Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 57 references

If FCC-ee sees no dilepton-plus-missing-energy excess at 240 GeV, the data set 95% CL exclusion limits on vector-like lepton mass and Yukawa coupling in a lepton-portal scalar dark-matter model.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 11:32 UTC pith:PIKVD63G

load-bearing objection Abstract-only hep-ex sensitivity claim; the cached full text is the wrong paper, so we cannot audit the limits. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.04023 v3 pith:PIKVD63G submitted 2026-04-05 hep-ex

Searching for vector-like leptons decaying into an electron and missing transverse energy in e⁺e⁻ collisions with sqrt{s} = 240 GeV at the FCC-ee

S. Elgammal This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords vector-like leptonslepton portal dark matterFCC-eemissing transverse energyexclusion limitsYukawa couplingdilepton signature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper projects the sensitivity of the planned FCC-ee collider, running electron-positron collisions at 240 GeV with 10.8 ab^{-1}, to a concrete dark-matter benchmark. In that model a vector-like lepton is produced and decays into an ordinary electron plus a stable scalar dark-matter particle, leaving a clean signature of two leptons and missing transverse energy. Using only Monte Carlo samples, the analysis shows that the absence of any excess would carve out 95% confidence-level exclusion regions in the plane of vector-like-lepton mass versus the Yukawa coupling that controls production and decay. A reader interested in future colliders cares because these projected contours tell theorists and detector designers, before construction, how much of the lepton-portal parameter space the machine can actually test.

Core claim

Monte Carlo simulation of the dilepton plus missing-transverse-energy final state at FCC-ee (√s = 240 GeV, 10.8 ab^{-1}) demonstrates that non-observation of new physics would establish 95% confidence-level exclusion limits on the mass of the vector-like lepton and the Yukawa coupling of the lepton-portal scalar dark-matter benchmark.

What carries the argument

Monte Carlo generation of the lepton-portal benchmark in which a vector-like lepton decays to an electron plus an invisible scalar, producing the missing-transverse-energy plus dilepton signature that is counted to set the exclusion contours.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo samples and the assumed detector response for a collider that does not yet exist correctly predict signal efficiency, background rates and systematics at the level needed for trustworthy 95% CL contours.

What would settle it

A full detector simulation of the planned FCC-ee apparatus that shows the dilepton-plus-MET selection efficiency is substantially lower, or the dominant Standard-Model backgrounds substantially higher, than the paper’s Monte Carlo assumes, moving the exclusion contours by a large factor.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Projected 95% CL contours become available in the vector-like-lepton mass versus Yukawa plane for the FCC-ee 240 GeV run.
  • The luminosity and selection efficiency required to cover interesting regions of the lepton-portal model are quantified before the machine is built.
  • Portions of scalar dark-matter models that communicate with the Standard Model through vector-like leptons would be ruled out or tightly constrained if the projected limits are realized.
  • The same final-state analysis can be re-used for related portals once real detector performance is known.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Re-running the identical selection with a frozen, full GEANT-level FCC-ee detector model would reveal how much the projected limits degrade under realistic reconstruction and pile-up.
  • A direct comparison with HL-LHC projections for the same model would show whether FCC-ee supplies complementary low-mass reach or is merely redundant.
  • Because production rates fall with the square of the Yukawa coupling, the limits also set a practical lower bound on how weakly the portal can couple while remaining visible at this energy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. From the supplied abstract, the manuscript claims a projected search for vector-like leptons in a lepton-portal scalar dark-matter benchmark at the FCC-ee (√s = 240 GeV, 10.8 ab⁻¹). Signal production is via vector-like leptons that yield a scalar DM particle, with the experimental signature of missing transverse energy plus dilepton events. In the absence of a discovery, the analysis is said to set 95% CL exclusion limits on the vector-like lepton mass and the Yukawa coupling, based on Monte Carlo samples. No cut-flow, background composition, detector simulation details, systematic treatment, statistical procedure, or numerical limit contours appear in the material available for review.

