Holography of quarter-BPS AdS bubbles

Anthony Houppe; Bogdan Ganchev

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Holography of quarter-BPS AdS bubbles

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the CFT state dual to quarter-BPS AdS bubble geometries through quadratic order, including a subleading 1/N correction that produces a non-protected three-point function.

desk verdict Solid bulk work and a genuinely new CFT-side ansatz, but the headline claim of reconstruction “from supergravity alone” is not earned: one 1/N coefficient is fixed by an imported finite-N assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.07767 v2 pith:4IVUBOBW submitted 2025-12-08 hep-th

Bogdan Ganchev , Anthony Houppe This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords AdS/CFTquarter-BPSbubblinggeometriesN=4superYang-Millsholographicdictionarychiralprimariesthree-pointfunctions1/Ncorrections

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to extend the holographic dictionary beyond the well-understood half-BPS sector by identifying the CFT state that describes a family of quarter-BPS 'bubble' geometries in AdS5. Working perturbatively to quadratic order in the deformation, it derives the state as a specific combination of half-BPS double-trace operators and the unique [2,0,2] quarter-BPS operator, with the quarter-BPS coefficient fixed by matching protected three-point functions to supergravity. This provides the first bulk-to-boundary matching for 1/4-BPS geometries beyond linearized order, including a subleading 1/N correction. The payoff is an explicit example of a correlator involving quarter-BPS operators that differs from its free-field value, showing it is not protected. If correct, it establishes that classical supergravity data can reconstruct protected quarter-BPS operators with their 1/N corrections.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through a decoupled form of the BPS equations for the five-dimensional consistent truncation, written in terms of fields sigma_+ and sigma_- satisfying xi d_xi (xi d_xi sigma_±) - 4 C xi^2 sinh sigma_± = 0, which organize the perturbative expansion. The matching uses the holographic dictionary: asymptotic expansions of the supergravity fields give expectation values of dimension-2 chiral primaries and R-charges, and a non-renormalization theorem protects the corresponding three-point functions. The central identity is the operator O_1/4 = TrX^2 TrY^2 - (TrXY)^2 - (2/N)(TrXXYY - TrXYXY), whose unique [2,0,2] representation enters the quadratic state; imposing that the matchi

What would settle it

Compute the quadratic coefficient of O_1/4 in the heavy state by an independent method, for example a direct evaluation of the relevant three-point function in N=4 super Yang-Mills at small but finite N, and check whether the coefficient is -beta1 beta2 / (3N); a different value would overturn the finite-N identification. Alternatively, solve the wave equation in the bubble background and check whether the predicted unprotected three-point function actually differs from its free-theory value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the state dual to the 1/4-BPS AdS bubble geometries, to quadratic order in the deformation parameter epsilon, is |psi> = N [1 - 1/2 epsilon (beta1 TrX^2 + beta2 TrY^2) + 1/8 epsilon^2 (beta1 TrX^2 + beta2 TrY^2)^2 - 1/(3N) epsilon^2 beta1 beta2 (TrXXYY - TrXYXY) + O(epsilon^3)] |0>. Equivalently, the quadratic piece splits into a half-BPS double-trace part and the unique [2,0,2] quarter-BPS operator O_1/4 with coefficient beta1 beta2 / 6. The paper argues this is the first 1/4-BPS geometry/state matching beyond linearized order, and that the 1/N coefficient of the quarter-BPS operator - previously fixed at weak coupling by diagonalizing the one-loop dilatation opera

