GraphPI: Efficient Protein Inference with Graph Neural Networks

Ali Ghodsi; Jiazhen Chen; Lei Xin; Zheng Ma

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 101 references

GraphPI: Efficient Protein Inference with Graph Neural Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read GraphPI uses a graph neural network on protein-peptide-PSM graphs to infer proteins accurately across datasets without any fine-tuning.

desk verdict GraphPI frames protein inference as GNN node classification on a protein-peptide-PSM graph and uses self-training on pseudo-labels, but the abstract supplies no numbers or baselines to support its performance or universality claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.04376 v1 submitted 2026-05-06 cs.LG

Zheng Ma , Jiazhen Chen , Lei Xin , Ali Ghodsi This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.LG

keywords proteininferencegraphneuralnetworksproteomicsmassspectrometrynodeclassificationself-trainingpseudo-labelspercolator

checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to overcome the lack of labeled data in protein inference by framing it as node classification inside a graph that links proteins to peptides and peptide-spectrum matches. It trains a graph neural network on pseudo-labels generated by an existing algorithm and refines those labels through iterative self-training. Because the input features come from the well-normalized outputs of Percolator, the resulting model works on new datasets without retraining, which cuts computation time and lowers the chance of overfitting. A sympathetic reader would care because protein inference remains a slow step in mass-spectrometry proteomics; a single, fast, general-purpose model could let researchers analyze larger experiments more routinely.

What carries the argument

Graph neural network performing node classification on the protein-peptide-PSM graph, trained via pseudo-labels and self-training.

What would settle it

Apply the released GraphPI model to a new proteomics dataset whose ground-truth proteins are known independently and measure whether its accuracy falls below that of a standard algorithm or whether fine-tuning becomes necessary to match baseline performance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GraphPI models proteins as nodes in a protein-peptide-PSM graph and applies a graph neural network to classify them. The network is trained on pseudo-labels supplied by a conventional protein inference tool and then improved by self-training that keeps only high-confidence predictions. The authors show that the normalized nature of Percolator-derived features lets the same trained model deliver competitive accuracy on multiple independent test datasets while running substantially faster than standard protein inference algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

Pseudo-labels generated by an existing protein inference algorithm are accurate and unbiased enough to serve as training targets for a model that then claims better or equal performance on new data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single trained model can be applied directly to any new dataset that supplies Percolator features.
Overall runtime for protein inference drops significantly compared with common algorithms.
Overfitting risk decreases because no dataset-specific retraining is performed.
The same architecture produces competitive results on several public test collections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same graph-plus-self-training pattern could be tested on other sparse-label problems in bioinformatics that already have reliable but imperfect label generators.
Replacing the initial pseudo-label source with a more accurate or ensemble-based generator might raise final accuracy without changing the rest of the pipeline.
Because the model runs faster, it becomes practical to run protein inference repeatedly inside iterative experimental design loops.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main thing here is that GraphPI treats protein inference as node classification in a graph of proteins, peptides, and PSMs, then trains a GNN with self-training on pseudo-labels generated by an existing algorithm like Percolator. It claims this setup delivers better results and works across datasets without retraining because the features are already well normalized. That framing is new for this task and directly tackles label scarcity by bootstrapping from unlabeled public data plus iterative refinement on high-confidence predictions. The graph structure is a reasonable fit for capturing the dependencies that standard methods often handle separately. The efficiency angle also makes sense for high-volume proteomics work where retraining per dataset is a hassle. What the paper does well is lay out a practical pipeline that avoids the need for large labeled sets and focuses on computational savings. The self-training step is a straightforward way to improve initial labels without external supervision. On the soft spots, the abstract asserts notable gains and reduced run times but gives no metrics, no baseline comparisons, no ablation on the self-training component, and no error analysis. Without those, it is hard to tell whether the GNN actually improves on the starting pseudo-labels or simply inherits their biases. The universality claim rests on an unshown assumption about feature normalization holding across distribution shifts. The circularity is also worth checking: if the model starts from an existing algorithm's outputs, independent ground-truth validation becomes essential to show real progress rather than refinement of the same decisions. This is for computational proteomics researchers who already work with Percolator or similar tools and want to test graph-based alternatives. A reader looking for new ML framings in bioinformatics might find the setup worth examining, though they would need the full results section. It deserves a serious referee. The core idea is coherent and the problem matters, so review can sort out whether the experiments back the claims.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces GraphPI, a GNN-based framework that models protein inference as node classification on a protein-peptide-PSM graph. It trains on unlabeled public datasets using pseudo-labels from an existing protein inference algorithm, augmented by self-training on high-confidence predictions, and claims that the normalized Percolator features enable universal applicability without dataset-specific fine-tuning, yielding notable performance gains and substantially lower computation times than standard methods.

