REVIEW 3 major objections 1 cited by
Dissipative phase transitions in driven open quantum systems are diagnosed by the Floquet propagator spectrum, not the static Liouvillian.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · grok-4.5
2026-07-14 21:54 UTC pith:LPN7XE5L
load-bearing objection We only have the abstract; the supplied full text is an unrelated cosmology paper, so the Floquet-propagator DPT claims cannot be audited. the 3 major comments →
Floquet Dissipative Phase Transitions
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Dissipative phase transitions in time-periodic open quantum systems that cannot be exactly recast as time-independent problems are characterized through the spectrum of the Floquet propagator; this spectrum plays the role that the Liouvillian spectrum plays in the static case, revealing drive-induced shifts of criticality in Kerr resonators and the disappearance of a DPT in the deep strong-coupling Rabi model due to light-matter decoupling.
What carries the argument
The Floquet propagator (the stroboscopic one-period evolution superoperator of the open system) and its spectrum; gap closing or critical slowing of its eigenvalues is used as the diagnostic of dissipative criticality when no time-independent Liouvillian exists.
Load-bearing premise
That the spectrum of the Floquet propagator is a faithful and general diagnostic of dissipative criticality for open Floquet systems, analogous to the Liouvillian spectrum in the static case, without needing an exact mapping to a time-independent problem.
What would settle it
In a driven-dissipative Kerr resonator or Rabi model whose parameters can be tuned through the claimed critical point, measure whether the slowest relaxation time of the open system diverges (or the Floquet-propagator gap closes) exactly where the theory predicts, and whether that divergence disappears in the deep strong-coupling regime as light-matter decoupling sets in.
If this is right
- Counter-rotating drive terms must be retained when locating critical points and relaxation timescales of driven Kerr resonators; rotating-wave approximations shift both.
- The driven quantum Rabi model develops distinct critical signatures once the ultrastrong-coupling regime is entered, unlike its Jaynes-Cummings approximation.
- In the deep strong-coupling regime the dissipative phase transition of the Rabi model vanishes because light and matter decouple.
- A broad class of time-dependent open quantum systems that previously lacked a Liouvillian description can now be analyzed for dissipative criticality.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same Floquet-propagator diagnostic should apply without change to multi-mode or lattice open Floquet systems, provided the one-period map can be computed or approximated.
- Experimental platforms already used for static dissipative phase transitions (circuit QED, polariton condensates) can be re-driven periodically to test the predicted shift and disappearance of critical points.
- Once the Floquet gap is established as the order parameter, finite-size scaling of that gap becomes the natural route to extract critical exponents of open Floquet systems.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The abstract proposes a general framework for dissipative phase transitions (DPTs) in time-periodic open quantum systems that cannot be recast as time-independent Liouvillian problems, diagnosing criticality from the spectrum of the Floquet propagator rather than a static Liouvillian. It claims this framework reveals (i) drive-induced shifts of the critical point and associated timescales in driven-dissipative Kerr resonators once counter-rotating terms are retained, and (ii) distinct ultrastrong-coupling critical features in the driven quantum Rabi model relative to its Jaynes–Cummings approximation, culminating in the disappearance of the DPT in the deep strong-coupling regime due to light–matter decoupling. The supplied full-text block, however, is an unrelated cosmology manuscript on two-loop EFTofLSS for Roman cosmic shear (arXiv:2603.13031), so none of the Floquet definitions, spectra, or numerical claims can be audited from the materials provided.
Significance. If the Floquet-propagator diagnostic is well-defined, unique, and shown to recover known static DPTs in appropriate limits while correctly capturing genuinely time-periodic criticality, the work would fill a clear methodological gap and open a broad class of driven open systems to dissipative criticality studies. The reported Kerr critical-point shift and the Rabi deep-strong-coupling disappearance would then be concrete, falsifiable predictions of physical interest. Those strengths cannot be credited from the present package because the load-bearing spectral definitions, gap-closing criteria, and comparisons are not present in the supplied full text.
major comments (3)
- Manuscript mismatch: the abstract and paper_id (2603.13030, Floquet DPTs) do not match the full manuscript text, which is an EFTofLSS cosmology paper on Roman weak lensing. No Floquet propagator, Liouvillian comparison, Kerr or Rabi spectra, or critical-point numerics appear in the provided full text. A technical review of the claimed framework is therefore impossible from the materials given.
