Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The paper shows that the quantum-gravitational isotropization of Bianchi-I universes in the modified loop quantum cosmology model mLQC-I comes from an emergent Planckian de Sitter phase, leaving the post-bounce universe nonclassical, and th

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:54 UTC pith:U5QW4CJU

load-bearing objection The no-classical-exit point is the real result; the non-genericity claim needs more than two runs. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.18175 v3 pith:U5QW4CJU submitted 2026-03-18 gr-qc

The Steep Price of No Hair in a Modified Loop Quantum Cosmology

Meysam Motaharfar , Parampreet Singh This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.60.Pp98.80.Qc
keywords mLQC-Iloop quantum cosmologyBianchi-I spacetimesanisotropic shear dampingemergent de Sitter phasePlanckian cosmological constantclassicality conditionquantum bounce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

An anisotropic, spatially flat Bianchi-I universe in the modified loop quantum cosmology model mLQC-I can indeed be isotropized across the bounce, but this paper shows that the mechanism is an emergent Planckian cosmological constant, not a new quantum effect, and it exacts a steep price. In the post-bounce branch the universe grows to macroscopic size while the curvature remains Planckian and the connection variables freeze at a quantum value, so the universe never becomes classical. The mechanism is also non-generic: it fails for vacuum spacetimes and for a range of initial conditions with dust, radiation, and massless scalar fields, where the universe stays anisotropic but becomes classical. The paper thereby clarifies that in this model isotropization and classicality are mutually exclusive for the studied states, and that a macroscopic scale factor alone does not certify classicality. This matters because it determines whether mLQC-I can deliver a viable, classical, isotropic late-time universe without additional ingredients.

Core claim

The central claim is that the damping of anisotropic shear in Bianchi-I mLQC-I is not a new quantum effect but the action of an emergent de Sitter phase with a Planckian cosmological constant in the post-bounce branch. Starting from large classical contracting universes with μ̄_i c_i near zero, the numerics yield μ̄_i c_i → −π/2 after the bounce, Planckian Ricci and Kretschmann scalars, and almost identical expansion of the three directional scale factors. Under the paper's classicality condition (μ̄_i c_i → nπ), this is a macroscopic but non-classical universe with no graceful exit. The mechanism is non-generic: vacuum spacetimes and several perfect-fluid initial data show no emergent cosmo

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the emergent Planckian de Sitter phase: a quantum-gravitationally generated, Planck-scale effective cosmological constant in the post-bounce branch that drives late-time exponential expansion and washes out anisotropic shear, exactly as a classical cosmological constant does in the Kasner–de Sitter solution. The classicality diagnostic is the condition μ̄_i c_i → nπ (integer n), under which the effective Hamiltonian's sin(μ̄_i c_i)/μ̄_i terms reduce to the classical connection variables; in the isotropized cases the paper finds μ̄_i c_i → −π/2 instead. Together these elements—the emergent de Sitter attractor and the classicality diagnostic—determine whether a tr

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions stand or fall with the assumption that the effective Hamilton's equations used in the numerics faithfully represent the full quantum evolution of Bianchi-I mLQC-I and that convergence of μ̄_i c_i to integer multiples of π is a complete test of classicality.

