Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

The central charges of the trace anomaly make bulk and boundary black-hole thermodynamics exactly dual, with matching phase transitions and topological charges.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:03 UTC pith:MYZ67V2V

load-bearing objection Competent extension of the holographic CFT-thermodynamics dictionary to charged Gauss–Bonnet AdS black holes, but the boundary first law is asserted rather than verified because the chemical potentials are never shown. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.21608 v3 pith:MYZ67V2V submitted 2025-12-25 hep-th gr-qc

Topological perspective on bulk boundary thermodynamic equivalence

classification hep-th gr-qc MSC 83C5783E0581T40 PACS 04.70.Dy11.25.Tq04.60.Cf
keywords AdS/CFT correspondenceblack hole thermodynamicsGauss-Bonnet gravitytrace anomalycentral chargesthermodynamic topologyphase transitionsholographic first law
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the extended thermodynamics of five-dimensional charged Gauss–Bonnet AdS black holes is exactly mirrored by the thermodynamics of the dual four-dimensional CFT, once the two trace-anomaly central charges C and A are treated as independent thermodynamic variables. The authors construct a holographic dictionary that maps the extended bulk first law to a CFT first law with two chemical potentials, and they show that the CFT phase structure—including oscillatory behavior and swallowtail free energy—coincides with the bulk black hole's. They further compute topological charges for first-order phase transitions and the critical point on both sides and find they agree. If correct, this establishes the two central charges as the missing thermodynamic variables that make bulk–boundary first laws match in higher-curvature gravity.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is an exact duality between the extended thermodynamics of a five-dimensional charged Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole and that of its holographic dual CFT, with the two trace-anomaly central charges C and A entering as independent thermodynamic variables alongside entropy, charge, and volume. Using a conformal factor ω=R/L and the trace-anomaly expressions (2.18)–(2.19), the authors derive a CFT first law with chemical potentials for C and A and an Euler relation matching the Smarr relation. They show that the critical point and the first-order phase transition of the CFT coincide exactly with those of the bulk black hole, and that the thermodynamic topological charges—

What carries the argument

The central object is the holographic dictionary (2.23) together with the trace-anomaly central charges (2.18)–(2.19). The dictionary maps the bulk mass, temperature, charge, and electrical potential to boundary quantities through the conformal factor ω=R/L, and treats the curvature radius R (hence the boundary volume 𝒱=2π²R³) as a thermodynamic variable. The two central charges C and A, which split due to the Gauss–Bonnet term, serve as independent thermodynamic variables with their own chemical potentials, making the CFT first law and Euler relation possible. This machinery carries the argument by allowing a precise term-by-term match between bulk and boundary first laws and Smarr relation

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the holographic dictionary—setting the conformal factor to ω=R/L and treating the trace-anomaly central charges C and A as independent thermodynamic variables—is the physically correct description of the boundary theory, rather than just a formal rewriting of the bulk first law.

