Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 129 references

These lecture notes argue that the low-energy density and phase ripples of a Bose–Einstein condensate are, to a very good approximation, a massless scalar field living on an “acoustic spacetime” shaped by the condensate’s flow. They build t

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:14 UTC pith:JVL7EEOR

load-bearing objection An honest, pedagogically useful set of lecture notes: no new physics, but a careful bridge between BEC physics and QFT in curved spacetime, with genuinely soft spots only at the mechanical level (missing problem set, typos, no code). the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.14209 v2 pith:JVL7EEOR submitted 2025-12-16 gr-qc cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Analogue gravity with Bose-Einstein condensates

Adri\`a Delhom , Luca Giacomelli This is my paper
classification gr-qc cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords analogue gravityBose-Einstein condensateacoustic metricHawking radiationsuperradianceBogoliubov dispersionKlein-Gordon equationphonons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

These lecture notes argue that the low-energy density and phase ripples of a Bose–Einstein condensate are, to a very good approximation, a massless scalar field living on an “acoustic spacetime” shaped by the condensate’s flow. They build the full chain—from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and Bogoliubov excitations to the acoustic metric, quantization, and scattering theory—and then use it to show that stationary subsonic-to-supersonic flows must exhibit superradiance and a stationary analogue of Hawking radiation, with the emitted spectrum fixed by a non-unitary scattering matrix. A sympathetic reader should come away with a self-contained toolkit for computing analogue black-hole spectra and for connecting them to measurable density correlations.

Core claim

The central claim is that a condensate flowing through a sub-to-supersonic transition converts quantum vacuum fluctuations of its phase into correlated pairs of phonons, one escaping to the subsonic side and one falling into the supersonic region; this is the stationary Hawking effect. It is not a dynamical collapse effect: it is a fixed-frequency, norm-mixing scattering problem, allowed because the Bogoliubov dispersion supplies negative-norm modes in the supersonic region. The emitted spectrum is not exactly thermal—it has a hard cutoff at the frequency ω_max where the negative-norm branch disappears—but it reduces to the thermal Hawking form at low frequencies when the healing length is s

What carries the argument

The acoustic metric: a Lorentzian metric built from the local density, sound speed, and flow velocity of the condensate, such that the phase perturbation satisfies the Klein–Gordon equation □_g φ = 0 in the hydrodynamic regime. The other load-bearing tool is the Bogoliubov–de Gennes inner product (the symplectic product), which assigns positive or negative norm to modes; superradiance and Hawking emission occur exactly when scattering mixes modes of opposite norm at a fixed frequency, making the scattering matrix non-unitary.

Load-bearing premise

The whole acoustic-spacetime analogy rests on the hydrodynamic limit—perturbation wavelength and background gradient scale both much larger than the healing length—while the stationary Hawking effect itself requires the dispersive corrections that break that limit.

