Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Visualizing spin-polarization of an altermagnet KV$_2$Se$_2$O via spin-selective tunneling

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin-selective tunneling with a topological insulator tip reveals d-wave altermagnetic spin splitting in KV2Se2O.

desk verdict A plausible spin-selective STM visualization of a d-wave altermagnet, but the central claim rests on a tip mechanism the authors admit is unresolved—worth refereeing, not desk rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.21969 v2 pith:WTAK7O5L submitted 2026-03-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Guofei Yang , Chuang Li , Chengwei Wang , Xudong Zhao , Yifan Wan , Hengrui Gui , Guoqing Zeng , Saizheng Cao
show 11 more authors
Chuqiao Hu Qihe Yu Yujia Zhang Dong Chen Yu Liu Yu Song Yongjun Zhang Fei Liu Lun-Hui Hu Lin Jiao Huiqiu Yuan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismKV2Se2Ospin-selectivetunnelingscanningmicroscopyquasi-particleinterferenced-wavespinsplittingSmB6nanowiretipspin-densitywave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that KV2Se2O is a metallic d-wave altermagnet by directly visualizing its momentum-dependent spin splitting. Using a SmB6 nanowire tip as a spin-selective scanning tunneling microscopy probe, the authors observe a bias-reversing anisotropy in quasi-particle interference patterns that is absent with a conventional tungsten tip. They interpret this anisotropy as the signature of oppositely spin-polarized Fermi-surface segments along orthogonal directions, matching the d-wave form factor predicted by symmetry. If correct, the work provides microscopic, real-space and momentum-space evidence linking crystal symmetry, electronic structure, and spin polarization in an altermagnet, and introduces a minimally invasive probe for such materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SmB6 nanowire tip, which acts as an intrinsic directional spin filter owing to the helical spin–momentum locking of its topological surface states; the tunneling current is spin-polarized and its orientation can be flipped by bias voltage rather than by an external magnetic field. The quantitative tool is the QPI difference map D(q) = I(q) − R·I(q), where R is a π/2 rotation operator, which isolates the anisotropy between orthogonal scattering directions. This is supplemented by a minimal tight-binding model incorporating both altermagnetic and spin-density-wave order, which reproduces the measured QPI patterns and confirms the d-wave form factor of the spin splitti

What would settle it

Spin-resolved ARPES on a single magnetic domain of KV2Se2O that resolves the predicted d-wave spin-split bands would directly confirm the electronic structure; alternatively, applying the same SmB6-tip protocol to a nonmagnetic isostructural compound and observing the same bias-dependent QPI anisotropy would indicate the effect is tip-related or orbital rather than altermagnetic in origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that KV2Se2O exhibits d-wave altermagnetic spin splitting that can be visualized with an SmB6 nanowire STM tip. The authors report that QPI maps acquired with the spin-sensitive SmB6 tip show a pronounced anisotropy between the qx and qy directions, with a π phase shift between standing waves along x and y, and that this anisotropy reverses sign when the bias voltage is reversed. No such bias-dependent anisotropy appears with the spin-degenerate W-tip. Because the SmB6 tip acts as an intrinsic spin filter whose spin orientation flips with bias, the observed reversal is attributed to spin-selective tunneling into oppositely spin-polarized d-wave bands. Combined with band-

