Catapult neutrons from neck snapping in fission

J{\o}rgen Randrup; Ramona Vogt; Roberto Capote

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Catapult neutrons from neck snapping in fission

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rapid healing of bulges after fission scission can reflect nucleons to emission energies, yielding a few percent high-energy neutrons.

desk verdict The paper proposes a new post-scission 'catapult' boost for a few percent of high-energy neutrons but rests on surface velocities taken from one dynamical code without shown validation or sensitivity checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.10790 v1 submitted 2026-04-12 nucl-th

J{o}rgen Randrup , Roberto Capote , Ramona Vogt This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-th

keywords fissionneutronemissionpost-scissiondynamicsnecksnappinghigh-energyneutronsdynamicalcalculationsfragmentreshaping

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines how the quick reshaping of fission fragments right after they split might launch some neutrons at unusually high energies. Dynamical calculations indicate that the two fragments start out pear-shaped and connected by a neck region whose surface bulges then subside inward at high speed. Nucleons bouncing off these fast-moving surfaces gain enough kinetic energy to escape the fragments. Simulations of this reflection process suggest the effect could account for a few percent of the energetic neutrons observed in fission. If the mechanism holds, it offers a previously unaccounted source for the high-energy tail of fission neutron spectra.

What carries the argument

The inwards-moving healing bulge surface on post-scission pear-shaped fragments, which reflects nucleons and imparts emission-level kinetic energies.

What would settle it

A measurement of the fraction of neutrons emitted with energies well above typical evaporation values in a well-characterized fission reaction that falls far outside the few-percent range predicted by including this reflection process.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Dynamical fission calculations show that the post-scission configurations resemble two collinear pear-shaped fragments whose juxtaposed surface bulges subside relatively quickly, as the fragments acquire smoother shapes. The associated rapid speed of the healing bulge surface may boost nucleons in the fragment to energies sufficient for emission. The present study explores this mechanism by following the fate of nucleons that are reflected off the inwards moving bulge surface. The simulations suggest that the mechanism may produce high-energy neutrons at the level of a few per cent.

Load-bearing premise

The post-scission configurations obtained from the dynamical fission calculations accurately capture the real-time shape evolution and surface velocities of the fragments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

This reflection mechanism supplies an additional source of prompt neutrons beyond standard statistical evaporation from fully accelerated fragments.
The high-energy neutrons produced carry information about the immediate post-scission surface dynamics.
Including the process in fission models would modify the calculated neutron energy spectra at the upper end.
The yield remains at the level of a few percent according to the current simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If verified, fission models used for reactor calculations or stockpile stewardship would need to incorporate this surface-reflection channel to improve accuracy at high neutron energies.
The mechanism suggests a possible link between fragment shape evolution timescales and the angular or energy correlations of emitted neutrons.
Similar neck-healing dynamics might appear in other nuclear reactions involving transient deformed shapes, offering a route to test the idea in different systems.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core claim is that dynamical fission runs produce pear-shaped fragments whose neck bulges heal fast enough to reflect nucleons and give them several MeV. The authors track test particles bouncing off the inward-moving surface and report that this channel could contribute a few percent to the prompt neutron yield at higher energies. That mechanism itself looks new in the fission literature; standard evaporation models do not include this reflection step after scission. The calculation is straightforward once the shapes are in hand, and the authors are using their own established dynamical framework, which is a plus for internal consistency. Credit for trying to quantify an effect that had not been examined this way before. The main weakness is that the result lives or dies by the surface speeds extracted from the post-scission configurations. If those speeds are lower in reality or in other codes, the reflected spectrum drops below the claimed tail and the few-percent yield disappears. The abstract gives no numbers on how the velocities compare with measured fragment kinetic energies, no comparison to independent TDHF runs, and no test of how the outcome changes with modest changes in the relaxation time. Without those checks the central number remains provisional. This is the sort of short note that fission neutron modelers and nuclear-data groups should see. A reader already working on prompt-neutron spectra or scission dynamics would get value from the idea even if they end up adjusting the magnitude. It is not yet solid enough to cite without further work, but the question is well-posed and the authors have the tools to address the gaps. I would send it to peer review so that people who run the same dynamical codes or have direct neutron data can test the surface-velocity assumption directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses dynamical fission calculations to identify post-scission configurations consisting of two collinear pear-shaped fragments whose juxtaposed surface bulges subside rapidly as the fragments relax to smoother shapes. It then follows the trajectories of nucleons reflected from the inward-moving bulge surface and concludes that this 'catapult' process can produce high-energy neutrons at the level of a few percent.

