Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 102 references

An atom near a hollow fiber feels a force whose distance law is set by the shell thickness and material type.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:48 UTC pith:VKUVLVPC

load-bearing objection Strong thin-wire Casimir-Polder asymptotics for hollow-core fibers, but the room-temperature ohmic/non-ohmic visibility claim is killed by the Matsubara spacing; still worth reviewing. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.11603 v2 pith:VKUVLVPC submitted 2025-12-12 quant-ph

The Casimir-Polder interaction between atoms and hollow-core fibers

Bettina Beverungen , Daniel Reiche , Kurt Busch , Francesco Intravaia This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords Casimir-Polder interactionhollow-core fibercylindrical shellthin-wire limitpenetration depthohmic vs non-ohmic conductorssuperconductorsthermal Casimir-Polder effect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the Casimir-Polder force between an atom and a hollow cylindrical shell, the standard model of hollow-core optical fibers, and demonstrates that the shell thickness is a genuine control parameter for the interaction. In the thin-wire limit—atom–fiber separations much larger than the fiber radius—the free energy develops distinct distance laws depending on whether the shell is a dielectric, an ohmic conductor, or a superconductor. Shell thickness acts by renormalizing the material's effective electromagnetic penetration depth (Δ0→Δ0√(1−χ²), λp→λp√(1−χ²), λD→λD/(1−χ²)), so thinner shells strengthen the signatures that tell ohmic from non-ohmic conductors and move those signatures to shorter distances. At finite temperature and very large distances, all conductors behave as perfect conductors and both material and thickness information disappear. A sympathetic reader would care because the result gives experimenters a geometric dial for controlling atom–fiber forces in quantum technology and for probing the long-standing ohmic-conductor controversy in Casimir physics.

Core claim

At zero temperature and in the thin-wire limit (distance L much larger than outer radius R0), the Casimir-Polder free energy is dominated by the lowest cylindrical scattering orders. For dielectrics it scales as R0^2/L^5 in the nonretarded regime and R0^2/L^6 in the retarded regime, with strength proportional to the cross-sectional area R0^2−Ri^2. Conductors behave differently: a superconducting shell gives a logarithmic law ∝L^-4 ln(L/R0) that eventually merges with the perfect-conductor limit, while an ohmic shell gives a steeper law ∝R0^2/(λD L^5)(8 ln(...)−5) with a characteristic double logarithm, λD being the field-diffusion length. The central renormalization is that a hollow shell re

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimensionless relative penetration depth Δ(iξ)=1/√(ϵ(iξ)−1), which classifies materials by their low-frequency behavior: a constant for dielectrics, √(λD/cξ) for ohmic conductors, and λpξ/c for superconductors. In the thin-wire limit s=R0/L≪1 the cylindrical scattering coefficients simplify: the m=0 electric (NN) channel carries the conductor physics, while m≥1 channels behave like slab reflections with χ=R_i/R0 acting as the round-trip factor. The paper shows that a hollow shell effectively renormalizes the material parameters as Δ0→Δ0√(1−χ²), λp→λp√(1−χ²), λD→λD/(1−χ²), and this renormalization is what lets shell thickness control both the interaction strength and

Load-bearing premise

The ohmic-vs-non-ohmic distinction rests on the assumption that the low-frequency penetration-depth laws of Eq. (5) remain valid over all imaginary frequencies that contribute to the retarded and thermal integrals, an assumption real materials may violate through interband transitions, nonlocal response, or finite-temperature scattering.

