Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 cited by

Stacking switching between correlation-protected radial Rashba field and persistent spin textures in graphene encapsulated by 1T-TaS$_2$ monolayers

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Stacking order in graphene-1T-TaS2 heterostructures switches between a radial Rashba spin pattern and a persistent out-of-plane spin texture.

desk verdict This paper computes stacking-dependent proximity effects in graphene/1T-TaS2, finding AA stacking produces a near-pi/2 radial Rashba that makes unconventional REE dominate by ~35 while AA' gives out-of-plane persistent spin texture, plus a much larger orbital Hall response with plateau. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12239 v1 pith:UG7TBNGH submitted 2026-06-10 cond-mat.mes-hall

Juraj Mnich , Marko Milivojević , Martin Gmitra This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords grapheneRashbaeffectpersistentspintextureheterostructureorbitalHallstackingorderproximityspin-orbitcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the choice of encapsulation stacking between graphene and 1T-TaS2 monolayers controls two distinct spin and transport regimes. In asymmetrical stacking the Rashba fields from each interface add constructively to produce a radial spin pattern, which makes an unconventional charge-to-spin response dominate the conventional one. In symmetrical stacking mirror symmetry instead locks spins into a stable out-of-plane texture. The same calculations show the orbital Hall response is three orders of magnitude larger than the spin Hall response and remains finite inside the induced gaps where the spin Hall response drops to zero.

What carries the argument

Stacking-dependent interference of proximity-induced Rashba fields from the two 1T-TaS2 interfaces, which either add to a radial pattern or are constrained by mirror symmetry to an out-of-plane texture.

What would settle it

Transport measurements showing that the unconventional Rashba-Edelstein effect does not exceed the conventional response by a large factor in AA stacking, or that spin Hall conductivity remains nonzero inside the proximity gaps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the asymmetrical (AA) stacking, proximity fields from both interfaces constructively interfere, yielding a cumulative Rashba phase of nearly π/2. This pure radial Rashba spin pattern leads to the unconventional Rashba-Edelstein effect, which robustly dominates over the conventional response by a factor of 35 across a wide energy range. Conversely, the symmetrical (AA') stacking preserves a horizontal mirror symmetry, establishing a stable, purely out-of-plane persistent spin texture. The computed orbital Hall effect surpasses the spin Hall effect by three orders of magnitude, with a finite plateau inside the proximity-induced gaps while the spin Hall conductivity vanishes.

Load-bearing premise

First-principles calculations and the Kubo formalism accurately capture the proximity-induced fields and transport without significant errors from approximations or neglected effects.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates graphene encapsulated by 1T-TaS2 monolayers in the CDW phase using first-principles calculations, tight-binding modeling, and the Kubo formalism. It claims that stacking order controls distinct transport regimes: asymmetrical (AA) stacking produces constructive interference of proximity fields yielding a pure radial Rashba spin texture with cumulative phase near π/2, causing the unconventional Rashba-Edelstein effect to dominate the conventional response by a factor of 35 over a wide energy range; symmetrical (AA') stacking preserves horizontal mirror symmetry and yields a stable out-of-plane persistent spin texture. The orbital Hall effect exceeds the spin Hall effect by three orders of magnitude, with a finite plateau inside proximity-induced gaps while spin Hall conductivity vanishes.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the work establishes stacking as a deterministic control knob for realizing pure radial Rashba textures, robust unconventional REE, and orbital-dominated transport in a single van der Waals platform. The reported factor-of-35 dominance and three-order-of-magnitude OHE/SHE contrast, together with the gap-plateau behavior, would constitute concrete, falsifiable predictions for spin- and orbitronic device design.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods and Results (proximity-field and transport sections)] The headline claims (cumulative Rashba phase of nearly π/2, REE dominance by exactly 35, OHE/SHE ratio of 10^3) rest on the accuracy of the DFT-derived proximity fields in the CDW-reconstructed 1T-TaS2/graphene interfaces. No convergence tests with respect to supercell size for the CDW reconstruction, no comparisons to hybrid functionals or GW, and no experimental benchmarks for the stacking-dependent spin textures are reported; this directly affects the reliability of the constructive-interference assertion in AA stacking and the numerical dominance factors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. We respond point-by-point to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results (proximity-field and transport sections)] The headline claims (cumulative Rashba phase of nearly π/2, REE dominance by exactly 35, OHE/SHE ratio of 10^3) rest on the accuracy of the DFT-derived proximity fields in the CDW-reconstructed 1T-TaS2/graphene interfaces. No convergence tests with respect to supercell size for the CDW reconstruction, no comparisons to hybrid functionals or GW, and no experimental benchmarks for the stacking-dependent spin textures are reported; this directly affects the reliability of the constructive-interference assertion in AA stacking and the numerical dominance factors.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies the absence of reported convergence tests, hybrid/GW comparisons, and experimental benchmarks. We agree these points bear on the quantitative reliability of the reported factors. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit convergence tests with respect to supercell size and k-point density to substantiate the stability of the proximity fields and the resulting spin textures in both stackings. Hybrid-functional and GW calculations remain computationally prohibitive for the large CDW supercells (>100 atoms), so we will note this limitation while observing that the PBE results are consistent with prior DFT studies on graphene/TMD interfaces. As a purely theoretical work, experimental benchmarks cannot be provided, but the manuscript supplies concrete, falsifiable predictions for future measurements. We will qualify the numerical dominance factors (35 and three orders of magnitude) as DFT-PBE estimates and add a brief methods discussion of these constraints. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard external methods

