Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 298 references

Electromagnetic Production of Kaons on the Nucleon

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review claims to be the first complete, self-contained map of kaon photo- and electroproduction across 70 years, covering over 50 experiments, the full theoretical model landscape, and the field's open problems.

desk verdict A solid, self-aware field review that fills a real gap: the 2003-era review is obsolete, and this one maps ~70 years of kaon photo-/electroproduction data and models with honest caveats; the 'most complete' claim is unverifiable but not deceptive. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.16230 v2 pith:BP4NMWZS submitted 2026-02-18 hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

Terry Mart , Jovan Alfian Djaja , Daniel S. Carman This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords photoproductionelectroproductionkaonhyperonstrangenessnucleonresonanceshadronicmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that the electromagnetic production of strangeness—producing a kaon and a hyperon from a photon or electron hitting a nucleon—has matured enough to deserve a single, self-contained reference work. It argues that this review is the first such overview and the most complete and up-to-date one available, covering more than 50 dedicated experiments over roughly 70 years, the theoretical models built to describe them, and a candid list of unsettled problems. A sympathetic reader should care because the review positions kaon photoproduction and electroproduction as a complementary window onto excited nucleon states, hypernuclear physics, and the kaon's electromagnetic form factor—questions that touch how the strong interaction builds matter.

What carries the argument

The review's organizing machinery is the unified formalism for electroproduction—one-photon exchange, virtual photoproduction, the multipole decomposition into electric, magnetic, and scalar/longitudinal amplitudes, and the full set of response functions—applied to the six kaon-hyperon isospin channels. This common language lets the paper present all experiments and models on a single footing, and the dataset tables are the load-bearing device that lets the review claim completeness.

What would settle it

A specific test is to check the completeness claim by systematic bibliographic comparison: if any substantial published kaon photo- or electroproduction measurement (or an entire model class) from the covered period is absent from the dataset tables and not discussed in the unsettled-problems chapter, the 'most complete' claim is weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the introduction and abstract, is that this work offers the most complete and up-to-date review of kaon photo- and electroproduction available, and the first-ever in-depth overview of both experimental and theoretical progress in the field. The evidence assembled is a catalog of the published experimental record (tabulated by observable, final state, energy range, and facility era), a systematic classification of theoretical approaches (quark models, chiral perturbation theory, isobar models, partial-wave analyses, coupled-channel analyses, and high-energy exchange models), and a chapter of unsettled problems. The load-bearing assertion is one of coverage: that t

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions depend on whether its literature compilation is accurate and complete; the authors concede that omissions from oversight, ignorance, and personal bias are inevitable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the review's coverage claim holds, a newcomer can enter the field from this one document instead of assembling two decades of conference proceedings and primary papers.
  • The dataset tables make gaps visible, including the fact that neutron-target data amount to only about 7% of proton-target data, which can guide where future experiments would have the most leverage.
  • The model-status chapter implies that single-channel isobar models, as currently fitted, cannot reproduce the electroproduction data, strengthening the case for coupled-channel global analyses.
  • The 'unsettled problems' chapter functions as a roadmap, telling the community which discrepancies are real and what measurements or model developments are needed next.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader could infer that the field's next major experimental payoff will come from neutron-target measurements, since the dataset tables show that channel to be the least populated while carrying unique isospin information.
  • If the compilation is as complete as claimed, the long-standing 'missing resonances' question becomes addressable by global coupled-channel fits that use the tabulated data as a benchmark.
  • The review's split between single-channel isobar models and coupled-channel approaches suggests that the theoretical bottleneck is not data volume alone but the absence of a model that describes all observables simultaneously.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review article covering roughly 70 years of kaon photo- and electroproduction on the nucleon. It develops the elementary production formalism (kinematics, amplitudes, multipoles, isospin structure, observables, gauge-invariance restoration, and the self-analyzing Lambda decay), then surveys the experimental dataset from early synchrotrons through the JLab 12-GeV era and future 22-GeV plans, followed by a taxonomy of theoretical models (quark models, ChPT, isobar, coupled-channel, and Regge approaches) and phenomenological applications. The stated goal is to be the most complete and up-to-date review available, supported by roughly 650 references and extensive dataset tables.

Significance. Within the inherent limits of a literature review, the paper delivers on its core promise: the dataset tables (Tables 3.1–3.15) and the model survey in Section 5 give a current, detailed map of the field, and the authors are careful to flag non-unique conventions (Section 3.6.3, 'Caveat emptor!') and unresolved controversies (Section 2.6, gauge-invariance restoration). The discussion of isobar models is balanced and explicitly notes that their failure to reproduce electroproduction data is not yet an indictment because they have not been refit to those data. The review is useful for both newcomers and practitioners. Its main limitation is that the 'most complete' claim cannot be independently verified from the manuscript alone, a point the authors themselves concede in the final paragraph of Section 1; however, the field-level judgments that matter, such as the relative scarcity of neutron-target data, are internally checkable from the tables.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The phrase 'most complete and up-to-date review' is strong and is immediately qualified in the final paragraph of Section 1, where the authors admit likely omissions. I suggest softening the claim to 'comprehensive' or adding a sentence describing the selection criteria and inclusion policy. This would align the claim with the actual, necessarily curated, coverage.
  2. [Eq. (2.48)] In the expression for the differential cross section, the flux factor appears as '(k1·pN)^2 − m_e m_N'; this should presumably be 'm_e^2 m_N^2'. Please correct the typo.
  3. [Table 3.3] In the MAMI 2013 row for K0Σ+ data, the Nbin column lists '42Λ, 42Σ0'. A K0Σ+ final state cannot have Lambda and Sigma0 bins. This appears to be a copy-and-paste error; please check the original reference and correct the final-state label or the hyperon content.
  4. [Section 3.6.3] The 'Caveat emptor!' discussion of non-unique structure-function pre-factors is valuable and should be kept. However, it would help the reader if the convention used in Tables 3.10 and 3.11 were stated explicitly in the table captions, not only in the text, since tables are often consulted independently.
  5. [Section 4.1 / Table 4.1] The table of PDG status upgrades for N* states is useful, but the rating symbols (* through ****) are not defined in the caption. Please add a one-sentence definition or refer explicitly to the PDG conventions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a literature review whose conclusions derive from surveyed data and models, not from its own fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not a derivation of new physics from first principles. Its central claims—that it provides a comprehensive overview and that certain model classes fail on electroproduction data—are empirical statements about the published experimental and theoretical record, not consequences of a fitted parameter or a self-referential definition. The authors' own models (Kaon-MAID, Mart-Bennhold) are cited and described, but they are treated as objects of review alongside external models (Saclay-Lyon, Ghent RPR, Bonn-Gatchina, ANL-Osaka) and are explicitly criticized where they fail: 'it is abundantly clear that none of the available isobar models are able to reproduce the kinematic dependence seen in the KY electroproduction cross sections and polarization observables with their current parameters' (§3.6.3). This is a negative assessment of surveyed work, not a load-bearing self-citation. The paper's §1 caveat ('Inevitably, our selections and our focuses reflect our own personal opinions and biases. No doubt, too, there are some omissions...') concerns completeness of the literature compilation, which is an external curation risk, not an internal circularity. No fitted input is renamed a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force a conclusion, and no quantity is defined in terms of the result it is used to produce. A failure to be truly complete would undermine the review's value, but it would not make the review circular. Thus no specific circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no free parameters and postulates no invented entities. The models it surveys are themselves fitted to data with many free parameters (Section 3.6.3 explicitly notes 'model fits to the cross section data are generally obtained at the expense of many free parameters'), but the review only reports that status. The axioms listed are the background physics the formalism and field conclusions presuppose, plus the coverage-fidelity assumption on the compiled literature. Speculative entities discussed (missing N* resonances, pentaquark candidates, a kaonic nucleus, the N(1685) hint, molecular K*Y states) are attributed to the cited literature, not introduced by this paper.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quantum Chromodynamics is the correct theory of strong interactions; strange particles are described by hadrons containing s quarks.
    The entire framing of Section 1 and the physics discussion presupposes the quark/strangeness picture validated by the Standard Model; the review does not derive this.
  • standard math One-photon exchange approximates electroproduction to ~1% accuracy.
    The whole formalism of Section 2 is built on the one-photon-exchange current factorization, with α≈1/137 justifying the truncation.
  • domain assumption SU(3) flavor symmetry constrains the leading coupling constants (Eq. 2.55: gKΛN = -(3-2α)gπNN/√3).
    Used in Section 2.6 to motivate the expected size of kaon-production cross sections and in the isobar models surveyed in Section 5.
  • domain assumption The published experimental datasets compiled in Tables 3.1–3.15 are accurate as reported.
    The review's dataset inventory and its field-level conclusions (e.g., which channels are well constrained) rest on the reliability of the original experiments as published.
  • standard math Gauge invariance must hold for the production amplitude; restoration schemes (Ohta, Haberzettl) are needed when form factors are present.
    Section 2.6 relies on the current-conservation condition kμjμ=0 as a constraint; the review reports the known difficulties (Davidson-Workman criticism) rather than resolving them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electromagnetic Production of Kaons on the Nucleon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BP4NMWZS

@misc{pith2026260216230,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electromagnetic Production of Kaons on the Nucleon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BP4NMWZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.16230}
}
abstract

