Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 81 references

A hybrid CV-DV interferometer with one qubit ancilla suppresses thermal and Gaussian displacement noise on any bosonic code from linear to quadratic scaling.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-30 13:09 UTC pith:6QXC5JJO

load-bearing objection The paper claims a code-agnostic hybrid protocol turns linear bosonic noise quadratic via two ideal CF gates around the channel, but the math and gate-noise robustness are not shown. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.24540 v1 pith:6QXC5JJO submitted 2026-05-23 quant-ph

Code-agnostic bosonic noise suppression with hybrid rotations

Saurabh U. Shringarpure , Siheon Park , Sungjoo Cho , Yong Siah Teo , Hyukjoon Kwon , Srikrishna Omkar , Hyunseok Jeong This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords bosonic codesnoise suppressionhybrid CV-DV systemscontrolled Fourier gatesquantum error mitigationcontinuous-variable quantum informationthermal noiseGaussian displacement noise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that sandwiching a noise channel between two controlled-Fourier gates controlled by a qubit ancilla reduces the leading-order effect of thermal or displacement noise on single-mode bosonic encodings from linear in the loss rate to quadratic. The protocol requires no active error correction and no measurement of the encoded state itself. It preserves success probability at or above one half whenever the product of loss and gain parameters stays at or below one half. With additional ancillas the same structure converts photon loss into coherent Fock damping and turns thermal or displacement noise into Fock-diagonal mixtures. The construction works for arbitrary bosonic codes and simplifies to standard parity checks only for the special case of rotation-symmetric codes.

Core claim

For any single-mode bosonic code corrupted by thermal or Gaussian displacement noise at loss rate μ and amplification G, a hybrid continuous-discrete-variable interferometer using a single qubit ancilla and two controlled-Fourier gates sandwiching the noise channel suppresses its effects from linear to quadratic scaling without active error correction or destructive measurements of the encoded state, maintaining high success probabilities ≥0.5 when μG ≤0.5.

What carries the argument

The hybrid CV-DV interferometer formed by a qubit ancilla and two controlled-Fourier gates placed on either side of the noise channel.

Load-bearing premise

The controlled-Fourier gates can be applied perfectly without introducing extra noise on the ancilla or the bosonic mode, and the input noise consists only of the stated thermal or Gaussian displacement models at the given rates.

