Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 cited by

Non-destructive cavity readout of molecules for precision measurements

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupling molecules to a high-finesse optical cavity allows non-destructive readout of rotational-hyperfine state populations.

desk verdict This is a conceptual proposal for cavity readout on molecules aimed at radioactive samples, but it stays at the level of an idea without calculations or tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.01743 v1 pith:7Z7KX24D submitted 2026-06-01 physics.atom-ph nucl-exquant-ph

Alejandro Salas-Estrada , Silviu-Marian Udrescu , Geoffrey Zheng , Qian Wang , Arian Jadbabaie , Vladan Vuletić , David DeMille , Ronald F. Garcia Ruiz
show 1 more author
Edwin Pedrozo-Peñafiel
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phnucl-exquant-ph
keywords non-destructivereadoutopticalcavitymolecularrotationalstatesprecisionmeasurementsradioactivemoleculessub-SQL
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a method that measures the population of molecules in a chosen rotational-hyperfine state by coupling them to a high-finesse optical cavity. This approach produces results in less than one millisecond and supports repeated measurements while cutting heating and losses relative to existing techniques. It reaches precision below the standard quantum limit and is framed as especially useful for radioactive molecules, where sample sizes are small and multiple interrogations are required to reach useful sensitivity. A reader would see the value in any technique that extracts more information from scarce samples without destroying them.

What carries the argument

High-finesse optical cavity that couples to the molecules to extract state population information without destroying the sample.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the same molecular sample before and after cavity coupling and finds heating, loss rates, or readout noise at least as large as those in standard destructive techniques.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Coupling the molecules to a high-finesse optical cavity measures the population in a selected rotational-hyperfine state non-destructively, enabling fast repeated measurements with reduced heating and losses and with precision below the standard quantum limit, an advantage for radioactive molecules where production and sample size are limited.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity coupling can be arranged so that it does not itself introduce heating, losses, or noise sources that cancel the claimed advantages over traditional methods.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-destructive readout technique in which molecules in a selected rotational-hyperfine state are coupled to a high-finesse optical cavity. The central claims are that the method permits repeated measurements in less than 1 ms, reduces heating and losses relative to traditional techniques, achieves precision below the standard quantum limit, and is especially beneficial for radioactive molecules whose limited production makes non-destructive, repeated interrogation essential for symmetry-violation searches.

Significance. If the proposed cavity coupling can be implemented without introducing new dominant loss or noise channels, the technique would constitute a meaningful advance for precision measurements on radioactive species, where sample size is the primary sensitivity bottleneck.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of sub-SQL precision and reduced heating/losses are stated without any derivation, noise budget, or quantitative estimate of cavity parameters, coupling strength, or decoherence rates that would allow the reader to assess whether the performance targets are reachable.
  2. The manuscript provides no analysis of the cavity-molecule interaction Hamiltonian, the resulting measurement back-action, or the conditions under which the readout remains non-destructive; without these elements the central performance assertions cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript. The comments highlight the need for more quantitative support of the central claims, which we address below by outlining additions to the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of sub-SQL precision and reduced heating/losses are stated without any derivation, noise budget, or quantitative estimate of cavity parameters, coupling strength, or decoherence rates that would allow the reader to assess whether the performance targets are reachable.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text would benefit from explicit estimates. In the revision we add a new section with order-of-magnitude calculations using realistic cavity parameters (finesse ~10^5, mode volume ~10^{-12} m^3), typical molecular transition strengths, and decoherence rates from spontaneous emission and cavity loss. A basic noise budget is included showing how the dispersive readout can reach sub-SQL sensitivity while keeping heating below levels of traditional fluorescence methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript provides no analysis of the cavity-molecule interaction Hamiltonian, the resulting measurement back-action, or the conditions under which the readout remains non-destructive; without these elements the central performance assertions cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We accept that a derivation of the interaction is required. The revised manuscript adds a subsection deriving the dispersive Hamiltonian for the molecule-cavity system, estimating the AC Stark shift and photon scattering rate, and identifying the regime (large single-photon detuning, weak driving) in which back-action remains negligible over the <1 ms readout window, preserving the non-destructive character. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a forward proposal for an experimental method rather than a derivation chain. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations that reduce to inputs are described in the abstract or reader's assessment. The work focuses on advantages of cavity coupling for radioactive molecules without load-bearing mathematical steps that could exhibit circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard cavity QED assumptions but introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities in the abstract; the central claim is a method suggestion rather than a derived result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-destructive cavity readout of molecules for precision measurements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7Z7KX24D