Studies of the electromagnetic production of strange quarks began in the 1950s as something of a curiosity that puzzled experimentalists and theorists alike. As the datasets increased, concomitant advances in theoretical models were realized. A paradigm shift occurred in the 1990s with the development of second-generation facilities at ELSA, MAMI, SPring-8, and JLab, which brought nuclear physics experiments forward by orders of magnitude in counting statistics compared to the first-generation efforts. This was an utter boon to strangeness physics investigations, and to date, more than 50 dedicated experiments in kaon photo- and electroproduction have been completed at facilities around the world, leading to a host of experimental observables that have enabled significant advances in the exploration of strongly interacting systems that decay via $s\bar{s}$ quark pair creation. This review was designed to provide the first-ever in-depth overview of both the experimental and theoretical progress in the field of the electromagnetic production of strangeness. This work looks back over 70 years of past developments, discusses ongoing work and near-term plans, and details future possibilities being considered for third-generation facilities. Throughout this work, the primary impacts of these explorations are highlighted, along with connections to a wide range of related phenomenological applications. An important goal of this review is to provide a complete, self-contained guide into this field prepared at a level that is relevant for both new and seasoned scientists, whether experimentalists, phenomenologists, or theorists, to better understand what has been accomplished by so many dedicated folks-each building on what has come before-and to appreciate the exciting future potential for continued studies in this area. A more complete abstract is provided in the paper.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16230 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. (a) Stacked histogram of the full experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Kinematic variables for (a) kaon electroproduction on the nucleon and (b) kaon photoproduction on the nucleon. In panel (b), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Kinematics for kaon electroproduction on the nucleon in the kaon-hyperon c.m. frame. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (93 more)
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Target (x, y, z) and recoil (x ′ , y′ , z′ ) coordinate frames used to define the directions of the target and recoil polarizations [13]. where we have defined the photon equivalent energy Kγ = (s − m2 N )/2W, which in the special case of photoproduction (k 2 = 0) re…
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Feynman diagrams for the Born terms contributing to kaon photoproduction on the nucleon, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2_4.png]
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: (a) Feynman diagram for the weak decay of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2_5.png]
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: Angular distributions of the Λ decay to a proton and a π− for three different invariant mass bins (GeV) measured by CLAS. Figure adapted from Ref. [41]. where we have defined PΛ as the Λ polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2_6.png]
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Schematics of representative experimental setups for strangeness physics studies in the period from the 1950s to the 1980s. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3_1.png]
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Representative key early results from KY photoproduction studies. (a) Differential cross section from Cornell (1958) for K+Λ at Elab γ = 980 MeV and 1010 MeV as a function of θ c.m. K . Figure from Ref. [56]. (b) Λ recoil polarization P for exclusive K+Λ as a functio…
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Representative key early results from KY electroproduction studies. Differential cross sections for (a) K+Λ and (b) K+Σ0 vs. Q2 for data at an average W of 2.15 GeV selected for θ c.m. K < 25◦. The solid line is a dipole fit to the available data. cos Φ moment analys…
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Missing mass MM(e ′K+) spectrum from an early electroproduction experiment showing contributions from the ground state Λ and Σ0 , as well as the hyperon excited states Σ(1385), Λ(1405), and Λ(1520). This spectrum from DESY (1975) shows the total dataset for final ana…
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Schematic drawings of the three large acceptance hadronic physics installations at ELSA: (a) SAPHIR – showing the photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3_5.png]
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: Total cross section for (a) γp → K+Λ and (b) γp → K+Σ0 from SAPHIR (red stars, red triangles) [82, 87], CLAS (blue circles) [88], and the ABBHHM Collaboration (light blue squares) using data collected at DESY [61]. The curves are from the isobar models Kaon-MAID (sol…
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.7. Figure 3.7: Differential cross section of γp → K+Λ for cos θ c.m. K > 0.90 from BGOOD (black filled circles). Other data shown in the figure are from CLAS (red open triangles, blue open squares) [88, 104], SAPHIR (green open diamonds) [82], and LEPS (orange filled triangle, oran…
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.8. Figure 3.8: Schematic view of the LAGRANGE detector at GRAAL: (1) BGO calorimeter, (2) plastic scintillator barrel, (3) cylindrical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_3_8.png]
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.9. Figure 3.9: Schematic of (a) the LEPS detector at SPring-8 (Figure from Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3_9.png]
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.10. Figure 3.10: Schematic of the experimental layouts at MAMI. (a) Configuration of the electron beam experiments in the A1 area including the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3_10.png]
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.11. Figure 3.11: Differential cross sections for γn → K0Λ from MAMI A2 (black circles) plotted as a function of cos θ c.m. K for bins in W. The data are compared to results from CLAS (solid magenta and solid blue triangles) [142]. The green curves are a prediction from the partial w…
Figure 3.12
Figure 3.12. Figure 3.12: Differential cross sections for γn → K0Σ0 from MAMI A2 plotted as a function of cos θ c.m. K for bins in W [144]. The blue curve is from the isobar model of Ref. [26] and the red line is a linear fit. Figure from Ref. [144] and used with kind permission of The Europ…
Figure 3.13
Figure 3.13. Figure 3.13: (a) Schematic of the Hall A spectrometer setup showing the two identical HRS high resolution spectrometers. In this figure the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_3_13.png]
Figure 3.14
Figure 3.14. Figure 3.14: An example MM(e ′K+) spectrum from a Hall C measurement showing well separated Λ and Σ0 hyperon peaks. The vertical lines define the hyperon masses. This spectrum has been background subtracted to remove accidental coincidences and cryotarget window contributions. F…
Figure 3.15
Figure 3.15. Figure 3.15: Differential cross sections as a function of the transverse virtual photon polarization parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_3_15.png]
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.16. Figure 3.16: Charged kaon form factor vs. Q2 from JLab Hall C measurements of σL (red squares and black circles). The dashed black curve shows the monopole form factor distribution [165]; the solid blue line shows the form factor from a Dyson-Schwinger model and the dotted pink …
Figure 3.17
Figure 3.17. Figure 3.17: Schematic of the JLab hypernuclear spectroscopy configuration in Hall C. The setup consists of the HES electron arm, the HKS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_3_17.png]
Figure 3.18
Figure 3.18. Figure 3.18: Binding energy spectra for (a) 12 ΛB and (b) 10 ΛBe from the final JLab Hall C 6-GeV era experiments of the hypernuclear program. The fit functions are shown on each plot. Figures from Refs. [169] (a) and [171] (b). 3.6.2. Hall B – CLAS Photoproduction Program The l…
Figure 3.19
Figure 3.19. Figure 3.19: Schematic view of the CLAS detector with the different subsystems labeled (DC: drift chamber, SC: scintillation counters, CC: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_3_19.png]
Figure 3.20
Figure 3.20. Figure 3.20: Experimental yield distribution in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_3_20.png]
Figure 3.21
Figure 3.21. Figure 3.21: Differential cross sections for K+Λ photoproduction vs. W binned in cos θ c.m. K . The plot includes data from CLAS [88, 104] (open blue triangles, red circles), SAPHIR [82] (open green diamonds), and LEPS [123, 191] (open black circles). Figure adapted from Ref. [1…
Figure 3.22
Figure 3.22. Figure 3.22: Differential cross sections for K+Σ0 photoproduction vs. W binned in cos θ c.m. K . The plot includes data from CLAS [88, 176] (blue up-triangles, red squares), SAPHIR [82] (green down-triangles), and LEPS [122] (black circles). Figure adapted from Ref. [176]. 43 […
Figure 3.23
Figure 3.23. Figure 3.23: Recoil polarization P vs. W binned in cos θ c.m. K for K+Λ photoproduction from a proton from CLAS [104, 175] (blue triangles, red circles), SAPHIR [82] (green triangles), and GRAAL [114] (black squares). Figure adapted from Ref. [104] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 3.24
Figure 3.24. Figure 3.24: Recoil polarization P vs. W binned in cos θ c.m. K for K+Σ0 photoproduction from a proton from CLAS [175, 176] (blue up-triangles, red circles), SAPHIR [82] (green down-triangles), and GRAAL [114] (black circles). Figure adapted from Ref. [176]. 44 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE…
Figure 3.25
Figure 3.25. Figure 3.25: Cz (top) and Cx (bottom) beam-recoil hyperon transferred polarization for exclusive K+Λ production extracted from the first generation CLAS dataset (red) [179] compared to second-generation CLAS results (black) [180] as a function of W for representative cos θ c.m. …
Figure 3.26
Figure 3.26. Figure 3.26: The energy dependence of the beam asymmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_3_26.png]
Figure 3.27
Figure 3.27. Figure 3.27: The energy dependence of the beam asymmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_3_27.png]
Figure 3.28
Figure 3.28. Figure 3.28: Comparison of differential cross sections from CLAS data for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_3_28.png]
Figure 3.29
Figure 3.29. Figure 3.29: Key results from the CLAS Ξ photoproduction analyses. (a) Distribution of the MM(K+K+) events showing the exclusive reaction yields for the ground state Ξ−(1321) and first excited state Ξ−(1530). (b) Total cross section for the ground Ξ and first excited state as a …
Figure 3.30
Figure 3.30. Figure 3.30: Kinematic coverage of a CLAS 6-GeV KY electroproduction dataset in terms of (a) Q2 (GeV2 ) vs. W (GeV) and (b) cos θ c.m. K vs. Φ. The plots are overlaid with the binning choices from the analysis. Figure from Ref. [224] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_3_30.png]
Figure 3.31
Figure 3.31. Figure 3.31: Kinematics for K+Y electroproduction defining the c.m. angles and coordinate systems used to express the formalism and to present the hyperon polarization components. Here the primed coordinate system is connected to the K+ with the z ′ axis along its direction and …
Figure 3.32
Figure 3.32. Figure 3.32: Structure functions σU = σT + ϵσL, σLT, σTT, and σLT′ (nb/sr) from CLAS data for K+Λ production vs. W (GeV) for Ebeam = 5.5 GeV for Q2 = 1.80 GeV2 and cos θ c.m. K values as shown. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties only. The red curves are from …
Figure 3.33
Figure 3.33. Figure 3.33: Structure functions σU = σT + ϵσL, σLT, σTT, and σLT′ (nb/sr) from CLAS data for K+Σ0 production vs. W (GeV) for Ebeam = 5.5 GeV for Q2 = 1.80 GeV2 and cos θ c.m. K values as shown. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties only. The blue curves are fro…
Figure 3.34
Figure 3.34. Figure 3.34: Recoil hyperon polarization P0 y′ in the reaction ep → e ′K+Λ from CLAS data vs. W at an average Q2 = 1.9 GeV2 for Ebeam = 5.5 GeV and cos θ c.m. K ranges as shown. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties only. The red curves are from the isobar model…
Figure 3.35
Figure 3.35. Figure 3.35: Beam-recoil hyperon transferred polarization components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_3_35.png]
Figure 3.36
Figure 3.36. Figure 3.36: Model representation of the GlueX tagger hall and spectrometer in Hall D. The detector subsystems are labeled and outlined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_3_36.png]
Figure 3.37
Figure 3.37. Figure 3.37: The linearly polarized beam spin asymmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_3_37.png]
Figure 3.38
Figure 3.38. Figure 3.38: Spin density matrix elements ρ (ρ 0 unpolarized, ρ 1,2 polarized) as a function of four-momentum transfer squared t measured at GlueX for exclusive photoproduction of Λ(1520) [270] compared to predictions from a Regge approach [281] constrained by data from CLAS [18…
Figure 3.39
Figure 3.39. Figure 3.39: Spectroscopy studies at GlueX for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_3_39.png]
Figure 3.40
Figure 3.40. Figure 3.40: Model representation of the CLAS12 spectrometer in Hall B. The detector subsystems are labeled and outlined in the text. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_3_40.png]
Figure 3.41
Figure 3.41. Figure 3.41: Kinematic coverage of CLAS12 from data with an 11 GeV electron on a liquid-hydrogen target in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_3_41.png]
Figure 3.42
Figure 3.42. Figure 3.42: Representative K+Y polarization results from CLAS12 at 6.535 GeV for the recoil polarization P0 (middle column) [232] and for the beam-recoil transferred polarization P′ (outer columns) [289] with respect to the (x ′ , y′ , z′ ) coordinate system defined in [PITH_F…
Figure 3.43
Figure 3.43. Figure 3.43: Projections of the kinematic reach and uncertainties of the charged kaon form factor vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_3_43.png]
Figure 3.44
Figure 3.44. Figure 3.44: (a) Evolution of the K+Y cross section vs. Q2 (assuming a dipole form factor) to illustrate the kinematic range opened up by the possible energy upgrade of JLab to 22 GeV. This figure shows the rapid fall-off of the cross section at increasing Q2 that must be compen…
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Schematic representation of the γvN → N∗ electroproduction process. (a) The fully dressed γvNN∗ electrocoupling that determines the N∗ contribution to the resonant part of the meson electroproduction amplitude. (b) The contribution of the three-quark core. (c) The co…
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Quark-flow diagrams for K+ photoproduction in the semi-relativistic quark model (SRQM). Panel (a) shows the direct photon￾induced creation of an ss¯ pair, representing the seagull term, while panels (b), (c), and (d) illustrate indirect production mechanisms corre￾sp…
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: The CDM predictions for the γp → K+Λ differential cross sections compared with experimental data plotted as a function of cos θ c.m. K (a)-(d) and the photon laboratory energy (e)-(f). The differences between the solid and dashed curves illustrate the sensitivity of …
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Total cross sections vs. Elab γ predicted by the chiral quark model compared to the experimental data for the (a) γp → K+Λ and (b) γp → K+Σ0 channels. Figures from Ref. [353]. The χQM was subsequently extended to study KΣ photoproduction in all four isospin channels …
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Comparison of heavy-baryon ChPT predictions with experimental photoproduction data for the total cross sections of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_5_4.png]
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: The three possible Feynman diagrams for the electromagnetic production of kaons on the nucleon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p080_5_5.png]
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: (a) Comparison of the angular dependence of the differential cross section data with the fits of Thom. The resonant states in each fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_5_6.png]
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.7. Figure 5.7: Comparison between the fits and total cross sections of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p083_5_7.png]
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.8. Figure 5.8: (a) Results of the Renard-Renard model for the differential cross section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p084_5_8.png]
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.9. Figure 5.9: Predictions of the WJC model for the angular dependence of the differential cross section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5_9.png]
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.10. Figure 5.10: (a) Results of the WJC91 model for the angular distribution of the differential cross section of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_5_10.png]
Figure 5.11
Figure 5.11. Figure 5.11: Prediction of the SL model for the differential cross section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_5_11.png]
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.12. Figure 5.12: (a) Prediction of the SL model for the structure function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_5_12.png]
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.13. Figure 5.13: Comparison between the differential cross section data for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_5_13.png]
Figure 5.14
Figure 5.14. Figure 5.14: Total cross section data for K+Λ photoproduction on the proton as a function of the c.m. energy W. The solid green squares are the SAPHIR data [87], while the open circles show older Aachen-Berlin-Bonn-Hamburg-Heidelberg-München Collaboration data [61]. The dashed b…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The total cross sections up to energy Eγ = 2.1 GeV; lines as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_6.png]
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.16. Figure 5.16: Energy dependence of the differential cross section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_5_16.png]
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.17. Figure 5.17: (a) Comparison between the BS3 model and the differential cross section data for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p095_5_17.png]
Figure 5.18
Figure 5.18. Figure 5.18: Contributions of the rescattering terms in electromagnetic production of kaons, illustrating the Lippmann-Schwinger equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_5_18.png]
Figure 5.19
Figure 5.19. Figure 5.19: Samples of differential cross sections for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p102_5_19.png]
Figure 5.20
Figure 5.20. Figure 5.20: As in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p102_5_20.png]
Figure 5.21
Figure 5.21. Figure 5.21: (a) Selected differential cross sections for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_5_21.png]
Figure 5.22
Figure 5.22. Figure 5.22: (a) Comparison of the transferred Λ polarization components P′ x, P′ z , P′ x′ , and P′ z′ with predictions from the JBW DCC model [243] and Kaon-MAID [24]. The shaded bands connect the different solutions denoted by FIT1,...,4 to guide the eye. Predictions from Kao…
Figure 5.23
Figure 5.23. Figure 5.23: (a) Real and imaginary parts of the p → N(1440)1/2 + transition form factors at low Q2 , obtained from the JBW DCC model [465] and the ANL-Osaka model [482]. The two error bars at Q2 = 0 indicate the uncertainties of the photoproduction pole solution. (b) Transverse…
Figure 5.24
Figure 5.24. Figure 5.24: Comparison of the γp → K+Λ differential cross sections obtained from the Giessen model with experimental data from SAPHIR [82] and CLAS [175]. The solid and dashed curves correspond to fits to the CLAS (C parameter set) and SAPHIR (S parameter set) data, respectivel…
Figure 5.25
Figure 5.25. Figure 5.25: Sample of the γp → K+Λ differential cross sections vs. cos θ c.m. K for different W bins (as labeled) predicted by the KSU (solid lines) [143] and BnGa 2016 (dashed lines) [516] models. Figures adapted from Ref. [143]. Froissart bound, we refer readers to Ref. [517]…
Figure 5.26
Figure 5.26. Figure 5.26: The Chew-Frautschi plot for the K(494) and K∗(892) Regge trajectories. The mass of each particle is taken from Ref. [209]. The trajectories satisfy αK(t) = 0.64(t − m2 K) and αK∗ (t) = 1 + 0.85(t − m2 K∗ ). electroproduction reactions at forward angles are dominated…
Figure 5.27
Figure 5.27. Figure 5.27: (a) Differential cross section dσ/dt for the γp → K+Λ reaction for four photon energies as a function of the Mandelstam variable t. The solid curves show the full Reggeized K and K∗ exchanges while the dashed curves show only the contribution from K∗ exchanges. Expe…
Figure 5.28
Figure 5.28. Figure 5.28: Illustration of the Regge-plus-Resonance approach. The Feynman diagrams in this figure were generated using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p113_5_28.png]
Figure 5.29
Figure 5.29. Figure 5.29: (a) Results of the RPR-BS and RPR-BS(pv) models for the differential cross section of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_5_29.png]
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Kaon photoproduction on nuclei within the impulse approximation: (a) kaon photoproduction on the deuteron, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p116_6_1.png]
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Inclusive cross section for kaon photoproduction on the deuteron as a function of kaon laboratory momentum at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p119_6_2.png]
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: Comparison of model calculations with experimental data [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_6_3.png]
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.4. Figure 6.4: (a) Predicted masses and decay amplitudes to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p122_6_4.png]
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.5. Figure 6.5: Photon beam spin asymmetry Σ obtained from fits without (dashed blue lines) and with (solid red lines) inclusion of the SAPHIR data from Ref. [87]. Figure from Ref. [89], with color added for clarity. described within a unified algebraic framework. Within this approa…
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.6. Figure 6.6: (a) Contributions of the background and resonance terms to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p124_6_6.png]
Figure 6.7
Figure 6.7. Figure 6.7: (a) Antidecuplet of baryons predicted by the chiral soliton model [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p126_6_7.png]
Figure 6.8
Figure 6.8. Figure 6.8: Differential cross sections for η photoproduction on the proton (solid triangles) and neutron (solid circles) as a function of the total c.m. energy, obtained from (a) the photon energy (WB) and (b) reconstructed from the four-vectors of the η meson and the recoiling…
Figure 6.9
Figure 6.9. Figure 6.9: Dependence of the change of overall χ 2 on the resonance mass MR, relative elastic width Γel/Γtot, and total width Γtot for the narrow resonance P11. The two vertical arrows mark MR = 1680 and 1730 MeV. Figures from Ref. [609]. ous isobar model developed for KΛ photo…
Figure 6.10
Figure 6.10. Figure 6.10: Change of overall χ 2 as a function of the resonance mass W after the insertion of the (a) P11, (b) S11, (c) P13 resonances in Model 1 for different values of total width Γtot (from 1 to 10 MeV with 1 MeV step). Figures from Ref. [611]. The analysis method followed …
Figure 6.11
Figure 6.11. Figure 6.11: (a) Total photoabsorption cross section (solid squares) and helicity-dependent cross-section difference, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p131_6_11.png]
Figure 6.12
Figure 6.12. Figure 6.12: Total cross sections σtot (solid lines) and −σTT′ (dashed lines) as a function of the photon laboratory energy ν for the six isospin channels of kaon photoproduction. The K0Λ total cross sections are multiplied by 1/2 to fit within the same scale. Figure from Ref. […
Figure 6.13
Figure 6.13. Figure 6.13: Electromagnetic form factor of the charged kaon as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p132_6_13.png]
Figure 6.14
Figure 6.14. Figure 6.14: (a) Contribution from the t-channel diagram in pion (kaon) electroproduction. The amplitude is proportional to the propagator 1/(t − m2 ), where m is the pion (kaon) mass, and is enhanced when |t − m2 | is minimized. The electromagnetic form factors Fπ(Q2 ) and FK(Q…
Figure 6.15
Figure 6.15. Figure 6.15: Longitudinal differential cross sections for neutral kaon electroproduction, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p134_6_15.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 191 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Bennhold, T