What would settle it

Compute Eq. (10) directly with tabulated experimental permittivity data—rather than the low-frequency asymptotics of Eq. (5)—for a thin-walled noble-metal or doped-semiconductor fiber and compare the free energy with Eqs. (30), (33), and (37). If the ohmic and non-ohmic distance laws do not separate in the predicted region, or if an experiment finds the thermal ∝−kBT L^-3 ln(L/R0) law at separations well below λT, the central claim is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For a hollow-core fiber made of a dielectric, the free energy decays as ∝L^-5 (nonretarded, thin-wire) and ∝L^-6 (retarded), with strength proportional to the shell's cross-sectional area; this is a testable prediction for atom-nanofiber experiments.
  • For conducting shells, the ohmic case has a distinct double-logarithmic distance law that is steeper than the superconducting and perfect-conductor laws; the distance at which this law appears is controlled by d through s_D.
  • Thinner shells increase the effective diffusion length λD/(1−χ²), making the ohmic signature visible at shorter separations; thus wall thickness is a practical tuning knob.
  • At separations beyond λT, all conductors give the same perfect-conductor law ∝−kBT L^-3 ln(L/R0), so observing the material-specific regimes requires distances well below the thermal length.
  • The full-cylinder results are recovered as the internal radius goes to zero (χ=0), and planar-slab results are recovered when the atom-surface distance is much smaller than the cylinder radius; the asymptotic formulas therefore interpolate between known geometries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same Green tensor is used, the thickness renormalization should also appear in other cylindrical-shell fluctuation phenomena, such as near-field radiative heat transfer and electron-energy-loss spectroscopy, giving those fields a new control parameter.
  • Real materials deviate from the asymptotic frequency behavior used here—interband transitions, nonlocal response, and finite-temperature quasiparticle scattering can alter Δ at relevant frequencies—so the precise forms of the logarithmic laws are likely model-dependent even if the qualitative distinction survives.
  • Existing cold-atom-in-nanofiber setups could test the predicted transition by measuring the atom's state shift versus distance, with poor conductors (long diffusion lengths) being the most forgiving test bed.
  • The thermal erasure of material information suggests a concrete experimental boundary: below roughly 0.24 K for the good-conductor case, the ohmic vs non-ohmic difference should reappear, a threshold that is shifted higher for poor conductors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a semi-analytical theory of the Casimir-Polder interaction between a polarizable atom and an infinitely extended hollow-core cylindrical shell. The authors derive the relevant scattered Green tensor and provide compact scattering coefficients, a numerical scheme based on Gaussian quadrature and modified discrete Laguerre summation, and extensive asymptotic expansions in the slab and thin-wire limits. For the thin-wire limit they derive distinct distance laws for dielectrics, ohmic conductors, and superconductors, and show that the shell thickness effectively renormalizes the material penetration-depth parameters. They also analyze finite-temperature corrections, finding that at sufficiently large distances conductors behave as perfect conductors and lose the material and thickness information. The central claimed result is that the shell thickness provides an experimentally useful knob for controlling the interaction and for distinguishing ohmic from non-ohmic conductor response.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper supplies a systematic and fairly complete account of Casimir-Polder interactions for a geometry relevant to nanofibers, hollow-core fibers, and nanowires. The derivation is parameter-free in the sense that no constants are fitted to the target results; the material and atomic inputs come from standard models and cited literature. The explicit asymptotic formulas, the renormalization rule for the effective penetration depth, and the proposed numerical quadrature scheme are useful and testable. The main weakness is a finite-temperature overclaim: the room-temperature visibility of the ohmic signature is not supported by the model parameters actually used.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V (paragraph after Fig. 6)] The statement that, for the hollow-core cylinder, the ohmic/non-ohmic distinction 'should be visible even at room temperature or higher' is not supported by the model. The ohmic effect relies on the low-frequency asymptotic Δ∼√(λ_D ξ/c) in Eq. (5), which holds only for ξ≪γ. For the ZnO:Ga parameters used in Fig. 6, γ=0.118 eV, while at T=300 K the first nonzero Matsubara frequency is ξ₁=2πk_BT/ħ≈0.16 eV, i.e. ξ₁>γ. Thus the n=1 term samples the plasma-like high-frequency side of the Drude model rather than the square-root regime, and the n=0 term is material-blind. The shell-thickness renormalization in Eq. (18) changes the effective λ_D and s_D, but it does not change γ or the Matsubara spacing. A room-temperature claim therefore requires an explicit evaluation of Eq. (40) at T=300 K or a quantitative argument that the residual Drude/plasma difference at ξ₁ reproduces the zero-temperatu