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the holographic matching equations, verified at large N, continue to hold at finite N (at least to first 1/N^2 order); this unproven extrapolation fixes the coefficient and sign of the quarter-BPS operator in the quadratic state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The state (4.32)/(4.33) is a concrete prediction for the CFT dual of a 1/4-BPS bubble, testable at quadratic order.
The 1/N coefficient in the quarter-BPS piece is determined by supergravity and agrees with the weak-coupling one-loop diagonalization, so the protected dimension survives at strong coupling.
The correlator involving two quarter-BPS and one half-BPS operators computed in the supergravity regime differs from the free-theory result, giving an explicit unprotected quarter-BPS observable.
The paper states that Heavy-Heavy-Light-Light and Light-Light-Light-Light correlators with quarter-BPS operators become computable by solving wave equations in these backgrounds, which would be a direct next application.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the finite-N extrapolation is valid, the same method could fix higher-order terms in the heavy state and determine whether the quarter-BPS component remains the only non-half-BPS contribution beyond quadratic order.
The decoupled BPS form and the matching strategy may carry over to spinning 1/4-BPS solutions and to 1/8- or 1/16-BPS geometries within the truncation, potentially producing microstate data relevant to black holes.
A direct independent check would be to compute the O(epsilon^2) state from the coherent-state integral over unitary matrices in a suitable limit and compare coefficients; the present paper leaves that matrix-integral route unresolved.
The unprotected three-point function provides a sharp target for a future stringy or bootstrap computation outside the supergravity regime.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The bulk part is genuinely good. The new ansatz decouples the BPS equations (even if the equations themselves are the same as the microstrata ones from [9]), and the perturbative-plus-numerical construction is thorough: energy matches J1+J2, and the numerics converge to 10^-50. The holographic extraction of dimension-2 chiral primary expectation values and R-charges is clean and solution-independent, and the simplest cross-checks all pass. That part deserves a serious referee.

The genuinely new CFT-side result is the explicit state (4.32)/(4.33) — the quadratic combination of half-BPS double-traces plus the unique [2,0,2] quarter-BPS operator with an explicit 1/N coefficient. That is a real step beyond the coherent-state ansätze in the literature, and it yields a concrete non-protected three-point function as paydirt.

The soft spot is exactly where the abstract oversells. Section 4.3 leaves one coefficient (γ̃7 and a sign δ) unfixed by the holographic data. The dimension-2 vevs and R-charges determine everything else, but the 1/N mixing of O1/4 is fixed only by imposing either that O(2) decomposes into half-BPS double-traces plus O1/4, or that the finite-N matching equations hold at first 1/N² order. Both are inputs imported from outside the supergravity data. The authors are transparent about this — they even note that a dimension-4 expectation value would fix it — but they do not compute it. The consistency check (4.37) only verifies orthogonality; it does not determine the coefficient. So the abstract’s “fully reconstructed from supergravity alone” is not supported. The result is conditional, and the paper says so in the body.

Is this a fatal problem? No. The state is very likely correct under the stated assumptions, and the paper is honest about what is assumed. But the central claim is weaker than the abstract implies, and a referee should push on exactly this point: either prove the finite-N matching for 1/4-BPS states (even in a simplified setting) or compute the dimension-4 vev that closes the system. Until one of those is done, the 1/N coefficient should be flagged as assumption-dependent.

For whom: anyone working on AdS5/CFT4 holography, heavy states, or BPS correlators. It deserves a serious referee and a revised version that recalibrates the abstract. I would cite the bulk construction and the state ansatz, with the caveat about the coefficient.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a class of static 1/4-BPS AdS bubble solutions in a five-dimensional consistent truncation of type IIB supergravity, with the goal of identifying their dual heavy states in N=4 SYM beyond linear order. The authors introduce a new ansatz that decouples the BPS equations (Sec. 3.4), construct the geometries perturbatively to 12th order and numerically (Secs. 3.6, 5), and use KK holography to extract the expectation values of dimension-2 chiral primaries and R-charges (Sec. 4.1). In the CFT, they propose a perturbative ansatz for the heavy state and match free-field Wick-contraction results to the holographic data. This yields the claimed quadratic-order state (4.32)-(4.33), expressed in terms of half-BPS double-traces and the lightest quarter-BPS operator O1/4 with an explicit subleading 1/N coefficient, together with an associated non-protected three-point function. The central claim is that protected quarter-BPS operators, including subleading 1/N corrections, can be fully reconstructed from supergravity alone.