What would settle it

Numerically scan the admissible initial-condition space for dust- or radiation-filled Bianchi-I mLQC-I and look for a single trajectory that simultaneously exhibits strong post-bounce shear damping (σ² → 0) and classicality (μ̄_i c_i → nπ) at macroscopic volume; one such trajectory would falsify the claimed mutual exclusivity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In Bianchi-I mLQC-I, an isotropized post-bounce universe is necessarily a quantum-gravity-dominated de Sitter spacetime; classicality in the post-bounce branch requires sacrificing isotropization for the studied initial data.
  • A macroscopic, slowly expanding universe is not by itself evidence of classicality; the connection variables and curvature invariants must also be checked on both sides of the bounce.
  • The isotropization mechanism cannot be invoked for vacuum anisotropic universes; it appears only when matter is present, and even then only for selected initial conditions and equations of state.
  • The limitation is specific to the Bianchi-I version of mLQC-I; other Thiemann-type regularizations without the emergent Planckian cosmological constant, such as mLQC-II, are expected to avoid these two problems.
  • The emergent de Sitter phase explains why the previously reported shear damping is neither a genuinely new quantum effect nor universal: it is the classical de Sitter attractor driven by a quantum-generated cosmological constant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the mechanism's robustness by finely scanning initial conditions and matter equations of state; if the post-bounce emergent de Sitter branch occupies only a narrow basin, the practical viability of mLQC-I is even more restricted than the paper claims.
  • The mutual exclusivity of isotropization and classicality suggests a dynamical selection rule: observations of a homogeneous, isotropic, classical universe would indirectly rule out the initial data that select the Planckian post-bounce branch in mLQC-I.
  • A natural next step is to compare full quantum evolution with the effective equations for these Bianchi-I states; if they disagree, the no-classical-exit conclusion could be an artifact of the effective approximation rather than a property of the quantum theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the effective dynamics of modified loop quantum cosmology-I (mLQC-I) in Bianchi-I spacetimes, focusing on claims by Gan et al. that quantum geometry generically isotropizes the universe. Using the effective Hamilton equations (3.6)-(3.7), the authors reproduce an isotropizing dust-filled run and show that the post-bounce isotropization is tied to an emergent Planckian de Sitter phase: the directional scale factors expand exponentially, the shear scalar decays, but the connection variables \bar\mu_i c_i plateau near -\pi/2 and the curvature invariants remain Planckian, so the universe does not reach the classical regime despite becoming macroscopic. They also present a vacuum run and a radiation run in which no isotropization occurs and the universe returns to classical anisotropic behavior. From these examples and a sentence about additional dust and massless scalar runs, the paper concludes that the isotropization mechanism is non-generic and that choosing it entails a steep price: no graceful exit to a classical universe.

