Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

In Palatini gravity the Gauss–Bonnet–inflaton coupling corrects the kinetic term with the same form as Chern–Simons but opposite sign, and likewise for gravitational waves.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 22:58 UTC pith:KNG4HD5T

load-bearing objection Clean Palatini extension of Gauss–Bonnet inflation: exact FLRW kinetic correction with opposite sign to Chern–Simons, plus controlled GW actions under gradient + order reduction.

arxiv 2603.17742 v2 pith:KNG4HD5T submitted 2026-03-18 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet term in the Palatini formulation

Ali Hassan , Syksy Rasanen This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords Palatini gravityGauss-Bonnetinflationinflaton kinetic termgravitational wavesnon-metricitytorsionChern-Simons comparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a scalar inflaton directly coupled to the Gauss–Bonnet term when the metric and connection are independent. The connection is solved exactly on a flat expanding universe and, for general spacetimes, under a gradient expansion with order reduction. Three cases are treated: unconstrained connection, vanishing non-metricity, and vanishing torsion. In every case the leading correction to the inflaton kinetic term has the same functional form that appears for the Chern–Simons term, but with a negative sign, so the kinetic term can become negative if the coupling is large enough. The gravitational-wave sector receives an analogous higher-derivative correction that tends to destabilise both polarisations (or may change sign when torsion is set to zero). Inside the regime of validity of the approximations these Palatini effects remain small unless the kinetic term is near or past a sign flip.

Core claim

After the independent connection is solved and substituted back into the action, the leading-order Palatini correction to the inflaton kinetic function is K̃ = K − (32/3) E′² V² in all three connection cases. This is identical in structure to the Chern–Simons Palatini correction but carries the opposite sign. The same substitution produces gravitational-wave corrections of Chern–Simons form with a negative prefactor, except in the torsion-free case where a field-dependent factor f₁ can change sign. Differences from the ordinary metric formulation therefore stay small within the gradient approximation unless the kinetic term approaches or crosses zero.

What carries the argument

Exact solution of the first-order distortion equation on flat FLRW, followed by iterative solution under the gradient expansion and order reduction (replacing Ricci tensors by V g_αβ from the lowest-order metric equation) for a general spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

The gradient expansion plus order reduction is assumed to keep higher-derivative terms and any extra connection degrees of freedom under control inside the claimed regime of validity.

What would settle it

A Hamiltonian analysis or numerical evolution of linear perturbations outside the gradient regime that exhibits either healthy extra modes or runaway growth would show that the effective second-order description is incomplete.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The kinetic term can flip sign for |E′|V ≳ 0.3 (when K = 1), opening the possibility of novel preheating dynamics.
  • Gravitational-wave propagation acquires higher-derivative corrections of Chern–Simons form but with opposite (or possibly sign-changing) prefactor.
  • On pure FLRW the Gauss–Bonnet term becomes a total derivative after the connection is solved, so no new degrees of freedom appear in the background.
  • Slow-roll inflation remains essentially indistinguishable from the metric formulation provided the kinetic term stays positive and not near zero.
  • Extra degrees of freedom associated with the differential connection equation remain to be classified for stability beyond the gradient regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A complete Hamiltonian count that includes the Einstein–Hilbert term and the scalar coupling could reveal whether any of the nine unconstrained Gauss–Bonnet degrees of freedom become ghosts once the scalar is present.
  • Regions where the kinetic term flips sign may imprint distinctive features on the primordial spectrum or on preheating gravitational waves that would observationally separate Palatini from metric Gauss–Bonnet inflation.
  • The opposite sign relative to Chern–Simons suggests that simultaneous couplings to both topological densities could cancel the leading kinetic correction while leaving higher-order or parity-violating effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a scalar inflaton non-minimally coupled to the Gauss–Bonnet term in the Palatini (metric-affine) formulation. The connection is solved exactly on a spatially flat FLRW background for three cases (unconstrained, vanishing non-metricity, vanishing torsion) and is shown to be identical; after substitution into the action the leading correction to the inflaton kinetic term is K̃ = K − (32/3) E′² V². For a general spacetime the same leading kinetic correction, together with a Weyl-squared correction to the gravitational-wave sector, is recovered by a gradient expansion plus order reduction. The GW modification has the same structural form as the authors’ earlier Chern–Simons result but with opposite sign (except possibly for zero torsion, where a field-dependent prefactor f₁ can change sign). Within the stated regime of validity the Palatini corrections remain small unless the kinetic term is near or past a sign flip.