- Abstract-level central claim: the spectrum of the one-period Floquet propagator is asserted as a general, faithful diagnostic of dissipative criticality (gap closing / critical slowing) for open Floquet systems without an exact static mapping. Without the methods section, spectral criterion, uniqueness argument, and recovery of known static DPTs, this premise remains definitional rather than demonstrated and underpins every reported result (Kerr shift; Rabi ultrastrong features; DPT disappearance).
- Unauditable results: claims that counter-rotating drive terms shift the Kerr critical point and change transition timescales, and that the Rabi DPT disappears in deep strong coupling via light–matter decoupling, cannot be checked for truncation artifacts, stroboscopic sampling dependence, or consistency with any Liouvillian limit. These are load-bearing for the paper’s scientific content and require the correct full manuscript.
Circularity Check
No auditable Floquet derivation chain; cached full text is an unrelated EFTofLSS cosmology paper, so circularity cannot be established beyond a non-tautological abstract definition.
full rationale
The claimed paper (arXiv:2603.13030, Floquet Dissipative Phase Transitions) is represented only by its abstract. The CACHEABLE full manuscript is a completely different work (two-loop EFTofLSS for Roman cosmic shear). From the Floquet abstract alone, the central move is definitional framework-building: DPTs in time-periodic open systems are characterized by the spectrum of the Floquet propagator, by analogy with the static Liouvillian spectrum. That is a proposed diagnostic, not a prediction forced by fitting the same quantity it claims to predict, nor a uniqueness theorem imported from overlapping authors. Applications (Kerr critical-point shift from counter-rotating terms; Rabi vs Jaynes–Cummings ultrastrong features; DPT disappearance via light-matter decoupling) are stated as results of that analysis, but without Floquet-propagator definitions, gap-closing criteria, stroboscopic sampling details, or comparison to Liouvillian limits, no reduction of the form 'Eq. X = input by construction' can be exhibited. Per the hard rules, absence of an inspectable derivation chain is not grounds to invent circularity; residual risk that criticality is identified with the same spectral feature used to define it remains an unauditable correctness concern, not a demonstrated circular step. Score 1 reflects only that the abstract's framework is definitional by nature, not that a circular derivation was found.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (3)
- domain assumption Open quantum dynamics of the systems considered are generated by a time-periodic Lindblad/Liouvillian master equation.
- ad hoc to paper Dissipative criticality can be diagnosed from spectral properties (gaps, slow modes) of the one-period Floquet propagator, generalizing the static Liouvillian spectrum.
- domain assumption Counter-rotating terms and ultrastrong/deep-strong light-matter coupling are physically relevant and not always removable by rotating-wave approximations.
read the original abstract
Dissipative phase transitions (DPTs) are traditionally characterized through the spectrum of a time-independent Liouvillian superoperator. However, this definition does not apply to time-periodic (Floquet) systems that cannot be exactly recast as time-independent problems. Here, we develop a general framework to characterize DPTs in time-periodic open quantum systems through the spectrum of the Floquet propagator. We first study driven-dissipative Kerr resonators, known to display a DPT, showing that counter-rotating terms in the drive shift the critical point and significantly change the time scales associated with the transition. We then investigate DPTs in the driven quantum Rabi model and its time-independent approximation, the driven Jaynes-Cummings model, finding that the Rabi model exhibits distinct critical features as the ultrastrong coupling regime is approached. Moreover, our Floquet analysis unveils the disappearance of the DPT in the deep strong coupling regime, due to light-matter decoupling. Our approach sets the stage for the study of dissipative criticality in a broad class of time-dependent open quantum systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Floquet Quasienergy-Resolved Dissipation, Dynamics, and Spectroscopy in Ultrastrong Cavity-QED