Significance. If the empirical results and generalization claims hold, GraphPI could provide an efficient, scalable alternative for protein inference that reduces reliance on per-dataset retraining and lowers computational overhead in proteomics pipelines. The graph-based formulation and self-training approach for label scarcity are conceptually promising, but the absence of reported metrics, baselines, or validation details prevents assessment of whether these advantages are realized.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claims of 'notable performance' and 'significantly reduced computation times' are asserted without any quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons (e.g., against Percolator or other standard algorithms), ablation studies on the self-training component, or error analysis; this leaves the empirical support for the method's superiority unverified.
[Abstract] Abstract and methods description: training relies on pseudo-labels produced by an existing protein inference algorithm plus iterative self-training; this creates a circularity risk where reported improvements may simply refine the prior algorithm's decisions rather than demonstrate independent gains, and no independent ground-truth validation, cross-dataset distribution-shift experiments, or ablation removing the pseudo-label step are described to address this.
[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'well normalized nature of Percolator features' enables 'universal applicability without dataset-specific fine-tuning' is presented as a key advantage, yet no experiments testing zero-shot transfer across datasets with varying distributions, no details on the feature normalization procedure, and no comparison to fine-tuned baselines are provided to substantiate the generalization property.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'various test datasets' and 'common protein inference algorithms' without naming them or providing references; explicit dataset identifiers and citations would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The comments identify important areas for clarification and strengthening of the empirical support. We respond to each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to address the concerns where possible.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims of 'notable performance' and 'significantly reduced computation times' are asserted without any quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons (e.g., against Percolator or other standard algorithms), ablation studies on the self-training component, or error analysis; this leaves the empirical support for the method's superiority unverified.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific quantitative support rather than qualitative descriptors. The manuscript reports detailed results in the experiments section with tables comparing performance metrics and runtime against standard methods including Percolator. We will revise the abstract to reference these key quantitative outcomes and direct readers to the relevant tables and figures for baselines, ablations, and error analysis. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods description: training relies on pseudo-labels produced by an existing protein inference algorithm plus iterative self-training; this creates a circularity risk where reported improvements may simply refine the prior algorithm's decisions rather than demonstrate independent gains, and no independent ground-truth validation, cross-dataset distribution-shift experiments, or ablation removing the pseudo-label step are described to address this.

Authors: The pseudo-labeling step provides initial supervision on unlabeled data, while the GNN learns additional graph-structured patterns; self-training then iterates on high-confidence model predictions. Evaluation uses held-out test portions of the datasets. We will add an explicit discussion of this validation strategy, including any ground-truth checks available in the public datasets, cross-dataset shift tests, and an ablation that removes the self-training stage to the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'well normalized nature of Percolator features' enables 'universal applicability without dataset-specific fine-tuning' is presented as a key advantage, yet no experiments testing zero-shot transfer across datasets with varying distributions, no details on the feature normalization procedure, and no comparison to fine-tuned baselines are provided to substantiate the generalization property.

Authors: The normalization procedure is described in the methods. We will expand this description with the precise steps used. To further substantiate the generalization claim we will add zero-shot transfer results across datasets with differing characteristics and direct comparisons against fine-tuned variants of the model in the revised experiments section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper trains a GNN on pseudo-labels from an external algorithm (Percolator) plus self-training, then evaluates empirically on separate test datasets while claiming universal applicability due to normalized features. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or result to the inputs by construction (e.g., no fitted parameter renamed as independent prediction, no self-citation chain bearing the central claim, no self-definitional loop). The derivation relies on external benchmarks and feature properties rather than tautological equivalence, making it self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework depends on the quality of pseudo-labels from prior algorithms and on the assumption that Percolator features are already normalized enough to support zero-shot transfer; no independent verification of these premises is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

pseudo-label confidence threshold
Controls which model predictions are promoted to training labels during self-training iterations; value not stated in abstract.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption Percolator features are sufficiently well normalized across datasets to enable universal applicability without fine-tuning
Directly invoked in the abstract to justify the no-fine-tuning claim.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GraphPI: Efficient Protein Inference with Graph Neural Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2605.04376

@misc{pith2026260504376,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GraphPI: Efficient Protein Inference with Graph Neural Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2605.04376}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.04376}
}

read the original abstract

The integration of deep learning approaches in biomedical research has been transformative, enabling breakthroughs in various applications. Despite these strides, its application in protein inference is impeded by the scarcity of extensively labeled datasets, a challenge compounded by the high costs and complexities of accurate protein annotation. In this study, we introduce GraphPI, a novel framework that treats protein inference as a node classification problem. We treat proteins as interconnected nodes within a protein-peptide-PSM graph, utilizing a Graph Neural Network-based architecture to elucidate their interrelations. To address label scarcity, we train the model on a set of unlabeled public protein datasets with pseudo-labels derived from an existing protein inference algorithm, enhanced by self-training to iteratively refine labels based on confidence scores. Contrary to prevalent methodologies necessitating dataset-specific training, our research illustrates that GraphPI, due to the well normalized nature of Percolator features, exhibits universal applicability without dataset-specific fine-tuning, a feature that not only mitigates the risk of overfitting but also enhances computational efficiency. Our empirical experiments reveal notable performance on various test datasets and deliver significantly reduced computation times compared to common protein inference algorithms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04376 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The architecture of our protein inference algorithm leveraging GNN for node clas view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** (a): The schema of the bidirectional tri-partite graph, with view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** An illustrative example of the message passing operation of GNN, where the view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: ROC curve (entrapment FDR vs. number of true proteins) of various models on

