Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Bulk-Edge Correspondence for Finite Two-dimensional Ergodic Disordered Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The edge index of a finite disordered system converges almost surely to the refined bulk index.

desk verdict The central theorem is plausible and the derivation is genuine, but the proof of separate convergence in Step 3.4 rests on a false operator identity; the paper deserves review but will need repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.11092 v2 pith:6BUB4XVC submitted 2025-12-11 math-ph math.MP

Habib Ammari , Jiayu Qiu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 82B4435P2037A3082D03
keywords bulk-edgecorrespondenceergodicdisordermobilitygapAndersonlocalizationedgeindexHallconductancetopologicalinsulatorsfinite-sizesystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves the bulk–edge correspondence for finite two-dimensional systems with on-site disorder: for a box of size L, an edge index that measures the averaged angular momentum of in-gap modes converges, as L→∞ and almost surely over disorder, to a refined bulk index built from the Hall conductance plus a sum over disorder-localized eigenvalues. This extends the previous finite-system correspondence (known for periodic media with a spectral gap) to the disorder regime, where the relevant notion of gap is the mobility gap. The proof holds inside a mobility gap and uses a Helffer–Sjöstrand representation, exponential localization of resolvents, and trace-per-unit-volume arguments. The authors also prove, under a fast-decay condition on the disorder distribution, that such a mobility gap opens near the band edge of a periodic Hamiltonian, and they verify all assumptions on a standard two-band model for anomalous Hall physics.

What carries the argument

The edge index is an averaged angular momentum of modes in the mobility gap, computed as a trace of commutators with the position operators weighted by the derivative of a smooth cutoff function. The refined bulk index adds to the Hall conductance a sum over disorder-localized eigenvalues with the same weights. The link is forged by a Helffer–Sjöstrand formula expressing the smoothed delta as a resolvent integral, by resolvent identities showing that replacing the box Hamiltonian by the bulk Hamiltonian introduces an error that vanishes as L→∞, and by exponential localization estimates that justify trace cyclicity and term-by-term exchanges. The existence of a mobility gap is established thr

What would settle it

Compute, for a two-dimensional tight-binding Chern insulator with a mobility gap whose disorder is, say, uniform on a small interval around zero (violating the t^5 decay), the finite-box edge index for growing L; if the limit differs from the refined bulk index or fails to converge, the main theorem's scope is contradicted. More directly, find a Hamiltonian satisfying the mobility-gap hypothesis for which the limit of the edge index is not the refined bulk index.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an equality between two a priori different quantities: the finite-box edge index, defined as an averaged trace of commutators with position operators weighted by a smoothed delta at the mobility gap, and the refined bulk index, defined as the usual Hall conductance plus a sum over the localized eigenvalues in the mobility gap. The main theorem states that for any subinterval of a mobility gap and any appropriate smoothing function, the limit as L→∞ equals the refined bulk index almost surely. The proof shows that the boundary terms of the box resolvent are negligible in the limit, so the edge quantity converges to a bulk quantity, and then identifies that bulk quanti