    C. Bennhold, T. Mart, F. X. Lee, H. Haberzettl, H. Yamamura, K. Miyagawa, W. Gloeckle, S. S. Kamalov, L. Tiator, L. E. Wright, Hypernuclear Physics with Photons, in: Workshop on Hypernuclear Physics with Electromagnetic Probes (HYJLAB99), 1999.arXiv:nucl-th/0011022

    arXiv 1999

  2. [1]

    Gell-Mann, Y

    M. Gell-Mann, Y. Ne’eman (Eds.), The Eightfold Way, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000.doi:10.1201/ 9780429496615

    2000

  3. [2]

    D. J. Gross, Asymptotic Freedom, Confinement and QCD, NATO Sci. Ser. B 352 (1996) 75–99.doi:10.1007/ 978-1-4613-1147-8_7

    1996

  4. [3]

    Gross, et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur

    F. Gross, et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1125.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11949-2

    doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2023

  5. [4]

    A. J. G. Hey, R. L. Kelly, Baryon Spectroscopy, Phys. Rept. 96 (1983) 71.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90114-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90114-x 1983

  6. [5]

    D. G. Ireland, E. Pasyuk, I. Strakovsky, Photoproduction Reactions and Non-Strange Baryon Spectroscopy, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111 (2020) 103752.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103752

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Burkert, G

    V. Burkert, G. Eichmann, E. Klempt, The Impact ofγNandγ ∗NInteractions on our Understanding of Nucleon Excitations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 146 (2026) 104214.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104214

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    F. A. Berends, A. Donnachie, D. L. Weaver, Photoproduction and Electroproduction of Pions. 1. Dispersion Relation Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 4 (1967) 1–53.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(67)90196-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(67)90196-4 1967

Show all 298 references
  1. [9]

    B. B. Deo, A. K. Bisoi, Pseudoscalar Versus Pseudovector Interactions in Photoproduction and Electroproduction of Charged Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 288–295.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.288

    1974 doi

  2. [10]

    Mart, Electromagnetic Production of Kaons off the Nucleon and3He, Ph.D

    T. Mart, Electromagnetic Production of Kaons off the Nucleon and3He, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg Uni- versität Mainz (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    T. Mart, B. Van Der Ventel, Photo- and Electroproduction of the Hypertriton on3He, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 014004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014004

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    Dennery, Theory of the Electro- and Photoproduction ofπMesons, Phys

    P. Dennery, Theory of the Electro- and Photoproduction ofπMesons, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 2000–2010.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.2000

    1961 doi

  5. [13]

    Knöchlein, D

    G. Knöchlein, D. Drechsel, L. Tiator, Photoproduction and Electroproduction ofηMesons, Z. Phys. A 352 (1995) 327–343.doi:10.1007/BF01289506

    1995 doi

  6. [14]

    G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. E. Low, Y. Nambu, Relativistic Dispersion Relation Approach to Photomeson Production, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 1345–1355.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.1345

    1957 doi

  7. [15]

    Zagury, Photoproduction and Electroproduction of Pions in the Region of theN∗(1238), Phys

    N. Zagury, Photoproduction and Electroproduction of Pions in the Region of theN∗(1238), Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1112–1127.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.145.1112

    1966 doi

  8. [16]

    Drechsel, L

    D. Drechsel, L. Tiator, Threshold Pion Photoproduction on Nucleons, J. Phys. G 18 (1992) 449–497.doi:10.1088/ 0954-3899/18/3/004. 142

    1992

  9. [17]

    R. L. Walker, Phenomenological Analysis of Single Pion Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969) 1729–1748.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.182.1729

    1969 doi

  10. [18]

    N. Levy, W. Majerotto, B. J. Read, Kaon Photoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 55 (1973) 493–512.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(73)90393-3

    1973

  11. [19]

    N. Levy, W. Majerotto, B. J. Read, Kaon Electroproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 55 (1973) 513–523.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(73)90394-5

    1973

  12. [20]

    I. S. Barker, A. Donnachie, J. K. Storrow, Complete Experiments in Pseudoscalar Photoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 95 (1975) 347–356.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90049-8

    1975 doi

  13. [21]

    R. A. Adelseck, B. Saghai, Kaon Photoproduction: Data Consistency, Coupling Constants, and Polarization Ob- servables, Phys. Rev. C 42 (1990) 108–127.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.42.108

    1990 doi

  14. [22]

    Jacob, G

    M. Jacob, G. C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys. 7 (1959) 404–428. doi:10.1006/aphy.2000.6022

    1959

  15. [23]

    P. J. Bussey, et al., Polarization Parameters in Positive Pion Photoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 205–225. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90511-X

    1979 doi

  16. [24]

    T. Mart, C. Bennhold, H. Haberzettl, L. Tiator, An Effective Lagrangian Model for Kaon Photo- and Electropro- duction on the Nucleon,https://maid.kph.uni-mainz.de/kaon/, accessed on February 19, 2026

    2026

  17. [25]

    Drechsel, O

    D. Drechsel, O. Hanstein, S. S. Kamalov, L. Tiator, A Unitary Isobar Model for Pion Photoproduction and Electro- production on the Proton up to 1 GeV, Nucl. Phys. A 645 (1999) 145–174.doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00572-7

    1999 doi

  18. [26]

    Mart, Electromagnetic Production ofKΣon the Nucleon Near Threshold, Phys

    T. Mart, Electromagnetic Production ofKΣon the Nucleon Near Threshold, Phys. Rev. C 90 (6) (2014) 065202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.065202

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    J. D. Bjorken, S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, International Series In Pure and Applied Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965

    1965

  20. [28]

    Halzen, A

    F. Halzen, A. D. Martin, Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984

    1984

  21. [29]

    Donnachie, Photo and Electroproduction Processes, Vol

    A. Donnachie, Photo and Electroproduction Processes, Vol. 5, Academic Press, New York, 1972, pp. 1–185

    1972

  22. [30]

    J. J. de Swart, The Octet Model and its Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35 (1963) 916–939, [Erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 326–326 (1965)].doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.35.916

    1963 doi

  23. [31]

    J. F. Donoghue, B. R. Holstein, Evidence for SU(3) Breaking in Cabibbo Fits of Semileptonic Hyperon Decay, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2015

    1982 doi

  24. [32]

    T. Mart, C. Bennhold, C. E. Hyde-Wright, Constraints on Coupling Constants Through ChargedΣPhotoproduc- tion, Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) R1074–R1077.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.51.R1074

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    Haberzettl, C

    H. Haberzettl, C. Bennhold, T. Mart, T. Feuster, Gauge-Invariant Tree-Level Photoproduction Amplitudes with Form Factors, Phys. Rev. C 58 (1) (1998) R40–R44.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.58.R40. 143

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    Haberzettl, C

    H. Haberzettl, C. Bennhold, T. Mart, Gauge-Invariant Description of Photoproduction and Electroproduction of Mesons with Extended Nucleons Applied to Kaon Production, Nucl. Phys. A 684 (2001) 475–477.doi:10.1016/ S0375-9474(01)00510-3

    2001

  27. [35]

    Haberzettl, K

    H. Haberzettl, K. Nakayama, S. Krewald, Gauge-Invariant Approach to Meson Photoproduction Including the Final-State Interaction, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 045202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.045202

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    Haberzettl, Gauge Invariance of Meson Photo- and Electroproduction Currents Revisited, Phys

    H. Haberzettl, Gauge Invariance of Meson Photo- and Electroproduction Currents Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 056001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.056001

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Ohta, Electromagnetic Interactions of Extended Nucleons, Phys

    K. Ohta, Electromagnetic Interactions of Extended Nucleons, Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989) 1335–1346.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.40.1335

    1989

  30. [38]

    Haberzettl, Gauge Invariant Theory of Pion Photoproduction with Dressed Hadrons, Phys

    H. Haberzettl, Gauge Invariant Theory of Pion Photoproduction with Dressed Hadrons, Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 2041–2058.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.56.2041

    1997 doi

  31. [39]

    R. M. Davidson, R. Workman, Form-Factors and Photoproduction Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 025210. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.025210

    2001 doi

  32. [40]

    J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, B. R. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model: Second edition, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2022.doi:10.1017/9781009291033

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    McAleer, A Measurement of the Recoil Polarization of ElectroproducedΛ(1116), Ph.D

    S. McAleer, A Measurement of the Recoil Polarization of ElectroproducedΛ(1116), Ph.D. thesis, Florida State U. (2002).doi:10.2172/824912

    2002 doi

  34. [42]

    Crede, J

    V. Crede, J. Yelton, 70 Years of Hyperon Spectroscopy: A Review of StrangeΞ,ΩBaryons, and the Spectrum of Charmed and Bottom Baryons, Rept. Prog. Phys. 87 (10) (2024) 106301.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7610

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    G. D. Rochester, C. C. Butler, Evidence for the Existence of New Unstable Elementary Particles, Nature 160 (1947) 855–857.doi:10.1038/160855a0

    1947 doi

  36. [44]

    V. D. Hopper, S. Biswas, Evidence Concerning the Existence of the New Unstable Elementary Neutral Particle, Phys. Rev. 80 (1950) 1099–1100.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.1099

    1950 doi

  37. [45]

    C. M. York, R. B. Leighton, E. K. Bjornerud, Direct Experimental Evidence for the Existence of a Heavy Positive VParticle, Phys. Rev. 90 (1953) 167–168.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.90.167

    1953 doi

  38. [46]

    Armenteros, K

    R. Armenteros, K. Barker, C. Butler, A. Cachon, C. York, LVI. The Properties of ChargedV-Particles, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 43 (341) (1952) 597–611.doi: 10.1080/14786440608520216

    1952 doi

  39. [47]

    Anderson, et al., Cascade Decay ofVParticles, Phys

    C. Anderson, et al., Cascade Decay ofVParticles, Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 1089

    1953

  40. [48]

    W. D. Walker,Λ0 −θ 0 Production inπ−pCollisions at 1 BeV, Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 1407–1410.doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.98.1407

    1955

  41. [49]

