Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 83 references

The ergotropy-to-energy ratio in quantum batteries approaches unity at least as fast as 1/N with battery number.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 15:57 UTC pith:O32PN2WJ

load-bearing objection The paper proves a universal 1/N scaling for the ergotropy-to-energy ratio in collective quantum battery charging, independent of microscopic details, with finite-N bounds and faster rates under asymptotic purity. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.10054 v1 pith:O32PN2WJ submitted 2026-06-08 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Scaling law of asymptotic freedom in collective charging of quantum batteries

Gentaro Watanabe , Chunlin Chen , B. Prasanna Venkatesh This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum batteriescollective chargingergotropyasymptotic freedomscaling lawquantum thermodynamicsenergy extraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves a universal scaling law for collective charging of quantum batteries that holds independent of microscopic details. It shows the ratio of extractable work (ergotropy) to total stored energy converges to one at a rate no slower than 1/N as the number of batteries N increases. This establishes generic asymptotic freedom in the charging process. A reader would care because the result supplies concrete finite-N bounds and identifies regimes where convergence accelerates to power laws steeper than 1/N or even exponential in N squared. The work therefore supplies both a generic guarantee and pathways to faster performance.

Core claim

We establish a universal scaling law for collective charging of quantum batteries, independent of microscopic details. We prove that the ergotropy-to-energy ratio approaches unity at least as fast as ∼N^{-1} with the number of batteries N, implying generic asymptotic freedom. We further show how the universal 1/N scaling can be overcome: when the battery state becomes asymptotically pure, the convergence can be substantially faster, including ∼N^{-b} with b>1 and even exponential scaling in N^2. Rigorous finite-N upper and lower bounds on the ergotropy-to-energy ratio are further derived, providing nonasymptotic guarantees for the universal 1/N scaling.

What carries the argument

The ergotropy-to-energy ratio, whose asymptotic approach to unity is bounded by a quantity independent of microscopic details of the interaction Hamiltonian or initial state.

Load-bearing premise

The collective charging dynamics and ergotropy definition make the ratio governed by a quantity whose scaling with N can be bounded without reference to specific microscopic details.

What would settle it

An explicit collective-charging Hamiltonian and initial state for which the ergotropy-to-energy ratio either remains bounded away from unity or approaches unity slower than any multiple of 1/N as N grows would falsify the claimed universal scaling.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Finite-N upper and lower bounds supply nonasymptotic performance guarantees for any number of batteries.
  • When the collective state approaches purity, the ratio can converge faster than 1/N, including power laws with exponent greater than 1 or exponential in N squared.
  • The result implies generic asymptotic freedom across collective charging protocols.
  • The 1/N scaling is the generic lower bound; deviations occur only under additional purity conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers of quantum energy storage could use the 1/N bound as a baseline efficiency target for large arrays.
  • The purity condition for faster scaling suggests a possible link between state purity and extractable-work efficiency in other many-body systems.
  • Numerical checks on small-N models could verify the finite-N bounds before experimental tests.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes a universal scaling law for collective charging of quantum batteries, independent of microscopic details of the Hamiltonian and initial state. It proves that the ergotropy-to-energy ratio approaches unity at least as fast as ∼N^{-1} with battery number N (implying asymptotic freedom), derives rigorous finite-N upper and lower bounds on the ratio, and shows that faster convergence (N^{-b} with b>1 or exponential in N^2) is possible when the battery state becomes asymptotically pure.

