Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-16T11:46:09.108129Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing
As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 66 of 66 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2601.18061.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T04:16:26.175093Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: pith, observed 2026-08-05T04:18:56.704885Z
Reference resolution
66 of 66 outbound references displayed
- verified exact1
- verified fuzzy57
- unresolved8
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 89705895-d623-41a1-9534-e24224803783 · outbound
This paper cites Clinician-Rated Severity of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Clinician-Rated Severity of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury
Reference 1
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.788739Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0adde6b6-9e29-4ee8-8ce8-dee16e65a5ba · outbound
This paper cites DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.802673Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 1e4bec4c-d8b2-4dc8-90c3-a88efc156446 · outbound
This paper cites DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53330–53342.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53330–53342
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.797026Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 05f8dcd9-93a8-4a4b-b3a1-d00b890fe36c · outbound
This paper cites Truth Is a Lie: Crowd Truth and the Seven Myths of Human Annotation.AI Magazine, 36(1):15–24.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Truth Is a Lie: Crowd Truth and the Seven Myths of Human Annotation.AI Magazine, 36(1):15–24
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.799885Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e9922f6e-93e3-40d3-b196-7528be7f4d82 · outbound
This paper cites Crowd Truth: Harnessing Disagreement in Crowdsourcing a Relation Extraction Gold Standard.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Crowd Truth: Harnessing Disagreement in Crowdsourcing a Relation Extraction Gold Standard
Reference 5
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.777957Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4e6e9d3c-fcdb-419a-8271-a99241af5c35 · outbound
This paper cites Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, and Jared Kaplan.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, and Jared Kaplan
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.775559Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation f2e61751-f922-45ee-9b08-979a55795f70 · outbound
This paper cites Bech.Clinical Psychometrics.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bech.Clinical Psychometrics
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.794378Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0d376012-b765-4928-8354-102339370c21 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 8
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.791417Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 55997058-543a-4706-a361-f2c18a69573d · outbound
This paper cites Consensus report of the apa work group on neuroimaging markers of psychiatric disorders.Am Psychiatr Assoc.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Consensus report of the apa work group on neuroimaging markers of psychiatric disorders.Am Psychiatr Assoc
Reference 9
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.771018Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 940f40b0-d336-49c5-9f1a-d098a446facc · outbound
This paper cites Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.785997Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e77b00b4-e418-4355-9ed3-960f0ca0f5cd · outbound
This paper cites Minton, Abigail Lott, and Jinho D.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Minton, Abigail Lott, and Jinho D
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.780735Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 5c35b276-3251-4a8b-8e82-3ed483f4f883 · outbound
This paper cites Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.692465Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation d5270066-a82f-4590-87f7-3912b967b006 · outbound
This paper cites How people use chatgpt.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing How people use chatgpt
Reference 13
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.641532Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e7ba2d63-d3bf-49e4-ad8a-1ce5804a2c25 · outbound
This paper cites Predicting Depression via Social Media.International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1):128–137.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Predicting Depression via Social Media.International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1):128–137
Reference 14
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.653085Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 28ab72d8-fa4f-4ac1-9997-2d9a277ac1fd · outbound
This paper cites Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.650228Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4e60b9a8-85f4-4021-bc97-fbed1d805f31 · outbound
This paper cites Cicchetti.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Cicchetti
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.661356Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 5f765e66-41fa-4f04-b2a7-08f9b4020713 · outbound
This paper cites Hashimoto.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Hashimoto
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.658470Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 793adfb1-7bd6-409d-8b4c-9fad441839d2 · outbound
This paper cites Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Am Psychiatric Assoc, 21(21):591–643.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Am Psychiatric Assoc, 21(21):591–643
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.735587Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 792b627f-be36-4f30-ae29-b1e0dac0468b · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.282324Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 212b9a9d-18d0-4aca-8802-7d3bbb48e4a0 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.624465Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 598aa3da-0aeb-4af6-9d2c-1e2b4133470f · outbound
This paper cites Can AI relate: Testing large language model response for mental health support.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Can AI relate: Testing large language model response for mental health support
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.633249Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation b3d75980-8685-4f1f-b133-7e00f5295efc · outbound
This paper cites Impact of preference noise on the alignment performance of generative language models.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Impact of preference noise on the alignment performance of generative language models
Reference 22
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.704854Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 942edd00-ba09-4dff-8d65-bcc7949576ee · outbound
This paper cites Blind spots and biases: Exploring the role of annotator cognitive biases in NLP.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Blind spots and biases: Exploring the role of annotator cognitive biases in NLP
