Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Exponentially accelerated relaxation and quantum Mpemba effect in open quantum systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A unitary that reorders a quantum state's spectrum kills the slowest decay mode and provokes the quantum Mpemba effect in Davies-map open systems.

desk verdict Genuinely new permutation-based protocol for QME in Davies maps, with solid HSD/QRE proofs — but the main-text 'any initial state' claim silently assumes a complex off-diagonal slowest mode. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.07561 v3 pith:KFDTT3JQ submitted 2025-12-08 quant-ph

Emerson Lima Caldas , Diego Paiva Pires This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumMpembaeffectDaviesmapsopensystemsrelaxationaccelerationpermutationunitariesLiouvillianspectralsuppressionHilbert-Schmidtdistancetrace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for any initial state of a d-level open system governed by a Davies map, a three-step unitary — diagonalize the state, permute its eigenvalues, rotate back to the Hamiltonian basis — makes the dressed state exactly orthogonal to the slowest Liouvillian mode, for every permutation. Since that overlap vanishes, the slowest exponential decay channel is shut off and relaxation is exponentially accelerated. The paper also proves that a permutation always exists that maximizes the dressed state's distance from the steady state under the Hilbert-Schmidt distance, quantum relative entropy, and trace distance. Because the transformed state both starts farther from equilibrium and decays faster, the two relaxation curves cross at some time t_QME and the state that was initially farther reaches equilibrium sooner. A sympathetic reader should care because the protocol is constructive, numerically cheap, and demonstrated on two-level systems and on five-spin Ising and XXZ chains weakly coupled to a thermal bath.

What carries the argument

The central object is the unitary U=U1PπΛ†, composed of the eigenvector matrix of the initial state (Λ), a permutation matrix Pπ, and the eigenvector matrix of the Hamiltonian (U1). Its effect is to express the initial state in its own eigenbasis, reorder the eigenvalues, and rotate the result into the energy basis. The argument turns on the structural fact that for Davies maps the slowest left eigenmode becomes a one-entry off-diagonal matrix |j0⟩⟨l0| after rotating to the energy basis; a permutation only permutes diagonal entries, so the overlap vanishes identically. The distance-maximizing permutation is selected by the rearrangement inequality: pairing the smallest eigenvalue of the stat

What would settle it

Take a qubit undergoing pure T1 relaxation (jump operator σ−), whose slowest Liouvillian mode is the Hermitian diagonal population difference ρ11−ρ22 with a real eigenvalue. There L2′ is diagonal, so the overlap Tr(L2UρU†) cannot be zeroed by any permutation matrix; numerically the exponential tail set by the real eigenvalue persists and no genuine Mpemba crossover appears. This system would falsify the claim if it is read as applying to all Davies maps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For Davies maps whose slowest decay is a complex-conjugate eigenvalue pair, the slowest left eigenmatrix L2 of the Liouvillian can be rotated to a single off-diagonal matrix |j0⟩⟨l0| in the Hamiltonian eigenbasis. The paper's unitary U=U1PπΛ† transforms an arbitrary initial state into U1PπDPπ†U1†, where D holds the state's eigenvalues. The overlap that controls slowest-mode excitation, Tr(L2UρU†), then becomes ⟨l0|PπDPπ†|j0⟩, which is zero for every permutation matrix because permutation only rearranges the diagonal entries of D. This suppresses the slowest mode and accelerates relaxation exponentially. Independently, the paper proves that some permutation makes the dressed state strictly fa