What would settle it

A direct way to test the claim is to compute the boundary CFT free energy from the proposed first law, including the μ_C and μ_A terms, and check whether the resulting on-shell Euclidean action matches the bulk action with the same couplings; any mismatch would indicate the dictionary is not a true duality. Alternatively, one could check whether the integrability condition ∂²E/∂C∂A = ∂²E/∂A∂C holds for the explicit expressions; if it fails, the chemical potentials are not well-defined.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the duality holds, the two central charges C and A are the correct thermodynamic variables that encode the extended first law of higher-curvature AdS black holes in the boundary theory.
  • The matching of phase structure implies that the small–large black hole phase transition and its critical point are faithfully reproduced in the CFT, reinforcing the holographic interpretation of black hole chemistry.
  • The equality of topological charges shows that the topological classification of phase transitions—phase transition total charge Q=1 and critical point charge Q_CP=1—is a robust bulk–boundary invariant.
  • The general framework can be extended to higher-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet gravity and other higher-curvature theories with multiple central charges, providing a template for their holographic thermodynamics.
  • The construction suggests that varying the central charges in the CFT corresponds to deforming the bulk theory by higher-curvature couplings, offering a dictionary between coupling constants and boundary thermodynamic variables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper strongly suggests that the trace anomaly's central charges are not just bookkeeping devices but are the physical variables that make the boundary theory 'extended' in exactly the same way the bulk is extended by the cosmological constant and Gauss–Bonnet coupling; if the dictionary is correct, the bulk pressure and Gauss–Bonnet coupling are encoded jointly in C, A, and 𝒱.
  • A testable extension is to compute the chemical potentials μ_C and μ_A explicitly and verify that they satisfy the integrability conditions implied by the first law; if they do not, the 'exact duality' would reduce to a formal rescaling.
  • One could push the topological correspondence further by examining other topological invariants (e.g., the topological charge of isolated critical points or reentrant phase transitions) in Gauss–Bonnet gravity and its CFT dual, to see if the coincidence persists beyond the simple small–large transition.
  • The paper's reliance on treating C and A as independent variables implies a prediction: in the boundary field theory, there exist conserved or quasi-conserved charges conjugated to the anomaly coefficients, and their fluctuations should show up in correlation functions—something that could be looked for in holographic models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an exact holographic dictionary between the extended thermodynamics of five-dimensional charged Gauss–Bonnet AdS black holes and the thermodynamics of the dual four-dimensional CFT. The boundary system is described by a first law containing two chemical potentials μ_C and μ_A conjugate to the two trace-anomaly central charges C and A, together with a pressure–volume term built from the boundary radius R. The authors claim that the phase structure, critical point, and thermodynamic topological charges of the CFT coincide exactly with those of the bulk black hole. The technical development is based on a holographic dictionary (2.23), central-charge formulas (2.18)–(2.19), and the identification P = E/(3V) and μ_{C,A} as partial derivatives of E.

Significance. The idea that in higher-curvature gravity the two trace-anomaly central charges are the natural missing thermodynamic variables for a boundary first law is attractive and timely. The paper addresses a real gap in the holographic thermodynamics literature, and the topological analysis is systematic and clearly presented. If the dictionary and the algebraic reductions are correct, the result would provide a nontrivial extension of the bulk–boundary thermodynamic equivalence to Gauss–Bonnet gravity and would sharpen the topological bulk–boundary correspondence. The paper also connects to a growing body of work on holographic thermodynamics with central-charge variations. However, the central first-law equivalence is not actually verified in the manuscript, and there are concrete arithmetic inconsistencies in the boundary expressions that affect the critical-point claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.21)–(2.24)] The central claim is the boundary first law (2.21), but μ_C and μ_A are never explicitly given; the text states only that they are too complex to present. Consequently, (2.21) and the Euler relation (2.22) are asserted, not demonstrated. The later critical-point and topological computations use E, T, and F directly, so they do not test the first-law equivalence. Please provide the chemical potentials explicitly or give a proof that (2.21) follows from the bulk first law (2.14) under the dictionary (2.23).
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.26)–(2.27) vs Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.8)–(2.9)] Substituting P=3/(8πL^2), r_h=Lx, Q=L^2y, α=λL^2 into the mass formula (2.8) gives M = πL^2(6x^6 + 12λx^2 + 12x^4 + y^2)/(32x^2). The dictionary (2.23) then implies numerator 6x^6 in E, not 12x^6 as in (2.26). Similarly, (2.9) gives T_b = (12x^6 + 12x^4 − y^2)/(48πλR x^3 + 24πR x^5), not (24x^6 + 12x^4 − y^2) as in (2.27). This factor-of-two error shifts the neutral critical point: solving the correct T for y=0 gives x_c=1/√3 and λ_c=1/18, whereas Eq. (2.34) reports x_c=1/√6, λ_c=1/36. The latter is also inconsistent with Eq. (2.36): λ_c=1/36 implies L^2=36α and P_c=3/(8πL^2)=1/(96πα), not 1/(48πα). The correct critical point from the bulk formulas reproduces Eq. (2.36). This propagates into the critical-point and topology sections.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.30)] With V=2π^2R^3 and E given by (2.26), the definition P=E/(3V) of Eq. (2.24) yields P = L^3(12λx^2+12x^6+12x^4+y^2)/(192πR^4x^2), not the expression in Eq. (2.30), whose denominator is 48πR^4x^2. Thus the pressure appearing in the boundary first law (2.21) is a factor of 4 too large, independent of the factor-of-two issue in E. This casts doubt on the -P dV term in the claimed first-law equivalence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout Sec. 2] The symbol A is used both for the bulk conjugate to the Gauss–Bonnet coupling (Eq. 2.13) and for the boundary central charge (Eq. 2.19). Please use distinct notation to avoid confusion.
  2. [Eq. (2.21)] The boundary pressure P and volume V in Eq. (2.21) use the same symbols as the bulk pressure and volume in Eq. (2.7). Consider using different letters or adding a subscript.
  3. [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.32)–(2.33)] The closed-form critical-point expressions are presented without derivation. Please include the derivation or relegate it to an appendix, and specify how the 'typographical errors in Ref. [46]' were corrected.
  4. [Figures 1–3] The axis labels in the figures (e.g., 'S-' and 'T-') appear corrupted or truncated. Please regenerate the figures with proper labels.
  5. [References] Reference [67] is incompletely formatted; please provide full bibliographic details. Also, the phrase 'Unlike some of our authors’ previous work [59]' in Sec. 3.2 is informal; say 'In contrast to Ref. [59]'.

