Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Complex nonlinear sigma model

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonlinear sigma models with complexified couplings generically develop complex fixed points, complex scaling dimensions and critical exponents, and spiral renormalization-group flows, with no real-coupling counterparts.

desk verdict A useful, honest catalogue of complex fixed points for NLSM across the ten symmetric spaces, but the global phase diagrams and stability assignments are built from truncated polynomials and should be read as perturbative, not definitive. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.20166 v2 pith:MJWMHUQ7 submitted 2026-01-28 cond-mat.stat-mech hep-thquant-ph

Kazuki Yamamoto , Kohei Kawabata This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph PACS 64.60.Fr05.70.Jk64.60.-i
keywords nonlinearsigmamodelcomplexfixedpointsscalingdimensionsrenormalizationgrouptenfoldsymmetricspacesnonunitaryfieldtheorynon-Hermitiancriticalitylog-periodicoscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that complexifying the coupling constant of nonlinear $\sigma$ models—field theories of matrix fields constrained to symmetric target spaces—creates a generic, systematic landscape of complex critical points. Applying fifth-order perturbative $\beta$ functions, continued from real to complex couplings, to the tenfold symmetric spaces in one, two, and three dimensions, it finds fixed points that appear in complex-conjugate pairs and carry complex scaling dimensions $y_t$ and complex critical exponents $\nu=1/y_t$. The real part of $y_t$ controls stability while the imaginary part makes renormalization-group flows spiral, and the global flow in the complex-coupling plane contains rays whose crossing changes the long-distance fate discontinuously. This matters because open quantum many-body systems naturally have complex effective couplings, so the framework offers a general description of nonunitary critical phenomena rather than a collection of tuned examples. The sympathetic reading is that complex criticality is generic in this setting, with observable signatures such as log-periodic oscillations in correlation lengths.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the perturbative $\beta$ function $\beta(t)=dt/dl=(2-d)t+(N-2)t^2+\cdots$, truncated at $O(t^5)$, taken from real-coupling calculations and then treated as a polynomial in complex $t$. Fixed points are the zeros of this polynomial; linearizing around a zero gives the complex scaling dimension $y_t=\beta'(t_*)$, whose real part classifies stability and whose imaginary part produces the spiral rotation. The same polynomial's leading term at large $|t|$ yields the $n-1$ asymptotic rays $R_m$ that act as separatrices, and in two dimensions the leading quadratic term, rewritten through inversion $u=1/t$, generates circular flow lines through the origin. This single polynomial therefore carries every claim in the paper: fixed-point enumeration, local critical data, and the global phase structure.

