Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Dimensional structure of thermodynamic topology in ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black hole topology is fixed by dimension parity and maximal rotation.

desk verdict The even/odd dimension rule for thermodynamic topology in ultraspinning Kerr-AdS is plausible and the d=4,5 calculations are clean, but the d≥6 claim rests on unshown numerical scans, and Eq. (10) has an entropy typo that should be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.05231 v2 pith:3HZJKXW6 submitted 2026-02-05 hep-th gr-qc

Min Tian , Ying Chen , Di Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords thermodynamictopologyultraspinningblackholesKerr-AdSholethermodynamicswindingnumberoff-shellfreeenergysuperentropictopologicaldefects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes — rotating AdS black holes boosted so one angular velocity reaches the speed of light — are claimed to have exactly two possible thermodynamic topological structures, regardless of spacetime dimension. The paper assigns most configurations to the standard class W^{1+}, while odd-dimensional black holes carrying the maximal number of independent rotation parameters form a distinct subclass tilde W^{1+}. The classification is read off from the ordering of stable and unstable branches in the zero-point sequence of a vector field derived from an off-shell free energy, together with the endpoint behavior of the inverse temperature. If correct, this provides a dimension-independent rule for the phase structure of this entire black hole family.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the off-shell Helmholtz free energy F = M - S/τ, with τ the inverse temperature of a cavity, and the associated two-component vector field φ = (∂F/∂r_h, -cosΘ/sin²Θ). Zero points of φ correspond to black hole states; each zero carries a winding number w (+1 for stable, -1 for unstable), and the global topological number W is the sum. The classification hinges on the asymptotic behavior of the inverse temperature τ as the horizon radius approaches its minimum r_m and infinity: for the maximal-rotation odd-dimensional case τ(r_m)=0 and τ(∞)=0, whereas all other cases have τ(r_m)=∞ and τ(∞)=0, which enforces different endpoint winding orderings and hence different (sub)classes.

What would settle it

Compute the zero-point sequence for a d=6 or d=8 ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black hole with all rotation parameters nonzero and unequal; if the innermost zero point carries w=-1, or if τ(r_m)=0 instead of ∞, the even-dimensional W^{1+} classification fails. Similarly, for d=7 with fewer than maximal rotations, any rotation-parameter value that reproduces the tilde W^{1+} endpoint pattern would break the two-class rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the thermodynamic topological class of an ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black hole is decided by two binary features: whether the spacetime dimension is odd, and whether the black hole carries the maximal number of independent rotation parameters. For even dimensions (d=4,6,8,...), every configuration — regardless of rotation count — is in the standard class W^{1+}, with a zero-point sequence that starts and ends with stable branches (w=+1) and global winding number W=1. For odd dimensions (d=5,7,9,...), configurations with fewer than the maximal rotations also sit in W^{1+}, with both endpoints stable. But the maximal-rotation odd-dimensional cases show a different endpoi

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the unproven assumption that the finite set of higher-dimensional representative cases (d=6..11) and the endpoint asymptotics examined exhaust all possible zero-point sequences for arbitrarily large dimensions and all rotation-parameter values.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the classification is correct, every ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black hole in any dimension has a phase structure described by either the W^{1+} sequence or the tilde W^{1+} sequence, with no higher-dimensional surprises.
  • The global topological number W=1 is identical across the whole family, so the subclass distinction does not change the total invariant but only the internal ordering of stable and unstable branches.
  • A practical diagnostic follows: to identify the topological class of an ultraspinning Kerr-AdS solution, check the dimension parity and whether all N rotation parameters are nonzero.
  • The paper's off-shell free energy plus endpoint analysis method can be carried over to charged ultraspinning solutions and supergravity embeddings, as the authors note.
  • The tilde W^{1+} subclass carries a richer high-temperature phase structure (three branches) than the standard W^{1+} case (one stable large branch), which is observable in the zero-point plots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification relies on representative numerical cases for d=6..11 at unspecified rotation parameters; a complete analytic derivation from the mass/entropy asymptotics would remove the dependence on sampled cases.
  • The endpoint asymmetry (τ(r_m)=0 versus ∞) appears to be the structural driver; if it can be proven from the metric's asymptotic form alone, the two-class rule would follow without numerical scanning.
  • A natural extension is to test whether charge or non-AdS asymptotics introduce additional subclasses in the same ultraspinning family, or whether the parity-plus-maximal-rotation rule persists.
  • If the rule is universal, it suggests that the thermodynamic topology of superentropic black holes is insensitive to parameter magnitudes, depending only on which degrees of freedom are active.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the thermodynamic-topology framework to ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. It constructs off-shell free energies and vector fields for the d=4 and d=5 cases, derives zero-point conditions, assigns winding numbers, and identifies asymptotic inverse-temperature endpoints. On this basis, together with a brief asserted numerical scan for d=6,...,11, it claims a universal classification: all configurations fall into the standard class W^{1+}, except odd-dimensional black holes with the maximal number of independent rotations, which form the distinct subclass \tilde{W}^{1+}. The central claim is that this two-structure classification is dimension-independent and exhaustive.