A nonsecular Floquet generalized master equation framework is developed for open ultrastrong cavity-QED, demonstrating that dissipation is governed by quasienergies rather than static dressed resonances.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
O. Doré, C. Hirata, Y. Wang, D. Weinberg, T. Eifler, R. J. Foley, C. H. Heinrich, E. Krause, S. Perlmutter, A. Pisani, et al., Wfirst: The essential cosmology space observatory for the coming decade (2019), arXiv:1904.01174 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[2]
R. Akeson, L. Armus, E. Bachelet, V. Bailey, L. Bartusek, A.Bellini,D.Benford,D.Bennett,A.Bhattacharya,R.Bohlin, et al., The wide field infrared survey telescope: 100 hubbles for the 2020s (2019), arXiv:1902.05569 [astro-ph.IM]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[3]
Ž. Ivezićet al.(LSST), Astrophys. J.873, 111 (2019), arXiv:0805.2366 [astro-ph]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[4]
validation of the scientific program for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument
DESI Collaboration, Data for figures and tables in "validation of the scientific program for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument" (2023)
2023
-
[5]
Laureijset al.(Euclid), Euclid definition study report (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]
R. Laureijset al.(Euclid), Euclid definition study report (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[6]
M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument (2026), arXiv:2503.14745 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[7]
M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[8]
F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara, A. Banerjee, A. M. Delgado, D. K. Ramanah, T. Charnock, E. Giusarma, Y. Li, E. Allys,et al., ApJS250, 2 (2020), arXiv:1909.05273 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[9]
Knabenhans, J
M. Knabenhans, J. Stadel, D. Potter, J. Dakin, S. Hannestad, T. Tram, S. Marelli, A. Schneider, R. Teyssier, P. Fosalba, et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505, 2840–2869 (2021)
2021
-
[10]
Higdon, A
K.Heitmann,D.Bingham,E.Lawrence,S.Bergner,S.Habib, D. Higdon, A. Pope, R. Biswas, H. Finkel, N. Frontiere, and S. Bhattacharya, The Astrophysical Journal820, 108 (2016). 16
2016
-
[11]
U.Seljak,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety 318, 203–213 (2000)
2000
-
[12]
Ma and J
C. Ma and J. N. Fry, The Astrophysical Journal543, 503–513 (2000)
2000
-
[13]
J. A. Peacock and R. E. Smith, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society318, 1144–1156 (2000)
2000
-
[15]
A. J. Mead, S. Brieden, T. Tröster, and C. Heymans, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society502, 1401–1422 (2021)
2021
-
[16]
A.SchneiderandR.Teyssier,JCAP12,049,arXiv:1510.06034 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[17]
A. Mead, S. Brieden, T. Tröster, and C. Heymans, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502, 1401 (2021), arXiv:2009.01858 [astro- ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[18]
Aricò, R
G. Aricò, R. E. Angulo, S. Contreras, L. Ondaro-Mallea, M. Pellejero-Ibañez, and M. Zennaro, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506, 4070–4082 (2021)
2021
-
[19]
G. Aricò, R. E. Angulo, M. Zennaro, S. Contreras, A. Chen, andC.Hernández-Monteagudo,Astron.Astrophys.678,A109 (2023), arXiv:2303.05537 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[20]
Baumann, A
D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012(07), 051–051
-
[21]
J.J.M.Carrasco,M.P.Hertzberg,andL.Senatore,Journalof High Energy Physics2012, 10.1007/jhep09(2012)082 (2012)
-
[22]
J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green, and L. Senatore, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2014(07), 056–056
-
[23]
T.Konstandin,R.A.Porto,andH.Rubira,JournalofCosmol- ogy and Astroparticle Physics2019(11), 027–027
-
[24]
Zhang, F
G.d’Amico,J.Gleyzes,N.Kokron,K.Markovic,L.Senatore, P. Zhang, F. Beutler, and H. Gil-Marín, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(05), 005–005
-
[25]
G.D’Amico,L.Senatore,andP.Zhang,JournalofCosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021(01), 006–006
-
[26]
Zhang and Y
P. Zhang and Y. Cai, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(01), 031
-
[27]
Simon, P
T. Simon, P. Zhang, and V. Poulin, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2023(07), 041
-
[28]