What would settle it

Measure the equal-time density-density correlation function G2(x,x′) across a BEC transonic horizon in a stationary waterfall, and look for the predicted diagonal “mustache” line from dn–out pairs with slope v_g^dn/v_g^out; simultaneously record the emission spectrum and check it vanishes above ω_max ≈ 0.1 μ/ħ for the step-interface parameters, with a 1/ω rise at low frequencies. If the correlation line is absent, or the spectrum extends well past the predicted cutoff, the stationary analogue Hawking effect fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, a BEC with a stationary waterfall (sub- to supersonic) should emit phonon pairs spontaneously, with the number per mode given by the squared scattering amplitudes |B_13|², |B_23|², |B_33|².
  • The analogue Hawking spectrum must cut off at ω_max; it cannot be thermal at all frequencies, so experiments should see a depletion of high-frequency emission compared with a Planck spectrum.
  • Superradiant amplification—a reflection or transmission coefficient exceeding one—should occur for frequencies ω < mΩ_H in a draining vortex and in a finite band in a shear layer.
  • In closed geometries (e.g. periodic boundary conditions), superradiance converts into a dynamical instability (“black hole lasing”) that should grow exponentially until nonlinearities take over, as the GPE numerics show.
  • Equal-time density-density correlations across the horizon should display the predicted “mustache” structure from entangled dn–out pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the stationary Hawking effect relies on superluminal Bogoliubov dispersion, the paper implies that any analogue “spacetime” is really a rainbow metric: high-momentum phonons do not share the acoustic lightcones. An experimental test could look for mode-dependent horizon positions by sending short-wavelength sound pulses across the transonic region.
  • The low-frequency 1/ω scaling of the step-interface spectrum suggests the dispersion-corrected Hawking temperature acquires a frequency dependence; measuring the correlation peak trajectories could map that dependence.
  • A concrete extension: seeding the supersonic region with a well-controlled squeezed input state should enhance the emitted signal, turning the spontaneous Hawking effect into a stimulated one while preserving the entanglement signature.
  • If the analogy is taken seriously for backreaction, the paper’s instability analysis provides a testbed for how quantum fields modify the background flow—a question that has no analogue in the non-dispersive gravitational case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a set of lecture notes on analogue gravity with atomic Bose–Einstein condensates. It develops the theoretical background from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation and Bogoliubov–de Gennes formalism, derives the acoustic metric in the hydrodynamic limit, and then uses the resulting effective field theory to discuss black-hole superradiance (classical and quantum) and the stationary analogue Hawking effect. The presentation is explicitly pedagogical, with derivations that often follow the standard literature (Unruh, Bogoliubov, Hawking) and with a few original or semi-analytical numerical examples, such as a shear layer, a step-interface horizon, and black-hole lasing. The notes are candid about the limitations of the analogy, in particular the hydrodynamic limit and the fact that the stationary Hawking effect relies on dispersive effects, unlike the gravitational effect.

Significance. If the notes are correct, they provide a useful, self-contained introduction to analogue gravity in BECs, connecting relativistic QFT concepts with condensed-matter techniques. The explicit derivations of the acoustic metric from density–phase perturbations, the symplectic product and its relation to the BdG inner product, and the scattering-matrix framework for superradiance and the Hawking effect are of pedagogical value. The numerical recipes (the scattering-coefficient algorithm in Appendix A and the split-step GPE scheme) will likely be useful to students and researchers. The paper is honest about the scope of the analogy, repeatedly flagging the hydrodynamic limit and the dispersive nature of the stationary Hawking effect. Overall, it is a solid contribution to the lecture-notes literature, though a few technical points need correction.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Eq. (93)] The canonical commutation relation [φ(t,x), η(t,x')] = -i/n0(t,x) δ(x-x') is missing a factor of ħ. Since π_φ = -ħ n0 η (Eq. (86)), the standard CCR [φ,π_φ] = i δ implies [φ,η] = -i/(ħ n0) δ. As written, the derivation of the ladder commutation relations (98) from (93) and (97) (used in Problem 6) is inconsistent. This is a load-bearing technical point in the quantization section; please restore the ħ and re-check the relevant definitions.
  2. [Throughout (Problems 3, 6, 7, 9)] The text repeatedly refers to a problem set (Problem 3 in §4.2, Problem 6 in §5.1, Problem 7 in §6.1, Problem 9 in §7.1.1), but the manuscript does not include the problem set. For a lecture-notes submission, the problems are an integral part of the pedagogical content. Either include the full problem set or remove the cross-references; leaving the references dangling is not acceptable.
  3. [§7.5.1, Eq. (170)] The split-step propagator is written as e^{-i H_G P Δt} with H_G P = K+W, but since K and W have units of energy, the exponent should be -i H Δt/ħ (or the scheme should be explicitly formulated in units with ħ=1). As written, the exponents in Eq. (170) and in the subsequent algorithm steps are dimensionally inconsistent. This is a pedagogical issue: please either introduce ħ consistently or state the convention ħ=1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§6.2, text near Eq. (126)] The sentence says 'only positive-energy modes are available at x→∞ and only negative-energy ones at x→∞'; the second limit should be x→−∞.
  2. [§7.2, text near Fig. 10] The phrase '|B_3j|² is the emission spectrum in mode j' is unclear/incorrect: if the ingoing d mode has index 3, the emission in outgoing mode i is |B_{i3}|², not |B_3j|². Please rephrase.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors (e.g., 'inply', 'Assymptotically', 'posstion', 'adition', 'unconfortable', 'regularizator', 'entnaglement', 'approxiation'). A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [§4.5, Eq. (88)] The notation f^{μν} is introduced as an operator between ∂_μ and ∂_ν, but the background dependence of the differential operator D^2_{n0} could be described more explicitly to avoid confusion between the local coefficient and the derivative operator.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the acoustic-metric, superradiance, and Hawking derivations are self-contained; self-citations are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The notes are a pedagogical re-derivation rather than a circular prediction. Section 4.5 obtains the acoustic metric (Eqs. 90–92) by expanding the GPE Lagrangian in density-phase variables and neglecting D^2_n0 under the explicitly stated hydrodynamic conditions ξ/λ ≪ 1 and ξ/L ≪ 1 (also flagged in §3.3: 'strictly speaking, the theorem (2.1) does not apply for BECs when seen as fluids'). The superradiance criterion (Theorem 6.1) is not assumed but derived from norm conservation of the symplectic product (Eqs. 115–117); the citation to [56] is corroborating, not load-bearing. The stationary Hawking effect (§7) uses the Bogoliubov dispersion to build the mode structure and obtains the non-unitary S-matrix from the IN/OUT transformation (Eqs. 159–162); pair production follows from that transformation rather than being inserted as an input. The notes explicitly acknowledge that the effect 'heavily relies on dispersive effects' and that the gravitational Hawking effect 'cannot be predicted in a stationary setting' (§7.1.1, §7.3.2), so this limitation is disclosed rather than hidden. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The self-citations to [34–37] are literature pointers to prior applications; the central derivations are anchored to standard external results and to the self-contained GPE/BdG framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and no fitted parameters. Its load-bearing premises are standard domain assumptions of the analogue-gravity and BEC literature, and the notes are explicit about where those assumptions fail (hydrodynamic limit, realizability of shear layers, dispersion dependence of the Hawking analogue). The four listed free parameters are hand-chosen values for numerical illustrations only.

