Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

This paper claims that non-Gaussian inflationary perturbations acquire Wigner-negative interference fringes on super-Hubble scales, with negativity growing as a² in ultra-slow-roll backgrounds, implying quantum effects can persist at late t

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 06:43 UTC pith:QOEGCIQQ

load-bearing objection Serious non-perturbative calculation of the Goldstone-mode Wigner function in constant-roll inflation, but the abstract overclaims: the negativity is computed for χ, not for curvature perturbations, and part of it is a coordinate artifact. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.22219 v3 pith:QOEGCIQQ submitted 2026-01-29 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

When inflationary perturbations refuse to classicalise: the role of non-Gaussianity in Wigner negativity

Aurora Ireland , Vincent Vennin This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords Wigner functionWigner negativityinflationary perturbationsquantum-to-classical transitionultra-slow-roll inflationnon-Gaussianityeffective field theory of inflationseparate universe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Cosmological perturbations are usually treated as classical stochastic fields after inflation, but this paper asks whether genuine quantum interferences survive. Using the effective field theory of inflation, the authors compute the Wigner function of the long-wavelength Goldstone mode beyond linear order, where non-Gaussianities make perturbative methods inadequate. They find that the Wigner function develops oscillatory fringes and negative regions on super-Hubble scales, and in ultra-slow-roll backgrounds the negativity volume grows as a². If correct, this shows that squeezing, the standard argument for classicalisation, is not sufficient, and that quantum signatures might be observable in cosmological data.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that non-Gaussianity alone forces Wigner negativity in the super-Hubble state of inflationary perturbations. Starting from a non-perturbative wavefunction ansatz—a difference of two Gaussian wavepackets enforcing a boundary at χ0→∞—the authors construct the Wigner function of the Goldstone mode χ0 in constant-roll backgrounds. The resulting distribution has a boomerang-shaped core with cascades of interference fringes at large negative momenta, and its negativity volume grows monotonically with the scale factor, initially as a² in the ultra-slow-roll case. The authors read this as evidence that quantum interferences remain significant at late times and that t

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wigner function of the homogeneous Goldstone mode χ0, with Wigner negativity (the phase-space volume where the Wigner function is negative) used as a marker of quantum interference. The computation rests on a non-linear canonical transformation Y = (2κ/ϵ2H)(e^{ϵ2Hχ0/2}−1), which maps the Gaussian state of Y into a non-Gaussian state of χ0; the wavefunction is a superposition of an original and a reflected Gaussian (method of images) satisfying a Dirichlet boundary condition. The Wigner function is then recast as an infinite series of Bessel functions (Eq. 4.7), where the modified Bessel function of the second kind with complex index carries the oscillatory, sign-cha

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Wigner negativity computed for the Goldstone field χ survives the non-linear map to the curvature perturbation R; the paper studies χ's quantum state (stated in §2.2), and Wigner negativity is not invariant under non-linear canonical transformations, so if R's Wigner function is positive the headline claim about curvature perturbations fails.