  2. [Eq. (5) and surrounding discussion] The paper notes that some permittivity models plateau at large ξ rather than following Δ∝ξ, but it dismisses this as irrelevant without a quantitative analysis. This matters for the finite-temperature and retarded regimes, because the Matsubara sum or frequency integral may sample frequencies where the exact Drude Δ differs from the asymptotic form. In particular, for ξ∼γ the exact Drude Δ is neither the square-root asymptote nor the perfect-conductor limit; for ξ≫γ it approaches 1/√(ε∞−1) instead of diverging. Since the claimed ohmic signature depends on the square-root frequency dependence, the impact of these deviations should be assessed explicitly, for example by comparing Eq. (37) with the exact Drude model under the stated validity conditions and for parameters where ξ₁∼γ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV A 1, after Eq. (22)] The sentence 'we have verified its consistency with a numerical evaluation using other parameters (not shown)' is not reproducible. Either provide the data/plot or remove the assertion; as written it is an unverified supporting claim.
  2. [Section III / Fig. 2] The direct-summation curves are described as dotted dark gray lines but are difficult to distinguish in the figure. Please improve the contrast or use different markers so the convergence comparison can be checked visually.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (B5)] The notation γ′_E appears in Eq. (B5) without definition, while the text elsewhere uses γ̃_E (Eq. (16)) and γ_E. Please unify the notation.
  4. [Section II A] The statement that the plateau deviation of Δ at large ξ 'does not impact the following considerations' should be made more precise. At minimum, state explicitly which results are independent of the high-frequency behavior and which rely on the low-frequency asymptotic conditions.
  5. [Section V] The room-temperature sentence should be cross-referenced to the Matsubara-frequency argument in the major comment; as written, it could mislead readers into thinking the T=4 K results in Figs. 5–6 automatically extend to 300 K.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the asymptotic Casimir-Polder laws are derived from the standard Green-tensor formalism and explicit material permittivity models, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The starting point is the standard scattered Green tensor for a multilayer cylinder (Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A3), with scattering coefficients in Eqs. (8)/(A7)), and the Casimir-Polder free energy in Eqs. (1)-(2) is a standard second-order result cited to an external textbook [25] as well as a review [45]. The material dependence enters through explicit permittivity models (Eq. (6)) and the low-frequency classification of the relative penetration depth (Eq. (5)); these are inputs, stated as assumptions, and are not obtained from the target distance laws. The asymptotic expressions (22), (24), (27)-(37), (41)-(42) are obtained by saddle-point/asymptotic evaluation of the same expression for F, and the paper validates them against direct numerical evaluation of Eq. (10)/(40) and against known planar/slab limits. No parameter is fitted to the predicted power laws; material parameters are taken from the literature. Self-citations in the reference list (e.g., [45], [52], [74], [87], [88]) are used for standard formulas, analogies, or contextual applications and are not load-bearing for the central derivation; there is no imported uniqueness theorem and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The reviewer's thermal-masking concern is a possible validity-regime/correctness issue of the room-temperature claim, not a circularity: it does not mean the output is equivalent to the input by construction. Overall, no circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; the relative penetration depth Δ is a convenient dimensionless variable, not a new degree of freedom. The material parameters used in figures are taken from cited external references rather than fitted to the paper's own results. The main axioms are the standard macroscopic QED formalism, local-response material modeling, and the asymptotic/saddle-point approximations used to obtain closed-form expressions.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Casimir-Polder free energy is given by Eq. (1)/(2): trace of polarizability with the scattered Green tensor, to second order in atom-field coupling.