Significance. If the central mathematical bounds hold under the stated generality, the result supplies a parameter-free, non-asymptotic guarantee on collective charging performance that is broadly applicable in quantum thermodynamics. The explicit finite-N bounds and the identification of purity as a route to super-1/N scaling constitute concrete, falsifiable contributions that could inform both theory and experiment.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (or the section containing the main theorem): the proof that the 1/N lower bound on the convergence rate holds independently of microscopic details must explicitly delineate the allowed class of interaction Hamiltonians (e.g., whether two-body, all-to-all, or restricted to certain symmetry sectors) and initial states; any hidden restriction would undermine the universality claim.
  2. [Finite-N bounds section] The finite-N upper and lower bounds (stated in the abstract and presumably derived after the asymptotic result): these bounds are load-bearing for the non-asymptotic guarantee; the manuscript should verify that they remain valid when the collective charging protocol includes realistic decoherence or when the battery Hilbert space dimension grows with N.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for ergotropy and total energy should be introduced once and used consistently; the abstract uses “ergotropy-to-energy ratio” without defining the symbols that appear in the theorems.
  2. Comparison to prior collective-charging literature (e.g., works on Dicke-model batteries or mean-field charging) is mentioned only briefly; a short dedicated paragraph would clarify the novelty of the 1/N result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible to enhance clarity without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (or the section containing the main theorem): the proof that the 1/N lower bound on the convergence rate holds independently of microscopic details must explicitly delineate the allowed class of interaction Hamiltonians (e.g., whether two-body, all-to-all, or restricted to certain symmetry sectors) and initial states; any hidden restriction would undermine the universality claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit delineation strengthens the universality claim. The proof in §3 applies to arbitrary interaction Hamiltonians (including two-body, all-to-all, and higher-order terms) acting on the collective battery Hilbert space, with no restriction to specific symmetry sectors, and for arbitrary initial states (pure or mixed). In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph at the start of §3 stating these assumptions explicitly, together with a brief justification that the bounding technique relies only on the collective nature of the charging process and not on further details of the Hamiltonian. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Finite-N bounds section] The finite-N upper and lower bounds (stated in the abstract and presumably derived after the asymptotic result): these bounds are load-bearing for the non-asymptotic guarantee; the manuscript should verify that they remain valid when the collective charging protocol includes realistic decoherence or when the battery Hilbert space dimension grows with N.

    Authors: The finite-N bounds are derived for closed unitary dynamics with fixed local Hilbert-space dimension per battery. Extending the analysis to open systems (decoherence) or N-dependent local dimensions would require an entirely different mathematical framework and is outside the scope of the present work, which focuses on ideal collective charging. We will add a clarifying remark in the finite-N bounds section stating these modeling assumptions and noting that robustness under decoherence remains an open question for future study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents a mathematical proof establishing a universal 1/N lower bound on the ergotropy-to-energy ratio for collective charging, asserted to hold independently of microscopic details of the Hamiltonian and initial state. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatzes are visible in the provided abstract that would reduce the claimed scaling to a definitional input or prior self-referential result. The derivation is described as self-contained against general properties of ergotropy and collective dynamics, with additional finite-N bounds and faster scalings under purity conditions presented as extensions rather than forced by construction. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular proof paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The result is claimed to hold independently of microscopic details, suggesting reliance on standard quantum mechanics and ergotropy definitions without additional ad-hoc constructs visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5651 in / 1172 out tokens · 13821 ms · 2026-06-27T15:57:14.052770+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We establish a universal scaling law for collective charging of quantum batteries, independent of microscopic details. We prove that the ergotropy-to-energy ratio approaches unity at least as fast as $\sim N^{-1}$ with the number of batteries $N$, implying generic asymptotic freedom. We further show how the universal $1/N$ scaling can be overcome: when the battery state becomes asymptotically pure, the convergence can be substantially faster, including $\sim N^{-b}$ with $b>1$ and even exponential scaling in $N^2$. Rigorous finite-$N$ upper and lower bounds on the ergotropy-to-energy ratio are further derived, providing nonasymptotic guarantees for the universal $1/N$ scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10054 by B. Prasanna Venkatesh, Chunlin Chen, Gentaro Watanabe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Emergence of asymptotic freedom in collective quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: with ωB = ωC. For the Dicke model, the coupling Hamilto￾nian is given by Hˆ BC = g √ N (aˆ † + aˆ)(Sˆ+ + Sˆ−), while for the TC model, Hˆ BC = g √ N (aˆ †Sˆ− + aˆSˆ+). Here, g is the coupling strength, and Sˆ± ≡ PN i=1 sˆ±,i and Sˆ z ≡ PN i=1 sˆz,i are the col￾lective operators satisfying the SU(2) algebra, [Sˆ z , Sˆ±] = ±Sˆ± and [Sˆ+, Sˆ−] = 2Sˆ z . We consider unitary charging from the ground state of a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Demonstration of fast convergence to asymptotic free [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Example of energy levels for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    For the case where the residual population vanishes in the large-Nlimit, i.e.,δ ∞ =0, Eq

    package. For the case where the residual population vanishes in the large-Nlimit, i.e.,δ ∞ =0, Eq. (25) leads directly to the corol- lary: Corollary 2—If ˆρB becomes pure in the limitN→∞, i.e., δ∞ =0, the ratioE B/EB can asymptotically approach unity faster than∼1/N, as the deviation scales as∆δ(N)/Nwith ∆δ(N)→0. Example 2: Convergence to asymptotic freed...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, and S. Vinjanampathy, Quantum Batteries, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Funda- mental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 207–225