What would settle it

Apply the two controlled-Fourier gates with the ancilla to a known bosonic code state, let thermal or displacement noise act in the middle, then measure the output noise variance or logical error rate as a function of μG; quadratic rather than linear growth confirms the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • With multiple ancillas the protocol converts photon loss into coherent Fock-damping and thermal or displacement noise into a mixture of Fock-diagonal noise.
  • For 2^K-fold rotation-symmetric bosonic codes the protocol reduces to conventional error detection and projection using K ancillas.
  • Extending the ancilla to a qutrit yields resilience against both CV noise and composite DV damping noise even on encodings without a well-defined photon-number parity syndrome.
  • The scheme uses only simple gates and few ancillas, avoiding the ancilla-noise vulnerability of bypass schemes that transfer quantum information to DV registers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sandwich structure may be testable on existing continuous-variable hardware by calibrating the controlled-Fourier operation on a single bosonic mode plus qubit.
  • If the gates remain high-fidelity, the quadratic suppression could be stacked with existing bosonic error-correction layers to reduce the overhead of the latter.
  • The conversion of loss into Fock damping suggests a route to deterministic preparation of approximate code states by post-selecting on the ancilla.
  • Generalization to multi-mode channels would require commuting controlled-Fourier operations across modes but could protect distributed bosonic encodings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for any single-mode bosonic code subject to thermal or Gaussian displacement noise (loss rate μ, amplification G), a hybrid CV-DV interferometer with one qubit ancilla and two controlled-Fourier gates placed around the noise channel suppresses the noise effects from linear to quadratic scaling in μG. The protocol requires no active error correction or destructive measurements of the encoded state, achieves success probabilities ≥0.5 when μG≤0.5, is entirely code-agnostic, converts loss into Fock-damping with multiple ancillas, and extends to a qutrit ancilla for resilience against composite DV damping noise. For 2^K-fold rotation-symmetric codes it reduces to conventional error detection.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result is significant for hardware-efficient bosonic noise suppression. It provides a clear advantage over bypass schemes by retaining information in the CV mode and using only simple gates with few ancillas. The code-agnostic construction, the explicit conversion of noise types, and the qutrit extension are notable strengths that broaden applicability without requiring code-specific syndromes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Protocol derivation] The derivation of linear-term cancellation (main text, protocol section following the definition of the hybrid interferometer) assumes ideal controlled-Fourier gates that introduce zero additional noise on the ancilla or bosonic mode. No quantitative robustness analysis is provided for finite gate fidelity or ancilla decoherence during gate application; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed quadratic scaling.
  2. [Success probability analysis] The success-probability bound ≥0.5 for μG≤0.5 is asserted without an explicit expression or plot showing the probability as a function of μ and G (or a table of numerical values); verification of this bound is needed to support the practical-utility claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title refers to 'hybrid rotations' while the text consistently uses 'controlled-Fourier gates'; a brief clarification of the relationship would improve consistency.
  2. [Qutrit extension] In the qutrit-ancilla extension, the definition of the qutrit basis states and the composite noise model could be stated more explicitly to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Protocol derivation] The derivation of linear-term cancellation (main text, protocol section following the definition of the hybrid interferometer) assumes ideal controlled-Fourier gates that introduce zero additional noise on the ancilla or bosonic mode. No quantitative robustness analysis is provided for finite gate fidelity or ancilla decoherence during gate application; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed quadratic scaling.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation assumes ideal controlled-Fourier gates, which is a standard idealization in theoretical analyses of noise-suppression protocols to isolate the effect of the hybrid interferometer. The quadratic scaling follows directly from this assumption. In revision we will explicitly flag the ideal-gate assumption in the protocol section and add a concise discussion noting that small gate errors introduce higher-order perturbations but do not restore the leading linear term for sufficiently high fidelity. A full quantitative numerical study of ancilla decoherence during gate execution lies outside the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Success probability analysis] The success-probability bound ≥0.5 for μG≤0.5 is asserted without an explicit expression or plot showing the probability as a function of μ and G (or a table of numerical values); verification of this bound is needed to support the practical-utility claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The success probability is the probability that the ancilla qubit is measured in the |+⟩ state after the second controlled-Fourier gate and admits an analytic expression in terms of the thermal/displacement noise parameters μ and G. In the revised manuscript we will supply this explicit formula together with a plot (or table) confirming that the probability remains ≥0.5 for all μG≤0.5, thereby substantiating the practical-utility statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation is an independent gate-based construction

full rationale

The paper constructs a hybrid CV-DV protocol that places two controlled-Fourier gates around a thermal or Gaussian displacement noise channel acting on an arbitrary single-mode bosonic code. The claimed linear-to-quadratic suppression follows from the explicit unitary action of those ideal gates on the joint system; the abstract and description contain no fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions, no self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled from prior work. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the protocol rests on standard quantum optics assumptions for gates and noise channels with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities explicitly introduced beyond the described CF gates and ancilla.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Controlled-Fourier gates can be realized ideally without extra noise.
    The suppression relies on these gates sandwiching the noise channel perfectly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5823 in / 1287 out tokens · 39196 ms · 2026-06-30T13:09:48.705899+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Physical-level noise on traveling bosonic modes remains a critical bottleneck for scalable quantum information processing. We show that for any single-mode bosonic code (qumode) corrupted by thermal or Gaussian displacement noise at loss rate $\mu$ and amplification $G$, a hybrid continuous-discrete-variable (CV-DV) interferometer using a single qubit ancilla and two controlled-Fourier (CF) gates sandwiching the noise channel suppresses its effects from linear to quadratic scaling. This is achieved without active error correction or destructive measurements of the encoded state, maintaining high success probabilities $\geq 0.5$ when $\mu G \leq 0.5$. When supplemented with multiple ancillas, the protocol converts photon loss into coherent Fock-damping, and thermal or displacement noise into a mixture of Fock-diagonal noise. The protocol is entirely code-agnostic. For the special case of $2^K$-fold rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, it simplifies to conventional error detection and projection with $K$ ancillas. Suppression with simple gates and few ancillas demonstrates a clear hardware-efficient advantage over previously proposed ``bypass'' schemes, where quantum information transferred to the DV ancillas is readily corrupted by ancilla noise. Finally, we extend the protocol to a qutrit DV ancilla. This demonstrates resilience to both CV noise and composite DV damping noise, achieving a truly hybrid noise suppression scheme that operates effectively even on CV encodings lacking a well-defined photon-number parity syndrome.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24540 by Hyukjoon Kwon, Hyunseok Jeong, Saurabh U. Shringarpure, Siheon Park, Srikrishna Omkar, Sungjoo Cho, Yong Siah Teo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bosonic noise suppression with (a) conditional rota [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Multiqubit extension for converting thermal or Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Average suppression performances as a function of the pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of average suppression performance with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Average infidelity of the eigenstates of the single-qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison between using conditional Fouriers and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The CF-gate-only interferometer requires no informa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Qutrit-based suppression using Pauli rotations embedded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Comparison between qubit-based ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The like parity codes are also resilient to the composite amplitude and phase damping ancilla noise in quantum communication. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Haroche and D