Circularity Check

4 steps flagged

Boundary thermodynamics is defined by rescaling bulk quantities via (2.23), so the claimed bulk-boundary 'exact duality' and coincident critical points/topological charges are restatements of the bulk first law rather than independent predictions.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.23)]
    "The holographic dictionary relating the thermodynamic variables of the boundary CFT to the bulk is ˜E= M/ω , ˜T= T/ω , ˜S=S, ˜Φ = Φ/(ωL) , ˜Q=QL. (2.23)"

    The boundary CFT variables are defined as rescaled bulk quantities, with C and A in (2.18)-(2.19) also functions of the same bulk L and λ. Any later 'correspondence' between boundary and bulk first laws, critical points, or phase structure is therefore a consequence of this defining dictionary, not an independent cross-check.

  2. self definitional [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.21)-(2.24)]
    "The thermodynamic pressure P, and the chemical potentials μ_C and μ_A conjugate to the thermodynamic volume V and the central charges C and A, respectively, are defined as P=˜E/(3V), μ_C=(∂˜E/∂C)_{S,˜Q,V,A}, μ_A=(∂˜E/∂A)_{S,˜Q,V,C}. (2.24) Due to the complexity of the exact expressions for the chemical potentials μ_C and μ_A, we do not present them explicitly here."

    If μ_C and μ_A are defined as the partial derivatives of ˜E, then (2.21) is the total differential of ˜E and is true by definition. Since the paper never exhibits μ_C or μ_A or derives (2.21) from the boundary field theory, the claimed 'precise correspondence between the extended first laws' is not independently verified; it is a formal identity.

  3. renaming known result [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.34)-(2.36)]
    "A straightforward calculation based on Eq. (2.34) shows that the critical point of the boundary theory coincides with that of the five-dimensional neutral Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole [43,46] r_hc=√6α, P_c=1/(48πα), T_c=1/(2√6απ). (2.36)"

    From (2.23), T~=T/ω and S~=S; in the fixed (Q~,V,C,A) ensemble ω=R/L is fixed, so the boundary critical-point equations (2.31) are exactly the bulk conditions up to a constant. The equality of critical points is inherited from the dictionary and is a renaming of the known bulk critical point, not a new boundary prediction.