What would settle it

A nonperturbative computation of the two-dimensional O(N) $\sigma$ model with complex coupling, such as a large-$N$ calculation or a controlled lattice simulation, could decide whether generic trajectories return to weak coupling or run to strong coupling, and whether $\mathrm{Im}\,\nu$ for $N=3$ lies near the exact value about 0.816 or near the perturbative value about 0.262; either comparison would settle whether the complex fixed points and asymptotic rays of this paper are physical or truncation artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that complex fixed points emerge generically as complex-conjugate pairs in the analytically continued renormalization-group flow of nonlinear $\sigma$ models, and that the associated universal data are genuinely complex. At each fixed point $t_*$, the scaling dimension $y_t=\beta'(t_*)$ governs the local flow: $\mathrm{Re}\,y_t>0$ gives an unstable spiral, $\mathrm{Re}\,y_t<0$ a stable spiral, and $\mathrm{Im}\,y_t$ fixes the angular velocity and direction of rotation. Because the correlation-length exponent is $\nu=1/y_t$, approaching such a critical point produces a divergence proportional to $|t-t_c|^{-\mathrm{Re}\,\nu}$ modulated by oscillations such as $\cos[(\mathrm{Im}\,\nu)\log|t-t_c|]$. The paper works out this structure for all tenfold symmetric target spaces in one, two, and three dimensions, and maps global phase diagrams in which asymptotic rays act as separatrices separating different long-distance fates, so both continuous and discontinuous transitions appear. In two dimensions it benchmarks the perturbative $\nu$ against an exact Coulomb-gas result for the O(N) model, finding matching real parts and the same order of magnitude but a substantial difference in the imaginary parts.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis assumes that the fifth-order perturbative beta functions, computed for real couplings, remain the true renormalization-group flow after the coupling is continued into the complex plane—an assumption the paper itself flags as vulnerable because nonperturbative effects invisible at any finite order could reconnect trajectories and alter the infrared fate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Complex critical points with complex exponents are generic rather than tuned: they appear for every tenfold symmetric target space in at least one dimension.
  • Near a complex fixed point, the correlation length diverges as $|t-t_c|^{-\nu}$ with complex $\nu$, so log-periodic oscillations are superimposed on the power-law divergence.
  • The asymptotic rays in the complex-coupling plane act as separatrices, so crossing a ray changes the long-distance endpoint discontinuously; this is the paper's renormalization-group-level description of a first-order transition.
  • In two dimensions, the beta function's missing linear term makes the flow near $t=0$ circular, so trajectories can leave weak coupling and return to it, and the same structure appears in non-Hermitian Kondo models.
  • Stable complex fixed points in one dimension attract generic trajectories, so complexification replaces the real-axis runaway to $\pm\infty$ by spiral attraction to a complex fixed point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims, the log-periodic modulation of correlation lengths suggests a concrete observable: in dissipative or monitored systems with complex effective couplings, scaling data near the transition should oscillate in $\log|t-t_c|$ rather than follow a pure power law.
  • The paper does not claim its tenfold survey is complete; a natural extension is to compile the complex scaling dimensions and exponents for each symmetry class as a nonunitary analogue of the standard universality-class table, and then check which complex fixed points survive a nonperturbative resummation.
  • If nonperturbative saddles reconnect trajectories as the paper allows, the discontinuous transitions encoded in the asymptotic rays may be truncation artifacts; a large-$N$ computation of the same beta function would test which separatrices are genuine.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear sigma models with complexified couplings by analytically continuing finite-order perturbative beta functions for the tenfold symmetric spaces. It reports the generic emergence of complex-conjugate fixed points with complex scaling dimensions and spiral renormalization-group flows, and it presents global phase diagrams in one, two, and three dimensions with both continuous and discontinuous transitions. The two-dimensional O(N) case is compared with an exact Coulomb-gas result [60]. The main claims are that complex fixed points are generic and that the associated universal data become genuinely complex.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely topic and offers a systematic survey across all tenfold symmetry classes, with no free parameters in the fixed-point calculations. The exact 2D O(N) benchmark is a valuable external check. If the finite-order statements could be shown to survive nonperturbative corrections, the classification would be a useful reference for complexified field theory and related non-Hermitian/open-system models. However, the manuscript's own checks reveal order-dependent stability assignments and a qualitative discrepancy with the exact infrared fate, so the claims in their current unqualified form exceed what the truncated polynomials establish.

