Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Linearly Polarized Light-Induced Anomalous Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transitions in an Altermagnetic Topological Insulator

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-15 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read Linearly polarized light induces an anomalous Hall effect only in altermagnets and can turn their quantum spin Hall state into a fully spin-polarized Chern insulator.

desk verdict Clean symmetry argument that LPL alone can induce anisotropic AHE and a spin-polarized Chern phase only in d-wave AMs; high-frequency truncation is the main unquantified caveat, not a collapse of the claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.06486 v3 pith:7CFWD5MZ submitted 2026-03-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetFloquetengineeringlinearlypolarizedlightanomalousHalleffectquantumspinCherninsulatortopologicalphasetransitionspin-polarizededgestates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnets have zero net magnetization like ordinary antiferromagnets, yet their spin-up and spin-down bands are related by a crystal rotation plus time reversal rather than by parity-time symmetry. The authors show that shining linearly polarized light, which preserves parity-time symmetry, therefore leaves ordinary antiferromagnets spin-degenerate and Hall-silent, while the same light breaks the rotation-plus-time-reversal link in a d-wave altermagnet. The result is a finite, polarization-direction-dependent anomalous Hall conductivity that appears only in the altermagnet, together with a sequential topological transition: the altermagnetic quantum spin Hall insulator first becomes a fully spin-polarized Chern insulator and only later a trivial insulator. Because the Hall response and the intermediate Chern phase are absent in conventional antiferromagnets, light-driven transport offers a practical experimental fingerprint that distinguishes the two classes and a route to dissipationless spin-polarized edge currents.

What carries the argument

The high-frequency Floquet effective Hamiltonian obtained from Peierls substitution of linearly polarized light into a four-band square-lattice model; for linear polarization the 1/ω commutator sum vanishes, so the light simply renormalizes hoppings by Bessel functions J0(A0 cos θ) and J0(A0 sin θ), thereby selectively breaking C4zT while preserving PT.

What would settle it

Measure the anomalous Hall conductivity of a candidate d-wave altermagnetic film under linearly polarized light of variable intensity and polarization angle; a finite, d-wave-anisotropic Hall signal that reverses with polarization angle, together with an intermediate spin-polarized Chern phase, would confirm the claim, while a null result identical to a conventional antiferromagnet would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Linearly polarized light breaks the C4zT (or Mxy) symmetry that equates spin-up and spin-down bands in a d-wave altermagnet while leaving PT intact in a conventional antiferromagnet; consequently only the altermagnet develops a finite, polarization-anisotropic anomalous Hall conductivity and can be driven through a fully spin-polarized Chern insulating phase (C = ±1) before becoming trivial.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the high-frequency limit in which multi-photon corrections, heating, and Floquet sideband occupations can be ignored, so that the effective static Hamiltonian alone controls the Hall conductivity and topology.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polarization-dependent Hall measurements under linear light become a transport-based diagnostic that can separate altermagnets from conventional antiferromagnets without requiring spin-resolved spectroscopy.
  • An altermagnetic quantum spin Hall material can be optically switched into a spin-polarized quantum anomalous Hall state whose edge currents are fully spin-polarized and dissipationless.
  • Rotating the linear polarization continuously tunes both the magnitude and the sign of the anomalous Hall conductivity, offering an all-optical control knob for Hall devices.
  • When the polarization lies along a mirror plane the intermediate Chern phase is suppressed, recovering the direct trivialization path of ordinary antiferromagnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the same light leaves ordinary antiferromagnets Hall-silent, any observed light-induced Hall signal in a collinear zero-magnetization candidate would itself be strong evidence of altermagnetic order.
  • The intermediate fully spin-polarized Chern phase could serve as a transient platform for spin-filtered edge transport that is switched on and off by light intensity alone.
  • Finite-frequency corrections or heating that destroy the high-frequency truncation would first erode the predicted Hall anisotropy, providing a practical experimental bound on the usable drive regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Floquet engineering of a two-dimensional d-wave altermagnetic (AM) topological insulator under linearly polarized light (LPL). Using a four-band square-lattice model that interpolates between conventional AFM (ta=1, PT-symmetric) and d-wave AM (ta eq1, C4zT-related spin channels), the authors derive the high-frequency effective Hamiltonian via Peierls substitution and Floquet averaging (Eqs. 6–7). They show that LPL preserves PT and therefore leaves AFMs spin-degenerate with vanishing anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC), while it breaks C4zT/Mxy in AMs, inducing a finite, polarization-anisotropic AHC (Fig. 3) and driving an AM quantum spin Hall insulator through an intermediate fully spin-polarized Chern phase (C=±1) before a trivial insulator (Fig. 4). Edge-state spectra and a phase diagram in the (Ã0,θ) plane support the claimed sequence.