@misc{pith2026260601743,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-destructive cavity readout of molecules for precision measurements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7Z7KX24D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.01743}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a non-destructive method to measure the population of molecules in a selected rotational-hyperfine state by coupling them to a high-finesse optical cavity. In contrast to traditional techniques, our approach enables fast (less than 1 ms) repeated measurements with reduced heating and losses, and with precision below the standard quantum limit. The method is particularly advantageous for radioactive molecules, systems of high interest for symmetry violation searches, for which production and sample size are limited, and repeated interrogation is essential for improved sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01743 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Molecules interacting strongly with the light inside [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing $P,T$-Symmetry Violation with Optically Trapped Asymmetric Top Molecules

    physics.atom-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Asymmetric top M-NH2 molecules are shown to offer long-lived ground-state parity doublets and engineered clock transitions that project electron EDM sensitivity beyond current limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The molecular cloud will then be super- posed with the optical lattice created by a standing wave inside the optical cavity

    for details). The molecular cloud will then be super- posed with the optical lattice created by a standing wave inside the optical cavity. This lattice will be used as a conservative trap for the molecules while ensuring that they are located close to the cavity waist. We expect a transfer efficiency from the MOT to the cavity lattice of about 1−10%. Then...

  2. [2]

    Navas, C

    S. Navas, C. Amsler, T. Gutsche, C. Hanhart, J. Hern´ andez-Rey, C. Louren¸ co, A. Masoni, M. Mikhasenko, R. Mitchell, C. Patrignani,et al., Physical Review D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Safronova, D

    M. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye,et al., Science381, 46 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. Ang, D. DeMille, J. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, Z. Hutzler, N.R. and. Lasner, C. Meisen- helder, B. O’Leary,et al., Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    N. R. Hutzler, Quantum Science and Technology5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Grasdijk, O

    O. Grasdijk, O. Timgren, J. Kastelic, T. Wright, S. Lam- oreaux, D. DeMille, K. Wenz, M. Aitken, T. Zelevinsky, T. Winick,et al., Quantum Science and Technology6, 044007 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Arrowsmith-Kron, M

    G. Arrowsmith-Kron, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M. Au, J. Ballof, R. Berger, A. Borschevsky, A. Breier, 6 F. Buchinger, D. Budker, and L. Caldwell, Rep. Prog. Phys.87, 084301 (2024)

    2024

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    Altunta¸ s, J

    E. Altunta¸ s, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. DeMille, Physical Review Letters120, 142501 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    J. W. Blanchard, D. Budker, D. DeMille, M. G. Ko- zlov, and L. V. Skripnikov, Physical Review Research5, 013191 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Karthein, S.-M

    J. Karthein, S.-M. Udrescu, S. B. Moroch, I. Belosevic, K. Blaum, A. Borschevsky, Y. Chamorro, D. DeMille, J. Dilling, R. F. Garcia Ruiz,et al., Physical Review Letters133, 033003 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    X. Yang, S. Wang, S. Wilkins, and R. Garcia Ruiz, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.129, 104005 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Engel, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 75

    J. Engel, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 75

  6. [14]

    R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell, A. Breier, A. Brinson, K. Chrysalidis, T. Co- colios, B. Cooper,et al., Nature581, 396 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Udrescu, A

    S. Udrescu, A. Brinson, R. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell, A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis,et al., Physical Review Letters127, 033001 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Udrescu, S

    S.-M. Udrescu, S. G. Wilkins, A. Breier, M. Athanasakis- Kaklamanakis, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, M. Bissell, C. Binnersley,et al., Nature Physics20, 202 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Wilkins, S

    S. Wilkins, S. Udrescu, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, R. Garcia Ruiz, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, M. Bis- sell, A. Breier, A. Brinson,et al., Science390, 386 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Wilkins, H

    S. Wilkins, H. Perrett, S. Udrescu, A. Kyuberis, L. Paˇ steka, M. Au, I. Beloˇ sevi´ c, R. Berger, C. Binnersley, M. Bissell,et al., Phys. Rev. Res.8, L012012 (2026)

    2026

  11. [19]

    C. J. Conn, P. Yu, M. I. Howard, Y. Yang, C. Zhang, A. Jadbabaie, A. Gorou, A. N. Gaiser, T. C. Steimle, L. Cheng,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08368 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Udrescu, D