Significance. If established, the claimed parity-plus-maximal-rotation rule would be a striking and simple organizational principle for the thermodynamic topology of an entire black-hole family. The paper provides explicit, checkable algebraic results for d=4 (Eqs. (12)-(15)) and d=5 (Eqs. (16)-(19)), and the d=4/5 winding-number assignments are concrete and falsifiable. However, the arbitrary-dimensional claim is not supported by the reported evidence. Section III.C contains no equations, figures, parameter ranges, or numerical data for d>=6; the endpoint argument is heuristic for general d; and there is an apparent inconsistency between the general entropy formula and the d=5 free energy. The paper is therefore best viewed as a plausible conjecture with detailed lower-dimensional illustrations rather than a demonstrated universal classification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C] The entire evidence for d>=6 is a single paragraph asserting that the off-shell free energy and vector field were constructed and that 'representative cases' with d=6,...,11 were 'numerically analyzed', with no equations, figures, parameter values, or data. The bullet points then assert the classification for all even and odd dimensions. This is the load-bearing evidence for the paper's central claim. Please provide the general expressions for F and phi in arbitrary d, explicit endpoint computations, and reproducible numerical results (e.g., tables of zero-point sequences or plots) for the claimed representative cases, including the rotation-parameter values used.
  2. [Eq. (10) vs. Eq. (16)] There is an apparent inconsistency in the d=5 entropy. With d=5, Eq. (10) gives S = (pi^2/2) * r_h (r_h^2+l^2)(r_h^2+a_1^2)/Xi_1, assuming the single non-special rotation is a_1. The second term of Eq. (16), however, implies S = (pi^2/2) * (r_h^2+l^2)(r_h^2+a_1^2)/(Xi_1 r_h). These differ by a factor of r_h^2. Since Eq. (16) is used to derive Eqs. (17)-(19), either Eq. (10) contains a misprint or the d=5 calculation is built on an inconsistent entropy. The higher-dimensional construction is inherited from the general formula in Eq. (10), so this discrepancy must be resolved and the derived quantities re-checked.
  3. [Sec. III.B and III.C] The distinction between W^{1+} and \tilde{W}^{1+} rests on the endpoint behavior tau(r_m)=0 versus tau(r_m)=infty at the minimal horizon radius. For d=5 this is demonstrated by two examples (a_1/r0=0.5 and a_1=0), but no general d=5 analysis is given, and no d>=6 endpoint computation is shown. The claim that maximal-rotation odd-dimensional cases always have tau(r_m)=0 and all others tau(r_m)=infty is therefore an extrapolation. Please derive the limits tau(r_m) and tau(infty) for general d, general rotation count, and general rotation parameters, or provide systematic numerical evidence covering the parameter space. Without this, a different endpoint pattern in an unexamined dimension or rotation sector cannot be excluded.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table I] The table caption defines DP and AP but the entry 'one more AP' is vague. Specify the number or range of annihilation points for each row, or state explicitly that it is a representative feature rather than a counted invariant.
  2. [Sec. III.A/III.B] The choice l=r0 is made without introducing r0. Please define the cavity length scale and clarify whether the topological classification is independent of l and of the rotation-parameter values, since only a_1/r0=0.5 and a_1=0 are shown for d=5.
  3. [Sec. II] The notation x^nu = (tau,r_h,Theta) is introduced but the vector field components are written as phi^{r_h}, phi^Theta. The correspondence between the abstract index a and the coordinates should be made explicit for readers applying Eq. (4).
  4. [References [28,30]] The classes W^{1+} and \tilde{W}^{1+} are invoked from Refs. [28,30], but the definitions are not restated. Since the paper's conclusion depends on assigning these labels, a one-sentence definition of each class (or a reference to the defining table) would improve self-containedness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the d=4/5 class assignments are computed from explicit off-shell free energies; the d≥6 generalization is an evidence gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central assignments for d=4 and d=5 are direct applications of the off-shell free-energy and vector-field formalism. The analytic expressions in Eqs. (12)-(15) and (16)-(19) are derived from the thermodynamic quantities in Eq. (10), and the topological class (W^{1+} vs ~W^{1+}) is read off from the endpoint behavior of tau and the winding-number sequences. No parameter is fitted to the target classification, and no claimed prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. The ~W^{1+} label originates in Ref. [30] (W. Ai and D. Wu, co-authored by the present author Di Wu), but the assignment is computed here; the citation supplies a taxonomy, not a uniqueness or existence proof, so it is at most a non-load-bearing self-citation and does not raise the circularity score. The d≥6 section rests on an unshown 'representative cases' numerical scan (Sec. III.C) and does not provide the general free-energy expressions or data; the conclusions even describe the odd-dimensional maximal-rotation behavior as 'Heuristically' suggested. This is a completeness/evidence limitation, not a circular reduction. No specific circular step can be quoted or exhibited, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No target-dependent free parameters are fitted; the free energy is built from the published mass and entropy of the ultraspinning Kerr-AdS family. The main external inputs are the thermodynamic-topology framework (Refs. [27-32]) and the thermodynamic quantities of Ref. [6]. The paper adds an unproven completeness assumption for higher dimensions.