Significance. If established, this would be the first explicit matching of 1/4-BPS geometries to N=4 SYM states beyond the linearized approximation, including subleading 1/N structure, and would provide a useful template for heavy-state holography in AdS5. The paper has concrete strengths: the decoupling of the BPS equations (Sec. 3.4), the clean derivation of the holographic vevs (4.19)-(4.21), the high-order perturbative expansion, and the numerical checks with residuals of order 10^-50 and consistency E=J1+J2. The advertised non-protected three-point function is a valuable byproduct. However, as detailed below, the central identification is conditional on an external input for the 1/N coefficient; the paper's abstract overstates what has been derived from supergravity alone.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.31)-(4.33)] The quadratic-order state is not fully determined by the supergravity data. The leading-order matching fixes all coefficients except gamma_tilde_7 and the sign delta. These are subsequently fixed either by imposing that O(2) be expressible as a sum of the 1/4-BPS operator O1/4 and half-BPS double-traces, or by assuming that the matching equations (4.30) hold at finite N to first 1/N^2 order. Both are extra inputs rather than consequences of the holographic computation: the first imposes the 1/4-BPS structure by fiat, and the second is an extrapolation from the 1/2-BPS analysis of [36]. Thus the coefficient -1/(3N) epsilon^2 beta1 beta2 (TrXXYY - TrXYXY) in Eq. (4.32) is conditional on an unproven assumption. The abstract's statement that protected quarter-BPS operators 'can be fully reconstructed from supergravity alone' is therefore not supported by the manuscript as written. The consis
[Sec. 4.3, finite-N assumption after Eq. (4.31)] The finite-N matching assumption is load-bearing: it is used to fix the subleading 1/N mixing of O1/4, which is precisely the novel part of the claimed result. No derivation or independent check of this extension to 1/4-BPS heavy states is provided; the paper explicitly notes that a dimension-4 expectation value could fix the coefficient but does not compute it. As written, the claimed 1/N correction remains a conjecture supported by an input external to the supergravity data. I recommend either computing the dimension-4 vev within the paper's framework or reformulating the result as explicitly conditional, with the abstract and conclusions adjusted accordingly.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 2] Typo: 'kay role' should be 'key role'.
[Sec. 4.1] Typo: 'expectation vales' should be 'expectation values'.
[Sec. 4.3] The explicit linear system from the Wick contractions that determines the coefficients other than gamma_tilde_7 is not displayed. Providing this system (or an ancillary file) would substantially improve the verifiability of the matching.
[Abstract and Introduction] There are several formatting issues: 'subleading1/Ncorrections' appears without proper spacing; the claim 'fully reconstructed from supergravity alone' should be softened if the finite-N assumption is retained as an input.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Leading-order state matching is genuinely overdetermined, but the advertised subleading 1/N mixing of the quarter-BPS operator is fixed by an imported ansatz/dictionary assumption rather than by the holographic data.

self definitional [Sec. 4.3, eqs. (2.5), (4.30)-(4.33)]
"This missing coefficient is not a failure of the holographic dictionary, but an artifact of the incomplete matching: it could be fixed by considering the expectation values of chiral primaries of dimension 4 or higher. There are however, two indirect, simpler ways to determine it. The first approach is to refine the ansatz, to incorporate the fact that the heavy state must be 1/4-BPS. Under this assumption, O(2) should be expressible as a sum of the operator O1/4 defined in (2.5), and of a 1/2-BPS component."

The subleading 1/N term in the final state, -(1/3N)ε^2 β1β2(TrXXYY−TrXYXY), is presented as reconstructed from supergravity. But the input that fixes it is the assumption that O(2) decomposes into half-BPS double traces plus the operator O1/4 defined in (2.5). That defining expression already contains -2/N(TrXXYY−TrXYXY); imposing the decomposition forces γ̃7 and δ to the values making the non-half-BPS part proportional to O1/4. The alternative route, assuming the matching equations (4.30) hold at finite N (first 1/N^2 order), is likewise an unproven extrapolation, not a consequence of the computed leading-order vevs. Thus the 1/N mixing is effectively an input relabeled as a supergravity-derived prediction. The leading-order coefficients are independently overdetermined, so the circularit

