Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The generalized effective-range expansion with the one-particle-exchange left-hand cut is extended to O(k^6) and to relativistic kinematics, with order-by-order convergence to exact Yukawa amplitudes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 11:49 UTC pith:7JFLXDHF

load-bearing objection The nonrelativistic higher-order ERE is a real extension and worth refereeing, but the relativistic section has a wrong left-hand-cut endpoint (Eq. (31)) and as written cannot describe the cut. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2601.04989 v2 pith:7JFLXDHF submitted 2026-01-08 hep-ph nucl-th

Effective Range Expansion with the Left-Hand Cut: Higher Order Improvements

Wen-Jia Wang , Bing Wu , Meng-Lin Du , Feng-Kun Guo This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords effective range expansionleft-hand cutone-particle exchangeYukawa potentialLippmann-Schwinger equationN/D methodnear-threshold scatteringrelativistic kinematics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the effective-range expansion, the standard model-independent parameterization of low-energy two-body scattering, can be systematically improved when a one-particle-exchange left-hand cut is present. The authors derive explicit higher-order terms, up to O(k^6), for the functions that encode the cut, and construct a kinematically relativistic version. They test the parameterization against exact Lippmann-Schwinger solutions of the Yukawa potential over a wide range of coupling strengths, and find order-by-order convergence toward the exact amplitude. If correct, this allows near-threshold scattering data—for example from lattice QCD—to be analyzed beyond the narrow energy window where the traditional ERE applies.

Core claim

The central claim is that the generalized ERE with the left-hand cut is a systematically improvable framework. The authors derive analytic expressions for the u-channel left-hand-cut functions L_u(k^2) and d_R,u(k^2) through O(k^6), starting from the exact one-particle-exchange potential and removing remote branch points. They also present a relativistic version in which the cut endpoints M_1 and M_2 come from the full two-body kinematics. Comparing with Lippmann-Schwinger solutions for a Yukawa potential, the parameterization reproduces both real and imaginary parts of the amplitude for couplings ranging from repulsive (g=-20) to deeply bound (g=40) in the t-channel, and for g=-50 in the u-

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized ERE parameterization 1/f(k^2) = [d-bar(k^2) - g-bar d_R(k^2)]/[n-bar(k^2) + g-bar(L(k^2)-L_0)] - i k, built from N/D dispersion theory. The functions L(k^2) and d_R(k^2) encode the left-hand cut from one-particle exchange; the new work supplies their u-channel forms to O(k^6) via Eqs. (9), (11), and (23), and a relativistic form with cut endpoints M_1 and M_2. The key identity is Eq. (20): along the left-hand cut, Im f(k^2) = P(k^2) Im L(k^2), so the amplitude's discontinuity is fixed by the tree-level OPE potential.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that along the left-hand cut the amplitude's discontinuity is exactly the tree-level one-particle-exchange potential's discontinuity, so that no additional left-hand singularities appear when the scattering equation is iterated on the first Riemann sheet.

What would settle it

Solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for a potential that combines the Yukawa one-particle-exchange term with a second, lighter exchanged meson or a two-particle-exchange box diagram; fit the resulting exact amplitude with the generalized ERE and look for systematic residuals near the branch point that exceed the claimed O(k^6) accuracy.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Lattice QCD analyses of near-threshold states such as T_cc can extract phase shifts and pole positions without the distortion caused by the left-hand cut, over a wider energy range than the traditional ERE allows.
  • The expansion is systematically improvable: including O(k^4) and O(k^6) terms improves agreement with exact amplitudes, so it can match increasingly precise experimental or lattice data.
  • The relativistic version extends the framework to systems with unequal masses or higher momenta where the nonrelativistic approximation breaks down.
  • The parameterization automatically captures the amplitude zero that can appear between the left-hand cut and threshold, as demonstrated for the deeply bound t-channel case g=40.
  • Any two-body scattering with a massive exchanged particle—hadronic molecules, nucleon-halo nuclei, baryon-baryon systems—can use the same framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dispersion-integral technique could be adapted to include the next singularity beyond one-particle exchange, such as two-particle exchange (box diagrams), whose cut starts further from threshold but may matter for very high precision.
  • For systems where the exchanged particle can go on shell, (m1-m2)^2 > m_ex^2, the paper explicitly excludes the case; treating it would require a three-body formulation, and the present expansion suggests how the cut endpoints move as the mass difference grows.
  • The order-by-order convergence observed in the u-channel at g=-50 suggests that the O(k^6) truncation is effectively exact near the branch point; one could test whether O(k^8) is needed for extreme mass ratios such as m1 >> m2.
  • The generalized vertices in the paper indicate how to extend the same expansion to P-wave or higher partial waves, where the lhc polynomial gets momentum-dependent factors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the recently proposed effective-range expansion with a left-hand cut (Du-Guo-Wu, PRL 135, 011903) to higher orders in k^2. It derives explicit expressions for the u-channel left-hand-cut functions L_u(k^2) and d_R,u(k^2) up to O(k^6), validates the framework against Lippmann-Schwinger solutions of the Yukawa potential for t-channel couplings g=-20...40 and for a u-channel case at g=-50, and then develops a kinematically relativistic version of the ERE. The central claim is that the generalized ERE is systematically improvable and that the new relativistic form accounts for the one-particle-exchange left-hand cut.

