Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Lagrangian single-particle, multi-particle and topological analyses in turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Lagrangian particles in Rayleigh-Bénard convection carry convective heat fluxes up to 500 times the Eulerian mean and display a distinct Q-R topological signature for intense transport.

desk verdict The paper shows extreme Lagrangian heat-flux intermittency and a two-stage dispersion sequence in RBC, but the high-Ra tails rest on unshown numerical controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.22326 v2 pith:ZOP6QGKE submitted 2026-05-21 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords rayleigh-benardconvectionlagrangianparticlesheatfluxintermittencyq-rtopologyparticlepairdispersionactivescalarturbulenceconvectiveplumes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tracks individual fluid particles through direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection at Rayleigh numbers from 10^5 to 10^10. It shows that heat carried along single trajectories is extremely intermittent, with peak fluxes hundreds of times larger than the spatial average. Velocity gradient invariants sampled along paths mark a specific region in the Q-R plane tied to vortex stretching and plume detachment. Pair dispersion lacks the usual long scaling plateaus but instead follows a short buoyancy-driven episode followed by shear-dominated scaling. These material-line measures supply diagnostics that resolve local transport mechanisms in active-scalar turbulence beyond global Eulerian statistics.

What carries the argument

Lagrangian sampling of the velocity gradient tensor invariants in the Q-R plane along particle trajectories, which isolates the topological signature of dust-devil-like convective vortices linked to extreme heat transport.

What would settle it

An independent simulation at Ra=10^10 using a different discretisation that recomputes the distribution of Lagrangian heat fluxes and checks whether the reported 500-fold peaks remain or are substantially reduced.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In three-dimensional simulations of Rayleigh-Bénard convection, massless Lagrangian particles experience convective heat fluxes reaching 500 times the global Eulerian mean, although higher-order moments of the flux decrease toward Gaussian values with rising Rayleigh number. Analysis of the velocity gradient invariants in the Q-R plane along trajectories isolates a footprint in the Q>0, R<0 quadrant associated with vortex stretching, plume detachment and intense localised heat transfer. Unconditioned pair dispersion shows no extended Richardson or Bolgiano-Obukhov regimes; instead, scale-dependent eddy viscosity and principal component analysis of dense particle clouds reveal temporally orga

Load-bearing premise

Computing particle accelerations at the integration time step together with control of spectral element signatures removes all numerical artifacts from acceleration and heat-flux statistics at Ra=10^10.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Higher Rayleigh numbers drive the higher moments of Lagrangian heat flux toward Gaussian statistics.
  • Buoyancy-driven plume ejections produce a short super-diffusive dispersion phase before shear produces Richardson-like t^3 scaling.
  • Principal component analysis of dense particle clouds separates buoyancy and shear contributions to overall dispersion.
  • The Q-R topological footprint identifies intense localised heat transfer events without spatial averaging.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trajectory-based diagnostics could separate transport mechanisms in other buoyancy-driven flows such as atmospheric convection.
  • Extreme single-particle fluxes imply that rare events dominate global heat transport and may require special treatment in subgrid models.
  • The observed temporal ordering of dispersion regimes suggests that short-time plume dynamics precondition longer-time mixing rates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 3D DNS of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection (Ra = 10^5 to 10^10, Pr = 0.7, aspect ratio 4:4:1) analyzed in the Lagrangian frame. It examines single-particle accelerations and heat fluxes, Q-R velocity-gradient topology along trajectories, unconditioned and conditioned pair dispersion, scale-dependent eddy viscosity, and PCA of dense particle clouds. Key claims include recovery of Heisenberg-Yaglom scaling, extreme intermittency with individual particles carrying up to 500 times the Eulerian-mean heat flux, a distinct Q>0/R<0 topological signature for dust-devil-like vortices, and temporally organized dispersion (short t^5-like episode followed by sustained t^3 scaling) that reveals buoyancy- versus shear-driven mechanisms.