What would settle it

Compute the Wigner function of the curvature perturbation R directly, using the non-linear relation R = Σ_{n=1}^∞ (−1)^n/n! (Hχ^n)^{(n−1)} from Eq. (2.15). If that Wigner function is non-negative on super-Hubble scales, the paper's conclusion that curvature perturbations retain quantum interference is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In non-slow-roll backgrounds with sizeable curvature perturbations, the super-Hubble state cannot be represented by a positive classical phase-space distribution, so the standard stochastic description of inflationary fluctuations is insufficient.
  • Squeezing, or the growth/decay hierarchy of linear perturbation modes, does not by itself imply classicality; classicality criteria must be invariant under canonical transformations.
  • The negativity volume grows monotonically with time (initially as a² in ultra-slow roll), meaning quantum interference becomes more prominent on super-Hubble scales rather than decaying away.
  • Because negative regions extend close to the origin of phase space, observables probing large-density objects such as primordial black holes or ultra-compact halos may be sensitive to this quantum interference.
  • Slow-roll and ultra-slow-roll backgrounds behave qualitatively differently at the non-linear level, even though their linear perturbation spectra coincide through a known duality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the paper computes the Wigner function of the Goldstone field χ, not of the curvature perturbation R itself; §2.2 states this explicitly. Since Wigner negativity is not invariant under non-linear canonical transformations, whether R's Wigner function is also negative is an open step that the paper does not perform.
  • Editorial: the a² growth law is an empirical fit to early-time numerical data; extrapolating it to late times assumes the trend continues beyond the range where numerics are reliable.
  • Editorial: the analysis neglects decoherence. In an open-system treatment, environmental entanglement could erase the fringes; the natural next test is whether the predicted negativity survives coupling to unobserved modes.
  • Editorial: the mechanism suggests a general pattern—any non-linear canonical transformation applied to a Gaussian state generates Wigner negativity—so similar fringes are likely in other non-slow-roll or non-linear inflation models, not just the constant-roll case studied here.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a non-perturbative, separate-universe-inspired framework to compute the Wigner function of a long-wavelength homogeneous mode of the Goldstone field χ in the EFT of inflation, specializing to constant-roll backgrounds (slow roll and ultra-slow roll). After a compactifying canonical transformation, the authors impose a Dirichlet boundary condition and use a two-Gaussian method-of-images ansatz for the wavefunction. They compute the Wigner function W(χ0,π0), find pronounced interference fringes and negative regions, and report that the Wigner negativity grows approximately as e^{2ΔN⋆} in ultra-slow-roll backgrounds. They argue that this demonstrates that non-Gaussianity necessarily produces Wigner negativity and that squeezing alone does not guarantee classicality.

Significance. If the result were established for the curvature perturbation R, it would constitute a significant challenge to the standard quantum-to-classical transition story for inflationary perturbations. The paper's technical framework is careful and self-consistent: the linear-theory limit in §3.4 correctly recovers separate-universe results, and the analytical series representation in Eq. (4.6) is a useful tool for studying the Wigner function. However, the central physical claim is currently formulated for the Goldstone field χ, not for R, and Wigner negativity is not invariant under the non-linear transformation relating them. The abstract also overstates the a^2 growth law, which is only an early-time numerical fit. These issues are load-bearing and prevent the paper, in its present form, from supporting its headline conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 and §3.3] The Wigner function computed in Eq. (3.33) is W(χ0,π0), the Wigner function of the Goldstone field, not of the curvature perturbation R. The paper explicitly states after Eq. (2.15) that 'we will study its quantum state rather than the one of R'. However, the abstract claims to compute 'the Wigner function of curvature perturbations'. The relation (2.15) is non-linear, and Wigner negativity is not invariant under non-linear canonical transformations; indeed §4.1 identifies the non-linear map (3.18) as a separate source of negativity. Since cosmological observables are naturally formulated in terms of R, the central claim requires the Wigner function of R, or a proof that negativity survives the inverse of (2.15). Without this, the headline conclusion is not supported.
  2. [§4.2 and Abstract] The abstract states that 'its negativity grows as a^2 in ultra-slow-roll backgrounds'. In §4.2, the growth law is introduced as an empirical fit N(ΔN⋆)=c1 e^{2ΔN⋆}+c2 (Eq. (4.9)), with c1,c2 determined numerically, and the text immediately adds 'Whether this behaviour persists to later times remains unclear'. Thus the a^2 growth is an early-time, benchmark-dependent fit, not a demonstrated asymptotic result. The abstract should be qualified accordingly.
  3. [§3.1 and §3.2] The non-Gaussian state is constructed by imposing the Dirichlet boundary condition (3.10) and the two-Gaussian method-of-images ansatz (3.12). The Gaussian state used for matching (2.27) does not satisfy (3.10); the ansatz is an additional input introduced at the matching time. Because the Hamiltonian in Y (3.6) is quadratic, a single Gaussian would remain Gaussian; the non-Gaussianity—and hence the Wigner negativity via Hudson's theorem—is at least partly put in by hand. The paper should justify that this boundary condition is the one inherited from the original χ variable under the transformation (3.5)-(3.7), and discuss the sensitivity to other self-adjoint boundary conditions. As it stands, the role of 'primordial non-Gaussianities' in generating the negativity is not cleanly separated from the choice of boundary condition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §2.2] The abstract promises a Wigner function for curvature perturbations, while §2.2 explicitly chooses to study the Goldstone field χ. Please align the language throughout.
  2. [§1] Duplicate phrase: 'on super-Hubble scales the the Heisenberg-picture' should be 'the Heisenberg-picture'.
  3. [§4.2 / Fig. 6 caption] The caption says 'Wigner negativity (4)' but the negativity is defined in Eq. (1.6). Please correct the reference.
  4. [§1] The phrase 'non-positive Wigner function' is ambiguous; Hudson's theorem concerns non-negative Wigner functions. Consider clarifying the wording.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; calculations are self-contained, but the abstract's claim about curvature perturbations rests on a χ-vs-R identification that the paper itself does not make.

