Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 146 references

Symmetry and integrability in the anyon-Hubbard model

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two anyons in the anyon-Hubbard model are integrable only under periodic boundary conditions.

desk verdict Two anyons are integrable under periodic but not open boundaries, with symmetry classes switching by size, particle number, and boundaries. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28956 v1 pith:6NMIHR3U submitted 2026-05-27 cond-mat.quant-gas math-phmath.MPquant-ph

Martin Bonkhoff , Grennon Gurney , Friethjof Theel , Peter Schmelcher , Nathan L. Harshman , Thore Posske This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords anyon-Hubbardmodelintegrabilitysymmetryclassesboundaryconditionsone-dimensionalanyonsspectraldegeneraciescoldatomsdoublonstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the anyon-Hubbard model for one-dimensional particles with tunable statistics exhibits symmetries that switch among classes AI, BDI, and CI according to system size, particle number, and boundary conditions. It shows that two anyons become integrable with periodic boundaries but lose integrability with open boundaries, yielding exact solutions for a doublon state hidden in scattering states and for the nullspace of noninteracting anyons. These features resolve spectral signatures across the full range of limits from interacting bosons to pseudofermions. A sympathetic reader would care because the distinctions directly shape the energy levels and degeneracies observable in cold-atom realizations of anyons.

What carries the argument

The anyon-Hubbard Hamiltonian with a statistics parameter and either periodic or open boundary conditions, whose symmetries and integrability determine the spectrum.

What would settle it

Measure the energy spectrum of two anyons in a finite chain: under periodic boundaries the levels must exhibit the degeneracies required by integrability, while under open boundaries those degeneracies must be absent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The anyon-Hubbard Hamiltonian of finite length displays a switching between symmetry classes AI, BDI, and CI that depends on system size, particle number, and boundary conditions; two anyons are integrable with periodic boundaries but not with open boundaries; the model admits an exactly solvable doublon state within the continuum and an exact nullspace solution for two noninteracting anyons; all limits, including bosons and pseudofermions, are analyzed for their spectral properties.

Load-bearing premise

The anyon-Hubbard Hamiltonian with the chosen boundary conditions and statistics parameter captures the low-energy physics of the anyons realized in the cold-atom experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spectrum of two anyons under periodic boundaries contains degeneracies fixed by the symmetry class.
  • Limits to bosons and to pseudofermions each produce characteristic, fully solvable spectra.
  • A doublon bound state remains exactly solvable even when embedded in the scattering continuum.
  • The nullspace of two noninteracting anyons admits an exact closed-form solution.
  • Symmetry class determines which states are accessible or protected in finite-size systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The boundary-condition dependence of integrability may allow experiments to switch between chaotic and regular dynamics by changing trap geometry.
  • The exact doublon solution could be used as a benchmark for numerical methods applied to larger particle numbers.
  • Symmetry switching with particle number suggests that adding more anyons may restore or destroy integrability in a predictable pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the symmetries, integrability, and degeneracies of the finite-size anyon-Hubbard model. It reports a switching between symmetry classes AI, BDI, and CI that depends on system size, particle number, and boundary conditions. Central results include the integrability of two anyons under periodic boundary conditions (but not open), an exactly solvable doublon state embedded in the scattering continuum, the exact nullspace solution for two noninteracting anyons, and a resolution of spectral signatures across the interacting-boson and pseudofermion limits.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies concrete, parameter-free results on symmetry-class switching and exact solvability for a model directly tied to recent cold-atom realizations of 1D anyons. The identification of boundary-dependent integrability and hidden exact states offers falsifiable predictions for finite-system spectra and degeneracies that experiments can test.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that two anyons with periodic boundaries are integrable while those with open boundaries are not; a brief statement in the main text clarifying whether this distinction survives the two-body reduction or requires the full many-body Hilbert space would aid readability.
  2. Notation for the statistics parameter and the precise implementation of periodic versus open boundary conditions (e.g., how the anyonic phase is incorporated into the hopping terms) should be introduced once in a dedicated paragraph rather than piecemeal across sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The report contains no enumerated major comments, so we provide no point-by-point rebuttals below. We remain ready to incorporate any minor clarifications or corrections once they are specified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives symmetry classes (AI/BDI/CI), integrability distinctions (PBC vs OBC for two anyons), and exact solutions (doublon state, nullspace) directly from the anyon-Hubbard Hamiltonian operators, finite-size spectrum, and boundary conditions. These are internal mathematical statements obtained by solving the model's Schrödinger equation and identifying conserved quantities, with no reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The model limits (bosons, pseudofermions) are analyzed as special cases of the same Hamiltonian without circular renaming or smuggling of ansatze.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger left empty pending full text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry and integrability in the anyon-Hubbard model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6NMIHR3U

