Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Asymptotic Quantum Dynamics of Ghost Fields

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ghost fields develop no free asymptotic one-particle states because complex poles keep interactions alive at late times.

desk verdict The paper claims complex poles in the ghost propagator force non-orthogonality so that no free asymptotic one-particle ghost state exists, but the step from pole location to persistent asymptotic interactions is not obviously secured. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.29047 v1 pith:EBD7NTX2 submitted 2026-05-27 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Luca Buoninfante This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph
keywords ghostfieldsasymptoticstatescomplexpolesdressedpropagatorquantuminterferencenegativenormlocalfieldtheorymulti-particlethreshold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that when a ghost field couples to ordinary fields its dressed propagator acquires a pair of complex conjugate poles above the multi-particle threshold. Within the operator formalism of local quantum field theory these poles imply that the ghost field continues to interact with the composite field built from the multi-particle states even at asymptotic times. The resulting quantum interference makes the negative-norm one-particle ghost state non-orthogonal to superpositions of positive-norm multi-particle states, so the ghost cannot be regarded as a free propagating particle that reaches a detector at infinity. The imaginary part of the complex mass fixes the timescale on which this non-orthogonality appears, confining any would-be free ghost to intervals much shorter than that inverse width.

What carries the argument

Persistence of interactions at asymptotic times between the ghost field and the composite multi-particle field, induced by complex conjugate poles in the dressed propagator and producing quantum interference.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in a concrete model demonstrating that the one-particle ghost state remains orthogonal to all multi-particle states at asymptotic times despite the presence of complex poles would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The dressed propagator of a ghost coupled to ordinary fields develops a pair of complex conjugate poles in the first Riemann sheet above the multi-particle threshold. Within the operator formalism of local quantum field theory, interactions between the ghost field and the composite field of the multi-particle state persist at asymptotic times. These induce quantum interference effects that render the negative-norm one-particle state non-orthogonal to, and thus indistinguishable from, a superposition of positive-norm multi-particle states. As a result, no free asymptotic one-particle ghost state exists. The real and imaginary parts of the complex mass admit a clear physical interpretation; in

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that complex conjugate poles in the dressed propagator necessarily imply persistent interactions at asymptotic times in the operator formalism of local quantum field theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inverse of the imaginary part of the complex mass fixes the timescale on which non-orthogonality develops.
  • A freely propagating ghost is confined to time intervals much shorter than its inverse width.
  • A detector cannot observe an isolated ghost particle at asymptotic times.
  • The negative-norm one-particle state becomes indistinguishable from ordinary multi-particle superpositions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that ghosts may be used in effective theories without producing observable violations of unitarity at late times.
  • It raises questions about the proper definition of the S-matrix when asymptotic states are not free one-particle states.
  • Similar non-orthogonality effects could appear in other resonant or unstable sectors of quantum field theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the dressed propagator of a ghost coupled to ordinary fields develops complex conjugate poles above the multi-particle threshold. Within the operator formalism of local QFT, interactions between the ghost field and the composite multi-particle field persist at asymptotic times, inducing quantum interference that renders the negative-norm one-particle ghost state non-orthogonal to a superposition of positive-norm multi-particle states. Consequently, no free asymptotic one-particle ghost state exists; the inverse imaginary part of the complex mass sets the timescale for the onset of non-orthogonality, confining a freely propagating ghost to short time intervals.