    S. Haroche and D. Kleppner, Cavity quantum electrodynamics, Physics Today42, 24 (1989)

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quan- tum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 565 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Wallraff, D

    A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature431, 162 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for supercon- ducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum com- putation, Phys. Rev. A69, 062320 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, E. Holland, S. Krastanov, V . V . Al- bert, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity state manipulation using photon-number selective phase gates, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 137002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Krastanov, V

    S. Krastanov, V . V . Albert, C. Shen, C.-L. Zou, R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, and L. Jiang, Universal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A92, 040303 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quan- tum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    D. Lv, S. An, Z. Liu, J.-N. Zhang, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and K. Kim, Quantum simulation of the quantum rabi model in a trapped ion, Phys. Rev. X8, 021027 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Xiang, S

    Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quan- tum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 623 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    U. L. Andersen, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, P. Van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum information, Nature Physics11, 713 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    V . V . Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, D. J. Young, R. T. Brierley, P. Reinhold, C. Vuillot, L. Li, C. Shen, S. M. Girvin, B. M. Terhal, and L. Jiang, Performance and structure of single- mode bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. A97, 032346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Joshi, K

    A. Joshi, K. Noh, and Y . Y . Gao, Quantum information process- ing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED, Quantum Science and Technology6, 033001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 120501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, M. H. Devoret, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. Mirrahimi, Deterministic protocol for map- ping a qubit to coherent state superpositions in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A87, 042315 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    N. Ofek, A. Petrenko, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, Y . Liu, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang,et al., Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits, Nature536, 441 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    V . V . Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsioutsios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. Brock, A. Ding, L. Frunzio,et al., Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even, Nature 616, 50 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Z. Ni, S. Li, X. Deng, Y . Cai, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Z.-B. Yang, H. Yu, F. Yan, S. Liu,et al., Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit, Nature616, 56 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, V . V . Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf,et al., Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature584, 368 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V . Sivak, A. Z. Ding, S. S. Elder, S. R. Jha, J. Venkatraman, B. Royer, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nature Physics18, 1464 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Y . Y . Gao, M. A. Rol, S. Touzard, and C. Wang, Practical guide for building superconducting quantum devices, PRX quantum 2, 040202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    Reiserer,A Controlled Phase Gate Between a Single Atom and an Optical Photon(Springer, 2015)

    A. Reiserer,A Controlled Phase Gate Between a Single Atom and an Optical Photon(Springer, 2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Hacker, S

    B. Hacker, S. Welte, S. Daiss, A. Shaukat, S. Ritter, L. Li, and G. Rempe, Deterministic creation of entangled atom–light Schr¨odinger-cat states, Nature Photonics13, 110 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Omkar, Y

    S. Omkar, Y . S. Teo, S.-W. Lee, and H. Jeong, Highly photon- loss-tolerant quantum computing using hybrid qubits, Phys. Rev. A103, 032602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Q. Xu, P. Zeng, D. Xu, and L. Jiang, Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete-variable ancillae, Phys. Rev. X14, 031016 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Y . Liu, S. Singh, K. C. Smith, E. Crane, J. M. Martyn, A. Eick- busch, A. Schuckert, R. D. Li, J. Sinanan-Singh, M. B. Soley, T. Tsunoda, I. L. Chuang, N. Wiebe, and S. M. Girvin, Hybrid oscillator-qubit quantum processors: Instruction set architec- tures, abstract machine models, and applications, PRX Quan- tum7, 010201 (2026)

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    J. Lee, S. Omkar, Y . S. Teo, S.-H. Lee, H. Kwon, M. Kim, and H. Jeong, Photonic hybrid quantum computing, Newton (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    M. Kang, W. Chen, H. Kwon, K. Kim, and J. Huh, Doubling qubits in a trapped-ion system via vibrational dual-rail encoding, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12937 10.48550/arXiv.2505.12937 (2025). 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12937 2025