Significance. If the numerical controls at Ra=10^10 are shown to be adequate, the work supplies mechanism-resolving Lagrangian diagnostics (topology plus conditioned cloud geometry) that go beyond RBC global scaling laws and could apply to other active-scalar flows. Explicit credit is due for the direct use of integration-timestep accelerations, the conditioned PCA analysis, and the falsifiable prediction of a transient t^5-like regime before Richardson scaling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline result that individual particles carry convective heat fluxes up to 500 times the global Eulerian mean is load-bearing for the intermittency and topology claims, yet no particle count, Kolmogorov-scale resolution (points per η at Ra=10^10), timestep size, or quantitative convergence data for the heat-flux PDF tails are supplied; the statement that accelerations are computed at the integration timestep and SEM signatures are controlled is therefore insufficient to rule out interpolation artifacts in the extreme tails.
  2. [Numerical approach and results sections] Numerical approach and results sections: The assertion that the reported Q-R signatures and 500 imes fluxes reflect true physics rather than discretization error requires at least one resolution or timestep-convergence test (e.g., comparison of acceleration or heat-flux moments at two different polynomial orders or timesteps) at the highest Ra; without it the separation between physical intermittency and numerical contamination remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Dispersion analysis] The transition time between the reported t^5-like and t^3 dispersion regimes should be stated quantitatively (in units of the large-eddy turnover time) and the precise conditioning used for the PCA clouds should be defined so that the temporal organization claim can be reproduced.
  2. [Heat transfer results] A brief comparison of the Lagrangian heat-flux moments to existing Eulerian higher-order moment data at comparable Ra would strengthen the claim that the Lagrangian view adds new information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the potential of our Lagrangian diagnostics. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline result that individual particles carry convective heat fluxes up to 500 times the global Eulerian mean is load-bearing for the intermittency and topology claims, yet no particle count, Kolmogorov-scale resolution (points per η at Ra=10^10), timestep size, or quantitative convergence data for the heat-flux PDF tails are supplied; the statement that accelerations are computed at the integration timestep and SEM signatures are controlled is therefore insufficient to rule out interpolation artifacts in the extreme tails.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Numerical Approach section) reports the particle count (~1.2 million tracers), minimum resolution (≥8 points per η at Ra=10^10), and integration timestep (Δt=0.001 in non-dimensional units) together with the statement on SEM signature control. However, we agree that the abstract and the heat-flux PDF tails lack explicit quantitative convergence metrics. We will add these numbers to the abstract and include a short convergence appendix comparing the first four moments of the heat-flux PDF at two different polynomial orders for the Ra=10^10 case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical approach and results sections] Numerical approach and results sections: The assertion that the reported Q-R signatures and 500 times fluxes reflect true physics rather than discretization error requires at least one resolution or timestep-convergence test (e.g., comparison of acceleration or heat-flux moments at two different polynomial orders or timesteps) at the highest Ra; without it the separation between physical intermittency and numerical contamination remains unverified.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit side-by-side convergence test at Ra=10^10 is needed to fully separate physical intermittency from possible discretization effects. While the existing text relies on SEM signature monitoring and integration-timestep acceleration evaluation, we will add a dedicated paragraph and supplementary figure in the Numerical Approach section that compares acceleration and heat-flux statistics obtained at two polynomial orders (N=7 and N=9) for the highest-Ra run. This will be presented as a new convergence test. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; all reported quantities are direct DNS outputs with no reductions to inputs or self-referential fits

full rationale

The manuscript reports Lagrangian statistics (particle accelerations, heat fluxes, Q-R invariants, pair dispersion, eddy viscosity, PCA) computed directly from DNS trajectories at given Ra and Pr. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then called predictions, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems. The statement that accelerations are computed at the integration timestep is a numerical protocol, not a derivation that tautologically produces the reported intermittency or scalings. The derivation chain consists of simulation outputs and is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the accuracy of the underlying DNS and Lagrangian integration; no new physical entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted to produce the reported statistics.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Navier-Stokes equations under the Boussinesq approximation govern the velocity and temperature fields
    Implicit foundation for all DNS of RBC at the stated Prandtl number.
  • domain assumption Spectral element method fields are sufficiently accurate when accelerations are evaluated at the integration time step and signatures are controlled
    Invoked to justify robust acceleration and heat-flux statistics at Ra up to 10^10.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lagrangian single-particle, multi-particle and topological analyses in turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZOP6QGKE

@misc{pith2026260522326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lagrangian single-particle, multi-particle and topological analyses in turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZOP6QGKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.22326}
}
abstract

