Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

This paper establishes that missing-energy predictions for a light vector coupled to an anomalous Standard-Model current are fixed by anomaly matching once the vector's mass and coupling are chosen.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 18:51 UTC pith:RONZ6BVM

load-bearing objection The IR/WZ framework and missing-energy map are solid and worth publishing; the printed UV models in Section 4 have gauge-invariance inconsistencies that must be fixed before the UV claims stand. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.04394 v2 pith:RONZ6BVM submitted 2026-03-04 hep-ph

A framework for missing-energy searches with anomalous light vectors

Luca Di Luzio , Marco Nardecchia , Stefano Scacco , Claudio Toni This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords light vectorsU(1)_X gauge bosonsanomaly cancellationWess-Zumino termsmissing-energy searchesrare meson decaysanomalonsfinite naturalness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper targets light U(1) gauge bosons whose coupling to Standard-Model fermions is anomalous, requiring new charged fermions (anomalons) for consistency. It argues that if anomalon masses come from the same spontaneous symmetry breaking that gives the vector its mass, then integrating them out leaves Wess-Zumino interactions whose coefficients are set by mixed-anomaly cancellation. These coefficients then determine every missing-energy signal — rare kaon, D, and B decays plus radiative Z decays — with no additional free parameters. The consequence is that a single measurement of one invisible-decay channel predicts all the others, making current and future searches for missing energy a direct probe of the underlying anomaly structure. A reader should care because it turns a zoo of possible models into a parameter-free testable pattern.

Core claim

The central claim is that below the U(1)_X-breaking scale the nontrivial physics of a light vector X coupled to an electroweak-anomalous Standard-Model current is captured by two Wess-Zumino operators, X W ∂W and X B ∂B. Their coefficients are not free: matching the cancellation of the [SU(2)^2 U(1)_X] and [U(1)_Y^2 U(1)_X] anomalies fixes them to ∓3α_{B+L} times gauge couplings. From these two operators the paper derives a predictive flavor-changing structure for s→d, c→u, b→d, and b→s transitions, via the longitudinal-mode equivalence theorem, and a tree-level Z→γX amplitude. Thus K→πE_miss, D→πE_miss, B→π/ρ/K^(*)E_miss, and Z→γE_miss are predicted once m_X and g_X are chosen. The paper al

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of Wess-Zumino (WZ) operators, of schematic form X(W ∂W + W W W) and X B ∂B. Their coefficients are the SM mixed-anomaly traces, with A^SM_XY Y = −A^SM_XWW = 3α_{B+L}, where α_{B+L} is the combination of baryon and lepton-number charges defining the current. These dimension-4 interactions are generated at one loop when the anomalons are integrated out; they reproduce the anomalous variation of the SM current and, through the equivalence theorem for the longitudinal mode (X_μ → ∂_μ ξ/m_X), generate the axion-like couplings that drive rare meson decays. The classification of minimal anomalon spectra (one Majorana-like multiplet plus one Dirac pair, or two Dir

Load-bearing premise

The framework hinges on the new fermions getting their mass from the same scalar that breaks the new U(1), not from the Standard-Model Higgs or from explicit mass terms; if that fails, the anomaly-matching prediction collapses.