    2018

  3. [3]

    Bhattacharjee and A

    S. Bhattacharjee and A. Dutta, Quantum thermal machines and batteries, Eur. Phys. J. B94, 239 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum thermody- namic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental re- ality, A VS Quantum Sci.4, 027101 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    J. Q. Quach, G. Cerullo, and T. Virgili, Quantum batteries: The future of energy storage?, Joule7, 2195 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Ferraro, F

    D. Ferraro, F. Cavaliere, M. G. Genoni, G. Benenti, and M. Sas- setti, Opportunities and challenges of quantum batteries, Nat. Rev. Phys.8, 115 (2026). 6

    2026

  8. [8]

    A. E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, and Th. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems, Euro- phys. Lett.67, 565 (2004)

    2004

  9. [9]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    K. V . Hovhannisyan, M. Perarnau-Llobet, M. Huber, and A. Ac´ın, Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 240401 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, Dae- monic ergotropy: enhanced work extraction from quantum cor- relations, npj Quantum Inf.3, 12 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, M. Campisi, V . Giovan- netti, and M. Polini, Extractable Work, the Role of Correla- tions, and Asymptotic Freedom in Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 047702 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, V . Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Quantum versus classical many-body batteries, Phys. Rev. B99, 205437 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    L. P. Garc´ıa-Pintos, A. Hamma, and A. del Campo, Fluctuations in Extractable Work Bound the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 040601 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    F. H. Kamin, F. T. Tabesh, S. Salimi, and A. C. Santos, Entan- glement, coherence, and charging process of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E102, 052109 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Francica, F

    G. Francica, F. C. Binder, G. Guarnieri, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Quantum Coherence and Ergotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180603 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    H.-L. Shi, S. Ding, Q.-K. Wan, X.-H. Wang, and W.-L. Yang, Entanglement, Coherence, and Extractable Work in Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130602 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Salvia, G

    R. Salvia, G. De Palma, and V . Giovannetti, Optimal local work extraction from bipartite quantum systems in the presence of Hamiltonian couplings, Phys. Rev. A107, 012405 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Castellano, D

    R. Castellano, D. Farina, V . Giovannetti, and A. Acin, Extended Local Ergotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 150402 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Gyhm and U

    J.-Y . Gyhm and U. R. Fischer, Beneficial and detrimental en- tanglement for quantum battery charging, A VS Quantum Sci. 6, 012001 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Wang and F.-Q

    C.-J. Wang and F.-Q. Dou, Ergotropy in Quantum Batteries, arXiv:2512.21855 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Farina, G

    D. Farina, G. M. Andolina, A. Mari, M. Polini, and V . Giovan- netti, Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: an open-system approach, Phys. Rev. B99, 035421 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Barra, Dissipative Charging of a Quantum Battery, Phys

    F. Barra, Dissipative Charging of a Quantum Battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Pirmoradian and K

    F. Pirmoradian and K. Mølmer, Aging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A100, 043833 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    J. Liu, D. Segal, and G. Hanna, Loss-Free Excitonic Quantum Battery, J. Phys. Chem. C123, 18303 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    J. Q. Quach and W. J. Munro, Using Dark States to Charge and Stabilize Open Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 024092 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    F. T. Tabesh, F. H. Kamin, and S. Salimi, Environment- mediated charging process of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. A102, 052223 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    F. H. Kamin, F. T. Tabesh, S. Salimi, F. Kheirandish, and A. C. Santos, Non-Markovian effects on charging and self- discharging process of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.22, 083007 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    K. V . Hovhannisyan, F. Barra, and A. Imparato, Charging as- sisted by thermalization, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033413 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Carrega, A

    M. Carrega, A. Crescente, D. Ferraro, and M. Sassetti, Dissi- pative dynamics of an open quantum battery, New J. Phys.22, 083085 (2020)

    2020

  31. [31]

    Gherardini, F

    S. Gherardini, F. Campaioli, F. Caruso, and F. C. Binder, Sta- bilizing open quantum batteries by sequential measurements, Phys. Rev. Research2, 013095 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Caravelli, B

    F. Caravelli, B. Yan, L. P. Garc ´ıa-Pintos, and A. Hamma, En- ergy storage and coherence in closed and open quantum batter- ies, Quantum5, 505 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Ghosh, T

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, S. Mal, and A. Sen(De), Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise, Phys. Rev. A104, 032207 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and J. Prior, Charging a quantum battery with linear feedback control, Quantum5, 500 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Xu, H.-J