    Gell-Mann, A

    M. Gell-Mann, A. Pais, Behavior of Neutral Particles Under Charge Conjugation, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 1387–1389. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.97.1387. 144

    1955 doi

  42. [50]

    Venanzoni, Discovery of Strangeness (1943-1959); Presented as a seminar to the Muon Group, Liverpool - Apr

    G. Venanzoni, Discovery of Strangeness (1943-1959); Presented as a seminar to the Muon Group, Liverpool - Apr. 29, 2024,https://indico.ph.liv.ac.uk/event/1621/(2024)

    1943

  43. [51]

    G. T. Mulholland, G. G. Harigel, Liquid Hydrogen: Target, Detector, AIP Conf. Proc. 710 (2004) 16–26.doi: 10.1063/1.1774662

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    P. L. Donoho, R. L. Walker, Photoproduction ofK+ Mesons in Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 981–986.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.112.981

    1958 doi

  45. [53]

    D. E. Groom, J. H. Marshall,ΛPolarization at 90◦ inK +ΛPhotoproduction, Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1213–1219. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.1213

    1967 doi

  46. [54]

    C. J. Bebek, A. Browman, C. N. Brown, K. M. Hanson, R. V. Kline, D. Larson, F. M. Pipkin, S. W. Raither, A. Silverman, L. K. Sisterson, Scalar-Transverse Separation of ElectroproducedK +ΛandK +Σ0 Final States, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 3082.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.3082

    1977 doi

  47. [55]

    Abe, et al., Inclusive Photoproduction of Strange Baryons at 20 GeV, Phys

    K. Abe, et al., Inclusive Photoproduction of Strange Baryons at 20 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 2869–2882. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2869

    1985 doi

  48. [56]

    B. D. McDaniel, A. Silverman, R. R. Wilson, G. Cortellessa, Photoproduction ofKMesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 (1958) 109–111.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.1.109

    1958 doi

  49. [57]

    B. D. McDaniel, A. Silverman, R. R. Wilson, G. Cortellessa, Photoproduction ofK+ Mesons, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1039–1048.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.1039

    1959 doi

  50. [58]

    R.L.Anderson, E.Gabathuler, D.Jones, B.D.McDaniel, A.J.Sadoff, PhotoproductionofK + MesonsinHydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 (1962) 131–133.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.131

    1962 doi

  51. [59]

    C. W. Peck,K+ΛPhotoproduction from Hydrogen at 1200 MeV, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B830–B838.doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.135.B830

    1964

  52. [60]

    Erbe, et al., Photoproduction of Strange Particles at Energies up to 5.8 GeV, Nuovo Cim

    R. Erbe, et al., Photoproduction of Strange Particles at Energies up to 5.8 GeV, Nuovo Cim. A 49 (1967) 504. doi:10.1393/ncc/i2024-24208-7

    1967 doi

  53. [61]

    Erbe, et al., Multipion and Strange-Particle Photoproduction on Protons at Energies up to 5.8 GeV, Phys

    R. Erbe, et al., Multipion and Strange-Particle Photoproduction on Protons at Energies up to 5.8 GeV, Phys. Rev. 188 (1969) 2060–2077.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.188.2060

    1969 doi

  54. [62]

    Boyarski, F

    A. Boyarski, F. Bulos, W. Busza, R. E. Diebold, S. D. Ecklund, G. E. Fischer, Y. Murata, J. R. Rees, B. Richter, W. S. C. Williams, Photoproduction ofK+ΛandK +Σ0 from Hydrogen from 5 GeV to 16 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 1131–1133.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.1131

    1969 doi

  55. [63]

    Boyarski, R

    A. Boyarski, R. E. Diebold, S. D. Ecklund, G. E. Fischer, Y. Murata, B. Richter, M. Sands, Photoproduction ofK+ Hyperon from Hydrogen and Deuterium at 11 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 34 (1971) 547–550.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(71) 90677-0

    1971 doi

  56. [64]

    R. L. Anderson, D. Gustavson, D. Ritson, G. A. Weitsch, H. J. Halpern, R. Prepost, D. H. Tompkins, D. E. Wiser, Measurements of Exclusive Photoproduction Processes at Large Values oftandufrom 4 GeV to 7.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 679.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.679. 145

    1976 doi

  57. [65]

    Abe, et al., Inclusive Photoproduction of Neutral Strange Particles at 20 GeV, Phys

    K. Abe, et al., Inclusive Photoproduction of Neutral Strange Particles at 20 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 1877. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1877

    1984 doi

  58. [66]

    Bleckmann, S

    A. Bleckmann, S. Herda, U. Opara, W. Schulz, W. J. Schwille, H. Urbahn, Photoproduction ofK+ΛandK +Σ0 from Hydrogen Between 1.3 and 1.45 GeV, Z. Phys. 239 (1970) 1–15.doi:10.1007/BF01408507

    1970 doi

  59. [67]

    Feller, D

    P. Feller, D. Menze, U. Opara, W. Schulz, W. J. Schwille, Photoproduction ofK+Λ0 andK +Σ0 from Hydrogen at Constant Momentum TransfertBetween 1.05 and 2.2 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 39 (1972) 413–420.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(72)90379-3

    1972

  60. [68]

    D. P. Barber, et al., Strangeness Exchange in the Photoproduction ofK+Λ(1520)Between 2.8 GeV and 4.8 GeV, Z. Phys. C 7 (1980) 17.doi:10.1007/BF01577315

    1980 doi

  61. [69]

    B. D. McDaniel, P. Joos, D. McLeod, S. Richert, D. Zipoy, Polarization ofΛ0 from Photoproduction in Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (1960) 33–35.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.33

    1960 doi

  62. [70]

    H. Thom, E. Gabathuler, D. Jones, B. D. McDaniel, W. M. Woodward, Polarization ofΛHyperons from Photo- production in Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11 (1963) 433–435.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.433

    1963 doi

  63. [71]

    Borgia, M

    B. Borgia, M. Grilli, P. Joos, L. Mezzetti, M. Nigro, E. Schiavuta, F. Villa,Λ0 Polarization from the Reaction γ+p→K ++Λ0 in theEnergy Range 950–1050MeV, Nuovo Cim. 32(1) (1964)218–223.doi:10.1007/BF02732605

    1964 doi

  64. [72]

    Grilli, L

    M. Grilli, L. Mezzetti, M. Nigro, E. Schiavuta,Λ0-Polarization from the Reactionγ+p→Λ 0 +K + in the Energy Range (950÷1050) MeV, Nuovo Cim. 38 (4) (1965) 1467–1488.doi:10.1007/BF02750071

    1965 doi

  65. [73]

    R. Haas, T. Miczaika, U. Opara, K. Quabach, W. J. Schwille, Measurement of the Polarization of theΛ0 in the Reactionγp→K +Λ0 in the Resonance Region, Nucl. Phys. B 137 (1978) 261–268.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78) 90519-9

    1978 doi

  66. [74]

    K. H. Althoff, et al., Photoproduction ofK+Λ0 on Polarized Protons, Nucl. Phys. B 137 (1978) 269–275.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(78)90520-5

    1978 doi

  67. [75]

    C. N. Brown, et al., Coincidence Measurements of SingleK+ Electroproduction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 1086– 1089.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1086

    1972 doi

  68. [76]

    C. J. Bebek, et al., Electroproduction ofK+ Mesons in the Forward Direction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 21–24. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.21

    1974 doi

  69. [77]

    C. J. Bebek, C. N. Brown, P. Bucksbaum, M. Herzlinger, S. D. Holmes, C. A. Lichtenstein, F. M. Pipkin, S. W. Raither, L. K. Sisterson, Electroproduction ofK+ Mesons Along the Virtual Photon Direction, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 594.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.594

    1977 doi

  70. [78]

    Azemoon, I

    T. Azemoon, I. Dammann, C. Driver, D. Luke, G. Specht, K. Heinloth, H. Ackermann, E. Ganssauge, F. Janata, D. Schmidt, Production of Hyperons by Virtual Photons, Nucl. Phys. B 95 (1975) 77–97.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(75)90481-2. 146

    1975

  71. [79]

    Brauel, T

    P. Brauel, T. Canzler, D. Cords, R. Felst, G. Grindhammer, M. Helm, W. D. Kollmann, H. Krehbiel, M. Schadlich, Electroproduction ofπ +n,π −pandK +Λ,K +Σ0 Final States Above the Resonance Region, Z. Phys. C 3 (1979) 101.doi:10.1007/BF01443698

    1979 doi

  72. [80]

    Gourdin, J

    M. Gourdin, J. Dufour, Photoproduction of Strange Particles, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 27 (6) (1963) 1410– 1430.doi:10.1007/BF02785636

    1955 doi

  73. [81]

    Hillert, The Bonn Electron Stretcher Accelerator ELSA: Past and Future, Eur

    W. Hillert, The Bonn Electron Stretcher Accelerator ELSA: Past and Future, Eur. Phys. J. A 28S1 (2006) 139–148. doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-09-015-4

    2006 doi

  74. [82]

    K. H. Glander, et al., Measurement ofγp→K+Λandγp→K +Σ0 at Photon Energies up to 2.6 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 19 (2004) 251–273.doi:10.1140/epja/i2003-10119-x

    2004 doi

  75. [83]

    Seifen, et al., Polarization Observables in Double Neutral Pion Photoproduction, Eur

    T. Seifen, et al., Polarization Observables in Double Neutral Pion Photoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. A 61 (7) (2025) 173.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01612-7

    2025 doi

  76. [85]

    W. J. Schwille, et al., Design and Construction of the SAPHIR Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 344 (1994) 470–486.doi:10.1016/0168-9002(94)90868-0

    1994 doi

  77. [86]

    K. H. Glander, Kaon Photoproduction at SAPHIR for Photon Energies up to 2.6 GeV, Nucl. Phys. A 754 (2005) 294–302.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.160

    2005 doi

  78. [87]

    M. Q. Tran, et al., Measurement ofγp→K +Λandγp→K +Σ0 at Photon Energies up to 2 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 20–26.doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01393-8

    1998 doi

  79. [88]

    Bradford, et al., Differential Cross Sections forγ+p→K+ +YforΛandΣ 0 Hyperons, Phys

    R. Bradford, et al., Differential Cross Sections forγ+p→K+ +YforΛandΣ 0 Hyperons, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 035202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.035202

    2006 doi

  80. [89]

    T. Mart, C. Bennhold, Evidence for a Missing Nucleon Resonance in Kaon Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 61 (1999) 012201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.61.012201

    1999 doi

  81. [90]

    J. C. David, C. Fayard, G. H. Lamot, B. Saghai, Electromagnetic Production of Associated Strangeness, Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) 2613–2637.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.53.2613

    1996 doi

  82. [91]

    Guidal, J

    M. Guidal, J. M. Laget, M. Vanderhaeghen, Electroproduction of Strangeness above the Resonance Region, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 025204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.61.025204

    2000 doi

  83. [92]

    Aker, et al., The Crystal Barrel Spectrometer at LEAR, Nucl

    E. Aker, et al., The Crystal Barrel Spectrometer at LEAR, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 321 (1992) 69–108.doi: 10.1016/0168-9002(92)90379-I

    1992 doi

  84. [94]

    Novotny, The BaF2 Photon Spectrometer TAPS, IEEE Trans

    R. Novotny, The BaF2 Photon Spectrometer TAPS, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38 (1991) 379–385.doi:10.1109/23. 289329. 147

    1991 doi

  85. [95]

    J.Hartmann, BaryonSpectroscopy-RecentResultsfromtheCBELSA/TAPSExperiment, AIPConf.Proc.1735(1) (2016) 040011.doi:10.1063/1.4949415

    2016 doi

  86. [96]

    Ewald, et al., Anomaly in theK0 SΣ+ Photoproduction Cross Section off the Proton at theK∗ Threshold, Phys

    R. Ewald, et al., Anomaly in theK0 SΣ+ Photoproduction Cross Section off the Proton at theK∗ Threshold, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 180–185.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.066

    2012 doi

  87. [97]

    Ewald, et al., Measurement of Polarisation Observables inK0 SΣ+ Photoproduction off the Proton, Phys

    R. Ewald, et al., Measurement of Polarisation Observables inK0 SΣ+ Photoproduction off the Proton, Phys. Lett. B 738 (2014) 268–273.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.039

    2014 doi

  88. [98]

    T. C. Jude, Studies of Unconventional Baryon Structure in the Light Quark Sector with the BGOOD Photopro- duction Experiment, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 147 (2026) 104224.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104224

    2026

  89. [99]

    T. C. Jude, et al., Strangeness Photoproduction at the BGO-OD Experiment, Phys. Part. Nucl. 50 (5) (2019) 493–500, [Erratum: Phys. Part. Nucl. 51, 122 (2020)].doi:10.1134/S1063779619050113

    2019 doi

  90. [100]

    Alef, et al.,K +ΛPhotoproduction at Forward Angles and Low Momentum Transfer, Eur

    S. Alef, et al.,K +ΛPhotoproduction at Forward Angles and Low Momentum Transfer, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2) (2021) 80.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00392-0

    2021 doi

  91. [101]

    T. C. Jude, et al., Observation of a Cusp-Like Structure in theγp→K+Σ0 Cross Section at Forward Angles and Low Momentum Transfer, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136559.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136559

    2021

  92. [102]

    Scheluchin, et al., Photoproduction ofK+Λ(1405)→K +π0Σ0 extending to forward angles and low momentum transfer, Phys