A. Chudaykin, M. M. Ivanov, and T. Nishimichi, On pri- ors and scale cuts in eft-based full-shape analyses (2025), arXiv:2410.16358 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[30]
S.Ramirez-Solanoet al.(DESI),Fullmodelingandparameter compressionmethodsinconfigurationspacefordesi2024and beyond (2024), arXiv:2404.07268 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[31]
S.ForemanandL.Senatore,JCAP04,033,arXiv:1503.01775 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[32]
G. D’Amico, A. Refregier, L. Senatore, and P. Zhang, The cosmological analysis of des 3×2pt data from the effective field theory of large-scale structure (2025), arXiv:2510.24878 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[33]
V.Desjacques,D.Jeong,andF.Schmidt,PhysicsReports733, 1–193 (2018)
2018
-
[34]
J. DeRose and S.-F. Chen, The lensing counter narrative: An effective description of small-scale clustering in weak lensing power spectra (2025), arXiv:2510.18981 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[35]
Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, JCAP01, 025, arXiv:1910.08085 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910
- [36]
-
[37]
Rept.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551
F.Bernardeau,S.Colombi,E.Gaztanaga,andR.Scoccimarro, Phys. Rept.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[38]
M.GarnyandP.Taule,JournalofCosmologyandAstroparticle Physics2021(01), 020–020
-
[39]
M.GarnyandP.Taule,JournalofCosmologyandAstroparticle Physics2022(09), 054
-
[40]
C. Anastasiou, A. Favorito, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, andH.Zheng,Efficientevaluationofthedark-mattertwo-loop power spectrum in the eft of lss (2025), arXiv:2509.05187 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[41]
M. Lewandowski, A. Perko, and L. Senatore, JCAP05, 019, arXiv:1412.5049 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[42]
D. P. L. Bragança, M. Lewandowski, D. Sekera, L. Senatore, andR.Sgier,JCAP10,074,arXiv:2010.02929[astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[43]
L.SenatoreandG.Trevisan,JCAP05,019,arXiv:1710.02178 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[44]
T. Bakx, H. Rubira, N. E. Chisari, and Z. Vlah 10.33232/001c.157501 (2025), arXiv:2508.00611 [astro- ph.CO]
-
[45]
S. Foreman, H. Perrier, and L. Senatore, JCAP05, 027, arXiv:1507.05326 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[46]
T. Bakx, N. E. Chisari, and Z. Vlah, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191002 (2025), arXiv:2407.04660 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[47]
D. Farakou and C. Skordis, Sym-eft: Accelerating effective field theory of large scale structure with symbolic regression (2025), arXiv:2511.05093 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[48]
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition (2015), arXiv:1512.03385 [cs.CV]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[49]
K. Zhong, E. Saraivanov, J. Caputi, V. Miranda, S. S. Boruah, T.Eifler,andE.Krause,Attention-basedneuralnetworkemula- torsformulti-probedatavectorsparti: Forecastingthegrowth- geometry split (2024), arXiv:2402.17716 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[50]
E. Saraivanov, K. Zhong, V. Miranda, S. S. Boruah, T. Eifler, and E. Krause, Attention-based neural network emulators for multi-probe data vectors part ii: Assessing tension metrics (2024), arXiv:2403.12337 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[51]
Y. Zhu, E. Saraivanov, J. A. Kable, A. S. Giannakopoulou, A. Nijjar, V. Miranda, M. Bonici, T. Eifler, and E. Krause, Attention-basedneuralnetworkemulatorsformulti-probedata vectors part iii: Modeling the next generation surveys (2025), arXiv:2505.22574 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[52]
N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[53]
A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP07, 028, arXiv:2411.12022 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[54]
T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D92, 123007 (2015), arXiv:1507.02256 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[55]
Virtanen, R
P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, M. Oliphant, Travis E. andHaber- land, T. Reddy, E. Cournapeau, David andBurovski, P. Peter- son, J. Weckesser, Warren andBright,et al., Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)
2020
-
[56]
D. N. Limber, ApJ117, 134 (1953)
1953
-
[57]
C.Douxet al.(DES),MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronom- ical Society503, 3796–3817 (2021)