What would settle it

Measure two missing-energy channels whose ratio the framework fixes, for example B→K E_miss versus B→K*E_miss or K→πE_miss versus Z→γE_miss, with enough precision to extract the two WZ coefficients independently; if the inferred coefficients contradict the mixed-anomaly relation for a known charge assignment, the singlet-VEV-dominated mass assumption is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Once m_X and g_X are chosen, the framework predicts the rates of K→πE_miss, D→πE_miss, B→π/ρ/K^(*)E_miss, and Z→γE_miss with no further parameters.
  • The WZ mechanism imposes a minimal-flavor-violation pattern, so the ratio of B→K*E_miss to B→K E_miss is fixed; future data can discriminate this class from scalar or axion explanations.
  • In the gauged τ-flavor benchmark with m_X below the τ-pair threshold, X decays invisibly, and the framework can accommodate the recent B→K missing-energy excess while predicting an observable B→K* missing-energy rate.
  • Z→γE_miss is the most powerful single probe; a future high-luminosity Z factory can improve sensitivity by two to three orders of magnitude and test the framework down to per-mille fine-tuning.
  • Finite naturalness plus current collider searches restrict minimal anomalon spectra to masses around a few hundred GeV to a few TeV, making direct anomalon searches a complementary test.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central assumption holds, the same anomaly-matching logic could be applied to any future anomalous light vector, giving a general dictionary between gauge charges and missing-energy rates.
  • A natural next test is to use the predicted relation between Z→γE_miss and meson decays to check the framework against future measurements; a deviation would point toward explicit anomalon mass terms or additional light states rather than a failure of the missing-energy classification itself.
  • The finite-naturalness bound suggests that if no anomalons appear below a few TeV, the viable parameter space shrinks to tuned or non-minimal UV completions; this could be sharpened by extending the classification beyond N_Ψ=4 or to colored anomalons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies light U(1)_X gauge bosons coupled to electroweak-anomalous SM currents. It argues that, when the new fermions ('anomalons') required for anomaly cancellation get their mass predominantly from a SM-singlet VEV, integrating them out yields Wess–Zumino operators whose coefficients are fixed by mixed-anomaly matching. The paper classifies minimal anomalon spectra (N_Ψ ≤ 4), derives the resulting missing-energy phenomenology for K→πE_miss, B→K^(*)E_miss, D→πE_miss, and Z→γE_miss, and presents explicit UV completions as a benchmark for the Belle II B^+→K^+E_miss excess. The IR framework is standard and the phenomenological survey is broad, but the explicit UV sections contain gauge-invariance inconsistencies in the printed charge tables and Yukawa terms.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a valuable model-independent mapping from mixed-anomaly data to rates for rare missing-energy processes, together with a useful classification of minimal anomalon sectors. The central anomaly-matching logic is transparent, the classification in Appendix A is checkable, and the paper makes falsifiable predictions (e.g., B(B→K^*E_miss) at the Belle II best-fit point, Z→γE_miss at FCC-ee). These are real strengths. However, the explicit UV models advertised as 'fully viable benchmarks' in Section 4 are not gauge-invariant as written; the UV-side claims therefore need repair before the paper can be accepted. The IR and phenomenological parts appear sound and should survive the correction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.6) and Table 5] The Yukawa term y_BB B_L S^* (B_L)^c is not gauge invariant with the charges of Table 5. With X(B_L)=-1/12 and X(S)=1/6, the invariant Majorana combination is B_L S B_L (charge 2·(-1/12)+1/6=0), whereas the printed expression carries charge -1/6. The hypercharge and SU(2) charges are compatible with a chiral ML state, but the displayed operator is not. This invalidates the 1DL–1ML model as written and hence the 'fully viable benchmark' conclusion at the end of Sec. 4.1.