Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 cited by

Dissipative phase transitions in driven open quantum systems are diagnosed by the Floquet propagator spectrum, not the static Liouvillian.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 21:54 UTC pith:LPN7XE5L

load-bearing objection We only have the abstract; the supplied full text is an unrelated cosmology paper, so the Floquet-propagator DPT claims cannot be audited. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.13030 v2 pith:LPN7XE5L submitted 2026-03-13 quant-ph

Floquet Dissipative Phase Transitions

classification quant-ph
keywords dissipative phase transitionsFloquet propagatoropen quantum systemsdriven-dissipative Kerr resonatorquantum Rabi modelultrastrong couplinglight-matter decouplingcritical slowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard theory locates dissipative phase transitions by watching the spectrum of a time-independent Liouvillian, but that tool fails for genuinely time-periodic open systems that cannot be rewritten as static problems. This paper supplies a general replacement: the spectrum of the Floquet propagator, whose gap closing signals critical slowing. Applied to driven-dissipative Kerr resonators, the method shows that counter-rotating drive terms both move the critical point and change the time scales of the transition. Applied to the driven quantum Rabi model, it reveals critical features that appear only in the ultrastrong-coupling regime and, deeper still, the complete disappearance of the transition once light and matter decouple. The framework therefore opens dissipative criticality to a wide class of time-dependent open quantum systems that were previously inaccessible.

Core claim

Dissipative phase transitions in time-periodic open quantum systems that cannot be exactly recast as time-independent problems are characterized through the spectrum of the Floquet propagator; this spectrum plays the role that the Liouvillian spectrum plays in the static case, revealing drive-induced shifts of criticality in Kerr resonators and the disappearance of a DPT in the deep strong-coupling Rabi model due to light-matter decoupling.

What carries the argument

The Floquet propagator (the stroboscopic one-period evolution superoperator of the open system) and its spectrum; gap closing or critical slowing of its eigenvalues is used as the diagnostic of dissipative criticality when no time-independent Liouvillian exists.

Load-bearing premise

That the spectrum of the Floquet propagator is a faithful and general diagnostic of dissipative criticality for open Floquet systems, analogous to the Liouvillian spectrum in the static case, without needing an exact mapping to a time-independent problem.

What would settle it

In a driven-dissipative Kerr resonator or Rabi model whose parameters can be tuned through the claimed critical point, measure whether the slowest relaxation time of the open system diverges (or the Floquet-propagator gap closes) exactly where the theory predicts, and whether that divergence disappears in the deep strong-coupling regime as light-matter decoupling sets in.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Counter-rotating drive terms must be retained when locating critical points and relaxation timescales of driven Kerr resonators; rotating-wave approximations shift both.
  • The driven quantum Rabi model develops distinct critical signatures once the ultrastrong-coupling regime is entered, unlike its Jaynes-Cummings approximation.
  • In the deep strong-coupling regime the dissipative phase transition of the Rabi model vanishes because light and matter decouple.
  • A broad class of time-dependent open quantum systems that previously lacked a Liouvillian description can now be analyzed for dissipative criticality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Floquet-propagator diagnostic should apply without change to multi-mode or lattice open Floquet systems, provided the one-period map can be computed or approximated.
  • Experimental platforms already used for static dissipative phase transitions (circuit QED, polariton condensates) can be re-driven periodically to test the predicted shift and disappearance of critical points.
  • Once the Floquet gap is established as the order parameter, finite-size scaling of that gap becomes the natural route to extract critical exponents of open Floquet systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The abstract proposes a general framework for dissipative phase transitions (DPTs) in time-periodic open quantum systems that cannot be recast as time-independent Liouvillian problems, diagnosing criticality from the spectrum of the Floquet propagator rather than a static Liouvillian. It claims this framework reveals (i) drive-induced shifts of the critical point and associated timescales in driven-dissipative Kerr resonators once counter-rotating terms are retained, and (ii) distinct ultrastrong-coupling critical features in the driven quantum Rabi model relative to its Jaynes–Cummings approximation, culminating in the disappearance of the DPT in the deep strong-coupling regime due to light–matter decoupling. The supplied full-text block, however, is an unrelated cosmology manuscript on two-loop EFTofLSS for Roman cosmic shear (arXiv:2603.13031), so none of the Floquet definitions, spectra, or numerical claims can be audited from the materials provided.