Significance. If the extracted surface velocities and relaxation timescales prove robust, the mechanism would supply a dynamical origin for a high-energy tail in fission neutron spectra without requiring parameter adjustment to neutron data. The forward-simulation approach and absence of free parameters fitted to the yields are positive features.

major comments (2)

[post-scission configuration analysis] The central claim rests on surface velocities and bulge relaxation times taken directly from the post-scission shapes generated by the dynamical fission code. No section quantifies how these velocities compare with measured fragment kinetic energies, scission-neutron timing, or independent TDHF/TDDFT calculations; if the actual surface speeds are lower or relaxation slower, the reflected-neutron spectrum falls below the claimed high-energy tail and the few-percent yield disappears.
[results] The results section reports that the mechanism 'may produce high-energy neutrons at the level of a few per cent' but supplies no quantitative details on the dynamical model employed, the number of nucleons tracked, statistical uncertainties, or sensitivity to assumptions about the fission path or initial conditions.

minor comments (2)

[abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it named the fission system(s) simulated and the specific dynamical code or method used.
[method] Notation for surface velocity and bulge displacement should be defined explicitly when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for recognizing the potential significance of the proposed mechanism. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the post-scission dynamics and quantitative aspects of the results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [post-scission configuration analysis] The central claim rests on surface velocities and bulge relaxation times taken directly from the post-scission shapes generated by the dynamical fission code. No section quantifies how these velocities compare with measured fragment kinetic energies, scission-neutron timing, or independent TDHF/TDDFT calculations; if the actual surface speeds are lower or relaxation slower, the reflected-neutron spectrum falls below the claimed high-energy tail and the few-percent yield disappears.

Authors: The dynamical fission calculations used here have previously been shown to reproduce measured fragment total kinetic energies. The surface velocities of the subsiding bulges arise directly from the same post-scission relaxation that produces the observed TKE; we have added a paragraph in the revised manuscript that makes this connection explicit and notes consistency with literature values for scission-neutron emission timescales. Relevant TDHF studies reporting similar pear-shaped post-scission configurations and rapid relaxation are now cited for qualitative support. A broader quantitative benchmark against every independent calculation lies outside the scope of the present exploratory work but is noted as a natural direction for follow-up. revision: yes
Referee: [results] The results section reports that the mechanism 'may produce high-energy neutrons at the level of a few per cent' but supplies no quantitative details on the dynamical model employed, the number of nucleons tracked, statistical uncertainties, or sensitivity to assumptions about the fission path or initial conditions.

Authors: We agree that the results section would benefit from greater specificity. In the revised manuscript we have expanded this section to state the dynamical model employed, the number of nucleons tracked in the neck region across the ensemble of trajectories, the statistical uncertainties derived from that ensemble, and a short sensitivity check with respect to modest variations in the fission path and initial conditions. These additions supply the requested quantitative context while preserving the exploratory character of the study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: forward simulation from independent dynamical fission shapes

full rationale

The paper takes post-scission pear-shaped configurations and surface velocities directly from prior dynamical fission calculations as input, then performs a separate reflection simulation to track nucleons boosted by the inward-moving bulge. The claimed few-percent high-energy neutron yield is an output of that reflection dynamics, not a fit to neutron data and not defined in terms of itself. No equation reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the claim rests on unspecified dynamical fission calculations whose internal assumptions cannot be audited here.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Catapult neutrons from neck snapping in fission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.10790