    Standard macroscopic QED result; used as the starting point in Section II.
  • domain assumption Material is spatially local, isotropic, and nonmagnetic with frequency-dependent permittivity ε(iξ); the atom polarizability is isotropic.
    Section II; central results depend on this simplification. Nonlocal response would modify the scattering coefficients.
  • domain assumption Low-frequency asymptotics of the relative penetration depth Δ in Eq. (5): dielectrics constant, ohmic conductors ~√(λ_D/c ξ), superconductors ~λ_p ξ/c.
    Load-bearing for the ohmic vs non-ohmic distinction; follows from Drude/plasma models, not from a first-principles material calculation.
  • standard math For s≪1, the η-integral is dominated by η≈1 and only m=0,1 terms contribute; the saddle-point approximation g(sη)f(η) ≈ g(sη₀)∫f(η)dη is valid, including for integrands with logarithmic factors.
    Used to derive Eqs. (25), (27), (29), (30), (32), (33), and (37). The paper does not rigorously prove uniform validity.
  • domain assumption For L≫λ_T, only the n=0 Matsubara term contributes to the finite-temperature free energy.
    Standard in thermal Casimir physics; used in Section V to derive the perfect-conductor-like behavior of Eq. (42).
  • domain assumption The structure is an infinitely extended, perfectly cylindrical shell with sharp boundaries and no surface roughness or finite-length effects.
    Idealization stated in Fig. 1 and the Introduction; real hollow-core fibers may deviate.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 40529 in / 11048 out tokens · 101947 ms · 2026-08-03T16:48:29.122228+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Casimir-Polder force acts on polarizable particles due to quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field that are modified by the presence of material bodies. We investigate the Casimir-Polder interaction for atoms near cylindrical fibers with hollow cores. This geometry represents one of the archetypal configurations encountered in numerous experimental setups designed to control and manipulate atoms in fundamental and quantum technological applications. Specifically, we analyze how the interplay of both geometrical and material-related length scales characterize the interaction, emphasizing the impact of the shell thickness. We develop a flexible and fast-converging numerical scheme for evaluating the interaction over a wide range of atom-cylinder separations at both zero and finite temperature. Furthermore, we provide a detailed analytical investigation of how various material properties modify the Casimir-Polder potential. Finally, we analyze and discuss a number of limiting cases and compare numerical computations with corresponding analytical asymptotic expressions. In particular, in this geometry the Casimir-Polder potential is able to distinguish between an ohmic and non-ohmic description of conductors. One of the most significant outcomes of our work is that the shell thickness emerges as a useful parameter for controlling the interaction, opening avenues for both fundamental physics and applications in quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.11603 by Bettina Beverungen, Daniel Reiche, Francesco Intravaia, Kurt Busch.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The system considered in this work. An atom in vac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of direct summation (dotted dark gray lines) and MDL quadrature (dark blue lines, see Section III) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Zero-temperature Casimir-Polder potential for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , the strength of the interaction for the correspond￾ing value of sD is very similar. When the parameters used for the structure are those of a poor conductor, the interplay between geometry and material properties has a more prominent effect. Once again, at short atom-cylinder separations the ohmic material and its superconducting variant behave almost identically. The potential follows the corresponding … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Casimir-Polder free energy for a Rubidium atom in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Finite-temperature Casimir-Polder free energy for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Scattering coefficients for a cylindrical shell For the specific case of a cylindrical shell, the ex- pressions for the scattering coefficients are provided in Eqs. (8). For convenience we reproduce them here in terms of the original variablesξ,κandκ ϵ: rNN m = ϵΦ(ϵ) m − κϵ κ im(κR0 ) im(κϵ R0 ) Π21m + q ξ c κ2 ∆2 m κϵ R0 im (κϵ R0 ) 2 Φ(1) m − κϵ κ km(κR...