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: pAUC (partial AUC) score of various models on the benchmark datasets: (a)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: (a) Inference time of the benchmarked methods on the Yeast dataset. (b) Scaling

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: ROC curve (entrapment FDR vs. number of true proteins) of GraphPI and

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: In (a)&(b), the orange circle represents a peptide with its peptide identification

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Cost.FunctionalEquation (J = ½(x+x⁻¹)−1, washburn_uniqueness_aczel) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

binary cross entropy... L = (1/|Vpro|) Σ [ŷ log y + (1−ŷ) log(1−y)]

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages

[1]

Nesvizhskii and Andrew Keller and Eugene Kolker and Ruedi Aebersold , doi =

Alexey I. Nesvizhskii and Andrew Keller and Eugene Kolker and Ruedi Aebersold , doi =. Analytical Chemistry , title =. 2003 , pages=

work page 2003
[2]

MacCoss and William Stafford Noble , doi =

Oliver Serang and Michael J. MacCoss and William Stafford Noble , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2010 , pages=

work page 2010
[3]

Dijkstra and Oliver Serang and Knut Reinert and Oliver Kohlbacher , doi =

Julianus Pfeuffer and Timo Sachsenberg and Tjeerd M.H. Dijkstra and Oliver Serang and Knut Reinert and Oliver Kohlbacher , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2020 , pages=

work page 2020
[4]

Meyer and Katrin Marcus and Christian Stephan and Oliver Kohlbacher and Martin Eisenacher , doi =

Julian Uszkoreit and Alexandra Maerkens and Yasset Perez-Riverol and Helmut E. Meyer and Katrin Marcus and Christian Stephan and Oliver Kohlbacher and Martin Eisenacher , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2015 , pages=

work page 2015
[5]

Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , year =

Direct Maximization of Protein Identifications from Tandem Mass Spectra , author =. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , year =. doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.012161 , publisher =

work page doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.012161
[6]

PLoS Computational Biology , title =

Minseung Kim and Ameen Eetemadi and Ilias Tagkopoulos , doi =. PLoS Computational Biology , title =. 2017 , pages=

work page 2017
[7]

Canterbury and Jason Weston and William Stafford Noble and Michael J

Lukas Käll and Jesse D. Canterbury and Jason Weston and William Stafford Noble and Michael J. MacCoss , doi =. Nature Methods , title =. 2007 , pages=

work page 2007
[8]

Kipf and Max Welling , booktitle =

Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling , booktitle =. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks , year =

work page

Show all 101 references

[9]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017) , editor =

Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017) , editor =. 2017 , publisher =

2017
[10]

Payne and Michael R

Matthew The and Fredrik Edfors and Yasset Perez-Riverol and Samuel H. Payne and Michael R. Hoopmann and Magnus Palmblad and Björn Forsström and Lukas Käll , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2018 , pages=

2018
[11]

Proteomics , title =

Erik Ahrné and Lars Molzahn and Timo Glatter and Alexander Schmidt , doi =. Proteomics , title =. 2013 , pages=

2013
[12]

Eddes and Laura Hohmann and Jennifer Jackson and Amelia Peterson and Simon Letarte and Philip R

John Klimek and James S. Eddes and Laura Hohmann and Jennifer Jackson and Amelia Peterson and Simon Letarte and Philip R. Gafken and Jonathan E. Katz and Parag Mallick and Hookeun Lee and Alexander Schmidt and Reto Ossola and Jimmy K. Eng and Ruedi Aebersold and Daniel B. Mart...

2008
[13]

Moran and Bin Ma , doi =

Shenheng Guan and Michael F. Moran and Bin Ma , doi =. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , title =. 2019 , pages=

2019
[14]

Messner and Spyros I

Vadim Demichev and Christoph B. Messner and Spyros I. Vernardis and Kathryn S. Lilley and Markus Ralser , doi =. Nature Methods , title =. 2020 , pages=

2020
[15]

Ziaur Rahman and Ngoc Hieu Tran and Lei Xin and Baozhen Shan and Ming Li , doi =

Fatema Tuz Zohora and M. Ziaur Rahman and Ngoc Hieu Tran and Lei Xin and Baozhen Shan and Ming Li , doi =. Scientific Reports , title =. 2019 , publisher=

2019
[16]

Elias and Steven P

Joshua E. Elias and Steven P. Gygi , doi =. Nature Methods , title =. 2007 , pages=

2007
[17]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , title =

Ngoc Hieu Tran and Xianglilan Zhang and Lei Xin and Baozhen Shan and Ming Li , doi =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , title =. 2017 , pages=

2017
[18]

Nature Machine Intelligence , title =

Rui Qiao and Ngoc Hieu Tran and Lei Xin and Xin Chen and Ming Li and Baozhen Shan and Ali Ghodsi , doi =. Nature Machine Intelligence , title =. 2021 , pages=

2021
[19]

Nature Methods , title =

Ngoc Hieu Tran and Rui Qiao and Lei Xin and Xin Chen and Chuyi Liu and Xianglilan Zhang and Baozhen Shan and Ali Ghodsi and Ming Li , doi =. Nature Methods , title =. 2019 , pages=