full rationale

The derivation is largely self-contained. The Wigner function (3.33) is computed directly from the wavefunction (3.21), which follows from the explicitly stated two-Gaussian 'method of images' ansatz (3.12) imposed to satisfy the Dirichlet boundary condition (3.10). The negativity is a consequence of that non-Gaussian ansatz plus Hudson's theorem, not a fit to target data. The growth law (4.9) is openly described as a fit ('fitting the numerically evaluated N(ΔN⋆) reveals... coefficients ... must be determined empirically'), so it is not a fitted input masquerading as a prediction. The main caveat is not circularity but a representation gap: the abstract says 'compute the Wigner function of curvature perturbations', yet §2.2 states 'we will study its quantum state rather than the one of R' after giving the non-linear relation (2.15). Wigner functions are not covariant under non-linear canonical transformations, and the paper itself attributes part of the negativity to the non-linear map (3.18). It neither computes W_R nor shows that negativity survives the inverse of (2.15). This is an unsupported inference about physical observables, and a correctness risk, but it is not an input-output identity. Self-citations (e.g. [20]) are used for standard canonical-transformation results and are not load-bearing for the central computation. Hence no circular step meets the required evidentiary threshold.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The computation is self-contained after a set of domain assumptions: EFT decoupling limit, constant-roll background, separate-universe matching at σ, a Dirichlet boundary with method-of-images ansatz, and neglect of decoherence. The headline a^2 law is obtained by fitting the numerical negativity, so it is not an independent prediction.