Significance. Projected FCC-ee sensitivity studies for vector-like leptons and lepton-portal dark matter are of genuine interest for the future-collider physics case. If the (unseen) analysis is technically sound—with realistic efficiencies, backgrounds, and systematics—the claimed 95% CL contours would be a useful benchmark contribution. On the present evidence, however, significance cannot be assessed beyond the abstract-level claim, because the full technical content required to judge soundness is not available.

major comments (2)
  1. The CACHEABLE PAPER SOURCE CONTEXT provided for review is an unrelated discrete-geometry manuscript (arXiv:2604.04024, “A note on piercing discrete rectangles”), not the hep-ex analysis described by the title and abstract (arXiv:2604.04023). Consequently no selection cuts, efficiency tables, background model, systematic uncertainties, statistical method, or exclusion contours can be inspected. The central claim—95% CL limits on VLL mass and Yukawa coupling—cannot be verified or falsified from the supplied text.
  2. Abstract only: the sole empirical premise of the claimed limits is that Monte Carlo samples plus (unstated) FCC-ee detector and background modeling correctly capture signal efficiency, background rates, and systematics. Without the full analysis description this premise is uncheckable; any substantial mismatch would move the contours. This is load-bearing for the paper’s only quantitative result.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract wording (“delves into”, “byproduct”) is informal for a journal-style experimental projection; tighten once the correct manuscript is supplied.
  2. The abstract does not state the statistical framework (e.g. CL_s, asymptotic formulae) or whether systematics are profiled; these should appear in the methods section of the correct full text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity can be assessed: the supplied full text is an unrelated combinatorics paper, not the claimed FCC-ee analysis.

full rationale

The CACHEABLE PAPER SOURCE CONTEXT contains only arXiv:2604.04024 ("A note on piercing discrete rectangles"), a pure mathematics paper on discrete Helly-type and (p,q) theorems for axis-parallel boxes. It has no Monte Carlo samples, no FCC-ee detector simulation, no dilepton+MET selection, no Yukawa coupling, and no exclusion contours. Consequently there is no derivation chain, no fitted parameter, and no self-citation that can be inspected for circularity with respect to the claimed hep-ex result. Under the hard rule that circularity may be claimed only when a specific reduction can be quoted from the paper, the only honest finding is score 0 with empty steps. The abstract alone describes a standard projected-limit study; nothing in it exhibits a self-definitional or fitted-input tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only audit. The claim rests on standard HEP simulation practice plus design parameters of FCC-ee and an unspecified lepton-portal benchmark. No free parameters can be fitted from data because no real data exist; luminosity and energy are design inputs. Entities (VLL, scalar DM) are taken from the model literature, not invented here. Full-text gaps prevent listing every simulation assumption.

free parameters (3)
  • integrated luminosity = 10.8 ab^{-1}
    Fixed at the design value 10.8 ab⁻¹; the exclusion reach scales directly with this choice.
  • center-of-mass energy = 240 GeV
    Fixed at the planned FCC-ee Higgs-factory energy √s = 240 GeV; kinematics and production rates depend on it.
  • benchmark model parameters (masses, Yukawa)
    Abstract says a 'specific benchmark scenario' is explored; the scanned or fixed values of VLL mass and Yukawa are free choices that define the claimed contours.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo event generation plus detector simulation faithfully represent FCC-ee signal efficiency and Standard Model backgrounds for the MET + dilepton final state.
    Sole empirical basis of the projected 95% CL limits; stated as 'utilizing Monte Carlo simulated samples' in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Lepton-portal dark matter with a scalar DM particle produced via a vector-like lepton is a valid BSM scenario whose production and decay are correctly modeled.
    Defines the signal process whose non-observation yields the exclusion limits.
  • standard math Standard frequentist or CL_s-style construction of 95% confidence level exclusion contours applies to the simulated samples.
    Implicit in the claim that 95% CL limits are established; method not specified in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 7256 in / 2563 out tokens · 34583 ms · 2026-07-13T11:32:16.616680+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This analysis delves into the lepton portal dark matter by utilizing Monte Carlo simulated samples from electron-positron collisions at the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), operating at a center of mass energy of 240 GeV and an integrated luminosity of 10.8 ab$^{-1}$. The study explores a specific benchmark scenario in which dark matter is represented as a scalar particle produced as a byproduct of a vector-like lepton. The key signal signature features missing transverse energy alongside dilepton events. Should new physics not be detected, this study establishes 95\% confidence level exclusion limits on the mass of the vector-like leptons and the Yukawa coupling.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 blue [arXiv:1502.01589] [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A 641, A6 (2020) blue arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    2015, no

    Lage, C and Farrar, G, The bullet cluster is not a cosmological anomaly, JCAP, vol. 2015, no. 2, 038. blue https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/038

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/038 2015

  4. [4]

    Bertone, Gianfranco and Hooper, Dan and Si, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279-390 blue [arXiv:hep-ph/0404175] [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    CMS Collaboration, Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment - 2024, DOI: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13778

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Haley Jo seph, Searches for Dark Matter with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2846383

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    and Turner, Michael S., On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable, weakly interacting massive particles, Phys

    Scherrer, Robert J. and Turner, Michael S., On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable, weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1585 blue [iNSPIRE-HEP]

    1986

  8. [8]

    Chang, R

    S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, ``Leptophilic Effective WIMPs,'' Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.1, 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Bai and J