Significance. If the high-frequency results survive under realistic drive conditions, the work supplies a clean, symmetry-based optical protocol that distinguishes altermagnets from conventional antiferromagnets and realizes a light-tunable, fully spin-polarized Chern insulator without circular polarization. The contrast between PT-protected AFM and C4zT-broken AM responses is conceptually sharp, the calculations (Chern numbers, Berry-curvature AHC, ribbon edge states) are standard and internally consistent, and the polarization anisotropy of σxy offers a falsifiable experimental signature. These features make the paper a useful contribution to Floquet control of altermagnetic topology and to the broader search for dissipationless spintronic platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. II B (after Eq. 5) and all subsequent results rest on the high-frequency truncation Heff(k)≈H0(k). The authors correctly note that LPL satisfies A(t)=A(-t+τ), so the 1/ω commutator sum vanishes, leaving only Bessel-renormalized hoppings j1=J0(Ã0 cos θ), j2=J0(Ã0 sin θ). Finite-frequency multi-photon processes, Floquet sideband occupation, and heating are never quantified. Because the claimed finite AHC (Fig. 3) and the intermediate C=±1 Chern phase (Fig. 4c,e) are obtained entirely from this static Heff, the manuscript should either (i) estimate the frequency window in which the truncation remains accurate for the chosen parameters, or (ii) present at least one finite-ω Floquet calculation (e.g., quasienergy spectrum or time-averaged AHC) that confirms the AHC and Chern sequence survive outside the formal ω o∞ limit.
  2. Sec. III B states that two methods were used for the AHC—“a direct computation of the Berry curvature integral within the high-frequency approximation and an alternative approach based on Floquet state occupations”—yet only the high-frequency Berry-curvature results (Eqs. 8–9, Fig. 3) are shown. The Floquet-occupation calculation is never presented or compared. Given that occupation of Floquet sidebands can alter the measured Hall response even when the effective Hamiltonian is accurate, the second method should be reported (or the claim removed) so that the robustness of the predicted AHC can be assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 2 caption and panels: the Fermi-surface plots (b,e) are shown only for the AM; a corresponding AFM panel would make the PT-protected degeneracy more visually immediate.
  2. Eq. (2) and surrounding text: the Chern-number integral is written for a two-component d-vector; a brief reminder that the full four-band Hamiltonian is block-diagonal in spin would help readers unfamiliar with the model.
  3. Fig. 4(e) phase diagram: the color boundaries between C=1 and C=-1 regions are sharp; stating the numerical resolution used for gap-closing detection would improve reproducibility.
  4. Throughout: “altermagnet topological insulator” and “AM QSH insulator” are used interchangeably; a single consistent term would reduce minor ambiguity.
  5. References: several recent Floquet-altermagnet works (e.g., light-induced odd-parity magnetism, CPL-induced QAH) are cited; a short comparative sentence in the introduction clarifying how LPL differs from those CPL protocols would strengthen the novelty statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: AHC, spin splitting, and QSH-to-Chern-to-trivial sequence are computed from an explicit lattice model plus high-frequency Floquet averaging, not forced by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper defines a four-band square-lattice Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) that interpolates between PT-symmetric AFM (ta=1) and C4zT-related d-wave AM (ta eq1), applies the Peierls substitution for LPL, and obtains Heff(k) o H0(k) with Bessel-renormalized hoppings because the LPL vector potential satisfies A(t)=A(-t+ au) so the 1/ω commutator sum vanishes (Sec. II B after Eq. 5). All subsequent results—lifting of Γ–M degeneracy (Fig. 2d), finite anisotropic σxy (Fig. 3), sequential spin-resolved gap closings that produce an intermediate C=±1 phase (Fig. 4c,e)—are direct numerical evaluations of Berry curvature and Chern numbers on this static Heff. No parameters are fitted to the target observables; the high-frequency truncation is an explicit approximation whose validity is not circularly assumed from the claimed AHE itself. Self-citations supply background models or prior Floquet methods but are not load-bearing for the LPL-induced distinction between AM and AFM. The derivation is therefore self-contained against its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are model-theoretic: they inherit standard Floquet and topological-band machinery, plus a hand-tuned four-band d-wave AM Hamiltonian. No new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters set the magnetic gap, altermagnetic anisotropy, and light strength; axioms are the high-frequency truncation and the spin-decoupled lattice model.