Load-bearing premise

The entire spin-selective interpretation rests on the assumption that the SmB6 nanowire tip is a dependable intrinsic spin filter whose tunneling spin orientation reverses with bias voltage, a mechanism the paper itself states is not yet resolved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • KV2Se2O is established as a tunable platform for studying spin–valley locking, Fermi-surface instability, and unconventional magnetism without net magnetization.
  • SmB6-tip-based STM becomes a general method for imaging compensated spin textures and could detect the hidden altermagnetic even–odd layer effect in few-layer samples.
  • The observation opens pathways to anomalous Hall and Nernst effects, nonrelativistic spin-polarized currents, magneto-optical Kerr effect, and chiral magnon excitations in this material class.
  • The van der Waals layered structure and robust altermagnetic order make KV2Se2O a candidate for efficient spin-current generation, tunable magnetic tunnel junctions, and low-dissipation magnonic devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bias-flipping spin-filter mechanism of the SmB6 tip is independently confirmed, this approach could become a standard tool for nanoscale imaging of altermagnetic order without the stray-field perturbations inherent to ferromagnetic tips.
  • The paper notes two concurrent STM studies reporting similar results; if these are mutually consistent, the d-wave altermagnetic interpretation of KV2Se2O would be substantially strengthened.
  • Because the reported AM spin splitting (~1.8 eV) is much larger than the SDW gap (~40 meV), the material likely remains a robust d-wave altermagnet even when the spin-density-wave order reconstructs the surface, which could be tested by applying strain or doping to tune the SDW without destroying the spin splitting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and quasi-particle interference (QPI) measurements on the candidate altermagnet KV2Se2O. Using a conventional W tip and a SmB6 nanowire tip, the authors compare real-space dI/dV maps and their Fourier transforms around native impurities. They find that the W tip yields isotropic QPI between qx and qy, while the SmB6 tip yields a bias-dependent anisotropy that reverses sign with bias polarity. This anisotropy is interpreted as spin-selective tunneling from the SmB6 tip, revealing momentum-dependent d-wave altermagnetic spin splitting in KV2Se2O. A minimal tight-binding model including altermagnetic and SDW order is used to simulate the W-tip QPI, and the paper claims 'unambiguous real-space and momentum space evidence' for the AM spin splitting, with 'd-wave type AM spin-splitting band structures directly visualized.'

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this would be a significant advance: a direct, microscopic visualization of altermagnetic spin polarization in a candidate d-wave altermagnet, using a non-magnetic topological-insulator tip as a spin filter. The main experimental strengths are the controlled comparison between a spin-insensitive W tip and a spin-sensitive SmB6 tip, the bias-reversal control, the use of multiple impurities, and the minimal-model QPI simulation that captures the W-tip data. However, the load-bearing assumption—that the SmB6 nanowire tip acts as a reliable, bias-flippable spin filter—is explicitly stated in the manuscript as 'not resolved yet.' No in-situ calibration on a known spin-polarized surface is provided, and the model simulation is only for the total-LDOS W-tip channel, not for the spin-selective SmB6 channel. Thus, the evidence is suggestive and well-controlled at the level of sample LDOS, but it does not yet uniquely establish the spin-polarization interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Spin-selective tunneling mechanism (around Figs. 3G,H and 4; text near 'we attributed this behavior to spin-selective tu] The central claim rests on the SmB6 tip acting as an intrinsic spin filter whose spin orientation can be flipped by bias voltage. The paper explicitly states that this mechanism is 'not resolved yet' (ref. [49]), and no in-situ calibration on a known spin-polarized surface is provided. The W-tip baseline controls for total-LDOS effects, but it does not control for bias-dependent tip matrix-element effects, orbital selectivity of SmB6 surface states, or nanowire-geometry interference. A bias-dependent anisotropy in the SmB6 tip alone could reproduce the D(q) sign reversal without any altermagnetic spin splitting. Please provide a calibration of the SmB6 tip on a known ferromagnetic or spin-polarized surface, or an independent confirmation (e.g., spin-resolved STS with a ferromagnetic tip) to verify the spin-filtering assumption.
  2. [Fig. 3C,D] The real-space comparison between W and SmB6 tips is made at different bias voltages: 60 mV for the W tip and 70 mV for the SmB6 tip. Since QPI patterns are strongly bias-dependent, the observed anisotropy could be partially a voltage effect rather than a spin effect. The authors should acquire both tips at the same bias voltages, or at a series of matched voltages, to rule out this trivial source of anisotropy.
  3. [Fig. 2D and QPI simulation] The theoretical QPI simulation shown in Fig. 2D is for the total LDOS (spin-insensitive W-tip channel) and reproduces the W-tip data. It does not model the spin-selective tunneling of the SmB6 tip. Therefore, it cannot validate the interpretation of the bias-dependent D(q) maps in Fig. 4G,H. A spin-resolved QPI simulation—including a spin-dependent tunneling matrix element that flips with bias—should be provided and compared quantitatively to the SmB6-tip data. Without this, the connection between the observed D(q) sign reversal and the d-wave spin structure remains an assumption.
  4. [Spin-conserved scattering assumption (Fig. 3G,H and accompanying text)] The interpretation of the π phase shift as spin polarization assumes that impurity scattering is spin-conserved and that the d-wave spin structure from prior theory is valid. This is reasonable but not demonstrated. The paper should present a direct calculation of the spin-resolved QPI for the proposed d-wave altermagnet with the SmB6 tip, showing that the expected D(q) pattern has opposite signs for qx and qy and reverses with bias. This would make the assignment from data to spin polarization less circular and more quantitative.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1C caption] Typo: 'have of K atoms' should be 'half of K atoms.'
  2. [Page 5, top] Typo: 'an novel spin-sensitive tunneling process' should be 'a novel spin-sensitive tunneling process.'
  3. [Page 8, bottom] Typo: 'spin-polarized stipes' should be 'spin-polarized stripes.'
  4. [Page 10, text near Fig. 4] Typo: 'high spin sensitively' should be 'high spin sensitivity.'
  5. [Fig. 2F caption/text] The relation q = 2k is used to extract dispersion. This is only valid for simple intra-band scattering without umklapp or surface reconstruction effects. The text should clarify why this relation applies to the dominant scattering vectors here, especially given the sqrt(2)-reconstruction and SDW folding.
  6. [Fig. 1E and SDW gap] The text says the SDW gap is approximately 40 meV, but the dI/dV spectra show a gap feature within -15 to +30 mV. Please clarify how 40 meV is extracted (peak-to-peak? half-width?) to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: raw QPI data are independent, but the spin-polarization interpretation is carried by an overlapping-author citation whose mechanism the paper itself marks unresolved.