  30. [30]

    Omkar, Y

    S. Omkar, Y . S. Teo, and H. Jeong, Resource-efficient topolog- ical fault-tolerant quantum computation with hybrid entangle- ment of light, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    J. Lee, N. Kang, S.-H. Lee, H. Jeong, L. Jiang, and S.-W. Lee, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons, PRX Quantum5, 030322 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Kurpiers, P

    P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y . Salath´e, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse,et al., Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    C. J. Axline, L. D. Burkhart, W. Pfaff, M. Zhang, K. Chou, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, P. Reinhold, L. Frunzio, S. Girvin, L. Jiang,et al., On-demand quantum state transfer and entan- glement between remote microwave cavity memories, Nature Physics14, 705 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Xiang, M

    Z.-L. Xiang, M. Zhang, L. Jiang, and P. Rabl, Intracity quantum communication via thermal microwave networks, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011035 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Vermersch, P.-O

    B. Vermersch, P.-O. Guimond, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum state transfer via noisy photonic and phononic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 133601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    J. Qiu, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Zhang, Y . Zhou, X. Sun, J. Zhang, X. Linpeng, S. Liu, J. Niu,et al., A thermal-noise-resilient mi- crowave quantum network up to 4 K, Nature Electronics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    K. Park, J. Hastrup, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, J. B. Brask, R. Filip, and U. L. Andersen, Slowing quantum decoherence of oscillators by hybrid processing, npj Quantum Information 8, 67 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Taylor, G

    A. Taylor, G. Bressanini, H. Kwon, and M. S. Kim, Quantum error cancellation in photonic systems: Undoing photon losses, Phys. Rev. A110, 022622 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Y . S. Teo, S. U. Shringarpure, S. Cho, and H. Jeong, Linear- optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems, Quantum Science and Technology10, 035003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Takagi, S

    R. Takagi, S. Endo, S. Minagawa, and M. Gu, Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation, npj Quantum Information8, 114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Z. Cai, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, W. J. Huggins, Y . Li, J. R. McClean, and T. E. O’Brien, Quantum error mitiga- tion, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Y . Quek, D. Stilck Franc ¸a, S. Khatri, J. J. Meyer, and J. Eisert, Exponentially tighter bounds on limitations of quantum error mitigation, Nature Physics20, 1648 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Le Jeannic, A

    H. Le Jeannic, A. Cavaill `es, K. Huang, R. Filip, and J. Lau- rat, Slowing quantum decoherence by squeezing in phase space, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 073603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    R. A. Brewster, T. B. Pittman, and J. D. Franson, Reduced de- coherence using squeezing, amplification, and antisqueezing, Phys. Rev. A98, 033818 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V . Savona, Quantum error cor- rection using squeezed Schr ¨odinger cat states, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    X. Pan, J. Schwinger, N.-N. Huang, P. Song, W. Chua, F. Hana- mura, A. Joshi, F. Valadares, R. Filip, and Y . Y . Gao, Protecting the quantum interference of cat states by phase-space compres- sion, Phys. Rev. X13, 021004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Enhancing dissipative cat qubit protection by squeezing

    R. Rousseau, D. Ruiz, E. Albertinale, P. d’Avezac, D. Banys, U. Blandin, N. Bourdaud, G. Campanaro, G. Cardoso, N. Cottet,et al., Enhancing dissipative cat qubit pro- tection by squeezing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07892 10.48550/arXiv.2502.07892 (2025)

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07892 2025

  48. [48]

    Srikanth and S

    R. Srikanth and S. Banerjee, Squeezed generalized amplitude damping channel, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 012318 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Omkar, R

    S. Omkar, R. Srikanth, and S. Banerjee, Dissipative and non- dissipative single-qubit channels: dynamics and geometry, Quantum information processing12, 3725 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Provazn ´ık, P

    J. Provazn ´ık, P. Marek, J. Laurat, and R. Filip, Adapting coherent-state superpositions in noisy channels, Optics Express 33, 16520 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    T. C. Ralph, Quantum error correction of continuous-variable states against Gaussian noise, Phys. Rev. A84, 022339 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    Mi ˇcuda, I

    M. Mi ˇcuda, I. Straka, M. Mikov ´a, M. Du ˇsek, N. J. Cerf, J. Fiur´aˇsek, and M. Je ˇzek, Noiseless loss suppression in quan- tum optical communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 180503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A quantum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom, Na- ture508, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Li and P