free parameters (5)
  • m (on-site magnetic potential) = 0.38–0.42 eV (examples)
    Hand-chosen (e.g. 0.38 or 0.42 eV) to place the system in QSH or trivial regimes; controls band inversion at Γ.
  • b (orbital hopping scale) = −0.1 or −0.2 eV
    Hand-chosen (e.g. −0.1 or −0.2 eV) with m to set topology; not derived from a material.
  • ta (x–y anisotropy) = √3 (AM) or 1 (AFM)
    ta=√3 for AM, ta=1 for AFM; chosen to open d-wave spin splitting, not fitted to experiment.
  • v (inter-orbital hopping) = 0.1 eV
    Set to 0.1 eV for simplicity; overall energy unit of the model.
  • Ã0 and θ (dimensionless light amplitude and polarization angle) = Ã0 ~ 0–1.5; θ scanned
    Drive parameters scanned to produce AHC and phase diagrams; physical intensity and frequency left unspecified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption High-frequency Floquet expansion: for LPL, ∑[Hn,H−n]/(nω)=0 so Heff≈H0 up to O(1/ω²).
    Sec. II B after Eq. (5); load-bearing for all effective-band and topology results.
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution k→k+eA(t)/ℏ with A(t)=A0[cosθ cos(ωt), sinθ cos(ωt)] captures the light–matter coupling.
    Standard minimal coupling used to obtain the Bessel-renormalized hoppings.
  • domain assumption Four-band spin-decoupled Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with H↓(kx,ky)=H↑(ky,kx) and ta≠1 realizes a d-wave AM topological insulator.
    Sec. II A; model taken from prior AM TI literature [50,59] and used as the sole microscopic platform.
  • standard math Topology is diagnosed by independent spin Chern numbers Cσ from the d-vector winding (Eq. 2) and by ribbon edge states.
    Standard 2D two-band Chern formula applied per spin block.
  • ad hoc to paper Regime |m|>max{|b|ta²,|b|} and m·b<0 so CBM/VBM and gap closings sit near Γ.
    Sec. II B end; chosen so Floquet-driven transitions are easy to track; not generic for all AMs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Linearly Polarized Light-Induced Anomalous Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transitions in an Altermagnetic Topological Insulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7CFWD5MZ

@misc{pith2026260306486,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Linearly Polarized Light-Induced Anomalous Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transitions in an Altermagnetic Topological Insulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7CFWD5MZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.06486}
}
abstract

