static dyon mass formula applied instantaneously to the time-varying θ; if the transition is suppressed by non-adiabatic effects or the dyon decays through a different channel, the dissipation is inefficient and the axion overproduction problem returns.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The axion decay constant must fall below about 10^9 GeV (and above roughly 4×10^8 GeV from neutron-star cooling for the standard hadronic axion), making the QCD axion heavier than in standard misalignment and directly targetable by axion searches.
  • Dark matter becomes multi-component: QCD axions, dark monopoles, and dark fermions contribute comparable energy densities in the allowed parameter space.
  • The dark fermion mass is constrained to a few hundred GeV, placing the annihilation products in a detectable range for indirect dark matter searches.
  • The monopole and fermion components are self-interacting through the dark U(1), giving dissipative self-interaction signatures in structure formation.
  • The mechanism resolves the factor-of-70 tension of minimal axiogenesis: the same PQ charge that yields the observed baryon asymmetry no longer overproduces axion dark matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dyon level-crossing dissipation could be extended to axion-like particles (ALPs) beyond the QCD axion, where the same mechanism would relax the f_a bound and produce a richer dark sector phenomenology.
  • If a non-adiabatic calculation confirms the per-period transition probability, the mechanism could be used to drain other rotating scalar fields, such as moduli or inflatons, opening new channels for early-universe energy transfer.
  • A lattice simulation of the rotating axion–monopole system could directly test whether exactly one fermion pair is emitted per 2π sweep, which is the assumption anchoring the entire parameter space; such a calculation would also calibrate the Landau–Zener suppression.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a new cosmological mechanism in which a rotating QCD axion, responsible for baryogenesis through axiogenesis, loses its kinetic energy via interactions with dark 't Hooft–Polyakov monopoles. The axion field turns monopoles into dyons through the Witten effect; as the axion rotates, the dyon levels cross periodically and the resulting decays into light dark fermions dissipate the axion rotation. The authors argue that this dissipation depletes the axion relic density to the observed dark matter abundance while preserving the baryon asymmetry, and they derive a parameter space in the f_a–m_f/m_W plane. The main prediction is f_a below about 10^9 GeV, with dark matter composed of monopoles, dark fermions, and axions. The paper includes analytic estimates for the dissipation temperature, axion relic abundance, dark fermion freeze-out, and constraints from sphaleron washout, parametric resonance, and astrophysical bounds.

