Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Revealing electron-ytterbium interactions through Rydberg molecular spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules of ytterbium provide the first spectroscopic measurement of low-energy electron–ytterbium scattering, yielding a zero-energy scattering length of -7.5 a0 and two p-wave shape resonances, and supporting the

desk verdict First Yb ULRM spectroscopy that nails the s-wave scattering length and p1/2 resonance position; the p3/2 position in the abstract is overclaimed. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.20609 v2 pith:TNHFZEEG submitted 2025-12-23 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Tangi Legrand , Xin Wang , Milena Simić , Florian Pausewang , Wolfgang Alt , Eduardo Uruñuela , Matthew T. Eiles , Sebastian Hofferberth This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 34.80.Bm32.80.Ee
keywords ultralong-rangeRydbergmoleculesytterbiumelectron-atomscatteringshaperesonancelengthquantumdefectCoulombGreen'sfunctiondivalentatoms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that ultralong-range Rydberg molecules (ULRMs) of 174Yb offer a precise, experimentally accessible window into how slow electrons scatter off neutral ytterbium atoms. From high-resolution vibrational spectra of 6sns 1S0 states spanning n=26 to 45, and using Coulomb Green's function theory with an 8-parameter model potential, the authors extract the zero-energy s-wave scattering length a_s(0)=-7.5 a0, locate p1/2 and p3/2 shape resonances at 24.4 meV and 56.7 meV, and conclude that Yb- exists only as a metastable resonance rather than a bound negative ion. The same analysis yields a refined quantum defect for the 6s23f 1F3 state (nu=21.73253(4)). A sympathetic reader would care because this provides the missing low-energy electron–Yb scattering data needed to model ultracold ytterbium gases, Rydberg interactions, and the chemistry of lanthanide anions.

What carries the argument

The method unites a Fermi–Omont pseudopotential — which encodes the electron-atom interaction through energy-dependent scattering lengths and volumes — with the Coulomb Green's function formalism, which builds the full Born-Oppenheimer potential curves without truncating the Rydberg basis. The unknown interaction is represented by an eight-parameter model potential V_La(r) with screened Coulomb and polarization terms; its radial Schrödinger equation is solved (with a spin-orbit term) to produce the phase shifts that feed the pseudopotential. Vibrational levels are then obtained by solving the nuclear Schrödinger equation in the resulting potential curves using Siegert pseudostates, which cor

What would settle it

A direct independent measurement of the p3/2 resonance position, either by fitting the deep-well vibrational states that the paper leaves unassigned or by electron transmission/scattering measurements on Yb vapor in the 20–80 meV range, would settle the model's central claim; a resonance clearly inconsistent with 56.7 meV would falsify the extracted phase shifts. Alternatively, detection of a bound Yb- anion with electron affinity above 3 meV would directly contradict the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's terms, is that the vibrational spectrum of ytterbium ULRMs is a quantitative map of electron–ytterbium scattering: the binding energies of the molecular levels are controlled by the energy-dependent s- and p-wave phase shifts of the Rydberg electron off the ground-state atom. The authors show that a single 8-parameter model potential, combined with the Coulomb Green's function formalism for the molecular potentials, reproduces the measured spectra (most levels within 10% in binding energy) across the investigated range n=26 to 45 and over three orders of magnitude in binding energy. The fitted phase shifts give a_s(0)=-7.5 a0, p1/2 and p3/2 shape

Load-bearing premise

The extracted scattering physics rests on the assumption that the true electron–ytterbium interaction is faithfully described by the eight-parameter model potential family of Eq. (5); if that functional form is wrong, every extracted quantity — including the headline scattering length — shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Yb ULRMs become a calibrated probe of electron–Yb interactions, extendable to other divalent atoms (Sr, Hg) where photodetachment of a bound anion is impossible.
  • The small negative scattering length (-7.5 a0) means the transition from few- to many-body Rydberg physics (polyatomic molecules, polarons) occurs at lower n in Yb than in alkali gases.
  • The measured p-wave shape-resonance positions give theorists concrete targets for electron scattering and negative-ion calculations in lanthanides.
  • The demonstrated sensitivity to a dipole-forbidden 1F3 series shows that ULRM spectroscopy can refine quantum defects for states inaccessible by direct optical excitation.
  • The conclusion that Yb- is not bound reconciles the storage-ring upper limit (electron affinity <3 meV) with the absence of a stable anion, and predicts no threshold photodetachment signal for Yb-.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The p3/2 resonance position (56.7 meV) is inherited from the fine-structure prior E3/2=E1/2+60 meV rather than measured directly, so the paper's own data mainly constrain the s1/2 and p1/2 channels; fitting the unassigned deep-well states would convert the p3/2 inference into a measurement.
  • A complementary treatment with a different potential family (e.g., R-matrix or ab initio scattering calculations) would test whether the 10% agreement level conceals systematic shifts in a_s(0) beyond the quoted few-percent uncertainty.
  • If a_s(0)=-7.5 a0 is correct, Rydberg polarons in dense 174Yb BECs should exhibit a measurable density-dependent spectral shift, providing an independent, many-body check of the scattering length.
  • The near-degeneracy between 1S0 and 1F3 at n=26 suggests two-photon excitation could create 1F3 molecules with a tiny S-state admixture, opening a route to explore singlet-triplet mixing in the molecular spectrum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first ultralong-range Rydberg molecule (ULRM) spectroscopy of 174Yb in the 6sns 1S0 Rydberg series, for n=26–27 and 30–45. Dimer and polyatomic spectral lines are identified by density scaling and additive binding-energy relations, and the molecular potentials are computed with a Coulomb Green's-function method combined with a two-electron LS-coupling treatment. The electron–Yb scattering phase shifts are obtained from an 8-parameter model potential [Eq. (5)] fitted to weakly bound states at n=31 and n=36 and then cross-validated against spectra over the full n range. The authors quote a zero-energy s-wave scattering length a_s(0)=-7.5 a0, p1/2 and p3/2 shape resonances at 24.4 and 56.7 meV, a polarizability alpha=141.20(5), and a refined 1F3 quantum defect nu_1F3=21.73253(4). They conclude that Yb- exists only as a metastable resonance. The experimental work is careful and the out-of-sample comparison over many Rydberg states is a strong feature; however, the p3/2 resonance position is not directly constrained by the fitted data, and the precision claims for the extracted quantities are not supported by a documented uncertainty analysis.