Load-bearing premise

The main-text guarantee assumes the slowest-decaying Liouvillian mode is a non-Hermitian off-diagonal eigenoperator coming from a complex-conjugate eigenvalue pair; if the slowest mode is instead a real, diagonal population mode — possible for Davies maps — the permutation unitary does not suppress it, and the genuine quantum Mpemba effect is not guaranteed (the paper treats that case only in an appendix with a different, angle-tuned unitary).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any Davies map with a complex slowest eigenpair, the exponential relaxation tail is cut from e^{tλ2} to e^{tλ4}, so the longest-lived mode no longer controls the approach to equilibrium.
  • A genuine quantum Mpemba effect — an initially farther state crossing and then permanently beating a closer one — is guaranteed for Hilbert-Schmidt distance, quantum relative entropy, and trace distance once the spectrum is sorted in the appropriate order.
  • The protocol needs only the spectra of the initial state and the Hamiltonian plus a classical sorting step, which keeps the numerical cost low even for many-body systems such as the five-spin transverse-field Ising and XXZ chains shown.
  • The same permutation unitary also suppresses every higher off-diagonal eigenmode that can be triangularized, so the acceleration is not hostage to details of the second eigenvalue alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's note: these bullets are extensions beyond what the paper claims.
  • Because the unitary only changes the basis in which the same spectrum is expressed, the Mpemba advantage is bought without altering the state's eigenvalues; this suggests the underlying resource is alignment with the dissipative modes of the bath rather than the state's information content, a distinction that could be probed by resource-theoretic measures.
  • The crossover time t_QME is a concrete, parameter-dependent observable: an experiment could prepare two copies of a system whose initial spectra are permutations of each other, run identical Davies-map dynamics, and verify that the sorted, farther state crosses and relaxes faster.
  • The main-text scope is limited to complex-pair slowest modes; the appendix's angle-tuned variant for real diagonal slowest modes hints that the operative criterion is the shape of the slow mode in the energy basis, so a unified version would classify Davies maps by whether their slowest left eigenmatrix is off-diagonal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unitary protocol U = U1 Pπ Λ† for Davies-map open quantum systems. For a probe state ρ(t0) = ΛDΛ†, the unitary diagonalizes the state, permutes its eigenvalues with Pπ, and rotates to the Hamiltonian eigenbasis with U1. The authors claim that, when the slowest Liouvillian mode is a complex off-diagonal pair, the dressed state has vanishing overlap with that mode for every permutation (Eq. (10)), giving exponentially accelerated relaxation. They also prove, using the Birkhoff–von Neumann theorem and the rearrangement inequality, that a permutation exists which maximizes the Hilbert-Schmidt distance, quantum relative entropy, and trace distance between the dressed state and the thermal steady state. They conclude that these two properties yield a genuine quantum Mpemba effect. Analytic results for a two-level system and numerical results for the transverse-field Ising and XXZ chains are presented, and Appendix A gives a separate construction for the case of a real Hermitian slowest mode.