    Y. Bai and J. Berger, ``Lepton Portal Dark Matter,'' JHEP 08 (2014), 153 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)153 [arXiv:1402.6696 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)153 2014

  10. [10]

    Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry

    S. P. Martin, “Extra vectorlike matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy supersymmetry”, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035004, blue doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.035004, arXiv:0910.2732

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.035004 2010

  11. [11]

    Minimal vectorlike model in supersymmetric unification

    S. Zheng, “Minimal vectorlike model in supersymmetric unification”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 273, blue doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7843-8, arXiv:1904.1014

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7843-8 2020

  12. [12]

    Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric models with vectorlike matters

    M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and N. Yokozaki, “Higgs mass and muon anomalous magnetic moment in supersymmetric models with vectorlike matters”, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 075017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.075017, arXiv:1108.3071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.075017 2011

  13. [14]

    E6 inspired supersymmetric models with exact custodial symmetry

    R. Nevzorov, “E6 inspired supersymmetric models with exact custodial symmetry”, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015029, blue doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.015029, arXiv:1205.5967

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.015029 2013

  14. [15]

    Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup

    I. Dorˇsner, S. Fajfer, and I. Musta´c, “Light vector-like fermions in a minimal SU(5) setup”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115004, blue doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115004,arXiv:1401.6870

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.115004 2014

  15. [16]

    Searching for signatures of E6

    A. Joglekar and J. L. Rosner, “Searching for signatures of E6”, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017)015026, blue doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015026, arXiv:1607.06900

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.015026 2017

  16. [17]

    Bounds on the fermion-bulk masses in models with universal extra dimensions

    G.-Y. Huang, K. Kong, and S. C. Park, “Bounds on the fermion-bulk masses in models with universal extra dimensions”, JHEP 06 (2012) 099, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)099, arXiv:1204.0522

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2012)099 2012

  17. [18]

    A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete symmetry from Split-UED

    K. Kong, S. C. Park, and T. G. Rizzo, “A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete symmetry from Split-UED”, JHEP 07 (2010) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)059, arXiv:1004.4635

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2010)059 2010

  18. [19]

    Dark matter and vectorlike leptons from gauged lepton number

    P. Schwaller, T. M. P. Tait, and R. Vega-Morales, “Dark matter and vectorlike leptons from gauged lepton number”, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.035001, arXiv:1305.1108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.035001 2013

  19. [20]

    Vectorlike leptons as the tip of the dark matter iceberg

    J. Halverson, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce, “Vectorlike leptons as the tip of the dark matter iceberg”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.015002, arXiv:1403.1592

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.015002 2014

  20. [21]

    Dark matter and collider studies in the left-right symmetric model with vectorlike leptons

    S. Bahrami et al., “Dark matter and collider studies in the left-right symmetric model with vectorlike leptons”, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.095024, arXiv:1612.06334

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.095024 2017

  21. [22]

    Mini review on vector-like leptonic dark matter, neutrino mass, and collider signatures

    S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, N. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, “Mini review on vector-like leptonic dark matter, neutrino mass, and collider signatures”, Front. Phys. 7 (2019) 80, doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00080, arXiv:1812.06505

    doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00080 2019

  22. [23]

    Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology

    A. Falkowski, D. M. Straub, and A. Vicente, “Vector-like leptons: Higgs decays and collider phenomenology”, JHEP 05 (2014) 092, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)092, arXiv:1312.5329

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)092 2014

  23. [24]

    A Common Origin for Neutrino Anarchy and Charged Hierarchies

    K. Agashe, T. Okui, and R. Sundrum, “Common origin for neutrino anarchy and charged hierarchies”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.101801, arXiv:0810.1277

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.101801 2009

  24. [25]

    Leptons in Composite MFV

    M. Redi, “Leptons in composite MFV”, JHEP 09 (2013) 060, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)060, arXiv:1306.1525

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)060 2013

  25. [26]

    Explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays

    Radovan Dermisek, Aditi Raval, "Explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays", Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.013017, arXiv:1305.3522

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.013017 2013

  26. [27]

    $g_\mu-2$ from Vector-Like Leptons in Warped Space

    Eugenio Megias, Mariano Quiros, and Lindber Salas, " g_ - 2 from vector-like leptons in warped space", JHEP 05 (2017) 016, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)016, arXiv:1701.05072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)016 2017

  27. [28]

    Complete Vector-like Fourth Family and new $\mathrm{U(1)^\prime}$ for Muon Anomalies

    J. Kawamura, S. Raby, and A. Trautner, “Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1) for muon anomalies”, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055030, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055030, arXiv:1906.11297