Significance. If the central dissipation rate is correct, the mechanism is novel and addresses a real tension in the minimal axiogenesis scenario: the axion rotation that explains the baryon asymmetry would overproduce axion dark matter by a factor of about 70. The proposed solution is concrete and falsifiable, with a sharp prediction for the axion decay constant and a multi-component dark matter picture. The authors also provide useful analytic scaling formulas and include several secondary checks. However, the entire mechanism hinges on an assumed microscopic rate that is not derived, and at least one subsequent abundance estimate contains a technical error. The framework is interesting and worth pursuing, but the current manuscript does not yet establish the central claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1)]
  2. [§4.1, PR backreaction]
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (4.25)]
  4. [§3.2 and §4.1]
minor comments (3)
  1. [§1, Fig. 1]
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.7)]
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (4.2)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Y_theta is fixed from the observed baryon asymmetry, the dissipation rate is a stated model assumption rather than a fit, and the final DM abundance is computed and then compared to xi_DM only afterwards.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. Eq. (2.4) fixes the initial PQ-charge yield Y_theta from the observed baryon asymmetry through axiogenesis (Y_B = c_B T_EW^2 Y_theta/f_a^2), so the baryon input is external data. Eqs. (3.1)-(3.4) define the monopole level-crossing dissipation rate as Gamma_theta = eps*xi_DM/Y_theta. The physical input there is the monopole energy density rho_M = f_M*rho_DM, and xi_DM is used as the observed comoving DM density scale; this is not the axion abundance being predicted. Eq. (3.5) integrates the dissipation, Eq. (4.2) determines t_trap by equating the rotational kinetic energy to either the QCD potential barrier or the dyon-axion potential barrier, and Eqs. (4.4)-(4.6) evaluate rho_a/s from the resulting axion number density at trapping. The observed xi_DM appears as a normalization of the final relic abundance and in the scaling of the monopole density, but the axion abundance is not set equal to xi_DM before it is computed; the condition rho_a+rho_f <= (1-f_M)xi_DM is imposed as a constraint in Fig. 2. The central microscopic rate Eq. (3.1) - 'A level crossing occurs once every 2pi, each time releasing an energy of 2m_f' - is assumed rather than derived from a Landau-Zener or dynamical calculation. This is a genuine robustness/correctness concern: if the transition probability is suppressed or the energy release is smaller, the parameter space changes. But it is not circular, because Eq. (3.1) is not fitted to the DM density and its failure would destroy the prediction rather than reproduce it by construction. Citations to the authors' earlier axiogenesis [28-30] and kinetic misalignment [32-34,49] are external, independently developed mechanisms used as ingredients, not the target claim of this paper, and the dyon mass formula Eq. (2.2) is taken from the non-self citation Ref. [43]. The paper itself flags its conditional assumptions (e.g. footnote 3: 'We assume that the thermalization occurs before parametric resonance becomes effective'), which supports treating those steps as assumptions rather than as circular reductions. No load-bearing step reduces by definition to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain, so the honest score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The framework leans on standard axion and monopole physics, but the key dissipative step (one level crossing per rotation) and the stability against parametric resonance are assumed/ad hoc; the headline prediction is controlled by hand-picked benchmark parameters rather than a fit.

free parameters (7)
  • c_B = 0.3 (assumed; minimal SM gives 0.1)
    Charge transport coefficient in axiogenesis, Eq. (2.3)-(2.4); set to 0.3 as an 'optimized choice', affecting the predicted f_a range.
  • α_D = 0.2
    Dark U(1)_D gauge coupling; benchmark choice in Fig. 2 and the dissipation/dark-fermion formulas.
  • f_M = 0.5
    Fraction of dark matter in monopoles; 'optimized' by hand to open the parameter space, as discussed in Sec. 4.2.
  • m_S = 10 MeV
    Radial mode mass; assumed for the SU(2)_D sphaleron washout constraint and the AMM abundance estimate (Sec. 4.1).
  • m_W = scanned 20-100 TeV
    Dark gauge boson mass; sets monopole mass m_M = m_W/α_D ~ 100-500 TeV and enters the fermion DM abundance.
  • m_f/m_W = scanned ~1e-4 to ~1
    Ratio of dark fermion mass to gauge boson mass; central parameter in the level-crossing dissipation and fermion relic density.
  • N_DW = 1 (assumed)
    Domain wall number, used in Eq. (4.16) for T_S and the AMM contribution; implicitly taken as 1 (KSVZ).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard QCD axion phenomenology (PQ mechanism, temperature-dependent axion mass Eq. 4.3-4.4).
    Used throughout as the background framework; standard and accepted.
  • domain assumption Dark SU(2)_D broken to U(1)_D produces 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles and the Witten effect (Sec. 2.1).
    Monopole mass, charge, and dyon spectrum depend on this gauge structure.
  • domain assumption Dyon mass formula Eq. (2.2) from Refs [40-43] is valid for a time-dependent θ.
    The dissipation rate is proportional to the mass gap; the formula is imported from static-dyon calculations without a derivation for dynamical θ.
  • ad hoc to paper Each 2π rotation of the axion induces exactly one dyon level crossing that emits a fermion pair of energy 2m_f (Eq. 3.1).
    This is the core dissipation ansatz, not derived from a non-adiabatic transition calculation; it is the load-bearing premise of the mechanism.
  • domain assumption Axion rotation is initiated by the Affleck-Dine mechanism and thermalizes to circular motion before parametric resonance becomes effective (Sec. 3.2).
    Standard axiogenesis setup; the paper explicitly assumes thermalization occurs before PR.
  • ad hoc to paper Parametric resonance backreaction does not destroy the coherent rotation before trapping (Sec. 4.1).
    Asserted via an undocumented numerical check; if false, the relic abundance calculation breaks down.
invented entities (3)
  • Dark magnetic monopoles (mass ~100-500 TeV)
    purpose: Dissipate axion kinetic energy via dyon level crossings and constitute a fraction f_M of the dark matter.
    No direct collider or astrophysical handle outside the model; their observable consequences are model-dependent.
  • Light dark fermions f (two SU(2)_D doublets)
    purpose: Emitted at dyon level crossings, carrying away the mass-gap energy and forming a dark matter component.
    Their mass and couplings are model parameters; no independent experimental signature is identified except within the cosmological model.
  • Massless dark photon (U(1)_D gauge boson)
    purpose: Mediates dyon electric charge, dark fermion annihilation, Sommerfeld enhancement, and self-interacting dissipative dark matter.
    No observational handle outside the model; the dark sector is secluded from the Standard Model except via the axion anomaly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Matter and Baryon Asymmetry from Monopole-Axion Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PXBRNU3C