Significance. The construction is explicit and potentially useful: it reduces the engineering of accelerated relaxation and of the genuine quantum Mpemba effect to a spectral rearrangement of the initial state, with no fitting parameters and with low numerical cost. The proofs in Appendix B are standard but correctly deployed, and the numerical demonstrations for the two spin models support the claim in the covered regime. The main reservation is that the headline theorem is stated more broadly than the proof supports: the central suppression step Eq. (10) relies on the slowest mode being a single off-diagonal non-Hermitian operator, which is a structural fact for complex-conjugate coherence modes but not for real diagonal population modes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (10); Sec. IV] The key identity Tr(L2 U ρ(t0) U†) = ⟨l0|PπDPπ†|j0⟩ = 0 requires L′2 = U1† L2 U1 to be the single off-diagonal matrix |j0⟩⟨l0|. This is the structure of a complex-conjugate pair of coherence eigenmodes of a Davies map, but not the structure of a real, diagonal population mode. For a diagonal L′2 = diag(α1,...,αd), the overlap is Σ_i α_i λ_{π(i)}, which is generically nonzero. The main text does not state the complex-pair condition as a theorem hypothesis; Eq. (5) builds it into the spectral decomposition, and Sec. IV concludes a genuine QME "for any initial state." Appendix A acknowledges the real-mode case but uses a different unitary V(θ) and a critical angle, recovering Ref. [13] rather than the main protocol. This is load-bearing for the headline claim and should be fixed by stating the scope explicitly in the abstract and theorem, or by extending the permutation construction to diag
  2. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (15)-(16)] The paper asserts that conditions (i) and (ii) guarantee a genuine QME, but the existence of the finite-time crossover is not proved. One needs: (a) the original state has nonzero overlap with the slowest mode, so D(ρ(t),R1) contains a component decaying as e^{-t|Re λ2|}; (b) the dressed state has zero overlap with that mode and nonzero overlap with the remaining modes; and (c) D(ρ′(t0),R1) > D(ρ(t0),R1). Under (a)-(c), D(ρ′(t),R1)/D(ρ(t),R1) → 0 as t → ∞, and continuity gives a last crossing time. As written, the argument is only verbal and these hypotheses are not stated. Please add this as a short lemma.
  3. [Sec. IV A and Appendix B, Eq. (B13)] The HSD proof establishes Tr(PπDPπ†Σ) ≤ Σ_l ε_l Tr(A_l D A_l† Σ), not necessarily the strict inequality used in Eq. (18). If ρ(t0) is already ordered optimally, the best permutation gives equality and condition (15) fails; similarly, if ρ(t0) = R1, no QME is possible. The "for any initial state" statement should be qualified to initial states that are not already optimal and not stationary, or the strictness should be analyzed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (29)] The subscript in D_Tr should be D_TD; as written it introduces a new symbol.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption labels panel (a) as "trace distance, D_HSD(ρ(t),R1)"; the axis in the figure is D_TD. The HSD label should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. IV B] There is a typo: "ideia" should be "idea." Also, in Eq. (24) the symbol ε_l is used both for convex coefficients and for Hamiltonian eigenvalues; please clarify the notation.
  4. [Sec. IV C] The sentence introducing Eq. (27) cites a lower bound from Ref. [56]; it is worth stating explicitly that D_TD(u↑,v↓) is the maximum over all permutations of the diagonal entries, since this is what justifies the existence of Pπ attaining it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central construction is a direct algebraic proof, and the only self-citation is a non-load-bearing formula.