free parameters (4)
  • downstream speed of sound c_d = 0.3 c_u (step-interface example) = 0.3 c_u
    Hand-chosen in §7.2 to realize a supersonic downstream region; used for Figs 10 and 12. Illustrative, not fitted to data, and not load-bearing for the pedagogical claim.
  • shear-layer transverse momentum k_x = 0.5 ξ⁻¹ = 0.5 ξ⁻¹
    Fixed transverse momentum used in the BdG spectrum of Fig 7 (§6.5.1); illustrative.
  • vortex flow parameters A = 3 c_s, B = 4 c_s = A = 3 c_s, B = 4 c_s
    Used for the dispersion plots of Fig 4 (§6.3); illustrative.
  • GPE evolution parameters v_x ≈ 0.75 c_u, c_d = 0.25 c_u = v_x ≈ 0.75 c_u, c_d = 0.25 c_u
    Used in the black-hole-lasing simulation of Fig 13 (§7.5.1); illustrative.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Unruh's acoustic-metric theorem: linear perturbations of an inviscid, barotropic, irrotational fluid obey a KG equation in an acoustic metric.
    Stated as Theorem 2.1 and cited to [3]. The entire sound-as-spacetime mapping rests on it; the notes themselves concede BECs are not strictly barotropic (Section 3.3), so it holds only in the hydrodynamic limit.
  • domain assumption The weakly interacting dilute-gas description: two-body contact potential with g = Ω_d ħ²a/m.
    Section 3.1. Standard BEC modeling premise required for the GPE and the Bogoliubov dispersion.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov approximation: the condensate is classicalized (field operator replaced by a complex order parameter).
    Section 3.2. Needed to obtain the GPE from the many-body Hamiltonian; the notes note the associated spontaneous breaking of the phase symmetry.
  • domain assumption The superluminal Bogoliubov dispersion supplies the counter-propagating modes in the supersonic region that make the stationary Hawking effect well defined.
    Sections 7.1.1–7.1.2. The entire SHE calculation depends on these dispersive modes, which the notes state are absent in the hydrodynamic limit where the strict spacetime analogy holds.
  • domain assumption Synthetic gauge fields can realize the non-irrotational shear-layer velocity profile as a stationary GPE solution.
    Section 6.2.2, citing [62,63]. The shear-layer superradiance analysis (including Fig 7) depends on this realizability, which the notes acknowledge is not a natural GPE solution.
  • standard math Standard QFT machinery: symplectic/Klein–Gordon product, Bogoliubov transformations, two-mode squeezing.
    Sections 4.3–5 and 6.4. Unproved background mathematics used throughout the quantization and scattering derivations.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 51332 in / 20255 out tokens · 157793 ms · 2026-08-03T16:14:00.276346+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Analogue gravity explores how collective excitations in condensed matter systems can reproduce the behavior of fields in curved spacetimes. An important example is the acoustic black holes that can occur for sound in a moving fluid. In these lecture notes, we focus on atomic Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs), quantum fluids that provide an interesting platform for analogue gravity studies thanks to their accurate theoretical description, remarkable experimental control, and ultralow temperatures that allow the quantum nature of sound to emerge. We give a pedagogical introduction to analogue black holes and the theoretical description of BECs and their elementary excitations, which behave as quantum fields in curved spacetimes. We then apply these tools to survey the current understanding of black-hole superradiance and analogue Hawking radiation, including explicit examples and numerical methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.14209 by Adri\`a Delhom, Luca Giacomelli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Streamlines of the vortex geometry. The location of the ergosurface and of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plots of the Bogoliubov dispersion relation in a homogenous condensate for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper part: velocity profile of the shear layer (light blue) and dispersion rela [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Local Klein-Gordon (upper panels) and Bogoliubov (lower panels) dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Entanglement entropy of the OUT modes produced in superradiant scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pictorial representation of superradiant instabilities. (a) and (b) show two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real and imaginary parts of the eigenfrequencies of the Bogoliubov problem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pictorial representation of the one-dimensional BEC black hole, consisting of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dispersion relation in the asymptotic regions inside (left) and outside (right) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scattering matrix elements obtained from the numerical solution of the step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Penrose diagram of the formation of a black hole, with the relevant modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Density-density correlations of the quantum emission for the step interface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Snapshots of the numerical time evolution of the GPE displaying a black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_13.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes, Communications in Mathematical Physics 43, 199 (1975), doi:10.1007/BF02345020, Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976)

    doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

  2. [2]

    W. G. Unruh,Experimental black hole evaporation, Physical Review Letters46, 1351 (1981), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.1351

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.46.1351 1981

  3. [3]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Analogue gravity, Living Reviews in Relativity 14(1), 3 (2011), doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-3

    doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-3 2011

  4. [4]

    Novello, M

    M. Novello, M. Visser and G. V olovik,Artificial black holes, World Scientific, doi:10.1142/4861 (2002). 62 SciPost Physics Lecture Notes Submission

    work page doi:10.1142/4861 2002

  5. [5]

    Faccio, F

    D. Faccio, F. Belgiorno, S. Cacciatori, V . Gorini, S. Liberati and U. Moschella, eds.,Ana- logue gravity phenomenology: analogue spacetimes and horizons, from theory to experi- ment, vol. 870, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00266-8 (2013)

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00266-8 2013

  6. [6]

    S. L. Braunstein, M. Faizal, L. M. Krauss, F. Marino and N. A. Shah,Analogue sim- ulations of quantum gravity with fluids, Nature Reviews Physics5(10), 612 (2023), doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00630-y

    doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00630-y 2023

  7. [7]

    C. R. Almeida and M. J. Jacquet,Analogue gravity and the hawking effect: historical perspective and literature review, The European Physical Journal H48(1), 15 (2023), doi:10.1140/epjh/s13129-023-00063-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjh/s13129-023-00063-2 2023

  8. [8]

    Schützhold,Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics p

    R. Schützhold,Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics p. 104198 (2025), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104198

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    relativistic

    N. B. Kopnin and G. E. V olovik,Critical velocity and event horizon in pair-correlated sys- tems with “relativistic” fermionic quasiparticles, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters67(2), 140 (1998), doi:10.1134/1.567637

    work page doi:10.1134/1.567637 1998

  10. [10]