@misc{pith2026251110603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Matter and Baryon Asymmetry from Monopole-Axion Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PXBRNU3C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.10603}
}
abstract

We introduce a novel mechanism where the kinetic energy of a rotating axion can be dissipated by the interactions with dark magnetic monopoles. This mechanism leads to a framework where the QCD axion and dark monopoles account for the dark matter density, and the observed baryon asymmetry is generated through the rotating QCD axion via axiogenesis. The monopoles acquire masses from a nonzero axion field, and they can transition between different quantized dyonic levels in the presence of a rotating axion field. The axion kinetic energy is dissipated by the transition, and thus the axion abundance is depleted to the observed dark matter abundance. We predict that the axion decay constant should be below $10^9$ GeV to explain the observed dark matter and baryon densities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Properties of the Monopole Bag

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Monopole bags in axionic backgrounds gravitationally collapse into horizonless states or dyonic regular black holes that evade singularities while retaining axionic hair.

  2. Gravitational Properties of the Monopole Bag

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Monopole bags in axion models can collapse into horizonless objects or dyonic regular black holes that evade singularities and retain axionic structure through Chern-Simons effects.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 58 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. M. Polyakov,Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,JETP Lett.20(1974) 194–195

    1974

  2. [2]

    ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 276–284

    1974

  3. [3]

    Y. B. Zeldovich and M. Y. Khlopov,On the Concentration of Relic Magnetic Monopoles in the Universe,Phys. Lett. B79(1978) 239–241

    1978

  4. [4]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220–1223

    1982

  5. [5]

    Preskill,MAGNETIC MONOPOLES,Ann

    J. Preskill,MAGNETIC MONOPOLES,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.34(1984) 461–530

    1984

  6. [6]

    Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys

    J. Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 1365

    1979

  7. [7]

    Murayama and J

    H. Murayama and J. Shu,Topological Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B686(2010) 162–165, [0905.1720]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    V. A. Rubakov,Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles and Proton Decay,JETP Lett.33(1981) 644–646

    1981

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    C. G. Callan, Jr.,Monopole Catalysis of Baryon Decay,Nucl. Phys. B212(1983) 391–400

    1983

  2. [10]

    Csáki, Y

    C. Csáki, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, and J. Terning,Pairwise Multiparticle States and the Monopole Unitarity Puzzle,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 18 181601, [2109.01145]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    T. D. Brennan,Callan-Rubakov effect and higher charge monopoles,JHEP02(2023) 159, [2109.11207]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    T. D. Brennan,A New Solution to the Callan Rubakov Effect,2309.00680