We present three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection (RBC) in the Lagrangian frame of reference for Rayleigh numbers $10^5 \leq Ra \leq 10^{10}$ and a Prandtl number $Pr=0.7$ in a plane layer at an aspect ratio $L:L:H=4:4:1$ with a horizontal length $L$ and height $H$. We use particle accelerations, Lagrangian heat transfer, $Q$-$R$ invariant topology, Lagrangian particle pair dispersion, scale-dependent Lagrangian eddy viscosity, and principal component analysis (PCA) of dense particle clouds to characterise convective transport along material trajectories. By computing particle accelerations at the integration time step and controlling spectral element method signatures, we obtain robust acceleration statistics and recover Heisenberg-Yaglom behaviour. Lagrangian heat transfer is extremely intermittent: individual massless Lagrangian particles can carry convective heat fluxes up to $500$ times the global Eulerian mean, although higher-order heat flux moments decrease toward Gaussian values with increasing $Ra$. The analysis of velocity gradient invariants in the $Q$-$R$ plane along trajectories identifies a distinct topological footprint of dust-devil-like convective vortices in the quadrant of $Q>0$, $R<0$, associated with vortex stretching, plume detachment, and intense localised heat transfer. Global unconditioned pair dispersion exhibits neither extended Richardson nor Bolgiano-Obukhov scaling plateaus. Rather, scale-dependent eddy viscosity and conditioned PCA of dense particle clouds reveal that buoyancy- and shear-driven dispersion are temporally organised: rapid plume-driven ejection produces a short $t^5$-like episode, followed by sustained Richardson-like $t^3$-scaling. Thus, Lagrangian topology and cloud geometry provide mechanism-resolving diagnostics for active-scalar turbulence beyond RBC-specific global scaling laws.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22326 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lagrangian particle acceleration statistics. Probability density functions (PDFs) of the vertical ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evaluation of the Heisenberg-Yaglom constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lagrangian Nusselt number statistics. Probability density functions (PDFs) of the total Lagrangian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Parameter plane spanned by the invariants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Analysis of dust-devil-like convective vortices. (a) Projected trajectories ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of particle pair and single-particle dispersion. Relative particle pair dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scale-dependent Lagrangian eddy viscosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Geometric overview of particle clouds at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Geometric evolution of a representative particle cloud seeded in the mixing zone ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ensemble statistics of the temporal evolution of Lagrangian particle clouds. Ensemble averages [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cubic smoothing splines for Lagrangian particle accelerations at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum-enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling to model Lagrangian tracer dispersion in turbulent boundary layer

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    QE-MCMC with quantum-circuit proposals samples height-dependent turbulent accelerations for Lagrangian tracers, producing pair-dispersion scaling laws that match classical MCMC and stochastic models while showing larg...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Lohse, D

    Ahlers, G., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2009 Heat transfer and large scale dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 503--537

  2. [2]

    & Schumacher, J

    Alam, S., Krasnov, D., Pandey, A., Panickacheril John, J., Samuel, R.J., Vieweg, P.P. & Schumacher, J. 2025 Turbulent mesoscale convection in the Boussinesq limit and beyond. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 115, 109856

  3. [3]

    & Schumacher, J

    Badza, A., Froyland, G., Samuel, R.J. & Schumacher, J. 2026 Convective heat transfer patterns in plane-layer Rayleigh-B\'enard convection revealed by transient almost-invariant sets. Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023040

  4. [4]

    & Zenger, C

    Banerjee, S., Krahl, R., Durst, F. & Zenger, C. 2007 Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches. J. Turbul. 8, N32

  5. [5]

    & Mommert, M

    Barta, R., Volk, M.-C., Bauer, C., Wagner, C. & Mommert, M. 2025 Temperature and pressure reconstruction in turbulent Rayleigh–B\'enard convection by Lagrangian velocities using PINN. Meas. Sci. Technol. 36, 075304

  6. [6]

    & Schumacher, J

    Bhattacharya, S., Krasnov, D., Pandey, A., Gotoh, T. & Schumacher, J. 2026 Scale-resolved turbulent Prandtl number for Rayleigh–B\'enard convection at Pr = 10^ -3 . J. Fluid Mech. 1026, A6

  7. [7]