2019
[20]

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , title =

Guansong Pang and Cheng Yan and Chunhua Shen and Anton van den Hengel and Xiao Bai , doi =. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , title =. 2020 , pages=

2020
[21]

Keppler and Samuel M

Dominique Kreutz and Andrea Bileck and Kerstin Plessl and Denise Wolrab and Michael Groessl and Bernhard K. Keppler and Samuel M. Meier and Christopher Gerner , doi =. Chemistry - A European Journal , title =. 2017 , pages=

2017
[22]

Meier and Dominique Kreutz and Lilli Winter and Matthias H.M

Samuel M. Meier and Dominique Kreutz and Lilli Winter and Matthias H.M. Klose and Klaudia Cseh and Tamara Weiss and Andrea Bileck and Beatrix Alte and Johanna C. Mader and Samir Jana and Annesha Chatterjee and Arindam Bhattacharyya and Michaela Hejl and Michael A. Jakupec and ...

2017
[23]

Pervushin and Siu Kwan Sze and Jodhbir S

Anandalakshmi Venkatraman and Bamaprasad Dutta and Elavazhagan Murugan and Hao Piliang and Rajamani Lakshminaryanan and Anita Chan Sook Yee and Konstantin V. Pervushin and Siu Kwan Sze and Jodhbir S. Mehta , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2017 , pages=

2017
[24]

Clinical Proteomics , title =

Mamatha Bhat and Sergi Clotet-Freixas and Cristina Baciu and Elisa Pasini and Ahmed Hammad and Tommy Ivanics and Shelby Reid and Amirhossein Azhie and Marc Angeli and Anand Ghanekar and Sandra Fischer and Gonzalo Sapisochin and Ana Konvalinka , doi =. Clinical Proteomics , tit...

2021
[25]

Lupton and Charles Bayly-Jones and Laura D’Andrea and Cheng Huang and Ralf B

Christopher J. Lupton and Charles Bayly-Jones and Laura D’Andrea and Cheng Huang and Ralf B. Schittenhelm and Hari Venugopal and James C. Whisstock and Michelle L. Halls and Andrew M. Ellisdon , doi =. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology , title =. 2021 , pages=

2021
[26]

Bijnsdorp and Franziska Böttger and Sander R

Madiha Mumtaz and Irene V. Bijnsdorp and Franziska Böttger and Sander R. Piersma and Thang V. Pham and Samiullah Mumtaz and Ruud H. Brakenhoff and M. Waheed Akhtar and Connie R. Jimenez , doi =. Clinical Proteomics , title =. 2022 , pages=

2022
[27]

Vincent , doi =

Veronique Fischer and Vincent Hisler and Elisabeth Scheer and Elisabeth Lata and Bastien Morlet and Damien Plassard and Dominique Helmlinger and Didier Devys and László Tora and Stephane D. Vincent , doi =. Nucleic Acids Research , title =. 2022 , pages=

2022
[28]

McAlear and Yang Yue and Takumi Higaki and Sarah E

Takashi Hotta and Thomas S. McAlear and Yang Yue and Takumi Higaki and Sarah E. Haynes and Alexey I. Nesvizhskii and David Sept and Kristen J. Verhey and Susanne Bechstedt and Ryoma Ohi , doi =. Current Biology , title =. 2022 , pages=

2022
[29]

Redox Biology , volume=

SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 reshapes the ER through forming mixed disulfides with ER oxidoreductases , author=. Redox Biology , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2022.102388 , year=

2022 doi
[30]

Williams and Oliver Daumke and Bernard Payrastre and Sonia Severin and Marc Nazaré and Volker Haucke , doi =

Wen Ting Lo and Hassane Belabed and Murat Kücükdisli and Juliane Metag and Yvette Roske and Polina Prokofeva and Yohei Ohashi and André Horatscheck and Davide Cirillo and Michael Krauss and Christopher Schmied and Martin Neuenschwander and Jens Peter von Kries and Guillaume Mé...

2023
[31]

BMC Genomics , title =

Yanting Su and Yuanyuan Guo and Jieyu Guo and Ting Zeng and Ting Wang and Wu Liu , doi =. BMC Genomics , title =. 2023 , pages=

2023
[32]

En Chi Hsu and Meghan A. Rice and Abel Bermudez and Fernando Jose Garcia Marques and Merve Aslan and Shiqin Liu and Ali Ghoochani and Chiyuan Amy Zhang and Yun Sheng Chen and Aimen Zlitni and Sahil Kumar and Rosalie Nolley and Frezghi Habte and Michelle Shen and Kashyap Koul a...

2020
[33]

International Journal of Molecular Sciences , title =

Ilaria Cela and Maria Concetta Cufaro and Maurine Fucito and Damiana Pieragostino and Paola Lanuti and Michele Sallese and Piero Del Boccio and Adele Di Matteo and Nerino Allocati and Vincenzo De Laurenzi and Luca Federici , doi =. International Journal of Molecular Sciences ,...