major comments (4)
  1. [Secs. II.C and II.E; abstract and Sec. I] The global phase-diagram claims in the abstract and Sec. I ('clarify global phase diagrams', 'identify continuous and discontinuous transitions') are not supported by the finite-order analysis. The asymptotic-ray and separatrix picture of Sec. II.C is derived from O(t^n) polynomial beta functions, and Sec. II.E explicitly reports that the exact 2D O(N) result predicts flow to strong coupling, opposite to the generic weak-coupling return obtained from the same polynomials; Sec. II.C also concedes that nonperturbative terms may reconnect trajectories and change the basin structure. Because every global statement in Secs. II.D-III.I inherits this uncertainty, the paper should reframe these statements as properties of the truncated polynomial flows or supply nonperturbative control (e.g. the large-N method mentioned in Sec. II.E).
  2. [Sec. III.F and Fig. 7] Stability assignments are order-dependent in a way that affects the central classification. In Sec. III.F and Fig. 7, the O(2N)/U(N) model with N=2 and d=2 has an unstable complex pair at O(t^4) that becomes stable at O(t^5), as the caption states. Since the paper identifies critical complex fixed points by the sign of Re y_t (Sec. II.B) and uses this to conclude 'absence of criticality' (Sec. II.D) or 'critical points unique to complexified field theory' (Sec. II.E), this example shows that at least some stability-based classifications are truncation artifacts. The authors should either identify which stability assignments are invariant across available orders or explicitly qualify all such assignments.
  3. [Sec. II.E, Table I] The quantitative comparison with the exact O(N) result undercuts the word 'genuinely complex universal data' as a present-tense claim. For N=3, Table I gives exact Im nu = 0.816 versus O(t^5) Im nu = 0.262 (a factor of roughly 3) and exact Re nu = 0.25 versus 0.063; the text's 'same order of magnitude' refers to the O(t^4) value (0.25 +/- 0.224i), not to the O(t^5) values in Table I. Because the central claim is about universal critical exponents, the authors need error estimates, resummations, or a clear statement that only the qualitative existence of a complex pair is established by the benchmark.
  4. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (11)] The identification of asymptotic rays in Eq. (11) as 'lines of discontinuous phase transitions' is not tied to any physical observable. The flow is in the complex-coupling plane, and no free energy or partition function is computed; the discontinuity is a property of the separatrices of a truncated polynomial vector field. Please define the physical parameter path and observable that would be discontinuous, or remove the phrase 'discontinuous phase transition' from the abstract and Sec. II.E.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (12)] The typesetting involving i * pi^{-1} * cosh^{-1}(N/2) is ambiguous; please ensure the formula is consistent with the numerical values in Table I and state why N=2 is excluded, since cosh^{-1}(1)=0 would make the expression singular.
  2. [Sec. II.C, after Eq. (11)] The phrase 'm-1 asymptotic rays' appears to be a typo for 'n-1 asymptotic rays', consistent with the index range m=0,...,n-2 in Eq. (11).
  3. [Fig. 1] Panels in the first and second columns of Fig. 1 use the rescaled coupling x=(N-2)t, but the axis labels show t; please make the rescaling explicit in the axis labels or captions.
  4. [Fig. 7] Fig. 7 includes scaling dimensions such as 1212167(890 +/- 33267i) for O(2N)/U(N); the very large values indicate perturbative artifacts and deserve a remark, especially because the corresponding fixed points are far outside the plotted range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: the beta functions are independent literature inputs, complex fixed points are their polynomial roots, and the exact O(N) comparison is an external benchmark; the only self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular in the sense prohibited by the rubric. All beta functions (Eqs. (2) and (16)-(28)) are taken from earlier independent real-coupling calculations [68,69,76]; no parameter is fitted to the outputs that are later called predictions. Fixed points are defined as zeros beta(t)=0, scaling dimensions as y_t=beta'(t*), and nu=1/y_t; these are standard definitions rather than fitted quantities. The O(t^4) value nu=0.25 +/- 0.224i in Eq. (13) follows algebraically from the cited polynomial and is checked against, not derived from, the independent Coulomb-gas result [60]; Table I's discrepancies (e.g., perturbative Im nu smaller than exact by roughly a factor of three) are an external benchmark, not a circular validation. The generic appearance of complex-conjugate fixed-point pairs is a consequence of the beta functions having real polynomial coefficients, but the paper's substantive claims (spiral flows, asymptotic rays, and global phase structure) depend on the full complexified flow, not merely on that algebraic fact. The only self-citation, Ref. [65] (Shimizu and Kawabata) in the Potts-model context, is one of six supporting references and is not load-bearing for any computed result. The manuscript itself flags the genuine limitations: Sec. II.E concedes that nonperturbative contributions invisible at finite order could reconnect trajectories and change the IR fate, contradicting the perturbative return-to-weak-coupling picture of Ref. [60], and Sec. III.F shows that the stability of the O(2N)/U(N) complex pair reverses from unstable at O(t^4) to stable at O(t^5). These are truncation/under-determination concerns about the global flow claims, not circularity, and they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. Its results rest entirely on (1) known perturbative beta functions, (2) the assumption that analytic continuation in the coupling defines a valid nonunitary RG flow, and (3) the assumption that truncated polynomials faithfully represent global flow topology. These are background assumptions rather than invented physics.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The perturbative beta functions up to fifth order for the tenfold symmetric spaces, taken from Refs. [68,69], are correct and determine the RG flow.
    The paper does not derive these beta functions; all subsequent fixed points and flows are roots and trajectories of these polynomials. Errors or omissions in these coefficients would propagate directly into the results.
  • ad hoc to paper Analytic continuation of the real-coupling beta function to complex t defines the RG flow of the complexified nonunitary nonlinear sigma model.
    The beta functions were computed for real coupling. The paper assumes without derivation that the same polynomial, evaluated at complex t, correctly describes the nonunitary field theory. This is the central modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The correlation length exponent nu = 1/y_t remains valid for complex y_t and gives physical scaling behavior.
    Used in Sec. II.B, Eq. (8), to interpret complex y_t as log-periodic oscillations in |t-t_c|^{-nu}. This assumes the standard scaling relation survives analytic continuation.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation of the beta function at finite order captures the global flow structure, including asymptotic rays and infrared fates, in the complex plane.
    Used in Sec. II.C and II.E for the global phase diagrams. The paper itself notes that nonperturbative effects may reconnect trajectories and alter the basin structure, so this is a fragile assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complex nonlinear sigma model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJWMHUQ7