Significance. If the central scattering results hold, this is a substantial advance: it provides the first direct experimental access to low-energy electron–Yb scattering, demonstrates ULRM spectroscopy in a divalent atom beyond strontium, and gives quantitative support for the absence of a stable Yb- anion. The use of the Coulomb Green's-function formalism with spin recoupling, the two-photon excitation scheme with low Rabi rates, and the density-scaling identification of dimers are all methodologically sound. The cross-validation against roughly fifteen independently measured Rydberg states after fitting only n=31 and n=36 is a genuine strength, and the data are made available in a repository. The paper also identifies a concrete falsifiable target—spectroscopy of the inner p3/2 butterfly states—that would test the underconstrained channel. The significance is moderated, however, by the model-dependent nature of the phase-shift extraction and by the absence of rigorous uncertainties; the abstract's presentation of two measured p-wave resonance positions goes beyond what the data support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. IV.D; Appendix D] The abstract and Sec. IV.D state that the work extracts 'the positions of two spin-orbit split p-wave shape resonances' and quote 56.7 meV for p3/2. This overstates what is actually constrained. Appendix D fixes E3/2 = E1/2 + 60 meV using the fine-structure interval from Ref. [77] as an initial condition, and the unassigned gray states attributed to p3/2 butterfly wells are explicitly excluded from the fit (Sec. IV.C). Sec. IV.D acknowledges that different parameter sets can reproduce the same s1/2 and p1/2 phase shifts while differing in the p3/2 channel, and the Conclusion assigns the p3/2 resonance only 'with significant uncertainty, a few tens of meV away' from p1/2. The 56.7 meV value is therefore a prior-seeded model prediction, not a directly measured resonance position. Please revise the abstract and all summary statements to separate the well-constrained s1/2 and p1/2 results fr
  2. [Sec. IV.D; Appendix D; Fig. 6] The paper reports high precision for several extracted quantities—'a few percent uncertainty' for a_s(0), 'meV level' accuracy for the p1/2 resonance, and alpha=141.20(5)—but no uncertainty propagation or covariance analysis is presented. The fit uses eight parameters in Eq. (5); Appendix D lists a single optimized parameter set with no error bars, and Fig. 6 shows phase shifts without uncertainty bands. It is unclear whether the parenthetical uncertainty on alpha and the claimed uncertainties on the scattering parameters come from the experimental line positions, from parameter covariance, or from a sensitivity estimate. Please add a formal covariance/sensitivity analysis, or explicitly label the quoted values as point estimates without formal uncertainties. This documentation is needed to support the precision claims and to make the results comparable with future measurements or calcul
  3. [Sec. IV.A; Eq. (5); Sec. IV.D; Fig. 5] The extracted phase shifts are outputs of an assumed model-potential family, not directly observed quantities, and the model misses three observed threshold states (n=31, 33, 36). These misses are acknowledged, but they are a reminder that the central results—a_s(0) and the p1/2 resonance—may carry systematic errors from the choice of short-range potential that are not bounded by the excellent agreement for the other states. I request a sensitivity analysis with a different plausible short-range potential or an explicit statement that the quoted scattering length and resonance position are model-dependent at a stated level. Without this, the internal consistency of the fit is convincing, but the claimed transferability of the extracted e-Yb interaction remains an assumption rather than a demonstrated property.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The p-wave term in Eq. (3) contains corrupted placeholder symbols ('← /leftr⫯g⊸tl⫯ne...'); the equation should be typeset properly.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'nearly two decades in principal quantum number n' is misleading: n ranges from 26 to 45, less than a factor of two. If 'decade' is intended in the logarithmic sense, please rephrase; otherwise the claimed range should refer to the binding energy, which does span three orders of magnitude.
  3. [Sec. IV.D] The sentence 'The Ramsauer-Townsend zero predicted from our fit results lies at 56 meV' appears immediately after the p3/2 resonance at 56.7 meV. Please clarify whether this is a numerical coincidence or a related feature of the same model, since it may confuse readers.
  4. [References] References [9] and [21] are duplicates of the same Daley et al. paper; one should be removed.
  5. [Fig. 5; Appendix B] Given the density of the color-coded state classification, a table listing the experimental and computed binding energies for each n and each assigned state label would substantially improve reproducibility and would make the out-of-sample comparison easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core results are obtained by fitting a model potential to measured ULRM spectra and validating across many n; the p3/2 caveat is underdetermination, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a standard parameter-extraction problem: measured ULRM binding energies are fit with an eight-parameter model potential (Eq. 5), the resulting phase shifts are inserted into the Coulomb Green's function formalism, and the calculated vibrational spectra are compared against data over n=26-45. The agreement is not equivalent to the fit by construction: eight parameters are strongly constrained by many independently assigned vibrational levels with different n-scalings, including the model-independent A0 nu^-6 trend and the p1/2 butterfly-well series. The p3/2 resonance position at 56.7 meV is the only quantity that deserves caution. Appendix D seeds the initial effective-range model with the external prior E3/2 = E1/2 + 60 meV from Ref. [77], and Sec. IV.D itself states: "different parameter sets may reproduce nearly the same s1/2 and p1/2 phase shifts while differing in the p3/2 channel," while the gray p3/2 candidate states were excluded from the direct fit. This makes the abstract's phrase "positions of two spin-orbit split p-wave shape resonances" too strong for the p3/2 channel. However, this is a model-extrapolation and underdetermination issue, not circularity: the final 56.7 meV is not identical to the 60 meV prior (the reported fine-structure splitting is 30 meV), the p3/2 phase shift is computed from the same spin-orbit-coupled model potential rather than directly fitted as a free parameter, and the Conclusion explicitly qualifies the p3/2 position as lying "with significant uncertainty, a few tens of meV away" from p1/2. Self-citations to Eiles and collaborators (Refs. [46,86,88,90,92,105]) are methodological references, not load-bearing uniqueness theorems or unverified ansatze, and the Green's function treatment is cross-checked against the diagonalization method. Thus no step in the claimed derivation reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central outputs are parameters of an 8-parameter phenomenological e-Yb potential (Eq. 5) fitted to molecular spectra; the phase shifts, scattering length, resonance positions, and polarizability are all fit outputs, with the p3/2 channel additionally inheriting a 60 meV prior from Ref. [77]. A 1F3 quantum defect is fitted to the single n=26 spectrum. No new physical entities are postulated; the shape resonances are standard scattering features. The main axioms are the standard ULRM framework (Fermi pseudopotential, Born-Oppenheimer, single-channel LS coupling).