free parameters (3)
  • \bar P_R (curvature amplitude at Hubble crossing) = 0.14 (reference), 0.28 (second benchmark)
    Chosen by hand; sets amplitude of perturbations and controls how deep in the non-perturbative regime the Wigner function is. Values are far larger than observed ~2e-9.
  • σ (coarse-graining / matching scale) = 1 (0.8 and 0.4 also tested)
    Sets matching time N*=-ln σ; chosen for numerical convenience; authors verify moderate robustness.
  • c1, c2 in negativity fit N = c1 e^{2ΔN} + c2 = (0.15, 0.035) and (0.17, -0.034)
    Empirically fitted to the numerically computed negativity; supports the a^2 growth claim, but is fit, not derived.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Hudson's theorem: pure state Wigner non-negative iff Gaussian
    Used in Sec. 1 to link non-Gaussianity to Wigner negativity.
  • domain assumption EFT of inflation decoupling limit: metric fluctuations neglected, sound speed c_s=1, action Eq. (2.7) valid to all orders in χ at leading order in ϵ1
    Sec. 2.1; underlies the entire Hamiltonian and non-linear map.
  • domain assumption Separate-universe matching: linear perturbation theory until t⋆, homogeneous-mode nonlinear dynamics after; modes coarse-grained at λσ
    Sec. 2.4; determines initial Gaussian state and where non-linearities enter.
  • ad hoc to paper Dirichlet boundary ψ_Y(Y_b)=0 and method-of-images ansatz (two-Gaussian superposition)
    Sec. 3.1 Eq. (3.12); imposed for normalizability; creates the interference structure that later yields negativity.
  • domain assumption Infinite USR phase with constant ϵ2=-6
    Secs. 3.1, 4.1; authors note it must be embedded in a realistic finite inflation for boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption Closed system: decoherence/environment neglected
    Secs. 1 and 5; required for the pure-state Wigner function and negativity; authors postpone open-system effects.
  • domain assumption Goldstone χ quantum state is the relevant object for curvature perturbation quantumness, despite non-linear χ-R relation
    Sec. 2.2; the paper computes W(χ0,π0) and does not transform to R.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33249 in / 17781 out tokens · 187574 ms · 2026-08-03T06:43:39.873078+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Inflationary perturbations are quantum in origin. Yet, when computing cosmological observables, they are often treated as classical stochastic fields. Do they nevertheless retain quantum birthmarks? A hallmark of genuinely quantum behaviour is quantum interferences, arising from phase coherence between distinct branches of the wavefunction. Such interference is diagnosed by the non-positivity of the Wigner function, and according to Hudson's theorem, the only pure states with positive Wigner functions are Gaussian states. Consequently, any departure from Gaussianity necessarily implies a non-positive Wigner function, precluding a description in terms of a classical distribution. This motivates us to compute the Wigner function of curvature perturbations, accounting for primordial non-Gaussianities, using the EFT of inflation. We find that the Wigner function develops pronounced interference fringes on super-Hubble scales, and in particular, its negativity grows as $a^2$ in ultra-slow-roll backgrounds. These results demonstrate that quantum effects can remain significant at late times, and that squeezing alone does not ensure classicality, contrary to standard lore. This suggests that the prospects for detecting genuinely quantum signatures of the universe's origins in cosmological observables may be less bleak than previously thought.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Stochastic Inflation

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Stochastic inflation emerges as GKLS open-system dynamics from tracing entangled modes entering a coarse-grained de Sitter patch, reproducing the classical phase-space Fokker-Planck equation.

  2. Hidden quantum-informatic symmetries of quasi-de Sitter backgrounds

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Wands-dual quasi-de Sitter backgrounds produce identical symplectic eigenvalues in the Gaussian covariance matrix of localized scalar modes, revealing a quantum-informatic symmetry preserved by the duality's canonical...

  3. A Landscape of Cosmological Decoherence

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A geometric landscape of mixed states for cosmological perturbations unifies decoherence models and derives non-linearity bounds that rule out decohered thermal states and limit amplitude-diagonal models to under 70 e...

  4. A Landscape of Cosmological Decoherence

    gr-qc 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Requiring decohered cosmological perturbations to admit a classical P-function forces their momentum variance above the vacuum value, and demanding a linear gravitational potential at reheating bounds that variance by...

  5. Classical and quantum evolution of inflationary fluctuations

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classical and quantum correlation functions of inflationary perturbations diverge exponentially with e-folds when interactions are relevant, even if forced to agree at an intermediate time.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 83 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99

    1980

  2. [2]

    Sato,First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe,mnras 195(1981) 467

    K. Sato,First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe,mnras 195(1981) 467

    1981

  3. [3]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  4. [4]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

    1982

  5. [5]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

    1982

  6. [6]

    Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    1979

  7. [7]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

    1981

  8. [8]

    Guth and S.Y

    A.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110

    1982

  9. [10]

    Bardeen, P.J

    J.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner,Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe,prd28(1983) 679. [11]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1983

  10. [12]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Quantum Discord of Cosmic Inflation: Can we Show that CMB Anisotropies are of Quantum-Mechanical Origin?,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023505 [1510.04038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [13]

    Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

    1986

  12. [14]

    Polarski and A.A

    D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations,Class. Quant. Grav.13(1996) 377 [gr-qc/9504030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  13. [15]

    Lesgourgues, D

    J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 479 [gr-qc/9611019]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  14. [16]

    Kiefer, D

    C. Kiefer, D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky,Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D7(1998) 455 [gr-qc/9802003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  15. [17]

    Kiefer and D

    C. Kiefer and D. Polarski,Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?,Adv. Sci. Lett.2(2009) 164 [0810.0087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [18]

    de Putter and O

    R. de Putter and O. Dor´ e,In search of an observational quantum signature of the primordial perturbations in slow-roll and ultraslow-roll inflation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043511 [1905.01394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [19]

    Grishchuk and Y.V

    L.P. Grishchuk and Y.V. Sidorov,Squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons and primordial density fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3413

    1990

  18. [20]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin,Canonical transformations and squeezing formalism in cosmology, JCAP02(2020) 022 [1910.01916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [21]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga and P.R. Metidieri,Does inflation squeeze cosmological perturbations?, JCAP09(2022) 032 [2203.07066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [22]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek, J. Martin and V. Vennin,Minimal decoherence from inflation,JCAP07(2023) 022 [2211.11046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [23]

    Sharman and G.D

    J.W. Sharman and G.D. Moore,Decoherence due to the Horizon after Inflation,JCAP11 (2007) 020 [0708.3353]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [24]

    Joos and H.D

    E. Joos and H.D. Zeh,The Emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment,Z. Phys. B59(1985) 223

    1985

  23. [25]

    Zurek,Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?,Phys

    W.H. Zurek,Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 1516

    1981

  24. [26]

    Brandenberger, R

    R.H. Brandenberger, R. Laflamme and M. Mijic,Classical Perturbations From Decoherence of Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Mod. Phys. Lett. A5(1990) 2311

    1990

  25. [27]

    Lombardo and D

    F.C. Lombardo and D. Lopez Nacir,Decoherence during inflation: The Generation of classical inhomogeneities,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 063506 [gr-qc/0506051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [28]

    Burgess, R

    C.P. Burgess, R. Holman and D. Hoover,Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063534 [astro-ph/0601646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  27. [29]

    Martineau,On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation,Class

    P. Martineau,On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 5817 [astro-ph/0601134]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [30]

    Nelson,Quantum Decoherence During Inflation from Gravitational Nonlinearities,JCAP 03(2016) 022 [1601.03734]

    E. Nelson,Quantum Decoherence During Inflation from Gravitational Nonlinearities,JCAP 03(2016) 022 [1601.03734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [31]

    Shandera, N

    S. Shandera, N. Agarwal and A. Kamal,Open quantum cosmological system,Phys. Rev. D 98(2018) 083535 [1708.00493]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [32]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Observational constraints on quantum decoherence during inflation,JCAP05(2018) 063 [1801.09949]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [33]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Non Gaussianities from Quantum Decoherence during Inflation, JCAP06(2018) 037 [1805.05609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [34]

    Martin, A

    J. Martin, A. Micheli and V. Vennin,Discord and decoherence,JCAP04(2022) 051 [2112.05037]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [35]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Benchmarking the cosmological master equations,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 1085 [2209.01929]. – 38 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [36]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain and V. Vennin,Quantum recoherence in the early universe,EPL142 (2023) 69002 [2212.09486]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [37]

    Daddi Hammou and N

    A. Daddi Hammou and N. Bartolo,Cosmic decoherence: primordial power spectra and non-Gaussianities,JCAP04(2023) 055 [2211.07598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [38]

    Lopez and N

    F. Lopez and N. Bartolo,Quantum signatures and decoherence during inflation from deep subhorizon perturbations,2503.23150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [39]

    Sudarsky,Shortcomings in the Understanding of Why Cosmological Perturbations Look Classical,Int