Load-bearing premise

The proof that a mobility gap exists requires the disorder distribution to vanish at the bottom of its support at least as fast as t^5; without that fast decay, the geometric-decoupling iteration cannot start, so the paper's unconditional bulk–edge statement is restricted to such specially decaying disorder distributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any finite disordered system with a mobility gap, measurements of edge-mode angular momentum on large samples converge to a quantized topological bulk quantity, making the bulk–edge correspondence accessible on finite samples.
  • The refined bulk index is the correct finite-sample limit, so disorder-localized bulk states contribute an extra term that must be included to match edge observables.
  • The proof establishes that the Hall conductance remains quantized inside the mobility gap even when the spectrum is pure point.
  • The conditions are verified on a concrete two-band lattice model, so the result applies to anomalous-Hall-type materials with appropriately decaying disorder.
  • Simply-connected domains with more general shapes are expected to obey the same correspondence, a point the paper leaves to the reader.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fast-decay condition on the disorder density is relaxed, the mobility-gap existence proof may break down; physically common distributions such as uniform on an interval would then require a different mechanism for gap opening, and the paper explicitly leaves this as an open problem.
  • The refined bulk index suggests a practical finite-size estimator: computing the Hall conductance plus the weighted sum over localized eigenvalues in a finite sample could yield a topological invariant that is stable at finite size.
  • The circulation interpretation of the edge index points to a concrete experimental probe: measuring the angular momentum of electronic or photonic edge modes in finite samples of topological alloys could directly test the predicted convergence.
  • The techniques may extend to three-dimensional systems or other boundary conditions, since the proof relies mainly on exponential localization and short-range hopping rather than on the square-box geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper aims to establish a bulk-edge correspondence for finite two-dimensional ergodic disordered tight-binding Hamiltonians. It defines a finite-sample edge index as an averaged angular momentum of in-gap modes and a refined bulk index consisting of the usual Hall conductance plus a sum over disorder-localized eigenvalues. The main theorem (Theorem 2.10) asserts that, under an Aizenman-Molchanov mobility gap (Hypothesis 2.4), the edge index converges almost surely to the refined bulk index as the sample size grows. The paper also proves the existence of such a mobility gap under Assumption 2.12 (a decay condition on the disorder density) via the geometric decoupling method (Theorem 2.13), and checks the assumptions on the Qi-Wu-Zhang model. The proof strategy uses Helffer-Sjostrand calculus, resolvent estimates, and trace-per-unit-volume arguments.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is a substantial step: it extends the bulk-edge correspondence from periodic or infinite systems to finite disordered samples, with a rigorous treatment of the contribution of localized bulk states. The paper contains a detailed proof skeleton and verifies the hypotheses on a concrete model, which makes the result plausible and potentially influential. The Aizenman-Molchanov localization argument for a random gap-opening potential is also of independent interest. However, the current manuscript has a load-bearing technical gap in the proof of well-definedness of the refined bulk index, and the conditional nature of the main theorem (depending on a mobility gap that is proved only under a restrictive density assumption) limit the scope of the claims as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.3, Eq. (5.27)] The operator identity used to justify the interchange of the λ0-sum and the expectation in the proof of (5.24) is false. The text claims that for Σ''⊂Σ'\supp(ρ), with A=√ρ(H) and B=1_{Σ''}(H), one has B[A,x_i][A,x_j] = B(1-A)x_i x_j A. A direct expansion gives B[A,x_i][A,x_j] = -B x_i ρ x_j + B x_i A x_j A, which is not equal to B x_i x_j A in general. For example, take H = |+⟩⟨+| on ℓ²({0,1}) with |±⟩=(|0⟩±|1⟩)/√2, x=diag(0,1), ρ a smooth function with ρ(0)=0 and ρ(1)=1, and B=|−⟩⟨−|. Then B[A,x][A,x] = -1/4 B while B(1-A)x x A = [[0,0],[-1/2,0]], a contradiction. This invalidates the proof of separate convergence of the two series in (5.25), and hence the proof that the refined bulk index in (2.5) is well-defined. Since Theorem 2.10 directly uses this index, this is a load-bearing gap that must be repaired.
  2. [§5.3, Eq. (5.21)] The analogous identity for λ0∈supp(ρ) is also not correct as stated. The manuscript claims 1_{λ0}[ρ,x_i]x_j 1_{λ0} = 1_{λ0} x_i ρ_c x_j 1_{λ0} with ρ_c=1-ρ. However, a direct computation gives 1_{λ0}[ρ,x_i]x_j 1_{λ0} = -ρ_c(λ0) 1_{λ0} x_i x_j 1_{λ0} + 1_{λ0} x_i ρ_c x_j 1_{λ0}. The extra term does not vanish as an operator. For the pairs (i,j)=(1,2) and (2,1) used in the final formula, its trace per unit volume may vanish by reflection symmetry, but the proof does not state or use this, and the pointwise kernel bounds in (5.22) would need modification. This needs to be clarified and corrected.
  3. [§5.3, Eq. (5.15) and footnote 12] The vanishing of the S^{(2)} term in (5.15) is a crucial step leading to (5.16), but the justification is deferred. Footnote 12 states that the unboundedness of the position operator is 'not essential' and that 'the details are left for the interested reader'. Since the position operators are genuinely unbounded on ℓ²(Z²), and the argument relies on analyticity of (H−z)^{-1}P on the range of P_{±}, a complete proof is required. As written, this is a missing justification for a load-bearing step. The authors should either provide the full argument or cite a reference where this exact unbounded-operator version is proved.