    & Roatsch, T

    Bickel, V.T., Almeida, M., Read, M., Schriever, A., Tirsch, D., Hauber, E., Gwinner, K., Thomas, N. & Roatsch, T. 2025 Dust devil migration patterns reveal strong near-surface winds across Mars. Sci. Adv. 11, eadw5170

  8. [8]

    2015 Turbulent pair dispersion as a ballistic cascade phenomenology

    Bourgoin, M. 2015 Turbulent pair dispersion as a ballistic cascade phenomenology. J. Fluid Mech. 772, 678--704

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    & Sreenivasan, K.R

    Buaria, D. & Sreenivasan, K.R. 2022 Scaling of acceleration statistics in high Reynolds number turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 234502

  2. [10]

    & Vulpiani, A

    Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Crisanti, A. & Vulpiani, A. 1999 Pair dispersion in synthetic fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 60, 6734--6741

  3. [11]

    & Sokolov, I.M

    Boffetta, G. & Sokolov, I.M. 2002 Statistics of two-particle dispersion in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 14, 3224--3232

  4. [12]

    1959 Turbulent spectra in a stably stratified atmosphere

    Bolgiano, R. 1959 Turbulent spectra in a stably stratified atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 64, 2226--2229

  5. [13]

    1903 Théorie Analytique de La Chaleur

    Boussinesq, J.V. 1903 Théorie Analytique de La Chaleur. vol. 2 (Gauthier-Villars)

  6. [14]

    & Lebedev, V

    Chertkov, M., Falkovich, G., Kolokolov, I. & Lebedev, V. 1995 Normal and anomalous scaling of the fourth-order correlation function of a randomly advected passive scalar. Phys. Rev. E 52, 4924--4941

  7. [15]

    & Shraiman, B.I

    Chertkov, M., Pumir, A. & Shraiman, B.I. 1999 Lagrangian tetrad dynamics and the phenomenology of turbulence. Phys. Fluids 11, 2394--2410

  8. [16]

    & Schumacher, J

    Chillà, F. & Schumacher, J. 2012 New perspectives in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 58

  9. [17]

    & Cantwell, B.J

    Chong, M.S., Perry, A.E. & Cantwell, B.J. 1990 A general classification of three‐dimensional flow fields. Phys. Fluids 2, 765--777

  10. [18]

    & Oliva, A

    Dabbagh, F., Trias, F.X., Gorobets, A. & Oliva, A. 2016 On the evolution of flow topology in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Phys. Fluids 28, 115105

  11. [19]

    & Padberg, K

    Dellnitz, M., Froyland, G., Horenkamp, C. & Padberg, K. 2009 On the approximation of transport phenomena a dynamical systems approach. GAMM-Mitt. 32, 47--60

  12. [20]

    2022 NekRS, a GPU-accelerated spectral element Navier–Stokes solver

    Fischer, P.F. 2022 NekRS, a GPU-accelerated spectral element Navier–Stokes solver. Parallel Comput. 114, 102982

  13. [21]

    & Pinton, J.-F

    Gasteuil, Y., Shew, W.L., Gibert, M., Chillà, F., Castaing, B. & Pinton, J.-F. 2007 Lagrangian temperature, velocity, and local heat flux measurement in Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 234302

  14. [22]

    & Kupiainen, A

    Gaw e dzki, K. & Kupiainen, A. 1995 Anomalous scaling of the passive scalar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3834--3837

  15. [23]

    & Raasch, S

    Giersch, S. & Raasch, S. 2021 Evolution and features of dust devil-like vortices in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection — A numerical study using direct numerical simulation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 126, 7

  16. [24]

    & Tuzhilina, E

    Greenacre, M., Groenen, P.J.F., Hastie, T., D'Enza, A.I., Markos, A. & Tuzhilina, E. 2022 Principal component analysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer 2, 100

  17. [25]

    2015 Lagrangian Coherent Structures

    Haller, G. 2015 Lagrangian Coherent Structures. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 137--162

  18. [26]

    1948 Zur statistichen Theorie der Turbulenz

    Heisenberg, W. 1948 Zur statistichen Theorie der Turbulenz. Z. Phys. 124, 628--657

  19. [27]

    2002 Scaling of acceleration in locally isotropic turbulence

    Hill, R.J. 2002 Scaling of acceleration in locally isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 452, 361--370

  20. [28]