2022
[34]

Grant and Benjamin Diament and Barbara Frewen and J

Sean McIlwain and Kaipo Tamura and Attila Kertesz-Farkas and Charles E. Grant and Benjamin Diament and Barbara Frewen and J. Jeffry Howbert and Michael R. Hoopmann and Lukas Käll and Jimmy K. Eng and Michael J. MacCoss and William Stafford Noble , doi =. Journal of Proteome Re...

2014
[35]

2009 , note =

Ramakrishnan, S and Vogel, C , title =. 2009 , note =

2009
[36]

Eng and Michael R

Jimmy K. Eng and Michael R. Hoopmann and Tahmina A. Jahan and Jarrett D. Egertson and William S. Noble and Michael J. MacCoss , doi =. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry , title =. 2015 , pages=

2015
[37]

and Cebron, Nicolas and Dill, Fabian and Gabriel, Thomas R

Berthold, Michael R. and Cebron, Nicolas and Dill, Fabian and Gabriel, Thomas R. and K. KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner , journal =. 2009 , volume =

2009
[38]

Chambers and Brendan MacLean and Robert Burke and Dario Amodei and Daniel L

Matthew C. Chambers and Brendan MacLean and Robert Burke and Dario Amodei and Daniel L. Ruderman and Steffen Neumann and Laurent Gatto and Bernd Fischer and Brian Pratt and Jarrett Egertson and Katherine Hoff and Darren Kessner and Natalie Tasman and Nicholas Shulman and Barba...

2012
[39]

Hannes L. Röst and Timo Sachsenberg and Stephan Aiche and Chris Bielow and Hendrik Weisser and Fabian Aicheler and Sandro Andreotti and Hans Christian Ehrlich and Petra Gutenbrunner and Erhan Kenar and Xiao Liang and Sven Nahnsen and Lars Nilse and Julianus Pfeuffer and George...

2016
[40]

Herman and Carl G

Kimberly D. Herman and Carl G. Wright and Helen M. Marriott and Sam C. McCaughran and Kieran A. Bowden and Mark O. Collins and Stephen A. Renshaw and Lynne R. Prince , doi =. Frontiers in Immunology , title =. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[41]

Vizeacoumar and Renuka Dahiya and Sara L

Amr El Zawily and Frederick S. Vizeacoumar and Renuka Dahiya and Sara L. Banerjee and Kalpana K. Bhanumathy and Hussain Elhasasna and Glinton Hanover and Jessica C. Sharpe and Malkon G. Sanchez and Paul Greidanus and R. Greg Stacey and Kyung Mee Moon and Ilya Alexandrov and Ju...

2023
[42]

Jaffray and Michael H

Ellis G. Jaffray and Michael H. Tatham and Barbara Mojsa and Magda Liczmanska and Alejandro Rojas-Fernandez and Yili Yin and Graeme Ball and Ronald T. Hay , doi =. Journal of Cell Biology , title =. 2023 , pages=

2023
[43]

Saltzman and Mei Leng and Bhoomi Bhatt and Purba Singh and Doug W

Alexander B. Saltzman and Mei Leng and Bhoomi Bhatt and Purba Singh and Doug W. Chan and Lacey Dobrolecki and Hamssika Chandrasekaran and Jong M. Choi and Antrix Jain and Sung Y. Jung and Michael T. Lewis and Matthew J. Ellis and Anna Malovannaya , doi =. Molecular and Cellula...

2018
[44]

Leigh Anderson and Norman G

N. Leigh Anderson and Norman G. Anderson , doi =. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP , title =. 2002 , pages=

2002
[45]

Diamandis , doi =

Eleftherios P. Diamandis , doi =. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , title =. 2004 , pages=

2004
[46]

Hopkins and Colin R

Andrew L. Hopkins and Colin R. Groom , doi =. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery , title =. 2002 , pages=

2002
[47]

Schiöth , doi =

Mathias Rask-Andersen and Markus Sällman Almén and Helgi B. Schiöth , doi =. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery , title =. 2011 , pages=

2011
[48]

Nucleic Acids Research , title =

Minoru Kanehisa and Susumu Goto and Shuichi Kawashima and Yasushi Okuno and Masahiro Hattori , doi =. Nucleic Acids Research , title =. 2004 , pages=

2004
[49]

Ball and Judith A

Michael Ashburner and Catherine A. Ball and Judith A. Blake and David Botstein and Heather Butler and J. Michael Cherry and Allan P. Davis and Kara Dolinski and Selina S. Dwight and Janan T. Eppig and Midori A. Harris and David P. Hill and Laurie Issel-Tarver and Andrew Kasars...