  4. [§6, Proposition 6.1] The proof of Proposition 6.1 uses the bound sup_{1≤i≤d}|V_i| ≤ Δ, attributed to 'Assumption 2.11 (i)'. However, Assumption 2.11 does not state such a bound; it only assumes the existence of a spectral gap (λ0−Δ, λ0+Δ) for H_per. Without a bound on the strength of the gap-opening potential, the Feynman-Hellmann estimate |λ'(t)| ≤ Δ sup|1−ω| is not justified. This is fixable by adding an explicit assumption, but as stated the proof of the Lifshitz tail estimate, and hence Theorem 2.13, is incomplete.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typos, e.g., 'Hamitonians' in the Introduction. The abstract says 'bulk index is the sum of the Hall conductance' while the body defines the refined bulk index as Hall conductance plus a sum; this is fine but could be clarified.
  2. [§5.2] In the sentence following (5.9), there are inconsistencies in the notation H_{ω,L} vs H_ω in some intermediate expressions. Please proofread.
  3. [§4.1, Lemma 4.7] The proof of Lemma 4.7 uses a parameter γ that is not defined in the lemma statement; it should be ν or another explicitly defined parameter.
  4. [§6.2] The choice of β and q after (6.11) is only sketched. Since η>5, one may choose β close to 1 and q in (1, (ηβ−2)/3); the authors should spell this out for readability.
  5. [Appendix B] The proof of Theorem B.3 is deferred entirely ('the detailed proof follows the same lines as in Section 6, which is left for the interested reader'). Since Theorem B.1 relies on this deformation argument, the appendix is not self-contained. Please either provide the proof or state clearly that the result is conditional on a proof that appears elsewhere.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bulk-edge limit identity is derived rather than defined into existence; self-citations are background/technical and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central identity (Theorem 2.10) is not equivalent to any input by construction. The edge index (2.4) and the refined bulk index (2.5) are defined independently; Step 3.5 proves equality (5.28) by explicit trace manipulations rather than by fiat. The localized-eigenvalue sum in (2.5) is not fitted to the edge index: Steps 3.3–3.4 derive the matching contribution from the Helffer–Sjöstrand expansion of the edge index. Hypothesis 2.4 is an explicit hypothesis, and Theorem 2.13 derives it under Assumptions 2.11–2.12 via the geometric decoupling method, so the mobility gap is not assumed as the conclusion. Self-citations: Theorem 2.8 references the authors' own prior work [58] for the periodic case, but the disordered proof in Section 5 re-derives the finite-volume limit; the proof does not assume Theorem 2.8. Footnote 12 delegates the proof of the vanishing of (5.15) to [59, Proposition 2.9] (same author group); this is a technical step with a sketch provided, not the central claim. Thus no circular reduction is exhibited. Separate caveat (correctness, not circularity): the convergence proof for the localized series in Step 3.4 uses identity (5.27), which appears algebraically false (e.g. a two-site check gives LHS = -B while RHS = 0); if so, the well-definedness of (2.5) and the theorem are not justified by the text. This gap does not make the derivation circular; it makes it incomplete.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting: constants η, β, q, L, δ, C are chosen inside proofs rather than fitted to data. The main theorem (2.10) is conditional on the Aizenman–Molchanov mobility gap Hypothesis 2.4, verified in Theorem 2.13 only under the restrictive density-decay Assumption 2.12 (η>5) and gap-opening Assumption 2.11. The paper leans on a dozen results from the authors' own prior work (notably [58] for the finite-system edge index and method); this is self-citation but not circular, as those results are independently derived. No new physical entities are introduced: the refined bulk index is a new mathematical functional.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: H0 is periodic and short-range (∥H0(n,m)∥=0 for |n-m|_1 ≥ 2)
    Defines the class of deterministic tight-binding Hamiltonians; used throughout the proofs of Theorem 2.10 and 2.13.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.3: random potential Vω with i.i.d. entries with bounded compactly-supported density
    Standard alloy-type disorder; ensures boundedness, covariance, and enables fractional-moment bounds and the Birkhoff ergodic theorem.
  • domain assumption Hypothesis 2.4: I is an Aizenman–Molchanov mobility gap (E∥G^s∥ ≤ C e^{-α|n-m|})
    Main hypothesis for Theorems 2.10; proved for a restricted class in Theorem 2.13 under Assumptions 2.11 and 2.12.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.11: H_per has a spectral gap (λ0-Δ, λ0+Δ)
    Gap-opening potential; needed for the Lifshitz tail (Prop 6.1) and the deformation argument (Appendix B).
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 2.12: supp μ = [0,1] and ∫_0^t dμ ≤ C t^η with η > 5
    Method-driven, non-optimal condition stated by the authors (Remarks 2.14, 6.2) to force a β<1 Lifshitz tail; uniform disorder (η=1) fails it. This is the weakest structural input for Theorem 2.13.
  • standard math Fractional-moment a priori bounds (Lemmas 6.3, 6.4) cited from [53] and [67]
    Boundedness of E∥G∥^s with s<1 for finite-box and whole-space Green functions; used in the initial length estimate and the geometric-decoupling iteration.
  • standard math Combes–Thomas estimate (Lemma 4.1) and Helffer–Sjöstrand functional calculus
    Exponential decay of resolvents and smooth functional calculus used throughout Section 5 and Section 6.
  • standard math Birkhoff ergodic theorem / covariance of TPUV (Lemmas 4.9, 4.10)
    Replaces trace per unit volume by expectation for covariant operators; used to turn TPUV identities into almost-sure statements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bulk-Edge Correspondence for Finite Two-dimensional Ergodic Disordered Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6BUB4XVC