full rationale

Most of the paper is a genuine holographic computation. The bulk asymptotic data (Sec. 3.6, App. B) are fed through the KK holographic dictionary [13,14] to produce the dimension-2 vevs (4.19), R-charges (4.20), and energy (4.21); these are matched, via the non-renormalization theorem [52], to free-field Wick contractions in an 8-parameter symmetric ansatz (4.29). The matching equations (4.30) at leading N overdetermine the double-trace coefficients and fix all but one combination (γ̃7 and the sign δ). That part is not circular. The circularity/conditionality enters at the final step: the remaining subleading 1/N coefficient is not fixed by the leading-order holographic data; it is obtained either by imposing the 1/4-BPS decomposition of O(2) in terms of O1/4 defined in (2.5), or by assuming the matching equations hold at order 1/N^2 (an extrapolation from the 1/2-BPS result [36]). In both routes the 1/N mixing is an input rather than a computed supergravity prediction, so the abstract's claim that quarter-BPS operators 'including their subleading 1/N corrections, can be fully reconstructed from supergravity alone' is too strong for that coefficient. The paper itself flags the incompleteness ('This missing coefficient is not a failure of the holographic dictionary, but an artifact of the incomplete matching'). Self-citations ([9], [54]) are technical or programmatic and not load-bearing for the central CFT-state claim. Overall: partial circularity in the subleading 1/N claim; the leading-order matching is independent and nontrivial.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. Its central claim rests on the consistency of the 5D truncation, the non-renormalization theorem for protected three-point functions, and an explicitly assumed finite-N extension of the holographic matching—the last being the main additional input beyond standard large-N AdS/CFT. The deformation parameters β1, β2 are physical labels of the solution family rather than fit parameters.

free parameters (1)

β1, β2
Amplitudes of the two leading scalar deformations (3.37); they label the family of 1/4-BPS bubbles and appear as expansion parameters in the CFT state. They are solution parameters chosen by hand, not fitted to data.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The 5D SO(6)-gauged supergravity truncation of Type IIB on S^5 is consistent, and the diagonal U(1)^3 subsector retains the 1/4-BPS solutions of interest.
Invoked in Sec. 3.1 to reduce the problem to fields (3.7)–(3.8); relies on the consistent reduction of [51].
domain assumption Three-point functions of the form (4.1) are protected (non-renormalized) when the inequalities (4.2) hold.
Invoked in Sec. 4 to equate free-theory Wick contractions with strong-coupling supergravity results; cited to [52] and reviewed in [43].
ad hoc to paper The matching equations (4.30) hold at finite N, at least to first 1/N² order, not only at leading large N.
Sec. 4.3: used to fix γ̃7 and δ (the 1/N mixing in O1/4). Explicitly labeled as an assumption, extrapolated from the 1/2-BPS case [36]; no derivation is given here.
domain assumption ⟨Op⟩ = 0 for all single-particle chiral primaries of dimension p > 2 in these geometries.
Sec. 4.1 (eq. 4.22): argued from the consistent truncation projecting out higher KK modes; verified for one dimension-4 example (4.24), but not exhaustively.
domain assumption The operator O1/4 in (2.5) is the unique [2,0,2] quarter-BPS operator with protected dimension Δ = 4.
Sec. 2: one-loop protected dimension from [45]; conjectured to receive no higher-loop corrections [50]. Used to identify the quarter-BPS component in the reconstructed state.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holography of quarter-BPS AdS bubbles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4IVUBOBW