    S.-M. Udrescu, D. A. Torres, and R. F. Garcia Ruiz, Physical Review Research6, 013128 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Nature Physics20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Barry, D

    J. Barry, D. McCarron, E. Norrgard, M. Steinecker, and D. DeMille, Nature512, 286 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    J. J. Burau, P. Aggarwal, K. Mehling, and J. Ye, Physical Review Letters130, 193401 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Truppe, H

    S. Truppe, H. Williams, M. Hambach, L. Caldwell, N. Fitch, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, and M. Tarbutt, Nature Physics13, 1173 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    J. E. Padilla-Castillo, J. Cai, P. Agarwal, P. Kukreja, R. Thomas, B. G. Sartakov, S. Truppe, G. Meijer, and S. C. Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 243401 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    J. J. Park, Y.-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Nature Physics19, 1567 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Miller, A

    C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Nature633, 332 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Nature631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature637, 821 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Nature 614, 64 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Nature628, 282 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Nature637, 827 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Kondov, C.-H

    S. Kondov, C.-H. Lee, K. Leung, C. Liedl, I. Majew- ska, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky, Nature Physics 15, 1118 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    J. C. Shaw, J. C. Schnaubelt, and D. J. McCarron, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042041 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    H. J. Kimble, Physica Scripta1998, 127 (1998)

    1998

  30. [38]

    Haroche, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1083 (2013)

    S. Haroche, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 1083 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Yano and T

    Y. Yano and T. Motobayashi, Nuclear Physics News17, 5 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    Glasmacher, B

    T. Glasmacher, B. Sherrill, W. Nazarewicz, A. Gade, P. Mantica, J. Wei, G. Bollen, and B. Bull, Nuclear Physics News27, 28 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    M. J. Borge and B. Jonson, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics44, 044011 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    R. J. Thompson, G. Rempe, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1132 (1992)

    1992

  35. [43]

    Pinkse, T

    P. Pinkse, T. Fischer, P. Maunz, and G. Rempe, Nature 404, 365 (2000)

    2000

  36. [44]

    K. M. Fortier, S. Y. Kim, M. J. Gibbons, P. Ahmadi, and M. S. Chapman, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 233601 (2007)

    2007

  37. [45]

    Terraciano, R

    M. Terraciano, R. Olson Knell, D. Norris, J. Jing, A. Fern´ andez, and L. Orozco, Nature Physics5, 480 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuleti´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 073602 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    K. C. Cox, G. P. Greve, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thomp- son, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 093602 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Nature529, 505 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S

    E. Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. F. Adiy- atullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, B. Braverman, A. Kawasaki, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao,et al., Nature588, 414 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis, and M. Schleier-Smith, Nature600, 630 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    J. M. Robinson, M. Miklos, Y. M. Tso, C. J. Kennedy, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, J. K. Thompson, and J. Ye, Na- ture Physics20, 208 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Shadmany, A

    D. Shadmany, A. Kumar, A. Soper, L. Palm, C. Yin, H. Ando, B. Li, L. Taneja, M. Jaffe, S. David, and J. Si- mon, Science Advances11, eads8171 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Brennecke, T

    F. Brennecke, T. Donner, S. Ritter, T. Bourdel, M. K¨ ohl, and T. Esslinger, Nature450, 268 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163601 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    K. Roux, H. Konishi, V. Helson, and J.-P. Brantut, Na- ture Communications11, 2974 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    B. L. Lev, A. Vukics, E. R. Hudson, B. C. Sawyer, P. Domokos, H. Ritsch, and J. Ye, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 023402 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Y. Lu, S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, and L. W. Cheuk, Nature Physics20, 389 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Jorapur, T

    V. Jorapur, T. K. Langin, Q. Wang, G. Zheng, and D. De- Mille, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 163403 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    [59– 70]

    See Supplemental Material below for details about the theoretical model, numerical estimations, conveyor belt MOT, and microwave transfers, which includes Refs. [59– 70]

  52. [60]

    G. K. Li, C. Hallas, and J. M. Doyle, New J. Phys.27, 7 043002 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Hallas, G

    C. Hallas, G. K. Li, N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 133402 (2026)

    2026

  54. [62]

    S. S. Yu, J. You, Y. Bao, L. Anderegg, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, D. Lim, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni,et al., Nature Communications (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Z. Zeng, S. Yang, S. Deng, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 073402 (2026)

    2026

  56. [64]

    Sawaoka, A

    H. Sawaoka, A. Nasir, A. Lunstad, M. Li, J. Mango, Z. D. Lasner, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013100 (2026)