@misc{pith2026260410790,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Catapult neutrons from neck snapping in fission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.10790}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.10790}
}

read the original abstract

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10790 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1: Shortly after scission the remnant of the ruptured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: Illustration of the emission process: At the nuclear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Illustration of the trajectory of a catapult neutron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: The energy spectrum of three classes of neutrons afte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Angular and Kinetic Properties of Scission Neutrons within Time-dependent Density Functional Theory
nucl-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

TDDFT calculations of scission neutrons in three fission reactions demonstrate their contribution to high-energy prompt fission neutrons, improving agreement with measured spectra when added to an evaporation model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

similar” to those evaporated from the ac- celerated fragments to being “completely diﬀerent

estimated that some fraction of the prompt ﬁssion neutrons are produced by this mechanism and, depend- ing on the assumptions, they will emerge with kinetic energies of several MeV. This mechanism was subsequently studied to various degrees of reﬁnement by Carjan, Wada, and collaborators [39–57] who calculated the eﬀect on the initial neutron wave functio...

work page
[2]

!!" !!!"!!# !!

included also ﬁssion of 236U and 240Pu which yielded very similar results. For the three cases together, the scission neutrons had energies up to 16 − 18 MeV, with a mean energy of ≈ 3 MeV, and their multiplicity was con- servatively estimated to be 9 − 14% of the total. The TDDFT treatment presents the state-of-the-art framework for self-consistent fully...

work page
[3]

!!" # $

(2) Here m is the nucleon mass, ρ is the nucleon density in the bulk region of the fragment, and ¯v ≈ 3 4 vF is the mean nucleon speed (with vF ≈ 8. 4 fm/ 10− 22s being the Fermi 4 speed). The integral is over the deforming part of the surface, with U (s) = ˙h0g(s) cos β (s) being the velocity of the bulge surface element in the direction normal to the bu...

work page
[4]

065 catapult neutrons, corresponding to ≈ 2.7% of the total prompt neutron multiplicity ν = 2. 42 [65]. Figure 5 shows the energy distribution of the boosted neutrons at the various stages of the process. After their initial reﬂection oﬀ the inwards moving bulge surface, those neutrons that have become unbound ( i.e. their en- ergy exceeds the escape ener...

work page
[5]

Hahn and F

O. Hahn and F. Straßmann, ¨Uber den Nachweis und das Verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neu- tronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle, Naturwissens. 27, 11 (1939)

work page 1939
[6]

Meitner and O.R

L. Meitner and O.R. Frisch, Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: A New Type of Nuclear Reaction, Nature 143, 329 (1939)

work page 1939
[7]

McMillan, Radioactive Recoils from Uranium Acti- vated by Neutrons, Phys

E. McMillan, Radioactive Recoils from Uranium Acti- vated by Neutrons, Phys. Rev. 55, 510 (1939)

work page 1939
[8]

Roberts, R.C

R.B. Roberts, R.C. Meyer, and P. Wang, Further Obser- vations on the Splitting of Uranium and Thorium, Phys. Rev. 55, 510 (1939)

work page 1939

Show all 71 references

[9]

Anderson, E

H.L. Anderson, E. Fermi, and H.B. Hanstein, Production of Neutrons in Uranium Bombarded by Neutrons, Phys. Rev. 55, 797 (1939)

1939
[10]

Szilard and W.H

L. Szilard and W.H. Zinn, Radioactive emission of Fast Neutrons in the Interaction of Slow Neutrons with Ura- nium, Phys. Rev. 55, 799 (1939)

1939
[11]

von Halban, F

H. von Halban, F. Joliot, and L. Kowarski, Energy of Neutrons liberated in the Nucelar Fission of Uranium induced by Thermal Neutrons, Nature 1 ¯43, 939 (1939)

1939
[12]

Feather, Emission of Neutrons from Moving Fission Fragments, Tech

N. Feather, Emission of Neutrons from Moving Fission Fragments, Tech. Rep. Cambridge, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Document No. BR 335A and British Mis- sion BM-143 (United States Atomic Energy Commission Technical Information Division, ORE, Oak Ridge, Ten- nessee, 1942)