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.9) and Table 6] With the charges of Table 6, the four Yukawa entries in Eq. (4.9) have U(1)_X charges: y_AA S term: 2X+1; y_AB H^† term: 2X+1; y_BA H term: 2X−1; y_BB S^* term: 2X−1. No value of X makes both 2X+1=0 and 2X−1=0, so the Lagrangian is not gauge invariant for any X. The correct transcription from Eq. (A.11) appears to require A_R and B_R charges with −X rather than +X, and S/S^* interchanged in the mass matrix. As printed, the explicit 2DL UV completion does not exist.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.3 and Table 3] Table 3 is captioned 'one ML and one DL pair', but the text and the table itself describe two DL pairs for N_Ψ=4. Please correct the caption/header.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.1)] The relation A^SM_XYY = -A^SM_XWW = 3 α_{B+L} is easy to misread against Eqs. (2.4)–(2.5), which use a different normalization (factor 1/2 from the anticommutator for the nonabelian trace). Please state explicitly which normalization of the anomaly trace is being used, to avoid a factor-of-2 confusion in the numerical results.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.5 and Fig. 2] The left panel of Fig. 2 refers to 'L-only' and 'L=−4R' models of Ref. [23] without defining them here. A one-sentence definition or reference to the original notation would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. 4.1] Typos: 'responsable' should be 'responsible'; 'respectevely' should be 'respectively'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the IR WZ derivation is self-contained; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations and a fitted benchmark appear.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. Eq. (3.1) asserts that integrating out anomalons generates WZ operators whose coefficients are fixed by the SM mixed-anomaly traces, A_SM_XYY = -A_SM_XWW = 3 alpha_B+L; this is an anomaly-matching statement supported by independent references ([7,8,11,13]) rather than by the missing-energy observables later computed. The flavor-changing couplings g_xi in Eqs. (3.6)-(3.7) depend only on these traces, CKM elements, and loop functions, while the meson rates in Eqs. (3.9)-(3.10) use external form factors. The constraints in Figs. 1 and 3 are recasts of experimental limits, and the Belle II benchmark fits g_X from external fits (Refs. [24,59]) instead of from the paper's own derived quantities; the resulting Z->gamma X rate is an independent cross-check against LEP. The anomalon classification in Section 2 solves the closed anomaly conditions (2.4)-(2.6) and is therefore not defined in terms of the phenomenology it predicts. Self-citations ([12,23,48,60]) are present but not load-bearing: the core WZ result has independent support, and the author-overlapping recasts are auxiliary inputs to figures. The Section 4 charge-consistency problems raised by the skeptical reader are internal consistency/correctness issues, not circularity; even if the printed tables make some explicit UV Lagrangians invalid as written, that does not make the IR derivation equivalent to its inputs. No claimed prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain; the score 1 reflects only the non-load-bearing self-citations and the illustrative fitted benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that anomalon masses come from a SM-preserving U(1)X-breaking VEV, so that WZ coefficients are fixed by anomaly matching. The benchmark adds one free gauge coupling g_X (and a chosen mass m_X) fit to Belle II data, plus external best-fit gS,gP amplitudes. Finite naturalness is an adopted criterion rather than a derived constraint. The UV examples further introduce an SM-singlet scalar and specific anomalon Yukawa couplings; as printed, the charge assignments in Tables 5/6 do not satisfy gauge invariance of the written Yukawa terms.