    T. G. Philbin, C. Kuklewicz, S. Robertson, S. Hill, F. Konig and U. Leon- hardt,Fiber-optical analog of the event horizon, Science319(5868), 1367 (2008), doi:10.1126/science.1153625

    doi:10.1126/science.1153625 2008

  11. [11]

    Belgiorno, S

    F. Belgiorno, S. L. Cacciatori, M. Clerici, V . Gorini, G. Ortenzi, L. Rizzi, E. Rubino, V . G. Sala and D. Faccio,Hawking radiation from ultrashort laser pulse filaments, Physical Review Letters105(20), 203901 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.203901

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.203901 2010

  12. [12]

    Schützhold and W

    R. Schützhold and W. G. Unruh,Gravity wave analogues of black holes, Physical Review D66(4), 044019 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.044019

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.044019 2002

  13. [13]

    Rousseaux, C

    G. Rousseaux, C. Mathis, P. Maïssa, T. G. Philbin and U. Leonhardt,Observation of negative-frequency waves in a water tank: a classical analogue to the hawking effect?, New Journal of Physics10(5), 053015 (2008), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/5/053015

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/5/053015 2008

  14. [14]

    Weinfurtner, E

    S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh and G. A. Lawrence,Mea- surement of stimulated hawking emission in an analogue system, Physical Review Letters 106(2), 021302 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.021302

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.021302 2011

  15. [15]

    photon fluid

    F. Marino,Acoustic black holes in a two-dimensional “photon fluid”, Physical Review A 78(6), 063804 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.063804

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.063804 2008

  16. [16]

    H. S. Nguyen, D. Gerace, I. Carusotto, D. Sanvitto, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch and A. Amo,Acoustic black hole in a stationary hydrody- namic flow of microcavity polaritons, Physical Review Letters114(3), 036402 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.036402

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.036402 2015

  17. [17]

    P. D. Nation, M. P. Blencowe, A. J. Rimberg and E. Buks,Analogue hawking radiation in a dc-squid array transmission line, Physical Review Letters103(8), 087004 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.087004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.087004 2009

  18. [18]

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller,Sonic black holes in dilute bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review A63(2), 023611 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.63.023611

    doi:10.1103/physreva.63.023611 2001

  19. [19]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Analogue gravity from bose-einstein condensates, Classical and Quantum Gravity18(6), 1137 (2001), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/307. 63 SciPost Physics Lecture Notes Submission

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/307 2001

  20. [20]

    Leonhardt, T

    U. Leonhardt, T. Kiss and P. Öhberg,Theory of elementary excitations in unstable bose- einstein condensates and the instability of sonic horizons, Physical Review A67(3), 033602 (2003), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.033602

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.67.033602 2003

  21. [21]

    Macher and R

    J. Macher and R. Parentani,Black/white hole radiation from dispersive theories, Physical Review D79, 124008 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.124008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.124008 2009

  22. [22]

    Balbinot, A

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati and I. Carusotto,Nonlocal density corre- lations as a signature of hawking radiation from acoustic black holes, Physical Review A 78(2), 021603 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.021603

    doi:10.1103/physreva.78.021603 2008

  23. [23]

    Carusotto, S

    I. Carusotto, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati, R. Balbinot and A. Fabbri,Numerical observation of hawking radiation from acoustic black holes in atomic bose–einstein condensates, New Journal of Physics10(10), 103001 (2008), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103001

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103001 2008

  24. [24]

    Recati, N

    A. Recati, N. Pavloff and I. Carusotto,Bogoliubov theory of acoustic hawking radiation in bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review A80(4), 043603 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.043603

    doi:10.1103/physreva.80.043603 2009

  25. [25]

    Larré, A

    P.-É. Larré, A. Recati, I. Carusotto and N. Pavloff,Quantum fluctuations around black hole horizons in bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review A85(1), 013621 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.013621

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.013621 2012

  26. [26]