Significance. If the Floquet-propagator diagnostic is well-defined, unique, and shown to recover known static DPTs in appropriate limits while correctly capturing genuinely time-periodic criticality, the work would fill a clear methodological gap and open a broad class of driven open systems to dissipative criticality studies. The reported Kerr critical-point shift and the Rabi deep-strong-coupling disappearance would then be concrete, falsifiable predictions of physical interest. Those strengths cannot be credited from the present package because the load-bearing spectral definitions, gap-closing criteria, and comparisons are not present in the supplied full text.

major comments (3)
  1. Manuscript mismatch: the abstract and paper_id (2603.13030, Floquet DPTs) do not match the full manuscript text, which is an EFTofLSS cosmology paper on Roman weak lensing. No Floquet propagator, Liouvillian comparison, Kerr or Rabi spectra, or critical-point numerics appear in the provided full text. A technical review of the claimed framework is therefore impossible from the materials given.
  2. Abstract-level central claim: the spectrum of the one-period Floquet propagator is asserted as a general, faithful diagnostic of dissipative criticality (gap closing / critical slowing) for open Floquet systems without an exact static mapping. Without the methods section, spectral criterion, uniqueness argument, and recovery of known static DPTs, this premise remains definitional rather than demonstrated and underpins every reported result (Kerr shift; Rabi ultrastrong features; DPT disappearance).
  3. Unauditable results: claims that counter-rotating drive terms shift the Kerr critical point and change transition timescales, and that the Rabi DPT disappears in deep strong coupling via light–matter decoupling, cannot be checked for truncation artifacts, stroboscopic sampling dependence, or consistency with any Liouvillian limit. These are load-bearing for the paper’s scientific content and require the correct full manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No auditable Floquet derivation chain; cached full text is an unrelated EFTofLSS cosmology paper, so circularity cannot be established beyond a non-tautological abstract definition.

full rationale

The claimed paper (arXiv:2603.13030, Floquet Dissipative Phase Transitions) is represented only by its abstract. The CACHEABLE full manuscript is a completely different work (two-loop EFTofLSS for Roman cosmic shear). From the Floquet abstract alone, the central move is definitional framework-building: DPTs in time-periodic open systems are characterized by the spectrum of the Floquet propagator, by analogy with the static Liouvillian spectrum. That is a proposed diagnostic, not a prediction forced by fitting the same quantity it claims to predict, nor a uniqueness theorem imported from overlapping authors. Applications (Kerr critical-point shift from counter-rotating terms; Rabi vs Jaynes–Cummings ultrastrong features; DPT disappearance via light-matter decoupling) are stated as results of that analysis, but without Floquet-propagator definitions, gap-closing criteria, stroboscopic sampling details, or comparison to Liouvillian limits, no reduction of the form 'Eq. X = input by construction' can be exhibited. Per the hard rules, absence of an inspectable derivation chain is not grounds to invent circularity; residual risk that criticality is identified with the same spectral feature used to define it remains an unauditable correctness concern, not a demonstrated circular step. Score 1 reflects only that the abstract's framework is definitional by nature, not that a circular derivation was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review. Load-bearing ingredients are the standard open-system and Floquet setup plus the paper’s proposed identification of DPTs with Floquet-propagator spectral features. No free parameters or invented particles are stated in the abstract; the main ad hoc (to this paper) element is the diagnostic itself.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Open quantum dynamics of the systems considered are generated by a time-periodic Lindblad/Liouvillian master equation.
    Standard Markovian open-system setting implied by DPT and Floquet-propagator language in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Dissipative criticality can be diagnosed from spectral properties (gaps, slow modes) of the one-period Floquet propagator, generalizing the static Liouvillian spectrum.
    This is the framework the abstract introduces; it is not a theorem stated with proof in the available text.
  • domain assumption Counter-rotating terms and ultrastrong/deep-strong light-matter coupling are physically relevant and not always removable by rotating-wave approximations.
    Underpins the Kerr and Rabi case studies claimed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30528 in / 2323 out tokens · 26292 ms · 2026-07-14T21:54:48.641010+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dissipative phase transitions (DPTs) are traditionally characterized through the spectrum of a time-independent Liouvillian superoperator. However, this definition does not apply to time-periodic (Floquet) systems that cannot be exactly recast as time-independent problems. Here, we develop a general framework to characterize DPTs in time-periodic open quantum systems through the spectrum of the Floquet propagator. We first study driven-dissipative Kerr resonators, known to display a DPT, showing that counter-rotating terms in the drive shift the critical point and significantly change the time scales associated with the transition. We then investigate DPTs in the driven quantum Rabi model and its time-independent approximation, the driven Jaynes-Cummings model, finding that the Rabi model exhibits distinct critical features as the ultrastrong coupling regime is approached. Moreover, our Floquet analysis unveils the disappearance of the DPT in the deep strong coupling regime, due to light-matter decoupling. Our approach sets the stage for the study of dissipative criticality in a broad class of time-dependent open quantum systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Floquet Quasienergy-Resolved Dissipation, Dynamics, and Spectroscopy in Ultrastrong Cavity-QED