Significance. If the central numerical results are correct, the paper provides a useful clarification of a recent claim in [1]: the anisotropic shear damping seen in Bianchi-I mLQC-I is not an independent quantum-gravitational novelty but a manifestation of the emergent de Sitter phase already known in isotropic mLQC-I. The observation that macroscopic volume does not imply classicality, with explicit curvature-invariant evidence, is a valuable cautionary result. The paper's main new assertion, however, is that the isotropization mechanism is non-generic; this claim is supported only by a small set of illustrative runs, with no code, no parameter scan, and no quantitative characterization of the 'range' of initial conditions. The concrete vacuum and radiation counterexamples are significant, but they establish non-universality rather than non-genericity over a measure-zero or measure-nonzero region.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. IV.B] The central 'non-generic' claim is not supported by the evidence presented. Only one vacuum run (Figs. 3-4) and one radiation run (Figs. 5-6) are shown; dust and massless scalar non-isotropizing examples are only asserted in one sentence. There is no scan over initial conditions, no measure or quantitative definition of the 'range', and the text itself states that 'more numerical investigation is needed to understand the connection between the magnitude of energy density and the emergence of the cosmological constant.' A finite set of counterexamples disproves universal isotropization, but the abstract and conclusions go further by saying the mechanism fails for 'a range of admissible initial conditions.' This claim should either be backed by a systematic parameter scan or weakened to 'there exist admissible initial conditions for which isotropization fails.'
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (3.4)] Equation (3.4) is mathematically incorrect as stated. The limit \sin(\bar\mu_i c_i)/\bar\mu_i \to c_i holds only when \bar\mu_i c_i \to 0 (with c_i held fixed). For \bar\mu_i c_i \to n\pi with n\neq 0, the sine vanishes and the ratio does not tend to c_i. The runs in this paper use initial values close to zero, so the n=0 interpretation is the relevant one, and the conclusion that \bar\mu_i c_i \to -\pi/2 is non-classical remains valid under the correct condition \bar\mu_i c_i \to 0. Nevertheless, the formal statement and the repeated 'goes to the n\pi value' language in Sec. V should be corrected to avoid an incorrect classicality diagnostic.
  3. [Abstract vs. Secs. IV, V] The abstract introduces 'cigar-like evolution' and says the non-genericity result is demonstrated 'for a class of physically admissible initial conditions corresponding to cigar-like evolution,' also stating that cigar-like evolution is prevalent unless matter dominates over anisotropic shear. The body of the paper never defines cigar-like versus point-like Kasner behavior, does not classify the chosen initial conditions (p_i, c_i, \rho) according to Kasner exponents, and does not compute matter-to-shear ratios. Thus the abstract's qualifier is unsupported and is in tension with the body's broader 'some range of initial conditions' language in Secs. IV.B and V. Either add the Kasner/matter-shear classification or remove this claim from the abstract.
  4. [Sec. V] The statement 'the isotropization mechanism and the classicality conditions are mutually exclusive' is an overgeneralization. The paper demonstrates one isotropizing dust run (Figs. 1-2) and two non-isotropizing runs; it does not provide a general argument or survey showing that no isotropizing solution with classical post-bounce behavior exists. The mutual exclusivity is plausible from the isotropic analogy, but the anisotropic phase space is richer. The conclusion should be restricted to the studied class of solutions unless a general proof or systematic scan is supplied.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV] No numerical integration details are provided: no integrator method, time-step, tolerances, or code availability. Since the paper's main novel claim rests on numerical runs, adding these details would substantially improve reproducibility.
  2. [Sec. V, p. 14] The phrase 'does not isotropize in the post-branch universe' should read 'post-bounce branch.
  3. [Fig. 2] The Ricci scalar panel uses a linear vertical scale spanning 0-4, which makes the late-time plateau difficult to read; a log scale or inset would clarify the Planckian constant behavior.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper's conclusions are numerical consequences of the stated effective equations, not reduced to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—emergent de Sitter behavior, lack of a classical post-bounce exit, and non-generic isotropization—are obtained by solving the effective Hamilton's equations (3.6)-(3.7) for specified initial conditions, not by fitting parameters or by defining the conclusion into the setup. The 'classicality condition' μ̄_i c_i → nπ is introduced as a limit in which the effective Hamiltonian reduces to the classical one, and the paper independently checks curvature invariants (R and K) before concluding the post-bounce universe remains quantum. The emergent-de-Sitter interpretation is supported by the paper's own numerical outputs: μ̄_i c_i → −π/2, constant Planckian curvature invariants, and decaying shear. This is an interpretation of computed quantities, not a circular reduction. Self-citations appear (e.g., Refs. [29,47,48,56]), but they are used as background or as corroboration ('in agreement with the findings in Ref. [56]'), and the derivation does not rest on an unverified uniqueness theorem or on an ansatz smuggled in from the authors' prior work. The non-genericity claim is under-supported—only two illustrative runs are shown, and the text admits 'more numerical investigation is needed'—but that is an evidentiary weakness, not circularity. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effective dynamics of prior work, a classicality diagnostic, and selected numerical runs. No free constants are fitted to external data, but the initial data and densities are hand-chosen and function as control parameters that determine whether the emergent de Sitter phase appears.