@misc{pith2026260120166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complex nonlinear sigma model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJWMHUQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.20166}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by the recent interest in the criticality of open quantum many-body systems, we study nonlinear sigma models with complexified couplings as a general framework for nonunitary field theory. Applying the perturbative renormalization-group analysis to the tenfold symmetric spaces, we demonstrate that fixed points with complex scaling dimensions and critical exponents arise generically, without counterparts in conventional nonlinear sigma models with real couplings. We further clarify the global phase diagrams in the complex-coupling plane and identify both continuous and discontinuous phase transitions. Our work thus identifies nonlinear sigma models as a representative setting for studying complex critical points and elucidates universal aspects of critical phenomena in complexified field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.20166 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the O ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the U ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the O (2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Perturbative renormalization-group flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complex Conformal Manifolds

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Complexified exactly-marginal couplings produce solvable complex CFTs, with the Ising defect verified numerically in non-Hermitian chains.

  2. Asymptotic freedom, lost: Complex conformal field theory in the two-dimensional $O(N>2)$ nonlinear sigma model and its realization in Heisenberg spin chains

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 2D O(N>2) nonlinear sigma model has complex-conjugate nontrivial fixed points, realized in non-Hermitian Heisenberg spin chains, forming a complex CFT universality class.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [60]

    Haldar, O

    A. Haldar, O. Tavakol, H. Ma, and T. Scaffidi, Hidden Critical Points in the Two-Dimensional O(n>2) Model: Exact Numerical Study of a Complex Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 131601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(Westview Press, Boulder, 1992)

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(Westview Press, Boulder, 1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [2]

    ,𝑁=1 (e) (f) (g) 2D (i) (j) (k) 3D (d)𝑡

    This observation further underscores the ubiquity of the renormalization-group structures exhibited in Fig. 1 for complexified field theory. F. Three dimensions In three dimensions, unstable fixed points appear even in the real-coupling regime [Figs. 1 (k)-(o)]. ForN= 3 atO(t 5) [Fig. 1 (o)], the renormalization-group flow ap- proaches weak couplingt= 0 f...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng- land, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng- land, 1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [4]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [5]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys. 37, 4986 (1996); A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal- superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    work page 1996

  7. [6]

    A. M. Polyakov, Interaction of goldstone particles in two dimensions. Applications to ferromagnets and massive Yang-Mills fields, Phys. Lett. B59, 79 (1975)

    work page 1975

  8. [7]

    Br´ ezin and J

    E. Br´ ezin and J. Zinn-Justin, Renormalization of the NonlinearσModel in 2 +ϵDimensions—Application to the Heisenberg Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 691 (1976); Spontaneous breakdown of continuous symme- tries near two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B14, 3110 (1976)

    work page 1976

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    Wegner, The mobility edge problem: Continuous sym- metry and a conjecture, Z