@misc{pith2026251207767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holography of quarter-BPS AdS bubbles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4IVUBOBW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.07767}
}

abstract

We consider the quarter-BPS sector of the AdS$_5$/CFT$_4$ duality, and provide a precise matching between specific CFT states and supergravity geometries beyond the linearized approximation. In the bulk, we focus on AdS bubbles geometries that fit within a consistent truncation to five-dimensional gauged supergravity. We show that the BPS equations can be decoupled, and study the resulting geometries both perturbatively and numerically. Applying the holographic dictionary, we compute the expectation values of light chiral primaries in these backgrounds. This data allows us to determine the dual CFT state up to quadratic order in the fluctuations, and to provide non-trivial consistency checks of the result. The resulting state is expressed as a linear combination of half-BPS double-trace operators, and of the unique $[2,0,2]$ quarter-BPS operator of the theory. As an application, we compute three-point functions involving two quarter-BPS operators and a half-BPS operator in the supergravity regime, finding an explicit example of a correlator that differs from its free theory value and that is therefore not protected.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 linked inside Pith

[9]

Ganchev, S

B. Ganchev, S. Giusto, A. Houppe, R. Russo, and N. P. Warner,Microstrata,JHEP10(2023) 163, [arXiv:2307.13021]

arXiv 2023
[36]

Aprile, S

F. Aprile, S. Giusto, and R. Russo,Four-point correlators with BPS bound states in AdS3 and AdS5,JHEP08(2025) 193, [arXiv:2503.02855]

arXiv 2025
[1]

J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1998
[2]

Strominger and C

A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

arXiv 1996
[3]

Lunin and S

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur,AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information paradox,Nucl. Phys. B623(2002) 342–394, [hep-th/0109154]

arXiv 2002
[4]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, and N. P. Warner,Habemus Superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata,JHEP05(2015) 110, [arXiv:1503.01463]

arXiv 2015
[5]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:1607.03908]

arXiv 2016
[6]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, Asymptotically-flat supergravity solutions deep inside the black-hole regime,JHEP02(2018) 014, [arXiv:1711.10474]

arXiv 2018

Show all 55 references

[7]

Čeplak, R

N. Čeplak, R. Russo, and M. Shigemori,Supercharging Superstrata,JHEP03(2019) 095, [arXiv:1812.08761]

2019 arXiv
[8]

Heidmann, D

P. Heidmann, D. R. Mayerson, R. Walker, and N. P. Warner,Holomorphic Waves of Black Hole Microstructure,JHEP02(2020) 192, [arXiv:1910.10714]

2020 arXiv
[10]

Čeplak and S

N. Čeplak and S. D. Hampton,Vector superstrata. Part II,JHEP10(2024) 011, [arXiv:2405.05341]

2024 arXiv
[11]

I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur, and N. P. Warner,Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,arXiv:2204.13113

arXiv
[12]

Bena and N

I. Bena and N. P. Warner,Microstate Geometries,arXiv:2503.17310

arXiv
[13]

Skenderis and M

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor,Kaluza-Klein holography,JHEP05(2006) 057, [hep-th/0603016]

2006 arXiv
[14]

Skenderis and M

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor,Anatomy of bubbling solutions,JHEP09(2007) 019, [arXiv:0706.0216]

2007 arXiv
[15]

Kanitscheider, K

I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor,Holographic anatomy of fuzzballs,JHEP04 (2007) 023, [hep-th/0611171]

2007 arXiv
[16]

Giusto, E

S. Giusto, E. Moscato, and R. Russo,AdS3 holography for 1/4 and 1/8 BPS geometries,JHEP 11(2015) 004, [arXiv:1507.00945]

2015 arXiv
[17]

Giusto, S

S. Giusto, S. Rawash, and D. Turton,Ads3 holography at dimension two,JHEP07(2019) 171, [arXiv:1904.12880]

2019 arXiv
[18]

Rawash and D

S. Rawash and D. Turton,Supercharged AdS3 Holography,JHEP07(2021) 178, [arXiv:2105.13046]

2021 arXiv
[19]

Turton and A

D. Turton and A. Tyukov,Precision holography of AdS5 bubbling geometries,JHEP07(2025) 027, [arXiv:2503.19760]. – 28 –

2025 arXiv
[20]

Galliani, S

A. Galliani, S. Giusto, and R. Russo,Holographic 4-point correlators with heavy states,JHEP 10(2017) 040, [arXiv:1705.09250]

2017 arXiv
[21]