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on first-principles DFT calculations, tight-binding modeling, and Kubo formalism applied to the heterostructure. These are standard computational tools whose outputs are not defined in terms of the target quantities (Rashba phase, REE dominance factor, OHE/SHE ratio) by construction within the work. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness theorems or ansatzes, no parameters are fitted to subsets and then relabeled as predictions, and no renaming of known results occurs. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; standard DFT and transport formalisms are invoked but not detailed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stacking switching between correlation-protected radial Rashba field and persistent spin textures in graphene encapsulated by 1T-TaS$_2$ monolayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UG7TBNGH

@misc{pith2026260612239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stacking switching between correlation-protected radial Rashba field and persistent spin textures in graphene encapsulated by 1T-TaS$_2$ monolayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UG7TBNGH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12239}
}
abstract

We investigate the electronic structure, spin textures, and charge to spin/orbital transport in graphene encapsulated by 1T-TaS$_{2}$ monolayers in the charge density wave phase. Using first-principles calculations, tight-binding modeling, and the Kubo formalism, we show that the encapsulation stacking dictates fundamentally distinct transport regimes. In the asymmetrical (AA) stacking, proximity fields from both interfaces constructively interfere, yielding a cumulative Rashba phase of nearly $\pi/2$. This pure radial Rashba spin pattern leads to the unconventional Rashba-Edelstein effect, which robustly dominates over the conventional response by a factor of 35 across a wide energy range. Conversely, the symmetrical (AA') stacking preserves a horizontal mirror symmetry, establishing a stable, purely out-of-plane persistent spin texture. Furthermore, the computed orbital Hall effect is exceptionally efficient, surpassing the spin Hall effect by three orders of magnitude. Within the proximity-induced spectral gaps, the orbital Hall conductivity exhibits a finite plateau, whereas the spin Hall conductivity vanishes. Our findings establish graphene encapsulated heterostructures as a promising system for realizing distinct charge to spin and charge to orbital interconversion regimes determined by the choice of stacking order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12239 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structural model of encapsulated graphene between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Low-energy electronic band structure and spin ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Charge to spin conversion coefficients in graphene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Calculated linear-response transport coefficients as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Layer-selective chirality switch in bilayer graphene intercalated by Janus monolayers

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DFT and tight-binding calculations show that Janus monolayers intercalated in bilayer graphene induce opposite Rashba spin-orbit coupling signs in the two graphene layers, enabling layer-selective spin current reversa...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Nature499, 419 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    P. Wang, C. Jia, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Matter4, 552 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Review of Modern Physics76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    W. Han, R. K. Kawakami, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Nature Nanotechnology9, 794 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, and S. O. Valenzuela, Nature Nanotechnology16, 856 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Kurebayashi, J

    H. Kurebayashi, J. H. Garcia, S. Khan, J. Sinova, and S. Roche, Nature Reviews Physics4, 150 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Kurpas, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Nature Reviews Physics7, 255 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Gmitra and J

    M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Physical Review B92, 155403 (2015)