A recently identified class of collinear magnetic order, characterized by vanishing net magnetization yet unconventional spin splitting, known as altermagnets (AMs), has attracted significant research interest. Controlling the unconventional spin splitting and the associated band topology in AMs offers opportunities for realizing novel spin and topological transport phenomena. In this work, using Floquet engineering with periodically driven linearly polarized light (LPL), we explore light-induced control of an AM topological insulator. Remarkably, we find that AMs and conventional antiferromagnets (AFMs) exhibit distinct responses under LPL irradiation. Specifically, since LPL breaks neither time-reversal ($\mathcal{T}$) symmetry nor parity-time-reversal ($\mathcal{PT}$) symmetry, it is incapable of generating spin splitting or inducing an anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in conventional AFMs. In contrast, AMs intrinsically lack both $\mathcal{T}$ and $\mathcal{PT}$ symmetries. Their spin-up and spin-down bands are related by the combined symmetry of time reversal $\mathcal{T}$ and a crystal rotation. We show that LPL readily breaks these symmetries, thereby triggering a finite AHE exclusively in AMs. Furthermore, LPL can drive the AM topological insulator into a fully spin-polarized Chern insulating phase. Our findings not only provide a robust experimental scheme to distinguish AMs from conventional AFMs, but also establish a promising pathway toward dissipationless spintronic applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Light-Induced Topological Phase Transitions and Anomalous Thermal Transport in d-Wave Altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Linearly polarized light breaks spin-sector symmetry in d-wave altermagnets, inducing transitions from quantum spin Hall to spin-polarized Chern insulator to trivial states, with all anomalous transport coefficients s...

  2. Floquet-induced anisotropic magnetoresistance and anomalous Hall effect in 2D $d$-wave altermagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Floquet driving in 2D d-wave altermagnets with Rashba SOC induces out-of-plane magnetization and equilibrium-forbidden AMR and AHE.

  3. Light-Induced Topological Phase Transitions and Anomalous Thermal Transport in d-Wave Altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Linearly polarized light induces spin-selective topological phase transitions in d-wave altermagnets, with quantized thermal and electrical Hall responses satisfying the Wiedemann-Franz law.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

  3. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antifer- romagnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Cou- pling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022). 7

  4. [4]

    C. He, Z. Wen, J. Okabayashi, Y. Miura, T. Ma, T. Ohkubo, T. Seki, H. Sukegawa, and S. Mitani, Evi- dence for single variant in altermagnetic RuO2(101) thin films, Nat. Commun.16, 8235 (2025)

  5. [5]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094425 (2024)

  6. [6]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Smejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. J. Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Di- rect observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

  7. [7]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the alter- magnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    I. I. Mazin, Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100418 (2023)

  2. [10]

    Krempasky, L

    J. Krempasky, L. Smejkal, S. W. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

  3. [11]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Smejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermag- netic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

  4. [12]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

  5. [13]

    Leivisk¨ a, J

    M. Leivisk¨ a, J. Rial, A. Bad’ura, R. L. Seeger, I. Kounta, S. Beckert, D. Kriegner, I. Joumard, E. Schmoranzerov´ a, J. Sinova, O. Gomonay, A. Thomas, S. T. B. Goennenwein, H. Reichlov´ a, L. Smejkal, L. Michez, T. Jungwirth, and V. Baltz, Anisotropy of the anomalous Hall ef...

  6. [14]

    Reichlova, R

    H. Reichlova, R. L. Seeger, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lammel, M. Leivisk¨ a, A. B. Hellenes,et al., Obser- vation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn5Si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate, Nat. Commun. 15, 4961 (2024)

  7. [15]

    J. Rial, M. Leivisk¨ a, G. Skobjin, A. Bad’ura, G. Gaudin, F. Disdier, R. Schlitz, I. Kounta, S. Beckert, D. Krieg- ner, A. Thomas, E. Schmoranzerov´ a, L. Smejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, L. Michez, H. Reichlov´ a, S. T. B. Goennenwein, O. Gomonay, and V. Baltz, Al- termagne...