free parameters (5)
  • g_X (new gauge coupling) = ≈0.018 for the m_X=2.1 GeV benchmark
    The only free parameter in the benchmark τ-flavor model; fit to Belle II B→K+Emiss and Z→γX constraints in Section 3.2.5 / Fig. 2.
  • m_X (vector mass) = 2.1 GeV
    Chosen from the Belle II excess best-fit mass of Refs. [24,59]; all benchmark rates and Fig. 3 limits are functions of it.
  • External b→sEmiss fit amplitudes |g_S|, |g_P| = |g_S|=(1.6±0.2)e-8, |g_P|<2.5e-8
    Imported from the global fit of Refs. [24,59] in Eqs. (3.25)-(3.27) and used to extract g_X; not derived in this paper.
  • Finite-naturalness tuning threshold Δ = 100 (1% tuning)
    Chosen in Eq. (2.8); controls the anomalon mass bounds in Tables 2/3 and the grey bands in Fig. 3.
  • Anomalon Yukawa couplings = not fitted; only bounds (e.g., y_AB,y_BA ≲ O(10^{-1}))
    The UV mass matrices in Section 4 depend on y_AA,y_BB,y_AB,y_BA; perturbativity and EW/Higgs constraints are imposed, but no numerical fits are made.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Anomalon masses arise predominantly from a SM-preserving ⟨S⟩ VEV, with no significant EW-breaking or vector-like bare masses.
    Used in Sections 2.2 criterion (i), 3.1, and 4 to integrate out anomalons and fix WZ coefficients by anomaly matching.
  • standard math Integrating out chiral fermions generates local Wess-Zumino terms with coefficients equal to the SM mixed anomaly traces.
    The theoretical backbone of Eqs. (3.1)-(3.7), citing D'Hoker-Farhi, Preskill, and Dror-Lasenby-Pospelov; accepted but unproved in the preprint.
  • domain assumption SM Yukawa operators are present at the renormalizable level and the SM Higgs doublet is neutral under U(1)X.
    Stated in Section 1 to make Eq. (1.1) the most general gauged abelian symmetry of the SM.
  • domain assumption The Goldstone-boson equivalence theorem dominates X-emission amplitudes; non-abelian W^3 terms are subleading.
    Used to derive Eq. (3.4)-(3.9); the paper notes O(m_X^2/m_B^2)≈15% corrections at the benchmark, Section 3.2.5.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-naturalness criterion with Δ≤100 is a valid guide for bounding anomalon masses.
    An adopted model-selection principle from Ref. [6], not derived from SM or experiment; it sets the relevance of the UV mass bounds.
  • domain assumption The invisible branching ratio of X is given by Eq. (3.28), with no additional light states altering it.
    Central to mapping X decay rates onto missing-energy searches; caveated in footnote 7 and Section 3.3.
invented entities (3)
  • Anomalous light vector X (U(1)X gauge boson) independent evidence
    purpose: New force carrier coupled to electroweak-anomalous SM currents; produces missing-energy signatures through decays to neutrinos.
    Falsifiable via B→K(*)Emiss, K→πEmiss, D→πEmiss, and Z→γEmiss; the framework predicts rates as functions of (m_X,g_X).
  • Anomalons Ψ (new chiral fermions charged under U(1)X and SU(2)L×U(1)Y) independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel the U(1)X and mixed anomalies; generate WZ interactions when integrated out.
    Their mass scale is bounded by finite naturalness and they are directly searchable at the LHC via disappearing tracks and charged-track searches.
  • SM-singlet scalar S no independent evidence
    purpose: Breaks U(1)X via ⟨S⟩ and gives mass to X and the anomalons.
    Only its VEV enters mX and anomalon masses; its radial mode and Higgs-mixing phenomenology are not developed into a distinct observable handle.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27226 in / 28754 out tokens · 283334 ms · 2026-08-02T18:51:25.868013+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study light spin-1 gauge bosons coupled to electroweak-anomalous currents. For generic charge assignments, anomaly cancellation requires new fermions (anomalons) that are chiral under the new abelian symmetry and carry electroweak charges. If their masses arise from the breaking of the new gauge symmetry, integrating them out generates Wess-Zumino interactions fixed by mixed-anomaly matching, providing the infrared description of the theory. We classify minimal anomalon spectra, derive the corresponding effective interactions, and combine experimental constraints with finite-naturalness considerations to bound the UV completion scale. Motivated by recent NA62 and Belle II results, we then develop a unified phenomenological framework for the missing-energy signatures of these anomalous light vectors, focusing on scenarios where the new vector decays predominantly into neutrinos so that the leading probes are rare processes with invisible final states. As applications, we survey current and projected searches across flavour and electroweak observables, including $K\to\pi E_{\rm miss}$, $B\to K^{(*)}E_{\rm miss}$, and $Z\to\gamma E_{\rm miss}$, and discuss their interplay with direct searches for anomalons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04394 by Claudio Toni, Luca Di Luzio, Marco Nardecchia, Stefano Scacco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Upper limits (blue lines) at 90% C.L. on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: Regions of constant ∆χ 2 ≡ χ 2 −χ 2 min in the (gXA SM XWW , gXA SM XY Y ) plane. The green, yellow, and orange bands correspond to the 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ regions obtained from the combined fit to B → K (∗)X and Z → γX. For comparison, the solid, dashed, and dot-dashed gray contours show the corresponding 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ regions from Z → γX alone. The red and blue curves illustrate the predictions o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper panel: Lower limits on the gauge coupling gX at 90% C.L. for the gauged τ - flavor symmetry benchmark, derived from missing-energy searches in Z → γX at LEP (L3) [41] (pink), K + → π +X at NA62 [20] (red), KL → π 0X at KOTO [37] (blue), D → πX at CLEO [38] (orange), B → πX, ρX at Belle [39] (purple), and B + → K +X at Belle II [22] (green, recast in Ref. [60]). Also shown are indicative bounds from d… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 41 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,