2000
[50]

Holmes , doi =

Dawn E. Holmes , doi =. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems , title =. 2022 , pages=

2022
[51]

BMC Bioinformatics , title =

Yong Fuga Li and Predrag Radivojac , doi =. BMC Bioinformatics , title =. 2012 , pages=

2012
[52]

Neapolitan , doi =

Richard E. Neapolitan , doi =. Probabilistic Methods for Bioinformatics: With an Introduction to Bayesian Networks , title =
[53]

E Ahmed , doi =

S. E Ahmed , doi =. Technometrics , title =
[54]

L.; Anderson, N

Anderson, N. L.; Anderson, N. G. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. 2002

2002
[55]

Diamandis, E. P. Mass spectrometry as a diagnostic and a cancer biomarker discovery tool: Opportunities and potential limitations. 2004

2004
[56]

L.; Groom, C

Hopkins, A. L.; Groom, C. R. The druggable genome. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 727--730

2002
[57]

M.; Serang, O.; Reinert, K.; Kohlbacher, O

Pfeuffer, J.; Sachsenberg, T.; Dijkstra, T. M.; Serang, O.; Reinert, K.; Kohlbacher, O. EPIFANY: A Method for Efficient High-Confidence Protein Inference. Journal of Proteome Research 2020, 19, 1060--1072

2020
[58]

J.; Noble, W

Serang, O.; MacCoss, M. J.; Noble, W. S. Efficient marginalization to compute protein posterior probabilities from shotgun mass spectrometry data. Journal of Proteome Research 2010, 9, 5346--5357

2010
[59]

I.; Keller, A.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R

Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Keller, A.; Kolker, E.; Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2003, 75, 4646--4658

2003
[60]

E.; Marcus, K.; Stephan, C.; Kohlbacher, O.; Eisenacher, M

Uszkoreit, J.; Maerkens, A.; Perez-Riverol, Y.; Meyer, H. E.; Marcus, K.; Stephan, C.; Kohlbacher, O.; Eisenacher, M. PIA: An Intuitive Protein Inference Engine with a Web-Based User Interface. Journal of Proteome Research 2015, 14, 2988--2997

2015
[61]

Ahmed, S. E. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Technometrics 2008, 50

2008
[62]

Neapolitan, R. E. Probabilistic methods for bioinformatics: With an introduction to bayesian networks; 2009

2009
[63]

F.; Ma, B

Guan, S.; Moran, M. F.; Ma, B. Prediction of LC-MS/MS properties of peptides from sequence by deep learning. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2019, 18, 2099--2107

2019
[64]

T.; Rahman, M

Zohora, F. T.; Rahman, M. Z.; Tran, N. H.; Xin, L.; Shan, B.; Li, M. DeepIso: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Feature Detection from LC-MS map. Scientific Reports 2019, 9, 1--13

2019
[65]

B.; Vernardis, S

Demichev, V.; Messner, C. B.; Vernardis, S. I.; Lilley, K. S.; Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nature Methods 2020, 17, 41--44

2020
[66]

H.; Zhang, X.; Xin, L.; Shan, B.; Li, M

Tran, N. H.; Zhang, X.; Xin, L.; Shan, B.; Li, M. De novo peptide sequencing by deep learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2017, 114, 8247--8252

2017
[67]

H.; Xin, L.; Chen, X.; Li, M.; Shan, B.; Ghodsi, A

Qiao, R.; Tran, N. H.; Xin, L.; Chen, X.; Li, M.; Shan, B.; Ghodsi, A. Computationally instrument-resolution-independent de novo peptide sequencing for high-resolution devices. Nature Machine Intelligence 2021, 3, 420--425

2021
[68]

H.; Qiao, R.; Xin, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Shan, B.; Ghodsi, A.; Li, M

Tran, N. H.; Qiao, R.; Xin, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Shan, B.; Ghodsi, A.; Li, M. Deep learning enables de novo peptide sequencing from data-independent-acquisition mass spectrometry. Nature Methods 2019, 16, 63--66

2019
[69]

J.; Noble, W

Spivak, M.; Weston, J.; Tomazela, D.; MacCoss, M. J.; Noble, W. S. Direct Maximization of Protein Identifications from Tandem Mass Spectra. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2012, 11, M111.012161

2012
[70]

E.; Gygi, S

Elias, J. E.; Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nature Methods 2007, 4, 207--214

2007
[71]

DeepPep: Deep proteome inference from peptide profiles

Kim, M.; Eetemadi, A.; Tagkopoulos, I. DeepPep: Deep proteome inference from peptide profiles. PLoS Computational Biology 2017, 13, e1005661

2017
[72]

N.; Welling, M

Kipf, T. N.; Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017 - Conference Track Proceedings. 2017

2017
[73]

Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs

Hamilton, W.; Ying, Z.; Leskovec, J. Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). 2017; pp 1025--1035

2017
[74]

D.; Weston, J.; Noble, W

Käll, L.; Canterbury, J. D.; Weston, J.; Noble, W. S.; MacCoss, M. J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nature Methods 2007, 4, 923--925

2007
[75]

Self-trained Deep Ordinal Regression for End-to-End Video Anomaly Detection

Pang, G.; Yan, C.; Shen, C.; van den Hengel, A.; Bai, X. Self-trained Deep Ordinal Regression for End-to-End Video Anomaly Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020; pp 12173--12182

2020
[76]

K.; Hoopmann, M

Eng, J. K.; Hoopmann, M. R.; Jahan, T. A.; Egertson, J. D.; Noble, W. S.; MacCoss, M. J. A Deeper Look into Comet - Implementation and Features. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2015, 26, 1865--1874

2015
[77]