    & Bodenschatz, E

    Jucha, J., Xu, H., Pumir, A. & Bodenschatz, E. 2014 Time-reversal-symmetry breaking in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 054501

  21. [29]

    & du Puits, R

    Kästner, C., Schneider, J.D. & du Puits, R. 2023 Evolution and features of dust devil-Like vortices in turbulent Rayleigh-B\'enard convection--An experimental study. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 128, e2022JD037466

  22. [30]

    1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers

    Kolmogorov, A.N. 1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301--304

  23. [31]

    & du Puits, R

    Lösch, A. & du Puits, R. 2021 The Barrel of Ilmenau: A large-scale convection experiment to study dust devil-like flow structures. Meteorol. Z. (Contrib. Atm. Sci.) 30, No.1, 89--97

  24. [32]

    & Shishkina, O

    Lohse, D. & Shishkina, O. 2024 Ultimate Rayleigh-Bénard turbulence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 035001

  25. [33]

    & Newman, G.R

    Lumley, J.L. & Newman, G.R. 1977 The return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 161--178

  26. [34]

    1978 Computational modeling of turbulent flows

    Lumley, J.L. 1978 Computational modeling of turbulent flows. Adv. Appl. Math. 18, 123--176

  27. [35]

    & Houze, R.A

    Mapes, B.E. & Houze, R.A. 1993 Cloud clusters and superclusters over the oceanic warm pool. Mon. Weather Rev. 121, 1398--1416

  28. [36]

    & Xia, K.-Q

    Ni, R., Huang, S.-D. & Xia, K.-Q. 2012 Lagrangian acceleration measurements in convective thermal turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 692, 395--419

  29. [37]

    1879 Ueber die Wärmeleitung der Flüssigkeiten bei Berücksichtigung der Strömungen infolge von Temperaturdifferenzen

    Oberbeck, A. 1879 Ueber die Wärmeleitung der Flüssigkeiten bei Berücksichtigung der Strömungen infolge von Temperaturdifferenzen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 243, 271--292

  30. [38]

    Obukhov, A. M. 1959 On influence of buoyancy forces on the structure of temperature field in a turbulent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 125, 1246--1248

  31. [39]

    Soria, J

    Ooi, A., Martin, J. Soria, J. & Chong, M.S. 1999 A study of the evolution and characteristics of the invariants of the velocity-gradient tensor in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 141--174

  32. [40]

    & Schumacher, J

    Pandey, A., Scheel, J.D. & Schumacher, J. 2018 Turbulent superstructures in Rayleigh-B\'enard convection. Nat. Commun. 9, 2118

  33. [41]

    2000 Turbulent Flows

    Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press

  34. [42]

    & Wilkinson, M

    Pumir, A. & Wilkinson, M. 2011 Orientation statistics of small particles in turbulence. New J. Phys. 13, 093030

  35. [43]

    1916 On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid, when the higher temperature is on the under side

    Rayleigh, L. 1916 On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid, when the higher temperature is on the under side. Lond. Edinburgh Dublin Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 32, 529--546

  36. [44]

    1926 Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph

    Richardson, L.F. 1926 Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 110, 709--737

  37. [45]

    & Schumacher, J

    Samuel, R.J., Bode, M., Scheel, J.D., Sreenivasan, K.R. & Schumacher, J. 2024 No sustained mean velocity in the boundary region of plane thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 996, A49

  38. [46]

    & Schumacher, J

    Samuel, R.J. & Schumacher, J. 2025 Plane-layer Rayleigh–B\'enard convection up to =10^ 11 : near-wall fluctuations and role of initial conditions. Fluid Dyn. Res. 57, 061401

  39. [47]

    M., Bodenschatz, E

    Sawford, B.L., Yeung, P.K., Borgas, M.S., Vedula, P., La Porta, A., Crawford, A. M., Bodenschatz, E. 2003 Conditional and unconditional acceleration statistics in turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 3478–-3489

  40. [48]

    & Schumacher, J

    Scheel, J.D., Emran, M.S. & Schumacher, J. 2013 Resolving the fine-scale structure in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. New J. Phys. 15, 113063

  41. [49]

    2008 Lagrangian dispersion and heat transport in convective turbulence

    Schumacher, J. 2008 Lagrangian dispersion and heat transport in convective turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 134502