@misc{pith2026251211092,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bulk-Edge Correspondence for Finite Two-dimensional Ergodic Disordered Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6BUB4XVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.11092}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we rigorously prove the bulk-edge correspondence for finite two-dimensional ergodic disordered systems. Specifically, we focus on the short-range Hamiltonians with ergodic disordered on-site potentials. We first introduce the bulk and edge indices, which are both well-defined within the Aizenman-Molchanov mobility gap. On the one hand, the bulk index is the usual Hall conductance, which is a well-studied quantized topological number. On the other hand, the edge index, which characterizes the averaged angular momentum of edge modes in the mobility gap, is uniquely associated with finite systems. Our main result proves that as the sample size tends to infinity, the edge index converges to the bulk index almost surely. Our findings provide a rigorous foundation for the bulk-edge correspondence principle for finite disordered systems. The existence of the Aizenman-Molchanov mobility gap is proved by the geometric decoupling method, introduced by Aizenman and Molchanov [Comm. Math. Phys., 1993], under a rational assumption on the distribution of the random potential. For completeness, all assumptions are checked on a prototypical model for (quantum) anomalous Hall physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11092 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A finite sample ΛL (dashed square with black sites). whenever the limit exists. Then for P−a.e. ω, Ebulk,ω,λ = E(Ebulk,ω,λ) ∈ Z and is constant in λ ∈ I. By the independence shown above, we will omit the subscript λ in Ebulk,ω,λ whenever no confusion arises. As being well-known, the quantized index Ebulk,ω is a topological number, which recovers the first Chern number of the eigenbundle Pω,λ when Hω is non-random an… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robustness of Valley-Hall Interface Modes Against Sharp Bending

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Valley-Hall interface modes persist under a 2π/3 bend for all non-vanishing group-velocity frequencies in the bulk gap except a finite exceptional set.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Localization at weak disorder: some elementary bounds.Reviews in mathematical physics, 6(05a):1163–1182, 1994

    Michael Aizenman. Localization at weak disorder: some elementary bounds.Reviews in mathematical physics, 6(05a):1163–1182, 1994

    1994

  2. [2]

    Michael Aizenman and Gian M. Graf. Localization bounds for an electron gas.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(32):6783, 1998

    1998

  3. [3]

    Localization at large disorder and at extreme energies: An elementary derivations.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 157(2):245–278, 1993

    Michael Aizenman and Stanislav Molchanov. Localization at large disorder and at extreme energies: An elementary derivations.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 157(2):245–278, 1993

    1993

  4. [4]