Significance. If correct, the nonrelativistic part of this paper is a useful and credible step forward: the higher-order u-channel expressions are explicit and the numerical tests are genuinely informative, especially the strategy of fitting only Re(k cot delta) while predicting Im(k cot delta) and the reproduction of an amplitude zero at g=40. The u-channel O(k^4) fit at g=-50 visibly improves over O(k^2), supporting the claimed systematic improvement. However, the relativistic extension in Sec. IV contains a concrete algebraic error in the definition of the branch point M1, so the claimed relativistic version is not established as written. The nonrelativistic sections are largely independent of this error and appear sound. After a localized correction, the paper would be a valuable contribution to near-threshold scattering parametrization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eq. (31)] The definition of M1 is algebraically incorrect. Under the stated condition (m1-m2)^2 < mex^2 < (m1+m2)^2, the Kallen function lambda = lambda(m1^2,m2^2,mex^2) is negative. For the Sec. III.B masses (0.8, 0.6, 0.5 GeV), lambda = -0.359 GeV^4. Eq. (31) then gives M1^2 = (1/4)(lambda/mex^2 - 2(m1^2+m2^2)) = -0.859 GeV^2. The actual branch point obtained from the roots in footnote 8 is M1^2 = -lambda/[4(2(m1^2+m2^2)-mex^2)] = 0.0513 GeV^2. Thus M1 has the wrong sign and magnitude. Since M1 enters the logarithms in Eqs. (34) and (36), d_R,u(k^2) does not have the intended left-hand cut and cannot cancel the cut in d(k^2). The contour in Fig. 7 should show endpoints at -0.359 and -0.0513 GeV^2, not a positive endpoint. This is an internal algebraic error in the claimed relativistic extension; the t-channel formula in Eq. (37) appears unaffected.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (20)] The model-independence claim rests on Eq. (20): along the left-hand cut, Im f(k^2) = P(k^2) Im L(k^2), i.e. the discontinuity is exactly the tree-level one-particle-exchange discontinuity. In the numerical tests this holds by construction because the LSE data are generated from the same Yukawa potential. For general amplitudes, additional left-hand strength from multi-particle cuts, inelastic thresholds, or the kinematically excluded region where the exchanged particle can go on shell would violate this assumption. The paper should state this limitation more prominently and, ideally, test the parameterization against an LSE amplitude with a second exchange or an energy-dependent vertex to quantify robustness. Without such a test, the word 'model-independent' in the abstract overreaches what is demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Figs. 2-3] The fits use 'uniform uncertainties' but the actual uncertainty scale and goodness-of-fit measures are not reported. Adding chi^2/dof for each coupling would make the claim of a good description quantitative and would clarify the status of the g=20 case.
  2. [Fig. 5] The shown k^2 range is extremely narrow (roughly -0.052 to -0.0515 GeV^2), which makes the O(k^6) improvement difficult to evaluate. A broader axis would better demonstrate the claimed convergence toward the full Yukawa potential.
  3. [Fig. 6] The legend contains corrupted Unicode/PDF artifacts (e.g. '/uni00000035/uni00000048/...'). These must be replaced by readable labels such as 'O(k^2)' and 'O(k^4)'.
  4. [Eqs. (25)-(27)] The notation [m,n,l] and [m,n] is easy to confuse. Please state explicitly that Eq. (27) is the Taylor-expanded rational-function version of Eq. (25) and specify the ranges and roles of m, n, and l.
  5. [Sec. IV] The neglect of the kinematic singularities sqrt(m1^2+k^2) and sqrt(m2^2+k^2) is asserted to be safe but no quantitative estimate is given. For strongly asymmetric masses these singularities can be closer to threshold, so a numerical statement for the cases considered would strengthen the argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the higher-order lhc functions and relativistic d_R are derived algebraically; numerical checks are self-referential but not definitionally circular.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained: L_u^{(2n)}(k^2) is obtained by expanding the tree-level OPE propagator, d_{R,u}^{(2n)}(k^2) follows from the dispersion integral of that same L, and the relativistic d_R is obtained by a contour integral of L_u. These are algebraic/mathematical steps, not fits. The numerical comparisons fit real parts of kcotδ from LSE data and then compare imaginary parts and amplitudes; because the LSE data is generated from the same Yukawa/OPE potential whose lhc defines L, the agreement is partly a consistency check rather than an independent falsification. This is a limitation of the validation strategy, not a circular reduction of the derivation: the parameters are not fitted to the imaginary parts, and the lhc position is fixed by kinematics. The paper does invoke the authors' earlier framework (Ref. [19]) and Eq. (20), but Eq. (20) is supported by a physical argument in footnote 5 and the N/D formalism, not by an unverified self-citation or uniqueness theorem. The algebraic issue raised concerning Eq. (31) (imaginary radicand for M1 in the stated mass regime) is a correctness/consistency concern rather than a circularity. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework adds no new entities and no new dynamics: the lhc functions L(k^2) and d_R(k^2) are computed from the masses and the tree-level OPE potential. The genuinely load-bearing input is the N/D assumption that the amplitude's left-hand discontinuity is exactly the potential's (Eq. 20), plus the kinematic simplifications in the relativistic section. All numerical validation involves fitting polynomial coefficients to LSE-generated data, so the fitted parameters are free parameters of the tests, not of the framework.