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    T. D. Brennan, L.-T. Wang, and H. Xiao,Monopole Catalyzed Baryogenesis with aθangle, 2412.14239

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    van Beest, P

    M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, R. Mouland, and D. Tong,Fermion-monopole scattering in the Standard Model,JHEP08(2024) 004, [2312.17746]. – 14 –

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bogojevic and C

    S. Bogojevic and C. P. Burgess,On the EFT of Dyon-Monopole Catalysis,2407.20146

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Csáki, R

    C. Csáki, R. Ovadia, O. Telem, J. Terning, and S. Yankielowicz,Abelian Instantons and Monopole Scattering,2406.13738

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Loladze and T

    V. Loladze and T. Okui,Monopole-Fermion Scattering and the Solution to the Semiton/Unitarity Puzzle,2408.04577

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    V. V. Khoze,Monopoles and fermions in the Standard Model,JHEP09(2024) 146, [2405.18689]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dawson and A

    S. Dawson and A. N. Schellekens,Monopole - Fermion Interactions: The Soliton Picture, Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 3125

    1983

  12. [20]

    Arafune and M

    J. Arafune and M. Fukugita,Velocity Dependent Factors for the Rubakov Process for Slowly Moving Magnetic Monopoles in Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1901

    1983

  13. [21]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada,Suppressing the QCD Axion Abundance by Hidden Monopoles,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 677–681, [1511.05030]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nomura, S

    Y. Nomura, S. Rajendran, and F. Sanches,Axion Isocurvature and Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 14 141803, [1511.06347]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada,Adiabatic suppression of the axion abundance and isocurvature due to coupling to hidden monopoles,JHEP01(2018) 053, [1708.06047]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Banerjee and M

    A. Banerjee and M. A. Buen-Abad,Dynamical axion misalignment from the Witten effect, JHEP02(2025) 078, [2410.21369]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece, and J. Stout,Axion Mass from Magnetic Monopole Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 13 131602, [2105.09950]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Garcia Garcia, M

    I. Garcia Garcia, M. Kongsore, and K. Van Tilburg,Dyon Loops and Abelian Instantons, 2506.14867

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

    E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283–287

    1979

  20. [28]

    R. T. Co and K. Harigaya,Axiogenesis,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 11 111602, [1910.02080]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, K. Mukaida, and M. Yamada,Spontaneous Baryogenesis from Axions with Generic Couplings,JHEP08(2020) 096, [2006.03148]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Predictions for Axion Couplings from ALP Cogenesis, JHEP01(2021) 172, [2006.04809]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B249(1985) 361–380

    1985

  24. [32]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 25 251802, [1910.14152]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Eröncel, R

    C. Eröncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen,ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window,JCAP10(2022) 053, [2206.14259]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Fasiello, J

    M. Fasiello, J. Lizarraga, A. Papageorgiou, and A. Urio,Kinetic fragmentation of the QCD axion on the lattice,JCAP09(2025) 019, [2507.01822]

    2025

  27. [35]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce,Gravitational waves and dark photon dark matter from axion rotations,JHEP12(2021) 099, [2104.02077]. – 15 –

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Madge, W

    E. Madge, W. Ratzinger, D. Schmitt, and P. Schwaller,Audible axions with a booster: Stochastic gravitational waves from rotating ALPs,SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 5 171, [2111.12730]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  30. [38]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  31. [39]

    E. J. Weinberg,Classical solutions in quantum field theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2012

    2012

  32. [40]

    Hook and C

    A. Hook and C. Ristow,Theta dependence in the presence of massless fermions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 7 075017, [2403.09482]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Grossman,DOES A DYON LEAK?,Phys

    B. Grossman,DOES A DYON LEAK?,Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 464

    1983

  34. [42]

    Yamagishi,THE FERMION MONOPOLE SYSTEM REEXAMINED,Phys

    H. Yamagishi,THE FERMION MONOPOLE SYSTEM REEXAMINED,Phys. Rev. D27 (1983) 2383–2396

    1983

  35. [43]