  4. renaming known result [Sec. 3.2 and 3.3, Eqs. (3.6)-(3.10), (3.20)]
    "The zero point of the vector field ϕ is located at τ=1/T~, Θ=π/2. (3.10) This confirms that the free energy of the CFT coincides with the zero point of the vector field ϕ."

    The boundary generalized free energy (3.6) and the vector-field component (3.9) are built from the same dictionary-rescaled ˜E and T~; the zero-point condition τ=1/T~ is the bulk on-shell condition in new variables. The resulting topological charges (Q=1 and Q_CP=1) therefore coincide with the bulk charges by construction, not as an independent topological test of the duality.

full rationale

The central reduction is the dictionary (2.23): every boundary thermodynamic quantity is a rescaling of a bulk quantity, while the two central charges C,A (2.18)-(2.19) are just combinations of the bulk parameters L and λ. The boundary first law (2.21) is then set up by defining μ_C and μ_A as partial derivatives (2.24), so it is automatically a total differential of ˜E; the paper explicitly declines to present these chemical potentials. Consequently the 'exact duality' of the first laws is a definitional identity rather than a derived check. The coincident critical point (2.36) and the coincident topological charges Q=Q_CP=1 are obtained from the same pulled-back expressions, so they are forced by the dictionary. The bulk thermodynamics and the anomaly coefficients are independently known and are not themselves circular, but the paper's advertised boundary-side derivation adds no independent thermodynamic content beyond the chosen rescaling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The two central charges are standard trace-anomaly coefficients from Refs. [55,56,57]. The only free parameter is the boundary radius R (or conformal factor ω), which is chosen as a thermodynamic variable following Ref. [35].

free parameters (1)
  • Boundary curvature radius R (conformal factor ω=R/L) = not fitted; set to 10000 in figures
    R is a free parameter of the boundary construction. It sets the boundary volume V=2π²R³ and rescales E_tilde, T_tilde; the paper treats it as an independent thermodynamic variable. The choice ω=R/L comes from conformal symmetry, but any R gives a valid description, so the duality is only defined up to this rescaling.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The holographic dictionary (2.23): E_tilde=M/ω, T_tilde=T/ω, S_tilde=S, Φ_tilde=Φ/(ωL), Q_tilde=QL, with ω=R/L
    The paper adopts this dictionary from Ref. [35] without derivation; it is the central mapping that defines the boundary thermodynamics, so the first law matching is baked in.
  • domain assumption The central charges C and A of the boundary CFT are given by the trace anomaly formulas (2.18)-(2.19)
    Taken from Refs. [56,57]; the paper does not derive these but uses them as the independent thermodynamic variables.
  • domain assumption The bulk first law includes the Gauss-Bonnet coupling α as a thermodynamic variable with conjugate A (Eq. 2.14)
    Adopted from Ref. [46]; without it, varying the central charges on the boundary has no bulk counterpart.
  • standard math Duan's φ-mapping topological current theorem (Eqs. 3.1-3.5) and the winding-number computation via the deflection angle Ω
    Standard topology used without proof.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14305 in / 14882 out tokens · 143771 ms · 2026-08-03T14:03:09.595635+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We establish an exact duality between the extended thermodynamics of five-dimensional charged Gauss-Bonnet AdS black holes and the thermodynamic framework of the dual boundary conformal field theory (CFT). The thermodynamics of the dual CFT involves two central charges originating from the trace anomaly. We demonstrate a precise correspondence between the extended first laws on the bulk and boundary sides. Moreover, the topological charges of the CFT thermodynamics, associated with the phase transition and critical point, coincide with those of the corresponding bulk black hole.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Noncommutative black holes: Topological bulk-boundary correspondence and Binary Merger Bounds

    gr-qc 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    For noncommutative RN-AdS black holes, the paper claims bulk and boundary thermodynamic topological charges equal to zero and derives perturbative second-law corrections to the remnant-mass bound.