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A nonsecular Floquet generalized master equation framework is developed for open ultrastrong cavity-QED, demonstrating that dissipation is governed by quasienergies rather than static dressed resonances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    O. Doré, C. Hirata, Y. Wang, D. Weinberg, T. Eifler, R. J. Foley, C. H. Heinrich, E. Krause, S. Perlmutter, A. Pisani, et al., Wfirst: The essential cosmology space observatory for the coming decade (2019), arXiv:1904.01174 [astro-ph.CO]

  2. [2]

    Akeson, L

    R. Akeson, L. Armus, E. Bachelet, V. Bailey, L. Bartusek, A.Bellini,D.Benford,D.Bennett,A.Bhattacharya,R.Bohlin, et al., The wide field infrared survey telescope: 100 hubbles for the 2020s (2019), arXiv:1902.05569 [astro-ph.IM]

  3. [3]

    Ivezićet al.(LSST), Astrophys

    Ž. Ivezićet al.(LSST), Astrophys. J.873, 111 (2019), arXiv:0805.2366 [astro-ph]

  4. [4]

    validation of the scientific program for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument

    DESI Collaboration, Data for figures and tables in "validation of the scientific program for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument" (2023)

  5. [5]

    Laureijset al.(Euclid), Euclid definition study report (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]

    R. Laureijset al.(Euclid), Euclid definition study report (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument (2026), arXiv:2503.14745 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument (2026), arXiv:2503.14745 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, C

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara, A. Banerjee, A. M. Delgado, D. K. Ramanah, T. Charnock, E. Giusarma, Y. Li, E. Allys,et al., ApJS250, 2 (2020), arXiv:1909.05273 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [9]

    Knabenhans, J

    M. Knabenhans, J. Stadel, D. Potter, J. Dakin, S. Hannestad, T. Tram, S. Marelli, A. Schneider, R. Teyssier, P. Fosalba, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505, 2840–2869 (2021)

  10. [10]

    Higdon, A

    K.Heitmann,D.Bingham,E.Lawrence,S.Bergner,S.Habib, D. Higdon, A. Pope, R. Biswas, H. Finkel, N. Frontiere, and S. Bhattacharya, The Astrophysical Journal820, 108 (2016). 16

  11. [11]

    U.Seljak,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety 318, 203–213 (2000)

  12. [12]

    Ma and J

    C. Ma and J. N. Fry, The Astrophysical Journal543, 503–513 (2000)

  13. [13]

    J. A. Peacock and R. E. Smith, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society318, 1144–1156 (2000)

  14. [15]

    A. J. Mead, S. Brieden, T. Tröster, and C. Heymans, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society502, 1401–1422 (2021)

  15. [16]

    A.SchneiderandR.Teyssier,JCAP12,049,arXiv:1510.06034 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [17]

    A. Mead, S. Brieden, T. Tröster, and C. Heymans, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502, 1401 (2021), arXiv:2009.01858 [astro- ph.CO]

  17. [18]

    Aricò, R

    G. Aricò, R. E. Angulo, S. Contreras, L. Ondaro-Mallea, M. Pellejero-Ibañez, and M. Zennaro, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506, 4070–4082 (2021)

  18. [19]

    Aricò, R

    G. Aricò, R. E. Angulo, M. Zennaro, S. Contreras, A. Chen, andC.Hernández-Monteagudo,Astron.Astrophys.678,A109 (2023), arXiv:2303.05537 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [20]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012(07), 051–051

  20. [21]

    J.J.M.Carrasco,M.P.Hertzberg,andL.Senatore,Journalof High Energy Physics2012, 10.1007/jhep09(2012)082 (2012)

  21. [22]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green, and L. Senatore, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2014(07), 056–056

  22. [23]

    T.Konstandin,R.A.Porto,andH.Rubira,JournalofCosmol- ogy and Astroparticle Physics2019(11), 027–027

  23. [24]

    Zhang, F

    G.d’Amico,J.Gleyzes,N.Kokron,K.Markovic,L.Senatore, P. Zhang, F. Beutler, and H. Gil-Marín, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(05), 005–005

  24. [25]

    G.D’Amico,L.Senatore,andP.Zhang,JournalofCosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021(01), 006–006

  25. [26]

    Zhang and Y

    P. Zhang and Y. Cai, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(01), 031

  26. [27]

    Simon, P

    T. Simon, P. Zhang, and V. Poulin, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2023(07), 041

  27. [28]