    B. Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,”Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196–198

    1986

  2. [2]

    New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,

    R. Foot, “New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 527–530

    1991

  3. [3]

    New Z-prime Phenomenology,

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “New Z-prime Phenomenology,”Phys. Rev. D 43(1991) 22–24

    1991

  4. [4]

    Simplest Z-prime model,

    X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas, “Simplest Z-prime model,”Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 2118–2132. 24

    1991

  5. [5]

    Closing in on new chiral leptons at the LHC,

    D. Barducci, L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, “Closing in on new chiral leptons at the LHC,”JHEP12(2023) 154,arXiv:2311.10130 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests,

    M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, and A. Strumia, “A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests,”JHEP08(2013) 022,arXiv:1303.7244 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Decoupling a Fermion Whose Mass Is Generated by a Yukawa Coupling: The General Case,

    E. D’Hoker and E. Farhi, “Decoupling a Fermion Whose Mass Is Generated by a Yukawa Coupling: The General Case,”Nucl. Phys. B248(1984) 59–76

    1984

  8. [8]

    Decoupling a Fermion in the Standard Electroweak Theory,

    E. D’Hoker and E. Farhi, “Decoupling a Fermion in the Standard Electroweak Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B248(1984) 77

    1984

  9. [9]

    Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory,

    J. Preskill, “Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory,”Annals Phys.210(1991) 323–379

    1991

  10. [10]

    Low-energy effects of heavy chiral fermions,

    F. Feruglio, A. Masiero, and L. Maiani, “Low-energy effects of heavy chiral fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B387(1992) 523–561

    1992

  11. [11]

    Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents,

    J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, “Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 7, (2017) 075036,arXiv:1707.01503 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Light vectors coupled to anomalous currents with harmless Wess-Zumino terms,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, “Light vectors coupled to anomalous currents with harmless Wess-Zumino terms,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 115042,arXiv:2204.05945 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    New constraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents,

    J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, “New constraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents,”Phys. Rev. Lett.119no. 14, (2017) 141803,arXiv:1705.06726 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach,

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori, and A. Strumia, “Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach,”Nucl. Phys. B645(2002) 155–187,arXiv:hep-ph/0207036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    AnomalousZ ′ and diboson resonances at the LHC,

    A. Ismail and A. Katz, “AnomalousZ ′ and diboson resonances at the LHC,”JHEP04(2018) 122,arXiv:1712.01840 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Probing newU(1) gauge symmetries via exoticZ→Z ′γdecays,

    L. Michaels and F. Yu, “Probing newU(1) gauge symmetries via exoticZ→Z ′γdecays,”JHEP 03(2021) 120,arXiv:2010.00021 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Anomalous Z’ bosons for anomalous B decays,

    J. Davighi, “Anomalous Z’ bosons for anomalous B decays,”JHEP08(2021) 101, arXiv:2105.06918 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Effective Field Theory of St¨ uckelberg Vector Bosons,

    G. D. Kribs, G. Lee, and A. Martin, “Effective Field Theory of St¨ uckelberg Vector Bosons,” arXiv:2204.01755 [hep-ph]. [19]NA62Collaboration, E. Cortina Gilet al., “Observation of theK + →π +ννdecay and measurement of its branching ratio,”JHEP02(2025) 191,arXiv:2412.12015 [hep-ex]. [20]NA62Collaboration, E. Cortina Gilet al., “Searches for hidden sectors...

    arXiv 2025

  19. [21]

    New measurement of theK + →π +ννdecay at NA62

    R. Fiorenza,“New measurement of theK + →π +ννdecay at NA62”, presented atLes Rencontres de Physique de la Vall´ ee d’Aoste, La Thuile (Italy), 1–7 March, 2026. [22]Belle-IICollaboration, I. Adachiet al., “Evidence for B+→K+νν¯decays,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 11, (2024) 112006,arXiv:2311.14647 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [23]

    Gaugedτ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia, and C. Toni, “Gaugedτ-lepton chiral currents and B→K(*)Emiss,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 055031,arXiv:2505.11499 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [24]

    Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss,

    P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 055001,arXiv:2403.13887 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [25]

    Light new physics and theτlepton dipole moments,

    M. Hoferichter and G. Levati, “Light new physics and theτlepton dipole moments,” arXiv:2511.03786 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [26]

    An SU(2) Anomaly,

    E. Witten, “An SU(2) Anomaly,”Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 324–328. 25

    1982

  24. [27]

    A New SU(2) Anomaly,

    J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “A New SU(2) Anomaly,”J. Math. Phys.60no. 5, (2019) 052301,arXiv:1810.00844 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [28]

    The current status of fine-tuning in supersymmetry,

    M. van Beekveld, S. Caron, and R. Ruiz de Austri, “The current status of fine-tuning in supersymmetry,”JHEP01(2020) 147,arXiv:1906.10706 [hep-ph]. [29]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for heavy long-lived multi-charged particles in the full LHC Run 2ppcollision data at √s= 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector,”arXiv:2303.13613 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [30]