    Hook and C

    A. Hook and C. Ristow,Dyonic bound states,JHEP03(2025) 042, [2409.07549]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. S. Blaer, N. H. Christ, and J.-F. Tang,ANOMALOUS FERMION PRODUCTION BY A JULIA-ZEE DYON,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 1364

    1981

  37. [45]

    A. S. Blaer, N. H. Christ, and J.-F. Tang,Fermion Emission From a Julia-zee Dyon,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2128

    1982

  38. [46]

    W. J. Marciano and I. J. Muzinich,EXACT FERMION DYON SCATTERING SOLUTIONS,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 973

    1983

  39. [47]

    C. S. Lam and T.-M. Yan,Gauge Invariance, Charge Conservation and Axial Anomaly in Fermion - Monopole Interactions,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3221

    1985

  40. [48]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Harigaya, and K. Mukaida,Charge transfer between rotating complex scalar fields,JHEP08(2022) 234, [2205.00942]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner,Axion Kinetic Misalignment and Parametric Resonance from Inflation,JCAP08(2020) 036, [2004.00629]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    R. T. Co, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,Lepto-Axiogenesis,JHEP 03(2021) 017, [2006.05687]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Harigaya and I

    K. Harigaya and I. R. Wang,Axiogenesis fromSU(2)R phase transition,JHEP10(2021) 022, [2107.09679]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 193 (2021)]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. H. Jung, and T. Okui,Composite neutrinos and the QCD axion: Baryogenesis, dark matter, small Dirac neutrino masses, and vanishing neutron electric dipole moment,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 1 015024, [2108.04293]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kawamura and S

    J. Kawamura and S. Raby,Lepto-axiogenesis in minimal SUSY KSVZ model,JHEP04 (2022) 116, [2109.08605]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, Z. Johnson, and A. Pierce,R-parity violation axiogenesis,JHEP11 (2021) 210, [2110.05487]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Barnes, R

    P. Barnes, R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce,Lepto-axiogenesis and the scale of supersymmetry,JHEP05(2023) 114, [2208.07878]. – 16 –

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    R. T. Co, V. Domcke, and K. Harigaya,Baryogenesis from decaying magnetic helicity in axiogenesis,JHEP07(2023) 179, [2211.12517]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Barnes, R

    P. Barnes, R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce,Lepto-axiogenesis with light right-handed neutrinos,JHEP08(2025) 004, [2402.10263]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,Universal Bound on the Duration of a Kination Era,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 10 101002, [2501.17226]

    2025

  51. [59]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y. Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,A New Source for (QCD) Axion Dark Matter Production: Curvature-Induced,2503.04880

  52. [60]

    Bodas, R

    A. Bodas, R. T. Co, A. Ghalsasi, K. Harigaya, and L.-T. Wang,Acoustic misalignment mechanism for axion dark matter,JHEP08(2025) 131, [2503.04888]

    2025

  53. [61]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya,QCD Axion Dark Matter with a Small Decay Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 21 211602, [1711.10486]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    L. D. McLerran, E. Mottola, and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Sphalerons and Axion Dynamics in High Temperature QCD,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 2027–2035

    1991

  55. [63]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J. O. Thompson, and K. Van Tilburg, Large-misalignment mechanism for the formation of compact axion structures: Signatures from the QCD axion to fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 8 083014, [1909.11665]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Harigaya, W

    K. Harigaya, W. Hu, R. Liu, and H. Xiao,Universal lower bound on the axion decay constant from free streaming effects,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 6 063554, [2507.01956]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    R. T. Co, T. Lee, and O. P. Leonard,(Non-)Perturbative Dynamics of a Light QCD Axion: Dark Matter and the Strong CP Problem,2508.00979

  58. [66]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,Reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 73(1994) 3195–3198, [hep-th/9405187]

    1994 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3258–3295, [hep-ph/9704452]