2021
-
[58]
E. Krauseet al.(DES), Dark energy survey year 3 re- sults: Multi-probe modeling strategy and validation (2021), arXiv:2105.13548 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[59]
O.Friedrichet al.(DES),MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstro- nomical Society508, 3125–3165 (2021)
2021
-
[60]
R. Dalalet al., Phys. Rev. D108, 123519 (2023), arXiv:2304.00701 [astro-ph.CO]. 17
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
-
[61]
A. H. Wrightet al., Astron. Astrophys.703, A158 (2025), arXiv:2503.19441 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[62]
T. M. C. Abbottet al., Dark energy survey year 6 re- sults: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear (2026), arXiv:2602.10065 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2026
-
[63]
I.G.McCarthy,J.Schaye,S.Bird,andA.M.C.LeBrun,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465, 2936 (2017), arXiv:1603.02702 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[64]
J. Xu, T. Eifler, E. Krause, V. Miranda, J. Salcido, and I. Mc- Carthy, (2025), arXiv:2510.25596 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[65]
Stebbins, Weak lensing on the celestial sphere (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9609149 [astro-ph]
A. Stebbins, Weak lensing on the celestial sphere (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9609149 [astro-ph]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
-
[66]
E. Krause and T. Eifler, MNRAS470, 2100 (2017), arXiv:1601.05779 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[67]
497, 2699 (2020), arXiv:2004.04833 [astro-ph.CO]
X.Fang, T.Eifler,andE.Krause,Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 497, 2699 (2020), arXiv:2004.04833 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[68]
I. G. McCarthy, S. Bird, J. Schaye, J. Harnois-Deraps, A. S. Font, and L. van Waerbeke, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society476, 2999–3030 (2018)
2018
-
[69]
A. M. C. Le Brun, I. G. McCarthy, J. Schaye, and T. J. Pon- man,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety441, 1270–1290 (2014)
2014
-
[70]
C. M. Hirata and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D70, 063526 (2004), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 82, 049901 (2010)], arXiv:astro- ph/0406275
arXiv 2004
-
[71]
S. Bridle and L. King, New J. Phys.9, 444 (2007), arXiv:0705.0166 [astro-ph]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[72]
Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari, and F. Schmidt, JCAP05, 061, arXiv:2012.04114 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[73]
J. A. Blazek, N. MacCrann, M. Troxel, and X. Fang, Physical Review D100, 10.1103/physrevd.100.103506 (2019)
-
[74]
R.Takahashi,M.Sato,T.Nishimichi,A.Taruya,andM.Oguri, Astrophys.J.761,152(2012),arXiv:1208.2701[astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[75]
A.Barreira,G.Cabass,F.Schmidt,A.Pillepich,andD.Nelson, JCAP12, 013, arXiv:2006.09368 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[76]
M. M. Ivanov, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, S. Mishra-Sharma, A. Ob- uljen, and M. W. Toomey, Phys. Rev. D110, 063538 (2024), arXiv:2402.13310 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[77]
M. M. Ivanov, A. Obuljen, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, and M. W. Toomey, Phys. Rev. D111, 063548 (2025), arXiv:2409.10609 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[78]
K. Akitsu, Mapping the galaxy-halo connection to the galaxy bias: implication to the hod-informed prior (2024), arXiv:2410.08998 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
-
[79]
M. Shiferaw, N. Kokron, and R. H. Wechsler, Astrophys. J. 989, 218 (2025), arXiv:2412.06886 [astro-ph.CO]
arXiv 2025
-
[80]
M. M. Ivanov, Simulation-based priors without simulations: an analytic perspective on eft parameters of galaxies (2025), arXiv:2503.07270 [astro-ph.CO]
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[81]
Salcido, I
J. Salcido, I. G. McCarthy, J. Kwan, A. Upadhye, and A. S. Font,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety523, 2247–2262 (2023)
2023
-
[82]
Genel, M
S. Genel, M. Vogelsberger, V. Springel, D. Sijacki, D. Nel- son, G. Snyder, V. Rodriguez-Gomez, P. Torrey, and L. Hern- quist,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety445, 175–200 (2014)
2014
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.