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.055030 2019

  28. [29]

    Model building from asymptotic safety with Higgs and flavor portals

    G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D. F. Litim, and T. Steudtner, “Model building from asymptotic safety with Higgs and flavor portals”, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 095023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.095023, arXiv:2008.08606

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.095023 2020

  29. [30]

    Junichiro Kawamura, Shohei Okawa, Yuji Omura, Current status and muon g-2 explanation of lepton portal dark matter, JHEP 08 (2020) 042

    2020

  30. [31]

    Kawamura, S

    J. Kawamura, S. Okawa and Y. Omura, ``W boson mass and muon g-2 in a lepton portal dark matter model,'' Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.1, 015005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.015005 [arXiv:2204.07022 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.015005 2022

  31. [32]

    Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.052003, arXiv:1905.10853

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.052003 2019

  32. [33]

    Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 112007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.112007, arXiv:2202.08676

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.112007 2022

  33. [34]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for pair-produced vector-like leptons in final states with third-generation leptons and at least three b quark jets in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 137713, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137713, arXiv:2208.09700

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137713 2023

  34. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for electroweak production of vector-like leptons in multiple -lepton and b -jets final states in pp collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 1335

    2025

  35. [36]

    Kawamura and S

    J. Kawamura and S. Shin, Current status on pair-produced muon-philic vectorlike leptons in multilepton channels at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2023), 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)025 [arXiv:2308.07814 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)025 2023

  36. [37]

    ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s =13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [38]

    Agapov et

    I. Agapov et. al., Future Circular Lepton Collider FCC-ee: Overview and Status. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.08310

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08310

  38. [39]

    Aicheler et.al., The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan, DOI: https://e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYRM/issue/view/68

    M. Aicheler et.al., The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan, DOI: https://e-publishing.cern.ch/index.php/CYRM/issue/view/68

  39. [40]

    Alipour-Fard, N

    S. Alipour-Fard, N. Craig, M. Jiang and S. Koren, Long Live the Higgs Factory: Higgs Decays to Long-Lived Particles at Future Lepton Colliders, Chin. Phys. C 43 (2019) 053101 [1812.05588]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [41]

    J. Brau, Y. Okada, N.Walker, blue arXiv:0712.1950 [physics.acc-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1950

  41. [42]

    Djouadi et al, blue arXiv:0709.1893 [hep-ph]

    A. Djouadi et al, blue arXiv:0709.1893 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    Phinney, N

    N. Phinney, N. Toge, N. Walker, blue arXiv:0712.2361 [physics.acc-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [44]

    Behnke et al., ArXiv e-prints (2007) blue arXiv:0712.2356 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Behnke et al., ArXiv e-prints (2007) blue arXiv:0712.2356 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [45]

    Kawamura and S

    J. Kawamura and S. Raby, ``W mass in a model with vectorlike leptons and U(1)','' Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.3, 035009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.035009 [arXiv:2205.10480 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.035009 2022

  45. [46]

    Aaltonen et al

    T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF], ``High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector,'' Science 376 (2022) no.6589, 170-176 doi:10.1126/science.abk1781

    doi:10.1126/science.abk1781 2022

  46. [47]

    CMS collaboration, High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC, 2024, arXiv:2412.13872 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [48]

    ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W-boson mass and width with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 1309

    2024

  48. [49]

    WHIZARD—simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC

    Wolfgang Kilian, Thorsten Ohl, and Jurgen Reuter. WHIZARD—simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC. The European Physical Journal C, 71(9), Sep 2011

    2011

  49. [50]

    T. Ohl. O'Mega & WHIZARD: Monte Carlo event generator generation for future colliders. DOI:10.1063/1.1394396

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1394396

  50. [51]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual [ blue arXiv:hep-ph/0603175 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    arXiv:2502.21223 [physics.ins-det]

    The IDEA detector concept for FCC-ee (2025). arXiv:2502.21223 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆıtre, A. Mertens, M.Selvaggi, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic col- lider experiment, JHEP 1402 (2014)

    2014

  53. [54]

    Ferro, Cristina, B-tagging in CMS, EPJ Web of Conferences 28 12055 (2012), DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20122812055

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/20122812055 2012

  54. [55]

    W. S. Emam and S. A. Moussa, Search for Stueckel-berg Z' at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 441–447 (2009)

    2009

  55. [56]

    Cowan et al., Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur

    G. Cowan et al., Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011), p. 1554, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0, arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  56. [57]

    A. L. Read, Presentation of search results: the CLs technique, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part.Phys. 28 (2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002

  57. [58]

    T. Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 434, Issues 2–3, 1999, Pages 435-443, ISSN 0168-9002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2

    doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999