    Lahav, A

    O. Lahav, A. Itah, A. Blumkin, C. Gordon, S. Rinott, A. Zayats and J. Steinhauer,Realiza- tion of a sonic black hole analog in a bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review Letters 105(24), 240401 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.240401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.240401 2010

  27. [27]

    Steinhauer,Observation of self-amplifying hawking radiation in an analogue black-hole laser, Nature Physics10(11), 864 (2014), doi:10.1038/nphys3104

    J. Steinhauer,Observation of self-amplifying hawking radiation in an analogue black-hole laser, Nature Physics10(11), 864 (2014), doi:10.1038/nphys3104

    doi:10.1038/nphys3104 2014

  28. [28]

    Steinhauer,Observation of quantum hawking radiation and its entanglement in an ana- logue black hole, Nature Physics12(10), 959 (2016), doi:10.1038/nphys3863

    J. Steinhauer,Observation of quantum hawking radiation and its entanglement in an ana- logue black hole, Nature Physics12(10), 959 (2016), doi:10.1038/nphys3863

    doi:10.1038/nphys3863 2016

  29. [29]

    J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V . I. Kolobov and J. Steinhauer,Observation of thermal hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Nature569(7758), 688 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1153-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1153-8 2019

  30. [30]

    V . I. Kolobov, K. Golubkov, J. R. Muñoz de Nova and J. Steinhauer,Observation of sta- tionary spontaneous hawking radiation and the time evolution of an analogue black hole, Nature Physics17(3), 362 (2021), doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01162-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01162-7 2021

  31. [31]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson and I. B. Spielman,A rapidly expanding bose-einstein condensate: an expanding universe in the lab, Physical Review X8(2), 021021 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021021

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021021 2018

  32. [32]

    Viermann, M

    C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, A. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, N. Sánchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, H. Strobelet al.,Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime, Nature611(7935), 260 (2022), doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00189-y

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00189-y 2022

  33. [33]

    Prain, S

    A. Prain, S. Fagnocchi and S. Liberati,Analogue cosmological particle creation: Quantum correlations in expanding bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review D82(10), 105018 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.105018

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.105018 2010

  34. [34]

    Giacomelli and I

    L. Giacomelli and I. Carusotto,Ergoregion instabilities in rotating two-dimensional bose- einstein condensates: Perspectives on the stability of quantized vortices, Physical Review Research2(3), 033139 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033139, 1905.02447. 64 SciPost Physics Lecture Notes Submission

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Giacomelli,Superradiant phenomena: Lessons from and for Bose-Einstein condensates, Ph.D

    L. Giacomelli,Superradiant phenomena: Lessons from and for Bose-Einstein condensates, Ph.D. thesis, Università degli studi di Trento, doi:10.15168/11572_294551 (2021)

    work page doi:10.15168/11572_294551 2021

  36. [36]

    Giacomelli and I

    L. Giacomelli and I. Carusotto,Understanding superradiant phenomena with synthetic vector potentials in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review A103(4), 043309 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.043309

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.043309 2021

  37. [37]

    Giacomelli and I

    L. Giacomelli and I. Carusotto,Spontaneous quantum superradiant emission in atomic bose-einstein condensates subject to a synthetic vector potential, Physical Review A104(1), 013313 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.013313

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.013313 2021

  38. [38]

    Gooding, S

    C. Gooding, S. Biermann, S. Erne, J. Louko, W. G. Unruh, J. Schmiedmayer and S. We- infurtner,Interferometric unruh detectors for bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review Letters125(21), 213603 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.213603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.213603 2020

  39. [39]

    Barceló,Lorentzian Space-Times from Parabolic and Elliptic Systems of PDEs, Fundam

    C. Barceló,Lorentzian Space-Times from Parabolic and Elliptic Systems of PDEs, Fundam. Theor. Phys.153, 261 (2007), doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6318-3_14

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6318-3_14 2007

  40. [40]

    R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermody- namics, Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, ISBN 978-0-226-87027-4 (1995)

    1995

  41. [41]

    Visser and S

    M. Visser and S. E. C. Weinfurtner,Vortex geometry for the equatorial slice of the Kerr black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 2493 (2005), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/12/011, gr-qc/ 0409014

