Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Adding drift to a flat inflationary potential makes the time-reversed stochastic-δN formalism exactly solvable, with curvature tails that differ from the forward formalism by a factor of two in the exponent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 19:58 UTC pith:X44FBTL4

load-bearing objection A clean analytic extension of time-reversed stochastic inflation to constant drift; the math is careful and the paper is honest about the fact that forward and reverse prescriptions define different observables. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.21388 v2 pith:X44FBTL4 submitted 2025-11-26 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Friction in Stochastic Inflation

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords stochastic inflationtime-reversed stochastic inflationδN formalismcurvature perturbationquantum diffusionfirst-passage timeeternal inflationFokker-Planck equation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper solves time-reversed stochastic inflation on a semi-infinite flat potential with a constant drift, deriving the exact probability distribution of curvature fluctuations. The drift regularises the otherwise divergent e-fold lifetimes, turning the Levy-like power-law tails into exponential tails with a power-law prefactor. Comparing the time-reversed and forward stochastic δN prescriptions, the paper finds they disagree quantitatively: the reverse distribution has tails ∝ |ζ|^{-5/2} e^{-α̂²|ζ|/χ₀²}, while the forward distribution has tails ∝ ζ^{-3/2} e^{-α̂²ζ/(2χ₀²)}. Only the time-reversed distribution becomes Gaussian in the large-drift limit, and only it remains finite for negative drift, the toy-model case of eternal inflation. The root of the difference is that averaging lifetimes and marginalising over lifetimes do not commute.

Core claim

For a coarse-grained inflaton obeying dφ = -(α/Δφ∞)dN + (Hinf/2π)dW on a semi-infinite flat potential with an absorbing wall, the paper derives the exact time-reversed transition probability and shows it is independent of the forward drift, because conditioning a drifted Brownian motion on its final state yields the same bridge process. Friction enters only through the lifetime distribution, an inverse-Gaussian-like first-passage distribution. Defining curvature as ζ = ⟨ΔN⟩ - ΔN at fixed lifetime and then marginalising over lifetimes gives the exact distribution P(ζ|φ₀) in Eq. (3.12), with exponential tails. The forward formalism, which instead identifies curvature with lifetime fluctuations

What carries the argument

Time-reversed stochastic inflation: condition all forward stochastic realisations by their lifetime ΔN₀, solve the time-reversed Fokker-Planck equation with the reverse drift of Eq. (2.21), and then marginalise over lifetimes. The key structural fact is that the reverse drift is the same as in the driftless flat potential, so the constant forward friction does not alter the intra-lifetime quantum dynamics; it only shapes the lifetime distribution. The curvature variable is ζ = ⟨ΔN⟩ - ΔN at fixed lifetime, and the final observable P(ζ|φ₀) is obtained by integrating P(ζ|φ₀,ΔN₀) against the lifetime distribution PLT(ΔN₀|φ₀)/ΔN₀.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that curvature fluctuations are defined as deviations of the time-reversed e-fold number from its mean at fixed lifetime, ζ = ⟨ΔN⟩ - ΔN, followed by marginalisation over lifetimes; if the physical curvature instead averages lifetimes first, the derived distribution does not describe the observable curvature.