    G. Scheluchin, et al., Photoproduction ofK+Λ(1405)→K +π0Σ0 extending to forward angles and low momentum transfer, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137375.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137375

    2022

  93. [103]

    E. O. Rosanowski, et al.,K +Λ(1520)Photoproduction at Forward Angles Near Threshold with the BGOOD Experiment, Eur. Phys. J. A 61 (6) (2025) 147.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01613-6

    2025 doi

  94. [104]

    M. E. McCracken, et al., Differential Cross Section and Recoil Polarization Measurements for theγp→K +Λ Reaction Using CLAS at Jefferson Lab, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 025201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.025201

    2010 doi

  95. [105]

    S. H. Shiu, et al., Photoproduction ofΛandΣ 0 Hyperons off Protons with Linearly Polarized Photons atEγ = 1.5−3.0GeV, Phys. Rev. C 97 (1) (2018) 015208.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.015208

    2018 doi

  96. [106]

    Sumihama, et al., The⃗ γp→K+Λand⃗ γp→K +Σ0 Reactions at Forward Angles with Photon Energies from 1.5 GeV to 2.4 GeV, Phys

    M. Sumihama, et al., The⃗ γp→K+Λand⃗ γp→K +Σ0 Reactions at Forward Angles with Photon Energies from 1.5 GeV to 2.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 035214.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.035214

    2006 doi

  97. [107]

    Bydžovský, D

    P. Bydžovský, D. Skoupil, Photoproduction ofK+Λwith a Regge-Plus-Resonance Model, Phys. Rev. C 100 (3) (2019) 035202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.035202

    2019 doi

  98. [108]

    Skoupil, P

    D. Skoupil, P. Bydžovský, Photoproduction ofKΛon the Proton, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2) (2016) 025204.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.025204

    2016 doi

  99. [109]

    Skoupil, P

    D. Skoupil, P. Bydžovský, Photo- and Electroproduction ofK+Λwith Unitarity-Restored Isobar Model, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2) (2018) 025202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.025202

    2018 doi

  100. [110]

    Müller, et al., New Data on⃗ γ⃗ p→ηpwith Polarized Photons and Protons and Their Implications forN∗ →N η Decays, Phys

    J. Müller, et al., New Data on⃗ γ⃗ p→ηpwith Polarized Photons and Protons and Their Implications forN∗ →N η Decays, Phys. Lett. B 803 (2020) 135323.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135323. 148

    2020

  101. [111]

    J. P. Bocquet, et al., GRAAL: A Polarized Gamma-Ray Beam at ESRF, Nucl. Phys. A 622 (1997) 124c–129c. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00337-0

    1997 doi

  102. [112]

    N. T. Ouellette, H. Xu, E. Bodenschatz, A Quantitative Study of Three-Dimensional Lagrangian Particle Tracking Algorithms, Exp. Fluids 40 (2006) 301–313.doi:10.1007/s00348-005-0068-7

    2006 doi

  103. [113]

    Ghio, et al., The GRAAL High Resolution BGO Calorimeter and its Energy Calibration and Monitoring System, Nucl

    F. Ghio, et al., The GRAAL High Resolution BGO Calorimeter and its Energy Calibration and Monitoring System, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 404 (1998) 71–86.doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(97)01124-8

    1998 doi

  104. [114]

    Lleres, et al., Polarization Observable Measurements forγp→K +Λandγp→K +Σ0 for Energies up to 1.5 GeV, Eur

    A. Lleres, et al., Polarization Observable Measurements forγp→K +Λandγp→K +Σ0 for Energies up to 1.5 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 31 (2007) 79–93.doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10167-8

    2007 doi

  105. [115]

    Lleres, et al., Measurement of Beam-Recoil ObservablesOx,O z and Target Asymmetry for the Reactionγp→ K +Λ, Eur

    A. Lleres, et al., Measurement of Beam-Recoil ObservablesOx,O z and Target Asymmetry for the Reactionγp→ K +Λ, Eur. Phys. J. A 39 (2009) 149–161.doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10713-4

    2009 doi

  106. [116]

    Chiang, F

    W.-T. Chiang, F. Tabakin, Completeness Rules for Spin Observables in Pseudoscalar Meson Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 2054–2066.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2054

    1997 doi

  107. [117]

    A. M. Sandorfi, S. Hoblit, H. Kamano, T. S. H. Lee, Determining Pseudoscalar Meson Photo-Production Amplitudes from Complete Experiments, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 053001.doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/5/053001

    2011 doi

  108. [118]

    J. P. Bocquet, et al., Strangeness Photoproduction at GRAAL, Nucl. Phys. A 691 (2001) 466–472.doi:10.1016/ S0375-9474(01)01075-2

    2001

  109. [119]

    Fujiwara, T

    M. Fujiwara, T. Hotta, T. Kinashi, K. Takanashi, T. Nakano, Y. Ohashi, S. Date, H. Ohkuma, N. Kumagai, Physics with Polarized Photons at SPring-8, Acta Phys. Polon. B 29 (1998) 141–156. URLhttps://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/R/29/1/141

    1998

  110. [120]

    Nakano, et al., Experiment at SPring-8, Nucl

    T. Nakano, et al., Experiment at SPring-8, Nucl. Phys. A 670 (2000) 332–339.doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(00) 00124-X

    2000 doi

  111. [121]

    Muramatsu, Overview of Hadron Photoproduction Experiments in SPring-8 LEPS2 Project, EPJ Web Conf

    N. Muramatsu, Overview of Hadron Photoproduction Experiments in SPring-8 LEPS2 Project, EPJ Web Conf. 291 (2024) 01009.doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429101009

    2024

  112. [122]

    Kohri, et al., Differential Cross Section and Photon Beam Asymmetry for the⃗ γn→K+Σ− reaction atE γ = 1.5 GeV - 2.4 GeV, Phys

    H. Kohri, et al., Differential Cross Section and Photon Beam Asymmetry for the⃗ γn→K+Σ− reaction atE γ = 1.5 GeV - 2.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 082003.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.082003

    2006 doi

  113. [123]

    Hicks, et al., Measurement of the⃗ γp→K+ΛReaction at Backward angles, Phys

    K. Hicks, et al., Measurement of the⃗ γp→K+ΛReaction at Backward angles, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 042201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.042201

    2007 doi

  114. [124]

    R. G. T. Zegers, et al., Beam Polarization Asymmetries for thep(γ, K+)Λandp(γ, K +)Σ0 Reactions atE γ = 1.5 GeV - 2.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 092001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.092001

    2003 doi

  115. [125]

    A. O. Tokiyasu, et al., Search forK−ppBound State viaγd→K +π−XReaction atE γ = 1.5−2.4GeV, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 616–621.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.12.039

    2014 doi

  116. [126]

    Hwang, K

    S. Hwang, K. Hicks, J. K. Ahn, T. Nakano,K∗0Σ+ Photoproduction with Evidence for theκMeson Exchange at SPring-8/LEPS, Few Body Syst. 54 (2013) 1037–1041.doi:10.1007/s00601-013-0650-0. 149

    2013 doi

  117. [127]

    S. H. Hwang, et al., Spin-Density Matrix Elements forγp→K∗0Σ+ atE γ = 1.85−3.0GeV with Evidence for the κ(800)Meson Exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 092001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.092001

    2012 doi

  118. [128]

    Nakano, Status of theΘ+ analysis at LEPS, Nucl

    T. Nakano, Status of theΘ+ analysis at LEPS, Nucl. Phys. A 835 (2010) 254–260.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa. 2010.01.200

    2010 doi

  119. [129]

    Matsumura, et al., The Performance Study of an Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter for the LEPS2/BGOegg Exper- iment, JPS Conf

    Y. Matsumura, et al., The Performance Study of an Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter for the LEPS2/BGOegg Exper- iment, JPS Conf. Proc. 10 (2016) 032011.doi:10.7566/JPSCP.10.032011

    2016 doi

  120. [130]

    Niiyama, Status and Prospects of LEPS2 Solenoid Spectrometer, JPS Conf

    M. Niiyama, Status and Prospects of LEPS2 Solenoid Spectrometer, JPS Conf. Proc. 13 (2017) 020009.doi: 10.7566/JPSCP.13.020009

    2017 doi

  121. [131]

    K. H. Kaiser, et al., The 1.5 GeV Harmonic Double-Sided Microtron at Mainz University, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 593 (2008) 159–170.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.018

    2008 doi

  122. [132]

    K. I. Blomqvist, et al., The Three-Spectrometer Facility at the Mainz Microtron MAMI, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 403 (1998) 263–301.doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(97)01133-9

    1998 doi

  123. [133]

    Esser, et al., Prospects for Hypernuclear Physics at Mainz: From KAOS@MAMI to PANDA@FAIR, Nucl

    A. Esser, et al., Prospects for Hypernuclear Physics at Mainz: From KAOS@MAMI to PANDA@FAIR, Nucl. Phys. A 914 (2013) 519–529.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.008

    2013 doi

  124. [134]

    Achenbach, et al., Recent Studies of Hypernuclei Formation with Electron Beams at MAMI, Few Body Syst

    P. Achenbach, et al., Recent Studies of Hypernuclei Formation with Electron Beams at MAMI, Few Body Syst. 55 (8-10) (2014) 887–892.doi:10.1007/s00601-013-0777-z

    2014 doi

  125. [135]

    Esser, et al., Observation of4 ΛH Hyperhydrogen by Decay-Pion Spectroscopy in Electron Scattering, Phys

    A. Esser, et al., Observation of4 ΛH Hyperhydrogen by Decay-Pion Spectroscopy in Electron Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (23) (2015) 232501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.232501

    2015 doi

  126. [136]

    Achenbach, et al., Overview of the Electromagnetic Production of Strange Mesons at MAMI, Nucl

    P. Achenbach, et al., Overview of the Electromagnetic Production of Strange Mesons at MAMI, Nucl. Phys. A 914 (2013) 41–50.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.01.019

    2013 doi

  127. [137]

    Achenbach, AssociatedΛ/Σ0 Electroproduction with the Kaos Spectrometer at MAMI, EPJ Web Conf

    P. Achenbach, AssociatedΛ/Σ0 Electroproduction with the Kaos Spectrometer at MAMI, EPJ Web Conf. 3 (2010) 07010.doi:10.1051/epjconf/20100307010

    2010

  128. [138]

    Achenbach, et al., Beam Helicity Asymmetries inK+ΛElectroproduction off the Proton at lowQ2, Eur

    P. Achenbach, et al., Beam Helicity Asymmetries inK+ΛElectroproduction off the Proton at lowQ2, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (10) (2017) 198.doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12395-1

    2017 doi

  129. [139]

    Neiser, Current Status and Performance of the Crystal Ball and TAPS Calorimeter, J

    A. Neiser, Current Status and Performance of the Crystal Ball and TAPS Calorimeter, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 587 (1) (2015) 012041.doi:10.1088/1742-6596/587/1/012041

    2015 doi

  130. [140]

    E. D. Bloom, C. Peck, Physics with the Crystal Ball Detector, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 33 (1983) 143–197. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.33.120183.001043

    1983

  131. [141]

    Adlarson, et al., Measurement of theπ0 →e +e−γDalitz decay at the Mainz Microtron, Phys

    P. Adlarson, et al., Measurement of theπ0 →e +e−γDalitz decay at the Mainz Microtron, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2) (2017) 025202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025202

    2017 doi

  132. [142]

    Compton, et al., Measurement of the Differential and Total Cross Sections of theγd→K0Λ(p)Reaction Within the Resonance Region, Phys

    N. Compton, et al., Measurement of the Differential and Total Cross Sections of theγd→K0Λ(p)Reaction Within the Resonance Region, Phys. Rev. C 96 (6) (2017) 065201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.065201. 150

    2017 doi

  133. [143]

    B. C. Hunt, D. M. Manley, Partial-Wave Analysis ofγp→K +Λusing a multichannel framework, Phys. Rev. C 99 (5) (2019) 055204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.055204

    2019 doi

  134. [144]

    C. S. Akondi, et al., Experimental Study of theγp→K0Σ+,γn→K 0Λ, andγn→K 0Σ0 Reactions at the Mainz Microtron, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) (2019) 202.doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12924-x

    2019 doi

  135. [145]

    Aguar-Bartolome, et al., Measurement of theγp→K 0Σ+ Reaction with the Crystal Ball/TAPS Detectors at the Mainz Microtron, Phys

    P. Aguar-Bartolome, et al., Measurement of theγp→K 0Σ+ Reaction with the Crystal Ball/TAPS Detectors at the Mainz Microtron, Phys. Rev. C 88 (4) (2013) 044601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044601

    2013 doi

  136. [146]

    T. C. Jude, et al.,K+ΛandK +Σ0 Photoproduction with Fine Center-of-Mass Energy Resolution, Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 112–118.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.015

    2014 doi

  137. [147]

    Bockhorst, et al., Measurement ofγp→K +Λandγp→K +Σ0 at Photon Energies up to 1.47 GeV, Z

    M. Bockhorst, et al., Measurement ofγp→K +Λandγp→K +Σ0 at Photon Energies up to 1.47 GeV, Z. Phys. C 63 (1994) 37–47.doi:10.1007/BF01577542

    1994 doi

  138. [148]

    Goers, et al., Measurement ofγp→K0Σ+ at Photon Energies up to 1.55 GeV, Phys

    S. Goers, et al., Measurement ofγp→K0Σ+ at Photon Energies up to 1.55 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 464 (1999) 331–338. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01031-X

    1999 doi

  139. [149]