free parameters (6)
  • polarizability alpha = 141.203846 (quoted as alpha = 141.20(5))
    One of the 8 model-potential parameters (Eq. 5) fitted to n=31/36 spectra; agreement with Ref. [102] is quoted as validation, but the +/- 0.05 uncertainty is not propagated from a systematic analysis.
  • s-wave short-range parameters A_S, gamma_S, r_c^S = A_S = 13.045043, gamma_S = 25.476948, r_c^S = 3.755942
    Fit parameters of V_La(r) (Eq. 5) that effectively set the s-wave scattering length; jointly yield a_s(0) = -7.5 a0.
  • p-wave short-range parameters A_P, gamma_P, r_c^P = A_P = 28.394921, gamma_P = 25.505122, r_c^P = 2.296864
    Fit parameters controlling the p1/2 and p3/2 phase shifts; the p3/2 output is only weakly constrained by data (gray peaks not fitted).
  • screening parameter lambda = 5.25602
    Eighth fit parameter in Eq. 5.
  • initial effective-range parameters a_s(0), alpha, R_e, E_1/2, Gamma_1/2 = intermediate (seed fit)
    Five-parameter seed fit (App. D) later replaced by the model potential; E_3/2 was fixed to E_1/2 + 60 meV from Ref. [77], which is the main prior constraining the 56.7 meV p3/2 result.
  • 1F3 quantum defect nu_1F3 = 21.73253(4)
    Fit to the n=26 spectrum; sensitivity is to the relative 1F3-1S0 defect, so the value inherits the assumed 1S0 energy.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Fermi-Omont pseudopotential truncated at L_a = 1 (Eq. 3): the e-Yb interaction is captured by s- and p-wave energy-dependent phase shifts only.
    Standard in ULRM theory, justified by the Wigner threshold law and prior work [67]; higher partial waves are neglected in computing all molecular potentials.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation of electronic and vibrational motion, with non-adiabatic couplings neglected (Eq. G1, App. G).
    The authors estimate non-adiabatic effects at a few percent of binding energy via Ref. [92]; this enters the claimed 10% agreement.
  • domain assumption Single-channel, LS-coupled description of the 6sns 1S0 Rydberg state with sub-percent admixtures from other channels (Eq. 4, Sec. II.C).
    Justified by the near-energy-independent 1S0 quantum defect and the 3-6% mixing of other series; the n=26 case where 1F3 crosses requires ad hoc defect adjustment.
  • domain assumption Three-body reduction Yb+ + e- + Yb: the second valence (core) electron does not interact with the perturber (Sec. II.A).
    Valid for Rydberg states well below doubly excited thresholds; asserted to hold at the sub-percent level.
  • standard math Local momentum relation k = sqrt(2E + 2/R) for the scattering electron (Sec. II.A).
    Standard pseudopotential-framework assumption used to make the phase shifts energy-dependent along the potential curves.
  • standard math Effective-range expansion of the scattering length for a polarization potential (Eq. D1) and Breit-Wigner form for resonant p-wave phase shifts (Eq. D2).
    Used only to seed initial fit parameters; final results come from integrating the Schrodinger equation with Eq. 6.
  • domain assumption Dirac-equation inner boundary condition resolves the r^-3 spin-orbit singularity (App. C, following Ref. [97]).
    The phase shifts, especially p-wave, depend on this short-range treatment; the paper follows Bahrim et al. without independent validation for Yb.
  • domain assumption Polyatomic binding energies equal integer sums of dimer binding energies (Sec. III, App. B).
    Supported by Refs. [42,95,96] for additive S-state potentials; used to separate dimer lines from polyatomic backgrounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revealing electron-ytterbium interactions through Rydberg molecular spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TNHFZEEG