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution Monte Carlo or lattice simulation of the full stochastic dynamics on the tilted semi-infinite potential, histogram the curvature of regions where inflation ends, and compare the tail slope: if the decays behave as ζ^{-3/2} e^{-α̂²ζ/(2χ₀²)} rather than |ζ|^{-5/2} e^{-α̂²|ζ|/χ₀²}, the time-reversed postulate is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the curvature distribution in a slightly tilted flat plateau of inflation is exactly given by Eq. (3.12), with exponential tails and all moments finite for positive drift.
  • The forward and time-reversed stochastic δN prescriptions are not equivalent in quantum diffusion: their tail exponents differ (power -3/2 versus -5/2) and the exponential decay rates differ by a factor of two.
  • In the classical-like large-drift limit, only the time-reversed distribution becomes Gaussian; the forward distribution stays one-sided exponential.
  • For negative drift, which models a simple eternal-inflation regime, the forward formalism is pathological (negative mean e-folds, distribution undefined below a cutoff), while the time-reversed formalism gives a finite, normalisable distribution with exponential tails.
  • The source of all these differences is the non-commutation of averaging and marginalising over lifetimes, making the choice of reference e-fold number N♭ physically consequential when quantum diffusion dominates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If observers are defined by the end of inflation and the total number of e-folds, the time-reversed result is the more natural prediction for observable curvature in a quantum-diffusion regime; the forward formalism effectively assumes no curvature fluctuations at fixed lifetime.
  • The factor-of-two difference in the exponential tail exponent would translate into order-of-magnitude differences in predicted primordial black hole abundances from plateau-like potentials, so the choice of prescription is not just conceptual.
  • Because the reverse drift is independent of the forward drift for any constant-drift Langevin equation, the regularising effect of friction on the time-reversed distribution should be generic beyond the specific tilted potential considered here.
  • A natural testable extension is to solve time-reversed stochastic inflation in a bounded tilted quantum well, interpolating between the unbounded semi-infinite result and existing bounded-well results, to see whether the reverse prescription's distinctive features persist.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the authors' time-reversed stochastic-inflation program to a semi-infinite flat potential with a constant drift term. It solves the forward Fokker-Planck equation for a drifted Brownian motion with an absorbing wall, constructs the time-reversed Brownian bridge, and derives a curvature distribution by defining ζ = ⟨ΔN⟩ - ΔN at fixed lifetime and then marginalizing over lifetimes. The result is compared with the forward stochastic-δN distribution: both have exponential tails, but the exponents differ by a factor of two; in the large-drift limit the reverse distribution becomes Gaussian while the forward one does not; and for negative drift the forward formalism becomes pathological while the reverse distribution remains finite. The paper concludes that the choice of background and of N♭ in stochastic δN is not innocuous when quantum diffusion dominates.