@misc{pith2026260528956,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry and integrability in the anyon-Hubbard model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6NMIHR3U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28956}
}
read the original abstract

Recent cold atom experiments have realized one-dimensional anyons and enabled the tuning of 1D~statistics between bosons and fermions. Here, we analyze the symmetries, integrability, and resulting degeneracies of the underlying anyon-Hubbard model of finite length. Our results reveal a switching between symmetry classes AI, BDI, and CI in dependence on system size, particle number, and boundary conditions, and show that two anyons with periodic boundaries are integrable, while two anyons with open boundary conditions are not. We include a comprehensive analysis of all model limits, especially of interacting bosons and pseudofermions and resolve spectral signatures. We additionally reveal an exactly solvable doublon state that hides in the continuum of scattering states and the exact solution of the nullspace of two noninteracting anyons. The uncovered symmetries shape the fundamental properties of the one-dimensional anyons at hand, and the predicted states are accessible in state-of-the-art experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28956 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The anyon-Hubbard model describes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The two-particle anyon-Hubbard model’s integrability depends on its parameters and boundary conditions. (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Im(k 1) = 0 = Im(k2),(67)

  2. [2]

    Re(k 1),= 0 = Re(k 2),(68)

  3. [3]

    CUI: Advanced Imaging of Matter

    Im(k 1,2),= 0 = Re(k 2,1),(69) 4)k ∗ 1 =k 2.(70) Physically, these choices correspond to different scenarios of bound and dispersive behavior, a distinction that only 11 becomes unambiguous in the thermodynamic limitL→ ∞[62, 64, 114, 130, 132, 133], where the scattering states become continuous and bound states can emerge at the edges of this continuum [6...

  4. [4]

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Real- ization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statis- tical phase, Science386, 1055 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    G. T. Horowitz, Exactly soluble diffeomorphism invari- ant theories, Commun. Math. Phys.125, 417 (1989)

    1989

  6. [6]

    Fr¨ olian, C

    A. Fr¨ olian, C. S. Chisholm, E. Neri, C. R. Cabrera, R. Ramos, A. Celi, and L. Tarruell, Realizing a 1D topo- logical gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC, Nature 608, 293 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    B. Wang, A. Vashisht, Y. Guo, S. Dhar, M. Landini, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and N. Goldman, Anyonization of bosons in one dimension: An effective swap model (2025), arXiv:2504.21208

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Y. Zeng, A. Bastianello, S. Dhar, Z. Wang, X. Yu, M. Horvath, G. E. Astrakharchik, Y. Guo, H.-C. N¨ agerl, and M. Landini, Realization of fractional Fermi seas (2026), arXiv:2602.17657 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    Bakkali-Hassani, J

    B. Bakkali-Hassani, J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, I. Tes- faye, G. Valent´ ı-Rojas, A. Eckardt, and M. Greiner, Re- vealing Pseudo-Fermionization and Chiral Binding of 14 One-Dimensional Anyons using Adiabatic State Prepa- ration (2026), arXiv:2602.20421 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2026

  2. [10]

    C. S. Chisholm, A. Fr¨ olian, E. Neri, R. Ramos, L. Tar- ruell, and A. Celi, Encoding a one-dimensional topo- logical gauge theory in a Raman-coupled Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043088 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Keilmann, S

    T. Keilmann, S. Lanzmich, I. McCulloch, and M. Roncaglia, Statistically induced phase transitions and anyons in 1D optical lattices, Nat. Commun.2, 361 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Greschner, G

    S. Greschner, G. Sun, D. Poletti, and L. Santos, Density-Dependent Synthetic Gauge Fields Using Peri- odically Modulated Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 215303 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Greschner and L

    S. Greschner and L. Santos, Anyon Hubbard model in one-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 053002 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Str¨ ater, S