    2015

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Gmitra, D

    M. Gmitra, D. Kochan, P. Högl, and J. Fabian, Physical Review B93, 155104 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Gmitra and J

    M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 146401 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    T. P. Cysne, L. M. Canonico, M. Costa, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, npj Spintronics3, 39 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Avsar, J

    A. Avsar, J. Y. Tan, T. Taychatanapat, J. Balakrishnan, G. K. W. Koon, Y. Yeo, J. Lahiri, A. Carvalho, A. S. Rodin, E.C.T.O’Farrell, G.Eda, A.H.CastroNeto,and B. Özyilmaz, Nature Communications5, 4875 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, T. Frank, and J. Fabian, Physical Review B94, 155441 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Zollner and J

    K. Zollner and J. Fabian, Phys. Rev. B104, 075126 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    K.Zollner, S.M.João, B.Nikolić,andJ.Fabian,Physical Review B108, 235166 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Milivojević, M

    M. Milivojević, M. Gmitra, M. Kurpas, I. Štich, and J. Fabian, 2D Materials11, 035036 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Fülöp, A

    B. Fülöp, A. Márffy, S. Zihlmann, M. Gmitra, E. Tóvári, B. Szentpéteri, M. Kedves, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Fabian, C. Schönenberger, P. Makk, and S. Csonka, npj 2D Materials and Applications5, 82 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    David, P

    A. David, P. Rakyta, A. Kormányos, and G. Burkard, Physical Review B100, 085412 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Naimer, K

    T. Naimer, K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Phys- ical Review B104, 195156 (2021)

    2021

  12. [21]

    Veneri, D

    A. Veneri, D. T. S. Perkins, C. G. Péterfalvi, and A. Fer- reira, Physical Review B106, L081406 (2022)

    2022

  13. [22]

    S. Lee, D. J. P. de Sousa, Y.-K. Kwon, F. de Juan, Z. Chi, F. Casanova, and T. Low, Phys. Rev. B106, 165420 (2022)

    2022

  14. [23]

    Pasquier and O

    D. Pasquier and O. V. Yazyev, Physical Review B100, 201103 (2019)

    2019

  15. [24]

    Wilson, F

    J. Wilson, F. Di Salvo, and S. Mahajan, Advances in Physics24, 117 (1975)

    1975

  16. [25]

    Brouwer and F

    R. Brouwer and F. Jellinek, Physica B+C99, 51 (1980)

    1980

  17. [26]

    D. C. Miller, S. D. Mahanti, and P. M. Duxbury, Physical Review B97, 045133 (2018)

    2018

  18. [27]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Si, C.-S. Lian, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, Journal of Materials Chemistry C8, 9742 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    Jiang, T

    T. Jiang, T. Hu, G.-D. Zhao, Y. Li, S. Xu, C. Liu, Y. Cui, and W. Ren, Phys. Rev. B104, 075147 (2021)

    2021

  20. [29]

    Tresca and M

    C. Tresca and M. Calandra, 2D Materials6, 035041 (2019)

    2019

  21. [30]

    Calandra, Phys

    M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026401 (2018)

    2018

  22. [31]

    L. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Huang, X. Song, Q. Zhang, Z. Huang, Y. Hou, Y. Chen, Z. Xu, T. Zhang, X. Wu, J. Sun, Y. Huang, F. Zheng, X. Li, Y. Yao, H.-J. Gao, and Y. Wang, Nature Communications12, 1978 (2021)

    1978

  23. [32]

    M.Liu, J.Leveillee, S.Lu, J.Yu, H.Kim, C.Tian, Y.Shi, K. Lai, C. Zhang, F. Giustino, and C.-K. Shih, Science Advances7, eabi6339 (2021)

    2021

  24. [33]

    K.Szałowski, M.Milivojević, D.Kochan,andM.Gmitra, 2D Materials10, 025013 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    Z. Chi, S. Lee, H. Yang, E. Dolan, C. K. Safeer, J. Ingla-Aynés, F. Herling, N. Ontoso, B. Martín-García, M. Gobbi, T. Low, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Ad- vanced Materialsn/a, 2310768 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    Frank, P