    Lawall, et al., Measurement of the Reactionγp→K0Σ+ at Photon Energies up to 2.6 GeV, Eur

    R. Lawall, et al., Measurement of the Reactionγp→K0Σ+ at Photon Energies up to 2.6 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 24 (2005) 275–286.doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10002-x

    2005 doi

  140. [150]

    Muramatsu, et al., Near-Threshold Photoproduction ofΛ(1520)from Protons and Deuterons, Phys

    N. Muramatsu, et al., Near-Threshold Photoproduction ofΛ(1520)from Protons and Deuterons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 012001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.012001

    2009 doi

  141. [151]

    Kohri, et al., Near-ThresholdΛ(1520)Production by the⃗ γp→K +Λ(1520)Reaction at ForwardK + Angles, Phys

    H. Kohri, et al., Near-ThresholdΛ(1520)Production by the⃗ γp→K +Λ(1520)Reaction at ForwardK + Angles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 172001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.172001

    2010 doi

  142. [152]

    Kohl, et al., Measurement of theγn→K0Σ0 Differential Cross Section over theK∗ Threshold, Eur

    K. Kohl, et al., Measurement of theγn→K0Σ0 Differential Cross Section over theK∗ Threshold, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) (2023) 254.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01133-1

    2023 doi

  143. [153]

    Kanda, et al., Strangeness Photoproduction Experiments at SENDAI, Nucl

    H. Kanda, et al., Strangeness Photoproduction Experiments at SENDAI, Nucl. Phys. A 835 (2010) 317–320.doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.01.208

    2010 doi

  144. [154]

    C. W. Leemann, D. R. Douglas, G. A. Krafft, The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility: CEBAF at the Jefferson Laboratory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51 (2001) 413–450.doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.51.101701. 132327

    2001 doi

  145. [155]

    Alcorn, et al., Basic Instrumentation for Hall A at Jefferson Lab, Nucl

    J. Alcorn, et al., Basic Instrumentation for Hall A at Jefferson Lab, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 522 (2004) 294–346. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.415

    2004 doi

  146. [156]

    Domingo, R

    J. Domingo, R. Carlini, B. Mecking, J. Mougey, The CEBAF Experimental Equipment, AIP Conf. Proc. 269 (1992) 25–79.doi:10.1063/1.42980

    1992 doi

  147. [157]

    M. N. Rosenbluth, High Energy Elastic Scattering of Electrons on Protons, Phys. Rev. 79 (1950) 615–619.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.79.615

    1950 doi

  148. [158]

    R. A. Williams, C. R. Ji, S. R. Cotanch, Hyperon Electroproduction in a Crossing and Duality Constrained Model, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 1617–1635.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.46.1617. 151

    1992 doi

  149. [159]

    Niculescu, et al., Longitudinal and Transverse Cross-Sections in the1H(e, e′K +)ΛReaction, Phys

    G. Niculescu, et al., Longitudinal and Transverse Cross-Sections in the1H(e, e′K +)ΛReaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1805–1808.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1805

    1998 doi

  150. [160]

    R. M. Mohring, et al., Separation of the Longitudinal and Transverse Cross-Sections in thep(e, e ′K +)Λand p(e, e′K +)Σ0 Reactions, Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 055205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.055205

    2003 doi

  151. [161]

    Coman, et al., Cross Sections and Rosenbluth Separations in1H(e, e′K +)Λup toQ 2 = 2.35GeV 2, Phys

    M. Coman, et al., Cross Sections and Rosenbluth Separations in1H(e, e′K +)Λup toQ 2 = 2.35GeV 2, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 052201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.052201

    2010 doi

  152. [162]

    Carmignotto, et al., Separated Kaon Electroproduction Cross Section and the Kaon Form Factor from 6 GeV JLab Data, Phys

    M. Carmignotto, et al., Separated Kaon Electroproduction Cross Section and the Kaon Form Factor from 6 GeV JLab Data, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2) (2018) 025204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.025204

    2018 doi

  153. [163]

    Vanderhaeghen, M

    M. Vanderhaeghen, M. Guidal, J. M. Laget, Regge Description of Charged Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction above the Resonance Region, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 1454–1457.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1454

    1998 doi

  154. [164]

    G. M. Huber, et al., Studies of the L-T Separated Kaon Electroproduction Cross Section from 5-11 GeV, Ap- proved Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Experiment E12-09-011,https://misportal.jlab.org/mis/physics/experiments/ viewProposal.cfm?paperId=613(2006)

    2006

  155. [165]

    S. R. Amendolia, et al., A Measurement of the Kaon Charge Radius, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 435–440.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91407-3

    1986 doi

  156. [166]

    F. Gao, L. Chang, Y.-X. Liu, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, Exposing Strangeness: Projections for Kaon Electromag- netic Form Factors, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) (2017) 034024.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034024

    2017 doi

  157. [167]

    Miyoshi, et al., High Resolution Spectroscopy of the12 ΛBHypernucleus Produced by the(e, e ′K +)Reaction, Phys

    T. Miyoshi, et al., High Resolution Spectroscopy of the12 ΛBHypernucleus Produced by the(e, e ′K +)Reaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 232502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.232502

    2003 doi

  158. [168]

    Yuan, et al., Hypernuclear Spectroscopy Using the(e, e′K +)Reaction, Phys

    L. Yuan, et al., Hypernuclear Spectroscopy Using the(e, e′K +)Reaction, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 044607.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044607

    2006 doi

  159. [169]

    Tang, et al., Experiments with the High Resolution Kaon Spectrometer at JLab Hall C and the New spectroscopy of 12 ΛBHypernuclei, Phys

    L. Tang, et al., Experiments with the High Resolution Kaon Spectrometer at JLab Hall C and the New spectroscopy of 12 ΛBHypernuclei, Phys. Rev. C 90 (3) (2014) 034320.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.034320

    2014 doi

  160. [170]

    H. Le, J. Haidenbauer, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nogga, LightΛHypernuclei Studied with Chiral Hyperon-Nucleon and Hyperon-Nucleon-NucleonForces, Phys.Rev.Lett.134(7)(2025)072502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.072502

    2025 doi

  161. [171]

    Gogami, et al., High Resolution Spectroscopic Study of10 ΛBe, Phys

    T. Gogami, et al., High Resolution Spectroscopic Study of10 ΛBe, Phys. Rev. C 93 (3) (2016) 034314.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.93.034314

    2016

  162. [172]

    B. A. Mecking, et al., The CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 503 (2003) 513–553.doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01001-5

    2003 doi

  163. [173]

    D. S. Carman, et al., Beam-Recoil Polarization Transfer in the Nucleon Resonance Region in the Exclusive⃗ ep→ e′K +⃗Λand⃗ ep→e′K +⃗Σ0 Reactions at CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 065205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.065205

    2009 doi

  164. [174]

    D. I. Sober, et al., The Bremsstrahlung Tagged Photon Beam in Hall B at JLab, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 440 (2000) 263–284.doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00784-6. 152

    2000 doi

  165. [175]

    J. W. C. McNabb, et al., Hyperon Photoproduction in the Nucleon Resonance Region, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 042201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.042201

    2004 doi

  166. [176]

    Dey, et al., Differential Cross Sections and Recoil Polarizations for the Reactionγp→K+Σ0, Phys

    B. Dey, et al., Differential Cross Sections and Recoil Polarizations for the Reactionγp→K+Σ0, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 025202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.025202

    2010 doi

  167. [177]

    C. S. Nepali, et al., Transverse Polarization ofΣ+(1189) in Photoproduction on a Hydrogen Target in CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 87 (4) (2013) 045206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.045206

    2013 doi

  168. [178]

    Clark, et al., Photoproduction of theΣ+ Hyperon Using Linearly Polarized Photons with CLAS, Phys

    L. Clark, et al., Photoproduction of theΣ+ Hyperon Using Linearly Polarized Photons with CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 111 (2) (2025) 025204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.025204

    2025 doi

  169. [179]

    R. K. Bradford, et al., First Measurement of Beam-Recoil ObservablesCx andC z in Hyperon Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 035205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.035205

    2007 doi

  170. [180]

    Adhikari, et al., Measurement of Beam-Recoil ObservablesCx andC z forK +ΛPhotoproduction, Phys

    S. Adhikari, et al., Measurement of Beam-Recoil ObservablesCx andC z forK +ΛPhotoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 112 (6) (2025) 065211.doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/1q5m-x849

    2025 doi

  171. [181]

    C. A. Paterson, et al., Photoproduction ofΛandΣ 0 Hyperons Using Linearly Polarized Photons, Phys. Rev. C 93 (6) (2016) 065201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.065201

    2016 doi

  172. [182]

    S. A. Pereira, et al., Differential Cross Section ofγn→K+Σ− on Bound Neutrons with Incident Photons from 1.1 to 3.6 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 289–293.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.04.028

    2010 doi

  173. [183]

    Zachariou, et al., Beam-Spin AsymmetryΣforΣ− Hyperon Photoproduction off the Neutron, Phys

    N. Zachariou, et al., Beam-Spin AsymmetryΣforΣ− Hyperon Photoproduction off the Neutron, Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022) 136985.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136985

    2022

  174. [184]

    D. H. Ho, et al., Beam-Target Helicity AsymmetryEinK 0ΛandK 0Σ0 Photoproduction on the Neutron, Phys. Rev. C 98 (4) (2018) 045205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.045205

    2018 doi

  175. [185]

    Zachariou, et al., Beam-Target Helicity AsymmetryEinK +Σ− Photoproduction on the Neutron, Phys

    N. Zachariou, et al., Beam-Target Helicity AsymmetryEinK +Σ− Photoproduction on the Neutron, Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135662.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135662

    2020

  176. [186]

    Hleiqawi, et al., Cross-Sections for theγp→K∗0Σ+ Reaction atE γ = 1.7 GeV - 3.0 GeV, Phys

    I. Hleiqawi, et al., Cross-Sections for theγp→K∗0Σ+ Reaction atE γ = 1.7 GeV - 3.0 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 042201, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 76, 039905 (2007)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.039905

    2007 doi

  177. [187]

    Tang, et al., Cross Sections for theγp→K∗+Λandγp→K ∗+Σ0 Reactions Measured at CLAS, Phys

    W. Tang, et al., Cross Sections for theγp→K∗+Λandγp→K ∗+Σ0 Reactions Measured at CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 87 (6) (2013) 065204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.065204

    2013 doi

  178. [188]

    Moriya, et al., Differential Photoproduction Cross Sections of theΣ0(1385),Λ(1405), andΛ(1520), Phys

    K. Moriya, et al., Differential Photoproduction Cross Sections of theΣ0(1385),Λ(1405), andΛ(1520), Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 045201, [Addendum: Phys.Rev.C 88, 049902 (2013)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.045201

    2013 doi

  179. [189]

    A. V. Anisovich, et al., Differential Cross Sections and Polarization Observables from CLASK∗ Photoproduction and the Search for NewN∗ States, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 142–150.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.029

    2017 doi

  180. [190]

    Shrestha, et al., Differential Cross Sections forΛ(1520)Using Photoproduction at CLAS, Phys

    U. Shrestha, et al., Differential Cross Sections forΛ(1520)Using Photoproduction at CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2) (2021) 025206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.025206. 153

    2021 doi

  181. [191]

    Sumihama, Experimental Results ofK+ Photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS, Nucl

    M. Sumihama, Experimental Results ofK+ Photoproduction at SPring-8/LEPS, Nucl. Phys. A 754 (2005) 303–309. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.079

    2005 doi

  182. [192]

    Rönchen, M

    D. Rönchen, M. Döring, U.-G. Meißner, C.-W. Shen, Light Baryon Resonances from a Coupled-Channel Study IncludingKΣPhotoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. A 58 (11) (2022) 229.doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00852-1

    2022 doi

  183. [193]

    A. V. Anisovich, R. Beck, E. Klempt, V. A. Nikonov, A. V. Sarantsev, U. Thoma, Properties of Baryon Resonances from a Multichannel Partial Wave Analysis, Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (2012) 15.doi:10.1140/epja/i2012-12015-8

    2012 doi

  184. [194]

    Juliá-Díaz, T

    B. Juliá-Díaz, T. S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, L. C. Smith, Dynamical Coupled-Channels Effects on Pion Photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 045205.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.045205

    2008 doi

  185. [195]

    Kamano, S

    H. Kamano, S. X. Nakamura, T. S. H. Lee, T. Sato, Nucleon Resonances within a Dynamical Coupled-Channels Model ofπNandγNReactions, Phys. Rev. C 88 (3) (2013) 035209.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.035209

    2013 doi

  186. [196]

    Rönchen, M

    D. Rönchen, M. Döring, F. Huang, H. Haberzettl, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, U. G. Meißner, K. Nakayama, Photocouplings at the Pole from Pion Photoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. A 50 (6) (2014) 101, [Er- ratum: Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 63 (2015)].doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14101-3

    2014 doi

  187. [197]

    Rönchen, M

    D. Rönchen, M. Döring, U. G. Meißner, The Impact ofK+ΛPhotoproduction on the Resonance Spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. A 54 (6) (2018) 110.doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12541-3

    2018 doi

  188. [198]

    Gutz, et al., High Statistics Study of the Reactionγp→pπ 0η, Eur

    E. Gutz, et al., High Statistics Study of the Reactionγp→pπ 0η, Eur. Phys. J. A 50 (2014) 74.doi:10.1140/ epja/i2014-14074-1

    2014

  189. [199]

    Sarantsev, Properties of Baryons from Bonn-Gatchina Partial Wave Analysis, JPS Conf