  8. [16]

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, dc Joseph- son effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076003 (2023)

  9. [17]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermag- nets, Nat. Commun.15, 1801 (2024)

  10. [18]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Orientation- dependent Josephson effect in spin-singlet superconductor/altermagnet/spin-triplet supercon- ductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B109, 024517 (2024)

  11. [19]

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Andreev reflection in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 054511 (2023)

  12. [20]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106701 (2024)

  13. [21]

    Qin and R

    F. Qin and R. Chen, Layer Hall effect induced by alter- magnetism, arXiv (2026), 2601.03937

  14. [22]

    R. Chen, B. Zhou, and D.-H. Xu, Quasicrystalline al- termagnetism, arXiv (2025), 2507.18408

  15. [23]

    Z.-Y. Shao, C. Lu, Z. Pan, Y.-B. Liu, and F. Yang, Classification of magnetism and altermagnetism in qua- sicrystals, arXiv (2025), 2508.15702

  16. [24]

    Y. Li, M. Pan, J. Leng, Y. Chen, and H. Huang, Uncon- ventional altermagnetism in quasicrystals: A hyperspa- tial projective construction, arXiv (2025), 2508.01564

  17. [25]

    Lin, S.-B

    H.-J. Lin, S.-B. Zhang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Coulomb drag in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 136301 (2025)

  18. [26]

    Z.-M. Wang, Y. Zhang, S.-B. Zhang, J.-H. Sun, E. Dagotto, D.-H. Xu, and L.-H. Hu, Spin-orbital al- termagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 176705 (2025)

  19. [27]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

  20. [28]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin cur- rent, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

  21. [29]

    D. Wang, H. Wang, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Electric-field-induced switchable two-dimensional alter- magnets, Nano Lett.25, 498 (2024)

  22. [30]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

  23. [31]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room- temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

  24. [32]

    C. Xu, S. Wu, G.-X. Zhi, G. Cao, J. Dai, C. Cao, X. Wang, and H.-Q. Lin, Altermagnetic ground state in distorted Kagome metal CsCr 3Sb5, Nat. Commun. 16, 3114 (2025)

  25. [33]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

  26. [34]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik,et al., Electrical switching of ap- wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

  27. [35]

    Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

  28. [36]

    W.-T. Guo, J. Xu, Y. Yang, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, Al- termagnetic type-II multiferroics with N´ eel-order-locked electric polarization, arXiv (2025), 2505.01964

  29. [37]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- 8 magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

  30. [38]

    D. Wang, T. Zhu, and Z. Yang, Hyperbolic altermagnets with high-fold spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B113, 064424 (2026)

  31. [39]

    P.-H. Fu, Q. Lv, Y. Xu, J. Cayao, J.-F. Liu, and X.-L. Yu, All-electrically controlled spintronics in altermag- netic heterostructures, npj Quantum Mater.10, 111 (2025)

  32. [40]

    Yamada, M

    R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, M. Ezawa, T. Nomoto, J. Masell, Y. Ishihara,et al., A metallic p-wave magnet with com- mensurate spin helix, Nature646, 837 (2025)

  33. [41]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

  34. [42]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band struc- tures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B102, 144441 (2020)

  35. [43]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

  36. [44]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and represen- tation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

  37. [45]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

  38. [46]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

  39. [47]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thia- garajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu, C. Fulga, M. G. Vergniory, O. Janson, O. Tjernberg, and J. van den Brink, Topological Weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Commun. Phys.8, 311 (2025)

  40. [48]

    Wan and Q.-F

    Y.-H. Wan and Q.-F. Sun, Altermagnetism-induced par- ity anomaly in weak topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B111, 045407 (2025)

  41. [49]

    P. Rao, A. Mook, and J. Knolle, Tunable band topology and optical conductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024425 (2024)

  42. [50]

    Ma and J.-F

    H.-Y. Ma and J.-F. Jia, Altermagnetic topological insu- lator and the selection rules, Phys. Rev. B110, 064426 (2024)

  43. [51]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Vender- bos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

  44. [52]

    Qu, X.-Y

    S. Qu, X.-Y. Hou, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Altermagnetic Weyl node-network metals protected by spin symmetry, Phys. Rev. B111, 195138 (2025)