free parameters (3)
  • d0, d1, g~ (t-channel [0,1] fit) = fit to LSE Re[k cot delta] over k^2 in [-0.3, 0.5] GeV^2
    Three parameters of the [0,1] approximant (Eq. 27) fitted to the real part of the LSE phase shifts for each coupling g; also d0,d1,g0,g1 and n1 in the [0,1,1]/[1,1,1] variants.
  • d0, d1, n1, n2, g0 (u-channel [1,2] fit) = fit to the LSE amplitude for g = -50
    Five parameters of the [1,2] approximant used for the u-channel O(k^2) vs O(k^4) comparison (Fig. 6).
  • pseudo-uncertainties = 'uniform uncertainties' over the fit range
    The fits assign uniform uncertainties over the fit range; no statistical model or error propagation is described.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Unitarity: Im(1/f) = -k for S-wave elastic scattering
    Eq. (3), the starting point of the ERE. Standard two-body unitarity.
  • standard math N/D representation of the amplitude with polynomial subtractions
    Eqs. (18)-(19): the amplitude is written as n/d with only the right-hand cut in d and only the left-hand cut in n. Standard dispersion-theory construction (Chew-Mandelstam).
  • domain assumption The amplitude's lhc discontinuity equals the tree-level OPE potential's: Im f = P(k^2) Im L(k^2)
    Eq. (20) and footnote 5: the LSE loop term introduces no additional singularities below threshold on the first Riemann sheet. This is the load-bearing physical input - the entire lhc modeling rests on it.
  • domain assumption Kinematic singularities sqrt(m1^2+k^2) and sqrt(m2^2+k^2) are negligible near threshold
    Sec. IV: 'Neglecting kinematic singularities... whose branch points lie well beyond the near-threshold region.' Asserted without demonstration; load-bearing for the relativistic version.
  • domain assumption m_ex^2 lies between (m1-m2)^2 and (m1+m2)^2
    Sec. IV: the relativistic formulas hold only in this window; on-shell exchange (three-body regime) and heavy exchange (short-range regime) are excluded by flat.
  • domain assumption Remote lhc branch points can be absorbed into polynomials
    Transition from Eq. (8) to Eq. (9) and from Eq. (10) to Eq. (11): far-away roots of the expanded inverse propagator are dropped because they are analytic at low energies and renormalize n(k^2).
  • ad hoc to paper On-shell projection p = p' = sqrt(2 mu E) in the LSE tests
    Sec. III: the LSE is solved with on-shell momenta; a standard test simplification, but a modeling choice particular to this paper's numerical comparison.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14367 in / 22695 out tokens · 231516 ms · 2026-08-03T11:49:50.988109+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A model-independent parameterization of the low-energy scattering amplitude that incorporates the left-hand cut from one-particle exchange, an extension of the conventional effective-range expansion (ERE), was recently proposed and successfully applied to the low-energy $DD^*$ system [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011903 (2025)]. While the original formulation is based on a nonrelativistic approximation and is thus limited to a [1,1] approximant for self-consistency, we extend the framework by explicitly including the higher-order terms up to $\mathcal{O}(k^6)$. We systematically investigate the reliability and robustness of the generalized ERE by incorporating relativistic kinematic effects. In addition, we develop a relativistic version of the ERE that accounts for lhc contributions. These results affirm the generalized ERE as a robust and systematically improvable framework for near-threshold scattering processes, providing both analytical and numerical reliability for applications in two-body scattering problems with a particle exchange.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04989 by Bing Wu, Feng-Kun Guo, Meng-Lin Du, Wen-Jia Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison between the generalized ERE of the [0,1] approximant in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison between the generalized ERE of the [0,1] approximant in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between the generalized ERE of the [0,1,1] and [1,1,1] approximants in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The integration contour in the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite-volume analysis of the $H$-dibaryon including left-hand-cut effects