free parameters (1)
  • a1/r0 (representative rotation parameter) = 0.5 in the 5D doubly-rotating plot
    Chosen for illustration; the classification is claimed to be independent of this value, so it is a sample point rather than a fitted parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Off-shell generalized free energy F=M-S/tau and vector field phi=(dF/dr_h, -cosTheta/sin^2Theta) with Duan phi-mapping define the topological charge and stability assignment.
    Adopted from Refs [27-32]; the paper does not re-derive the framework.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic quantities M, T, S, J of ultraspinning Kerr-AdS from Ref [6] are correct in the ultraspinning limit.
    Used to build the off-shell free energy. The printed Eq. (10) has a likely typo in the area formula, but the explicit F expressions appear consistent with the horizon equation.
  • ad hoc to paper The heat capacity alternates in sign as r_h increases for the 4D ultraspinning black hole.
    Sec. III.A asserts this without derivation and uses it to fix the ordering of winding numbers; repeated roots of T(r) could break the alternating pattern.
  • ad hoc to paper Representative cases d=6,...,11 (and two 5D rotation values) exhaust the topological possibilities of all higher dimensions and all rotation parameters.
    Sec. III.C summarizes numerical checks without showing them; the universal no-new-classes claim depends on this induction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimensional structure of thermodynamic topology in ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HZJKXW6

@misc{pith2026260205231,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimensional structure of thermodynamic topology in ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HZJKXW6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.05231}
}
abstract

In this paper, we apply the thermodynamic topology framework to ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. By constructing the off-shell Helmholtz free energy and the associated vector field, black hole states are characterized as topological defects, and their phase structures are described through zero points, winding numbers, and asymptotic thermodynamic behavior. Analyses of the four- and five-dimensional cases highlight the differences between even- and odd-dimensional configurations, while the endpoint behavior of the inverse-temperature curve, together with representative higher-dimensional cases, supports the absence of additional topological classes or subclasses. We find that only two thermodynamic topological structures appear: the standard class $W^{1+}$ for most configurations, and the distinct subclass $\tilde{W}^{1+}$ for odd-dimensional black holes with maximal rotations. These results support a unified classification scheme valid across dimensions for ultraspinning Kerr-AdS black holes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.05231 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Zero points of the vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Zero points of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multihair thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-NUT-AdS$_4$ spacetimes

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives a Christodoulou-Ruffini-type squared-mass formula for Kerr-Newman-NUT-AdS4 using secondary NUT hairs J_n and N, then verifies the first law and Smarr relation by differentiation.

  2. Topological changes and response singularities in black hole thermodynamic branch structure

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    In charged AdS black holes, the topological number W changes at a boundary membership event τ_a, while the branch response C_par diverges at a separate turning point τ_b, because the two diagnostics track different lo...