full rationale

The paper's protocol U = U1 Pπ Λ† is not fitted to the target. Equation (10) is an explicit algebraic identity: with L′2 = |j0⟩⟨l0| and Pπ D Pπ† diagonal, ⟨l0|Pπ D Pπ†|j0⟩ = 0 for j0 ≠ l0. This is a construction, not a restatement of the conclusion. The distance-maximization inequalities (19), (25), and (29) follow from the rearrangement inequality, the Birkhoff–von Neumann theorem, and the Markham bound, all external benchmarks; they are not derived from the desired QME crossover. No parameter is adjusted to force the crossover; rather, the crossover is implied by the surviving slower mode λ4 dominating the dressed evolution while λ2 dominates the undressed one. The only self-citation, Ref. [57] for the single-qubit quantum relative entropy formula in Eq. (40), is a parameter-free auxiliary expression used for numerical evaluation and is not load-bearing. Appendix A explicitly treats the case of a real slowest decay mode with a different unitary V(θ), so the main text's complex-pair slow-mode condition is a scope limitation rather than a circular reduction: it does not make the headline result equivalent to an input by definition. Any concern that the main-text claim overreaches for real slow modes is a correctness/scope issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (i) the Davies-map spectral structure — off-diagonal eigenmodes are single projectors |j⟩⟨l| — and (ii) the assumption that the slowest mode is a complex pair. Both are domain assumptions about the model, not extra entities or fitted constants. Standard tools (Birkhoff–von Neumann, rearrangement inequality, Markham bound) are invoked as external math. No invented physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Under the Davies map, the off-diagonal sector of the Liouvillian has eigenmatrices L'_s that are single projectors |j0⟩⟨l0| in the energy basis (up to U1 similarity), so that Tr(L_s ρ') = ⟨l0| Pπ D Pπ† |j0⟩.
    Invoked in Sec. III to prove Eq. (10); established heuristically from the block structure of Ξ in Sec. III (Eqs. (11)-(14)) but not proven in full for general Davies maps; relies on the detailed-balance form of the jump operators (Eqs. (3)-(4)).
  • domain assumption The slowest nonzero eigenvalue(s) of the Liouvillian form a complex conjugate pair λ2, λ3=λ2* (ordering 0=|λ1| < |Re λ2| ≤ |Re λ3| ≤ ...), so that Eq. (5) has the displayed form.
    Used in Sec. II/III to justify that suppressing the off-diagonal mode accelerates relaxation; not stated as a restriction. If the slowest mode is real, the main U=U1PπΛ† does not suppress it (Appendix A treats that case separately).
  • standard math Birkhoff–von Neumann theorem: any doubly stochastic matrix is a convex combination of permutation matrices.
    Used in Appendix B, Eq. (B9), to express Tr(U'DU'†Σ) as Σ_l ϵ_l Tr(A_l D A_l† Σ).
  • standard math Rearrangement inequality (Hardy–Littlewood–Pólya): Σ_j α_j λ_{π(j)} is minimized when α and λ are oppositely sorted.
    Used in Sec. IV A/B to prove the existence of the maximizing permutation.
  • standard math Markham et al. trace-distance bound: D_TD(ρ,R1) ≤ D_TD(u↑,v↓) where u↑ and v↓ are the oppositely sorted spectra (Ref. [56]).
    Used in Sec. IV C to argue the dressed-state TD exceeds the original; the paper's application to a fixed-order Σ is where the proof misstatement occurs.
  • domain assumption The Davies-map dissipators and Hamiltonian commute, ensuring the simultaneous block structure used in Eq. (11).
    Standard property of Davies maps (Refs. [43,44]), invoked in Sec. II/III for the Liouvillian vectorization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponentially accelerated relaxation and quantum Mpemba effect in open quantum systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KFDTT3JQ

@misc{pith2026251207561,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponentially accelerated relaxation and quantum Mpemba effect in open quantum systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KFDTT3JQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.07561}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum Mpemba effect in the relaxation of open quantum systems whose effective dynamics is described by Davies maps. We introduce a class of unitary transformations constructed from permutation matrices that, when applied to an initial state, (i) suppress the slowest decaying modes of the nonunitary dynamics and (ii) maximize the state's distinguishability from the steady state. The first condition ensures exponentially faster convergence to equilibrium, while the second implies that a quantum system initially further from equilibrium can approach it more rapidly than one that starts closer. This protocol thus realizes a genuine Mpemba effect, and its simulation requires low computational effort. We prove that, for any initial state, there exists a permutation matrix that maximizes its distance from equilibrium with respect to a chosen information-theoretic distinguishability measure. We illustrate our findings for a two-level system, as well as for the nonunitary dynamics of the transverse-field Ising chain and the XXZ chain, each weakly coupled to a bosonic thermal bath. In these cases, the quantum Mpemba effect is demonstrated using the Hilbert-Schmidt distance, quantum relative entropy, and trace distance. Overall, our results provide a versatile framework for engineering a genuine quantum Mpemba effect in Markovian open quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.07561 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online) Overview of the quantum Mpemba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Color online) The quantum Mpemba effect in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online) The quantum Mpemba effect in the dynamics of the transverse field Ising (TFI) model with open [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online) The quantum Mpemba effect in the dynamics of the XXZ model with open boundary conditions [see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strong Quantum Mpemba Effect from Exact Slow-Mode Selection in Constrained Rydberg Chains

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Translation-invariant states with Tr(Hρ0)=0 remove the exact H slow mode of the dephased Liouvillian and thus relax asymptotically faster than thermal states, yielding a strong quantum Mpemba effect in constrained Ryd...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [13]