Significance. The work supplies a controlled, self-contained comparison between the Palatini Gauss–Bonnet and Chern–Simons couplings during inflation. The exact FLRW solution (eqs. 3.9–3.14) and the subsequent gradient-expansion results (eqs. 3.19, 3.30, 3.32) establish that the leading kinetic correction is universal across the three connection choices and opposite in sign to the Chern–Simons case, while the GW sector is destabilising rather than stabilising. These analytic results are parameter-free once the background Friedmann equation is used and therefore constitute a clean theoretical benchmark for future studies of preheating or of the extra degrees of freedom that may appear away from FLRW.

minor comments (4)
  1. In §3.1.1 the statement that “there are no physical solutions for 16 H Ė < −1” is left without a brief physical interpretation; a sentence on the domain of the square root would help the reader.
  2. Equation (3.14) and the subsequent discussion of the sign of K̃ would be clearer if the authors explicitly noted that the full (non-perturbative) kinetic term in (3.12) remains bounded from below for H Ė > 0.
  3. The lengthy intermediate expression for H_αβγδ (eq. 3.29) is never used after order reduction; it could be moved to an appendix or omitted without loss of clarity.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “Lemaˆ ıtre”, “R¨ as¨ anen”, missing spaces around some equation numbers); a light copy-edit would remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: algebraic derivation of kinetic and GW corrections from the given action is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper starts from the action (2.10) with an independent connection, solves the distortion equation of motion exactly on flat FLRW (eqs. 3.3–3.9) and to leading order in the gradient expansion for a general metric (eqs. 3.15, 3.25–3.27), substitutes back, and obtains the modified kinetic coefficient (3.14) and the tensor actions (3.23, 3.32). These steps are ordinary algebraic manipulations of the given Lagrangian; no free parameter is fitted to data, no target observable is redefined into an input, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work to force the result. Self-citations to the Chern–Simons companion paper [77] and to Holst/Nieh–Yan analyses [64,65] serve only as structural comparison templates; the numerical prefactors that appear for Gauss–Bonnet (–32/3 for the kinetic term, +32 or +24 f1 for the Weyl-squared terms) are recomputed from the Gauss–Bonnet variation and are not taken from those references. The gradient approximation plus order reduction is an explicit modelling choice whose regime of validity is stated, not a circular redefinition of the claim. Consequently the central results do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

Pure effective-field-theory calculation. No parameters are fitted to observational data. The load-bearing ingredients are the chosen action, standard Palatini geometry, the gradient/order-reduction scheme, and the three a-priori connection constraints. No new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The theory is defined by the action S = ∫ √−g [½ R − ½ K(φ) X − V(φ) − E(φ) G] with independent metric and connection (Palatini).
    Starting point of the entire analysis (§2.2.1); all subsequent equations follow from varying this action.
  • domain assumption Gradient approximation: ∂_α φ (hence ∂_α E) is a small expansion parameter suitable for slow-roll super-Hubble modes.
    Controls the iterative solution of the connection and the truncation of the effective action (§3.2.1).
  • domain assumption Order reduction: Ricci tensors appearing in higher-derivative terms may be replaced by V g_αβ from the lowest-order metric equation.
    Used to eliminate spurious higher derivatives after the connection is integrated out (§3.2.1, following standard EFT practice).
  • standard math Spatially flat FLRW symmetry plus parity invariance fix the allowed non-metricity and torsion tensors to the forms given in (3.2).
    Standard cosmological symmetry reduction used for the exact background solution (§3.1.1).
  • standard math Projective invariance of the action allows removal of pure-trace pieces of the connection.
    Used repeatedly to simplify the distortion solution and to argue that certain non-metricity is pure gauge (§2.1.2, §3.1).
  • ad hoc to paper When non-metricity or torsion is set to zero a priori, the connection equation is obtained by the corresponding (anti)symmetrisation of the unconstrained equation.
    Defines the three cases compared throughout the paper; not forced by the action alone.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 24056 in / 3160 out tokens · 32367 ms · 2026-07-13T22:58:29.103000+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the Gauss-Bonnet term coupled to the inflaton in the Palatini formulation of gravity. Unlike in the metric formulation, the Gauss-Bonnet term is not always a total derivative. We solve for the connection and insert it into the action, exactly for the spatially flat FLRW spacetime, and using the gradient approximation and order reduction for a general spacetime. We consider three cases: when the connection is unconstrained, and when non-metricity or torsion is put to zero. In all cases, the leading order change to the inflaton kinetic has the same form as that generated by the Chern-Simons term, but a negative sign. The modification of the gravitational wave sector also has the same form as in the Chern-Simons case but with a negative sign, except possibly for zero torsion, depending on the coupling and the potential. Within the range of validity of our approximations, differences from the metric formulation are small unless the kinetic term flips sign or is close to doing so.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Inflation with nondynamic distortion to leading order in slow roll