    D. Sudarsky,Shortcomings in the Understanding of Why Cosmological Perturbations Look Classical,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011) 509 [0906.0315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [40]

    Martin, V

    J. Martin, V. Vennin and P. Peter,Cosmological Inflation and the Quantum Measurement Problem,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 103524 [1207.2086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [41]

    Lim,Quantum information of cosmological correlations,Phys

    E.A. Lim,Quantum information of cosmological correlations,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 083522 [1410.5508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [42]

    Campo and R

    D. Campo and R. Parentani,Inflationary spectra and violations of Bell inequalities,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 025001 [astro-ph/0505376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [43]

    Maldacena,A model with cosmological Bell inequalities,Fortsch

    J. Maldacena,A model with cosmological Bell inequalities,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 10 [1508.01082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [44]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Bell inequalities for continuous-variable systems in generic squeezed states,Phys. Rev. A93(2016) 062117 [1605.02944]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [45]

    Choudhury, S

    S. Choudhury, S. Panda and R. Singh,Bell violation in the Sky,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 60 [1607.00237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [46]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Obstructions to Bell CMB Experiments,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063501 [1706.05001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [47]

    Kanno and J

    S. Kanno and J. Soda,Infinite violation of Bell inequalities in inflation,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 083501 [1705.06199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [48]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Leggett-Garg Inequalities for Squeezed States,Phys. Rev. A94 (2016) 052135 [1611.01785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [49]

    Ando and V

    K. Ando and V. Vennin,Bipartite temporal Bell inequalities for two-mode squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A102(2020) 052213 [2007.00458]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [50]

    Green and R.A

    D. Green and R.A. Porto,Signals of a Quantum Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 251302 [2001.09149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [51]

    Green and Y

    D. Green and Y. Huang,Flat space analog for the quantum origin of structure,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 023531 [2203.10042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [52]

    Launay, G.I

    Y.L. Launay, G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,Quantitative classicality in cosmological interactions during inflation,JCAP05(2025) 071 [2412.16143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [53]

    Belfiglio, R

    A. Belfiglio, R. Franzosi and O. Luongo,Multipartite entanglement features of primordial non-gaussianities,2511.23389

    arXiv

  52. [54]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Real-space entanglement of quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 085012 [2106.14575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [55]

    Martin and V

    J.´ e. Martin and V. Vennin,Real-space entanglement in the Cosmic Microwave Background, JCAP10(2021) 036 [2106.15100]. – 39 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [56]

    Espinosa-Portal´ es and V

    L. Espinosa-Portal´ es and V. Vennin,Real-space Bell inequalities in de Sitter,JCAP07 (2022) 037 [2203.03505]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [57]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga, P. Ribes-Metidieri, D. Kranas and S. Nadal-Gisbert,How ubiquitous is entanglement in quantum field theory?,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 085005 [2302.13742]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [58]

    Boutivas, D

    K. Boutivas, D. Katsinis, G. Pastras and N. Tetradis,Entanglement in cosmology,JCAP 04(2024) 017 [2310.17208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [59]

    Belfiglio, O

    A. Belfiglio, O. Luongo and S. Mancini,Quantum entanglement in cosmology,Phys. Rept. 1146(2025) 1 [2506.03841]

    arXiv 2025

  58. [60]

    Agullo, B

    I. Agullo, B. Bonga and P. Ribes-Metidieri,Inflation does not create entanglement in local observables,Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 01LT01 [2409.16366]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [61]

    Ribes Metidieri,Entangling Stories: Exploring Finite-Dimensional Subsystems in Curved Spacetimes Using Relativistic Quantum Information, Ph.D

    P. Ribes Metidieri,Entangling Stories: Exploring Finite-Dimensional Subsystems in Curved Spacetimes Using Relativistic Quantum Information, Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen U., 2025

    2025

  60. [62]