    C. Str¨ ater, S. C. L. Srivastava, and A. Eckardt, Floquet Realization and Signatures of One-Dimensional Anyons in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Greschner, L

    S. Greschner, L. Cardarelli, and L. Santos, Probing the exchange statistics of one-dimensional anyon models, Phys. Rev. A97, 053605 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    S. Dhar, B. Wang, M. Horvath, A. Vashisht, Y. Zeng, M. B. Zvonarev, N. Goldman, Y. Guo, M. Landini, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas, Nature642, 53 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Nagies, B

    S. Nagies, B. Wang, A. C. Knapp, A. Eckardt, and N. L. Harshman, Beyond braid statistics: Constructing a lat- tice model for anyons with exchange statistics intrinsic to one dimension, SciPost Phys.16, 086 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Kundu, Exact Solution of Double delta Function Bose Gas through an Interacting Anyon Gas, Phys

    A. Kundu, Exact Solution of Double delta Function Bose Gas through an Interacting Anyon Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1275 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    Bonkhoff, K

    M. Bonkhoff, K. J¨ agering, S. Eggert, A. Pelster, M. Thorwart, and T. Posske, Bosonic Continuum The- ory of One-Dimensional Lattice Anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 163201 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    O. I. Patu, V. E. Korepin, and D. V. Averin, Correla- tion functions of one-dimensional Lieb–Liniger anyons, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.40, 14963 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    M. T. Batchelor, X.-W. Guan, and N. Oelkers, One- Dimensional Interacting Anyon Gas: Low-Energy Prop- erties and Haldane Exclusion Statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 210402 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Aglietti, L

    U. Aglietti, L. Griguolo, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi, and D. Seminara, Anyons and chiral solitons on a line, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4406 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Posske, B

    T. Posske, B. Trauzettel, and M. Thorwart, Second quantization of Leinaas-Myrheim anyons in one dimen- sion and their relation to the Lieb-Liniger model, Phys. Rev. B96, 195422 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    N. L. Harshman and A. C. Knapp, Topological exchange statistics in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A105, 052214 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Hao and S

    Y. Hao and S. Chen, Dynamical properties of hard-core anyons in one-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A86, 043631 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Bonkhoff, K

    M. Bonkhoff, K. J¨ agering, S. Hu, A. Pelster, S. Eg- gert, and I. Schneider, Anyonic Phase Transitions in the 1D Extended Hubbard Model with Fractional Statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036601 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    N. L. Harshman and A. C. Knapp, Anyons from three- body hard-core interactions in one dimension, Ann. Phys.412, 168003 (2020)

    2020

  20. [29]

    O. W. Greenberg and A. M. L. Messiah, Selection Rules for Parafields and the Absence of Para Particles in Na- ture, Phys. Rev.138, B1155 (1965)

    1965

  21. [30]

    Fredenhagen, K

    K. Fredenhagen, K. H. Rehren, and B. Schroer, Supers- election sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras - I. General theory, Commun. Math. Phys125, 201 (1989)

    1989

  22. [31]

    Wang and K

    Z. Wang and K. R. A. Hazzard, Particle exchange statistics beyond fermions and bosons, Nature637, 314 (2025)

    2025

  23. [32]

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identi- cal particles, Nuov. Cim. Soc. Ital. Fis.37B, 1 (1977)

    1977

  24. [33]

    Wilczek, Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Par- ticles, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Par- ticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 957 (1982)

    1982

  25. [34]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    2006

  26. [35]

    Fractional statistics

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Fractional statistics” in arbitrary di- mensions: A generalization of the Pauli principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 937 (1991)

    1991

  27. [36]

    Theel, M

    F. Theel, M. Bonkhoff, P. Schmelcher, T. Posske, and N. L. Harshman, Chirally Protected State Manipulation by Tuning One-Dimensional Statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 063401 (2025)

    2025

  28. [37]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topologi- cal quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  29. [38]

    Wigner, Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, inGrup- pentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quanten- mechanik der Atomspektren, edited by E

    E. Wigner, Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, inGrup- pentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quanten- mechanik der Atomspektren, edited by E. Wigner (Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1931) pp. 34–43

    1931

  30. [39]

    Cartan, Sur une classe remarquable d’espaces de Rie- mann, Bull

    E. Cartan, Sur une classe remarquable d’espaces de Rie- mann, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr.54, 214 (1926)