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Nondynamic distortion integrated out of a 13-parameter metric-affine action sources the entire inflaton kinetic term; monomial models depend only on exponent ratio while α-attractors recover modified Starobinsky observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685

    1979

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

    1980

  3. [3]

    Kazanas,Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Astrophys

    D. Kazanas,Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Astrophys. J. Lett.241(1980) L59–L63

    1980

  4. [4]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347–356

    1981

  5. [5]

    Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon

    K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195(1981) 467–479

    1981

  6. [6]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33(1981) 532–535

    1981

  7. [7]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389–393. – 14 –

    1982

  8. [8]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220–1223

    1982

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss,Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe, Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 35–38

    1982

  10. [10]

    G. V. Chibisov and V. F. Mukhanov,Galaxy formation and phonons,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.200(1982) 535–550

    1982

  11. [11]

    S. W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

    1982

  12. [12]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110–1113

    1982

  13. [13]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175–178

    1982

  14. [14]

    Sasaki,Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Prog

    M. Sasaki,Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Prog. Theor. Phys.76(1986) 1036

    1986

  15. [15]

    V. F. Mukhanov,Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,Sov. Phys. JETP67(1988) 1297–1302. [16]Planckcollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [1807.06211]. [17]BICEP, Keckcollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves us...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  16. [16]

    McDonough and E

    E. McDonough and E. G. M. Ferreira,The spectrum ofn s constraints from DESI and CMB data,2512.05108

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Weinberg,Effective Field Theory for Inflation,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Effective Field Theory for Inflation,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123541, [0804.4291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    A. R. Solomon and M. Trodden,Higher-derivative operators and effective field theory for general scalar-tensor theories,JCAP02(2018) 031, [1709.09695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    C. G. Callan, S. Coleman and R. Jackiw,A new improved energy-momentum tensor,Annals of Physics59(1970) 42 – 73

    1970

  20. [20]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703–706, [0710.3755]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Bauer and D

    F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric versus Palatini Formulations,Phys. Lett. B665(2008) 222–226, [0803.2664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Capozziello and G

    S. Capozziello and G. Lambiase,Nonminimal derivative coupling and the recovering of cosmological constant,Gen. Rel. Grav.31(1999) 1005–1014, [gr-qc/9901051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    Capozziello, G

    S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase and H. J. Schmidt,Nonminimal derivative couplings and inflation in generalized theories of gravity,Annalen Phys.9(2000) 39–48, [gr-qc/9906051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    S. F. Daniel and R. R. Caldwell,Consequences of a cosmic scalar with kinetic coupling to curvature,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 5573–5580, [0709.0009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    S. V. Sushkov,Exact cosmological solutions with nonminimal derivative coupling,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 103505, [0910.0980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Germani and A

    C. Germani and A. Kehagias,New Model of Inflation with Non-minimal Derivative Coupling of Standard Model Higgs Boson to Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 011302, [1003.2635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Germani and A