    Ribes-Metidieri, I

    P. Ribes-Metidieri, I. Agullo and B. Bonga,Entanglement and correlations between local observables in de Sitter spacetime,2511.17382

    arXiv

  61. [63]

    Agullo, E

    I. Agullo, E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, S. Nadal-Gisbert, P. Ribes-Metidieri and K. Yamaguchi, Correlation and Entanglement partners in Gaussian systems,2512.11055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [64]

    Wigner,On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,Phys

    E. Wigner,On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,Phys. Rev.40 (1932) 749

    1932

  63. [65]

    Case,Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians,American Journal of Physics76(2008) 937

    W.B. Case,Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians,American Journal of Physics76(2008) 937

    2008

  64. [66]

    J.S. BELL,Epr cor- relations and epw distributions,Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences480(1986) 263 [https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12429.x]

    arXiv 1986

  65. [67]

    Revzen, P.A

    M. Revzen, P.A. Mello, A. Mann and L.M. Johansen,Bell’s inequality violation with non-negative wigner functions,Phys. Rev. A71(2005) 022103

    2005

  66. [68]

    Revzen,The wigner function as distribution function,Foundations of Physics36(2006) 546

    M. Revzen,The wigner function as distribution function,Foundations of Physics36(2006) 546

    2006

  67. [69]

    Martin,Cosmic Inflation, Quantum Information and the Pioneering Role of John S Bell in Cosmology,Universe5(2019) 92 [1904.00083]

    J. Martin,Cosmic Inflation, Quantum Information and the Pioneering Role of John S Bell in Cosmology,Universe5(2019) 92 [1904.00083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [70]

    Kenfack and K

    A. Kenfack and K. ˙Zyczkowski,Negativity of the Wigner function as an indicator of non-classicality,J. Opt. B6(2004) 396

    2004

  69. [71]

    Albarelli, M.G

    F. Albarelli, M.G. Genoni, M.G.A. Paris and A. Ferraro,Resource theory of quantum non-Gaussianity and Wigner negativity,Phys. Rev. A98(2018) 052350 [1804.05763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [72]

    Hudson,When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?,Reports on Mathematical Physics6(1974) 249

    R. Hudson,When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?,Reports on Mathematical Physics6(1974) 249

    1974

  71. [73]

    Soto and P

    F. Soto and P. Claverie,When is the Wigner function of multidimensional systems nonnegative?,Journal of Mathematical Physics24(1983) 97

    1983

  72. [74]

    Haque, G

    S.S. Haque, G. Jafari and B. Underwood,Inflation is Not Magic,2512.10126

    arXiv

  73. [75]

    Cheung, P

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP03(2008) 014 [0709.0293]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  74. [76]

    Baumann and D

    D. Baumann and D. Green,Equilateral Non-Gaussianity and New Physics on the Horizon, JCAP09(2011) 014 [1102.5343]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [77]

    Green, K

    D. Green, K. Gupta and Y. Huang,A Goldstone boson equivalence for inflation,JHEP09 (2024) 117 [2403.05274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [78]

    Firouzjahi and B

    H. Firouzjahi and B. Nikbakht,Hamiltonians to all Orders in Perturbation Theory and Higher Loop Corrections in Single Field Inflation with PBHs Formation,2502.10287

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [79]

    Creminelli, S

    P. Creminelli, S. Renaux-Petel, G. Tambalo and V. Yingcharoenrat,Non-perturbative wavefunction of the universe in inflation with (resonant) features,JHEP03(2024) 010 [2401.10212]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  78. [80]

    Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

    J.M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  79. [81]

    Cheung, A.L

    C. Cheung, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore,On the consistency relation of the 3-point function in single field inflation,JCAP02(2008) 021 [0709.0295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [82]

    Behbahani, A

    S.R. Behbahani, A. Dymarsky, M. Mirbabayi and L. Senatore,(Small) Resonant non-Gaussianities: Signatures of a Discrete Shift Symmetry in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JCAP12(2012) 036 [1111.3373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

Showing first 80 references.