Significance. If the result holds, it provides a mechanism by which ghost fields in local QFT cannot appear as isolated free particles at asymptotic times, with potential implications for unitarity and observability in theories containing ghosts (e.g., higher-derivative models). The paper supplies a physical reading of the real and imaginary parts of the complex mass without introducing free parameters or ad-hoc entities, and grounds the argument in the standard operator formalism rather than a fitted construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (asymptotic dynamics)] The central step from the appearance of complex-conjugate poles in the dressed propagator to the conclusion of persistent interactions at t→±∞ (producing irreducible non-orthogonality) is load-bearing for the claim that no free asymptotic one-particle state exists. The manuscript does not supply an explicit construction of candidate asymptotic operators via a smeared LSZ-type limit applied to the interacting field, followed by a demonstration that the imaginary part of the pole forces a non-vanishing overlap that cannot be removed by redefinition of the dressing function.
  2. [§3 (pole structure and operator formalism)] Standard resonance treatments map complex poles to finite lifetimes while still permitting asymptotic states; the paper does not provide a concrete check showing why the ghost case evades this within the local operator algebra, particularly regarding conditions on the dressing procedure and the multi-particle spectrum. This leaves the weakest assumption unaddressed by direct derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Conclusions] The abstract and conclusions reference open questions and applications, but a short comparison to existing literature on complex poles in propagators (e.g., how resonances are handled in ordinary QFT) would clarify the claimed distinction without altering the central argument.
  2. Notation for the composite multi-particle field and the smearing functions could be introduced earlier for readability, though this is a presentation issue.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful report and for recognizing the potential implications of our results for unitarity in ghost-containing theories. We address each major comment below with clarifications from the operator formalism used in the manuscript. Where the comments identify opportunities for greater explicitness, we indicate revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (asymptotic dynamics)] The central step from the appearance of complex-conjugate poles in the dressed propagator to the conclusion of persistent interactions at t→±∞ (producing irreducible non-orthogonality) is load-bearing for the claim that no free asymptotic one-particle state exists. The manuscript does not supply an explicit construction of candidate asymptotic operators via a smeared LSZ-type limit applied to the interacting field, followed by a demonstration that the imaginary part of the pole forces a non-vanishing overlap that cannot be removed by redefinition of the dressing function.

    Authors: The manuscript derives the persistent interactions directly from the analytic continuation of the dressed propagator into the complex plane and the resulting non-unitary time evolution within the local operator algebra. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit smeared LSZ-type construction would make the load-bearing step more transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add to §4 a derivation of candidate asymptotic operators, demonstrating that the imaginary part of the pole produces an irreducible overlap with the multi-particle continuum that survives any redefinition of the dressing function. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (pole structure and operator formalism)] Standard resonance treatments map complex poles to finite lifetimes while still permitting asymptotic states; the paper does not provide a concrete check showing why the ghost case evades this within the local operator algebra, particularly regarding conditions on the dressing procedure and the multi-particle spectrum. This leaves the weakest assumption unaddressed by direct derivation.

    Authors: The ghost case differs because the negative-norm one-particle state lies above the multi-particle threshold on the first Riemann sheet, so the complex poles induce non-decaying interference rather than exponential decay into the continuum. We will revise §3 to include an explicit comparison with standard resonance treatments, deriving the conditions on the dressing function and the spectrum under which the usual mapping to asymptotic states fails for negative-norm fields. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivation from dressed propagator poles to asymptotic non-orthogonality is independent

full rationale

The paper begins from the standard QFT fact of complex-conjugate poles in the dressed ghost propagator above the multi-particle threshold and derives the claimed non-orthogonality of the one-particle state via persistence of interactions in the local operator formalism. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, self-citation chain, or renamed ansatz; the central implication is presented as following from the pole structure and operator algebra rather than being presupposed. The argument is therefore self-contained against external QFT benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard assumption that local QFT operator formalism applies to ghosts and that complex poles in the dressed propagator imply persistent asymptotic mixing; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The dressed propagator of a ghost coupled to ordinary fields develops a pair of complex conjugate poles in the first Riemann sheet above the multi-particle threshold.
    This is the starting physical input stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Interactions between the ghost field and the composite field of the multi-particle state persist at asymptotic times within the operator formalism of local quantum field theory.
    This is the key step linking the pole structure to the non-orthogonality result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotic Quantum Dynamics of Ghost Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBD7NTX2

@misc{pith2026260529047,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotic Quantum Dynamics of Ghost Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBD7NTX2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.29047}
}
read the original abstract