Bombini, A

A. Bombini, A. Galliani, S. Giusto, E. Moscato, and R. Russo,Unitary 4-point correlators from classical geometries,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 1 8, [arXiv:1710.06820]

2018 arXiv
[22]

Giusto, R

S. Giusto, R. Russo, and C. Wen,Holographic correlators in AdS3,JHEP03(2019) 096, [arXiv:1812.06479]

2019 arXiv
[23]

Bombini and A

A. Bombini and A. Galliani,AdS3 four-point functions from 1 8 -BPS states,JHEP06(2019) 044, [arXiv:1904.02656]

2019 arXiv
[24]

Ceplak, S

N. Ceplak, S. Giusto, M. R. R. Hughes, and R. Russo,Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,JHEP09(2021) 204, [arXiv:2105.04670]

2021 arXiv
[25]

Turton and A

D. Turton and A. Tyukov,Four-point correlators inN= 4 SYM from AdS5 bubbling geometries,JHEP10(2024) 244, [arXiv:2408.16834]

2024 arXiv
[26]

Sen,Black Hole Entropy Function, Attractors and Precision Counting of Microstates,Gen

A. Sen,Black Hole Entropy Function, Attractors and Precision Counting of Microstates,Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 2249–2431, [arXiv:0708.1270]

2008 arXiv
[27]

Benini, K

F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni,Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization,JHEP05(2016) 054, [arXiv:1511.04085]

2016 arXiv
[28]

Azzurli, N

F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P. M. Crichigno, V. S. Min, and A. Zaffaroni,A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS4,JHEP02(2018) 054, [arXiv:1707.04257]

2018 arXiv
[29]

Cabo-Bizet, D

A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes,JHEP10(2019) 062, [arXiv:1810.11442]

2019 arXiv
[30]

H. Lin, O. Lunin, and J. M. Maldacena,Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,JHEP10 (2004) 025, [hep-th/0409174]

2004 arXiv
[31]

Berenstein,A Toy model for the AdS / CFT correspondence,JHEP07(2004) 018, [hep-th/0403110]

D. Berenstein,A Toy model for the AdS / CFT correspondence,JHEP07(2004) 018, [hep-th/0403110]

2004 arXiv
[32]

Berenstein and S

D. Berenstein and S. Wang,BPS coherent states and localization,JHEP08(2022) 164, [arXiv:2203.15820]

2022 arXiv
[33]

Anempodistov, A

P. Anempodistov, A. Holguin, V. Kazakov, and H. Murali,(Un)solvable Matrix Models for BPS Correlators,arXiv:2508.20094

arXiv
[34]

Giusto and A

S. Giusto and A. Rosso,The geometry of large charge multi-traces inN= 4 SYM,JHEP10 (2024) 200, [arXiv:2401.01254]

2024 arXiv
[35]

Aprile, S

F. Aprile, S. Giusto, and R. Russo,Holographic correlators with BPS bound states inN= 4 SYM,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 9 091602, [arXiv:2409.12911]

2025 arXiv
[37]

Donos,A Description of 1/4 BPS configurations in minimal type IIB SUGRA,Phys

A. Donos,A Description of 1/4 BPS configurations in minimal type IIB SUGRA,Phys. Rev. D 75(2007) 025010, [hep-th/0606199]

2007 arXiv
[38]

B. Chen, S. Cremonini, A. Donos, F.-L. Lin, H. Lin, J. T. Liu, D. Vaman, and W.-Y. Wen, – 29 – Bubbling AdS and droplet descriptions of BPS geometries in IIB supergravity,JHEP10(2007) 003, [arXiv:0704.2233]

2007 arXiv
[39]

Lunin,Brane webs and 1/4-BPS geometries,JHEP09(2008) 028, [arXiv:0802.0735]

O. Lunin,Brane webs and 1/4-BPS geometries,JHEP09(2008) 028, [arXiv:0802.0735]

2008 arXiv
[40]

Kimura and H

Y. Kimura and H. Lin,Young diagrams, Brauer algebras, and bubbling geometries,JHEP01 (2012) 121, [arXiv:1109.2585]

2012 arXiv
[41]