@misc{pith2026251220609,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revealing electron-ytterbium interactions through Rydberg molecular spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TNHFZEEG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.20609}
}
abstract

Divalent atoms have emerged as powerful alternatives to alkalis in ultracold atom platforms, offering unique advantages arising from their two-electron structure. Among these species, ytterbium (Yb) is especially promising, yet its anionic properties and its Rydberg spectrum remain comparatively unexplored. In this work, we perform a first and comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigation of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules (ULRMs) of $^{174}$Yb in $6sns\,^1S_0$ Rydberg states across nearly two decades in principal quantum number $n$ and three orders of magnitude in molecular binding energy. Using the Coulomb Green's function formalism, we compute Born-Oppenheimer molecular potentials describing the Rydberg atom in the presence of a ground-state perturber and achieve quantitative agreement with high-resolution molecular spectra. This enables the extraction of low-energy electron-Yb scattering phase shifts, including the zero-energy $s$-wave scattering length and the positions of two spin-orbit split $p$-wave shape resonances. Our results provide strong evidence that the Yb$^{-}$ anion exists only as a metastable resonance.% We additionally show the sensitivity of ULRM spectra to the atomic quantum defects, using this to determine the quantum defect of the $6s23f\, ^1F_3$ state. Together, these findings establish Yb ULRMs as a powerful probe of electron-Yb interactions and lay essential groundwork for future Rydberg experiments with divalent atoms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.20609 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic drawing of an ultralong-range Ryd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Overall PEC landscape between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spectra near the atomic 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated PEC (black) and vibrational wave functions near the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Measured and calculated molecular binding energies for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Energy-dependent phase shifts for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Lu-Fano-type plot showing the fractional part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Observation of $\Pi$-symmetry ultralong-range Rydberg molecules

    physics.atom-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First observation of Π-symmetry ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, identified via Zeeman-like multiplet structure and an approximately (n-μ)^{-11} binding-energy scaling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [77]

    V. A. Dzuba and G. F. Gribakin, Yb − 6p1/2 low-lying shape resonance rather than a bound state, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics31, L483 (1998)

    1998

  2. [1]

    C. S. Adams, J. D. Pritchard, and J. P. Shaffer, Ryd- berg atom quantum technologies, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 012002 (2019)

    2019

  3. [2]

    F. B. Dunning, T. C. Killian, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Recent advances in Rydberg physics us- ing alkaline-earth atoms, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics49, 112003 (2016)

    2016

  4. [3]

    Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla and S

    E. Ibarra-Garc ´ ıa-Padilla and S. Choudhury, Many-body physics of ultracold alkaline-earth atoms with SU(N)- symmetric interactions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 083003 (2024). 15

    2024

  5. [4]

    Katori, Optical lattice clocks and quantum metrol- ogy, Nature Photonics5, 203 (2011)

    H. Katori, Optical lattice clocks and quantum metrol- ogy, Nature Photonics5, 203 (2011)

    2011

  6. [5]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  7. [6]

    Hinkley, J

    N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Pizzocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An Atomic Clock with 10 −18 Instability, Science341, 1215 (2013)

    2013

  8. [7]

    B. J. Bloom, T. L. Nicholson, J. R. Williams, S. L. Campbell, M. Bishof, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, S. L. Brom- ley, and J. Ye, An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10−18 level, Nature506, 71 (2014)

    2014

Show all 116 references
  1. [8]

    I. S. Madjarov, A. Cooper, A. L. Shaw, J. P. Covey, V. Schkolnik, T. H. Yoon, J. R. Williams, and M. En- dres, An Atomic-Array Optical Clock with Single-Atom Readout, Physical Review X9, 041052 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 857 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    A. P. Burgers, S. Ma, S. Saskin, J. Wilson, M. A. Alarc´ on, C. H. Greene, and J. D. Thompson, Control- ling Rydberg Excitations Using Ion-Core Transitions in Alkaline-Earth Atom-Tweezer Arrays, PRX Quantum 3, 020326 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Z. Jia, W. Huie, L. Li, W. K. C. Sun, X. Hu, Aakash, H. Kogan, A. Karve, J. Y. Lee, and J. P. Covey, An ar- chitecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium- 171 atoms, npj Quantum Information10, 106 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    K.-L. Pham, T. F. Gallagher, P. Pillet, S. Lepoutre, and P. Cheinet, Coherent Light Shift on Alkaline-Earth Rydberg Atoms from Isolated Core Excitation without Autoionization, PRX Quantum3, 020327 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Wirth, C

    M. Wirth, C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, and F. Meinert, Quadrupole Coupling of Circular Ryd- berg Qubits to Inner Shell Excitations, Physical Review Letters133, 123403 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-Lived Circular Rydberg Qubits of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Physical Review X14, 021024 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Bouillon, E