  1. self citation load bearing [SmB6-tip premise, Introduction (p.2) and Fig. 3 interpretation (pp.8-9)]
    "When fabricated as a nanowire scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) tip, SmB6 acts as an intrinsic directional spin filter [48, 49]: the tunneling current is spin-polarized and the spin orientation could be flipped by bias voltage... We attributed this behavior to spin-selective tunneling of the SmB6 tip, while the underlying mechanism is not resolved yet [49]. By analogy, the π phase shift in QPIs between the +x and −y directions on KV2Se2O actually reveals spin splitting in momentum space"

    The central claim that the D(q) sign reversal is momentum-space spin splitting rests on the SmB6 tip's bias-flippable spin polarization. The only support offered is the authors' own prior work [48,49], with [49] explicitly stating that the mechanism is unresolved. No independent in-situ calibration of the tip's spin orientation on a known spin-polarized surface is provided, so the sign reversal could in principle be a bias-dependent tip artifact rather than altermagnetic spin splitting. The interpretation is thus partially loaded onto a self-citation whose key mechanism the paper itself marks as unexplained.

full rationale

The paper's main observables — the W-tip QPI dispersion and the SmB6-tip bias-reversing qx/qy anisotropy — are genuine experimental data and are not generated by the d-wave model. The d-wave altermagnetic assignment is made from spin-space symmetry arguments and prior ARPES/theory, not from fitting the same QPI data, and the QPI simulation is a consistency check rather than the sole evidence. The paper even notes two independent STM studies with similar results [60,61], providing external corroboration. The significant caveat, which prevents a score of 0–2, is that the spin-selective tip premise is load-bearing for the spin-polarization interpretation and is supported by overlapping-author citations, including an arXiv preprint that explicitly states the underlying mechanism is not resolved. This is a self-citation-based weak link in the inference chain, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction; the experimental anisotropy remains independent content. Score 4 reflects partial self-citation load-bearing with an otherwise self-contained measurement.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or entities are introduced. The paper's central claim rests on two domain assumptions: the material is a d-wave altermagnet as previously predicted, and the SmB6 tip provides bias-reversible spin selectivity despite an unresolved mechanism. The model for the QPI pattern has unstated parameters that could introduce hidden fitting, and the SDW gap is an experimentally fitted scale used in the model.