    Minimal dark matter,

    M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, “Minimal dark matter,”Nucl. Phys. B753(2006) 178–194,arXiv:hep-ph/0512090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [31]

    Quark-universal U(1) breaking scalar at the LHC,

    L. Armbruster, B. A. Dobrescu, and F. Yu, “Quark-universal U(1) breaking scalar at the LHC,” JHEP02(2026) 093,arXiv:2506.06068 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [32]

    Searching for Axionlike Particles in Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Processes,

    E. Izaguirre, T. Lin, and B. Shuve, “Searching for Axionlike Particles in Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Processes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118no. 11, (2017) 111802,arXiv:1611.09355 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [33]

    Dispersive analysis ofB→K (∗) and Bs →ϕform factors,

    N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, “Dispersive analysis ofB→K (∗) and Bs →ϕform factors,”JHEP12(2023) 153,arXiv:2305.06301 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 125 (2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [34]

    Extractions of —V ub—/—Vcb— from a combined study of the exclusiveb→u(c)ℓ −νℓ decays,

    A. Biswas, S. Nandi, and I. Ray, “Extractions of —V ub—/—Vcb— from a combined study of the exclusiveb→u(c)ℓ −νℓ decays,”JHEP07(2023) 024,arXiv:2212.02528 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [35]

    K→πsemileptonic form factors withN f = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions,

    N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, “K→πsemileptonic form factors withN f = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 11, (2016) 114512, arXiv:1602.04113 [hep-lat]. [36]ETMCollaboration, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, G. Salerno, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, “Scalar and vector form factors ofD→π(K)ℓνdecays withN f = 2 ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [42]

    Z-boson decays into an invisible dark photon at the LHC, HL-LHC and future lepton colliders,

    M. Cobal, C. De Dominicis, M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, J. Magro, B. Mele, and G. Panizzo, “Z-boson decays into an invisible dark photon at the LHC, HL-LHC and future lepton colliders,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 035027,arXiv:2006.15945 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  33. [43]

    Search for new physics effects inν νγproduction at a Tera-Z factory,

    H. Denizli, A. Senol, and M. K¨ oksal, “Search for new physics effects inν νγproduction at a Tera-Z factory,”arXiv:2510.23065 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [44]

    The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model,

    A. J. Buras and E. Venturini, “The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 7, (2022) 615,arXiv:2203.11960 [hep-ph]. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [45]

    Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation,

    G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, “Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation,”JHEP09(2022) 148,arXiv:2206.14748 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [46]

    Workshop summary: Kaons@CERN 2023,

    G. Anzivinoet al., “Workshop summary: Kaons@CERN 2023,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 4, (2024) 377,arXiv:2311.02923 [hep-ph]. [47]NA62Collaboration, E. Cortina Gilet al., “Search forπ 0 decays to invisible particles,”JHEP02 (2021) 201,arXiv:2010.07644 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [48]

    New bound on the vectorial axion-down-strange coupling fromK + →π +ννdata,

    D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, C. Lazzeroni, D. Martinez Santos, J. C. Swallow, and C. Toni, “New bound on the vectorial axion-down-strange coupling fromK + →π +ννdata,”arXiv:2503.05865 [hep-ph]. [49]BelleCollaboration, J. Grygieret al., “Search forB→hν νdecays with semileptonic tagging at Belle,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 9, (2017) 091101,arXiv:1702.03224 [hep-ex]. [A...

    arXiv 2017

  38. [50]

    Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays,

    R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, “Interplay of dineutrino modes with semileptonic rare B-decays,”JHEP12(2021) 061,arXiv:2109.01675 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [51]

    Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion,

    J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, “Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 1, (2020) 015023,arXiv:2002.04623 [hep-ph]. [52]BESIIICollaboration, M. Ablikimet al., “Observation of the leptonic decayD + →τ +ντ ,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123no. 21, (2019) 211802,arXiv:1908.08877 [hep-ex]. [53]BESIIIColla...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [54]

    Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator,

    X.-C. Aiet al., “Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator,” Nucl. Sci. Tech.36no. 12, (2025) 242,arXiv:2509.11522 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [55]