Significance. If the reverse-time variable is accepted as the relevant curvature observable, this is a substantive result: it provides exact analytic control for a nontrivial infinite-dimensional stochastic problem, gives explicit tail asymptotics, is consistent with the α→0 limit and with numerical integration of Eq. (3.12), and offers a clean toy model for eternal inflation. The model has no fitted parameters: α̂ and χ0 are inputs, and the Brownian-bridge conditioning is derived, not assumed. The main strength is the explicit, internally consistent calculation of the two distributions and of their asymptotic tails. However, the significance of the factor-of-two discrepancy depends entirely on whether Eq. (3.1) defines the same physical curvature perturbation as the forward δN variable; this is asserted but not demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1); §4.1] The central comparison is between two different stochastic variables, not two prescriptions for the same curvature perturbation. Equation (3.1) defines ζ as a fluctuation of the reverse e-fold time around its conditional mean at fixed lifetime, and Eq. (3.5) then marginalizes over all field-crossing events inside each Brownian bridge. In the separate-universe picture, each Hubble patch yields one curvature perturbation determined by the total e-fold number along the whole trajectory to the end-of-inflation hypersurface; that is what the forward distribution P(ζfw) in Eq. (4.3) computes. The paper never specifies the hypersurface or slicing on which the reverse ζ is defined, nor shows that Eq. (3.1) reduces to the standard δN curvature in a semi-classical limit. Section 4.1 explicitly concedes that 'taking average and marginalising over lifetimes do not commute', and the Conclusion states
  2. [§2.2–§2.5, Eq. (2.12)] The exact solution Eq. (2.24) is for a Brownian bridge with strictly constant drift and diffusion coefficients on the half-line. The physical motivation Eq. (2.10) realizes this only for Δφ ≪ Δφ∞/α, and Section 2.5 argues that large-excursion distortions are 'under control' without a quantitative estimate. Since the claimed exactness of P(ζ|φ0) in Eq. (3.12) inherits this constant-coefficient idealization, the paper should state more sharply that the central results are formal statements for the model of Eq. (2.12), with the tilted potential serving only as motivation; alternatively, it should give a bound or estimate of the distortion induced by the breakdown of the linear-tilt approximation and by any patching at Δφ ≃ Δφ∞/α. This would not change the internal mathematics, but it would make the physical scope of the 'exact' claim precise.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.4, Eq. (2.21) and §3.2, Eq. (3.21)] The longest algebraic steps are hidden in 'after some algebra' and in the 'tedious algebra' leading to the tail expression Eq. (3.21). Because the factor-of-two tail claim is the central quantitative result, an appendix with the intermediate simplifications would substantially help verification, especially since the paper notes that standard computer algebra fails at this expansion.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.12)] Calling Eq. (3.12) 'exact' is slightly overstrong: for generic χ̂0 the integrand P(ζ/χ0² χ̂0² | χ̂0) is itself only available from numerical integration of Eq. (3.5). I suggest wording such as 'exact integral representation' to avoid confusion.
  3. [Figures 1 and 2] The contour plots would be easier to read if the caption identified the colour scale as the rescaled probability density and stated the units of the colour bar; currently the reader must infer this from the axis label.
  4. [§2.3, Eq. (2.16)] Equation (2.16) is the inverse-Gaussian first-passage distribution; naming it explicitly would help orient readers familiar with first-passage theory.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular step: the drift enters only through the lifetime distribution, the Brownian-bridge input is external, and the definition of ζ in Eq. (3.1) is explicit rather than a hidden fit.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The model inputs are F = -α/Δφ∞, G, the absorbing boundary φqw, and the stochastic δN prescription; no parameter is fitted to the output distribution. Eq. (2.21) shows that the reverse drift becomes independent of α because the α terms cancel identically in Eq. (2.18), and the reverse probability Eq. (2.24) is the standard Brownian-bridge density cited both to the authors' prior Ref. [82] and to the external Ref. [87]; this is an external mathematical input, not an ansatz invented by the present paper. The variable whose distribution is computed is explicitly defined in Eq. (3.1) as ζ = ⟨ΔN⟩ − ΔN, and the paper then performs a variable substitution and marginalization (Eqs. 3.4–3.12). This is a definition of the observable, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The paper also states the key interpretative caveat in Sec. 4.1: “Taking average and marginalising over lifetimes do not commute,” and it acknowledges in the conclusion that “the choice of N♭ ... is not innocuous when quantum diffusion dominates.” Thus the comparison with ζfw is presented as a comparison between different prescriptions, not as an independently predicted observable. Some technical integrals (e.g., Eq. 3.2 and the tail expansion Eq. 3.19) are deferred to the authors' Ref. [82], but they are disclosed, parameter-free mathematical results and do not reduce the new claims—the drift regularization, the factor-of-two tail difference, and the Gaussian large-drift limit—to the cited paper's conclusions. The stated limitation that no solutions exist for non-flat or bounded potentials (Sec. 4.1) affects physical generality, not internal consistency. No circularity step meets the evidentiary standard of the review.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No data fitting; the only free parameters are the model inputs α̂ and χ0. The derivation relies on standard stochastic calculus and the Brownian-bridge theorem, plus the domain-specific separate-universe/δN prescription and the quantum-wall boundary condition. The constant-drift approximation is an acknowledged toy-model assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • α̂ (rescaled drift coefficient)
    Dimensionless drift parameter α̂ = α/(G^2) * Δφ0/Δφ∞ (Eq. 3.13). Chosen by hand as the model input controlling the linear potential tilt; not fitted to data. Results are functions of it.
  • χ0 (initial field distance in diffusion units)
    χ0 = Δφ0/G (Eq. 3.11), the initial field displacement from the quantum wall in units of the diffusion scale. Scanned as a parameter to set the regime (diffusion vs fluxing); not fitted.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Itô stochastic calculus and Fokker-Planck equation for the Langevin dynamics (Eq. 2.2).
    Background for forward transition probability and first-passage times.
  • standard math Time-reversed Markov diffusion formula for the reverse drift (Eq. 2.7), from Anderson/Nagasawa.
    Used to derive the reverse drift F̄; the solution P̄ is the Brownian bridge.
  • standard math Conditioning a drifted Brownian motion on its endpoint yields a process independent of the drift.
    Used in Section 2.4 to conclude the reverse process is unchanged by α.
  • domain assumption Separate-universe / stochastic δN formalism: curvature fluctuation ζ is identified with the difference between the actual and mean number of e-folds (Eq. 3.1).
    Central physical interpretation; the paper acknowledges the background definition is ambiguous.
  • domain assumption Absorbing boundary at φqw (quantum wall); quantum diffusion ends there.
    Boundary condition for the forward problem and start of the reverse process.
  • ad hoc to paper Constant friction approximation of a linearly tilted potential with constant H (Section 2.2).
    The potential V = V0(1+α Δφ/Δφ∞) is treated as a flat semi-infinite domain with constant drift; valid only for Δφ ≪ Δφ∞/α, as the paper states.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22799 in / 13994 out tokens · 121456 ms · 2026-08-03T19:58:44.330147+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We solve time-reversed stochastic inflation in the semi-infinite flat potential with a constant drift term and derive an exact expression for the probability distribution of the curvature fluctuations. It exhibits exponential decaying tails which contrast to the Levy-like power law behaviour encountered without friction. Such a non-vanishing drift acts as a regulator for the conventional ``forward'' stochastic $\delta N$-formalism, which is otherwise ill-defined in the unbounded and flat potentials typical of plateau models of inflation. This setup therefore allows us to compare the curvature distribution derived from both approaches, reverse and forward in time. Up to similar exponential tails, we find quantitative differences. In particular, in the classical-like limit of very large drift, the tails become Gaussian but only in the time-reversed picture. As a toy model of eternal inflation, we finally discuss the case of negative drift in which inflation never ends for many field trajectories. The forward approach becomes pathological whereas the reverse formalism gives back a finite curvature distribution with always exponential tails. All these differences end up being related to the very definition of the background which is ambiguous when a classical trajectory does not exist.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compaction function in stochastic inflation: a \texttt{FOREST} of type I and II primordial black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Stochastic binary tree method computes compaction function in inflation to distinguish type I/II PBH fluctuations, finding broader mass distributions and type-II dominance in quantum regimes of a toy model.