    A. Sarantsev, Properties of Baryons from Bonn-Gatchina Partial Wave Analysis, JPS Conf. Proc. 10 (2016) 010005. doi:10.7566/JPSCP.10.010005

    2016 doi

  190. [200]

    Tang, Photoproduction ofK∗+Λ/Σ0 andK 0Σ+ from the Proton Using CLAS at Jefferson Lab, Ph.D

    W. Tang, Photoproduction ofK∗+Λ/Σ0 andK 0Σ+ from the Proton Using CLAS at Jefferson Lab, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio U. (2012)

    2012

  191. [201]

    V. D. Burkert,N ∗ Experiments and what they tell us about Strong QCD Physics, EPJ Web Conf. 241 (2020) 01004.doi:10.1051/epjconf/202024101004

    2020

  192. [202]

    Moriya, et al., Measurement of theΣπPhotoproduction Line Shapes Near theΛ(1405), Phys

    K. Moriya, et al., Measurement of theΣπPhotoproduction Line Shapes Near theΛ(1405), Phys. Rev. C 87 (3) (2013) 035206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.035206

    2013 doi

  193. [203]

    J. C. Nacher, E. Oset, H. Toki, A. Ramos, Photoproduction of theΛ(1405)on the Proton and Nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 455 (1999) 55–61.doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00380-9

    1999 doi

  194. [204]

    R. A. Schumacher, K. Moriya, Isospin Decomposition of the PhotoproducedΣπSystem Near theΛ(1405), Nucl. Phys. A 914 (2013) 51–59.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.03.003

    2013 doi

  195. [205]

    Moriya, et al., Spin and Parity Measurement of theΛ(1405)Baryon, Phys

    K. Moriya, et al., Spin and Parity Measurement of theΛ(1405)Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (8) (2014) 082004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.082004

    2014 doi

  196. [206]

    Taylor, et al., Radiative Decays of theΣ0(1385)andΛ(1520)Hyperons, Phys

    S. Taylor, et al., Radiative Decays of theΣ0(1385)andΛ(1520)Hyperons, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 054609, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 72, 039902 (2005)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054609. 154

    2005 doi

  197. [207]

    Keller, et al., Electromagnetic Decay of theΣ0(1385)toΛγ, Phys

    D. Keller, et al., Electromagnetic Decay of theΣ0(1385)toΛγ, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 072004.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.83.072004

    2011

  198. [208]

    Keller, et al., Branching Ratio of the Electromagnetic Decay of theΣ+(1385), Phys

    D. Keller, et al., Branching Ratio of the Electromagnetic Decay of theΣ+(1385), Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 052004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.052004

    2012 doi

  199. [209]

    Navas, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    S. Navas, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. 030001

    2024 doi

  200. [210]

    J. W. Price, et al., Exclusive Photoproduction of theΞHyperons, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 058201.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.71.058201

    2005

  201. [211]

    Aston, et al., A Study of Inclusive Photoproduction of Hyperons and Anti-Hyperons in the Range of 20 GeV to 70 GeV, Nucl

    D. Aston, et al., A Study of Inclusive Photoproduction of Hyperons and Anti-Hyperons in the Range of 20 GeV to 70 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 189–208.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90552-1

    1982 doi

  202. [212]

    Guo, et al., Cascade Production in the Reactionsγp→K +K +(X)andγp→K +K +π−(X), Phys

    L. Guo, et al., Cascade Production in the Reactionsγp→K +K +(X)andγp→K +K +π−(X), Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 025208.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.025208

    2007 doi

  203. [213]

    Bono, et al., First Measurement ofΞ − Polarization in Photoproduction, Phys

    J. Bono, et al., First Measurement ofΞ − Polarization in Photoproduction, Phys. Lett. B 783 (2018) 280–286. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.004

    2018 doi

  204. [214]

    J. T. Goetz, et al., Study ofΞ∗ Photoproduction from Threshold toW= 3.3GeV, Phys. Rev. C 98 (6) (2018) 062201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.062201

    2018 doi

  205. [215]

    J. K. S. Man, Y. Oh, K. Nakayama, Role of High-Spin Hyperon Resonances in the Reaction ofγp→K+K +Ξ−, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 055201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.055201

    2011 doi

  206. [216]

    Stepanyan, et al., Observation of an ExoticS= +1Baryon in Exclusive Photoproduction from the Deuteron, Phys

    S. Stepanyan, et al., Observation of an ExoticS= +1Baryon in Exclusive Photoproduction from the Deuteron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 252001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.252001

    2003 doi

  207. [217]

    Kubarovsky, et al., Observation of an Exotic Baryon withS= +1in Photoproduction from the Proton, Phys

    V. Kubarovsky, et al., Observation of an Exotic Baryon withS= +1in Photoproduction from the Proton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 032001, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 049902 (2004)].doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 032001

    2004 doi

  208. [218]

    Battaglieri, et al., Search forΘ+(1540)Pentaquark in High Statistics Measurement ofγp→ ¯K 0K +nat CLAS, Phys

    M. Battaglieri, et al., Search forΘ+(1540)Pentaquark in High Statistics Measurement ofγp→ ¯K 0K +nat CLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 042001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.042001

    2006 doi

  209. [219]

    De Vita, et al., Search for theΘ+ Pentaquark in the Reactionsγp→ ¯K 0K +nandγp→ ¯K 0K 0p, Phys

    R. De Vita, et al., Search for theΘ+ Pentaquark in the Reactionsγp→ ¯K 0K +nandγp→ ¯K 0K 0p, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 032001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.032001

    2006 doi

  210. [220]

    Niccolai, et al., Search for theΘ+ Pentaquark in theγd→ΛnK + Reaction Measured with CLAS, Phys

    S. Niccolai, et al., Search for theΘ+ Pentaquark in theγd→ΛnK + Reaction Measured with CLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 032001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.032001

    2006 doi

  211. [221]

    B. A. Raue, D. S. Carman, Ratio ofσL/σT forp(e, e′K +)ΛExtracted from Polarization Transfer, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 065209.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.065209

    2005 doi

  212. [222]

    Ambrozewicz, et al., Separated Structure Functions for the Exclusive Electroproduction ofK+ΛandK +Σ0 Final States, Phys

    P. Ambrozewicz, et al., Separated Structure Functions for the Exclusive Electroproduction ofK+ΛandK +Σ0 Final States, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 045203.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.045203. 155

    2007 doi

  213. [223]

    Nasseripour, et al., Polarized Structure FunctionσLT′ forp(⃗ e, e′K +)Λin the Nucleon Resonance Region, Phys

    R. Nasseripour, et al., Polarized Structure FunctionσLT′ forp(⃗ e, e′K +)Λin the Nucleon Resonance Region, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 065208.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.065208

    2008 doi

  214. [224]

    D. S. Carman, et al., Separated Structure Functions for ExclusiveK+ΛandK +Σ0 Electroproduction at 5.5 GeV with CLAS, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2) (2013) 025204.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.025204

    2013 doi

  215. [225]

    Gabrielyan, et al., Induced Polarization ofΛ(1116)in Kaon Electroproduction, Phys

    M. Gabrielyan, et al., Induced Polarization ofΛ(1116)in Kaon Electroproduction, Phys. Rev. C 90 (3) (2014) 035202.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.035202

    2014 doi

  216. [226]

    D. S. Carman, et al., First Measurement of Transferred Polarization in the Exclusive⃗ ep→e′K +⃗ΛReaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 131804.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.131804

    2003 doi

  217. [227]

    D. S. Carman, Kaon Electromagnetic Production in Hall B, Nucl. Phys. A 754 (2005) 283–293.doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2005.02.095

    2005 doi

  218. [228]

    D. S. Carman, The Strangeness Physics Program at CLAS, in: Proceedings, 12th International Conference on Hadron spectroscopy (Hadron 2007): Frascati, Italy, October 7-13, 2007, pp. 275–286. URLhttp://www.lnf.infn.it/sis/frascatiseries/Volume46/volume46.pdf

    2007

  219. [229]

    D. S. Carman, Strangeness Electroproduction on the Nucleon at CLAS, AIP Conf. Proc. 1432 (1) (2012) 195–198. doi:10.1063/1.3701211

    2012 doi

  220. [230]

    D. S. Carman, CLASN∗ Excitation Results from Pion and Kaon Electroproduction, Few Body Syst. 59 (5) (2018) 82.doi:10.1007/s00601-018-1405-8

    2018 doi

  221. [231]

    D. S. Carman, Excited Nucleon Spectrum and Structure Studies with CLAS and CLAS12, AIP Conf. Proc. 2249 (1) (2020) 030004.doi:10.1063/5.0008932

    2020 doi

  222. [232]

    D. S. Carman, et al., Recoil Polarization inK+YElectroproduction in the Nucleon Resonance Region with CLAS12, Phys. Rev. C 112 (3) (2025) 035206.doi:10.1103/nhvq-7fv7

    2025 doi

  223. [233]

    O. V. Maxwell, Electromagnetic Production of Kaons from Protons, and Baryon Electromagnetic Form Factors, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 034611.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034611

    2012 doi

  224. [234]

    De Cruz, J

    L. De Cruz, J. Ryckebusch, T. Vrancx, P. Vancraeyveld, Bayesian Analysis of Kaon Photoproduction with the Regge-Plus-Resonance Model, Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 015212.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.015212

    2012 doi

  225. [235]

    Corthals, T

    T. Corthals, T. Van Cauteren, P. Van Craeyveld, J. Ryckebusch, D. G. Ireland, Electroproduction of Kaons from the Proton in a Regge-Plus-Resonance Approach, Phys. Lett. B 656 (2007) 186–192.doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2007.09.036

    2007 doi

  226. [236]

    Boffi, C

    S. Boffi, C. Giusti, F. D. Pacati, Nuclear Response in Electromagnetic Interactions with Complex Nuclei, Phys. Rept. 226 (1993) 1–101.doi:10.1016/0370-1573(93)90132-W

    1993 doi

  227. [237]

    Isgur, J

    N. Isgur, J. E. Paton, A Flux Tube Model for Hadrons in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 2910.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.31.2910

    1985

  228. [238]

    G. S. Bali, K. Schilling, C. Schlichter, Observing Long Color Flux Tubes in SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5165–5198.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5165. 156

    1995 doi

  229. [239]

    Le Yaouanc, L

    A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, J. C. Raynal, Naive Quark Pair Creation Model of Strong Interaction Vertices, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 2223–2234.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.2223

    1973 doi

  230. [240]

    Geiger, E

    P. Geiger, E. S. Swanson, Distinguishing Among Strong Decay Models, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6855–6862.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6855

    1994 doi

  231. [241]

    Barnes, Hadron 2001 Conference Summary: Theory, AIP Conf

    T. Barnes, Hadron 2001 Conference Summary: Theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 619 (1) (2002) 447–462.doi:10.1063/1. 1482473

    2001 doi

  232. [242]

    T. Mart, A. Sulaksono, Kaon Photoproduction in a Multipole Approach, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 055203.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.055203

    2006 doi

  233. [243]

    M. Mai, J. Hergenrather, M. Döring, T. Mart, U.-G. Meißner, D. Rönchen, R. Workman, Inclusion ofKΛElec- troproduction Data in a Coupled Channel Analysis, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (12) (2023) 286.doi:10.1140/epja/ s10050-023-01188-0

    2023 doi

  234. [244]

    H. Y. Lu, et al., First Observation of theΛ(1405)Line Shape in Electroproduction, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 045202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.045202

    2013 doi

  235. [245]

    Hyodo, D

    T. Hyodo, D. Jido, The Nature of theΛ(1405)Resonance in Chiral Dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 55–98.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.07.002

    2012 doi

  236. [246]

    S. P. Barrow, et al., Electroproduction of theΛ(1520)Hyperon, Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 044601.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.64.044601

    2001

  237. [247]

    P. A. Adderley, et al., The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility at 12 GeV, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27 (8) (2024) 084802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.084802

    2024 doi

  238. [248]

    V. D. Burkert, Jefferson Lab at 12 GeV: The Science Program, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 405–428. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021129

    2018 doi

  239. [249]

    Arrington, et al., Physics with CEBAF at 12 GeV and Future Opportunities, Prog

    J. Arrington, et al., Physics with CEBAF at 12 GeV and Future Opportunities, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127 (2022) 103985.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103985

    2022

  240. [250]

    Achenbach, F

    P. Achenbach, F. Garibaldi, T. Gogami, P. Markowitz, S. Nagao, S. N. Nakamura, J. Reinhold, L. Tang, G. M. Urciuoli, The Hypernuclear Physics Program at Jefferson Lab, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (4) (2024) 231.doi:10.1393/ ncc/i2024-24231-8

    2024

  241. [251]

    Bombaci, The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, JPS Conf

    I. Bombaci, The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, JPS Conf. Proc. 17 (2017) 101002.doi:10.7566/JPSCP.17. 101002

    2017 doi

  242. [252]

    S. Nakamura, et al., An Isospin Dependence Study of theΛ−NInteraction through the High Precision Spectroscopy ofΛHypernuclei with Electron Beam, Approved Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Experiment E12-24-013, https://misportal.jlab.org/mis/physics/experiments/viewProposal.cfm?paperId=1124(2024)

    2024

  243. [253]

    Schulz, et al., Ground-State Binding Energy of4 ΛH from High-Resolution Decay-Pion Spectroscopy, Nucl

    F. Schulz, et al., Ground-State Binding Energy of4 ΛH from High-Resolution Decay-Pion Spectroscopy, Nucl. Phys. A 954 (2016) 149–160.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.03.015. 157