free parameters (3)
  • SDW gap size = ~40 meV
    Extracted from dI/dV spectra (Fig. 1E) and used as an input in the minimal model for band structure and QPI simulation (Fig. 2C).
  • Minimal model tight-binding parameters
    The model incorporates AM and SDW orders, but parameter values are not given in the main text; they are deferred to the Supplementary Materials, so it is unknown whether they were fitted to the experimental QPI data.
  • AM spin-splitting energy scale = ~1.8 eV
    Used to justify that AM character dominates over the SDW gap; value appears to come from calculation rather than a fit to the present data, but the source is not explicit in the main text.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption KV2Se2O has d-wave altermagnetic symmetry with spin-space operations [Us||C4z] and [Us||M1-10], lifting spin degeneracy except along kx = ±ky.
    Taken from prior theory and ARPES work (refs. 4, 33); the paper uses this symmetry to interpret the observed QPI anisotropy as altermagnetic.
  • domain assumption SmB6 nanowire tip acts as an intrinsic directional spin filter whose spin orientation can be flipped by bias voltage.
    Assumed from refs. 48 and 49, but the paper notes the mechanism is 'not resolved yet'; central to the spin-selective interpretation.
  • domain assumption Elastic scattering around impurities conserves spin.
    Used to connect momentum-space spin polarization to the real-space QPI phase shift; stated in the discussion around Fig. 3G-H.
  • domain assumption The √2a×√2a surface reconstruction and SDW order do not destroy the underlying altermagnetic spin structure.
    The paper argues the SDW gap (~40 meV) is much smaller than AM splitting (~1.8 eV) and that impurities do not perturb the orders; this is an assumption about the robustness of the magnetic state.
  • standard math Standard Fourier relation q = 2k for quasiparticle interference and standard symmetry group theory.
    Used implicitly to convert real-space standing waves to momentum-space scattering vectors and to derive spin-splitting constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Visualizing spin-polarization of an altermagnet KV$_2$Se$_2$O via spin-selective tunneling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WTAK7O5L

@misc{pith2026260321969,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Visualizing spin-polarization of an altermagnet KV$_2$Se$_2$O via spin-selective tunneling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WTAK7O5L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.21969}
}
read the original abstract

Altermagnetism, a recently identified magnetic phase that combines vanishing net magnetization with momentum-dependent spin splitting, challenges the conventional dichotomy between ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. While several candidate materials have been proposed, direct experimental evidence linking crystal symmetry, electronic structure and d-wave spin polarization remains scarce. Here we report the visualization of a metallic d-wave altermagnet in KV2Se2O. Through spin-selective scanning tunneling microscopy powered by a topological insulator tip, we uncover symmetry-protected momentum-dependent spin splitting that follows a characteristic d-wave form factor. Our results establish KV2Se2O as a tunable platform to study the interplay between spin-valley locking, Fermi-surface instability and unconventional magnetism, and open a pathway toward symmetry-engineered spintronics without net magnetization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.21969 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stripe-Order Altermagnetism: Nematic Spin Splitting beyond the $l$-Wave Classification

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stripe-ordered antiferromagnets with coexisting orbital order realize a mirror-governed 'nematic' altermagnetism beyond the rotation-based l-wave classification, with model realizations and distinguishing spin-transpo...

  2. Coupled Spin-Density-Wave and Bond-Order Driven Metal-Insulator Transition in Altermagnetic CsCr$_2$S$_2$O

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pre-existing C-AFM altermagnetism plus correlations couple a secondary dxz SDW to Cr–S bond order, producing the structural MIT in CsCr2S2O.

  3. Orbital-Selective Mott Transition and Correlation-Amplified Charge Ordering in the Altermagnet CsCr$_2$S$_2$O

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dynamical correlations amplify S-distortion-seeded dyz charge asymmetry between Cr sites, driving the Verwey-type MIT in altermagnetic CsCr2S2O; Te substitution is predicted to suppress it.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [49]

    Banerjee, A

    S. Banerjee, A. Aishwarya, F. Liu, L. Jiao, V. Madhavan, E. J. Mele, and P. Coleman, Axionic tunneling from a topological Kondo insulator 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05057 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.05057 2025

  2. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal sym- metry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  3. [2]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  4. [3]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  5. [4]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromag- netic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  6. [5]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferro- magnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022). 13

    2022

  8. [7]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan, X. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P...

    2024

  4. [11]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degen- eracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Y.-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X.-R. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, X.-M. Ma, Y.-J. Hao, M.-Y. Zhu, W. Liu, M. Zeng, S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, J. Ding, S. Mo, K. Tanaka, M. Arita, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, J. Wrachtrup, Y. Huang, R.-H. He, S. Qiao, Q. Liu, and C...