  45. [53]

    Parshukov, R

    K. Parshukov, R. Wiedmann, and A. P. Schnyder, Topo- logical crossings in two-dimensional altermagnets: Sym- metry classification and topological responses, Phys. Rev. B111, 224406 (2025)

  46. [54]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 024404 (2024)

  47. [55]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipula- tion of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201109 (2024)

  48. [56]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-II quantum spin Hall insulator, arXiv (2025), 2503.13397

  49. [57]

    Z. Chen, F. Zhan, Z. Qin, D.-S. Ma, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Quantum spin Hall effect with extended topo- logically protected features in altermagnetic multilayers, arXiv (2025), 2508.03580

  50. [58]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Duan, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Quantized spin-Hall conductivity in altermag- net Fe2Te2O with mirror-spin coupling, arXiv (2025), 2503.10681

  51. [59]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, H

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, H. Serrano, and B. Uribe, Spin Chern number in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 085127 (2025)

  52. [60]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez and B

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez and B. Uribe, Model Hamilto- nian for altermagnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B112, 184101 (2025)

  53. [61]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nat. Phys.7, 490 (2011)

  54. [62]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

  55. [63]

    Yan and Z

    Z. Yan and Z. Wang, Tunable Weyl points in periodi- cally driven nodal line semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 087402 (2016)

  56. [64]

    H¨ ubener, M

    H. H¨ ubener, M. A. Sentef, U. De Giovannini, A. F. Kemper, and A. Rubio, Creating stable Floquet-Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials, Nat. Commun.8, 13940 (2017)

  57. [65]

    L. Zhou, C. Chen, and J. Gong, Floquet semimetal with Floquet-band holonomy, Phys. Rev. B94, 075443 (2016)

  58. [66]

    Liu, J.-T

    H. Liu, J.-T. Sun, C. Cheng, F. Liu, and S. Meng, Pho- toinduced nonequilibrium topological states in strained black phosphorus, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 237403 (2018)

  59. [67]

    G´ omez-Le´ on and G

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on and G. Platero, Floquet-Bloch theory and topology in periodically driven lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200403 (2013)

  60. [68]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspon- dence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

  61. [69]

    Ezawa, Photoinduced topological phase transition and a single Dirac-cone state in silicene, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Photoinduced topological phase transition and a single Dirac-cone state in silicene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 026603 (2013)

  62. [70]

    A. G. Grushin, ´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, and T. Neupert, Flo- quet fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 156801 (2014)

  63. [71]

    Mahmood, C.-K

    F. Mahmood, C.-K. Chan, Z. Alpichshev, D. Gardner, Y. Lee, P. A. Lee, and N. Gedik, Selective scattering be- tween Floquet-Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator, Nat. Phys.12, 306 (2016)

  64. [72]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quan- tum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387 (2019)

  65. [73]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Brillouin-Wigner theory for high-frequency expansion in periodically driven systems: Application to Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 144307 (2016). 9

  66. [74]

    Eckardt and E

    A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, High-frequency approx- imation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective, New J. Phys.17, 093039 (2015)

  67. [75]

    X. Ma, L. Sun, J. Liu, and M. Zhao, Floquet-engineered half-valley-metal state in two-dimensional gapped-Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B104, 155439 (2021)

  68. [76]

    H. Wang, M. Chen, R. W. Bomantara, J. Gong, and D. Xing, Line nodes and surface Majorana flat bands in static and kicked p-wave superconducting Harper model, Phys. Rev. B95, 075136 (2017)

  69. [77]

    R. W. Bomantara and J. Gong, Simulation of non- Abelian braiding in Majorana time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 230405 (2018)

  70. [78]

    Nag and B

    T. Nag and B. Roy, Anomalous and normal disloca- tion modes in Floquet topological insulators, Commun. Phys.4, 157 (2021)

  71. [79]

    A. K. Ghosh, T. Nag, and A. Saha, Systematic genera- tion of the cascade of anomalous dynamical first- and higher-order modes in Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B105, 115418 (2022)