    A. Bouillon, E. Marin-Bujedo, and M. G´ en´ evriez, Direct Laser Cooling of Rydberg Atoms with an Isolated-Core Transition, Physical Review Letters132, 193402 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    S. N. Pisharody and R. R. Jones, Probing Two-Electron Dynamics of an Atom, Science303, 813 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    Millen, G

    J. Millen, G. Lochead, G. R. Corbett, R. M. Potvliege, and M. P. A. Jones, Spectroscopy of a cold strontium Rydberg gas, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 184001 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Lochead, D

    G. Lochead, D. Boddy, D. P. Sadler, C. S. Adams, and M. P. A. Jones, Number-resolved imaging of excited- state atoms using a scanning autoionization microscope, Physical Review A87, 053409 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Hummel, S

    F. Hummel, S. Weber, J. M¨ ogerle, H. Menke, J. King, B. Bloom, S. Hofferberth, and M. Li, Engineer- ing Rydberg-pair interactions in divalent atoms with hyperfine-split ionization thresholds, Physical Review A 110, 042821 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    A. J. Daley, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, and P. Zoller, Quantum Computing with Alkaline-Earth-Metal Atoms, Physical Review Letters101, 170504 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Pagano, F

    G. Pagano, F. Scazza, and M. Foss-Feig, Fast and scal- able quantum information processing with two-electron atoms in optical tweezer arrays, Advanced Quantum Technologies2, 1800067 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Pagano, S

    A. Pagano, S. Weber, D. Jaschke, T. Pfau, F. Mein- ert, S. Montangero, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Error budgeting for a controlled-phase gate with strontium-88 Rydberg atoms, Physical Review Research4, 033019 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Aymar, C

    M. Aymar, C. H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig, Multi- channel Rydberg spectroscopy of complex atoms, Re- views of Modern Physics68, 1015 (1996)

    1996

  17. [25]

    Aymar, A

    M. Aymar, A. Debarre, and O. Robaux, Highly excited levels of neutral ytterbium. II. Multichannel quantum defect analysis of odd- and even-parity spectra, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics13, 1089 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    Lehec, A

    H. Lehec, A. Zuliani, W. Maineult, E. Luc-Koenig, P. Pillet, P. Cheinet, F. Niyaz, and T. Gallagher, Laser and microwave spectroscopy of even-parity rydberg states of neutral ytterbium and multichannel-quantum- defect-theory analysis, Physical Review A98, 062506 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Peper, Y

    M. Peper, Y. Li, D. Y. Knapp, M. Bileska, S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. P. Horvath, A. P. Burg- ers, and J. D. Thompson, Spectroscopy and modeling of 171Yb rydberg states for high-fidelity two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. X15, 011009 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Kuroda, V

    R. Kuroda, V. M. Hughes, M. Poitrinal, M. Peper, and J. D. Thompson, Microwave spectroscopy and mul- tichannel quantum defect analysis of ytterbium 6snp, 6snf, and 6sngrydberg states, Phys. Rev. A112, 042817 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Andersen, Atomic negative ions: structure, dynamics and collisions, Physics Reports394, 157 (2004)

    T. Andersen, Atomic negative ions: structure, dynamics and collisions, Physics Reports394, 157 (2004)

    2004

  22. [30]

    Mitroy, M

    J. Mitroy, M. S. Safronova, and C. W. Clark, Theory and applications of atomic and ionic polarizabilities, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics43, 202001 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    M. K. Kristiansson, K. Chartkunchand, G. Ek- lund, O. M. Hole, E. K. Anderson, N. de Ruette, M. Kami´ nska, N. Punnakayathil, J. E. Navarro- Navarrete, S. Sigurdsson,et al., High-precision electron affinity of oxygen, Nature Communications13, 5906 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    A. O. Lindahl, J. Rohl´ en, H. Hultgren, I. Y. Kiyan, D. J. Pegg, C. Walter, and D. Hanstorp, Threshold pho- todetachment in a repulsive potential, Physical Review Letters108, 033004 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Saßmannshausen, F

    H. Saßmannshausen, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, Ex- perimental Characterization of Singlet Scattering Chan- nels in Long-Range Rydberg Molecules, Physical Re- view Letters114, 133201 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Engel, T

    F. Engel, T. Dieterle, T. Schmid, C. Tomschitz, C. Veit, N. Zuber, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Observation of Rydberg Blockade Induced by a Single Ion, Physical Review Letters121, 193401 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Peper and J

    M. Peper and J. Deiglmayr, Heteronuclear Long- Range Rydberg Molecules, Physical Review Letters 126, 013001 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Exner, R

    M. Exner, R. Srikumar, R. Bl¨ attner, M. T. Eiles, P. Schmelcher, and H. Ott, High Precision Spectroscopy 16 of Trilobite Rydberg Molecules, Physical Review Letters 134, 223401 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and J. M. Rost, Dressed ion-pair states of an ultralong-range ryd- berg molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 123401 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    E. L. Hamilton, C. H. Greene, and H. Sadegh- pour, Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular rydbergstates, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecu- lar and Optical Physics35, L199 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    Chibisov, A

    M. Chibisov, A. Khuskivadze, and I. Fabrikant, Ener- gies and dipole moments of long-range molecularryd- berg states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, L193 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. P. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Observation of ultralong-range rydberg molecules, Nature458, 1005 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, J. P. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, W. Li, J. Stanoje- vic, T. Pohl, and J. M. Rost, Rydberg trimers and excited dimers bound by internal quantum reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 163201 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Butscher, J