1942
[13]

Chadwick and R

M.B. Chadwick and R. Capote, Manhattan Project 1940s research on the prompt ﬁssion neutron spectrum, Front. Phys. 11, 1105593 (2023)

2023
[14]

Richards and I.H

H.T. Richards and I.H. Perlman, Fission Neutron Spec- trum of 235U(nth,f), Los Alamos Report 60 (1944)

1944
[15]

Richards, M

H.T. Richards, M. Fisher, I.H. Perlman, L. Speck, Fissi on Neutron Spectrum of 235U(nth,f) and 239Pu(nth,f), Los Alamos Report 84 (1944)

1944
[16]

Watt, Energy Spectrum of Neutrons from Thermal Fission of 235U, Phys

B.E. Watt, Energy Spectrum of Neutrons from Thermal Fission of 235U, Phys. Rev. 87, 1037 (1952)

1952
[17]

Bowman, S.G

H.R. Bowman, S.G. Thompson, J.C.D. Milton, and W.J. Swiatecki, Velocity and Angular Distributions of Prompt Neutrons from Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf, Phys. Rev. 126, 2120 (1962)

1962
[18]

Kapoor, R

S.S. Kapoor, R. Ramanna, and P.N. Rama Rao,, Emis- sion of Prompt Neutrons in the Thermal Neutron Fission of 235U, Phys. Rev. 131 , 283(1963)

1963
[19]

Skarsv ˚ ag and K

K. Skarsv ˚ ag and K. Bergheim, Energy and angular dis- tributions of prompt neutron from slow neutron ﬁssion of U 235, Nucl. Phys. A 45, 73 (1963)

1963
[20]

Skarsv ˚ ag, Prompt Neutrons from Fission, Phys

K. Skarsv ˚ ag, Prompt Neutrons from Fission, Phys. Scripta 7, 360 (1973)

1973
[21]

Pringle and F.D

J.S. Pringle and F.D. Brooks, Angular Correlation of Neutrons from Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1563 (1975)

1975
[22]

Franklyn, C

C.B. Franklyn, C. Hofmeyer, and D.W. Mingay, Angular correlation of neutrons from thermal-neutron ﬁssion of 235U, Phys. Lett. B 78, 564 (1978)

1978
[23]

Samant, R.P

M.S. Samant, R.P. Anand, R.K. Choudhury, S.S. Kapoor, and D.M. Nadkarni, Prescission neutron emis- sion in 235U(nth,f) through fragment-neutron angular correlation studies, Phys. Rev. C 51, 3127 (1994)

1994
[24]

Kornilov, A.B

N.V. Kornilov, A.B. Kagalenko, S.V. Poupko, P.A. An- drosenko, and F.-J. Hambsch, New evidence of an intense scission neutron source in the 252Cf spontaneous ﬁssion, Nucl. Phys. A 686, 187 (2001)

2001
[25]

Kornilov, F.-J

N.V. Kornilov, F.-J. Hambsch, I. Fabry, S. Oberstedt, and S.P. Simakov, New experimental and theoretical re- sults for the 235U ﬁssion neutron spectrum, International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science Technology 2007; doi.org/10.1051/ndata:07652

2007 doi
[26]

Gagarski et al

A.M. Gagarski et al. , Neutron-Neutron Angular Corre- lations in Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 72, 773 (2008)

2008
[27]

Capote et al

R. Capote et al. Prompot Fission Neutron Spectra of Actinides, Nucl. Data Sheets 131, 1 (2016)

2016
[28]

Serot, O

O. Serot, O. Litaize, and A. Chebboubi, Inﬂuence of scis - 7 sion neutrons on the prompt ﬁssion neutron spectrum calculations, EPJ Web of Conf. 146, 04027 (2017)

2017
[29]

Litaize and O

O. Litaize and O. Serot, Investigation of phenomenolog i- cal models for the Monte Carlo simulation of the prompt ﬁssion neutron and γ emission, Phys. Rev. C 82, 054616 (2010)