    1926

  31. [41]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Particle-hole symmetries in condensed matter, J. Math. Phys.62, 10.1063/5.0035358 (2020)

    2020 doi

  32. [42]

    Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle: I

    H. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle: I. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette, Z. Phys.71, 205 (1931)

    1931

  33. [43]

    Essler, H

    F. Essler, H. Frahm, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. Korepin, The One-Dimensional Hubbard model, The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2010)

    2010

  34. [44]

    Baxter,Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechan- ics(Academic Press, 2016)

    R. Baxter,Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechan- ics(Academic Press, 2016)

    2016

  35. [45]

    E. H. Lieb, Exact analysis of an interacting bose gas. II. the excitation spectrum, Phys. Rev.130, 1616 (1963)

    1963

  36. [46]

    Solidification

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Solidification” in a soluble model of bosons on a one-dimensional lattice: The “Boson- Hubbard chain”, Phys. Lett. A80, 281 (1980)

    1980

  37. [47]

    T. C. Choy, Some exact results for a degenerate Hub- bard model in one dimension, Phys. Lett. A80, 49 (1980)

    1980

  38. [48]

    T. C. Choy and F. D. M. Haldane, Failure of Bethe- Ansatz solutions of generalisations of the Hubbard chain to arbitrary permutation symmetry, Phys. Lett. A90, 15 83 (1982)

    1982

  39. [49]

    A. R. Kolovsky and A. Buchleitner, Quantum chaos in the Bose-Hubbard model, Europhys. Lett.68, 632 (2004)

    2004

  40. [50]

    Kollath, A

    C. Kollath, A. M. L¨ auchli, and E. Altman, Quench dy- namics and nonequilibrium phase diagram of the Bose- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 180601 (2007)

    2007

  41. [51]

    Kollath, G

    C. Kollath, G. Roux, G. Biroli, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Statistical properties of the spectrum of the extended Bose–Hubbard model, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2010(08), P08011

    2010

  42. [52]

    de la Cruz, S

    J. de la Cruz, S. Lerma-Hern´ andez, and J. G. Hirsch, Quantum chaos in a system with high degree of symme- tries, Phys. Rev. E102, 032208 (2020)

    2020

  43. [53]

    Russomanno, M

    A. Russomanno, M. Fava, and R. Fazio, Nonergodic be- havior of the clean Bose-Hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144302 (2020)

    2020

  44. [54]

    Links, The Yang–Baxter paradox, J

    J. Links, The Yang–Baxter paradox, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 254001 (2021)

    2021

  45. [55]

    Pausch, E

    L. Pausch, E. G. Carnio, A. Rodr´ ıguez, and A. Buchleit- ner, Chaos and ergodicity across the energy spectrum of interacting bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 150601 (2021)

    2021

  46. [56]

    Pausch, A

    L. Pausch, A. Buchleitner, E. G. Carnio, and A. Rodr´ ıguez, Optimal route to quantum chaos in the Bose–Hubbard model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 324002 (2022)

    2022

  47. [57]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

    2011

  48. [58]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Superfluidity(Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  49. [59]

    Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Phys

    M. Olshanii, Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 938 (1998)

    1998

  50. [60]

    Hofstetter, I

    W. Hofstetter, I. Affleck, D. Nelson, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Non-hermitian Luttinger liquids and vortex physics, Eu- rophys. Lett.66, 178 (2004)

    2004

  51. [61]

    Affleck, W

    I. Affleck, W. Hofstetter, D. R. Nelson, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Non-hermitian Luttinger liquids and flux line pinning in planar superconductors, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2004(10), P10003

    2004

  52. [62]

    Oelkers and J

    N. Oelkers and J. Links, Ground-state properties of the attractive one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B75, 115119 (2007)

    2007

  53. [64]

    Valiente and D

    M. Valiente and D. Petrosyan, Scattering resonances and two-particle bound states of the extended Hub- bard model, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.42, 121001 (2009)

    2009

  54. [66]

    C. D. E. Boschi, E. Ercolessi, L. Ferrari, P. Naldesi, F. Ortolani, and L. Taddia, Bound states and expansion dynamics of interacting bosons on a one-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. A90, 043606 (2014)

    2014

  55. [67]