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/12/011 2005

  42. [42]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein condensation and superfluidity, vol. 164, Ox- ford University Press (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith,Bose–Einstein condensation in dilute gases, Cambridge uni- versity press (2008)

    2008

  44. [44]

    Castin,Bose–Einstein condensates in atomic gases: simple theoretical results, InCo- herent atomic matter waves, pp

    Y . Castin,Bose–Einstein condensates in atomic gases: simple theoretical results, InCo- herent atomic matter waves, pp. 1–136. Springer (2001)

    2001

  45. [45]

    P. A. M. Dirac,Lectures on quantum mechanics, New York

  46. [46]

    Bogoliubov,On the theory of superfluidity, J

    N. Bogoliubov,On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys11(1), 23 (1947), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.884

    doi:10.1103/physrev.75.884 1947

  47. [47]

    Margoni and D

    E. Margoni and D. Oriti,The emergence of spacetime: what role for functionalism?(2024), 2404.11386

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Lafrance and R

    R. Lafrance and R. C. Myers,Gravity’s rainbow, Physical Review D51, 2584 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2584, hep-th/9411018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  49. [49]

    Magueijo and L

    J. Magueijo and L. Smolin,Gravity’s rainbow, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 1725 (2004), doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/7/001, gr-qc/0305055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    Castin and R

    Y . Castin and R. Dum,Low-temperature Bose-Einstein condensates in time-dependent traps: Beyond the U (1) symmetry-breaking approach, Physical Review A57(4), 3008 (1998), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3008

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.57.3008 1998

  51. [51]

    S. A. Fulling,Aspects of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, vol. 17, Cambridge university press (1989). 65 SciPost Physics Lecture Notes Submission

    1989

  52. [52]

    Barcelo, L

    C. Barcelo, L. J. Garay and G. Jannes,The two faces of quantum sound, Physical Review D82, 044042 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044042, 1006.0181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    C. P. Burgess,Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 329 (2007), doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140508, hep-th/0701053

    arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V . Cardoso and P. Pani,Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Springer International Publishing, ISBN 9783030466220, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46622-0 (2020)

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46622-0 2020

  55. [55]

    Richartz, S

    M. Richartz, S. Weinfurtner, A. J. Penner and W. G. Unruh,Generalized superradiant scattering, Physical Review D80(12) (2009), doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.124016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.124016 2009

  56. [56]

    Delhom, K

    A. Delhom, K. Guerrero, P. Calizaya Cabrera, K. Falque, A. Bramati, A. J. Brady, M. J. Jacquet and I. Agullo,Entanglement from superradiance and rotating quantum fluids of light, Physical Review D109(10), 105024 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.105024, 2310.16031

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford and S. Weinfurtner,Ro- tational superradiant scattering in a vortex flow, Nature Physics13, 833 (2017), doi:10.1038/nphys4151

    doi:10.1038/nphys4151 2017

  58. [58]

    Braidotti, R

    M.-C. Braidotti, R. Prizia, C. Maitland, F. Marino, A. Prain, I. Starshynov, N. Westerberg, E. M. Wright and D. Faccio,Measurement of Penrose Superradiance in a Photon Super- fluid, Physical Review Letters128, 013901 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.013901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.013901 2022

  59. [59]

    Patrick,Rotational superradiance with bogoliubov dispersion, Classical and Quantum Gravity38(9), 095010 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abf1fc

    S. Patrick,Rotational superradiance with bogoliubov dispersion, Classical and Quantum Gravity38(9), 095010 (2021), doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abf1fc

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abf1fc 2021

  60. [60]

    Agullo and A

    I. Agullo and A. J. Brady (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Schiff, H

    L. Schiff, H. Snyder and J. Weinberg,On the existence of stationary states of the mesotron field, Physical Review57(4), 315 (1940), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.315

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.57.315 1940

  62. [62]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli ¯unas and P. Öhberg,Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics83(4), 1523 (2011), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1523 2011