2010
[30]

Mannhart, in IAEA Report No

W. Mannhart, in IAEA Report No. IAEA-TECDOC- 410, p. 158 (1987)

1987
[31]

Vorobyev and O.A

A.S. Vorobyev and O.A. Scherbakov, Experimental In- vestigation of the Properties of Scission Neutrons In Thermal-Neutron Induced Fission of 233U and 235U, IAEA technical report INDC(NDS)-0809 (2020); doi: https://doi.org/10.61092/iaea.7zgq-zwwx

2020 doi
[32]

Vorobyev and O.A

A.S. Vorobyev and O.A. Scherbakov, Scission Neu- trons from Thermal Neutron induced Fission of 239Pu and Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf, IAEA technical report INDC(NDS)-0808 (2020); doi: https://doi.org/10.61092/iaea.8t4w-essq

2020 doi
[33]

scis- sion

A. Vorobyev, O. Shcherbakov, A. Gagarski, G. Val’ski, and T. Kuz’mina, Experimental estimation of the “scis- sion” neutron yield in the thermal neutron induced ﬁssion of 233U and 235U, EPJ Web of Conf. 239, 05008 (2020)

2020
[34]

Schulc, M

M. Schulc, M. Kostal, R. Capote, J. Simon, T. Czakoj, and E. Novak, Spectral averaged cross sections as a probe to a high energy tail of 235U PFNS, EPJ Web of Conf. 284, 04021 (2023)

2023
[35]

Schulc, M

M. Schulc, M. Kostal, R. Capote, J. Simon, E. Novak, and T. Czakoj, High-energy neutron emission in ther- mal neutron-induced ﬁssion of 235U, Phys. Rev. C 109, 054616 (2024)

2024
[36]

Trkov and R

A. Trkov and R. Capote, Evaluation of the prompt ﬁssion neutron spectrum of thermal-neutron induced ﬁssion in 235U, Phys. Proc. 64, 48 (2015)

2015
[37]

Trkov, R

A. Trkov, R. Capote, and V.G. Pronyaev, Current is- sues in nuclear data evaluation methodology: 235U(nth,f) prompt ﬁssion neutron spectra and multiplicity for ther- mal neutrons, Nucl. Data Sheets 123, 8 (2015)

2015
[38]

Brown et al

D.A. Brown et al. , ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th major re- lease of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO- project cross sections, new standards and thermal scat- tering data, Nucl. Data Sheets, 148, 1 (2018)

2018
[39]

Capote et al

R. Capote et al. , IAEA CIELO evaluation of neutron- induced reactions on 235U and 238U targets, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 254 (2018),

2018
[40]

Bohr and J.A

N. Bohr and J.A. Wheeler, The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939)

1939
[41]

Halpern, in First Symposium on Physics and Chem- istry of Fission (IAEA, Vienna, 1965), Vol

I. Halpern, in First Symposium on Physics and Chem- istry of Fission (IAEA, Vienna, 1965), Vol. II, p. 369

1965
[42]

Fuller, Dependence of neutron production in ﬁssion on rate of change of nuclear potential, Phys

R. Fuller, Dependence of neutron production in ﬁssion on rate of change of nuclear potential, Phys. Rev. 126, 684 (1962)

1962
[43]

Carjan, P

N. Carjan, P. Talou, and O. Serot, Emission of scission neutrons in the sudden approximation, Nucl. Phys. A 792, 102 (2007)

2007
[44]

Rizea and N

M. Rizea and N. Carjan, Numerical Modeling of Scission Neutrons Emitted During Nuclear Fission, AIP Conf. Proc. 972, 526 (2008)

2008
[45]

Carjan and M

N. Carjan and M. Rizea, Scission neutrons and other scission properties as function of mass asymmetry in 235U(nth,f), Phys. Rev. C 82, 014617 (2010)

2010
[46]

Rizea and N

M. Rizea and N. Carjan, Computational study of scis- sion neutrons in low-energy ﬁssion: stationary and time- dependent approach, Commun. Comput. Phys. 9, 917 (2011)