    F. Wegner, The mobility edge problem: Continuous sym- metry and a conjecture, Z. Physik B35, 207 (1979); L. Sch¨ afer and F. Wegner, Disordered system withnor- bitals per site: Lagrange formulation, hyperbolic symme- try, and goldstone modes, Z. Physik B38, 113 (1980)

    1979

  2. [9]

    L. P. Gor’kov, A. I. Larkin, and D. E. Khmel’nitskii, Par- ticle conductivity in a two-dimensional random potential, JETP Lett.30, 228 (1979)

    1979

  3. [10]

    Hikami, A

    S. Hikami, A. I. Larkin, and Y. Nagaoka, Spin-Orbit In- teraction and Magnetoresistance in the Two Dimensional Random System, Prog. Theor. Phys.63, 707 (1980)

    1980

  4. [11]

    K. B. Efetov, A. I. Larkin, and D. E. Khmel’nitzkii, In- teraction of diffusion modes in the theory of localization, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.52, 568 (1980)

    1980

  5. [12]

    B. L. Altshuler, D. Khmel’nitzkii, A. I. Larkin, and P. A. 12 (a) 1D 𝑡!,𝑁=1 (d) 2D (g) 3D (b)𝑡!,𝑁=2 𝑡!,𝑁=1(e)𝑡!,𝑁=2 𝑡!,𝑁=1(h)𝑡!,𝑁=2 (c)𝑡!,𝑁=3 (f)𝑡!,𝑁=3 (i)𝑡!,𝑁=3 -1.0-0.50.00.51.0-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -1.0-0.50.00.51.0-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -1.0-0.50.00.51.0-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1....

    1980

  6. [13]

    F. J. Dyson, The Dynamics of a Disordered Linear Chain, Phys. Rev.92, 1331 (1953)

    1953

  7. [14]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  8. [15]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 673 (1979)

    1979

  9. [16]

    P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.57, 287 (1985)

    1985

  10. [17]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  11. [18]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  12. [19]

    Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf

    A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  13. [20]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  14. [21]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- (a) 1D 𝑡!,𝑁=1 (d) 2D (g) 3D (b)𝑡!,𝑁=2 𝑡!,𝑁=1(e)𝑡!,𝑁=2 𝑡!,𝑁=1(h)𝑡!,𝑁=2 (c)𝑡!,𝑁=3 (f)𝑡!,𝑁=3 (i)𝑡!,𝑁=3 -2-1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 -2-1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 -2-1 0 1 2-2 -1 0 1 2 -2...

    2016

  15. [22]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: Identification with the O(3) nonlinear sigma model, Phys. Lett. A93, 464 (1983); Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Anti- ferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimens...

    1983

  16. [23]

    Affleck, Quantum spin chains and the Haldane gap, J

    I. Affleck, Quantum spin chains and the Haldane gap, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter1, 3047 (1989)

    1989

  17. [24]

    Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many- Body Systems(Springer, Cham, 2020)

    H. Tasaki,Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many- Body Systems(Springer, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteract- ing fermions, Phys. Rev. B106, 134206 (2022); C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced e...

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Q. Yang, Y. Zuo, and D. E. Liu, Keldysh nonlinear sigma model for a free-fermion gas under continuous measure- ments, Phys. Rev. Research5, 033174 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear Sigma Models for Monitored Dynamics of Free 13 Fermions, Phys. Rev. X13, 041045 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    Poboiko, P

    I. Poboiko, P. P¨ opperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Theory of Free Fermions under Random Projective Mea- surements, Phys. Rev. X13, 041046 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves inPT-symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035002 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  24. [31]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians HavingPTSymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  25. [32]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians, Rep. Prog. Phys.70, 947 (2007)

    2007

  26. [33]

    C. N. Yang and T. D. Lee, Statistical Theory of Equa- tions of State and Phase Transitions. I. Theory of Con- densation, Phys. Rev.87, 404 (1952); T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Statistical Theory of Equations of State and Phase Transitions. II. Lattice Gas and Ising Model, Phys. R...