    Chudaykin, M

    A. Chudaykin, M. M. Ivanov, and T. Nishimichi, On pri- ors and scale cuts in eft-based full-shape analyses (2025), arXiv:2410.16358 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [30]

    S.Ramirez-Solanoet al.(DESI),Fullmodelingandparameter compressionmethodsinconfigurationspacefordesi2024and beyond (2024), arXiv:2404.07268 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [31]

    S.ForemanandL.Senatore,JCAP04,033,arXiv:1503.01775 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [32]

    D’Amico, A

    G. D’Amico, A. Refregier, L. Senatore, and P. Zhang, The cosmological analysis of des 3×2pt data from the effective field theory of large-scale structure (2025), arXiv:2510.24878 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [33]

    V.Desjacques,D.Jeong,andF.Schmidt,PhysicsReports733, 1–193 (2018)

  32. [34]

    DeRose and S.-F

    J. DeRose and S.-F. Chen, The lensing counter narrative: An effective description of small-scale clustering in weak lensing power spectra (2025), arXiv:2510.18981 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [35]

    Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, JCAP01, 025, arXiv:1910.08085 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [36]

    Chen and N

    S.-F. Chen and N. Kokron, JCAP01, 027, arXiv:2309.16761 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [37]

    Rept.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551

    F.Bernardeau,S.Colombi,E.Gaztanaga,andR.Scoccimarro, Phys. Rept.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551

  36. [38]

    M.GarnyandP.Taule,JournalofCosmologyandAstroparticle Physics2021(01), 020–020

  37. [39]

    M.GarnyandP.Taule,JournalofCosmologyandAstroparticle Physics2022(09), 054

  38. [40]

    Anastasiou, A

    C. Anastasiou, A. Favorito, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, andH.Zheng,Efficientevaluationofthedark-mattertwo-loop power spectrum in the eft of lss (2025), arXiv:2509.05187 [astro-ph.CO]

  39. [41]

    Lewandowski, A

    M. Lewandowski, A. Perko, and L. Senatore, JCAP05, 019, arXiv:1412.5049 [astro-ph.CO]

  40. [42]

    D. P. L. Bragança, M. Lewandowski, D. Sekera, L. Senatore, andR.Sgier,JCAP10,074,arXiv:2010.02929[astro-ph.CO]

  41. [43]

    L.SenatoreandG.Trevisan,JCAP05,019,arXiv:1710.02178 [astro-ph.CO]

  42. [44]

    T. Bakx, H. Rubira, N. E. Chisari, and Z. Vlah 10.33232/001c.157501 (2025), arXiv:2508.00611 [astro- ph.CO]

  43. [45]

    Foreman, H

    S. Foreman, H. Perrier, and L. Senatore, JCAP05, 027, arXiv:1507.05326 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [46]

    T. Bakx, N. E. Chisari, and Z. Vlah, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191002 (2025), arXiv:2407.04660 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [47]

    Farakou and C

    D. Farakou and C. Skordis, Sym-eft: Accelerating effective field theory of large scale structure with symbolic regression (2025), arXiv:2511.05093 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [48]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition (2015), arXiv:1512.03385 [cs.CV]

  47. [49]

    Zhong, E

    K. Zhong, E. Saraivanov, J. Caputi, V. Miranda, S. S. Boruah, T.Eifler,andE.Krause,Attention-basedneuralnetworkemula- torsformulti-probedatavectorsparti: Forecastingthegrowth- geometry split (2024), arXiv:2402.17716 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [50]

    Saraivanov, K

    E. Saraivanov, K. Zhong, V. Miranda, S. S. Boruah, T. Eifler, and E. Krause, Attention-based neural network emulators for multi-probe data vectors part ii: Assessing tension metrics (2024), arXiv:2403.12337 [astro-ph.CO]

  49. [51]

    Y. Zhu, E. Saraivanov, J. A. Kable, A. S. Giannakopoulou, A. Nijjar, V. Miranda, M. Bonici, T. Eifler, and E. Krause, Attention-basedneuralnetworkemulatorsformulti-probedata vectors part iii: Modeling the next generation surveys (2025), arXiv:2505.22574 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [52]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

  51. [53]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP07, 028, arXiv:2411.12022 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [54]

    Baldauf, L

    T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D92, 123007 (2015), arXiv:1507.02256 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [55]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, M. Oliphant, Travis E. andHaber- land, T. Reddy, E. Cournapeau, David andBurovski, P. Peter- son, J. Weckesser, Warren andBright,et al., Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

  54. [56]

    D. N. Limber, ApJ117, 134 (1953)

  55. [57]