  2. Time-reversed stochastic inflation in the quantum well

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exact solution of time-reversed stochastic inflation in the quantum well yields curvature perturbation distributions with faster-decaying exponential tails than forward stochastic inflation.

  3. Stochastic constant-roll inflation beyond the hilltop with the spectral method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral solution of the Fokker-Planck operator for hilltop constant-roll inflation shows rare crossing trajectories dominate the mean, so the median yields a coarse-grained ΔN distribution whose exponential tail flat...

  4. Eigenvalue formulation of Stochastic Inflation and application to large perturbation generating inflationary features

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new eigenvalue method is introduced to compute the PDF of stochastic e-folds in inflation, recovering a known flat-potential result and analyzing constant-drift cases in narrow and broad well limits.

  5. Deviations from Gaussian White Noise in Stochastic Inflation

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Relaxing the sharp cutoff or the Bunch-Davies initial state in stochastic inflation makes the noise colored, and relaxing the initial state also makes it non-Gaussian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 58 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early st ate of the universe , JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682–685

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singula rity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

  3. [3]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizo n and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347–356

  4. [4]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole P roblems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389–393

  5. [5]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220–1223

  6. [6]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation , Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177–181

  7. [7]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535. – 22 –

  8. [8]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, The Vacuum energy and large scale structure of the universe, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 258–265

  9. [9]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Univers e Scenario and Generation of Perturbations , Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175–178

  10. [10]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110–1113

  11. [11]

    S. W. Hawking, The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflati onary Universe , Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 295

  12. [12]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner, Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 679

  13. [13]

    Chowdhury, J

    D. Chowdhury, J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Inflation after Planck: Judgement Day , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 083537 , [ 1902.03951]

  14. [14]

    W. E. East, M. Kleban, A. Linde and L. Senatore, Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe, JCAP 09 (2016) 010 , [ 1511.05143]

  15. [15]

    Clough, R

    K. Clough, R. Flauger and E. A. Lim, Robustness of Inflation to Large Tensor Perturbations , JCAP 05 (2018) 065 , [ 1712.07352]

  16. [16]

    Joana and S

    C. Joana and S. Clesse, Inhomogeneous preinflation across Hubble scales in full gen eral relativity, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083501 , [ 2011.12190]

  17. [17]

    Joana, Gravitational dynamics in Higgs inflation: Preinflation and preheating with an auxiliary field , Phys

    C. Joana, Gravitational dynamics in Higgs inflation: Preinflation and preheating with an auxiliary field , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 023504 , [ 2202.07604]

  18. [18]

    Joana, Beginning inflation in conformally curved spacetimes , Phys

    C. Joana, Beginning inflation in conformally curved spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 063534 , [ 2406.00811]

  19. [19]

    V. F. Mukhanov, L. A. Kofman and D. Y. Pogosian, Cosmological Perturbations in the Inflationary Universe , Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 427–432

  20. [20]

    V. F. Mukhanov, Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbati ons, Sov. Phys. JETP 67 (1988) 1297–1302

  21. [21]

    E. D. Stewart and D. H. Lyth, A more accurate analytic calculation of the spectrum of cosmological perturbations produced during inflation , Phys. Lett. B302 (1993) 171–175, [gr-qc/9302019]

  22. [22]

    Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results

    Planck collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 , [ 1807.06211]