    1952

  27. [34]

    M. E. Fisher, Yang-Lee Edge Singularity andϕ 3 Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1610 (1978)

    1978

  28. [35]

    Cardy, The Yang-Lee Edge Singularity and Related Problems, arXiv:2305.13288

    J. Cardy, The Yang-Lee Edge Singularity and Related Problems, arXiv:2305.13288

    arXiv

  29. [36]

    J. L. Cardy, Conformal Invariance and the Yang-Lee Edge Singularity in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1354 (1985)

    1985

  30. [37]

    Bianchini, O

    D. Bianchini, O. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, E. Levi, and F. Ravanini, Entanglement entropy of non-unitary conformal field theory, J. Phys. A48, 04FT01 (2015)

    2015

  31. [38]

    Couvreur, J

    R. Couvreur, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Entan- glement in Nonunitary Quantum Critical Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 040601 (2017)

    2017

  32. [39]

    Chang, J.-S

    P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Entangle- ment spectrum and entropy in topological non-Hermitian systems and nonunitary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033069 (2020)

    2020

  33. [40]

    C. H. Lee, Exceptional Bound States and Negative Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010402 (2022)

    2022

  34. [41]

    Tu, Y.-C

    Y.-T. Tu, Y.-C. Tzeng, and P.-Y. Chang, R´ enyi entropies and negative central charges in non-Hermitian quantum systems, SciPost Phys.12, 194 (2022)

    2022

  35. [42]

    Ryu and J

    S. Ryu and J. Yoon, Unitarity of Symplectic Fermions in αVacua with Negative Central Charge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241602 (2023)

    2023

  36. [43]

    Hsieh and P.-Y

    C.-T. Hsieh and P.-Y. Chang, Relating non-Hermitian and Hermitian quantum systems at criticality, SciPost Phys. Core6, 062 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    Fossati, F

    M. Fossati, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Symmetry-resolved entanglement in critical non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B107, 205153 (2023)

    2023

  38. [45]

    Rottoli, M

    F. Rottoli, M. Fossati, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement Hamiltonian in the non-Hermitian SSH model, J. Stat. Mech.2024, 063102 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    Xue and C

    W.-T. Xue and C. H. Lee, Topologically Protected Neg- ative Entanglement, Adv. Sci.2025, e13868 (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    Li, K.-H

    H.-H. Li, K.-H. Chou, X. Wen, and P.-Y. Chang, Impurity-induced nonunitary criticality, Phys. Rev. B 113, 035130 (2026)

    2026

  41. [48]

    R. Fan, J. Dong, and A. Vishwanath, Simulating the non-unitary Yang-Lee conformal field theory on the fuzzy sphere, arXiv:2505.06342

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    E. A. Cruz, I. R. Klebanov, G. Tarnopolsky, and Y. Xin, Yang-Lee Quantum Criticality in Various Dimensions, arXiv:2505.06369

  43. [50]

    Chou, X.-J

    K.-H. Chou, X.-J. Yu, and P.-Y. Chang, PT symmetry- enriched non-unitary criticality, arXiv:2509.09587

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Conformality lost, Phys. Rev. D80, 125005 (2009)

    2009

  45. [52]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: Sym- metries and Dualities, Phys. Rev. X7, 031051 (2017)

    2017

  46. [53]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, Walking, weak first-order transitions, and complex CFTs, J. High Energ. Phys.2018(10), 108; Walking, Weak first-order tran- sitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ>4, SciPost Phys.5, 050 (2018)

    2018

  47. [54]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Iossa, and M. Serone, Conformality Loss, Walking, and 4D Complex Conformal Field Theories at Weak Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 051602 (2020)

    2020

  48. [55]

    A. F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, D. Mateos, and J. G. Subils, Holographic Complex Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 161601 (2020)

    2020

  49. [56]

    Giombi, R

    S. Giombi, R. Huang, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and G. Tarnopolsky,O(N) model in 4< d <6: Instantons and complex CFTs, Phys. Rev. D101, 045013 (2020)

    2020

  50. [57]