    Flavor Phenomenology of Light Dark Sectors,

    J. Martin Camalich and R. Ziegler, “Flavor Phenomenology of Light Dark Sectors,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75no. 1, (2025) 223–246,arXiv:2503.17323 [hep-ph]. [56]HPQCDCollaboration, W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies, “Standard Model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ-, B→Kℓ1-ℓ2+ and B→Kνν¯using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 1...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [57]

    RevisitingB→K(∗)ννdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,

    D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, “RevisitingB→K(∗)ννdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 3, (2023) 252,arXiv:2301.06990 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [58]

    Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,

    W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, “Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 075008,arXiv:2311.14629 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [59]

    Impact of new invisible particles onB→K (∗)Emiss observables,

    P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Impact of new invisible particles onB→K (∗)Emiss observables,”arXiv:2503.19025 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  45. [60]

    TheB + →K +ννdecay as a search for the QCD axion,

    M. Abumusabh, G. Dujany, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, and C. Toni, “TheB + →K +ννdecay as a search for the QCD axion,”arXiv:2510.18953 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [61]

    Constraints on invisibleB + →K +Xdecays from the Belle IIB + →K +ννmeasurement,

    L. G¨ artner, N. Krug, T. Kuhr, M. A. Schmidt, S. Stefkova, and B. Yabsley, “Constraints on invisibleB + →K +Xdecays from the Belle IIB + →K +ννmeasurement,”arXiv:2602.09666 [hep-ph]. [62]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV collecte...

    arXiv 2020

  47. [65]

    Constraints on the oblique parameters and related theories

    Gfitter, “Constraints on the oblique parameters and related theories.” https://project-gfitter.web.cern.ch/Oblique_Parameters/

  48. [66]

    Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions,

    L. Allwicher, P. Arnan, D. Barducci, and M. Nardecchia, “Perturbative unitarity constraints on generic Yukawa interactions,”JHEP10(2021) 129,arXiv:2108.00013 [hep-ph]. [67]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetyanet al., “Search for supersymmetry in final states with disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions ats= 13 TeV,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 7, (2024) 072007,a...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  49. [69]

    The last complex WIMPs standing,

    S. Bottaro, D. Buttazzo, M. Costa, R. Franceschini, P. Panci, D. Redigolo, and L. Vittorio, “The last complex WIMPs standing,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 11, (2022) 992,arXiv:2205.04486 [hep-ph]. [70]LZCollaboration, J. Aalberset al., “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 1, (2025) ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [71]

    Millicharge or Decay: A Critical Take on Minimal Dark Matter,

    E. Del Nobile, M. Nardecchia, and P. Panci, “Millicharge or Decay: A Critical Take on Minimal Dark Matter,”JCAP04(2016) 048,arXiv:1512.05353 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [72]

    Closing the window on WIMP Dark Matter,

    S. Bottaro, D. Buttazzo, M. Costa, R. Franceschini, P. Panci, D. Redigolo, and L. Vittorio, “Closing the window on WIMP Dark Matter,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 1, (2022) 31, arXiv:2107.09688 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [73]

    Electroweak precision observables and Higgs-boson signal strengths in the Standard Model and beyond: present and future,

    J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, “Electroweak precision observables and Higgs-boson signal strengths in the Standard Model and beyond: present and future,”JHEP12(2016) 135,arXiv:1608.01509 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [74]

    Electroweak Dark Matter at Future Hadron Colliders,

    T. Han, S. Mukhopadhyay, and X. Wang, “Electroweak Dark Matter at Future Hadron Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 3, (2018) 035026,arXiv:1805.00015 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [75]

    Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks,

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello, and J. Zurita, “Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks,”JHEP06(2021) 133,arXiv:2102.11292 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [76]

    Report from Working Group 3: Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,

    X. Cid Vidalet al., “Report from Working Group 3: Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC,”CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7(2019) 585–865,arXiv:1812.07831 [hep-ph]. [77]CMSCollaboration, V. Khachatryanet al., “Search for long-lived charged particles in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 11, (2016) 112004, arXiv:1609.0838...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [78]

    E. J. Barbeau,Pell’s Equation. Problem Books in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003

    2003

  57. [79]

    Pell’s method

    S. Scacco, “Pell’s method.” Available here, 2026. GitHub repository. [80]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb −1 of √s=13 TeVppcollision data with the ATLAS detector,”JHEP02(2021) 143,arXiv:2010.14293 [hep-ex]. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026