  2. Topological charges and confined-deconfined phase transition in holography

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Introducing an energy scale in AdS space changes the topological class of black holes, corresponding to confined and deconfined phases separated by a Hawking-Page transition at finite critical temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 60 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bardeen, B

    J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking,The Four laws of black hole mechanics,Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161

  2. [2]

    Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett

    J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737

  3. [3]

    Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys

    J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333

  4. [4]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029]

  5. [5]

    Maldacena and A

    J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,Statistical entropy of four-dimensional extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 428 [hep-th/9603060]

  6. [6]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Insight into the Microscopic Structure of an AdS Black Hole from a Thermodynamical Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 111302 [1502.00386]

  7. [7]

    Hawking and D.N

    S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

  8. [8]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

  9. [9]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Charged AdS black holes and catastrophic holography,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 064018 [hep-th/9902170]

  10. [10]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C.V. Johnson and R.C. Myers,Holography, thermodynamics and fluctuations of charged AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104026 [hep-th/9904197]

  11. [11]

    Kastor, S

    D. Kastor, S. Ray and J. Traschen,Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 195011 [0904.2765]

  12. [12]

    Kubiznak and R.B

    D. Kubiznak and R.B. Mann,P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes,JHEP07(2012) 033 [1205.0559]

  13. [13]

    Zou, S.-J

    D.-C. Zou, S.-J. Zhang and B. Wang,Critical behavior of Born-Infeld AdS black holes in the extended phase space thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 044002 [1311.7299]

  14. [14]

    Liu, D.-C

    Y. Liu, D.-C. Zou and B. Wang,Signature of the Van der Waals like small-large charged AdS black hole phase transition in quasinormal modes,JHEP09(2014) 179 [1405.2644]

  15. [15]

    Cheng, S.-W

    P. Cheng, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Critical phenomena in the extended phase space of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 024025 [1603.08694]. – 17 –

  16. [16]

    Xie and S.-J

    H. Xie and S.-J. Yang,Probing phase transitions of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space with Lyapunov exponent,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1374 [2510.23387]

  17. [17]

    Frassino, D

    A.M. Frassino, D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and F. Simovic,Multiple Reentrant Phase Transitions and Triple Points in Lovelock Thermodynamics,JHEP09(2014) 080 [1406.7015]

  18. [18]

    Altamirano, D

    N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak and R.B. Mann,Reentrant phase transitions in rotating anti–de Sitter black holes,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 101502 [1306.5756]

  19. [19]

    Altamirano, D

    N. Altamirano, D. Kubizňák, R.B. Mann and Z. Sherkatghanad,Kerr-AdS analogue of triple point and solid/liquid/gas phase transition,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 042001 [1308.2672]

  20. [20]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Triple points and phase diagrams in the extended phase space of charged Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 044057 [1402.2837]

  21. [21]

    Ahmed, D

    M.B. Ahmed, D. Kubiznak and R.B. Mann,Vortex-antivortex pair creation in black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 046013 [2207.02147]

  22. [22]

    Hu, Y.-S

    Y.-P. Hu, Y.-S. An, G.-Y. Sun, W.-L. You, D.-N. Shi, H. Zhang et al.,Quantum anomaly triggers the violation of scaling laws in gravitational system,2410.23783

  23. [23]

    Yang, S.-P

    S.-J. Yang, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Deciphering black hole phase transitions through photon spheres,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025) 120412 [2505.20860]

  24. [24]

    Hennigar, R.B

    R.A. Hennigar, R.B. Mann and E. Tjoa,Superfluid Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 021301 [1609.02564]

  25. [25]

    N.-C. Bai, L. Li and J. Tao,Superfluidλtransition in charged AdS black holes,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66(2023) 120411 [2305.15258]

  26. [26]

    Kubiznak, R.B

    D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and M. Teo,Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 063001 [1608.06147]

  27. [27]