    Schenker, Roland M

    Michael Aizenman, Jeffrey H. Schenker, Roland M. Friedrich, and Dirk Hundertmark. Finite- volume fractional-moment criteria for Anderson localization.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 224(1):219–253, 2001

    2001

  5. [5]

    Mathematical foundations of the non-hermitian skin effect.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 248(3):33, 2024

    Habib Ammari, Silvio Barandun, Jinghao Cao, Bryn Davies, and Erik Orvehed Hiltunen. Mathematical foundations of the non-hermitian skin effect.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 248(3):33, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Exponentially localized interface eigenmodes in finite chains of resonators.Stud

    Habib Ammari, Silvio Barandun, Bryn Davies, Erik Orvehed Hiltunen, Thea Kosche, and Ping Liu. Exponentially localized interface eigenmodes in finite chains of resonators.Stud. Appl. Math., 153(4):Paper No. e12765, 25, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Applications of chebyshev polynomials and toeplitz theory to topological metamaterials.Reviews in Physics, 13:Paper No

    Habib Ammari, Silvio Barandun, and Ping Liu. Applications of chebyshev polynomials and toeplitz theory to topological metamaterials.Reviews in Physics, 13:Paper No. 100103, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Robust edge modes in dislocated systems of subwavelength resonators.J

    Habib Ammari, Bryn Davies, and Erik Orvehed Hiltunen. Robust edge modes in dislocated systems of subwavelength resonators.J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 106(3):2075–2135, 2022

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Anderson localization in the subwavelength regime.Comm

    Habib Ammari, Bryn Davies, and Erik Orvehed Hiltunen. Anderson localization in the subwavelength regime.Comm. Math. Phys., 405(1):Paper No. 1, 20, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Topologically protected edge modes in one-dimensional chains of subwavelength resonators.J

    Habib Ammari, Bryn Davies, Erik Orvehed Hiltunen, and Sanghyeon Yu. Topologically protected edge modes in one-dimensional chains of subwavelength resonators.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 144:17–49, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Topological phenomena in honeycomb Floquet metamaterials.Math

    Habib Ammari and Thea Kosche. Topological phenomena in honeycomb Floquet metamaterials.Math. Ann., 388(3):2755–2785, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Topological invariants of edge states for periodic two-dimensional models.Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 16(2):137–170, 2013

    Julio Cesar Avila, Hermann Schulz-Baldes, and Carlos Villegas-Blas. Topological invariants of edge states for periodic two-dimensional models.Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 16(2):137–170, 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Avron, Ruedi Seiler, and Barry Simon

    Joseph E. Avron, Ruedi Seiler, and Barry Simon. Charge deficiency, charge transport and comparison of dimensions.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 159(2):399–422, Jan 1994

    1994

  6. [14]

    Continuous bulk and interface description of topological insulators.Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics, 60(8), 2019

    Guillaume Bal. Continuous bulk and interface description of topological insulators.Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics, 60(8), 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Topological charge conservation for continuous insulators.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 64(3), 2023

    Guillaume Bal. Topological charge conservation for continuous insulators.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 64(3), 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Continuous topological insulators classification and bulk edge correspondence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00919, 2024

    Guillaume Bal. Continuous topological insulators classification and bulk edge correspondence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00919, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Guillaume Bal, Simon Becker, Alexis Drouot, Clotilde Fermanian Kammerer, Jianfeng Lu, and Alexan- der B. Watson. Edge state dynamics along curved interfaces.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(5):4219–4254, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Jean-Marie Barbaroux, Jean-Michel Combes, and Peter D. Hislop. Localization near band edges for random Schr¨ odinger operators.Helvetica Physica Acta, 70(1):16–43, 1997

    1997

  11. [19]

    Localization for gapped Dirac hamiltonians with random perturbations: Application to graphene antidot lattices.Documenta Mathematica, 24:65–93, 2019

    Jean-Marie Barbaroux, Horia D Cornean, and Sylvain Zalczer. Localization for gapped Dirac hamiltonians with random perturbations: Application to graphene antidot lattices.Documenta Mathematica, 24:65–93, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz- Baldes. The noncommutative geometry of the quantum Hall effect.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 35(10):5373–5451, 10 1994