Z. W. Chong, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope,BPS geometries and AdS bubbles,Phys. Lett. B614 (2005) 96–103, [hep-th/0412221]

2005 arXiv
[42]

J. T. Liu, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, and J. F. Vazquez-Poritz,New supersymmetric solutions of N=2, D=5 gauged supergravity with hyperscalars,JHEP10(2007) 093, [arXiv:0705.2234]

2007 arXiv
[43]

Bissi, G

A. Bissi, G. Fardelli, and A. Manenti,Rebooting quarter-BPS operators inN= 4 super Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2022) 016, [arXiv:2111.06857]

2022 arXiv
[44]

D’Hoker, P

E. D’Hoker, P. Heslop, P. Howe, and A. V. Ryzhov,Systematics of quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,JHEP04(2003) 038, [hep-th/0301104]

2003 arXiv
[45]

A. V. Ryzhov,Quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,JHEP11(2001) 046, [hep-th/0109064]

2001 arXiv
[46]

H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Mass spectrum of chiral ten-dimensional n=2 supergravity onS5,Phys. Rev. D32(Jul, 1985) 389–399

1985
[47]

Aprile, J

F. Aprile, J. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul,Double-trace spectrum ofN= 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 12 126008, [arXiv:1802.06889]

2018 arXiv
[48]

Aprile, J

F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, H. Paul, F. Sanfilippo, M. Santagata, and A. Stewart, Single particle operators and their correlators in freeN= 4 SYM,JHEP11(2020) 072, [arXiv:2007.09395]

2020 arXiv
[49]

Lewis-Brown and S

C. Lewis-Brown and S. Ramgoolam,Quarter-BPS states, multi-symmetric functions and set partitions,JHEP03(2021) 153, [arXiv:2007.01734]

2021 arXiv
[50]

Pasukonis and S

J. Pasukonis and S. Ramgoolam,From counting to construction of BPS states in N=4 SYM, JHEP02(2011) 078, [arXiv:1010.1683]

2011 arXiv
[51]

Cvetic, H

M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh, and T. A. Tran,Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S**5,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 275–286, [hep-th/0003103]

2000 arXiv
[52]

D’Hoker and A

E. D’Hoker and A. V. Ryzhov,Three point functions of quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM, JHEP02(2002) 047, [hep-th/0109065]

2002 arXiv
[53]

Ó. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way,Numerical Methods for Finding Stationary Gravitational Solutions,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016), no. 13 133001, [arXiv:1510.02804]

2016 arXiv
[54]

Aprile, B

F. Aprile, B. Ganchev, S. Giusto, A. Houppe, R. Russo, and J. Vilas Boas Work in progress, 2026

2026
[55]

F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,On short and semi-short representations for four-dimensional superconformal symmetry,Annals Phys.307(2003) 41–89, [hep-th/0209056]. – 30 –

2003 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

Ganchev, S

B. Ganchev, S. Giusto, A. Houppe, R. Russo, and N. P. Warner,Microstrata,JHEP10(2023) 163, [arXiv:2307.13021]

arXiv 2023

[2] [36]

Aprile, S

F. Aprile, S. Giusto, and R. Russo,Four-point correlators with BPS bound states in AdS3 and AdS5,JHEP08(2025) 193, [arXiv:2503.02855]

arXiv 2025

[3] [1]

J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1998

[4] [2]

Strominger and C

A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

arXiv 1996

[5] [3]

Lunin and S

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur,AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information paradox,Nucl. Phys. B623(2002) 342–394, [hep-th/0109154]

arXiv 2002

[6] [4]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, and N. P. Warner,Habemus Superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata,JHEP05(2015) 110, [arXiv:1503.01463]

arXiv 2015

[7] [5]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:1607.03908]

arXiv 2016

[8] [6]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, Asymptotically-flat supergravity solutions deep inside the black-hole regime,JHEP02(2018) 014, [arXiv:1711.10474]

arXiv 2018