    1997 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Fonseca, E

    N. Fonseca, E. Morgante, R. Sato, and G. Servant,Axion fragmentation,JHEP04(2020) 010, [1911.08472]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Jaeckel, V

    J. Jaeckel, V. M. Mehta, and L. T. Witkowski,Monodromy Dark Matter,JCAP01(2017) 036, [1605.01367]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Berges, A

    J. Berges, A. Chatrchyan, and J. Jaeckel,Foamy Dark Matter from Monodromies,JCAP08 (2019) 020, [1903.03116]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Di Luzio, F

    L. Di Luzio, F. Mescia, E. Nardi, P. Panci, and R. Ziegler,Astrophobic Axions,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 26 261803, [1712.04940]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Björkeroth, L

    F. Björkeroth, L. Di Luzio, F. Mescia, E. Nardi, P. Panci, and R. Ziegler,Axion-electron decoupling in nucleophobic axion models,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 3 035027, [1907.06575]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Badziak and K

    M. Badziak and K. Harigaya,Naturally astrophobic QCD axion,JHEP06(2023) 014, [2301.09647]. [74]Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanimet al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]. – 17 –

    2023 arXiv

  66. [75]

    L. B. Leinson,Impact of axions on the Cassiopea A neutron star cooling,JCAP09(2021) 001, [2105.14745]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long, and B. R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 9 091102, [2111.09892]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [77]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    1979

  69. [78]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

    1980

  70. [79]

    Harigaya and J

    K. Harigaya and J. M. Leedom,QCD Axion Dark Matter from a Late Time Phase Transition,JHEP06(2020) 034, [1910.04163]. [80]NA62 Collaboration, E. Cortina Gilet al.,The Beam and detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN,JINST12(2017), no. 05 P05025, [1703.08501]. [81]KLEVER Project...

    2020 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Sommerfeld,Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen,Annalen Phys.403(1931), no

    A. Sommerfeld,Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen,Annalen Phys.403(1931), no. 3 257–330

    1931

  72. [83]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner,A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 015014, [0810.0713]

    2009 arXiv

  73. [84]

    Cassel,Sommerfeld factor for arbitrary partial wave processes,J

    S. Cassel,Sommerfeld factor for arbitrary partial wave processes,J. Phys. G37(2010) 105009, [0903.5307]

    2010 arXiv

  74. [85]

    Agrawal, F.-Y

    P. Agrawal, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, L. Randall, and J. Scholtz,Make Dark Matter Charged Again, JCAP05(2017) 022, [1610.04611]

    2017 arXiv

  75. [86]

    J. H. Chang, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and C. Kouvaris,Structure Formation and Exotic Compact Objects in a Dissipative Dark Sector,JCAP03(2019) 036, [1812.07000]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [87]

    Essig, S

    R. Essig, S. D. Mcdermott, H.-B. Yu, and Y.-M. Zhong,Constraining Dissipative Dark Matter Self-Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 12 121102, [1809.01144]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [88]

    Huo, H.-B

    R. Huo, H.-B. Yu, and Y.-M. Zhong,The Structure of Dissipative Dark Matter Halos,JCAP 06(2020) 051, [1912.06757]

    2020 arXiv

  78. [89]

    X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, L. Necib, F. Jiang, M. Boylan-Kolchin, and A. Wetzel,Dissipative dark matter on FIRE – I. Structural and kinematic properties of dwarf galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506(2021), no. 3 4421–4445, [2102.09580]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [90]

    H. Xiao, X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, and K. M. Zurek,SMBH seeds from dissipative dark matter,JCAP07(2021) 039, [2103.13407]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [91]

    X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, L. Necib, F. Jiang, M. Boylan-Kolchin, and A. Wetzel,Dissipative Dark Matter on FIRE. II. Observational Signatures and Constraints from Local Dwarf Galaxies,Astrophys. J.966(2024), no. 1 131, [2206.05327]. – 18 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.