    1994

  13. [21]

    Andrei Bernevig and Taylor L

    B. Andrei Bernevig and Taylor L. Hughes.Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors. Prince- ton University Press, 2013. 34 HABIB AMMARI AND JIAYU QIU

    2013

  14. [22]

    Schenker

    Jean-Marc Bouclet, Francois Germinet, Abel Klein, and Jeffrey H. Schenker. Linear response theory for magnetic Schr¨ odinger operators in disordered media.Journal of Functional Analysis, 226(2):301–372, 2005

    2005

  15. [23]

    The k-theoretic bulk–edge correspondence for topological insulators

    Chris Bourne, Johannes Kellendonk, and Adam Rennie. The k-theoretic bulk–edge correspondence for topological insulators. InAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, volume 18, pages 1833–1866. Springer, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    The spectral flow of a family of toeplitz operators, 2018

    Maxim Braverman. The spectral flow of a family of toeplitz operators, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Anderson localization for Bernoulli and other singular potentials.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 108(1):41–66, 1987

    Ren´ e Carmona, Abel Klein, and Fabio Martinelli. Anderson localization for Bernoulli and other singular potentials.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 108(1):41–66, 1987

    1987

  18. [26]

    Anderson localization in discrete random displacements models.Journal of Statistical Physics, 190(1):5, 2023

    Victor Chulaevsky. Anderson localization in discrete random displacements models.Journal of Statistical Physics, 190(1):5, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Combes and Peter D

    Jean M. Combes and Peter D. Hislop. Localization for some continuous, random hamiltonians in d- dimensions.Journal of Functional Analysis, 124(1):149–180, 1994

    1994

  20. [28]

    Cornean, Massimo Moscolari, and Stefan Teufel

    Horia D. Cornean, Massimo Moscolari, and Stefan Teufel. From orbital magnetism to bulk-edge corre- spondence. InAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, pages 1–55. Springer, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Localization near the edge for the Anderson Bernoulli model on the two dimensional lattice.Inventiones mathematicae, 219(2):467–506, 2020

    Jian Ding and Charles K Smart. Localization near the edge for the Anderson Bernoulli model on the two dimensional lattice.Inventiones mathematicae, 219(2):467–506, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Microlocal analysis of the bulk-edge correspondence.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 383:2069–2112, 2021

    Alexis Drouot. Microlocal analysis of the bulk-edge correspondence.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 383:2069–2112, 2021

  23. [31]

    The bulk-edge correspondence for curved interfaces, 2024

    Alexis Drouot and Xiaowen Zhu. The bulk-edge correspondence for curved interfaces, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Graf, and Jeffrey H

    Alexander Elgart, Gian M. Graf, and Jeffrey H. Schenker. Equality of the bulk and edge Hall conductances in a mobility gap.Communications in mathematical physics, 259(1):185–221, 2005

    2005

  25. [33]

    Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensional topological insu- lators.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 324:851–895, 2013

    Gian Michele Graf and Marcello Porta. Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensional topological insu- lators.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 324:851–895, 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    The bulk-edge correspondence for disordered chiral chains.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 363:829–846, 2018

    Gian Michele Graf and Jacob Shapiro. The bulk-edge correspondence for disordered chiral chains.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 363:829–846, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:013904, Jan 2008

    2008

  28. [36]

    Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect.Phys

    Yasuhiro Hatsugai. Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect.Phys. Rev. Lett., 71:3697–3700, Nov 1993

    1993

  29. [37]

    Estimating bulk and edge topological indices in finite open chiral chains.J

    Lucien Jezequel, Cl´ ement Tauber, and Pierre Delplace. Estimating bulk and edge topological indices in finite open chiral chains.J. Math. Phys., 63(12), 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    Tosio Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators, volume 132. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  31. [39]

    Kellendonk, T

    J. Kellendonk, T. Richter, and H. Schulz-Baldes. Edge current channels and Chern numbers in the integer quantum Hall effect.Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 14(01):87–119, 2002

    2002

  32. [40]

    Boundary maps for C*-crossed products with an ap- plication to the quantum Hall effect.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 249:611–637, 2004