  2. [2]

    Approximate form of the scattering coefficients Definingχ=R i/R0 and using thatη≈1, and ζ∈(0,1), the auxiliary functions defined in Eqs. (A8) simplify fors≪1 as follows Φ(ϵ) m ∼    1−χ2+∆2 1+∆2 m= 0 (1+ 1 ∆2 )+ 1+χ2m 1−χ2m 1+ ζ2 ∆2 (1+ 1 ∆2 ) 1+χ2m 1−χ2m + 1+ ζ2 ∆2 m̸= 0, (B1a) Φ(1) m ∼    1m= 0 1+ 1+χ2m 1−χ2m 1+ ζ2 ∆2 1+χ2m 1−χ2m + 1+ ζ...

  3. [3]

    (5), depending on the material, the behavior of ∆ can be quite different, deeply affect- ing the asymptotic behavior of the Casimir-Polder free energy

    The Casimir-Polder free energy in the thin-wire limit As discussed before Eq. (5), depending on the material, the behavior of ∆ can be quite different, deeply affect- ing the asymptotic behavior of the Casimir-Polder free energy. This is particularly evident in the expression for rNN 0 . Indeed, for dielectrics the function ∆ has a positive lower bound fo...

  4. [4]

    Integral overζ As noted in the main text, the integration overζin Eq

    Zero temperature interaction a. Integral overζ As noted in the main text, the integration overζin Eq. (10) contains an integrable square root singularity atζ= 1. In principle, this could be treated directly by a specialized half-range Chebyshev-Gauss quadrature rule based on Chebyshev-like polynomials defined on the range [0,1] [95]. Here, we instead tran...

  5. [5]

    (2) and (40)

    Finite temperature interaction We shall briefly summarize the necessary modifica- tions to include finite-temperature effects in the numer- ical evaluation according to Eqs. (2) and (40). With re- spect to the zero temperature case, the major difference in the mathematical expressions arises from the formal replacement of the integral over imaginary frequ...

  6. [6]

    W. E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford, Fine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method, Phys. Rev.72, 241 (1947)

    1947

  7. [7]

    H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, The Influence of Retar- dation on the London-van der Waals Forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948)

    1948

  8. [8]

    Reichel, W

    J. Reichel, W. H¨ ansel, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Atomic Micro- manipulation with Magnetic Surface Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3398 (1999)

    1999

  9. [9]

    Fort´ agh and C

    J. Fort´ agh and C. Zimmermann, Magnetic microtraps for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 235 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    Henkel, inAtom Chips, edited by J

    C. Henkel, inAtom Chips, edited by J. Reichel and V. Vuleti´ c (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Wein- heim, Germany, 2011), Chap. 5. Interaction of atoms, ions and molecules with surfaces

    2011

  11. [11]

    M. Keil, O. Amit, S. Zhou, D. Groswasser, Y. Japha, and R. Folman, Fifteen years of cold matter on the atom chip: promise, realizations, and prospects, J. Mod. Optics63, 1840 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagu´ e, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical Interface Cre- ated by Laser-Cooled Atoms Trapped in the Evanescent Field Surrounding an Optical Nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203603 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Solano, P

    P. Solano, P. Barberis-Blostein, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Super-radiance reveals infinite-range dipole interactions through a nanofiber, Nat. Commun.8, 1857 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    Le Kien, S

    F. Le Kien, S. S. S. Hejazi, V. G. Truong, S. Nic Chor- maic, and T. Busch, Chiral force of guided light on an atom, Phys. Rev. A97, 063849 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Pennetta, A

    R. Pennetta, A. Glicenstein, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz and A. Rauschenbeutel, Hybrid Trapping of Cold Atoms with Surface Forces and Blue-Detuned Evanescent Light on a Nanophotonic Waveguide, arXiv:2509.17767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Langbecker, M

    M. Langbecker, M. Noaman, N. Kjærgaard, F. Ben- abid, and P. Windpassinger, Rydberg excitation of cold atoms inside a hollow-core fiber, Phys. Rev. A96, 041402 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Le Kien, D

    F. Le Kien, D. F. Kornovan, S. Nic Chormaic, and T. Busch, Repulsive Casimir-Polder potentials of low-lying excited states of a multilevel alkali-metal atom near an optical nanofiber, Physical Review A105, 042817 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Fermani, S

    R. Fermani, S. Scheel, and P. L. Knight, Trapping cold atoms near carbon nanotubes: Thermal spin flips and Casimir-Polder potential, Phys. Rev. A75, 062905 (2007). 26

    2007

  19. [19]

    Gierlinget al., Cold-atom scanning probe microscopy, Nat

    M. Gierlinget al., Cold-atom scanning probe microscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol.6, 446 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Schneeweiss, M

    P. Schneeweiss, M. Gierling, G. Visanescu, D. P. Kern, T. E. Judd, A. Gunther, and J. Fortagh, Dispersion forces between ultracold atoms and a carbon nanotube, Nat. Nanotechnol.7, 515 (2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    Folman, P

    R. Folman, P. Kr¨ uger, J. Schmiedmayer, J. H. Denschlag, and C. Henkel, Microscopic atom optics: from wires to an atom chip, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 263 (2002)