free parameters (3)
  • Initial triads (p1,p2,p3) = 1000, 2000, 3000 (all runs)
    Hand-chosen physical-volume initial data; the outcome (de Sitter vs classical, isotropization vs not) depends on them.
  • Initial connections (c1,c2) per run = dust: −0.13,−0.12; vacuum: −0.03,−0.05; radiation: −0.3,−0.2
    Free initial data; c3 is fixed by the Hamiltonian constraint. Different values produce or destroy isotropization, so the counterexamples are driven by these choices.
  • Matter energy density = ρ_m = 3.55×10^-5; ρ_r = 5×10^-7
    Hand-chosen densities for dust and radiation; the authors state that decreasing energy density removes isotropization but do not derive a threshold or systematic rule.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The effective Hamiltonian (3.1)-(3.3) and Hamilton's equations (3.6)-(3.7) describe the quantum dynamics of Bianchi-I mLQC-I.
    Taken from Refs. [1,54,55]; no comparison to the underlying quantum difference equation is made in this paper.
  • domain assumption Classicality is diagnosed by μ̄_i c_i → nπ; values near −π/2 mean the post-bounce state is quantum.
    Introduced around Eq. (3.4) and used in Section IV to infer no graceful exit.
  • standard math Constant late-time Ricci and Kretschmann scalars imply an emergent de Sitter phase with an effective cosmological constant.
    For de Sitter, R = 4Λ and K = 8Λ²/3; used to identify a Planckian Λ from Figs. 2 and 4.
  • domain assumption The numerical integrations are converged and accurate.
    No integrator, tolerances, or convergence tests are reported; all plots are single runs.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16129 in / 11300 out tokens · 115936 ms · 2026-08-02T17:54:02.018546+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A modified version of loop quantum cosmology model, the so-called mLQC-I, motivated by Thiemann's regularization of the Hamiltonian constraint, leads to the resolution of the big bang singularity and a bounce in the isotropic setting, where either the pre-bounce or post-bounce epoch is necessarily characterized by an emergent Planckian de Sitter phase. In this work we explore the Planckian physics of this mLQC-I prescription for the Bianchi-I spacetimes. We show that, as in the isotropic model, there exists an emergent de Sitter phase which naturally dampens anisotropic shear and removes cosmic hair. However, this isotropization comes at a steep price: although a macroscopic post-bounce regime is achieved, the universe does not become classical. As is well known from the Kasner solution, the classical evolution of a contracting Bianchi-I universe toward the singularity can in general be either point-like or cigar-like. However, cigar-like evolution is prevalent unless the matter content dominates over the anisotropic shear. For a class of physically admissible initial conditions corresponding to cigar-like evolution, we further demonstrate that this isotropization mechanism is non-generic. These results clarify and reinterpret recent claims by Gan et al. \cite{Gan:2025uvt} that, in anisotropic mLQC-I, quantum gravity effects generically damp anisotropic shear in a manner independent of initial conditions and matter content, and that this damping arises from a novel quantum gravity effect. Our work explains the origin of this mechanism and its limitations in the mLQC-I model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.18175 by Meysam Motaharfar, Parampreet Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The time evolution of the directional scale factors ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The time evolution of ¯µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The time evolution of the directional scale factors and mean scale factor is computed for initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The time evolution of ¯µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The time evolution of the directional scale factors and mean scale factor is computed for the initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: From these plots, one can see that the anisotropic shear remains the same at the same volume in the pre-bounce and post-bounce regimes at macroscopic sizes, similar to the case of the vacuum spacetime. In addition, the curvature invariants also become negligible in the macroscopic regime. This indicates that the model recovers the classical GR in this regime. Similarly, for dust and massless scalar fields,… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Genericness of quantum damping of cosmological shear in modified loop quantum cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    For genuine 3D collapsing Bianchi I initial conditions in mLQC-I, quantum effects damp shear exponentially after the bounce, yielding an isotropic attractor independent of matter content under the weak energy condition.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    From plots for ¯µici, we observe that although these variables begin with a value close to zero in the pre-bounce branch, all three go to a value almost equal to−π/2. This implies that a large classical contracting universe bounces to a large expanding universe, which remains in the quantum regime with no exit to the classical universe even in the macrosc...

    2000

  2. [2]

    Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,

    A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J.116, 1009-1038 (1998)

    1998

  3. [3]

    Quantum Damping of Cosmological Shear: A New Prediction from Loop Quantum Cosmologies,

    W. C. Gan, L. L. Graef, R. O. Ramos, G. S. Vicente and A. Wang, “Quantum Damping of Cosmological Shear: A New Prediction from Loop Quantum Cosmologies,” [arXiv:2510.14021 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347-356 (1981)

    1981

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020)

    2018

  6. [6]

    The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,” Phys. Rev. D64, 123522 (2001)

    2001

  7. [7]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389-393 (1982)

    1982

  8. [8]

    Kasner and mixmaster behavior in universes with equation of state w>= 1,

    J. K. Erickson, D. H. Wesley, P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, “Kasner and mixmaster behavior in universes with equation of state w>= 1,” Phys. Rev. D69, 063514 (2004)

    2004

  9. [9]

    Asymptotic behavior of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant,

    R. M. Wald, “Asymptotic behavior of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D28, 2118-2120 (1983)

    1983

  10. [10]

    Quantum nature of the big bang,

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski and P. Singh, “Quantum nature of the big bang,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 141301 (2006)

    2006

  11. [11]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report,

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, “Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report,” Class. Quant. Grav.28, 213001 (2011)