    C. Germani and A. Kehagias,Cosmological Perturbations in the New Higgs Inflation,JCAP 05(2010) 019, [1003.4285]. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 231302, [1008.0603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Higgs G-inflation,Phys. Rev. D 83(2011) 083515, [1012.4238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations,Prog. Theor. Phys.126(2011) 511–529, [1105.5723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Germani,Slow Roll Inflation: A Somehow Different Perspective,Rom

    C. Germani,Slow Roll Inflation: A Somehow Different Perspective,Rom. J. Phys.57(2012) 841–848, [1112.1083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Tsujikawa,Observational tests of inflation with a field derivative coupling to gravity,Phys

    S. Tsujikawa,Observational tests of inflation with a field derivative coupling to gravity,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 083518, [1201.5926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, T. Takahashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Generalized Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 023504, [1203.4059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, T. Kunimitsu, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Graceful exit from HiggsGinflation,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 123518, [1309.7410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Germani, Y

    C. Germani, Y. Watanabe and N. Wintergerst,Self-unitarization of New Higgs Inflation and compatibility with Planck and BICEP2 data,JCAP12(2014) 009, [1403.5766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    N. Yang, Q. Fei, Q. Gao and Y. Gong,Inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 205001, [1504.05839]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Kunimitsu, T

    T. Kunimitsu, T. Suyama, Y. Watanabe and J. Yokoyama,Large tensor mode, field range bound and consistency in generalized G-inflation,JCAP08(2015) 044, [1504.06946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Di Vita and C

    S. Di Vita and C. Germani,Electroweak vacuum stability and inflation via nonminimal derivative couplings to gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 045005, [1508.04777]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Escriv` a and C

    A. Escriv` a and C. Germani,Beyond dimensional analysis: Higgs and new Higgs inflations do not violate unitarity,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123526, [1612.06253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Mooij and M. Postma,Unitarity and predictiveness in new Higgs inflation, JHEP03(2018) 038, [1711.08761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Sato and K.-i

    S. Sato and K.-i. Maeda,Hybrid Higgs Inflation: The Use of Disformal Transformation,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 083512, [1712.04237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    C. Fu, P. Wu and H. Yu,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063532, [1907.05042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez,Higgs Inflation with linear and quadratic curvature corrections,1910.11289

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  44. [44]

    L. N. Granda, D. F. Jimenez and W. Cardona,Higgs inflation with non-minimal derivative coupling to gravity,Astropart. Phys.121(2020) 102459, [1911.02901]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Sato and K.-i

    S. Sato and K.-i. Maeda,Stability of hybrid Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103520, [2001.00154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Fumagalli, M

    J. Fumagalli, M. Postma and M. Van Den Bout,Matching and running sensitivity in non-renormalizable inflationary models,JHEP09(2020) 114, [2005.05905]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Lykkas and T. D. Pappas,Palatini-Higgs inflation with nonminimal derivative coupling,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063522, [2008.06371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Dioguardi and A

    C. Dioguardi and A. Racioppi,Palatini F(R,X): A new framework for inflationary attractors, Phys. Dark Univ.45(2024) 101509, [2307.02963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    H. B. Nezhad and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Scalar fields with derivative coupling to curvature in the Palatini and the metric formulation,JCAP02(2024) 009, [2307.04618]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Bouzari Nezhad,Degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories in metric-affine gravity, 2512.08972

    H. Bouzari Nezhad,Degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories in metric-affine gravity, 2512.08972

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Lue, L.-M

    A. Lue, L.-M. Wang and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological signature of new parity violating interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 1506–1509, [astro-ph/9812088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi,Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 104012, [gr-qc/0308071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  53. [53]

    Alexander and N

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480 (2009) 1–55, [0907.2562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Lanczos,A Remarkable property of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39(1938) 842–850

    C. Lanczos,A Remarkable property of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39(1938) 842–850

    1938

  55. [55]

    Lovelock,Divergence-free tensorial concomitants,Aequat

    D. Lovelock,Divergence-free tensorial concomitants,Aequat. Math.4(1970) 127–138

    1970

  56. [56]

    Lovelock,The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,J

    D. Lovelock,The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 498–501

    1971

  57. [57]

    Lovelock,The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,J

    D. Lovelock,The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,J. Math. Phys.13 (1972) 874–876

    1972

  58. [58]