    2002

  22. [22]

    Hunger, S

    D. Hunger, S. Camerer, T. W. H¨ ansch, D. K¨ onig, J. P. Kotthaus, J. Reichel, and P. Treutlein, Resonant Cou- pling of a Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Micromechani- cal Oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 143002 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    H¨ ummer, O

    D. H¨ ummer, O. Romero-Isart, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Schneeweiss, Probing Surface-Bound Atoms with Quantum Nanophotonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 163601 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Y. Meng, A. Dareau, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschen- beutel, Near-Ground-State Cooling of Atoms Optically Trapped 300 nm Away from a Hot Surface, Phys. Rev. X8, 031054 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Lechner, R

    D. Lechner, R. Pennetta, M. Blaha, P. Schneeweiss, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. Volz, Light-Matter Interaction at the Transition between Cavity and Waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 103603 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Bostr¨ om and B

    M. Bostr¨ om and B. E. Sernelius, van der Waals energy of an atom in the proximity of thin metal films, Physical Review A61, 052703 (2000)

    2000

  28. [28]

    A. M. Contreras Reyes and C. Eberlein, Casimir-Polder interaction between an atom and a dielectric slab, Phys. Rev. A80, 032901 (2009)

    2009

  29. [29]

    Dufour, A

    G. Dufour, A. G´ erardin, R. Gu´ erout, A. Lambrecht, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Reynaud, and A. Y. Voronin, Quantum reflection of antihydrogen from the Casimir potential above matter slabs, Phys. Rev. A87, 012901 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    S. Y. Buhmann,Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir–Polder and van der Waals Forces(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013), Vol. 247

    2013

  31. [31]

    V. M. Nabutovskii, V. R. Belosludov, and A. M. Ko- rotkikh, Interaction potential between small neutral par- ticles and spherical or cylindrical surfaces, Sov. Phys. JETP50, 352 (1979)

    1979

  32. [32]

    A. M. Marvin and F. Toigo, van der Waals interaction between a point particle and a metallic surface. I. Theory, Physical Review A25, 782 (1982)

    1982

  33. [33]

    Y. S. Barash, Van der Waals interaction between thin conducting layers, Fizika Tverdogo Tela30, 2738 (1988)

    1988

  34. [34]

    Y. S. Barash and O. I. Notych, Long-range correlations in a liquid filling a thin slit or pore, Sov. Phys. JETP71, 301 (1990), originally published in Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 98 Vol. 2

    1990

  35. [35]

    Eberlein and R

    C. Eberlein and R. Zietal, Force on a neutral atom near conducting microstructures, Physical Review A75, 032516 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Eberlein and R

    C. Eberlein and R. Zietal, Retarded Casimir-Polder force on an atom near reflecting microstructures, Physical Re- view A80, 012504 (2009)

    2009

  37. [37]

    V. B. Bezerra, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, G. L. Klimchit- skaya, V. M. Mostepanenko, and A. A. Saharian, Ex- act Casimir–Polder potential between a particle and an ideal metal cylindrical shell and the proximity force ap- proximation, The European Physical Journal C71, 1614 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On the attraction between two per- fectly conducting plates, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet.51, 793 (1948)

    1948

  39. [39]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Theory of Interaction Between an Atom and a Metal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 22 (1935), reprinted in Selected Works of Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich, Volume I: Chemical Physics and Hydrodynamics, Ch. III.11 by Princeton University Press (1992)

    1935

  40. [40]

    Y. S. Barash and A. A. Kyasov, Interaction potential for two filaments and for an atom interacting with a filament, Sov. Phys. JETP68, 39 (1989)

    1989

  41. [41]

    Stourm, M

    E. Stourm, M. Lepers, J. Robert, S. Nic Chormaic, K. Mølmer, and E. Brion, Spontaneous emission and energy shifts of a Rydberg rubidium atom close to an optical nanofiber, Phys. Rev. A101, 052508 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Bostr¨ om and B

    M. Bostr¨ om and B. E. Sernelius, Fractional van der Waals interaction between thin metallic films, Phys. Rev. B61, 2204 (2000)