The dressed propagator of a ghost coupled to ordinary fields develops a pair of complex conjugate poles in the first Riemann sheet above the multi-particle threshold. We study the implications of this pole structure for the asymptotic field and its negative-norm one-particle state. Within the operator formalism of local quantum field theory, we show that interactions between the ghost field and the composite field of the multi-particle state persist at asymptotic times. These induce quantum interference effects that render the negative-norm one-particle state non-orthogonal to, and thus indistinguishable from, a superposition of positive-norm multi-particle states. As a result, no free asymptotic one-particle ghost state exists. The real and imaginary parts of the complex mass admit a clear physical interpretation; in particular, the inverse imaginary part sets the timescale for the onset of non-orthogonality. A freely propagating ghost is therefore confined to time intervals much shorter than its inverse width, so that a detector can never observe an isolated ghost particle asymptotically. Open questions and potential applications are discussed in the conclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29047 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Real (solid line) and imaginary (dashed line) parts of the wave-function renormalization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Integration contour γ used in (11) to derive the spectral representation of the ghost propagator (12). (b) Lee-Wick contour C introduced in (14). Encircled crosses indicate poles, and we recall that M2 = m2 + imΓ and Ω⃗p = p ⃗p 2 + M2. the second and fourth quadrants of the complex p0 plane. In contrast, for s = M2 the contour C cannot be deformed to the real line due to the presence of the complex poles ±Ω⃗p = … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is there ghost and tachyon free bounce in UV complete gravity theory?

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ghost- and tachyon-free bounces in AID gravity require a negative cosmological constant; known positive-Λ solutions inevitably contain ghost radiation.

  2. Ghosts versus Unstable Particles in Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ghosts lack asymptotic particle interpretation due to interference and different Riemann-sheet pole structures compared to decaying unstable particles, with finite-time effects producing narrower resonances and higher peaks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    On Field theories with nonlocalized action,

    A. Pais and G. E. Uhlenbeck, “On Field theories with nonlocalized action,”Phys. Rev.79 (1950) 145–165

    1950

  2. [2]

    No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, “No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model,”Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 110402,arXiv:0706.0207 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Quantum mechanics of 4-derivative theories

    A. Salvio and A. Strumia, “Quantum mechanics of 4-derivative theories,”Eur. Phys. J. C 76no. 4, (2016) 227,arXiv:1512.01237 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Running couplings and unitarity in a 4-derivative scalar field theory,

    B. Holdom, “Running couplings and unitarity in a 4-derivative scalar field theory,”Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 138023,arXiv:2303.06723 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    UV-complete 4-derivative scalar field theory,

    B. Holdom, “UV-complete 4-derivative scalar field theory,”Nucl. Phys. B1000(2024) 116472,arXiv:2402.09223 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Negative Metric and the Unitarity of the S Matrix,

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, “Negative Metric and the Unitarity of the S Matrix,”Nucl. Phys. B9(1969) 209–243

    1969

  7. [7]

    Finite Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics,

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, “Finite Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D2 (1970) 1033–1048

    1970

  8. [8]

    Relativistic complex pole model with indefinite metric,

    T. D. Lee, “Relativistic complex pole model with indefinite metric,” inQuanta: Essays in Theoretical Physics Dedicated to G. Wentzel (Chicago Univ. Press), pp. 260–308. 1970. 25

    1970

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    A non-analytic S matrix,

    R. E. Cutkosky, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne, “A non-analytic S matrix,”Nucl. Phys. B12(1969) 281–300

    1969

  2. [10]

    Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 953–969

    1977

  3. [11]

    Renormalizability and Asymptotic Freedom in Quantum Gravity,

    E. Tomboulis, “Renormalizability and Asymptotic Freedom in Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Lett. B97(1980) 77–80

    1980

  4. [12]

    ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM IN HIGHER DERIVATIVE QUANTUM GRAVITY,

    I. G. Avramidi and A. O. Barvinsky, “ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM IN HIGHER DERIVATIVE QUANTUM GRAVITY,”Phys. Lett. B159(1985) 269–274

    1985

  5. [13]

    Quadratic Gravity,

    A. Salvio, “Quadratic Gravity,”Front. in Phys.6(2018) 77,arXiv:1804.09944 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Quantum Gravity, Fakeons And Microcausality,

    D. Anselmi and M. Piva, “Quantum Gravity, Fakeons And Microcausality,”JHEP11 (2018) 021,arXiv:1806.03605 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    On quadratic gravity,

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, “On quadratic gravity,”Nuovo Cim. C45no. 2, (2022) 26,arXiv:2112.01974 [hep-th]

    2022

  8. [16]

    Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,

    B. Holdom, “Ultra-Planckian scattering from a QFT for gravity,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 046008,arXiv:2107.01727 [hep-th]

    2022

  9. [17]

    Massless and partially massless limits in Quadratic Gravity,

    L. Buoninfante, “Massless and partially massless limits in Quadratic Gravity,”JHEP12 (2023) 111,arXiv:2308.11324 [hep-th]

    2023

  10. [18]

    Strict renormalizability as a paradigm for fundamental physics,

    L. Buoninfante, “Strict renormalizability as a paradigm for fundamental physics,”JHEP 07(2025) 175,arXiv:2504.05900 [hep-th]

    2025

  11. [19]

    Unitarity through PT symmetry in quantum quadratic gravity,

    J. Kuntz, “Unitarity through PT symmetry in quantum quadratic gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.42no. 17, (2025) 175003,arXiv:2410.08278 [hep-th]

    2025

  12. [20]

    Manifestly covariant canonical formalism of quadratic gravity,

    I. Oda, “Manifestly covariant canonical formalism of quadratic gravity,”JCAP08(2025) 079,arXiv:2505.09149 [hep-th]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Unitarity Quadratic Quantum Gravity in 4D,

    K. S. Kumar and J. Marto, “Unitarity Quadratic Quantum Gravity in 4D,” arXiv:2604.19707 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Acausality,

    S. Coleman, “Acausality,” in7th International School of Subnuclear Physics (Ettore Majorana): Subnuclear Phenomena. 1969

    1969

  15. [23]

    Anti-Instability of Complex Ghost,

    J. Kubo and T. Kugo, “Anti-Instability of Complex Ghost,”PTEP2024no. 5, (2024) 053B01,arXiv:2402.15956 [hep-th]

    2024

  16. [24]

    Remarks on ghost resonances,

    L. Buoninfante, “Remarks on ghost resonances,”JHEP02(2025) 186,arXiv:2501.04097 [hep-th]. 26

    2025

  17. [25]

    Causality as an emergent macroscopic phenomenon: The Lee-Wick O(N) model,

    B. Grinstein, D. O’Connell, and M. B. Wise, “Causality as an emergent macroscopic phenomenon: The Lee-Wick O(N) model,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 105019, arXiv:0805.2156 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts,

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, “Unitarity, stability and loops of unstable ghosts,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 10, (2019) 105006,arXiv:1908.02416 [hep-th]

    2019

  19. [27]

    Diagrammar of physical and fake particles and spectral optical theorem,

    D. Anselmi, “Diagrammar of physical and fake particles and spectral optical theorem,” JHEP11(2021) 030,arXiv:2109.06889 [hep-th]

    2021

  20. [28]

    Unitarity violation in field theories of Lee–Wick’s complex ghost,

    J. Kubo and T. Kugo, “Unitarity violation in field theories of Lee–Wick’s complex ghost,” PTEP2023no. 12, (2023) 123B02,arXiv:2308.09006 [hep-th]

    2023

  21. [29]

    Covariant formulation of the complex-ghost relativistic field theory and the lorentz noninvariance of the s matrix,

    N. Nakanishi, “Covariant formulation of the complex-ghost relativistic field theory and the lorentz noninvariance of the s matrix,”Phys. Rev. D5(1972) 1968–1975

    1972

  22. [30]

    Dimensional Transmutation in Gravity and Cosmology,

    A. Salvio, “Dimensional Transmutation in Gravity and Cosmology,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36no. 08n09, (2021) 2130006,arXiv:2012.11608 [hep-th]

    2021

  23. [31]

    L. S. Brown,Quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press, 7, 1994

    1994

  24. [32]

    Bound states of massive complex ghosts in superrenormalizable quantum gravity theories,

    M. Asorey, G. Krein, M. Pardina, and I. L. Shapiro, “Bound states of massive complex ghosts in superrenormalizable quantum gravity theories,”JHEP01(2025) 113, arXiv:2408.16514 [gr-qc]

    2025

  25. [33]

    Bound States in Lee’s Complex Ghost Model,

    I. Oda, “Bound States in Lee’s Complex Ghost Model,”arXiv:2602.05562 [hep-th]

  26. [34]