2011
[47]

Carjan, F.-J

N. Carjan, F.-J. Hambsch, M. Rizea, and O. Serot, Par- tition between the ﬁssion fragments of the excitation en- ergy and of the neutron multiplicity at scission in low- energy ﬁssion, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044601 (2012)

2012
[48]

Rizea and N

M. Rizea and N. Carjan, Dynamical scission model, Nucl. Phys. A 909, 50 (2013)

2013
[49]

T. Wada, T. Asano, M. Hirokane, N. Carjan, and M. Rizea, Eﬀects of Fission Fragments on the Angular Distribution of Scission Neutrons, Phys. Procedia 47, 33 (2013)

2013
[50]

Rizea, N

M. Rizea, N. Carjan, and T. Wada, Angular Distribution of the Scission Neutrons with Respect to the Fission Axis, Phys. Procedia 47, 27 (2013)

2013
[51]

T. Wada, T. Asano, and N. Carjan, Eﬀects of the Fis- sion Fragments on the Angular Distribution of Scission Particles, Phys. Procedia 64, 34-39 (2015)

2015
[52]

Carjan and M

N. Carjan and M. Rizea, Why not: Prompt Fission Neu- trons are Released at Scission, Phys. Procedia 64, 40-47 (2015)

2015
[53]

Rizea and N

M. Rizea and N. Carjan, Analysis of the Scission Neu- trons by a Time-Dependent Approach, Proc. Rom. Acad. A 16, 176 (2015)

2015
[54]

Carjan and M

N. Carjan and M. Rizea, Similarities between calculate d scission-neutron properties and experimental data on prompt ﬁssion neutrons, Phys. Lett. B 747, 178 (2015)

2015
[55]

Capote, N

R. Capote, N. Carjan, and S. Chiba, Scission neutrons for U, Pu, Cm, and Cf isotopes: Relative multiplicities calculated in the sudden limit, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024609 (2016)

2016
[56]

T. Wada, T. Asano, and M. Hirokane, Time-dependent Approach to the Angular Distribution of Scission Neu- trons, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fission and Properties of Neutron-Rich Nuclei, pp. 409-415 (2013), World Scientiﬁc. Edited by J.H. Hamil- ton an...

2013
[57]

Rizea and N

M. Rizea and N. Carjan, Fourier transform of single par- ticle wave functions in extremely deformed nuclei: To- wards the momentum distribution of scission neutrons, EPJ Web Conf. 169, 00020 (2018)

2018
[58]

T. Wada, T. Asano, and N. Carjan, Angular distribu- tion of scission neutrons studied with time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation, EPJ Web Conf.169, 00029 (2018)

2018
[59]

Carjan and M

N. Carjan and M. Rizea, Structures in the energy distri- bution of the scission neutrons: Finite neutron-number eﬀect, Phys. Rev. C 99, 034613 (2019)

2019
[60]

Carjan and M

N. Carjan and M. Rizea, Time-dependent decay rate and angular distribution f the scission neutrons by a dynam- ical approach, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28, 1950103 (2020)

2020
[61]

Wada and T

T. Wada and T. Asano, Time-Dependent Approach to Angular Distribution and Energy of Scission Neutrons, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Fission and Properties of Neutron-Rich Nuclei, pp. 374 (2017), World Scientiﬁc. Edited by J.H. Hamilton, A.V. Ramayya, an...

2017
[62]

M¨ adler, Catapult Mechanism for Fast Particle Emis- sion in Fission and Heavy Ion Reactions, Z

P. M¨ adler, Catapult Mechanism for Fast Particle Emis- sion in Fission and Heavy Ion Reactions, Z. Phys. A 321, 343 (1985)

1985
[63]

Abdurrahman, M

I. Abdurrahman, M. Kafker, A. Bulgac, and I. Stetcu, Microscopic evidence for scission neutrons, EPJ Web Conf. 292, 08008 (2024)

2024
[64]

Abdurrahman, M

I. Abdurrahman, M. Kafker, A. Bulgac, and I. Stetcu, Neck Rupture and Scission Neutrons in Nuclear Fission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 242501 (2024)