    2011

  12. [12]

    Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics,

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski and P. Singh, “Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D74, 084003 (2006)

    2006

  13. [13]

    Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: An Analytical and Numerical Investigation. I.,

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski and P. Singh, “Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: An Analytical and Numerical Investigation. I.,” Phys. Rev. D73, 124038 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Consistent Histories in Quantum Cosmology,

    D. A. Craig and P. Singh, “Consistent Histories in Quantum Cosmology,” Found. Phys.41, 371-379 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology,

    A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi and P. Singh, “Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D77, 024046 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Consistent probabilities in loop quantum cosmology,

    D. A. Craig and P. Singh, “Consistent probabilities in loop quantum cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 205008 (2013). 16

    2013

  17. [17]

    Consistent Probabilities in Wheeler-DeWitt Quantum Cosmology,

    D. A. Craig and P. Singh, “Consistent Probabilities in Wheeler-DeWitt Quantum Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D82, 123526 (2010)

    2010

  18. [18]

    Closed FR W model in Loop Quantum Cosmology,

    L. Szulc, W. Kaminski and J. Lewandowski, “Closed FR W model in Loop Quantum Cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav.24, 2621-2636 (2007); A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, P. Singh and K. Vandersloot, “Loop quantum cosmology of k=1 FR W models,” Phys. Rev. D75, 024035 (2007); K. Vandersloot, “Loop quantum cosmology and the k = - 1 R W model,” Phys. Rev. D75, 023523 (200...

    2007

  19. [19]

    Krylov Complexity in Canonical Quantum Cosmology,

    M. Motaharfar, M. R. Siebersma and P. Singh, “Krylov Complexity in Canonical Quantum Cosmology,” [arXiv:2511.17711 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi-I models,

    A. Ashtekar and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi-I models,” Phys. Rev. D79, 083535 (2009)

    2009

  21. [21]

    Towards a reduced phase space quantization in loop quantum cosmology with an inflationary potential,

    K. Giesel, B. F. Li and P. Singh, “Towards a reduced phase space quantization in loop quantum cosmology with an inflationary potential,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.12, 126024 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi type IX models,

    E. Wilson-Ewing, “Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi type IX models,” Phys. Rev. D82, 043508 (2010)

    2010

  23. [23]

    Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi type II models,

    A. Ashtekar and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi type II models,” Phys. Rev. D80, 123532 (2009)

    2009

  24. [24]

    Numerical simulations of loop quantum Bianchi-I spacetimes,

    P. Diener, A. Joe, M. Megevand and P. Singh, “Numerical simulations of loop quantum Bianchi-I spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.9, 094004 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Physical evolution in Loop Quantum Cos- mology: The Example of vacuum Bianchi-I,

    M. Martin-Benito, G. A. M. Marugan and T. Pawlowski, “Physical evolution in Loop Quantum Cos- mology: The Example of vacuum Bianchi-I,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084038 (2009)

    2009

  26. [26]

    Numerical simulations of a loop quantum cosmos: robustness of the quantum bounce and the validity of effective dynamics,

    P. Diener, B. Gupt and P. Singh, “Numerical simulations of a loop quantum cosmos: robustness of the quantum bounce and the validity of effective dynamics,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 105015 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Inhomogeneous Loop Quantum Cosmology: Hybrid Quantization of the Gowdy Model,

    L. J. Garay, M. Martin-Benito and G. A. Mena Marugan, “Inhomogeneous Loop Quantum Cosmology: Hybrid Quantization of the Gowdy Model,” Phys. Rev. D82, 044048 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: Physics of Singularity Resolution and Its Implica- tions,

    B. F. Li and P. Singh, “Loop Quantum Cosmology: Physics of Singularity Resolution and Its Implica- tions,” [arXiv:2304.05426 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Numerical evolution of squeezed and non-Gaussian states in loop quantum cosmology,

    P. Diener, B. Gupt, M. Megevand and P. Singh, “Numerical evolution of squeezed and non-Gaussian states in loop quantum cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 165006 (2014)

    2014

  30. [30]

    Contrasting features of anisotropic loop quantum cosmologies: The Role of spatial curvature,