    B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, L. Kukota, V. Bendkowsky, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Atom–molecule coherence for ultralong-range Rydberg dimers, Nature Phys6, 970 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadegh- pour, and J. P. Shaffer, Production of trilobite ryd- berg molecule dimers with kilo-debye permanent electric dipole moments, Science348, 99 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    J. P. Shaffer, S. T. Rittenhouse, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultracold Rydberg molecules, Nature Communications 9, 1965 (2018)

    1965

  38. [46]

    M. T. Eiles, Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range Rydberg molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics52, 113001 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    C. Fey, F. Hummel, and P. Schmelcher, Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Molecular Physics118, e1679401 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    F. B. Dunning, S. K. Kanungo, and S. Yoshida, Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 212002 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadegh- pour, and J. P. Shaffer, Production of trilobite Ryd- berg molecule dimers with kilo-Debye permanent elec- tric dipole moments, Science348, 99 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Niederpr¨ um, O

    T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, T. Eichert, C. Lippe, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, C. H. Greene, and H. Ott, Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules, Nature Com- munications7, 12820 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    M. Deiß, S. Haze, J. Wolf, L. Wang, F. Meinert, C. Fey, F. Hummel, P. Schmelcher, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Observation of spin-orbit-dependent electron scattering using long-range Rydberg molecules, Physical Review Research2, 013047 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    B. J. DeSalvo, J. A. Aman, F. B. Dunning, T. C. Killian, H. R. Sadeghpour, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Ultra- long-range Rydberg molecules in a divalent atomic sys- tem, Physical Review A92, 031403 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Manthey, T

    T. Manthey, T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, and H. Ott, Dynamically probing ultracold lattice gases via Rydberg molecules, New Journal of Physics17, 103024 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Guttridge, T

    A. Guttridge, T. R. Hepworth, D. K. Ruttley, A. A. Durst, M. T. Eiles, and S. L. Cornish, Individual Assem- bly of Two-Species Rydberg Molecules Using Optical Tweezers, Physical Review Letters134, 133401 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    I. I. Fabrikant and V. S. Lebedev, Quenching of rydberg states by atoms with small electron affinities, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics33, 1521 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    Reicherts, T

    M. Reicherts, T. Roth, A. Gopalan, M.-W. Ruf, H. Ho- top, C. Desfran¸ cois, and I. I. Fabrikant, Controlled for- mation of weakly bound atomic negative ions by elec- tron transfer from state-selected Rydberg atoms, Euro- physics Letters40, 129 (1997)

    1997

  49. [57]

    Desfrancois, B

    C. Desfrancois, B. Baillon, J. Schermann, S. Arnold, J. Hendricks, and K. Bowen, Prediction and observation of a new, ground state, dipole-bound dimer anion: The mixed water/ammonia system, Physical review letters 72, 48 (1994)

    1994

  50. [58]

    Desfran¸ cois, H

    C. Desfran¸ cois, H. Abdoul-Carime, N. Khelifa, and J. Schermann, From 1 r to 1 r2 potentials: Electron ex- change between Rydberg atoms and polar molecules, Physical review letters73, 2436 (1994)

    1994

  51. [59]

    Schlagm¨ uller, T

    M. Schlagm¨ uller, T. C. Liebisch, F. Engel, K. S. Klein- bach, F. B¨ ottcher, U. Hermann, K. M. Westphal, A. Gaj, R. L¨ ow, S. Hofferberth, T. Pfau, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, and C. H. Greene, Ultracold Chemical Reactions of a Single Rydberg Atom in a Dense Gas, Physical Review X6,...

    2016

  52. [60]

    Srikumar, M

    R. Srikumar, M. Exner, R. Bl¨ attner, P. Schmelcher, M. T. Eiles, and H. Ott, Vibrationally highly excited trilobite molecules stabilized by nonadiabatic coupling, Physical Review Research7, 043103 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    M. Deiß, S. Haze, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Long-range atom–ion rydberg molecule: A novel molecular binding mechanism, Atoms9, 34 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Duspayev, X

    A. Duspayev, X. Han, M. A. Viray, L. Ma, J. Zhao, and G. Raithel, Long-range rydberg-atom–ion molecules of rb and cs, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023114 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Zuber, V

    N. Zuber, V. S. V. Anasuri, M. Berngruber, Y.-Q. Zou, F. Meinert, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Observation of a molecular bond between ions and Rydberg atoms, Na- ture605, 453 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Nuovo Cim.11, 157 (1934)

    E. Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Nuovo Cim.11, 157 (1934)

    1934

  57. [65]

    Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Ryd- berg states with neutral particles, Journal de Physique 38, 1343 (1977)

    A. Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in Ryd- berg states with neutral particles, Journal de Physique 38, 1343 (1977)

    1977

  58. [66]

    Idziaszek and T

    Z. Idziaszek and T. Calarco, Pseudopotential method for higher partial wave scattering, Physical review let- ters96, 013201 (2006)

    2006

  59. [67]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and J. M. Rost, Dressed ion-pair states of an ultralong-range Ryd- berg molecule, Physical Review Letters125, 123401 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    McEachran and M

    R. McEachran and M. Elford, The momentum trans- fer cross section and transport coefficients for low en- ergy electrons in mercury, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics36, 427 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    Bartschat and H

    K. Bartschat and H. Sadeghpour, Ultralow-energy electron scattering from alkaline-earth atoms: the scattering-length limit, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, 17 Molecular and Optical Physics36, L9 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    Dzuba and G