  72. [80]

    T. V. Trevisan, P. V. Arribi, O. Heinonen, R.-J. Slager, and P. P. Orth, Bicircular light Floquet engineering of magnetic symmetry and topology and its application to the Dirac semimetal Cd 3As2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 066602 (2022)

  73. [81]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 33 (2022)

  74. [82]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 229 (2020)

  75. [83]

    Bielinski, R

    N. Bielinski, R. Chari, J. May-Mann, S. Kim, J. Zwet- tler, Y. Deng, A. Aishwarya, S. Roychowdhury, C. Shekhar, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, J. Yan, C. Felser, V. Madhavan, Z.-X. Shen, T. L. Hughes, and F. Mah- mood, Floquet–Bloch manipulation of the Dirac gap in a topological antifer...

  76. [84]

    Y. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, J. Zhu, K. Wu,et al., Observa- tion of Floquet states and their dephasing in colloidal nanoplatelets driven by visible pulses, Nat. Photon.18, 1044 (2024)

  77. [85]

    Merboldt, M

    M. Merboldt, M. Sch¨ uler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, S. R. Manmana, M. A. Sentef, M. Reutzel, S. Mathias,et al., Observation of Floquet states in graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1093 (2025)

  78. [86]

    Ma, J.-W

    Q. Ma, J.-W. You, L. Chen, Z. Gu, S.-L. Qin, Z. Lan, and T.-J. Cui, Floquet topological states in time-varying metasurfaces, Sci. Adv.11, eadx9025 (2025)

  79. [87]

    D. Choi, M. Mogi, U. De Giovannini, D. Azoury, B. Lv, Y. Su, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, others, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet-Bloch states in mono- layer graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1100 (2025)

  80. [88]

    B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Zhou, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Floquet optical selec- tion rules in black phosphorus, Sci. Adv.11, eadw2744 (2025)

  81. [89]

    R. Li, X. Zou, Z. Chen, X. Feng, B. Huang, Y. Dai, and C. Niu, Floquet engineering of the orbital Hall effect and valleytronics in two-dimensional topological mag- nets, Mater. Horiz.11, 3819 (2024)

  82. [90]

    T. Zhu, H. Ni, B. Wei, and H. Wang, Manipulating topo- logical states in multi-weyl semimetals by off-resonant light: Theory and material realization, Phys. Rev. B 110, 235160 (2024)

  83. [91]

    F. Zhan, Z. Ning, L.-Y. Gan, B. Zheng, J. Fan, and R. Wang, Floquet valley-polarized quantum anomalous Hall state in nonmagnetic heterobilayers, Phys. Rev. B 105, L081115 (2022)

  84. [92]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

  85. [93]

    Kitagawa, T

    T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall in- sulators without Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

  86. [94]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 38 (2020)

  87. [95]

    H. Xu, J. Zhou, and J. Li, Light-induced quantum anomalous Hall effect on the 2D surfaces of 3D topo- logical insulators, Adv. Sci.8, 2101508 (2021)

  88. [96]

    X. Kong, W. Luo, L. Li, M. Yoon, T. Berlijn, and L. Liang, Floquet band engineering and topological phase transitions in 1T ′ transition metal dichalco- genides, 2D Mater.9, 025005 (2022)

  89. [97]

    Z. Ning, B. Zheng, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Photoin- duced quantum anomalous Hall states in the topological Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. B105, 035103 (2022)

  90. [98]

    Z. F. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Yang, and F. Liu, Light-induced Type-II band inversion and quantum anomalous Hall state in monolayer FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 156406 (2018)

  91. [99]

    H. H. Yap, L. Zhou, J.-S. Wang, and J. Gong, Com- putational study of the two-terminal transport of Flo- quet quantum Hall insulators, Phys. Rev. B96, 165443 (2017)

  92. [100]

    T. Zhu, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, Floquet engineering of magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4 films, Phys. Rev. B107, 085151 (2023)