    B. Gupt and P. Singh, “Contrasting features of anisotropic loop quantum cosmologies: The Role of spatial curvature,” Phys. Rev. D85, 044011 (2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Phenomenological implications of modified loop cosmologies: an overview,

    B. F. Li, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Phenomenological implications of modified loop cosmologies: an overview,” Front. Astron. Space Sci.8, 701417 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Novel relationship between shear and energy density at the bounce in nonsingular Bianchi-I spacetimes,

    A. M. McNamara, S. Saini and P. Singh, “Novel relationship between shear and energy density at the bounce in nonsingular Bianchi-I spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D107, 026003 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Quantization ambiguities and bounds on geometric scalars in anisotropic loop quantum cosmology,

    P. Singh and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Quantization ambiguities and bounds on geometric scalars in anisotropic loop quantum cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 035010 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    Exotic singularities and spatially curved Loop Quantum Cosmology,

    P. Singh and F. Vidotto, “Exotic singularities and spatially curved Loop Quantum Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D83, 064027 (2011)

    2011

  35. [35]

    Are loop quantum cosmos never singular?,

    P. Singh, “Are loop quantum cosmos never singular?,” Class. Quant. Grav.26, 125005 (2009)

    2009

  36. [36]

    Curvature invariants, geodesics and the strength of singularities in Bianchi-I loop quantum cosmology,

    P. Singh, “Curvature invariants, geodesics and the strength of singularities in Bianchi-I loop quantum cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D85, 104011 (2012); S. Saini and P. Singh, “Resolution of strong singu- larities and geodesic completeness in loop quantum Bianchi-II spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.23, 235006 (2017); S. Saini and P. Singh, “Generic absence...

    2012

  37. [37]

    Generic absence of strong singularities and geodesic completeness in modified loop quantum cosmologies,

    S. Saini and P. Singh, “Generic absence of strong singularities and geodesic completeness in modified loop quantum cosmologies,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, no.10, 105014 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Detailed investigation of the duration of inflation in loop quantum cosmology for a Bianchi-I universe with different inflaton potentials and initial conditions,

    K. Martineau, A. Barrau and S. Schander, “Detailed investigation of the duration of inflation in loop quantum cosmology for a Bianchi-I universe with different inflaton potentials and initial conditions,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.8, 083507 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    A quantum gravitational inflationary scenario in Bianchi-I spacetime,

    B. Gupt and P. Singh, “A quantum gravitational inflationary scenario in Bianchi-I spacetime,” Class. Quant. Grav.30, 145013 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    Non-singular bouncing universes in loop quantum 17 cosmology,

    P. Singh, K. Vandersloot and G. V. Vereshchagin, “Non-singular bouncing universes in loop quantum 17 cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D74, 043510 (2006)

    2006

  41. [41]

    Loop quantum gravity and the cyclic universe,

    M. Bojowald, R. Maartens and P. Singh, “Loop quantum gravity and the cyclic universe,” Phys. Rev. D70, 083517 (2004)

    2004

  42. [42]

    Non-singular Ekpyrotic/Cyclic model in Loop Quantum Cosmology,

    T. Cailleteau, P. Singh and K. Vandersloot, “Non-singular Ekpyrotic/Cyclic model in Loop Quantum Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D80, 124013 (2009)

    2009

  43. [43]

    Ekpyrotic loop quantum cosmology,

    E. Wilson-Ewing, “Ekpyrotic loop quantum cosmology,” JCAP08, 015 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    Quantum spin dynamics (QSD),

    T. Thiemann, “Quantum spin dynamics (QSD),” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 839-873 (1998); T. Thiemann, “Quantum spin dynamics (qsd). 2.,” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 875-905 (1998)

    1998

  45. [45]

    Ekpyrosis in quantum gravitational anisotropic bouncing models,

    R. Brown, A. M. McNamara, S. Saini and P. Singh, “Ekpyrosis in quantum gravitational anisotropic bouncing models,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.12, 126006 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Cosmological Effective Hamiltonian from full Loop Quantum Gravity Dynamics,

    A. Dapor and K. Liegener, “Cosmological Effective Hamiltonian from full Loop Quantum Gravity Dynamics,” Phys. Lett. B785, 506-510 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Alternative quantization of the Hamiltonian in loop quantum cosmology II: Including the Lorentz term,