    Longhi and G

    S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, Tamm–Hubbard surface states in the continuum, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter25, 235601 (2013)

    2013

  56. [68]

    J. Polo, P. Naldesi, A. Minguzzi, and L. Amico, Exact results for persistent currents of two bosons in a ring lattice, Phys. Rev. A101, 043418 (2020)

    2020

  57. [69]

    Y. Li, D. Schneble, and T.-C. Wei, Two-particle states in one-dimensional coupled Bose-Hubbard mod- els, Phys. Rev. A105, 053310 (2022)

    2022

  58. [70]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. Greschner, E. Fan, T. C. Scott, and Y. Zhang, Ground-state properties of the one- dimensional unconstrained pseudo-anyon Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A95, 053614 (2017)

    2017

  59. [71]

    Longhi and G

    S. Longhi and G. Della Valle, Anyonic Bloch oscilla- tions, Phys. Rev. B85, 165144 (2012)

    2012

  60. [72]

    Longhi and G

    S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, Anyons in one-dimensional lattices: A photonic realization, Opt. Lett.37, 2160 (2012)

    2012

  61. [73]

    L. L. Lau and S. Dutta, Quantum walk of two anyons across a statistical boundary, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012007 (2022)

    2022

  62. [74]

    Zheng, J

    C. Zheng, J. Xie, M. Zhang, Y. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Necessity of orthogonal basis vectors for the two-anyon problem in a one-dimensional lattice, Commun. Theor. Phys.76, 125103 (2024)

    2024

  63. [75]

    Bonkhoff, S

    M. Bonkhoff, S. B. J¨ ager, I. Schneider, A. Pelster, and S. Eggert, Coherence properties of the repulsive anyon- Hubbard dimer, Phys. Rev. B108, 155134 (2023)

    2023

  64. [76]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Symmetry classes, inThe Oxford Handbook of Random Matrix Theory, edited by G. Ake- mann, J. Baik, and P. Di Francesco (Oxford University Press, 2015)

    2015

  65. [77]

    Tonks, The complete equation of state of one, two and three-dimensional gases of hard elastic spheres, Phys

    L. Tonks, The complete equation of state of one, two and three-dimensional gases of hard elastic spheres, Phys. Rev.50, 955 (1936)

    1936

  66. [78]

    Girardeau, Relationship between systems of impen- etrable bosons and fermions in one dimension, J

    M. Girardeau, Relationship between systems of impen- etrable bosons and fermions in one dimension, J. Math. Phys.1, 516 (1960)

    1960

  67. [80]

    F. H. L. Essler, H. Frahm, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. E. Korepin,The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  68. [81]

    M. T. Batchelor, A. Foerster, X.-W. Guan, J. Links, and H.-Q. Zhou, The quantum inverse scattering method with anyonic grading, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 465201 (2008)

    2008

  69. [82]

    Kundu, Quantum Integrable 1D anyonic Models: Construction through Braided Yang-Baxter Equation, SIGMA

    A. Kundu, Quantum Integrable 1D anyonic Models: Construction through Braided Yang-Baxter Equation, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Meth- ods and Applications6, 080 (2010)

    2010

  70. [83]

    O. I. Pˆ atu, V. E. Korepin, and D. V. Averin, Correla- tion functions of one-dimensional Lieb–Liniger anyons, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.40, 14963 (2007)

    2007

  71. [84]

    M. T. Batchelor, X.-W. Guan, and J.-S. He, The Bethe ansatz for 1D interacting anyons, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2007(03), P03007

    2007

  72. [85]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys.17, 675 (2021)

    2021

  73. [86]

    Banerjee and A

    D. Banerjee and A. Sen, Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 220601 (2021)

    2021

  74. [87]

    C. J. Turner, M. Szyniszewski, B. Mukherjee, R. Me- lendrez, H. J. Changlani, and A. Pal, Stable infinite- temperature eigenstates in SU(2)-symmetric noninte- grable models (2025), arXiv:2407.11956 [quant-ph]. 16

    2025

  75. [88]

    G. Tang, S. Eggert, and A. Pelster, Ground-state prop- erties of anyons in a one-dimensional lattice, New J. Phys.17, 123016 (2015)

    2015

  76. [89]

    Lange, S

    F. Lange, S. Ejima, and H. Fehske, Anyonic Haldane In- sulator in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 120401 (2017)