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite-volume N/D analysis with left-hand cuts applied to lattice data shows a mild but statistically significant effect on H-dibaryon binding energy compared to Lüscher quantization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 25 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. A. Bethe, Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering, Phys. Rev.76, 38 (1949)

    1949

  2. [2]

    Here,t= (p 1 −p 3)2,u= (p 1 −p 4)2,m 1 andm 2 represent the masses of the scattering particles, andm ex is the mass of the exchanged particle

    + 2k2 ,(5) for thetanduchannels, respectively. Here,t= (p 1 −p 3)2,u= (p 1 −p 4)2,m 1 andm 2 represent the masses of the scattering particles, andm ex is the mass of the exchanged particle. Note thatL t(k2) can be formally viewed as a special case ofL u(k2) withm 1 =m 2. In what follows, we therefore focus exclusively on theu-channel case. The nonrelativi...

  3. [3]

    7, respectively

    , M 2 = p −λ(m2 1, m2 2, m2ex) 2mex .(31) These correspond to the black dot, red line, and blue line in Fig. 7, respectively. Applying the 8 The pointsk 2 =−M 2 1 andk 2 =−M 2 2 are the two roots ofm 2 1 +m 2 2 −m 2 ex −2 p (k2 +m 2 1)(k2 +m 2 2)∓2k 2 = 0. 13 residue theorem to the integration contour shown in Fig. 7, we obtain Z C− 1 +C0+C+ 1 +C∞+C2 k′Lu...

  4. [4]

    J. M. Blatt and J. D. Jackson, On the Interpretation of Neutron-Proton Scattering Data by the Schwinger Variational Method, Phys. Rev.76, 18 (1949)

    1949

  5. [5]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the 15 nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1 (2025), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept.1019, 1 (2023), arXiv:2204.08716 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept.873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Baru, X.-K

    V. Baru, X.-K. Dong, M.-L. Du, A. Filin, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, and Q. Wang, Effective range expansion for narrow near-threshold resonances, Phys. Lett. B833, 137290 (2022), arXiv:2110.07484 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys.73, 125201 (2021), arXiv:2108.02673 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41, 65 (2021), arXiv:2101.01021 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Towards a theory of hadron resonances, Phys. Rept.1001, 1 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou, Q. Shou, Q. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and B.-S. Zou, Production of exotic hadrons inppand nuclear collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 55 (2025), arXiv:2411.18257 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    D¨ oring, J

    M. D¨ oring, J. Haidenbauer, M. Mai, and T. Sato, Dynamical coupled-channel models for hadron dy- namics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146, 104213 (2025), arXiv:2505.02745 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Hanhart, Hadronic molecules and multiquark states 10.48550/arXiv.2504.06043 (2025), arXiv:2504.06043 [hep-ph]