    V. Dzuba and G. Gribakin, Correlation-potential method for negative ions and electron scattering, Phys- ical Review A49, 2483 (1994)

    1994

  63. [71]

    Gribakina, G

    A. Gribakina, G. Gribakin, and V. Ivanov, The struc- ture and photodetachment of the Yb − negative ion, Physics Letters A168, 280 (1992)

    1992

  64. [72]

    Vosko, J

    S. Vosko, J. Chevary, and I. Mayer, Predictions of sta- ble Yb−in the P o 1/2 state: The importance of spin-orbit coupling, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics24, L225 (1991)

    1991

  65. [73]

    Felfli, A

    Z. Felfli, A. Msezane, and D. Sokolovski, Resonances in low-energy electron elastic cross sections for lan- thanide atoms, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics79, 012714 (2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    Felfli and A

    Z. Felfli and A. Z. Msezane, Low-energy electron elastic total cross sections for Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, and Hf atoms, Atoms8, 17 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Litherland, L

    A. Litherland, L. Kilius, M. Garwan, M.-J. Nadeau, and X.-L. Zhao, Observation of Yb− by accelerator mass spectrometry, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics24, L233 (1991)

    1991

  68. [76]

    Andersen, H

    T. Andersen, H. Haugen, and H. Hotop, Binding ener- gies in atomic negative ions: III, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data28, 1511 (1999)

    1999

  69. [78]

    S. M. O’Malley and D. R. Beck, Valence calculations of lanthanide anion binding energies: 6pattachments to 4f n6s2 thresholds, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molec- ular, and Optical Physics78, 012510 (2008)

    2008

  70. [79]

    Andersen, T

    H. Andersen, T. Andersen, and U. Pedersen, Search for stable or metastable negative Yb ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics31, 2239 (1998)

    1998

  71. [80]

    Reicherts,Bildung Schwachgebundener Atomarer Negativer Ionen in St¨ oßen Mit Zustandsselektierten Rydberg-Atomen, Doctoral thesis, Technische Univer- sit¨ at Kaiserslautern (2000)

    M. Reicherts,Bildung Schwachgebundener Atomarer Negativer Ionen in St¨ oßen Mit Zustandsselektierten Rydberg-Atomen, Doctoral thesis, Technische Univer- sit¨ at Kaiserslautern (2000)

    2000

  72. [81]

    R. Ali, M. Yaseen, A. Nadeem, S. A. Bhatti, and M. A. Baig, Two-colour three-photon excitation of the 6snf 1,3F3 and 6snp 1P1, 3P1,2 Rydberg levels of Yb I, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics32, 953 (1999)

    1999

  73. [82]

    Peper,Precision spectroscopy of ultracold Rydberg atoms and molecules, Doctoral thesis, ETH Zurich (2020)

    M. Peper,Precision spectroscopy of ultracold Rydberg atoms and molecules, Doctoral thesis, ETH Zurich (2020)

    2020

  74. [83]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and J. M. Rost, Generalized local frame-transformation theory for ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Phys. Rev. A102, 033315 (2020)

    2020

  75. [84]

    Tarana and R

    M. Tarana and R. ˇCur ´ ık, Adiabatic potential-energy curves of long-range Rydberg molecules: Two-electron R-matrix approach, Physical Review A93, 012515 (2016)

    2016

  76. [85]

    D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Photoas- sociation of long-rangendRydberg molecules, Physical review letters112, 163201 (2014)

    2014

  77. [86]

    M. T. Eiles and C. H. Greene, Hamiltonian for the in- clusion of spin effects in long-range Rydberg molecules, Physical Review A95, 042515 (2017)

    2017

  78. [87]

    C. Fey, M. Kurz, P. Schmelcher, S. T. Rittenhouse, and H. R. Sadeghpour, A comparative analysis of binding in ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, New Journal of Physics17, 055010 (2015)

    2015

  79. [88]

    C. H. Greene and M. T. Eiles, Green’s-function treat- ment of Rydberg molecules with spins, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042805 (2023)

    2023

  80. [89]

    Engel, T

    F. Engel, T. Dieterle, F. Hummel, C. Fey, P. Schmelcher, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Precision spectroscopy of negative-ion resonances in ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, Physical Review Letters123, 073003 (2019)

    2019

  81. [90]

    Wojciechowska, M

    A. Wojciechowska, M. Tomza, and M. T. Eiles, Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules of Hg atoms, Phys. Rev. A111, 042816 (2025)

    2025

  82. [91]

    E. L. Hamilton,Photoionization, photodissociation, and long-range bond formation in molecular Rydberg states, Doctoral thesis, University of Colorado (2003)

    2003

  83. [92]

    A. A. T. Durst, M. Simi´ c, N. Abraham, and M. T. Eiles, Nonadiabatic couplings as a stabilization mechanism in long-range Rydberg molecules, Physical Review A111, 032811 (2025)

    2025

  84. [93]

    X. Wang, T. Muthu-Arachchige, T. Legrand, L. M¨ uller, W. Alt, S. Hofferberth, and E. Uru˜ nuela, Two-color ytterbium magneto-optical trap in a compact dual- chamber setup, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 014004 (2025)

    2025

  85. [94]