    Gorbenko and B

    V. Gorbenko and B. Zan, Two-dimensionalO(n) models and logarithmic CFTs, J. High Energ. Phys.2020(10), 99

    2020

  51. [58]

    Nahum, Fixed point annihilation for a spin in a fluc- tuating field, Phys

    A. Nahum, Fixed point annihilation for a spin in a fluc- tuating field, Phys. Rev. B106, L081109 (2022)

    2022

  52. [59]

    S. Han, D. J. Schultz, and Y. B. Kim, Complex fixed points of the non-Hermitian Kondo model in a Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B107, 235153 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Yang and T

    C. Yang and T. Scaffidi, Asymptotic freedom, lost: Complex conformal field theory in the two-dimensional O(N >2) nonlinear sigma model and its realization in the spin-1 Heisenberg chain, arXiv:2601.02459

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    M. E. Fisher, The Nature of Critical Points, inLectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol. VII C: Statistical Physics, Weak Interactions, Field Theory, edited by W. E. Brittin (University of Colorado Press, Boulder, 1965) pp. 1–159

    1965

  55. [63]

    Ma and Y.-C

    H. Ma and Y.-C. He, Shadow of complex fixed point: Approximate conformality ofQ >4 Potts model, Phys. Rev. B99, 195130 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    J. L. Jacobsen and K. J. Wiese, Lattice Realization of Complex Conformal Field Theories: Two-Dimensional Potts Model withQ >4 States, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 077101 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Y. Tang, H. Ma, Q. Tang, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Reclaiming the Lost Conformality in a Non-Hermitian Quantum 5-State Potts Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 076504 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Shimizu and K

    H. Shimizu and K. Kawabata, Complex entanglement en- tropy for complex conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. B 112, 085112 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    V. V. Linden, B. D. Vos, K. Vervoort, F. Verstraete, and A. Ueda, Spiral renormalization group flow and univer- sal entanglement spectrum of the non-Hermitian 5-state Potts model, arXiv:2507.14732. 14

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Y. Tang, Q. Liu, Q. Tang, and W. Zhu, Boundary crit- icality of complex conformal field theory: A case study in the non-Hermitian 5-state Potts model, SciPost Phys. 19, 164 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Hikami, Three-loopβ-functions of non-linearσmodels on symmetric spaces, Phys

    S. Hikami, Three-loopβ-functions of non-linearσmodels on symmetric spaces, Phys. Lett. B98, 208 (1981)

    1981

  62. [70]

    Wegner, Four-loop-orderβ-function of nonlinearσ- models in symmetric spaces, Nucl

    F. Wegner, Four-loop-orderβ-function of nonlinearσ- models in symmetric spaces, Nucl. Phys. B316, 663 (1989)

    1989

  63. [71]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos(Chap- man and Hall/CRC, New York, 2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Meurice and H

    Y. Meurice and H. Zou, Complex renormalization group flows for 2D nonlinearO(N) sigma models, Phys. Rev. D83, 056009 (2011)

    2011

  65. [73]

    J. A. S. Louren¸ co, R. L. Eneias, and R. G. Pereira, Kondo effect in aPT-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B98, 085126 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Nakagawa, N

    M. Nakagawa, N. Kawakami, and M. Ueda, Non- Hermitian Kondo Effect in Ultracold Alkaline-Earth Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203001 (2018)

    2018

  67. [75]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. H. Lee, and J. Wu, Integrable Kondo prob- lems, J. High Energy Phys.2021(4), 268

    2021

  68. [76]

    Nozi` eres and A

    P. Nozi` eres and A. Blandin, Kondo effect in real metals, J. Phys. France41, 193 (1980)

    1980

  69. [77]

    T. Wang, Z. Pan, K. Slevin, and T. Ohtsuki, Critical be- havior of the Anderson transition in higher-dimensional Bogoliubov–de Gennes symmetry classes, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144208 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group. I. Classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971); Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a...

    1971

  71. [79]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C6, 1181 (1973); J. M. Kosterlitz, The critical properties of the two-dimensional XY model, J. Phys. C 7, 1046 (1974)

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.