    Y. Xiao, Y. Tian and Y.-X. Liu,Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics from Extended Iyer-Wald Formalism,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 021401 [2308.12630]

  28. [28]

    Xiao, Y.-X

    Y. Xiao, Y.-X. Liu, Y. Tian and H. Zhang,Explicit and universal formula for thermodynamic volume in extended black hole thermodynamics,2512.01916

  29. [29]

    Hajian and B

    K. Hajian and B. Tekin,Coupling Constants as Conserved Charges in Black Hole Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 191401 [2309.07634]

  30. [30]

    Frassino, J.F

    A.M. Frassino, J.F. Pedraza, A. Svesko and M.R. Visser,Higher-Dimensional Origin of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 161501 [2212.14055]

  31. [31]

    Mancilla,Generalized Euler equation from effective action: implications for the smarr formula in AdS black holes,JHEP11(2025) 089 [2410.06605]

    R. Mancilla,Generalized Euler equation from effective action: implications for the smarr formula in AdS black holes,JHEP11(2025) 089 [2410.06605]

  32. [32]

    Visser,Holographic thermodynamics requires a chemical potential for color,Phys

    M.R. Visser,Holographic thermodynamics requires a chemical potential for color,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 106014 [2101.04145]

  33. [33]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  34. [34]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]. – 18 –

  35. [35]

    Ahmed, W

    M.B. Ahmed, W. Cong, D. Kubizňák, R.B. Mann and M.R. Visser,Holographic Dual of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 181401 [2302.08163]

  36. [36]

    T.-F. Gong, J. Jiang and M. Zhang,Holographic thermodynamics of rotating black holes,JHEP 06(2023) 105 [2305.00267]

  37. [37]

    Ahmed, W

    M.B. Ahmed, W. Cong, D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and M.R. Visser,Holographic CFT phase transitions and criticality for rotating AdS black holes,JHEP08(2023) 142 [2305.03161]

  38. [38]

    Baruah and P

    A. Baruah and P. Phukon,CFT phase transition analysis of charged, rotating black holes in D=4: A holographic thermodynamics approach,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066022 [2407.02997]

  39. [39]

    W. Cong, D. Kubizňák, R.B. Mann and M.R. Visser,Holographic dictionary for Lifshitz and hyperscaling violating black holes,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L061901 [2410.16145]

  40. [40]

    Zhang, W.-D

    M. Zhang, W.-D. Tan, M. Lu, D. Bhattacharya, J. Yang and R.B. Mann,Finite-cutoff Holographic Thermodynamics,2507.01010

  41. [41]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

  42. [42]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. Sen and S. Gangopadhyay,Breaking of the universal nature of the central charge criticality in AdS black holes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 046005 [2211.00925]

  43. [43]

    Yang, M.S

    S.-J. Yang, M.S. Ali, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Holographic thermodynamics of a five-dimensional neutral Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 420 [2408.00318]

  44. [44]

    Afshar, M.R

    M.A.S. Afshar, M.R. Alipour, S. Noori Gashti and J. Sadeghi,Topological insights into black hole thermodynamics: non-extensive entropy in CFT framework,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 457 [2501.00955]

  45. [45]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Critical phenomena and thermodynamic geometry of charged Gauss-Bonnet AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 044014 [1209.1707]

  46. [46]

    Cai, L.-M

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, L. Li and R.-Q. Yang,P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space,JHEP09(2013) 005 [1306.6233]

  47. [47]

    X. Lyu, J. Tao and P. Wang,Probing the thermodynamics of charged Gauss Bonnet AdS black holes with the Lyapunov exponent,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 974 [2312.11912]

  48. [48]

    Boulware and S

    D.G. Boulware and S. Deser,String Generated Gravity Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.55(1985) 2656

  49. [49]

    Yang, J.-J

    S.-J. Yang, J.-J. Wan, J. Chen, J. Yang and Y.-Q. Wang,Weak cosmic censorship conjecture for the novel4Dcharged Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black hole with test scalar field and particle,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 937 [2004.07934]