    C.Douxet al.(DES),MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronom- ical Society503, 3796–3817 (2021)

  56. [58]

    Krauseet al.(DES), Dark energy survey year 3 re- sults: Multi-probe modeling strategy and validation (2021), arXiv:2105.13548 [astro-ph.CO]

    E. Krauseet al.(DES), Dark energy survey year 3 re- sults: Multi-probe modeling strategy and validation (2021), arXiv:2105.13548 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [59]

    O.Friedrichet al.(DES),MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstro- nomical Society508, 3125–3165 (2021)

  58. [60]

    Dalalet al., Phys

    R. Dalalet al., Phys. Rev. D108, 123519 (2023), arXiv:2304.00701 [astro-ph.CO]. 17

  59. [61]

    A. H. Wrightet al., Astron. Astrophys.703, A158 (2025), arXiv:2503.19441 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [62]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al., Dark energy survey year 6 re- sults: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear (2026), arXiv:2602.10065 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [63]

    I.G.McCarthy,J.Schaye,S.Bird,andA.M.C.LeBrun,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465, 2936 (2017), arXiv:1603.02702 [astro-ph.CO]

  62. [64]

    J. Xu, T. Eifler, E. Krause, V. Miranda, J. Salcido, and I. Mc- Carthy, (2025), arXiv:2510.25596 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [65]

    Stebbins, Weak lensing on the celestial sphere (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9609149 [astro-ph]

    A. Stebbins, Weak lensing on the celestial sphere (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9609149 [astro-ph]

  64. [66]

    Krause and T

    E. Krause and T. Eifler, MNRAS470, 2100 (2017), arXiv:1601.05779 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [67]

    497, 2699 (2020), arXiv:2004.04833 [astro-ph.CO]

    X.Fang, T.Eifler,andE.Krause,Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 497, 2699 (2020), arXiv:2004.04833 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [68]

    I. G. McCarthy, S. Bird, J. Schaye, J. Harnois-Deraps, A. S. Font, and L. van Waerbeke, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society476, 2999–3030 (2018)

  67. [69]

    A. M. C. Le Brun, I. G. McCarthy, J. Schaye, and T. J. Pon- man,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety441, 1270–1290 (2014)

  68. [70]

    C. M. Hirata and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D70, 063526 (2004), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 82, 049901 (2010)], arXiv:astro- ph/0406275

  69. [71]

    Bridle and L

    S. Bridle and L. King, New J. Phys.9, 444 (2007), arXiv:0705.0166 [astro-ph]

  70. [72]

    Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, JCAP05, 061, arXiv:2012.04114 [astro-ph.CO]

  71. [73]

    J. A. Blazek, N. MacCrann, M. Troxel, and X. Fang, Physical Review D100, 10.1103/physrevd.100.103506 (2019)

  72. [74]

    R.Takahashi,M.Sato,T.Nishimichi,A.Taruya,andM.Oguri, Astrophys.J.761,152(2012),arXiv:1208.2701[astro-ph.CO]

  73. [75]

    A.Barreira,G.Cabass,F.Schmidt,A.Pillepich,andD.Nelson, JCAP12, 013, arXiv:2006.09368 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [76]

    M. M. Ivanov, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, S. Mishra-Sharma, A. Ob- uljen, and M. W. Toomey, Phys. Rev. D110, 063538 (2024), arXiv:2402.13310 [astro-ph.CO]

  75. [77]

    M. M. Ivanov, A. Obuljen, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, and M. W. Toomey, Phys. Rev. D111, 063548 (2025), arXiv:2409.10609 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [78]

    Akitsu, Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the hod-informed prior (2024), arXiv:2410.08998 [astro-ph.CO]

    K. Akitsu, Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the hod-informed prior (2024), arXiv:2410.08998 [astro-ph.CO]

  77. [79]

    Shiferaw, N

    M. Shiferaw, N. Kokron, and R. H. Wechsler, Astrophys. J. 989, 218 (2025), arXiv:2412.06886 [astro-ph.CO]

  78. [80]

    M. M. Ivanov, Simulation-based priors without simulations: an analytic perspective on eft parameters of galaxies (2025), arXiv:2503.07270 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [81]

    Salcido, I

    J. Salcido, I. G. McCarthy, J. Kwan, A. Upadhye, and A. S. Font,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety523, 2247–2262 (2023)

  80. [82]

    Genel, M

    S. Genel, M. Vogelsberger, V. Springel, D. Sijacki, D. Nel- son, G. Snyder, V. Rodriguez-Gomez, P. Torrey, and L. Hern- quist,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety445, 175–200 (2014)

Showing first 80 references.