    J. Yang, Y. Ding and Y. Ma, “Alternative quantization of the Hamiltonian in loop quantum cosmology II: Including the Lorentz term,” Phys. Lett. B682, 1-7 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    Emergent de Sitter Epoch of the Quantum Cosmos from Loop Quantum Cosmology,

    M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener and T. Paw lowski, “Emergent de Sitter Epoch of the Quantum Cosmos from Loop Quantum Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no.8, 081303 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    Towards Cosmological Dynamics from Loop Quantum Gravity,

    B. F. Li, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Towards Cosmological Dynamics from Loop Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.8, 084029 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    Genericness of pre-inflationary dynamics and probability of the desired slow-roll inflation in modified loop quantum cosmologies,

    B. F. Li, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Genericness of pre-inflationary dynamics and probability of the desired slow-roll inflation in modified loop quantum cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.6, 063513 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    classicality condition

    in comparison to standard LQC. For the isotropic model, the quantum Hamiltonian constraint yields a fourth-order quantum difference equation rather than a second-order equation in standard LQC [52]. It turns out that singularities are generically resolved as in the standard LQC [35]. In- terestingly, it has been shown that mLQC-I leads into an emergent de...

    2000

  52. [52]

    Qualitative dynamics and inflationary attractors in loop cosmology,

    B. F. Li, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Qualitative dynamics and inflationary attractors in loop cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.6, 066016 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    Primordial scalar power spectrum from the hybrid approach in loop cosmologies,

    B. F. Li, J. Olmedo, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Primordial scalar power spectrum from the hybrid approach in loop cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D102, 126025 (2020); B. F. Li, P. Singh and A. Wang, “Primordial power spectrum from the dressed metric approach in loop cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.8, 086004 (2020); B. F. Li, M. Motaharfar and P. Singh, “Constraini...

    2020

  54. [54]

    Von Neumann stability of modified loop quantum cosmologies,

    S. Saini and P. Singh, “Von Neumann stability of modified loop quantum cosmologies,” Class. Quant. Grav.36, no.10, 105010 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Loop quantum gravity effects might restrict a cyclic evolution,

    B. F. Li and P. Singh, “Loop quantum gravity effects might restrict a cyclic evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.4, 046013 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Dapor-Liegener Formalism of Loop Quantum Cos- mology for Bianchi-I Spacetimes,

    A. Garcia-Quismondo and G. A. Mena Marugan, “Dapor-Liegener Formalism of Loop Quantum Cos- mology for Bianchi-I Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.2, 023520 (2020)

    2020

  57. [57]

    The Martin-Benito-Mena Marugan-Olmedo pre- scription for the Dapor-Liegener model of Loop Quantum Cosmology,

    A. Garc ´ ıa-Quismondo and G. A. Mena Marug´ an, “The Martin-Benito-Mena Marugan-Olmedo pre- scription for the Dapor-Liegener model of Loop Quantum Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.8, 083505 (2019)

    2019

  58. [58]

    Classicality and uniqueness in the loop quantization of Bianchi-I spacetimes,

    M. Motaharfar, P. Singh and E. Thareja, “Classicality and uniqueness in the loop quantization of Bianchi-I spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 086013 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations,

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt, “Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations,” Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003

    2003

  60. [60]

    Quantum gravitational Kasner transitions in Bianchi-I spacetime,

    B. Gupt and P. Singh, “Quantum gravitational Kasner transitions in Bianchi-I spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D86, 024034 (2012)

    2012

  61. [61]

    Is classical flat Kasner spacetime flat in quantum gravity?,

    P. Singh, “Is classical flat Kasner spacetime flat in quantum gravity?,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, no.08, 1642001 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    The loop quantum cosmology bounce as a Kasner transition,

    E. Wilson-Ewing, “The loop quantum cosmology bounce as a Kasner transition,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no.6, 065005 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    A generalized Kasner transition for bouncing Bianchi I models in modified gravity theories,

    M. de Cesare and E. Wilson-Ewing, “A generalized Kasner transition for bouncing Bianchi I models in modified gravity theories,” JCAP12, 039 (2019)

    2019