    2026

  57. [65]

    Wang,Laser Cooling, Trapping, and Coherent Con- trol of Strontium Monofluoride Molecules, Ph.D

    Q. Wang,Laser Cooling, Trapping, and Coherent Con- trol of Strontium Monofluoride Molecules, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    H. J. Williams, L. Caldwell, N. J. Fitch, S. Truppe, J. Rodewald, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tar- butt, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 163201 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Anderegg, N

    L. Anderegg, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, P. Robichaud, A. Jadbabaie, J. M. Doyle, and N. R. Hutzler, Science 382, 665 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Norrgard,Magneto-optical trapping of diatomic molecules, Ph.D

    E. Norrgard,Magneto-optical trapping of diatomic molecules, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    Colarusso, B

    P. Colarusso, B. Guo, K.-Q. Zhang, and P. Bernath, Jour- nal of Molecular Spectroscopy175, 158 (1996)

    1996

  63. [71]

    Jorapur,Towards a Bose-Einstein Condensate of SrF Molecules, Ph.D

    V. Jorapur,Towards a Bose-Einstein Condensate of SrF Molecules, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    eEDM collaboration, P

    N. eEDM collaboration, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, P. A. Haase, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann,et al., The European Physical Journal D72, 1 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Verma, A

    M. Verma, A. M. Jayich, and A. C. Vutha, Physical Re- view Letters125, 153201 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, D. R. Glenn, and D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 223001 (2009)

    2009

  67. [75]

    Tanji-Suzuki, I

    H. Tanji-Suzuki, I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, M. Cetina, A. T. Grier, J. Simon, and V. Vuleti´ c, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 60, edited by E. Arimondo, P. Berman, and C. Lin (Academic P...

    2011

  68. [76]

    Duan,Enhanced light-atom interaction in an optical resonator, Ph.D

    Y. Duan,Enhanced light-atom interaction in an optical resonator, Ph.D. thesis (2020)

    2020

  69. [77]

    Zhang, R

    H. Zhang, R. McConnell, S. ´Cuk, Q. Lin, M. H. Schleier- Smith, I. D. Leroux, and V. Vuleti´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 133603 (2012)

    2012

  70. [78]

    Z. Chen, J. G. Bohnet, J. M. Weiner, K. C. Cox, and J. K. Thompson, Physical Review A89, 043837 (2014)

    2014

  71. [79]

    Z. Li, B. Braverman, S. Colombo, C. Shu, A. Kawasaki, A. F. Adiyatullin, E. Pedrozo-Pe˜ nafiel, E. Mendez, and V. Vuleti´ c, PRX Quantum3, 020308 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    T. E. Wall, J. F. Kanem, J. J. Hudson, B. E. Sauer, D. Cho, M. G. Boshier, E. A. Hinds, and M. R. Tarbutt, Phys. Rev. A78, 062509 (2008)

    2008

  73. [81]

    R. W. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. Ford, A. Munley, and H. Ward, Applied Physics B 31, 97 (1983)

    1983

  74. [82]

    M. L. Peters, G. Wang, D. C. Spierings, N. Drucker, B. Hu, M.-W. Chen, Y.-T. Chen, and V. Vuleti´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 093402 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Jadbabaie, S

    A. Jadbabaie, S. Ebadi, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, N. R. Hut- zler, A. M. Jayich, and J. T. Singh, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.12767 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Morigi, P

    G. Morigi, P. W. Pinkse, M. Kowalewski, and R. de Vivie-Riedle, Physical review letters99, 073001 (2007)

    2007

  77. [85]

    Bowden, A

    W. Bowden, A. Vianello, I. R. Hill, M. Schioppo, and R. Hobson, Phys. Rev. X10, 041052 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    Karman, M

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Nature Physics20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. Hazzard, Nature Physics20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    T. K. Langin, V. Jorapur, Y. Zhu, Q. Wang, and D. De- Mille, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 163201 (2021)

    2021

  81. [89]

    Lyu and M

    Q. Lyu and M. Tarbutt, arXiv:2601.21097 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  82. [90]

    four-frequency

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, S. J. Li, C. L. Welsh, and L. W. Cheuk, Phys. Rev. X15, 031018 (2025). 8 Supplemental Materials: Non-destructive cavity readout of molecules for precision measurements Alejandro Salas-Estrada1,∗ Silviu-Marian Udrescu2,3,∗ , Geoffrey Zheng3 , Qian Wang3 , ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.