  23. [23]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition , Phys. Dark Univ. 46 (2024) 101653, , [ 1303.3787]

  24. [24]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads , JCAP 07 (2024) 087 , [ 2404.10647]

  25. [25]

    Vilenkin, The Birth of Inflationary Universes , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, The Birth of Inflationary Universes , Phys. Rev. D27 (1983) 2848

  26. [26]

    A. D. Linde, Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflanationa ry universe , Physics Letters B 175 (Aug., 1986) 395–400

  27. [27]

    Winitzki, Predictions in eternal inflation , Lect

    S. Winitzki, Predictions in eternal inflation , Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 157–191 , [gr-qc/0612164]

  28. [28]

    Winitzki, A Volume-weighted measure for eternal inflation , Phys

    S. Winitzki, A Volume-weighted measure for eternal inflation , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 043501 , [0803.1300]

  29. [29]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Shortcomings of New Parametrizations of Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123521 , [ 1609.04739]. – 23 –

  30. [30]

    Ringeval, T

    C. Ringeval, T. Suyama, T. Takahashi, M. Yamaguchi and S. Yok oyama, Dark energy from primordial inflationary quantum fluctuations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 121301 , [ 1006.0368]

  31. [31]

    Kleban and M

    M. Kleban and M. Schillo, Spatial Curvature Falsifies Eternal Inflation , JCAP 06 (2012) 029 , [1202.5037]

  32. [32]

    Glavan, T

    D. Glavan, T. Prokopec and A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic dark energy from inflationary quantum fluctuations , Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 371 , [ 1710.07824]

  33. [33]

    Ringeval, T

    C. Ringeval, T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi, Large mass hierarchy from a small nonminimal coupling, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 123524 , [ 1903.03544]

  34. [34]

    Blachier, P

    B. Blachier, P. Auclair, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Spatial curvature from super-Hubble cosmological fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123510 , [ 2302.14530]

  35. [35]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Hawkins and F. Kuhnel, Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective , Phys. Rept. 1054 (2024) 1–68 , [ 2306.03903]

  36. [36]

    Vennin, Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes

    V. Vennin, Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes . PhD thesis, U. Paris-Saclay, 6, 2020. 2009.08715

  37. [37]

    Tada and V

    Y. Tada and V. Vennin, Statistics of coarse-grained cosmological fields in stocha stic inflation , JCAP 02 (2022) 021 , [ 2111.15280]

  38. [38]

    Tomberg, Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise , JCAP 04 (2023) 042 , [2210.17441]

    E. Tomberg, Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise , JCAP 04 (2023) 042 , [2210.17441]

  39. [39]

    Stamou and S

    I. Stamou and S. Clesse, Primordial black holes without fine-tuning from a light stoc hastic spectator field, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043522 , [ 2310.04174]

  40. [40]

    Stamou and S

    I. Stamou and S. Clesse, Can primordial black holes form in the standard model? , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 123501 , [ 2312.06873]

  41. [41]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin, Clustering of primordial black holes from quantum diffusion during inflation, JCAP 08 (2024) 026 , [ 2402.08642]

  42. [42]

    Tomberg and K

    E. Tomberg and K. Dimopoulos, Eternal inflation near inflection points: a challenge to primordial black hole models , 2507.15522

  43. [43]

    Animali, P

    C. Animali, P. Auclair, B. Blachier and V. Vennin, Harvesting primordial black holes from stochastic trees with FOREST , JCAP 05 (2025) 019 , [ 2501.05371]

  44. [44]

    Auclair, Forest: Fortran recursive exploration of stochastic trees , Apr., 2025

    P. Auclair, Forest: Fortran recursive exploration of stochastic trees , Apr., 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.15235932

  45. [45]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg, Effect of stochastic kicks on primordial black hole abundance and mass via the compaction function , 2510.09303

  46. [46]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) Stage in the Early Unive rse, in Field Theory, Quantum Gravity and Strings (H. J. de Vega & N. S´ anchez, ed.), vol. 246 of Lecture Notes in Physics , p. 107, Springer, 1986. DOI

  47. [47]

    A. S. Goncharov, A. D. Linde and V. F. Mukhanov, The Global Structure of the Inflationary Universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2 (1987) 561–591

  48. [48]

    Nambu and M

    Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki, Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model , Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 441–446

  49. [49]

    H. E. Kandrup, Stochastic inflation as a time dependent random walk , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 2245

  50. [50]