    P.-Z. Li and P. van Loock, Memoryless quantum repeaters based on cavity-QED and coherent states, Advanced Quantum Tech- nologies6, 2200151 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    P.-Z. Li, J. Dias, W. J. Munro, P. van Loock, K. Nemoto, and N. Lo Piparo, Performance of rotation-symmetric bosonic codes in a quantum repeater network, Advanced Quantum Technologies7, 2300252 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    I. C. Nodurft, R. A. Brewster, T. B. Pittman, and J. D. Fran- son, Optical attenuation without absorption, Phys. Rev. A100, 013850 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    L. Sun, A. Petrenko, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, K. Sliwa, A. Narla, M. Hatridge, S. Shankar, J. Blumoff,et al., Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements, Nature511, 444 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Rosenblum, P

    S. Rosenblum, P. Reinhold, M. Mirrahimi, L. Jiang, L. Frun- zio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error, Science361, 266 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Gisin, N

    N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Error filtra- tion and entanglement purification for quantum communica- tion, Phys. Rev. A72, 012338 (2005)

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    J. S. Ivan, K. K. Sabapathy, and R. Simon, Operator-sum rep- resentation for bosonic Gaussian channels, Phys. Rev. A84, 042311 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    C. N. Gagatsos, B. A. Bash, S. Guha, and A. Datta, Bounding the quantum limits of precision for phase estimation with loss and thermal noise, Phys. Rev. A96, 062306 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    K. Noh, V . V . Albert, and L. Jiang, Quantum capacity bounds of Gaussian thermal loss channels and achievable rates with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, IEEE Transactions on Infor- mation Theory65, 2563 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    Gonzales, D

    A. Gonzales, D. Dilley, B. Li, L. Jiang, and Z. H. Saleem, De- tecting errors in a quantum network with pauli checks, Phys. Rev. A111, 052629 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    A. W. Harrow, The church of the symmetric subspace, arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.6595 10.48550/arXiv.1308.6595 (2013)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.6595 2013

  66. [66]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to Haar measure tools in quantum in- formation: A beginner’s tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quantum com- puting with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macroscop- ically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Phys. Rev. A59, 2631 (1999). 13

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    Jeong and M

    H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, Efficient quantum computation using coherent states, Phys. Rev. A65, 042305 (2002)

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Quantum computation with optical coherent states, Phys. Rev. A68, 042319 (2003)

    work page 2003

  71. [71]

    S. U. Shringarpure, Y . S. Teo, and H. Jeong, Error suppres- sion in multicomponent cat codes with photon subtraction and teleamplification, Optics Express32, 20719 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V . V . Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin, New class of quan- tum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode, Phys. Rev. X6, 031006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    S. Bose, J. Singh, A. Cabello, and H. Jeong, Long-distance en- tanglement sharing using hybrid states of discrete and continu- ous variables, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 064013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Z.-J. Chen, W. Cai, L.-X. Xie, Q.-X. Jie, X.-B. Zou, G.-C. Guo, L. Sun, and C.-L. Zou, Fault-tolerant preparation of arbitrary logical states in the cat code, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17438 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17438 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.17438 2026

  76. [76]

    S. Endo, Y . Suzuki, K. Tsubouchi, R. Asaoka, K. Yamamoto, Y . Matsuzaki, and Y . Tokunaga, Quantum error mitigation for rotation-symmetric bosonic codes with symmetry expansion, Phys. Rev. A111, 062402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Hastrup, K

    J. Hastrup, K. Park, J. B. Brask, R. Filip, and U. L. Ander- sen, Universal unitary transfer of continuous-variable quantum states into a few qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 110503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    W. J. Munro, A. M. Stephens, S. J. Devitt, K. A. Harrison, and K. Nemoto, Quantum communication without the necessity of quantum memories, Nature Photonics6, 777 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Ritter, C

    S. Ritter, C. N ¨olleke, C. Hahn, A. Reiserer, A. Neuzner, M. Up- hoff, M. M¨ucke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, and G. Rempe, An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities, Nature484, 195 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Horodecki, M

    R. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and P. Horodecki, Teleportation, bell’s inequalities and inseparability, Phys. Lett. A222, 21 (1996). Appendix A: Success probability Here we analyze the success probability of single mode thermal or Gaussian random displacement noise suppression using multiple ancilla from the main text, given as psucc = tr ρB G xa†a X l,k≥0 y...

    work page 1996

Showing first 80 references.