K.; Meier, S

Kreutz, D.; Bileck, A.; Plessl, K.; Wolrab, D.; Groessl, M.; Keppler, B. K.; Meier, S. M.; Gerner, C. Response Profiling Using Shotgun Proteomics Enables Global Metallodrug Mechanisms of Action To Be Established. Chemistry - A European Journal 2017, 23, 1881--1890

2017
[78]

Meier, S. M. et al. An Organoruthenium Anticancer Agent Shows Unexpected Target Selectivity For Plectin. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition 2017, 56, 8267--8271

2017
[79]

Venkatraman, A.; Dutta, B.; Murugan, E.; Piliang, H.; Lakshminaryanan, R.; Yee, A. C. S.; Pervushin, K. V.; Sze, S. K.; Mehta, J. S. Proteomic Analysis of Amyloid Corneal Aggregates from TGFBI-H626R Lattice Corneal Dystrophy Patient Implicates Serine-Protease HTRA1 in Mutation...

2017
[80]

Combined proteomic/transcriptomic signature of recurrence post-liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan

Bhat, M.; Clotet-Freixas, S.; Baciu, C.; Pasini, E.; Hammad, A.; Ivanics, T.; Reid, S.; Azhie, A.; Angeli, M.; Ghanekar, A.; Fischer, S.; Sapisochin, G.; Konvalinka, A. Combined proteomic/transcriptomic signature of recurrence post-liver transplantation for hepatocellular carc...

2021
[81]

Zawily, A. E. et al. A Multipronged Unbiased Strategy Guides the Development of an Anti-EGFR/EPHA2–Bispecific Antibody for Combination Cancer Therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 2023, 29, OF1--OF16

2023
[82]

J.; Bayly-Jones, C.; D’Andrea, L.; Huang, C.; Schittenhelm, R

Lupton, C. J.; Bayly-Jones, C.; D’Andrea, L.; Huang, C.; Schittenhelm, R. B.; Venugopal, H.; Whisstock, J. C.; Halls, M. L.; Ellisdon, A. M. The cryo-EM structure of the human neurofibromin dimer reveals the molecular basis for neurofibromatosis type 1. Nature Structural and M...

2021
[83]

V.; Böttger, F.; Piersma, S

Mumtaz, M.; Bijnsdorp, I. V.; Böttger, F.; Piersma, S. R.; Pham, T. V.; Mumtaz, S.; Brakenhoff, R. H.; Akhtar, M. W.; Jimenez, C. R. Secreted protein markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Clinical Proteomics 2022, 19, 1--15

2022
[84]

Fischer, V.; Hisler, V.; Scheer, E.; Lata, E.; Morlet, B.; Plassard, D.; Helmlinger, D.; Devys, D.; Tora, L.; Vincent, S. D. SUPT3H-less SAGA coactivator can assemble and function without significantly perturbing RNA polymerase II transcription in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acid...

2022
[85]

G.; Tatham, M

Jaffray, E. G.; Tatham, M. H.; Mojsa, B.; Liczmanska, M.; Rojas-Fernandez, A.; Yin, Y.; Ball, G.; Hay, R. T. The p97/VCP segregase is essential for arsenic-induced degradation of PML and PML-RARA. Journal of Cell Biology 2023, 222, e202201027

2023
[86]

S.; Yue, Y.; Higaki, T.; Haynes, S

Hotta, T.; McAlear, T. S.; Yue, Y.; Higaki, T.; Haynes, S. E.; Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Sept, D.; Verhey, K. J.; Bechstedt, S.; Ohi, R. EML2-S constitutes a new class of proteins that recognizes and regulates the dynamics of tyrosinated microtubules. Current Biology 2022, 32, 3898--3910

2022
[87]

Redox Biology 2022, 54, 102388

Liu, P.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, H.; Cheng, F.; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C.-c.; others SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 reshapes the ER through forming mixed disulfides with ER oxidoreductases. Redox Biology 2022, 54, 102388

2022
[88]

Lo, W. T. et al. Development of selective inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase C2 . Nature Chemical Biology 2023, 19, 18--27

2023
[89]

C.; Fucito, M.; Pieragostino, D.; Lanuti, P.; Sallese, M.; Boccio, P

Cela, I.; Cufaro, M. C.; Fucito, M.; Pieragostino, D.; Lanuti, P.; Sallese, M.; Boccio, P. D.; Matteo, A. D.; Allocati, N.; Laurenzi, V. D.; Federici, L. Proteomic Investigation of the Role of Nucleostemin in Nucleophosmin-Mutated OCI-AML 3 Cell Line. International Journal of ...

2022
[90]

D.; Wright, C

Herman, K. D.; Wright, C. G.; Marriott, H. M.; McCaughran, S. C.; Bowden, K. A.; Collins, M. O.; Renshaw, S. A.; Prince, L. R. The EGFR/ErbB inhibitor neratinib modifies the neutrophil phosphoproteome and promotes apoptosis and clearance by airway macrophages. Frontiers in Imm...