    Lindblad dissipative dynamics in the presence of phase coexistence,

    A. Nava and M. Fabrizio, “Lindblad dissipative dynamics in the presence of phase coexistence,” Phys. Rev. B100, 125102 (2019)

    2019

  2. [20]

    Quantum Mpemba effects from symmetry perspectives,

    H. Yu, S. Liu, and S.-X. Zhang, “Quantum Mpemba effects from symmetry perspectives,” AAPPS Bull.35, 17 (2025)

    2025

  3. [1]

    Book I, Chapter XII,

    Aristotle, “Book I, Chapter XII,” inMeteorologica, edited by H. D. P. Lee (Harvard University Press, Cam- bridge, Massachusetts, 1952) pp. 79–86

    1952

  4. [2]

    In particular, we verify that L1 =|0⟩⟨0|+|1⟩⟨1|is the identity matrix, whileR 1 = p+|0⟩⟨0|+p −|1⟩⟨1|is the steady state of the dynamics, withp ∓ = (1/2)e ∓δ/(2kB T) sech(δ/(2kBT)). It can be proved thatp − =e −ε1/(kB T) /Z, andp + =e −ε2/(kB T) /Z are Boltzmann weights related to a thermal state at fi- nite temperatureT, withZ= Tr(e −H/kB T ) being the pa...

  5. [3]

    E. B. Mpemba and D. G. Osborne, “Cool?” Phys. Educ. 4, 172 (1969)

    1969

  6. [4]

    The Freezing of Hot and Cold Water,

    G. S. Kell, “The Freezing of Hot and Cold Water,” Am. J. Phys.37, 564 (1969)

    1969

  7. [5]

    Conformation Directed Mpemba Effect on Polylactide Crystallization,

    C. Hu, J. Li, S. Huang, H. Li, C. Luo, J. Chen, S. Jiang, and L. An, “Conformation Directed Mpemba Effect on Polylactide Crystallization,” Crys. Growth Des.18, 5757 (2018)

    2018

  8. [6]

    Overtaking while approaching equilibrium,

    P. Chaddah, S. Dash, K. Kumar, and A. Baner- jee, “Overtaking while approaching equilibrium,” arXiv:1011.3598

    arXiv

Show all 61 references
  1. [7]

    Exponentially faster cool- ing in a colloidal system,

    A. Kumar and J. Bechhoefer, “Exponentially faster cool- ing in a colloidal system,” Nature584, 64 (2020)

    2020

  2. [8]

    Questioning the Mpemba effect: Hot water does not cool more quickly than cold,

    H. C. Burridge and P. F. Linden, “Questioning the Mpemba effect: Hot water does not cool more quickly than cold,” Sci. Rep.6, 37665 (2016)

    2016

  3. [9]

    A fresh understanding of the Mpemba effect,

    J. Bechhoefer, A. Kumar, and R. Ch´ etrite, “A fresh understanding of the Mpemba effect,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 534 (2021)

    2021

  4. [10]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the Markovian Mpemba effect and its inverse,

    Z. Lu and O. Raz, “Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the Markovian Mpemba effect and its inverse,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 5083 (2017)

    2017

  5. [11]

    Mpemba Index and Anomalous Relaxation,

    I. Klich, O. Raz, O. Hirschberg, and M. Vucelja, “Mpemba Index and Anomalous Relaxation,” Phys. Rev. X9, 021060 (2019)

    2019

  6. [12]

    Mpemba meets Newton: Exploring the Mpemba and Kovacs effects in the time-delayed cooling law,

    A. Santos, “Mpemba meets Newton: Exploring the Mpemba and Kovacs effects in the time-delayed cooling law,” Phys. Rev. E109, 044149 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    Exponen- tially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems Through the Mpemba Effect,

    F. Carollo, A. Lasanta, and I. Lesanovsky, “Exponen- tially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems Through the Mpemba Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060401 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    Accelerat- ing the approach of dissipative quantum spin systems to- wards stationarity through global spin rotations,