    2024

  6. [13]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L.ˇSmejkal,et al., Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, N. Wind,et al., Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO 2, Sci. Adv.10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  8. [15]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Direct obser- vation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025). 14

    2025

  10. [17]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  11. [18]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao,et al., Three-dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nat. Commun.16, 1442 (2025)

    2025

  12. [19]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin-split states in metals, Phys. Rev. B41, 6820 (1990)

    1990

  13. [20]

    Ikeda and Y

    H. Ikeda and Y. Ohashi, Theory of unconventional spin density wave: A possible mechanism of the micromagnetism in U-based heavy fermion compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3723 (1998)

    1998

  14. [21]

    Wu and S.-C

    C. Wu and S.-C. Zhang, Dynamic generation of spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 036403 (2004)

    2004

  15. [22]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    2007

  16. [23]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  17. [24]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Different facets of unconventional magnetism, Nat. Phys.21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  18. [25]

    Z. Liu, M. Wei, W. Peng, D. Hou, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Multipolar anisotropy in anomalous Hall effect from spin-group symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. X15, 031006 (2025)

    2025

  19. [26]

    Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Symmetry classification of magnetic orders and emergence of spin-orbit magnetism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20739 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  21. [28]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermagnetism: A chemical perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 2257 (2025)

    2025

  23. [30]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: an unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 100162 (2025)

    2025

  24. [31]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025). 15

    2025

  25. [32]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L. ˇSmejkal, Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of altermagnetism, Nature 649, 837 (2026)

    2026

  26. [33]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei,et al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  27. [34]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  28. [35]

    M. Hu, Z. Song, J. Cheng, G. Qu, Z. Li, Y. Huang, J. Zhu, G. Zhang, D. Tian, L. Chen, et al., Pronounced orbital-selective electron-electron correlation and electron-phonon coupling in V2Se2O, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04657 (2025)

    2025

  29. [36]

    L. Chen, J. Yue, J. Cheng, J. Bai, Z. Zhang, X. Ma, F. Hong, G. Chen, J.-T. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., Compression-induced magnetic obstructed atomic insulator and spin singlet state in antiferromagnetic KV2Se2O, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06712 (2025)

    2025

  30. [37]

    C.-C. Liu, J. Li, J.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Lu, H.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Physical properties and first-principles calculations of an altermagnet candidate Cs1−δV2Te2O, Phys. Rev. B112, 224439 (2025)

    2025

  31. [38]

    Y. Sun, Y. Huang, J. Cheng, S. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Luo, X. Ma, W. Yang, J. Yang, D. Chen, K. Sun, M. Gutmann, S. C. Capelli, F. Shen, J. Hao, L. He, G. Chen, and S. Li, Antifer- romagnetic structure of KV 2Se2O: A neutron diffraction study, Phys. Rev. B112, 184416 (2025)

    2025

  32. [39]

    G. Yang, R. Chen, C. Liu, J. Li, Z. Pan, L. Deng, N. Zheng, Y. Tang, H. Zheng, W. Zhu,et al., Observation of hidden altermagnetism in Cs 1−δV2Te2O, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00972 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Q. Hu, X. Cheng, Q. Duan, Y. Hu, B. Jiang, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, M. Pan, L. Deng, C. Liu, et al., Observation of spin-valley locked nodal lines in a quasi-2D altermagnet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02883 (2026)

    2026

  34. [41]

    J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun,d-wave flat Fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256702 (2025). 16

    2025

  35. [42]

    Li, J.-X

    C. Li, J.-X. Hou, S.-L. Zhu, H. Zheng, Y. Song, Y. Liu, S.-B. Zhang, and L.-H. Hu, Alter- magnetic even-odd effects in CsV2Te2O Josephson junctions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14485 (2026)

    2026

  36. [43]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Pincelli, C. Jozwiak, T. Kondo, R. Ernstorfer, T. Sato, and S. Zhou, Angle- resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Prim.2, 54 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    J. Liu, X. Ma, X. Zhang, W. Jing, Z. Liu, and D. Shen, Symmetry-driven spin splitting in altermagnets: An angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy perspective, Nano Converg.13, 6 (2026)

    2026

  38. [45]

    Bode, Spin-polarized scanning tunnelling microscopy, Rep

    M. Bode, Spin-polarized scanning tunnelling microscopy, Rep. Prog. Phys.66, 523 (2003)

    2003

  39. [46]

    Wiesendanger, Spin mapping at the nanoscale and atomic scale, Rev

    R. Wiesendanger, Spin mapping at the nanoscale and atomic scale, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1495 (2009)