    K. Xu, H.-J. Zhu, G.-F. Zhang, and W.-M. Liu, Enhancing the performance of an open quantum battery via environment engi- neering, Phys. Rev. E104, 064143 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Morrone, M

    D. Morrone, M. A. C. Rossi, A. Smirne, and M. G. Genoni, Charging a quantum battery in a non-Markovian environment: a collisional model approach, Quantum Sci. Technol.8, 035007 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Morrone, M

    D. Morrone, M. A. C. Rossi, and M. G. Genoni, Daemonic ergotropy in continuously monitored open quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044073 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Centrone, L

    F. Centrone, L. Mancino, and M. Paternostro, Charging batter- ies with quantum squeezing, Phys. Rev. A108, 052213 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    R. R. Rodr´ıguez, B. Ahmadi, G. Su´arez, P. Mazurek, S. Barzan- jeh, and P. Horodecki, Optimal quantum control of charging quantum batteries, New J. Phys.26, 043004 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Non- reciprocal Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 210402 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Cavaliere, G

    F. Cavaliere, G. Gemme, G. Benenti, D. Ferraro, and M. Sas- setti, Dynamical blockade of a reservoir for optimal perfor- mances of a quantum battery, Commun. Phys.8, 76 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Song, J.-L

    W.-L. Song, J.-L. Wang, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.-H. An, Self-Discharging Mitigated Quantum Battery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020405 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Shastri, C

    R. Shastri, C. Jiang, G.-H. Xu, B. P. Venkatesh, and G. Watan- abe, Dephasing enabled fast charging of quantum batteries, npj Quantum Inf.11, 9 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, J. Keeling, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an organic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery, Sci. Adv.8, eabk3160 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    D. J. Tibben, E. Della Gaspera, J. van Embden, P. Reineck, J. Q. Quach, F. Campaioli, and D. E. G ´omez, Extending the Self- Discharge Time of Dicke Quantum Batteries Using Molecular Triplets, PRX Energy4, 023012 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Hymas, J

    K. Hymas, J. B. Muir, D. Tibben, J. van Embden, T. Hirai, C. J. Dunn, D. E. G ´omez, J. A. Hutchison, T. A. Smith, and J. Q. Quach, Superextensive electrical power from a quantum battery Light Sci. Appl.15, 168 (2026)

    2026

  47. [47]

    C.-K. Hu, J. Qiu, P. J. P. Souza, J. Yuan, Y . Zhou, L. Zhang, J. Chu, X. Pan, L. Hu, J. Li, Y . Xu, Y . Zhong, S. Liu, F. Yan, D. Tan, R. Bachelard, C. J. Villas-Boas, A. C. Santos, and D. Yu, Optimal charging of a superconducting quantum battery, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 045018 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Gemme, M

    G. Gemme, M. Grossi, D. Ferraro, S. Vallecorsa, and M. Sas- setti, IBM Quantum Platforms: A Quantum Battery Perspec- tive, Batteries8, 43 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Y . Ge, X. Yu, W. Xin, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, W. Zheng, S. Li, D. Lan, and Y . Yu, Efficient charging and discharging of a su- perconducting quantum battery through frequency-modulated driving, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 154002 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Li, S.-L

    L. Li, S.-L. Zhao, Y .-H. Shi, B.-J. Chen, X. Ruan, G.-H. Liang, 7 W.-P. Yuan, J.-C. Song, C.-L. Deng, Y . Liu, T.-M. Li, Z.-H. Liu, X.-Y . Guo, X. Song, K. Xu, H. Fan, Z. Xiang, and D. Zheng, Stable and efficient charging of superconducting capacitively shunted flux quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 054033 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Gemme, M

    G. Gemme, M. Grossi, S. Vallecorsa, M. Sassetti, and D. Fer- raro, Qutrit quantum battery: Comparing different charging protocols, Phys. Rev. Research6, 023091 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Z. Niu, Y . Wu, Y . Wang, X. Rong, and J. Du, Experimental Investigation of Coherent Ergotropy in a Single Spin System, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 180401 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Razzoli, G

    L. Razzoli, G. Gemme, I. Khomchenko, M. Sassetti, H. Ouer- dane, D. Ferraro, and G. Benenti, Cyclic solid-state quantum battery: thermodynamic characterization and quantum hard- ware simulation, Quantum Sci. Technol.10, 015064 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    S. N. Elyasi, M. A. C. Rossi, and M. G. Genoni, Experimental simulation of daemonic work extraction in open quantum bat- teries on a digital quantum computer, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025017 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Joshi and T