  3. Endpoint Control of Thermodynamic Topological Classes for Fixed Charge \texorpdfstring{$d$}{d}-dimensional Reissner--Nordstr\"om Black Holes in a Cavity

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    For fixed-charge d-dimensional RN black holes in a cavity, electric charge and outer boundary determine the refined thermodynamic topological class rather than spacetime dimension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The zero-point sequence be- gins and ends with stable branches (w= +1), and the global topological number is consistentlyW=1

    Even dimensions (d=6,8, ...): All configurations, re- gardless of the number of independent rotation param- eters, exhibit a topological structure identical to that of the four-dimensional case. The zero-point sequence be- gins and ends with stable branches (w= +1), and the global topological number is consistentlyW=1. Con- sequently, all even-dimensional...

  2. [2]

    Odd dimensions (d=7,9, ...): The classification bifur- cates according to the number of rotations. Configu- rations with the maximal number of independent rota- tion parameters display the same endpoint pattern as the five-dimensional doubly-rotating black hole: the inner- most zero point is unstable (w=−1), while the out- ermost is stable (w= +1). These ...

  3. [3]

    Hennigar, R.B

    R.A. Hennigar, R.B. Mann, and D. Kubiz ˇn´ak, Entropy In- equality Violations from Ultraspinning Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 031101 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Gnecchi, K

    A. Gnecchi, K. Hristov, D. Klemm, C. Toldo, and O. Vaughan, Rotating black holes in 4d gauged supergravity, J. High Energy Phys.01(2014) 127

    2014

  5. [5]

    Klemm, Four-dimensional black holes with unusual hori- zons, Phys

    D. Klemm, Four-dimensional black holes with unusual hori- zons, Phys. Rev. D89, 084007 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Cveti ˇc, G.W

    M. Cveti ˇc, G.W. Gibbons, D. Kubizˇn´ak, and C.N. Pope, Black hole enthalpy and an entropy inequality for the thermodynamic volume, Phys. Rev. D84, 024037 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Dolan, D

    B.P. Dolan, D. Kastor, D. Kubiz ˇn´ak, R.B. Mann, and J. Traschen, Thermodynamic volumes and isoperimetric inequal- ities for de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D87, 104017 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Hennigar, D

    R.A. Hennigar, D. Kubiz ˇn´ak, R.B. Mann, and N. Musoke, Ul- traspinning limits and super-entropic black holes, J. High En- ergy Phys.06(2015) 096

    2015

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Noorbakhsh and M

    S.M. Noorbakhsh and M. Ghominejad, Ultra-spinning gauged supergravity black holes and their Kerr/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D95, 046002 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Noorbakhsh and M

    S.M. Noorbakhsh and M. Ghominejad, Higher dimensional charged AdS black holes at ultra-spinning limit and their 2d CFT duals, arXiv:1702.03448

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Noorbakhsh and M.H

    S.M. Noorbakhsh and M.H. Vahidinia, Extremal vanishing horizon Kerr-AdS black holes at ultraspinning limit, J. High Energy Phys.01(2018) 042

    2018

  4. [12]

    D. Wu, P. Wu, H. Yu, and S.-Q. Wu, Are ultraspinning Kerr- Sen-AdS4 black holes always superentropic?, Phys. Rev. D102, 044007 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Wu, S.-Q

    D. Wu, S.-Q. Wu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, Aspects of the dyonic Kerr- Sen-AdS4 black hole and its ultraspinning version, Phys. Rev. D103, 044014 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Ultra-spinning Chow’s black holes in six-dimensional gauged supergravity and their thermodynam- ical properties, J. High Energy Phys.11(2021) 031

    2021

  7. [15]

    Appels, L

    M. Appels, L. Cuspinera, R. Gregory, P. Krtou ˇs, and D. Ku- bizˇn´ak, Are superentropic black holes superentropic?, J. High Energy Phys.02(2020) 195

    2020

  8. [16]

    Johnson, Instability of super-entropic black holes in extended thermodynamics, Mod

    C.V . Johnson, Instability of super-entropic black holes in extended thermodynamics, Mod. Phys. Lett. A35, 2050098 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Johnson, V .L

    C.V . Johnson, V .L. Martin, and A. Svesko, A microscopic de- scription of thermodynamic volume in extended black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D101, 086006 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    D. Wu, P. Wu, H. Yu, and S.-Q. Wu, Notes on the thermody- namics of superentropic AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D101, 024057 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Xu, The correspondence between thermodynamic curva- ture and isoperimetric theorem from ultraspinning black hole, Phys

    Z.M. Xu, The correspondence between thermodynamic curva- ture and isoperimetric theorem from ultraspinning black hole, Phys. Lett. B807, 135529 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Di, Thermodynamics and stability of ultraspinning black holes, arXiv:2601.22565