  63. [63]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli ¯unas, P. Öhberg and I. B. Spielman,Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics77(12), 126401 (2014), doi:10.1088/0034- 4885/77/12/126401

    doi:10.1088/0034- 2014

  64. [64]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, M. Richartz and S. Weinfurtner,Quasinormal mode oscillations in an analogue black hole experiment, Physical Review Letters125(1), 011301 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.011301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.011301 2020

  65. [65]

    Patrick, H

    S. Patrick, H. Goodhew, C. Gooding and S. Weinfurtner,Backreaction in an analogue black hole experiment, Physical Review Letters126(4), 041105 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041105

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.041105 2021

  66. [66]

    Guerrero, K

    K. Guerrero, K. Falque, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati and M. J. Jacquet,Multiply quantized vortex spectroscopy in a quantum fluid of light(2025), doi:10.1103/whgn-6889, 2507. 14539

    work page doi:10.1103/whgn-6889 2025

  67. [67]

    Delhom, A

    A. Delhom, A. Jiménez-Cano and F. J. Maldonado Torralba,Instabilities in Field The- ory: A Primer with Applications in Modified Gravity, SpringerBriefs in Physics. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-40433-7 (2022), 2207.13431. 66 SciPost Physics Lecture Notes Submission

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Giacomelli and I

    L. Giacomelli and I. Carusotto,Interplay of Kelvin-Helmholtz and superradiant instabilities of an array of quantized vortices in a two-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate, SciPost Phys.14, 025 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.2.025

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.14.2.025 2023

  69. [69]

    Fornberg,Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids, Mathe- matics of computation51(184), 699 (1988), doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0935077-0

    B. Fornberg,Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids, Mathe- matics of computation51(184), 699 (1988), doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0935077-0

    doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1988-0935077-0 1988

  70. [70]

    S. J. Robertson,The theory of hawking radiation in laboratory analogues, Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics45(16), 163001 (2012), doi:10.1088/0953-4075/45/16/163001

    doi:10.1088/0953-4075/45/16/163001 2012

  71. [71]

    C. R. Almeida and M. J. Jacquet,Analogue gravity and the Hawking effect: historical per- spective and literature review, Eur. Phys. J. H48(1), 15 (2023), doi:10.1140/epjh/s13129- 023-00063-2, 2212.08838

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Macher and R

    J. Macher and R. Parentani,Black hole radiation in Bose-Einstein condensates, Physical Review A80, 043601 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.043601, 0905.3634

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    Dalfovo, A

    F. Dalfovo, A. Fracchetti, A. Lastri, L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Quantum evaporation from the free surface of superfluid4he, Journal of low temperature physics104(5), 367 (1996), doi:10.1007/BF00751863

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00751863 1996

  74. [74]

    L. C. Barbado, C. Barcelo, L. J. Garay and G. Jannes,The Trans-Planckian problem as a guiding principle, JHEP11, 112 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)112, 1109.3593

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    R. M. Wald,On Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.45, 9 (1975), doi:10.1007/BF01609863

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01609863 1975

  76. [76]

    Barcelo, L

    C. Barcelo, L. J. Garay and G. Jannes,Sensitivity of Hawking radiation to superluminal dispersion relations, Physical Review D79, 024016 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.024016, 0807.4147

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [77]

    L.-P. Euvé, S. Robertson, N. James, A. Fabbri and G. Rousseaux,Scattering of co-current surface waves on an analogue black hole, Physical Review Lett.124(14), 141101 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.141101, 1806.05539

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Falque, A

    K. Falque, A. Delhom, Q. Glorieux, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati and M. J. Jacquet,Polariton fluids as quantum field theory simulators on tailored curved spacetimes, Physical Review Letters135(2), 023401 (2025), doi:10.1103/t5dh-rx6w, 2311.01392

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Isoard and N

    M. Isoard and N. Pavloff,Departing from thermality of analogue hawking radia- tion in a bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review Letters124(6), 060401 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.060401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.060401 2020

  80. [80]

    Isoard, N

    M. Isoard, N. Milazzo, N. Pavloff and O. Giraud,Bipartite and tripartite entangle- ment in a bose-einstein acoustic black hole, Physical Review A104(6), 063302 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.063302

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.104.063302 2021

Showing first 80 references.