    2017

  77. [90]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble mod- els of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys.16, 407 (1961)

    1961

  78. [91]

    H. W. Capel and Th. J. Siskens, Note on the differ- ence between the a-cyclic and c-cyclic version of the XY model, Physica A81, 214 (1975)

    1975

  79. [92]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries, SciPost Phys.16, 064 (2024)

    2024

  80. [93]

    Physik26, 178 (1924)

    Bose, Plancks Gesetz und Lichtquantenhypothese, Z. Physik26, 178 (1924)

    1924

  81. [94]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hy- brid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  82. [95]

    Hamermesh,Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems, reprint edition ed

    M. Hamermesh,Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems, reprint edition ed. (Dover Publica- tions, New York, 1989)

    1989

  83. [96]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: Ten- fold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  84. [97]

    Bohigas and M.-J

    O. Bohigas and M.-J. Giannoni, Chaotic motion and random matrix theories, inMathematical and Compu- tational Methods in Nuclear Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984) pp. 1–99

    1984

  85. [98]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characteri- zation of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  86. [99]

    M. V. Berry and M. Robnik, Semiclassical level spac- ings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.17, 2413 (1984)

    1984

  87. [100]

    M. V. Berry, Semiclassical theory of spectral rigidity, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A400, 229 (1985)

    1985

  88. [101]

    M. V. Berry and M. Robnik, Statistics of energy lev- els without time-reversal symmetry: Aharonov-Bohm chaotic billiards, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.19, 649 (1986)

    1986

  89. [102]

    Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf

    A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  90. [103]

    Robnik and M

    M. Robnik and M. V. Berry, False time-reversal viola- tion and energy level statistics: The role of anti-unitary symmetry, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.19, 669 (1986)

    1986

  91. [104]

    Damski and J

    B. Damski and J. Zakrzewski, Mott-insulator phase of the one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model: A high-order perturbative study, Phys. Rev. A74, 043609 (2006)

    2006

  92. [105]

    Grusdt, M

    F. Grusdt, M. H¨ oning, and M. Fleischhauer, Topological Edge States in the One-Dimensional Superlattice Bose- Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 260405 (2013)

    2013

  93. [106]

    J. Yu, N. Sun, and H. Zhai, Symmetry Protected Dy- namical Symmetry in the Generalized Hubbard Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 225302 (2017)

    2017

  94. [108]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1201 (1989)

    1989

  95. [109]

    O. J. Heilmann and E. H. Lieb, Violation of the Non- crossing Rule: The Hubbard Hamiltonian for Benzene, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.172, 584 (1971)

    1971

  96. [110]

    Sriram Shastry, Decorated star-triangle relations and exact integrability of the one-dimensional Hubbard model, J

    B. Sriram Shastry, Decorated star-triangle relations and exact integrability of the one-dimensional Hubbard model, J. Stat. Phys.50, 57 (1988)

    1988

  97. [111]

    Grosse, The symmetry of the Hubbard model, Lett

    H. Grosse, The symmetry of the Hubbard model, Lett. Math. Phys.18, 151 (1989)

    1989

  98. [112]

    Nicolau, M

    E. Nicolau, M. Ljubotina, and M. Serbyn, Fragmenta- tion, Zero Modes, and Collective Bound States in Con- strained Models, PRX Quantum7, 010352 (2026)

    2026

  99. [113]

    Von Neumann and E

    J. Von Neumann and E. Wigner, On some peculiar dis- crete eigenvalues, Phys. Z30, 465 (1929)

    1929

  100. [114]

    Wigner and J

    E. Wigner and J. Von Neumann, Uber das verhalten von eigenwerten bei adiabatischen prozessen, Phys. Zeit 30, 467 (1929)

    1929

  101. [115]

    V. V. Stepanov, G. M¨ uller, and J. Stolze, Quantum inte- grability and nonintegrability in the spin-boson model, Phys. Rev. E77, 066202 (2008)

    2008

  102. [116]

    Braak, J

    D. Braak, J. M. Zhang, and M. Kollar, Integrability and weak diffraction in a two-particle Bose-Hubbard model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 465303 (2014)

    2014

  103. [117]

    J. M. Zhang, D. Braak, and M. Kollar, Bound states in the continuum realized in the one-dimensional two- particle hubbard model with an impurity, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 116405 (2012)