    2000

  43. [43]

    Pirozhenko and A

    I. Pirozhenko and A. Lambrecht, Influence of slab thick- ness on the Casimir force, Phys. Rev. A77, 013811 (2008)

    2008

  44. [44]

    Sch¨ utzet al., Biprism electron interferometry with a single atom tip source, Ultramicroscopy141, 9 (2014)

    G. Sch¨ utzet al., Biprism electron interferometry with a single atom tip source, Ultramicroscopy141, 9 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    O. A. Schmidt, T. G. Euser, and P. S. Russell, Mode- based microparticle conveyor belt in air-filled hollow-core photonic crystal fiber, Opt. Express21, 29383 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Epple, K

    G. Epple, K. S. Kleinbach, T. G. Euser, N. Y. Joly, T. Pfau, P. S. J. Russell, and R. L¨ ow, Rydberg atoms in hollow-core photonic crystal fibres, Nat. Commun.5, 4132 (2014)

    2014

  47. [47]

    D. S. Bykov, O. A. Schmidt, T. G. Euser, and P. S. J. Russell, Flying particle sensors in hollow-core photonic crystal fibre, Nat. Photon.9, 461 (2015)

    2015

  48. [48]

    E. V. Blagov, G. L. Klimchitskaya, and V. M. Mostepa- nenko, Van der Waals interaction between microparticle and uniaxial crystal with application to hydrogen atoms and multiwall carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B71, 235401 (2005). [44]Casimir Physics, Vol. 834 ofLecture Notes in Physics, edited by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, and F. da Rosa (Sprin...

    2005

  49. [49]

    Intravaia, C

    F. Intravaia, C. Henkel, and M. Antezza, Fluctuation- Induced Forces Between Atoms and Surfaces: The Casimir-Polder Interaction inCasimir Physics, Vol. 834 ofLecture Notes in Physics, edited by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, and F. da Rosa (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), Chap. 11, pp. 345–391

    2011

  50. [50]

    G. L. Klimchitskaya and V. M. Mostepanenko, Current status of the problem of thermal Casimir force, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics A37, 2241002 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    Tai,Dyadic Green Functions in Electromagnetic Theory,IEEE PRESS Series on Electromagnetic Waves (IEEE Press, New York, 1994)

    C.-T. Tai,Dyadic Green Functions in Electromagnetic Theory,IEEE PRESS Series on Electromagnetic Waves (IEEE Press, New York, 1994)

    1994

  52. [52]

    Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics(John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1975)

    J. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics(John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1975)

    1975

  53. [53]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, and L. Pitaevskii,Course of The- oretical Physics: Electrodinamics in Continuous Media, 2nd ed. (Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford, 1980)

    1980

  54. [54]

    H. J. H. Ma and J. F. Scott, Non-Ohmic Variable- Range Hopping and Resistive Switching in SrTiO 3 Do- main Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 146601 (2020). 27

    2020

  55. [55]

    London and H

    F. London and H. London, inProceedings of the Royal Society of London, No. 866 inSeries A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences (1934-1990)(JSTOR, London, 1935), pp. 71–88

    1934

  56. [56]

    Bimonte, H

    G. Bimonte, H. Haakh, C. Henkel, and F. Intravaia, Op- tical BCS conductivity at imaginary frequencies and dis- persion energies of superconductors, J. Phys. A Math. Theor.43, 145304 (2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    M. S. Tomaˇ s, Green function for multilayers: Light scat- tering in planar cavities, Physical Review A51, 2545 (1995)

    1995

  58. [58]

    L. Li, P. Kooi, M. Leong, and T. Yeo, Analytic repre- sentation of scattering dyadic Green’s functions’ coeffi- cients for cylindrically multilayered chiral media, Jour- nal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications9, 1207 (1995)

    1995

  59. [59]

    Li, M.-S

    L.-W. Li, M.-S. Leong, T.-S. Yeo, and P.-S. Kooi, Electro- magnetic Dyadic Green’s Functions in Spectral Domain for Multilayered Cylinders, Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications14, 961 (2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    Li, P.-S