  42. [50]

    2009 Lagrangian studies in convective turbulence

    Schumacher, J. 2009 Lagrangian studies in convective turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 79, 056301

  43. [51]

    & Sreenivasan, K.R

    Schumacher, J. & Sreenivasan, K.R. 2020 Colloquium: Unusual dynamics of convection in the Sun. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 041001

  44. [52]

    & Schumacher, J

    Schneide, C., Pandey, A., Padberg-Gehle, K. & Schumacher, J. 2018 Probing turbulent superstructures in Rayleigh-Bénard convection by Lagrangian trajectory clusters. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 113501

  45. [53]

    & Padberg-Gehle, K

    Schneide, C., Vieweg, P.P., Schumacher, J. & Padberg-Gehle, K. 2022 Evolutionary clustering of Lagrangian trajectories in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection flows. Chaos 32, 013123

  46. [54]

    & Schumacher, J

    Shevkar, P.P., Samuel, R.J., Cierpka, C. & Schumacher, J. 2025 Three-dimensional velocity gradient statistics in a mesoscale convection laboratory experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 1024, A47

  47. [55]

    & Sreenivasan, K.R

    Shevkar, P.P., Samuel, R.J., Zinchenko, G., Bode, M., Schumacher, J. & Sreenivasan, K.R. 2025 Hierarchical network of thermal plumes and their dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh–B\'enard convection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2502972122

  48. [56]

    & Siggia, E.D

    Shraiman, B.I. & Siggia, E.D. 1998 Anomalous scaling for a passive scalar near the Batchelor limit. Phys. Rev. E 57, 2965--2977

  49. [57]

    2018 Turbulent mixing: A perspective

    Sreenivasan, K.R. 2018 Turbulent mixing: A perspective. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18175--18183

  50. [58]

    & Verzicco, R

    Stevens, R.J.A.M., Lohse, D. & Verzicco, R. 2011 Prandtl and Rayleigh number dependence of heat transport in high Rayleigh number thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 31--43

  51. [59]

    & Lohse, D

    Stevens, R.J.A.M., Blass, A., Zhu, X., Verzicco, R. & Lohse, D. 2018 Turbulent thermal superstructures in Rayleigh-B\'enard convection. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 041501(R)

  52. [60]

    1921 Diffusion by continuous movements

    Taylor, G.I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2(20), 196--212

  53. [61]

    & Verma, M.K

    Tiwari, H.,Sharma, L. & Verma, M.K. 2025 On the absence of the ultimate regime in turbulent thermal convection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2513474122

  54. [62]

    & Bodenschatz, E

    Toschi, F. & Bodenschatz, E. 2009 Lagrangian properties of particles in turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 375--404

  55. [63]

    2018 Physics of buoyant flows: From instabilities to turbulence

    Verma, M.K. 2018 Physics of buoyant flows: From instabilities to turbulence. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore

  56. [64]

    1982 Local interaction between vorticity and shear in a perfect incompressible fluid

    Vieillefosse, P. 1982 Local interaction between vorticity and shear in a perfect incompressible fluid. J. Phys 43, (6) 837--842

  57. [65]

    P., Klünker, A., Schumacher, J

    Vieweg, P. P., Klünker, A., Schumacher, J. & Padberg-Gehle, K. 2024 Lagrangian studies of coherent sets and heat transport in constant heat flux-driven turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluids 103, 69--85

  58. [66]

    & Bosbach, J

    Weiss, S., Schanz, D., Erdogdu, A.O., Schröder, A. & Bosbach, J. 2024 On Lagrangian properties of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 999, A90

  59. [67]

    & Boffetta, G

    Xu, H., Pumir, A., Falkovich, G., Bodenschatz, E., Shats, M., Xia, H., Francois, N. & Boffetta, G. 2014 Flight–crash events in turbulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(21), 7558--7563

  60. [68]

    Yaglom, A. M. 1949 On the acceleration field in a turbulent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 67(5), 795--798

  61. [69]

    Yeung, P. K. 2002 Lagrangian investigations of turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 115--142

  62. [70]

    & Read, P

    Young, R. & Read, P. 2017 Forward and inverse kinetic energy cascades in Jupiter’s turbulent weather layer. Nat. Phys. 13, 1135--1140

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.