    2012

  104. [118]

    Mehta,Random Matrices(Academic Press, 1991)

    M. Mehta,Random Matrices(Academic Press, 1991)

    1991

  105. [119]

    T. Guhr, A. M¨ uller–Groeling, and H. A. Weidenm¨ uller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common concepts, Phys. Rep.299, 189 (1998)

    1998

  106. [120]

    D. A. Rabson, B. N. Narozhny, and A. J. Millis, Crossover from poisson to wigner-dyson level statistics in spin chains with integrability breaking, Phys. Rev. B 69, 054403 (2004)

    2004

  107. [121]

    T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. S. M. Wong, Random-matrix physics: spectrum and strength fluctuations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981)

    1981

  108. [122]

    Poilblanc, T

    D. Poilblanc, T. Ziman, J. Bellissard, F. Mila, and G. Montambaux, Poisson vs. GOE Statistics in Inte- grable and Non-Integrable Quantum Hamiltonians, Eu- rophys. Lett.22, 537 (1993)

    1993

  109. [123]

    Kieburg, Quantum chaotic systems: a random- matrix approach (2026), arXiv:2604.12141 [quant-ph]

    M. Kieburg, Quantum chaotic systems: a random- matrix approach (2026), arXiv:2604.12141 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  110. [124]

    Takahashi and S

    K. Takahashi and S. Iida, Energy-level correlations in chiral symmetric disordered systems: Corrections to the universal results, Phys. Rev. B63, 214201 (2001)

    2001

  111. [125]

    S. N. Evangelou and D. E. Katsanos, Spectral statis- tics in chiral-orthogonal disordered systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.36, 3237 (2003)

    2003

  112. [126]

    Rehemanjiang, M

    A. Rehemanjiang, M. Richter, U. Kuhl, and H.-J. St¨ ockmann, Microwave realization of the chiral orthogo- nal, unitary, and symplectic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 116801 (2020)

    2020

  113. [127]

    Fogarty, M

    T. Fogarty, M. ´A. Garc´ ıa-March, L. F. Santos, and N. L. Harshman, Probing the edge between integrability and quantum chaos in interacting few-atom systems, Quan- tum5, 486 (2021)

    2021

  114. [128]

    M. V. Berry and M. Tabor, Level clustering in the regu- lar spectrum, Proc. R. Soc. Lond.356, 375–394 (1977)

    1977

  115. [129]

    M. A. Garcia-March, S. v. Frank, M. Bonneau, J. Schmiedmayer, M. Lewenstein, and L. F. Santos, Relaxation, chaos, and thermalization in a three-mode model of a Bose–Einstein condensate, New J. Phys.20, 113039 (2018). 17

    2018

  116. [130]

    Pandey and R

    A. Pandey and R. Ramaswamy, Level spacings for harmonic-oscillator systems, Phys. Rev. A43, 4237 (1991)

    1991

  117. [131]

    Pecci, G

    G. Pecci, G. Aupetit-Diallo, M. Albert, P. Vignolo, and A. Minguzzi, Persistent currents in a strongly interact- ing multicomponent Bose gas on a ring, C. R. Phys.. Physique24, 87 (2023)

    2023

  118. [132]

    A. G. Izergin and V. E. Korepin, Pauli principle for one-dimensional bosons and the algebraic bethe ansatz, Lett. Mat. Phys.6, 283 (1982)

    1982

  119. [133]

    V. Alba, K. Saha, and M. Haque, Bethe ansatz descrip- tion of edge-localization in the open-boundary xxz spin chain, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2013(10), P10018

    2013

  120. [134]

    M. T. Batchelor, X. W. Guan, N. Oelkers, and C. Lee, The 1D interacting Bose gas in a hard wall box, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.38, 7787 (2005)

    2005

  121. [135]

    J. M. Zhang, D. Braak, and M. Kollar, Bound states in the one-dimensional two-particle Hubbard model with an impurity, Phys. Rev. A87, 023613 (2013)

    2013

  122. [136]

    Zhang, L

    W. Zhang, L. Qian, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Anyonic bound states in the continuum, Commun. Phys.6, 1 (2023)

    2023

  123. [137]

    Valiente and D

    M. Valiente and D. Petrosyan, Two-particle states in the Hubbard model, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 161002 (2008)