    Nakao, Y

    K.-i. Nakao, Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki, Stochastic Dynamics of New Inflation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 80 (1988) 1041

  51. [51]

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 6357–6368 , [ astro-ph/9407016]. – 24 –

  52. [52]

    A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde and A. Mezhlumian, From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1783–1826 , [ gr-qc/9306035]

  53. [53]

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, Nonlinear evolution of long-wavelength metric fluctuation s in inflationary models , Phys. Rev. D 42 (Dec, 1990) 3936–3962

  54. [54]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin, Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochasti c attractor? , JCAP 05 (2017) 045 , [ 1703.00447]

  55. [55]

    Finelli, G

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca and G. Vent uri, Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 044007 , [ 0808.1786]

  56. [56]

    Vennin and A

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky, Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation , Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 413 , [ 1506.04732]

  57. [57]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik and M. Sasaki, A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05 (2005) 004 , [ astro-ph/0411220]

  58. [58]

    G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard, Non-linear inflationary perturbations , JCAP 10 (2005) 006 , [ astro-ph/0405185]

  59. [59]

    Creminelli and M

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function , JCAP 10 (2004) 006 , [ astro-ph/0407059]

  60. [60]

    Langlois and F

    D. Langlois and F. Vernizzi, Evolution of non-linear cosmological perturbations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 091303 , [ astro-ph/0503416]

  61. [61]

    Sasaki and E

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the dens ity perturbations produced during inflation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996) 71–78 , [astro-ph/9507001]

  62. [62]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation , Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998) 763–782 , [ gr-qc/9801017]

  63. [63]

    Wands, K

    D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle, A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043527 , [astro-ph/0003278]

  64. [64]

    D. H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez, The Inflationary prediction for primordial non-Gaussianit y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 121302 , [ astro-ph/0504045]

  65. [65]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tada and T. Takesako, A new algorithm for calculating the curvature perturbations in stochastic inflation , JCAP 12 (2013) 036 , [ 1308.4754]

  66. [66]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki and Y. Tada, Non-perturbative approach for curvature perturbations in stochastic δN formalism, JCAP 10 (2014) 030 , [ 1405.2187]

  67. [67]

    Ando and V

    K. Ando and V. Vennin, Power spectrum in stochastic inflation , JCAP 04 (2021) 057 , [2012.02031]

  68. [68]

    Mizuguchi, T

    Y. Mizuguchi, T. Murata and Y. Tada, STOLAS: STOchastic LAttice Simulation of cosmic inflation, JCAP 12 (2024) 050 , [ 2405.10692]

  69. [69]

    Y. L. Launay, G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard, Stochastic inflation in general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 123523 , [ 2401.08530]

  70. [70]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes , JCAP 10 (2017) 046 , [ 1707.00537]

  71. [71]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido and V. Vennin, The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2020) 029 , [ 1912.05399]

  72. [72]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin, Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling , JCAP 02 (2023) 043 , [ 2210.03812]. – 25 –

  73. [73]

    Calder´ on-Figueroa and D

    J. Calder´ on-Figueroa and D. Seery, Stochastic instantons and the tail of the inflationary density perturbation, 2510.04707

  74. [74]

    Cruces, S

    D. Cruces, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, δn formalism: A new formulation for the probability density of the curvature perturbation , 2505.24590

  75. [75]

    Tada and V

    Y. Tada and V. Vennin, Squeezed bispectrum in the δN formalism: local observer effect in field space, JCAP 02 (2017) 021 , [ 1609.08876]

  76. [76]

    Shibata and M

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki, Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulatio n and computation in numerical relativity , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 084002 , [ gr-qc/9905064]

  77. [77]

    Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the sha pe of the cosmological perturbations, Phys

    I. Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the sha pe of the cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123524 , [ 1809.02127]

  78. [78]

    Harada, H

    T. Harada, H. Iizuka, Y. Koga and C.-M. Yoo, Geometrical origin for the compaction function for primordial black hole formation , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 023537 , [ 2409.05544]

  79. [79]

    Handley, Primordial power spectra for curved inflating universes , Phys

    W. Handley, Primordial power spectra for curved inflating universes , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123517 , [ 1907.08524]

  80. [80]

    M. I. Letey, Z. Shumaylov, F. J. Agocs, W. J. Handley, M. P. Ho bson and A. N. Lasenby, Quantum initial conditions for curved inflating universes , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 123502 , [2211.17248]

Showing first 80 references.