    2016 doi

  244. [254]

    T. O. Yamamoto, et al., Observation of Spin-Dependent Charge Symmetry Breaking inΛNInteraction: Gamma- Ray Spectroscopy of4 ΛHe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (22) (2015) 222501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.222501

    2015 doi

  245. [255]

    T. Gogami, et al., Study of Charge Symmetry Breaking inp-Shell Hypernuclei, Approved Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Ex- periment E12-24-004,https://misportal.jlab.org/mis/physics/experiments/viewProposal.cfm?paperId= 1143(2024)

    2024

  246. [256]

    Ali, et al., The SHMS 11 GeV/c Spectrometer in Hall C at Jefferson Lab (3 2025).arXiv:2503.08706

    S. Ali, et al., The SHMS 11 GeV/c Spectrometer in Hall C at Jefferson Lab (3 2025).arXiv:2503.08706

    2025

  247. [257]

    Z.-Q. Yao, D. Binosi, C. D. Roberts, Onset of Scaling Violation in Pion and Kaon Elastic Electromagnetic Form Factors, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138823.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138823

    2024

  248. [258]

    G. F. Chew, F. E. Low, Theory of Photomeson Production at Low Energies, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956) 1579–1587. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.101.1579

    1956 doi

  249. [259]

    Ghahramany, K

    N. Ghahramany, K. Rostami, M. Ghanatian, Charged Pion Form Factor Determination in the Range ofQ2 = 0.6−1.6(GeV/c) 2, Commun. Theor. Phys. 42 (2004) 83–86.doi:10.1088/0253-6102/42/1/83

    2004 doi

  250. [260]

    A. R. Dzierba, The Science of Confinement and the GlueX/Hall D Project at Jefferson Lab, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 397–404.doi:10.1142/S0217751X03014319

    2003 doi

  251. [261]

    Adhikari, et al., The GlueX Beamline and Detector, Nucl

    S. Adhikari, et al., The GlueX Beamline and Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 987 (2021) 164807.doi:10.1016/ j.nima.2020.164807

    2021

  252. [262]

    Aston, et al., The LASS Spectrometer, SLAC Report SLAC-R-298 (1987)

    D. Aston, et al., The LASS Spectrometer, SLAC Report SLAC-R-298 (1987). URLhttps://inspirehep.net/files/61ed3ad418ddcf35668ec47d1c36c553

    1987

  253. [263]

    Barakat, et al., Construction of the MEGA Photon Detector, Nucl

    M. Barakat, et al., Construction of the MEGA Photon Detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 349 (1994) 118–137. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(94)90615-7

    1994 doi

  254. [264]

    Adhikari, et al., Search for Photoproduction of Axionlike Particles at GlueX, Phys

    S. Adhikari, et al., Search for Photoproduction of Axionlike Particles at GlueX, Phys. Rev. D 105 (5) (2022) 052007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.052007

    2022 doi

  255. [265]

    Ali, et al., Initial Performance of the GlueX DIRC Detector, J

    A. Ali, et al., Initial Performance of the GlueX DIRC Detector, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2374 (1) (2022) 012009. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2374/1/012009

    2022 doi

  256. [266]

    Somov, Lead Tungstate Calorimeter of the Jefferson LabηFactory Experiment, EPJ Web Conf

    A. Somov, Lead Tungstate Calorimeter of the Jefferson LabηFactory Experiment, EPJ Web Conf. 320 (2025) 00058.doi:10.1051/epjconf/202532000058

    2025

  257. [267]

    Dobbs, Strange Hadron Spectroscopy with the KLong Facility at Jefferson Lab, Rev

    S. Dobbs, Strange Hadron Spectroscopy with the KLong Facility at Jefferson Lab, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 3 (3) (2022) 0308032.doi:10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.3.0308032

    2022 doi

  258. [268]

    Pauli, The Strangeness Program at GlueX, EPJ Web Conf

    P. Pauli, The Strangeness Program at GlueX, EPJ Web Conf. 271 (2022) 02001.doi:10.1051/epjconf/ 202227102001

    2022 doi

  259. [269]

    Adhikari, et al., Measurement of the Photon Beam Asymmetry in⃗ γp→K+Σ0 atE γ = 8.5GeV, Phys

    S. Adhikari, et al., Measurement of the Photon Beam Asymmetry in⃗ γp→K+Σ0 atE γ = 8.5GeV, Phys. Rev. C 101 (6) (2020) 065206.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.065206. 158

    2020 doi

  260. [270]

    Adhikari, et al., Measurement of Spin Density Matrix Elements inΛ(1520)Photoproduction at 8.2-8.8 GeV, Phys

    S. Adhikari, et al., Measurement of Spin Density Matrix Elements inΛ(1520)Photoproduction at 8.2-8.8 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 105 (3) (2022) 035201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.035201

    2022 doi

  261. [271]

    D. J. Quinn, J. P. Rutherfoord, M. A. Shupe, D. Sherden, R. Siemann, C. K. Sinclair, A Study of Charged Pseudoscalar Meson Photoproduction From Hydrogen and Deuterium With 16 GeV Linearly Polarized Photons, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 1553.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1553

    1979 doi

  262. [272]

    Corthals, J

    T. Corthals, J. Ryckebusch, T. Van Cauteren, Forward-AngleK+ΛPhotoproduction in a Regge-Plus-Resonance Approach, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 045207.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.045207

    2006 doi

  263. [273]

    Dalton, et al., GlueX with a 1-4 GeV Photon Beam (2025)

    M. Dalton, et al., GlueX with a 1-4 GeV Photon Beam (2025). URLhttps://misportal.jlab.org/pacProposals/proposals/2045/attachments/220520/Proposal.pdf

    2025

  264. [274]

    Kuznetsov, et al., Evidence for a Narrow Structure atW∼1.68-GeV inηPhotoproduction on the Neutron, Phys

    V. Kuznetsov, et al., Evidence for a Narrow Structure atW∼1.68-GeV inηPhotoproduction on the Neutron, Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007) 23–29.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.041

    2007 doi

  265. [275]

    Jaegle, et al., Quasi-Free Photoproduction ofηMesons of the Neutron, Phys

    I. Jaegle, et al., Quasi-Free Photoproduction ofηMesons of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 252002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.252002

    2008 doi

  266. [276]

    Werthmüller, et al., Narrow Structure in the Excitation Function ofηPhotoproduction off the Neutron, Phys

    D. Werthmüller, et al., Narrow Structure in the Excitation Function ofηPhotoproduction off the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (23) (2013) 232001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.232001

    2013 doi

  267. [277]

    Witthauer, et al., Insight into the Narrow Structure inηPhotoproduction on the Neutron from Helicity- Dependent Cross Sections, Phys

    L. Witthauer, et al., Insight into the Narrow Structure inηPhotoproduction on the Neutron from Helicity- Dependent Cross Sections, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (13) (2016) 132502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.132502

    2016 doi

  268. [278]

    Ablikim, et al., Polarization and Entanglement in Baryon-Antibaryon Pair Production in Electron-Positron Annihilation, Nature Phys

    M. Ablikim, et al., Polarization and Entanglement in Baryon-Antibaryon Pair Production in Electron-Positron Annihilation, Nature Phys. 15 (2019) 631–634.doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0494-8

    2019 doi

  269. [279]

    D. G. Ireland, M. Döring, D. I. Glazier, J. Haidenbauer, M. Mai, R. Murray-Smith, D. Rönchen, Kaon Photopro- duction and theΛDecay Parameterα −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (18) (2019) 182301.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 123.182301

    2019 doi

  270. [280]

    Wickramaarachchi, R

    N. Wickramaarachchi, R. A. Schumacher, G. Kalicy, Decay of theΛ(1405)Hyperon toΣ0π0 Measured at GlueX, EPJ Web Conf. 271 (2022) 07005.doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227107005

    2022

  271. [281]

    Yu, K.-J

    B.-G. Yu, K.-J. Kong, Photoproduction ofγp→K +Λ∗(1520)and Decay ofΛ ∗(1520)→K −pin the Reggeized Framework, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2) (2017) 025208.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.025208

    2017 doi

  272. [282]

    D. P. Barber, et al., A Large Aperture Spectrometer for the Study of Multibody Photoproduction in the Incident Energy Range 1 GeV to 5 GeV, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 155 (1978) 353.doi:10.1016/0029-554X(78)90517-7

    1978 doi

  273. [283]

    V. D. Burkert, et al., The CLAS12 Spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 959 (2020) 163419.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.163419

    2020

  274. [284]

    Klimenko, et al., Inclusive Electron Scattering in the Resonance Region off a Hydrogen Target with CLAS12, Phys

    V. Klimenko, et al., Inclusive Electron Scattering in the Resonance Region off a Hydrogen Target with CLAS12, Phys. Rev. C 112 (2) (2025) 025201.doi:10.1103/qy4p-dyjt

    2025 doi

  275. [285]

    S. J. Brodsky, et al., Strong QCD from Hadron Structure Experiments: Newport News, VA, USA, November 4-8, 2019, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 29 (08) (2020) 2030006.doi:10.1142/S0218301320300064. 159

    2019 doi

  276. [286]

    V. I. Mokeev, D. S. Carman, Photo- and Electrocouplings of Nucleon Resonances, Few Body Syst. 63 (3) (2022) 59.doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01760-2

    2022 doi

  277. [287]

    D. S. Carman, R. W. Gothe, V. I. Mokeev, C. D. Roberts, Nucleon Resonance Electroexcitation Amplitudes and Emergent Hadron Mass, Particles 6 (1) (2023) 416–439.doi:10.3390/particles6010023

    2023 doi

  278. [288]

    Achenbach, D

    P. Achenbach, D. S. Carman, R. W. Gothe, K. Joo, V. I. Mokeev, C. D. Roberts, Electroexcitation of Nucleon Resonances and Emergence of Hadron Mass, Symmetry 17 (7) (2025) 1106.doi:10.3390/sym17071106

    2025 doi

  279. [289]

    D. S. Carman, et al., Beam-Recoil Transferred Polarization inK+YElectroproduction in the Nucleon Resonance Region with CLAS12, Phys. Rev. C 105 (6) (2022) 065201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.065201

    2022 doi

  280. [290]

    Mizutani, C

    T. Mizutani, C. Fayard, G. H. Lamot, B. Saghai, Off-Shell Effects in the Electromagnetic Production of Strangeness, Phys. Rev. C 58 (1998) 75–90.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.58.75

    1998 doi

  281. [291]

    Mart, Role ofP13(1720)inKΣPhotoproduction, Phys

    T. Mart, Role ofP13(1720)inKΣPhotoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 038201.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62. 038201

    2000 doi

  282. [292]

    Petrellis, D

    D. Petrellis, D. Skoupil, Photoproduction ofK+Σ0 within the Isobar Model, Phys. Rev. C 110 (6) (2024) 065204. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.065204

    2024 doi

  283. [293]

    Gnanvo, F

    K. Gnanvo, F. Hauenstein, S. Liyanaarachchi, N. Liyanage, H. Nguyen, R. Paremuzyan, S. Stepanyan,µRWELL Detector Developments at Jefferson Lab for High Luminosity Experiments, PoS QNP2024 (2025) 014.doi:10. 22323/1.465.0014

    2025

  284. [294]

    Chabanat, N

    E. Chabanat, N. Estre, Deterministic Annealing for Vertex Finding at CMS, in: 14th International Conference on Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics, 2005, pp. 287–290. URLhttps://cds.cern.ch/record/865587/files/p287.pdf

    2005

  285. [295]

    Fleischmann, Track Reconstruction in the ATLAS Experiment: The Deterministic Annealing Filter, Ph.D

    S. Fleischmann, Track Reconstruction in the ATLAS Experiment: The Deterministic Annealing Filter, Ph.D. thesis, Wuppertal U. (2006). URLhttps://repository.cern/records/k6f99-bx344

    2006

  286. [296]

    Gavalian, P

    G. Gavalian, P. Thomadakis, A. Angelopoulos, N. Chrisochoides, Charged Track Reconstruction with Artificial Intelligence for CLAS12, EPJ Web Conf. 295 (2024) 09038.doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429509038

    2024

  287. [297]

    Acker, et al., The CLAS12 Forward Tagger, Nucl

    A. Acker, et al., The CLAS12 Forward Tagger, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 959 (2020) 163475.doi:10.1016/j.nima. 2020.163475

    2020

  288. [298]

    Afanasev, et al., Photoproduction of the Very Strangest Baryons on a Proton Target in CLAS12 (2012)

    A. Afanasev, et al., Photoproduction of the Very Strangest Baryons on a Proton Target in CLAS12 (2012). URLhttps://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/proposals/12/PR12-12-008.pdf

    2012

  289. [299]

    Khanal, Search for Excited Cascade Hyperons (Ξ∗−) Using the CLAS12 Spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory, Ph.D

    A. Khanal, Search for Excited Cascade Hyperons (Ξ∗−) Using the CLAS12 Spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory, Ph.D. thesis, Florida International University (2022). URLhttps://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/general/thesis/AKhanal_thesis.pdf 160

    2022

  290. [300]

    Carvajal, First Time Measurement of Ground StateΞ−(1320)Hyperon Cross Section in Electroproduction, Ph.D

    J. Carvajal, First Time Measurement of Ground StateΞ−(1320)Hyperon Cross Section in Electroproduction, Ph.D. thesis, Florida International University (2024). URLhttps://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/general/thesis/JCarvajal_thesis.pdf

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.