    Kitagawa, K

    M. Kitagawa, K. Enomoto, K. Kasa, Y. Takahashi, R. Ciury lo, P. Naidon, and P. S. Julienne, Two-color photoassociation spectroscopy of ytterbium atoms and the precise determinations ofs-wave scattering lengths, Physical Review A77, 012719 (2008)

    2008

  86. [95]

    A. Gaj, A. T. Krupp, J. B. Balewski, R. L¨ ow, S. Hoffer- berth, and T. Pfau, From molecular spectra to a den- sity shift in dense Rydberg gases, Nat Commun5, 4546 (2014)

    2014

  87. [96]

    Camargo, R

    F. Camargo, R. Schmidt, J. Whalen, R. Ding, G. Woehl, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. Dunning, H. Sadeghpour, E. Demler, and T. Killian, Creation of Rydberg Polarons in a Bose Gas, Physical Review Letters120, 083401 (2018)

    2018

  88. [97]

    Bahrim, I

    C. Bahrim, I. Fabrikant, and U. Thumm, Boundary con- ditions for the Pauli equation: Application to photode- tachment of Cs −, Physical Review Letters87, 123003 (2001)

    2001

  89. [98]

    Bahrim, U

    C. Bahrim, U. Thumm, A. A. Khuskivadze, and I. I. Fabrikant, Near-threshold photodetachment of heavy alkali-metal anions, Phys. Rev. A66, 052712 (2002)

    2002

  90. [99]

    These labels should not to be confused withl r ands r from Eq. 4

  91. [100]

    T. F. O’Malley, L. Rosenberg, and L. Spruch, Low- energy scattering of a charged particle by a neutral po- larizable system, Physical Review125, 1300 (1962)

    1962

  92. [101]

    T. F. O’Malley, Low-energy expansion of the scattering amplitude for long-range quadrupole potentials, Physi- cal Review134, A1188 (1964)

    1964

  93. [102]

    Dzuba and A

    V. Dzuba and A. Derevianko, Dynamic polarizabilities and related properties of clock states of the ytterbium atom, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics43, 074011 (2010)

    2010

  94. [103]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firsten- berg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of rydberg interaction potentials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 133001 (2017). 18

    2017

  95. [104]

    Aymar, R

    M. Aymar, R. J. Champeau, C. Delsart, and O. Robaux, Three-step laser spectroscopy and multichannel quan- tum defect analysis of odd-parity rydberg states of neu- tral ytterbium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molec- ular Physics17, 3645 (1984)

    1984

  96. [105]

    M. T. Eiles and C. H. Greene, Ultracold long-range rydberg molecules with complex multichannel spectra, Physical Review Letters115, 193201 (2015)

    2015

  97. [106]

    S. K. Kanungo, J. D. Whalen, Y. Lu, T. C. Killian, F. B. Dunning, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Loss rates for high-n,49≲n≲150,5sns( 3S1) Rydberg atoms excited in an 84Sr Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A102, 063317 (2020)

    2020

  98. [107]

    Schlagm¨ uller, T

    M. Schlagm¨ uller, T. C. Liebisch, H. Nguyen, G. Loc- head, F. Engel, F. B¨ ottcher, K. M. Westphal, K. S. Kleinbach, R. L¨ ow, S. Hofferberth,et al., Probing an electron scattering resonance using Rydberg molecules within a dense and ultracold gas, Physical review letters 116...

    2016

  99. [108]

    S. T. Rittenhouse and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultracold Gi- ant Polyatomic Rydberg Molecules: Coherent Control of Molecular Orientation, Physical Review Letters104, 243002 (2010)

    2010

  100. [109]

    Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, H

    R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, H. Sadeghpour, and P. Schmelcher, Rotational hybridization, and control of alignment and orientation in triatomic ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, New Journal of Physics17, 013021 (2015)

    2015

  101. [110]

    Guttridge, D

    A. Guttridge, D. K. Ruttley, A. C. Baldock, R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, H. Sadeghpour, C. Adams, and S. L. Cornish, Observation of Rydberg Blockade Due to the Charge-Dipole Interaction between an Atom and a Polar Molecule, Physical Review Letters131, 013401 (2023)

    2023

  102. [111]

    Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, J

    R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, J. Shertzer, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Ultralong-range Rydberg bimolecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 043401 (2021)

    2021

  103. [112]

    Hollerith, J

    S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, J. Rui, A. Rubio-Abadal, V. Walther, T. Pohl, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Quantum gas microscopy of Rydberg macrodimers, Science364, 664 (2019)

    2019

  104. [113]

    Saßmannshausen, J

    H. Saßmannshausen, J. Deiglmayr, and F. Merkt, Long- range Rydberg molecules, Rydberg macrodimers and Rydberg aggregates in an ultracold Cs gas, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics225, 2891 (2016)

    2016

  105. [114]

    Boisseau, I

    C. Boisseau, I. Simbotin, and R. Cˆ ot´ e, Macrodimers: Ultralong Range Rydberg Molecules, Physical Review Letters88, 133004 (2002)

    2002

  106. [115]

    A. R. Edmonds,Angular Momentum in Quantum Me- chanics(Princeton University Press, 1996)

    1996

  107. [116]

    Hostler and R

    L. Hostler and R. Pratt, Coulomb green’s function in closed form, Physical Review Letters10, 469 (1963)

    1963

  108. [117]

    O. I. Tolstikhin, V. N. Ostrovsky, and H. Nakamura, Siegert pseudo-states as a universal tool: Resonances, S matrix, green function, Physical Review Letters79, 2026 (1997)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.