Reference 23
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.619087Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 26db7dd9-5be6-4967-b51f-cec76322a12d · outbound
This paper cites Goodman, Lawrence H.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Goodman, Lawrence H
Reference 24
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.639057Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 027577f7-8577-4fcc-9c3a-e8e95fbf536f · outbound
This paper cites Gordon, Michelle S.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Gordon, Michelle S
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.723443Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 38e14316-48b9-4210-b0e8-dcd5e5fc5685 · outbound
This paper cites Risks from language models for automated mental healthcare: Ethics and structure for implementation.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Risks from language models for automated mental healthcare: Ethics and structure for implementation
Reference 26
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.768121Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation f73d4089-4f83-4d33-ab31-a800c9d1bae7 · outbound
This paper cites Human Feedback is not Gold Standard.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
Reference 27
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.689018Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 98fac7e5-2c51-4c5d-a5ba-31b4f65ba2b9 · outbound
This paper cites How LLM counselors violate ethical standards in mental health practice: A practitioner-informed framework.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing How LLM counselors violate ethical standards in mental health practice: A practitioner-informed framework
Reference 28
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.783275Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 33cf71bc-79df-4819-ada5-1bedf766dccc · outbound
This paper cites Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.670029Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 428a34c9-6494-48b3-bc1d-ece9f3437232 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 30
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.701487Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation f48788c3-4db0-498f-addc-942c10481929 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 31
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.683843Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 65cf5188-ab62-47c4-a72b-a9555075c5e4 · outbound
This paper cites Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations.Human Communication Research, 30(3):411–433.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations.Human Communication Research, 30(3):411–433
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.655706Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4f915837-2483-460e-bffe-798b41f4a387 · outbound
This paper cites Kunstman, Aaron Lulla, Monika Drummond Roots, Manu Sharma, Aryan Shrivastava, Nina Vasan, and Colleen Waickman.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Kunstman, Aaron Lulla, Monika Drummond Roots, Manu Sharma, Aryan Shrivastava, Nina Vasan, and Colleen Waickman
Reference 33
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.698419Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 257c5123-393b-483e-abc0-32495fe4c450 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 34
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.636158Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 8d28453c-fef4-4410-a4be-afee8f1fde6f · outbound
This paper cites Hashimoto.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Hashimoto
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.664401Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4731ff42-453d-448c-b60a-aea94481133b · outbound
This paper cites Bunyi, Adam C.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Bunyi, Adam C
Reference 36
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.627248Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation c6897c9c-874c-422a-8468-6affd4168880 · outbound
This paper cites Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study.Journal of Medical Internet Research AI, 3:e52095.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study.Journal of Medical Internet Research AI, 3:e52095
Reference 37
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.681405Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation bfae3754-10ce-452d-9296-72d1725222a7 · outbound
This paper cites A diagnostic meta-analysis of the patient health questionnaire-9 (phq-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.General hospital psychiatry, 37(1):67–75.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A diagnostic meta-analysis of the patient health questionnaire-9 (phq-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression.General hospital psychiatry, 37(1):67–75
Reference 38
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.616428Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation fb3125eb-1f42-49fc-884e-8dea0af2abc7 · outbound
This paper cites McGraw and S.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing McGraw and S
Reference 39
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.678285Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation fc5bb067-0f13-4b44-9a31-6fe731312cf2 · outbound
This paper cites Ong, and Nick Haber.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Ong, and Nick Haber
Reference 40
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.686452Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 4d351919-2dd3-4888-99f0-6bac4c34a7b2 · outbound
This paper cites Moyers, Lauren N.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Moyers, Lauren N
Reference 41
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.647305Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 59346976-8a19-4392-a242-d53521eaf689 · outbound
This paper cites Department of Veterans Affairs.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Department of Veterans Affairs
Reference 42
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.739563Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 7b07b7ee-fa44-4bde-be7d-1099d2d3f527 · outbound
This paper cites NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales
Reference 43
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.720304Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 98ca2986-71ec-40ee-8239-f70dbe2cf385 · outbound
This paper cites Depression.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Depression
Reference 44
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.695200Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation fff6dc70-4901-4d49-8b6a-d778979de163 · outbound
This paper cites Enhancing mental health with artificial intelligence: Current trends and future prospects.Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 3:100099.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Enhancing mental health with artificial intelligence: Current trends and future prospects.Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 3:100099
Reference 45