    C. Hanhart, Hadronic molecules and multiquark states 10.48550/arXiv.2504.06043 (2025), arXiv:2504.06043 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.06043 2025

  18. [18]

    van Haeringen and L

    H. van Haeringen and L. P. Kok, MODIFIED EFFECTIVE RANGE FUNCTION, Phys. Rev. A26, 1218 (1982)

    1982

  19. [19]

    Zhang, H.-L

    X. Zhang, H.-L. Fu, F.-K. Guo, and H.-W. Hammer, Neutron Scattering off One-Neutron Halo Nuclei in Halo Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. C108, 044304 (2023), arXiv:2308.12815 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    M.-L. Du, A. Filin, V. Baru, X.-K. Dong, E. Epelbaum, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, and Q. Wang, Role of Left-Hand Cut Contributions on Pole Extractions from Lattice Data: Case Study forT cc(3875)+, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 131903 (2023), arXiv:2303.09441 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and B. Wu, Effective-Range Expansion with a Long-Range Force, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011903 (2025), arXiv:2408.09375 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    S. M. Dawid, M. H. E. Islam, and R. A. Brice˜ no, Analytic continuation of the relativistic three-particle scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D108, 034016 (2023), arXiv:2303.04394 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    L. Meng, V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, and A. M. Gasparyan, Solving the left-hand cut prob- lem in lattice QCD:T cc(3875)+ from finite volume energy levels, Phys. Rev. D109, L071506 (2024), arXiv:2312.01930 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and B. Wu, Effective range expansion with the left-hand cut and its application to theT cc(3875), in11th International Workshop on Chiral Dynamics(2025) arXiv:2502.19774 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    R. E. Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes, J. Math. Phys.1, 429 (1960)

    1960

  26. [26]

    R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne,The analytic S-matrix(Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1966)

    1966

  27. [27]

    Jing, X.-H

    H.-J. Jing, X.-H. Cao, and F.-K. Guo, Discontinuity calculus and applications to two-body coupled- channel scattering, Front. Phys.21, 056201 (2026), arXiv:2507.06175 [hep-ph]. 16

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    A. D. Martin and T. D. Spearman,Elementary Particle Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970)

    1970

  29. [29]

    Wu, X.-H

    B. Wu, X.-H. Cao, X.-K. Dong, and F.-K. Guo,σexchange in the one-boson exchange model involving the ground state octet baryons, Phys. Rev. D109, 034026 (2024), arXiv:2312.01013 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    G. F. Chew and S. Mandelstam, Theory of low-energy pion pion interactions, Phys. Rev.119, 467 (1960)

    1960

  31. [31]

    J. A. Oller,A Brief Introduction to Dispersion Relations, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, 2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    G¨ ulmez, U

    D. G¨ ulmez, U. G. Meißner, and J. A. Oller, A chiral covariant approach toρρscattering, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 460 (2017), arXiv:1611.00168 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    M.-L. Du, D. G¨ ulmez, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Wang, Interactions between vector mesons and dynamically generated resonances, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 988 (2018), arXiv:1808.09664 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    J. A. Oller, Coupled-channel approach in hadron-hadron scattering, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.110, 103728 (2020), arXiv:1909.00370 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Shen, Y.-h

    C.-W. Shen, Y.-h. Lin, and U.-G. Meißner,P N cc states in a unitarized coupled-channel approach, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 70 (2023), arXiv:2208.10865 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Nucleon-nucleon scattering from effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B478, 629 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9605002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    Nieves, Renormalization of the one pion exchange NN interaction in presence of derivative contact interactions, Phys

    J. Nieves, Renormalization of the one pion exchange NN interaction in presence of derivative contact interactions, Phys. Lett. B568, 109 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0301080

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  38. [38]

    J. A. Oller and D. R. Entem, The exact discontinuity of a partial wave along the left-hand cut and the exactN/Dmethod in non-relativistic scattering, Annals Phys.411, 167965 (2019), arXiv:1810.12242 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    D. R. Entem, J. Nieves, and J. A. Oller, Contact potentials in presence of a regular finite-range inter- action using dimensional regularization and theN/Dmethod, (2025), arXiv:2506.01461 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025