    S. Kochsiek, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, “Accelerat- ing the approach of dissipative quantum spin systems to- wards stationarity through global spin rotations,” Phys. Rev. A106, 012207 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    Accelerating Quantum Relaxation via Temporary Reset: A Mpemba-Inspired Approach,

    R. Bao and Z. Hou, “Accelerating Quantum Relaxation via Temporary Reset: A Mpemba-Inspired Approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150403 (2025)

    2025

  10. [17]

    Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in a Quantum Dot with Reservoirs,

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, “Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in a Quantum Dot with Reservoirs,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    The quantum Mpemba effects,

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, “The quantum Mpemba effects,” Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 451 (2025)

    2025

  12. [19]

    Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects,

    G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, “Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects,” arXiv:2502.01758

  13. [21]

    Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect,

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, “Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Mpemba Effects in Open Nonequilibrium Quantum Systems,

    A. Nava and R. Egger, “Mpemba Effects in Open Nonequilibrium Quantum Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136302 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mpemba effects in nonequilib- rium open quantum systems,

    X. Wang and J. Wang, “Mpemba effects in nonequilib- rium open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033330 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Pontus-Mpemba Effects,

    A. Nava and R. Egger, “Pontus-Mpemba Effects,” Phys. 14 Rev. Lett.135, 140404 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Speeding up Pontus-Mpemba effects via dynamical phase transi- tions,

    A. Nava, R. Egger, B. Dey, and D. Giuliano, “Speeding up Pontus-Mpemba effects via dynamical phase transi- tions,” arXiv:2509.09366

  18. [26]

    Microscopic Origin of the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems,

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Mur- ciano, and B. Bertini, “Microscopic Origin of the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010401 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking,

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, “Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking,” Nat. Com- mun.14, 2036 (2023)

  20. [28]

    Symme- try Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect in Sym- metric Random Circuits,

    S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin, and S.-X. Zhang, “Symme- try Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect in Sym- metric Random Circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140405 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Entangle- ment asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two- dimensional free-fermion systems,

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, “Entangle- ment asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two- dimensional free-fermion systems,” Phys. Rev. B110, 085126 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Quantum Mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states,

    F. Ares, V. Vitale, and S. Murciano, “Quantum Mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states,” Phys. Rev. B111, 104312 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: Entan- glement, symmetries, and the quantum Mpemba effect,

    S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese, and F. Ares, “Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: Entan- glement, symmetries, and the quantum Mpemba effect,” Phys. Rev. A111, 043304 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Symmetry breaking in chaotic many-body quantum systems at fi- nite temperature,

    A. Russotto, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, “Symmetry breaking in chaotic many-body quantum systems at fi- nite temperature,” Phys. Rev. E112, L032101 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    A resource theoretical uni- fication of Mpemba effects: Classical and quantum,

    A. Summer, M. Moroder, L. P. Bettmann, X. Turkeshi, I. Marvian, and J. Goold, “A resource theoretical uni- fication of Mpemba effects: Classical and quantum,” arXiv:2507.16976

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mpemba Effect in Quantum Complexity,

    S. Aditya, A. Summer, P. Sierant, and X. Turkeshi, “Mpemba Effect in Quantum Complexity,” arXiv:2509.22176

  27. [35]

    Robustness of the quantum Mpemba effect against state-preparation er- rors,

    M. Mackinnon and M. Paternostro, “Robustness of the quantum Mpemba effect against state-preparation er- rors,” arXiv:2511.14837

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    A simpler probe of the quantum Mpemba effect in closed systems,

    F. Ares, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, “A simpler probe of the quantum Mpemba effect in closed systems,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58, 445302 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Information geometry ap- proach to quantum stochastic thermodynamics,

    L. P. Bettmann and J. Goold, “Information geometry ap- proach to quantum stochastic thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. E111, 014133 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Observing the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations,

    L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Mur- ciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Calabrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, “Observing the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect,