  93. [101]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Univer- sal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven sys- tems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineer- ing, Adv. Phys.64, 139 (2015)

  94. [102]

    Q. Chen, L. Du, and G. A. Fiete, Floquet band structure of a semi-Dirac system, Phys. Rev. B97, 035422 (2018)

  95. [103]

    H.-G. Min, C. J. Roh, C. Kim, and Y. Kim, Transition- selective photocurrents in Floquet-driven monolayer MoSe2, npj 2D Mater. Appl.10, 32 (2026)

  96. [104]

    T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Floquet odd-parity collinear magnets, arXiv (2025), 2508.02542

  97. [105]

    Huang, Z

    S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, Light-induced Odd-parity Magnetism in Con- ventional Collinear Antiferromagnets, arXiv (2025), 2507.20705

  98. [106]

    Liu, Z.-Y

    D. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light- induced odd-parity altermagnets on dimerized lattices, Phys. Rev. B113, L060409 (2026)

  99. [107]

    Z. Li, L. Li, M. Guan, and S. Meng, Stacking-sliding and irradiation-direction invariant Floquet altermag- nets in A-type antiferromagnetic bilayers, arXiv (2025), 2512.06416

  100. [108]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi and Q. Li, Dynamical Generation of Higher-Order Spin-Orbit Coupling, Topology, and Per- sistent Spin Texture in Light-Irradiated Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236702 (2025). 10

  101. [109]

    P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Floquet engineering spin triplet states in unconventional magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 066703 (2026)

  102. [110]

    P.-H. Fu, S. Mondal, J.-F. Liu, and J. Cayao, Light- induced Floquet spin-triplet Cooper pairs in unconven- tional magnets, SciPost Phys.20, 059 (2026)

  103. [111]

    X. Zou, X. Feng, C. Niu, Y. Dai, and B. Huang, Floquet quantum anomalous Hall effect with in-plane magneti- zation in two-dimensional altermagnets, ACS Nano19, 35575 (2025)

  104. [112]

    Ganguli, A

    M. Ganguli, A. Jana, and A. Narayan, Tunable topol- ogy, Hall response, and spin-textures in bicircularly po- larized light illuminated altermagnets, arXiv (2025), 2509.06349

  105. [113]

    Qin and X.-B

    F. Qin and X.-B. Qiang, Anomalous thermoelectric and thermal Hall effects in irradiated altermagnets, arXiv (2026), 2602.05745

  106. [114]

    D. Wang, A. K. Ghosh, Y. Tao, F. Ma, and C. Song, Emerging of Anomalous Higher-Order Topo- logical Phases in Altermagnet/Topological Insulator Heterostructure by Floquet Engineering, Adv. Sci. , e22203 (2026)

  107. [115]

    B. Pan, P. Zhou, Y. Hu, S. Liu, B. Zhou, H. Xiao, X. Yang, and L. Sun, Floquet-induced altermagnetic transition in A-type antiferromagnetic bilayers, Phys. Rev. B112, 224430 (2025)

  108. [116]

    Li, D.-F

    B. Li, D.-F. Shao, and A. A. Kovalev, Floquet spin splitting and spin generation in antiferromagnets, arXiv (2025), 2507.22884

  109. [117]

    Yarmohammadi, U

    M. Yarmohammadi, U. Z¨ ulicke, J. Berakdar, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Anisotropic light-tailored RKKY interaction in two-dimensional d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 224412 (2025)

  110. [118]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    M. Yarmohammadi, P.-H. Fu, and J. K. Freericks, Effi- cient two-color Floquet control of the RKKY interaction in altermagnets, arXiv (2026), 2602.20862

  111. [119]

    Yarmohammadi, M

    M. Yarmohammadi, M. Berritta, M. Bukov, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Linder, and P. M. Oppeneer, Spin polarization en- gineering ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B113, L060403 (2026)

  112. [120]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

  113. [121]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

Pith tools

Reviewed July 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.