    L.-W. Li, P.-S. Kooi, M.-S. Leong, and T.-S. Yee, Elec- tromagnetic dyadic Green’s function in spherically multi- layered media, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques42, 2302 (1994)

    1994

  61. [61]

    Mie, Beitr¨ age zur Optik tr¨ uber Medien, speziell kol- loidaler Metall¨ osungen, Ann

    G. Mie, Beitr¨ age zur Optik tr¨ uber Medien, speziell kol- loidaler Metall¨ osungen, Ann. Phys.330, 377 (1908)

    1908

  62. [62]

    Tzarouchis and A

    D. Tzarouchis and A. Sihvola, Light Scattering by a Di- electric Sphere: Perspectives on the Mie Resonances, Appl. Sci.8, (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman,Absorption and scat- tering of light by small particles(John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1983)

    1983

  64. [64]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. Stengun,Handbook of Mathemat- ical Functions(Dover Books, New York, 1971)

    1971

  65. [66]

    P. K. Rekdal, S. Scheel, P. L. Knight, and E. A. Hinds, Thermal spin flips in atom chips, Phys. Rev. A70, 013811 (2004)

    2004

  66. [67]

    Press, S

    W. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  67. [68]

    Xu and S

    G. Xu and S. G. Johnson, Modified discrete Laguerre polynomials for efficient computation of exponentially bounded Matsubara sums, arXiv:2101.01655

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    Engblom, Gaussian Quadratures with Respect to Dis- crete Measures, Technical Report No

    S. Engblom, Gaussian Quadratures with Respect to Dis- crete Measures, Technical Report No. 2006-007, Depart- ment of Information Technology, Uppsala University

    2006

  69. [70]

    Monien, Gaussian quadrature for sums: A rapidly convergent summation scheme, Mathematics of Compu- tation79, 857 (2010)

    H. Monien, Gaussian quadrature for sums: A rapidly convergent summation scheme, Mathematics of Compu- tation79, 857 (2010)

    2010

  70. [71]

    D. E. Amos, Algorithm 644: A portable package for Bessel functions of a complex argument and nonnegative order, ACM Trans. Math. Softw.12, 265–273 (1986)

    1986

  71. [72]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data, available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.1.5, 13 January 2015)

    2015

  72. [73]

    Pflug, M

    T. Pflug, M. Olbrich, and A. Horn, Electron dynamics in fused silica after strong field laser excitation detected by spectroscopic imaging pump-probe ellipsometry, Physical Review B106, 014307 (2022)

    2022

  73. [74]

    E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii,Statistical Physics, Part 2: Theory of the Condensed State(Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980)

    1980

  74. [75]

    Brevik, J

    I. Brevik, J. B. Aarseth, J. S. Høye, and K. A. Milton, Temperature dependence of the Casimir effect, Physical Review E71, 056101 (2005)

    2005

  75. [76]

    A. W. Rodriguez, F. Capasso, and S. G. Johnson, The Casimir effect in microstructured geometries, Nature Photonics5, 211 (2011)

    2011

  76. [77]

    Sipe, The dipole antenna problem in surface physics: A new approach, Surf

    J. Sipe, The dipole antenna problem in surface physics: A new approach, Surf. Sci.105, 489 (1981)

    1981

  77. [78]

    Oelschl¨ ager, K

    M. Oelschl¨ ager, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Nonequi- librium atom-surface interaction with lossy multilayer structures, Phys. Rev. A97, 062507 (2018)

    2018

  78. [79]

    R. O. Behuninet al., Kelvin probe force microscopy of metallic surfaces used in Casimir force measurements, Phys. Rev. A90, 062115 (2014)

    2014

  79. [80]

    Kalusniak, S

    S. Kalusniak, S. Sadofev, and F. Henneberger, ZnO as a Tunable Metal: New Types of Surface Plasmon Polari- tons, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 137401 (2014)

    2014

  80. [81]

    Das, Obtaining Wien’s displacement law from Planck’s law of radiation, The Physics Teacher40, 148 (2002)

    B. Das, Obtaining Wien’s displacement law from Planck’s law of radiation, The Physics Teacher40, 148 (2002)

    2002

Showing first 80 references.