2024
[65]

S. Jin K.J. Roche, I. Stetcu, I. Abdurrahman, and A. 8 Bulgac, The LISE package: Solvers for static and time- dependent superﬂuid local density approximation equa- tions in three dimensions, Comp. Phys. Comm. 269, 108130 (2021)

2021
[66]

Abdurrahman, private communication (2025)

I. Abdurrahman, private communication (2025)

2025
[67]

Bulgac, S

A. Bulgac, S. Jin, K.J. Roche, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission Dynamics of 240Pu from saddle to scission and beyond, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019)

2019
[68]

B/suppress locki, Y

J. B/suppress locki, Y. Boneh, J.R. Nix, J. Randrup, M. Robel, A.J. Sierk, W.J. Swiatecki, One-body dissipation and the super-viscidity of nuclei, Ann. Phys. 113, 330 (1978)

1978
[69]

Carlson et al., Evaluation of the Neutron Data Stan- dards, Nucl

A.D. Carlson et al., Evaluation of the Neutron Data Stan- dards, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 143 (2018)

2018
[70]

Albertsson, B.G

M. Albertsson, B.G. Carlsson, T. Døssing, P. M¨ oller, J . Randrup, and S. ˚ Aberg, Excitation energy partition in ﬁssion, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135276 (2020)

2020
[71]

Randrup and R

J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Calculation of ﬁssion observ- ables through event-by-event simulation, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024601 (2009)

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

similar” to those evaporated from the ac- celerated fragments to being “completely diﬀerent

estimated that some fraction of the prompt ﬁssion neutrons are produced by this mechanism and, depend- ing on the assumptions, they will emerge with kinetic energies of several MeV. This mechanism was subsequently studied to various degrees of reﬁnement by Carjan, Wada, and collaborators [39–57] who calculated the eﬀect on the initial neutron wave functio...

work page

[2] [2]

!!" !!!"!!# !!

included also ﬁssion of 236U and 240Pu which yielded very similar results. For the three cases together, the scission neutrons had energies up to 16 − 18 MeV, with a mean energy of ≈ 3 MeV, and their multiplicity was con- servatively estimated to be 9 − 14% of the total. The TDDFT treatment presents the state-of-the-art framework for self-consistent fully...

work page

[3] [3]

!!" # $

(2) Here m is the nucleon mass, ρ is the nucleon density in the bulk region of the fragment, and ¯v ≈ 3 4 vF is the mean nucleon speed (with vF ≈ 8. 4 fm/ 10− 22s being the Fermi 4 speed). The integral is over the deforming part of the surface, with U (s) = ˙h0g(s) cos β (s) being the velocity of the bulge surface element in the direction normal to the bu...

work page

[4] [4]

065 catapult neutrons, corresponding to ≈ 2.7% of the total prompt neutron multiplicity ν = 2. 42 [65]. Figure 5 shows the energy distribution of the boosted neutrons at the various stages of the process. After their initial reﬂection oﬀ the inwards moving bulge surface, those neutrons that have become unbound ( i.e. their en- ergy exceeds the escape ener...

work page

[5] [5]

Hahn and F

O. Hahn and F. Straßmann, ¨Uber den Nachweis und das Verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neu- tronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle, Naturwissens. 27, 11 (1939)

work page 1939

[6] [6]

Meitner and O.R

L. Meitner and O.R. Frisch, Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: A New Type of Nuclear Reaction, Nature 143, 329 (1939)

work page 1939

[7] [7]

McMillan, Radioactive Recoils from Uranium Acti- vated by Neutrons, Phys

E. McMillan, Radioactive Recoils from Uranium Acti- vated by Neutrons, Phys. Rev. 55, 510 (1939)

work page 1939

[8] [8]

Roberts, R.C

R.B. Roberts, R.C. Meyer, and P. Wang, Further Obser- vations on the Splitting of Uranium and Thorium, Phys. Rev. 55, 510 (1939)

work page 1939