    Z. Di, Thermodynamics and stability of ultraspinning black holes, arXiv:2601.22565

  13. [21]

    Sinamuli and R.B

    M. Sinamuli and R.B. Mann, Super-entropic black holes and the Kerr-CFT correspondence, J. High Energy Phys.08(2016) 148

    2016

  14. [22]

    Flathmann and N

    K. Flathmann and N. Wassermann, Geodesic equations for par- ticles and light in the black spindle spacetime, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y .)61, 122504 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Imseis, A.A Balushi, and R.B

    M.T.N. Imseis, A.A Balushi, and R.B. Mann, Null hyper- surfaces in Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole and super-entropic black hole spacetimes, Classical Quantum Gravity38, 045018 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Noda and Y .C

    S. Noda and Y .C. Ong, Null hypersurface caustics, closed null curves, and super entropy, Phys. Rev. D103, 024053 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Wu and P

    D. Wu and P. Wu, Null hypersurface caustics for high- dimensional superentropic black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104020 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    D. Wu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, Shadowless rapidly rotating yet not ultraspinning Kerr-AdS4 and Kerr-Newman-AdS4 black holes, Phys. Rev. D104, L121501 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Belhaj, H

    A. Belhaj, H. Belmahi, and M. Benali, Superentropic AdS black hole shadows, Phys. Lett. B821, 136619 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Belhaj, M

    A. Belhaj, M. Benali, and Y . Hassouni, Superentropic black hole shadows in arbitrary dimensions, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 619 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Wei, Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y .-X. Liu, and R.B. Mann, Black Hole Solutions as Topological Thermodynamic Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 191101 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Wei, Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y .-X. Liu, and R.B. Mann, Universal topological classifications of black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D110, L081501 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    D. Wu, W. Liu, S.-Q. Wu, and R.B. Mann, Novel topologi- cal classes in black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D111, L061501 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Ai and D

    W. Ai and D. Wu, ˜W 1+: Extending the topological classifica- tion of black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D112, 124024 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Thermodynamics and topological classi- fications of static non-extremal four-charge AdS black hole in the five-dimensionalN=2,STU−W 2Ugauged supergravity, arXiv:2510.20164

  26. [34]

    Chen, M.-Y

    H. Chen, M.-Y . Zhang, H. Hassanabadi, Q. Huang, Z.-W. Long, Novel topological subclass in Hoˇrava-Lifshitz black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1386 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Wu, Topological classes of rotating black holes, Phys

    D. Wu, Topological classes of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D107, 024024 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Liu and J

    C.H. Liu and J. Wang, The topological natures of the Gauss- Bonnet black hole in AdS space, Phys. Rev. D107, 064023 (2023). 7

    2023

  29. [37]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Topological classes of thermodynamics of rotating AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D107, 084002 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Wu, Classifying topology of consistent thermodynamics of the four-dimensional neutral Lorentzian NUT-charged space- times, Eur

    D. Wu, Classifying topology of consistent thermodynamics of the four-dimensional neutral Lorentzian NUT-charged space- times, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 365 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Wu, Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional Lorentzian charged Taub-NUT space- times, Eur

    D. Wu, Consistent thermodynamics and topological classes for the four-dimensional Lorentzian charged Taub-NUT space- times, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 589 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Wu, Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four- dimensional static accelerating black holes, Phys

    D. Wu, Topological classes of thermodynamics of the four- dimensional static accelerating black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 084041 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Wu, S.-Y

    D. Wu, S.-Y . Gu, X.-D. Zhu, Q.-Q. Jiang, and S.-Z. Yang, Topo- logical classes of thermodynamics of the static multi-charge AdS black holes in gauged supergravities: novel temperature- dependent thermodynamic topological phase transition, J. High Energy Phys.06(2024) 213

    2024

  34. [42]

    X.-D. Zhu, D. Wu, and D. Wen, Topological classes of ther- modynamics of the rotating charged AdS black holes in gauged supergravities, Phys. Lett. B856, 138919 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    H. Chen, D. Wu, M.-Y . Zhang, H. Hassanabadi, and Z.-W. Long, Thermodynamic topology of phantom AdS black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101617 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Chen, and S.-W