    J. Zhang, G. Xia, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xie, W.-B. Su, W. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, P.-X. Chen, W. Li, H. Jing, and Y.-L. Zhou, “Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect,” Nat. Commun.16, 301 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Inverse Mpemba Effect Demonstrated on a Single Trapped Ion Qubit,

    S. Aharony Shapira, Y. Shapira, J. Markov, G. Teza, N. Akerman, O. Raz, and R. Ozeri, “Inverse Mpemba Effect Demonstrated on a Single Trapped Ion Qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010403 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Experimental observa- tion and application of the genuine quantum Mpemba effect,

    B. P. Schnepper, J. L. D. de Oliveira, C. H. S. Vieira, K. Zawadzki, and R. M. Serra, “Experimental observa- tion and application of the genuine quantum Mpemba effect,” arXiv:2511.14552

  34. [42]

    Generators of dynamical semigroups,

    E. B. Davies, “Generators of dynamical semigroups,” J. Funct. Anal.34, 421 (1979)

    1979

  35. [43]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups,

    H. Spohn, “Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups,” J. Math. Phys.19, 1227 (1978)

    1978

  37. [45]

    Quantum jumps and entropy production,

    H.-P. Breuer, “Quantum jumps and entropy production,” Phys. Rev. A68, 032105 (2003)

    2003

  38. [46]

    Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems,

    T. Prosen, “Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems,” New J. Phys.10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    A tensor network framework for Lindbladian spectra and steady states,

    P. Westhoff, M. Moroder, U. Schollw¨ ock, and S. Paeckel, “A tensor network framework for Lindbladian spectra and steady states,” arXiv:2509.07709

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,

    Jamio lkowski, “Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,” Rep. Math. Phys.3, 275 (1972)

    1972

  41. [49]

    Completely positive linear maps on com- plex matrices,

    M.-D. Choi, “Completely positive linear maps on com- plex matrices,” Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  42. [50]

    A General Strategy for Real- izing Mpemba Effects in Open Quantum Systems,

    Y. Liu and Y. Wang, “A General Strategy for Real- izing Mpemba Effects in Open Quantum Systems,” arXiv:2511.04354

  43. [51]

    Entanglement measures and the Hilbert- Schmidt distance,

    M. Ozawa, “Entanglement measures and the Hilbert- Schmidt distance,” Phys. Lett. A268, 158 (2000)

    2000

  44. [52]

    G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. P´ olya,Inequal- ities, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    1988

  45. [53]

    Conditional expectation in an operator al- gebra. IV. Entropy and information,

    H. Umegaki, “Conditional expectation in an operator al- gebra. IV. Entropy and information,” Kodai Math. Sem. Rep.14, 59 (1962)

    1962

  46. [54]

    The role of relative entropy in quantum in- formation theory,

    V. Vedral, “The role of relative entropy in quantum in- formation theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 197 (2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    Relative en- tropy in quantum information theory,

    B. Schumacher and M. D. Westmoreland, “Relative en- tropy in quantum information theory,” arXiv:quant- ph/0004045

  48. [56]

    Nielsen and I

    M. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    Quantum state discrimination: A ge- ometric approach,

    D. Markham, J. A. Miszczak, Z. Pucha la, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, “Quantum state discrimination: A ge- ometric approach,” Phys. Rev. A77, 042111 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Quantum speed limits based on Jensen-Shannon and Jeffreys divergences for general physical processes,

    J. F. de Sousa and D. P. Pires, “Quantum speed limits based on Jensen-Shannon and Jeffreys divergences for general physical processes,” arXiv:2509.20347

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Artin,Algebra, 2nd ed

    M. Artin,Algebra, 2nd ed. (Pearson Modern Classic, 2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Majorization, doubly stochastic matrices, and comparison of eigenvalues,

    T. Ando, “Majorization, doubly stochastic matrices, and comparison of eigenvalues,” Linear Algebra Appl.118, 163 (1989)

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.