    Johannes Kellendonk and Hermann Schulz-Baldes. Boundary maps for C*-crossed products with an ap- plication to the quantum Hall effect.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 249:611–637, 2004

    2004

  33. [41]

    Quantization of edge currents for continuous magnetic operators.Journal of Functional Analysis, 209:388–413, 06 2004

    Johannes Kellendonk and Hermann Schulz-Baldes. Quantization of edge currents for continuous magnetic operators.Journal of Functional Analysis, 209:388–413, 06 2004

    2004

  34. [42]

    An invitation to random Schr¨ odinger operators.arXiv preprint arXiv:0709.3707, 2007

    Werner Kirsch. An invitation to random Schr¨ odinger operators.arXiv preprint arXiv:0709.3707, 2007

    2007 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Anderson localization for random Schr¨ odinger oper- ators with long range interactions.Communications in mathematical physics, 195(3):495–507, 1998

    Werner Kirsch, Peter Stollmann, and G¨ unter Stolz. Anderson localization for random Schr¨ odinger oper- ators with long range interactions.Communications in mathematical physics, 195(3):495–507, 1998

    1998

  36. [44]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine- structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance.Phys. Rev. Lett., 45:494–497, Aug 1980

    1980

  37. [45]

    A note on Anderson localization for the random hopping model

    Fr´ ed´ eric Klopp and Shu Nakamura. A note on Anderson localization for the random hopping model. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 44:4975–4980, 2003

    2003

  38. [46]

    Anderson localization for 2d discrete Schr¨ odinger operators with random magnetic fields.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 4(4):795–811, 2003

    Fr´ ed´ eric Klopp, Shu Nakamura, Fumihiko Nakano, and Yuji Nomura. Anderson localization for 2d discrete Schr¨ odinger operators with random magnetic fields.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 4(4):795–811, 2003

    2003

  39. [47]

    Controlled topological phases and bulk-edge correspondence.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 349(2):493–525, 2017

    Yosuke Kubota. Controlled topological phases and bulk-edge correspondence.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 349(2):493–525, 2017

    2017

  40. [48]

    Anderson–Bernoulli localization on the three-dimensional lattice and discrete unique continuation principle.Duke mathematical journal, 171(2):327–415, 2022

    Linjun Li and Lingfu Zhang. Anderson–Bernoulli localization on the three-dimensional lattice and discrete unique continuation principle.Duke mathematical journal, 171(2):327–415, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Mathematical theory for topological photonic materials in one dimension

    Junshan Lin and Hai Zhang. Mathematical theory for topological photonic materials in one dimension. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(49):495203, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Cobordism invariance of topological edge-following states

    Matthias Ludewig and Guo Chuan Thiang. Cobordism invariance of topological edge-following states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08339, 2020. BULK-EDGE CORRESPONDENCE FOR FINITE DISORDERED SYSTEMS 35

    2001 arXiv

  43. [51]

    2-dimensional localization of acoustic waves in random perturbation of periodic media

    Hatem Najar. 2-dimensional localization of acoustic waves in random perturbation of periodic media. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 322(1):1–17, 2006

    2006

  44. [52]

    Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu, Mikael C

    Tomoki Ozawa, Hannah M. Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu, Mikael C. Rechtsman, David Schuster, Jonathan Simon, Oded Zilberberg, and Iacopo Carusotto. Topological pho- tonics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 91:015006, Mar 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Prado, C´ esar R

    Roberto A. Prado, C´ esar R. de Oliveira, and Silas L. Carvalho. Dynamical localization for discrete An- derson Dirac operators.Journal of Statistical Physics, 167(2):260–296, 2017

    2017

  46. [54]

    Prado, C´ esar R

    Roberto A. Prado, C´ esar R. de Oliveira, and Edmundo C. de Oliveira. Density of states and lifshitz tails for discrete 1d random Dirac operators.Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 24(3):30, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Bulk and boundary invariants for complex topological insula- tors.K, 2016

    Emil Prodan and Hermann Schulz-Baldes. Bulk and boundary invariants for complex topological insula- tors.K, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 74(8):085308, 2006

    Xiao-Liang Qi, Yong-Shi Wu, and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 74(8):085308, 2006

    2006

  49. [57]

    Topological insulators and superconductors.Rev

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang. Topological insulators and superconductors.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:1057–1110, Oct 2011