  50. [50]

    Cai,Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces,Phys

    R.-G. Cai,Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 084014 [hep-th/0109133]

  51. [51]

    Wiltshire,Spherically Symmetric Solutions of Einstein-maxwell Theory With a Gauss-Bonnet Term,Phys

    D.L. Wiltshire,Spherically Symmetric Solutions of Einstein-maxwell Theory With a Gauss-Bonnet Term,Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 36

  52. [52]

    Cvetic, S

    M. Cvetic, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,Black hole thermodynamics and negative entropy in de Sitter and anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,Nucl. Phys. B628(2002) 295 [hep-th/0112045]. – 19 –

  53. [53]

    Li and J

    R. Li and J. Wang,Generalized free energy landscapes of charged Gauss-Bonnet-AdS black holes in diverse dimensions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 044057 [2304.03425]

  54. [54]

    Karch and B

    A. Karch and B. Robinson,Holographic Black Hole Chemistry,JHEP12(2015) 073 [1510.02472]

  55. [55]

    Duff,Observations on Conformal Anomalies,Nucl

    M.J. Duff,Observations on Conformal Anomalies,Nucl. Phys. B125(1977) 334

  56. [56]

    Myers, M.F

    R.C. Myers, M.F. Paulos and A. Sinha,Holographic studies of quasi-topological gravity,JHEP 08(2010) 035 [1004.2055]

  57. [57]

    Myers and A

    R.C. Myers and A. Sinha,Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions,JHEP01(2011) 125 [1011.5819]

  58. [58]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Topology of black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 104003 [2112.01706]

  59. [59]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu and R.B. Mann,Black Hole Solutions as Topological Thermodynamic Defects,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 191101 [2208.01932]

  60. [60]

    Wu, S.-J

    S.-P. Wu, S.-J. Yang and S.-W. Wei,Extended thermodynamical topology of black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1372 [2508.01614]

  61. [61]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu and R.B. Mann,Universal topological classifications of black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L081501 [2409.09333]

  62. [62]

    D. Wu, W. Liu, S.-Q. Wu and R.B. Mann,Novel topological classes in black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L061501 [2411.10102]

  63. [63]

    Fan,Topological interpretation for phase transitions of black holes,Phys

    Z.-Y. Fan,Topological interpretation for phase transitions of black holes,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 044026 [2211.12957]

  64. [64]

    Babaei-Aghbolagh, H

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, H. Esmaili, S. He and H. Mohammadzadeh,Thermodynamic topology of Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Theories,2508.14453

  65. [65]

    C. Fang, J. Jiang and M. Zhang,Revisiting thermodynamic topologies of black holes,JHEP01 (2023) 102 [2211.15534]

  66. [66]

    Zhang and J

    M. Zhang and J. Jiang,Bulk-boundary thermodynamic equivalence: a topology viewpoint,JHEP 06(2023) 115 [2303.17515]

  67. [67]

    Duan and M.-L

    Y.-S. Duan and M.-L. Ge,SU(2) Gauge Theory and Electrodynamics with N Magnetic Monopoles,Sci. Sin.9(1979)

  68. [68]

    York, Jr.,Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,Phys

    J.W. York, Jr.,Black hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action,Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 2092

  69. [69]

    S.-J. Yang, R. Zhou, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Kinetics of a phase transition for a Kerr-AdS black hole on the free-energy landscape,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 084030 [2105.00491]

  70. [70]

    Liu and J

    C. Liu and J. Wang,Topological natures of the Gauss-Bonnet black hole in AdS space,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 064023 [2211.05524]

  71. [71]

    Jeon, B.-H

    I. Jeon, B.-H. Lee, W. Lee and M. Mishra,Stability and topological nature of charged Gauss-Bonnet AdS black holes in five dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 064006 [2407.20016]. – 20 –