    Delsate, D

    T. Delsate, D. Hilditch and H. Witek,Initial value formulation of dynamical Chern-Simons gravity,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 024027, [1407.6727]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Crisostomi, K

    M. Crisostomi, K. Noui, C. Charmousis and D. Langlois,Beyond Lovelock gravity: Higher derivative metric theories,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 044034, [1710.04531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    H. T. Nieh and M. L. Yan,An Identity in Riemann-cartan Geometry,J. Math. Phys.23 (1982) 373

    1982

  61. [61]

    Holst,Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action,Phys

    S. Holst,Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 5966–5969, [gr-qc/9511026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  62. [62]

    L˚ angvik, J.-M

    M. L˚ angvik, J.-M. Ojanper¨ a, S. Raatikainen and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Higgs inflation with the Holst and the Nieh–Yan term,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083514, [2007.12595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Shaposhnikov, A

    M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov and S. Zell,Higgs inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity,JCAP02(2021) 008, [2007.14978]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    H. T. Nieh,Gauss-Bonnet and Bianchi Identities in Riemann-cartan Type Gravitational Theories,J. Math. Phys.21(1980) 1439

    1980

  65. [65]

    O. V. Babourova and B. N. Frolov,Gauss-Bonnet type identity in Weyl-Cartan space,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12(1997) 3665, [gr-qc/9609004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  66. [66]

    H. T. Nieh and C. N. Yang,A torsional topological invariant,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22(2007) 5237–5244

    2007

  67. [67]

    Borunda, B

    M. Borunda, B. Janssen and M. Bastero-Gil,Palatini versus metric formulation in higher curvature gravity,JCAP11(2008) 008, [0804.4440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  68. [68]

    H. T. Nieh,A Torsional Topological Invariant, inConference in Honor of C.N. Yang’s 85th Birthday: Statistical Physics, High Energy, Condensed Matter and Mathematical Physics, pp. 29–37, 2008,1309.0915

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [70]

    H. T. Nieh,Torsional Topological Invariants,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 104045, [1804.07440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [71]

    Janssen, A

    B. Janssen, A. Jim´ enez-Cano and J. A. Orejuela,A non-trivial connection for the metric-affine Gauss-Bonnet theory inD= 4,Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 42–48, [1903.00280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [72]

    Janssen and A

    B. Janssen and A. Jim´ enez-Cano,On the topological character of metric-affine Lovelock Lagrangians in critical dimensions,Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134996, [1907.12100]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [73]

    Iosifidis,Riemann tensor and Gauss–Bonnet density in metric-affine cosmology,Class

    D. Iosifidis,Riemann tensor and Gauss–Bonnet density in metric-affine cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 195028, [2104.10192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [74]

    Banados and M

    M. Banados and M. Henneaux,Palatini Gauss-Bonnet theory,JHEP03(2026) 064, [2511.20903]

    arXiv 2026

  74. [75]

    Hassan and S

    A. Hassan and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Inflation with the Chern-Simons term in the Palatini formulation, JCAP01(2025) 087, [2408.14983]

    arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    Wetterich,Can Inflation Explain Small Density Fluctuations in the Universe?,Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Can Inflation Explain Small Density Fluctuations in the Universe?,Nucl. Phys. B324(1989) 141–156

    1989

  76. [77]

    B. M. N. Carter and I. P. Neupane,Towards inflation and dark energy cosmologies from modified Gauss-Bonnet theory,JCAP06(2006) 004, [hep-th/0512262]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  77. [78]

    Satoh and J

    M. Satoh and J. Soda,Higher Curvature Corrections to Primordial Fluctuations in Slow-roll Inflation,JCAP09(2008) 019, [0806.4594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [79]

    van de Bruck and C

    C. van de Bruck and C. Longden,Higgs Inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet term in the Jordan Frame,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 063519, [1512.04768]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [80]

    Rashidi and K

    N. Rashidi and K. Nozari,Gauss-Bonnet Inflation after Planck2018,Astrophys. J.890(1,

  80. [81]

    Mudrunka and K

    K. Mudrunka and K. Nakayama,Inflation with Gauss-Bonnet correction: beyond slow-roll, JCAP02(2026) 070, [2504.01365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.