2022
[91]

Study of FOXO1-interacting proteins using TurboID-based proximity labeling technology

Su, Y.; Guo, Y.; Guo, J.; Zeng, T.; Wang, T.; Liu, W. Study of FOXO1-interacting proteins using TurboID-based proximity labeling technology. BMC Genomics 2023, 24, 1--13

2023
[92]

Hsu, E. C. et al. Trop2 is a driver of metastatic prostate cancer with neuroendocrine phenotype via PARP1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2020, 117, 2032--2042

2020
[93]

H.; Hoopmann, M

The, M.; Edfors, F.; Perez-Riverol, Y.; Payne, S. H.; Hoopmann, M. R.; Palmblad, M.; Forsström, B.; Käll, L. A Protein Standard That Emulates Homology for the Characterization of Protein Inference Algorithms. Journal of Proteome Research 2018, 17, 1879--1886

2018
[94]

Critical assessment of proteome-wide label-free absolute abundance estimation strategies

Ahrné, E.; Molzahn, L.; Glatter, T.; Schmidt, A. Critical assessment of proteome-wide label-free absolute abundance estimation strategies. Proteomics 2013, 13, 2567--2578

2013
[95]

S.; Hohmann, L.; Jackson, J.; Peterson, A.; Letarte, S.; Gafken, P

Klimek, J.; Eddes, J. S.; Hohmann, L.; Jackson, J.; Peterson, A.; Letarte, S.; Gafken, P. R.; Katz, J. E.; Mallick, P.; Lee, H.; Schmidt, A.; Ossola, R.; Eng, J. K.; Aebersold, R.; Martin, D. B. The standard protein mix database: A diverse data set to assist in the production ...

2008
[96]

Gold Standard of Protein Expression in Yeast

Ramakrishnan, S.; Vogel, C. Gold Standard of Protein Expression in Yeast. 2009; Available from: http://www.marcottelab.org/MSdata/gold\_yeast.html

2009
[97]

B.; Leng, M.; Bhatt, B.; Singh, P.; Chan, D

Saltzman, A. B.; Leng, M.; Bhatt, B.; Singh, P.; Chan, D. W.; Dobrolecki, L.; Chandrasekaran, H.; Choi, J. M.; Jain, A.; Jung, S. Y.; Lewis, M. T.; Ellis, M. J.; Malovannaya, A. GpGrouper: A peptide grouping algorithm for gene-centric inference and quantitation of bottom-up pr...

2018
[98]

Chambers, M. C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nature Biotechnology 2012, 30, 918--920

2012
[99]

Röst, H. L. et al. OpenMS: A flexible open-source software platform for mass spectrometry data analysis. Nature Methods 2016, 13, 741--748

2016
[100]

E.; Diament, B.; Frewen, B.; Howbert, J

McIlwain, S.; Tamura, K.; Kertesz-Farkas, A.; Grant, C. E.; Diament, B.; Frewen, B.; Howbert, J. J.; Hoopmann, M. R.; Käll, L.; Eng, J. K.; MacCoss, M. J.; Noble, W. S. Crux: Rapid open source protein tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Journal of Proteome Research 2014, 13, 4488--4491

2014
[101]

R.; Cebron, N.; Dill, F.; Gabriel, T

Berthold, M. R.; Cebron, N.; Dill, F.; Gabriel, T. R.; K \"o tter, T.; Meinl, T.; Ohl, P.; Thiel, K.; Wiswedel, B. KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner. SIGKDD Explor. 2009, 11, 26--31 mcitethebibliography

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Nesvizhskii and Andrew Keller and Eugene Kolker and Ruedi Aebersold , doi =

Alexey I. Nesvizhskii and Andrew Keller and Eugene Kolker and Ruedi Aebersold , doi =. Analytical Chemistry , title =. 2003 , pages=

work page 2003

[2] [2]

MacCoss and William Stafford Noble , doi =

Oliver Serang and Michael J. MacCoss and William Stafford Noble , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2010 , pages=

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Dijkstra and Oliver Serang and Knut Reinert and Oliver Kohlbacher , doi =

Julianus Pfeuffer and Timo Sachsenberg and Tjeerd M.H. Dijkstra and Oliver Serang and Knut Reinert and Oliver Kohlbacher , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2020 , pages=

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Meyer and Katrin Marcus and Christian Stephan and Oliver Kohlbacher and Martin Eisenacher , doi =

Julian Uszkoreit and Alexandra Maerkens and Yasset Perez-Riverol and Helmut E. Meyer and Katrin Marcus and Christian Stephan and Oliver Kohlbacher and Martin Eisenacher , doi =. Journal of Proteome Research , title =. 2015 , pages=

work page 2015

[5] [5]

Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , year =

Direct Maximization of Protein Identifications from Tandem Mass Spectra , author =. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics , year =. doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.012161 , publisher =

work page doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.012161

[6] [6]

PLoS Computational Biology , title =

Minseung Kim and Ameen Eetemadi and Ilias Tagkopoulos , doi =. PLoS Computational Biology , title =. 2017 , pages=

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Canterbury and Jason Weston and William Stafford Noble and Michael J

Lukas Käll and Jesse D. Canterbury and Jason Weston and William Stafford Noble and Michael J. MacCoss , doi =. Nature Methods , title =. 2007 , pages=

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Kipf and Max Welling , booktitle =

Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling , booktitle =. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks , year =

work page