    Bound States in Scalar Theory with Fourth-order Derivative Term,

    I. Oda, “Bound States in Scalar Theory with Fourth-order Derivative Term,” arXiv:2603.19478 [hep-th]

  27. [35]

    Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,

    M. J. G. Veltman, “Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles,”Physica29(1963) 186–207

    1963

  28. [36]

    On the formulation of quantized field theories,

    H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann, “On the formulation of quantized field theories,”Nuovo Cim.1(1955) 205–225

    1955

  29. [37]

    Giunti and C

    C. Giunti and C. W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics. 2007

    2007

  30. [38]

    Interpretation of quantum mechanics with indefinite norm,

    A. Strumia, “Interpretation of quantum mechanics with indefinite norm,”MDPI Physics1 no. 1, (2019) 17–32,arXiv:1709.04925 [quant-ph]

    2019

  31. [39]

    Making sense of ghosts,

    B. Holdom, “Making sense of ghosts,”Nucl. Phys. B1008(2024) 116696, arXiv:2408.04089 [hep-th]

    2024

  32. [40]

    A new approach to the LSZ reduction formula,

    J. Collins, “A new approach to the LSZ reduction formula,”arXiv:1904.10923 [hep-ph]. 27

    1904 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Quantum field theory of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite interval of time on a compact space manifold: diagrams, amplitudes and unitarity,

    D. Anselmi, “Quantum field theory of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite interval of time on a compact space manifold: diagrams, amplitudes and unitarity,”JHEP 07(2023) 209,arXiv:2304.07642 [hep-th]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Propagators and widths of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite interval of time,

    D. Anselmi, “Propagators and widths of physical and purely virtual particles in a finite interval of time,”JHEP07(2023) 099,arXiv:2304.07643 [hep-ph]

    2023

  35. [43]

    Lorentz noninvariance of the complex-ghost relativistic field theory,

    N. Nakanishi, “Lorentz noninvariance of the complex-ghost relativistic field theory,”Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 811–814

    1971

  36. [44]

    A new formulation of Lee-Wick quantum field theory,

    D. Anselmi and M. Piva, “A new formulation of Lee-Wick quantum field theory,”JHEP06 (2017) 066,arXiv:1703.04584 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Amplitude prescriptions in field theories with complex poles,

    D. Anselmi, F. Briscese, G. Calcagni, and L. Modesto, “Amplitude prescriptions in field theories with complex poles,”JHEP05(2025) 145,arXiv:2503.01841 [hep-th]

    2025

  38. [46]

    Fakeons, Microcausality And The Classical Limit Of Quantum Gravity,

    D. Anselmi, “Fakeons, Microcausality And The Classical Limit Of Quantum Gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 065010,arXiv:1809.05037 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Arrow of Causality and Quantum Gravity,

    J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, “Arrow of Causality and Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123no. 17, (2019) 171601,arXiv:1908.04170 [hep-th]

    2019

  40. [48]

    Testing the arrow of time at the cosmo collider,

    S. Aoki and A. Strumia, “Testing the arrow of time at the cosmo collider,”JCAP03 (2026) 067,arXiv:2510.05204 [hep-ph]

    2026

  41. [49]

    On Causality and Predictivity,

    D. Anselmi, “On Causality and Predictivity,”arXiv:2601.06346 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Visions in quantum gravity,

    L. Buoninfanteet al., “Visions in quantum gravity,”SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep.(2025) 11, arXiv:2412.08696 [hep-th]

    2025

  43. [51]

    Lectures in quantum gravity,

    I. Basile, L. Buoninfante, F. Di Filippo, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and A. Tokareva, “Lectures in quantum gravity,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes98(2025) 1,arXiv:2412.08690 [hep-th]

    2025

  44. [52]

    Quantum dissipation,

    E. Celeghini, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, “Quantum dissipation,”Annals Phys.215(1992) 156–170

    1992

  45. [53]

    Thermo field dynamics,

    Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. B10(1996) 1755–1805

    1996

  46. [54]

    Umezawa,Advanced field theory: Micro, macro, and thermal physics

    H. Umezawa,Advanced field theory: Micro, macro, and thermal physics. American Institute of Physics Melville, NY, 1993. 28

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.