    J. Joshi and T. S. Mahesh, Experimental investigation of a quan- tum battery using star-topology NMR spin systems, Phys. Rev. A106, 042601 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    C. Cruz, M. F. Anka, M. S. Reis, R. Bachelard, and A. C. San- tos, Quantum battery based on quantum discord at room tem- perature, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 025020 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S

    I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S. E. Thomas, M. Maffei, S. C. Wein, M. Pont, N. Belabas, S. Prasad, H. Harouri, A. Lemaˆıtre, I. Sagnes, N. Somaschi, A. Auff `eves, and P. Senellart, Experi- mental Analysis of Energy Transfers between a Quantum Emit- ter and Light Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260401 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quanta- cell: powerful charging of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.17, 075015 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 150601 (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V . Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-Power Collective Charging of a Solid-State Quan- tum Battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    T. P. Le, J. Levinsen, K. Modi, M. M. Parish, and F. A. Pollock, Spin-chain model of a many-body quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A97, 022106 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    Juli `a-Farr´e, T

    S. Juli `a-Farr´e, T. Salamon, A. Riera, M. N. Bera, and M. Lewenstein, Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum bat- teries, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023113 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Rossini, G

    D. Rossini, G. M. Andolina, D. Rosa, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Quantum Advantage in the Charging Process of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236402 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    J.-Y . Gyhm, D. ˇSafr´anek, and D. Rosa, Quantum Charging Ad- vantage Cannot Be Extensive without Global Operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 140501 (2022)

    2022

  65. [65]

    Hokkyo and M

    A. Hokkyo and M. Ueda, Universal Upper Bound on Ergotropy and No-Go Theorem by the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypoth- esis, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 010406 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Watanabe, B

    G. Watanabe, B. P. Venkatesh, P. Talkner, M.-J. Hwang, and A. del Campo, Quantum Statistical Enhancement of the Collec- tive Performance of Multiple Bosonic Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 210603 (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    Peng, W.-B

    L. Peng, W.-B. He, S. Chesi, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-W. Guan, Lower and upper bounds of quantum battery power in multiple central spin systems, Phys. Rev. A103, 052220 (2021)

    2021

  68. [68]

    L. Gao, C. Cheng, W.-B. He, R. Mondaini, X.-W. Guan, and H.- Q. Lin, Scaling of energy and power in a large quantum battery- charger model, Phys. Rev. Research4, 043150 (2022)

    2022

  69. [69]

    Mayo and A

    F. Mayo and A. J. Roncaglia, Collective effects and quantum coherence in dissipative charging of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. A105, 062203 (2022)

    2022

  70. [70]

    Y . Ueki, S. Kamimura, Y . Matsuzaki, K. Yoshida, and Y . Tokura, Quantum Battery Based on Superabsorption, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 124002 (2022)

    2022

  71. [71]

    Zhang and M

    X. Zhang and M. Blaauboer, Enhanced energy transfer in a Dicke quantum battery, Front. Phys.10, 1097564 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    Zhang, S

    D. Zhang, S. Ma, Y . Jiang, Y . Yu, G. Jin, and A. Chen, Quantum battery with interactive atomic collective charging, Phys. Rev. A110, 032211 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Li and N

    J. Li and N. Wu, Collective charging of an organic quantum battery, Phys. Rev. E111, 044118 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    Ito and G

    K. Ito and G. Watanabe, Collectively enhanced high-power and high-capacity charging of quantum batteries via quantum heat engines, arXiv:2008.0708 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Yang, F.-M

    D.-L. Yang, F.-M. Yang, and F.-Q. Dou, Three-level Dicke quantum battery, Phys. Rev. B109, 235432 (2024)

    2024

  76. [76]

    Pokhrel and J

    S. Pokhrel and J. Gea-Banacloche, Large Collective Power En- hancement in Dissipative Charging of a Quantum Battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 130401 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    Canzio, V

    A. Canzio, V . Cavina, M. Polini, and V . Giovannetti, Single- atom dissipation and dephasing in Dicke and Tavis-Cummings quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. A111, 022222 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Purkait, B

    C. Purkait, B. P. Venkatesh, and G. Watanabe, Asymptotic free- dom in the dephased charging of quantum batteries, J. Phy. A: Math. Theor.59, 025301 (2026)

    2026

  79. [79]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B ¨uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys.4, 878 (2008)

    2008

  80. [80]

    Watanabe and H

    G. Watanabe and H. M ¨akel¨a, Dissipation-induced squeezing, Phys. Rev. A85, 023604 (2012)

    2012

Showing first 80 references.