    2011

  50. [58]

    Bulk-edge correspondence in finite photonic structure.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15531, 2025

    Jiayu Qiu and Hai Zhang. Bulk-edge correspondence in finite photonic structure.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15531, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Generalized bulk-interface correspondence for non-quantized spin transport

    Jiayu Qiu and Hai Zhang. Generalized bulk-interface correspondence for non-quantized spin transport. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16331, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Topological photonic alloy.Physical Review Letters, 132(22):223802, 2024

    Tiantao Qu, Mudi Wang, Xiaoyu Cheng, Xiaohan Cui, Ruo-Yang Zhang, Zhao-Qing Zhang, Lei Zhang, Jun Chen, and CT Chan. Topological photonic alloy.Physical Review Letters, 132(22):223802, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Richter and H

    T. Richter and H. Schulz-Baldes. Homotopy arguments for quantized Hall conductivity.Journal of Math- ematical Physics, 42(8):3439–3444, 08 2001

    2001

  54. [62]

    Band edge localization beyond regular Floquet eigenvalues

    Albrecht Seelmann and Matthias T¨ aufer. Band edge localization beyond regular Floquet eigenvalues. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 21:2151–2166, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Weinstein

    Jacob Shapiro and Michael I. Weinstein. Tight-binding reduction and topological equivalence in strong magnetic fields.Advances in Mathematics, 403:108343, 2022

    2022

  56. [64]

    Silveirinha

    M´ ario G. Silveirinha. Proof of the bulk-edge correspondence through a link between topological photonics and fluctuation-electrodynamics.Phys. Rev. X, 9:011037, Feb 2019

    2019

  57. [65]

    Nonlinearity- induced topological phase transition characterized by the nonlinear Chern number.Nature Physics, 20(7):1164–1170, 2024

    Kazuki Sone, Motohiko Ezawa, Yuto Ashida, Nobuyuki Yoshioka, and Takahiro Sagawa. Nonlinearity- induced topological phase transition characterized by the nonlinear Chern number.Nature Physics, 20(7):1164–1170, 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

    Peter Stollmann.Caught by disorder: bound states in random media, volume 20. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

    2001

  59. [67]

    An introduction to the mathematics of Anderson localization.Entropy and the quantum II

    G¨ unter Stolz. An introduction to the mathematics of Anderson localization.Entropy and the quantum II. Contemp. Math, 552:71–108, 2011

    2011

  60. [68]

    Equality of bulk and edge Hall conductances for continuous magnetic random Schr¨ odinger operators, 2014

    Amal Taarabt. Equality of bulk and edge Hall conductances for continuous magnetic random Schr¨ odinger operators, 2014

    2014

  61. [69]

    Bulk-interface correspondences for one-dimensional topological ma- terials with inversion symmetry.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2270):20220675, 2023

    Guo Chuan Thiang and Hai Zhang. Bulk-interface correspondences for one-dimensional topological ma- terials with inversion symmetry.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2270):20220675, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Veseli´ c

    I. Veseli´ c. Localization for random perturbations of periodic Schr¨ odinger operators with regular Floquet eigenvalues.Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 3:389–409, 2002

    2002

  63. [71]

    40 years of the quantum Hall effect.Nature Reviews Physics, 2(8):397–401, Aug 2020

    Klaus von Klitzing, Tapash Chakraborty, Philip Kim, Vidya Madhavan, Xi Dai, James McIver, Yoshinori Tokura, Lucile Savary, Daria Smirnova, Ana Maria Rey, Claudia Felser, Johannes Gooth, and Xiaoliang Qi. 40 years of the quantum Hall effect.Nature Reviews Physics, 2(8):397–401,...

    2020

  64. [72]

    Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c

    Zheng Wang, Yidong Chong, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states.Nature, 461(7265):772–775, 2009

    2009

  65. [73]

    Zworski.Semiclassical Analysis

    M. Zworski.Semiclassical Analysis. Graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2012. 36 HABIB AMMARI AND JIAYU QIU (H. Ammari)Department of Mathematics, ETH Z¨urich, R¨amistrasse 101, CH-8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland; Hong Kong Institute for Advanced Study, Cit...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.