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.732269Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 00113e04-ee5f-4e6f-ab52-b7563cfa53ba · outbound
This paper cites Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe
Reference 46
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.675515Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation d4b3fcbe-96fb-417e-9b84-6d5f98ee1736 · outbound
This paper cites Inherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:677–694.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Inherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:677–694
Reference 47
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.644545Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 70a2be2c-e2e5-49c6-b176-fb9157ec16cd · outbound
This paper cites Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models
Reference 48
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.672570Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 7ad7fdb4-d134-4f39-a202-dfbe0a93e440 · outbound
This paper cites Posner, D.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Posner, D
Reference 49
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.630361Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation ba9f5582-3a8e-4bf6-ba85-08a669a79415 · outbound
This paper cites Prochaska, Erin A.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Prochaska, Erin A
Reference 50
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.729386Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e65ef78c-0a0e-4f46-a5cf-4677acdf2c8a · outbound
This paper cites Manning, and Chelsea Finn.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Manning, and Chelsea Finn
Reference 51
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.621831Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation b76de69a-9338-4b1e-b092-3f5d05798da4 · outbound
This paper cites Regier, William E.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Regier, William E
Reference 52
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.742505Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 04ef73ce-2388-4902-93be-9bdb52f0d312 · outbound
This paper cites Large language models as mental health resources: Patterns of use in the united states.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Large language models as mental health resources: Patterns of use in the united states
Reference 53
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.711024Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 98307c84-6c72-4814-8ecf-597ffa8652cd · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 54
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.745311Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 50d4e86b-a636-44a0-a658-f91e3e379ab1 · outbound
This paper cites Lin, Adam S.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Lin, Adam S
Reference 55
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.762597Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation db133a62-4faa-41a7-82f7-d4b4065e615f · outbound
This paper cites A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Support.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Support
Reference 56
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.667265Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 752050e8-e4d8-4045-8ed3-b4cbd6a81428 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 57
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.707700Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 54393a32-3d9c-4bc0-aca0-aa974f33a79c · outbound
This paper cites Clinical Practice Guidelines on using artificial intelligence and gadgets for mental health and well-being.Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2):S414–S419.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Clinical Practice Guidelines on using artificial intelligence and gadgets for mental health and well-being.Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 2):S414–S419
Reference 58
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.726521Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 6ab45c2b-2947-46ac-9713-ec7a1e4f1c37 · outbound
This paper cites Pfohl, Heather Cole-Lewis, Darlene Neal, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Schaekermann, Amy Wang, Dev Dash, Jonathan H.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Pfohl, Heather Cole-Lewis, Darlene Neal, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Schaekermann, Amy Wang, Dev Dash, Jonathan H
Reference 59
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.757209Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation f99fe2f6-d891-48eb-958a-008a368e67a1 · outbound
This paper cites Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano
Reference 60
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.717393Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation b4f3a450-f6f0-4bea-ae9a-071ef5658955 · outbound
This paper cites A Practical Guide to Fine-Tuning Language Models with Limited Data.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing A Practical Guide to Fine-Tuning Language Models with Limited Data
Reference 61
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.714235Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation d00a5e5b-2d99-4f8a-987b-5806e4dab1c6 · outbound
This paper cites Lukoff, Keith Nuechterlein, R.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Lukoff, Keith Nuechterlein, R
Reference 62
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.754158Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 0d9e7534-5b1d-422a-a024-16efb4896549 · outbound
This paper cites Wang, Patricia Berglund, Mark Olfson, Harold A.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Wang, Patricia Berglund, Mark Olfson, Harold A
Reference 63
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.759924Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 750f9970-3b04-4c32-a787-ab37a9b73f95 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 64
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.765353Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e29dff42-8874-474f-8a6e-480b1e3c836b · outbound
This paper cites Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E
Reference 65
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.748254Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation 6c6a7069-3c34-4aa4-80cd-17125693c22f · outbound
This paper cites Cold plunges cure psychosis—stop your medication.
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing Cold plunges cure psychosis—stop your medication
Reference 66
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-16T11:47:49.751327Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation cdf42a1e-2a34-4555-8b2b-3949d90c5286 · inbound
Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation cites this paper.
Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T04:18:56.830854Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00.
Observation e1bc1de0-ecac-4a49-97c8-886f6aa76f8b · inbound
Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation cites this paper.
Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing
Reference 35
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T04:16:26.175093Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.