    2009

  40. [47]

    Dzero, K

    M. Dzero, K. Sun, V. Galitski, and P. Coleman, Topological Kondo insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 106408 (2010)

    2010

  41. [48]

    Aishwarya, Z

    A. Aishwarya, Z. Cai, A. Raghavan, M. Romanelli, X. Wang, X. Li, G. Gu, M. Hirsbrunner, T. Hughes, F. Liu,et al., Spin-selective tunneling from nanowires of the candidate topological Kondo insulator SmB 6, Science377, 1218 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    inverse magnetic breakdown

    X. Yan, Z. Song, J. Song, Z. Fang, H. Weng, and Q. Wu, Magnetic symmetry breaking driven “inverse magnetic breakdown” in a d-wave altermagnet KV 2Se2O, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 257011 (2026)

    2026

  43. [51]

    J. Bai, B. Ruan, Q. Dong, L. Zhang, Q. Liu, J. Cheng, P. Liu, C. Li, Y. Sun, Y. Huang, Z. Ren, and G. Chen, Absence of long-range order in the vanadium oxychalcogenide KV2Se2O with nontrivial band topology, Phys. Rev. B110, 165151 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Zhuang, J

    H. Zhuang, J. Bai, J. Cheng, X. Li, Y. Meng, L. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Shen, Y. Wang, G. Chen, and R. Yu, Charge transfer caused anomalies of physical properties of KV 2Se2O, Europhys. Lett.150, 36003 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Y. Xu, H. Zhang, M. Feng, and F. Tian, Electronic structure, magnetic transition, and Fermi surface instability of the room-temperature altermagnet KV 2Se2O, Phys. Rev. B112, 125141 (2025). 17

    2025

  46. [54]

    B. Chen, F. Fei, D. Zhang, B. Zhang, W. Liu, S. Zhang, P. Wang, B. Wei, Y. Zhang, Z. Zuo, et al., Intrinsic magnetic topological insulator phases in the Sb doped MnBi 2Te4 bulks and thin flakes, Nat. Commun.10, 4469 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Zhang, R

    S. Zhang, R. Wang, X. Wang, B. Wei, B. Chen, H. Wang, G. Shi, F. Wang, B. Jia, Y. Ouyang, et al., Experimental observation of the gate-controlled reversal of the anomalous Hall effect in the intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4 device, Nano Lett.20, 709 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Ovchinnikov, X

    D. Ovchinnikov, X. Huang, Z. Lin, Z. Fei, J. Cai, T. Song, M. He, Q. Jiang, C. Wang, H. Li,et al., Intertwined topological and magnetic orders in atomically thin chern insulator MnBi2Te4, Nano Lett.21, 2544 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Gao, Y.-F

    A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, C. Hu, J.-X. Qiu, C. Tzschaschel, B. Ghosh, S.-C. Ho, D. B´ erub´ e, R. Chen, H. Sun,et al., Layer Hall effect in a 2D topological axion antiferromagnet, Nature595, 521 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    S. Yang, X. Xu, Y. Zhu, R. Niu, C. Xu, Y. Peng, X. Cheng, X. Jia, Y. Huang, X. Xu, J. Lu, and Y. Ye, Odd-even layer-number effect and layer-dependent magnetic phase diagrams in MnBi2Te4, Phys. Rev. X11, 011003 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Zhao, L.-J

    Y.-F. Zhao, L.-J. Zhou, F. Wang, G. Wang, T. Song, D. Ovchinnikov, H. Yi, R. Mei, K. Wang, M. H. Chan,et al., Even–odd layer-dependent anomalous Hall effect in topological magnet MnBi2Te4 thin films, Nano Lett.21, 7691 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Z. Wang, S. Yu, X. Cheng, X. Xiao, W. Ma, F. Quan, H. Song, K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, W. Liu, P. Yadav, X. Shi, Z. Wang, Q. Niu, Y. Gao, B. Xiang, J. Liu, Z. Wang, and X. Chen, Atomic-scale spin sensing of a 2Dd-wave altermagnet via helical tunneling, arXiv preprint arXiv:251...

    2025

  53. [61]

    D. Fu, L. Yang, K. Xiao, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, Q.-K. Xue, and W. Li, Atomic-scale visualization of d-wave altermagnetism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24114 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.