    Z.-Q. Chen, and S.-W. Wei, Thermodynamical topology with multiple defect curves for dyonic AdS black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1294 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    W. Liu, L. Zhang, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Thermodynamic topo- logical classes of the rotating, accelerating black holes, Classi- cal Quantum Gravity42, 125007 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    X.-D. Zhu, W. Liu, and D. Wu, Universal thermodynamic topological classes of rotating black holes, Phys. Lett. B860, 139163 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Chen, X.-D

    Y . Chen, X.-D. Zhu, and D. Wu, Universal thermodynamic topological classes of three-dimensional BTZ black holes, Phys. Lett. B865, 139482 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    H. Chen, D. Wu, M.-Y . Zhang, S. Zare, H. Hassanabadi, B.C. L¨utf¨uoˇglu, and Z.-W. Long, Universal thermodynamic topolog- ical classes of static black holes in Conformal Killing Gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 828 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Cunha, E

    P.V .P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C.A.R. Herdeiro, Light Ring Sta- bility in Ultra-Compact Objects, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251102 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Cunha, and C.A.R

    P.V .P. Cunha, and C.A.R. Herdeiro, Stationary Black Holes and Light Rings, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 181101 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Wei, Topological charge and black hole photon spheres, Phys

    S.-W. Wei, Topological charge and black hole photon spheres, Phys. Rev. D102, 0604039 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Guo and S

    M. Guo and S. Gao, Universal properties of light rings for sta- tionary axisymmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104031 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B858, 139052 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity II: A new solution without Cauchy horizons, Phys. Lett. B868, 139742 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Wei and Y .-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y .-X. Liu, Topology of equatorial timelike cir- cular orbits around stationary black holes, Phys. Rev. D107, 064006 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Ye and S.-W

    X. Ye and S.-W. Wei, Topological study of equatorial timelike circular orbit for spherically symmetric (hairy) black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.07(2023) 049

    2023

  49. [57]

    J. Yin, J. Jiang, and M. Zhang, Kinematic topologies of black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 044077 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Ye, and S.-W

    X. Ye, and S.-W. Wei, Novel topological phenomena of time- like circular orbits for charged test particles, Classical Quantum Gravity42, 025020 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action integrals and par- tition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D15, 2752 (1977)

    1977

  52. [60]

    York, Black-hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Ein- stein action, Phys

    J.W. York, Black-hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Ein- stein action, Phys. Rev. D33, 2092 (1986)

  53. [61]

    S.-J. Yang, R. Zhou, S.W. Wei, and Y .-X. Liu, Dynamics and kinetics of phase transition for Kerr AdS black hole on free en- ergy landscape, Phys. Rev. D105, 084030 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Li and J

    R. Li and J. Wang, Generalized free energy landscape of a black hole phase transition, Phys. Rev. D106, 106015 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Duan and M.-L

    Y .-S. Duan and M.-L. Ge,SU(2) gauge theory and electrody- namics ofNmoving magnetic monopoles, Sci. Sin.9, 1072 (1979)

    1979

  56. [64]

    Y .-S. Duan, S. Li, and G.-H. Yang, The bifurcation theory of the Gauss-Bonnet-Chern topological current and Morse function, Nucl. Phys. B514, 705 (1998)

    1998

  57. [65]

    Fu, Y .-S

    L.-B. Fu, Y .-S. Duan, and H. Zhang, Evolution of the Chern- Simons vortices, Phys. Rev. D61, 045004 (2000)

    2000

  58. [66]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Four-charge static non-extremal black holes in the five-dimensionalN=2,STU−W 2Usupergravity, arXiv:2510.13655

  59. [67]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Consistent mass formulas for the four-dimensional dyonic NUT-charged spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D105, 124013 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Revisiting mass formulas of the four- dimensional Reissner-Nordstr ¨om-NUT-AdS solutions in a dif- ferent metric form, Phys. Lett. B846, 138227 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Consistent mass formulas for higher even- dimensional Taub-NUT spacetimes and their AdS counterparts, Phys. Rev. D108, 064034 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Wu and D

    S.-Q. Wu and D. Wu, Consistent mass formulas for higher even- dimensional Reissner-Nordstr ¨om-NUT-AdS spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D108, 064035 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    miss- ing

    S.-Q. Wu and D. Wu, Is the type-D NUT C-metric really “miss- ing” from the most general Pleba ´nski-Demia´nski solution?, Phys. Rev. D110, 104072 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Wu and S.-Q

    D. Wu and S.-Q. Wu, Static four-charge squashed black hole in five-dimensionalSTU−W 2Usupergravity and its thermody- namics, arXiv:2601.14315

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.