    2008

  124. [138]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B81, 245129 (2010)

    2010

  125. [139]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys.85, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  126. [140]

    Brighi, M

    P. Brighi, M. Ljubotina, and M. Serbyn, Hilbert space fragmentation and slow dynamics in particle-conserving quantum East models, SciPost Phys.15, 093 (2023)

    2023

  127. [141]

    Kaneko, M

    R. Kaneko, M. Kunimi, and I. Danshita, Quantum many-body scars in the Bose-Hubbard model with a three-body constraint, Phys. Rev. A109, L011301 (2024)

    2024

  128. [142]

    J. P. Ronzheimer, M. Schreiber, S. Braun, S. S. Hodg- man, S. Langer, I. P. McCulloch, F. Heidrich-Meisner, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Expansion dynamics of in- teracting bosons in homogeneous lattices in one and two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 205301 (2013)

    2013

  129. [143]

    F. Liu, J. R. Garrison, D.-L. Deng, Z.-X. Gong, and A. V. Gorshkov, Asymmetric Particle Transport and Light-Cone Dynamics Induced by Anyonic Statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250404 (2018)

    2018

  130. [144]

    L. Lin, Y. Ke, and C. Lee, Topological invariants for interacting systems: From twisted boundary conditions to center-of-mass momentum, Phys. Rev. B107, 125161 (2023)

    2023

  131. [145]

    Reiner, D

    V. Reiner, D. Stanton, and D. White, The cyclic sieving phenomenon, J. Comb. Theory Ser. Ay, Series A108, 17 (2004)

    2004

  132. [146]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B34, 5208 (1986)

    1986

  133. [147]

    Maimaiti, A

    W. Maimaiti, A. Andreanov, H. C. Park, O. Gendel- man, and S. Flach, Compact localized states and flat- band generators in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B95, 115135 (2017)

    2017

  134. [148]

    C. P. Chen, M. Szyniszewski, and H. Schomerus, Many- body localization of zero modes, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023118 (2020). 18 Appendix A: Gauge Equivalence To understand how the bosonic model with open boundary conditions in Eq. (4) implements the exchange phaseθand to gain insigh...

    2020

  135. [149]

    The relevant characters for the two-element groupZ 2

    Open boundary conditions symmetry multiplicity Z2 I s χ+ 1 1 χ− 1 -1 χH Tr(ˆI) =D Tr( ˆP) =d 0 Tr( ˆPπ) =d 0 −2o π TABLE III. The relevant characters for the two-element groupZ 2. Atθ= 0 the representationU(Z 2) isU(I) = ˆID, U(s) = ˆP. Atθ=π, the representation ofU(Z 2) is U(...

  136. [150]

    Cyclic Multiplicity We calculate the multiplicitym ZL q of eigenstates with momentum 2πq/Lvia character orthogonality, using characters from Tab. IV: mZL q = 1 L L−1X k=0 χ∗ q(rk)Tr(ˆRk).(B5) We calculate Tr(ˆRk) via the Cyclic Sieving Phenomenon (CSP) [142] to be Tr(ˆRk) = N+...

  137. [151]

    The first relevant character values for calculating dihedral multiplicities atθ= 0 are the 1D irreducible char- actersχ 0,+,χ 0,−,χ L/2,+, andχ L/2,−

    Dihedral Multiplicities atθ= 0 DL ⟨s, r|r L =s 2 = 1, sr ns−1 =r −n⟩ DL I rk sr2k sr2k+1 χ0,+ 1 1 1 1 χ0,− 1 1 -1 -1 χL/2,+ 1 (−1)k 1 -1 χL/2,− 1 (−1)k -1 1 χq,−q 2 ωqk +ω −qk 0 0 χH Tr(ˆI) Tr(ˆRk) Tr( ˆP) Tr( ˆP ˆR) TABLE V. The first relevant character values for calculating...

  138. [152]

    Dihedral Multiplicities atθ=π Let us first provide auxiliary relations that we found necessary to analyze periodic boundary conditions. Con- cerning the gauge transformation ˆW(α) for generalα (36), we find ˆW(α)ˆbj ˆW(α) † = exp(−iαj) ˆbj,(B20) ˆP ˆW(α) ˆP † = exp(iα(L+ 1)N) ...

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.