    T. Frank, P. E. F. Junior, K. Zollner, and J. Fabian, Phys. Rev. B109, L241403 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    W.-H. Kang, M. Barth, A. Costa, A. Garcia-Ruiz, A. Mreńca-Kolasińska, M.-H. Liu, and D. Kochan, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 216201 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Przybysz, K

    P. Przybysz, K. Tenzin, B. Kilic, W. Kozłowski, P. J. Kowalczyk, P. Dabrowski, and J. Sławińska, Applied Physics Letters128, 062401 (2026)

    2026

  29. [38]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 066601 (2005)

    2005

  30. [39]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  31. [40]

    Dyakonov and V

    M. Dyakonov and V. Perel, Physics Letters A35, 459 (1971)

    1971

  32. [41]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  33. [42]

    P. Sahu, J. K. Bidika, B. Biswal, S. Satpathy, and B. R. K. Nanda, Phys. Rev. B110, 054403 (2024)

    2024

  34. [43]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137205 (2005)

    2005

  35. [44]

    Busch, I

    O. Busch, I. Mertig, and B. Göbel, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043052 (2023)

    2023

  36. [45]

    Bhowal and G

    S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B103, 195309 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Spijkerman, J

    A. Spijkerman, J. L. de Boer, A. Meetsma, G. A. Wiegers, and S. van Smaalen, Phys. Rev. B56, 13757 (1997)

    1997

  38. [47]

    Stahl, M

    Q. Stahl, M. Kusch, F. Heinsch, G. Garbarino, N. Kretzschmar, K. Hanff, K. Rossnagel, J. Geck, and T. Ritschel, Nature Communications11, 1247 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. M...

    2009

  40. [49]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Ger...

    2017

  41. [50]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Physical Review136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  42. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Re- view Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  43. [52]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  44. [53]

    Grimme, Journal of Computational Chemistry27, 1787 (2006)

    S. Grimme, Journal of Computational Chemistry27, 1787 (2006)

    2006

  45. [54]

    Barone, M

    V. Barone, M. Casarin, D. Forrer, M. Pavone, M. Sambi, and A. Vittadini, Journal of Computational Chemistry 30, 934 (2009)

    2009

  46. [55]

    Dal Corso, Computational Materials Science95, 337 (2014)

    A. Dal Corso, Computational Materials Science95, 337 (2014)

    2014

  47. [56]

    Bengtsson, Physical Review B59, 12301 (1999)

    L. Bengtsson, Physical Review B59, 12301 (1999)

    1999

  48. [57]

    Methfessel and A

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, Physical Review B40, 3616 (1989)

    1989

  49. [58]

    Kochan, M

    D. Kochan, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, inSpintronics V, Vol. 8461 (SPIE, 2012) pp. 64–75

    2012

  50. [59]

    Kochan, S

    D. Kochan, S. Irmer, and J. Fabian, Physical Review B 95, 165415 (2017)

    2017

  51. [60]

    Kubo, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1274–1277 (1956)

    R. Kubo, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1274–1277 (1956)

    1956

  52. [61]

    Kubo, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan12, 570–586 (1957)

    R. Kubo, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan12, 570–586 (1957)

    1957

  53. [62]

    Smrčka and P

    L. Smrčka and P. Středa, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics10, 2153 (1977)

    1977

  54. [63]

    Crépieux and P

    A. Crépieux and P. Bruno, Physical Review B64, 014416 (2001)

    2001

  55. [64]

    Bonbien and A

    V. Bonbien and A. Manchon, Physical Review B102, 085113 (2020)

    2020

  56. [65]

    Thonhauser, International Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

    T. Thonhauser, International Journal of Modern Physics B25, 1429 (2011)

    2011

  57. [66]

    Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  58. [67]

    Aryasetiawan and K

    F. Aryasetiawan and K. Karlsson, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids128, 87 (2019), spin-Orbit Coupled Materials

    2019

  59. [68]

    H. Lee, I. Baek, M. Sastges, Y. Mokrousov, H.- W. Lee, and D. Go, Anatomy of the modern the- ory of orbital magnetism from first-principles: term-by- term analysis in the gauge-covariant formalism (2026), arXiv:2603.19875 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 arXiv

  60. [69]

    A. Pezo, D. García Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Phys. Rev. B108, 075427 (2023)

    2023

  61. [70]

    S. Lee, D. J. P. de Sousa, Y.-K. Kwon, F. de Juan, Z. Chi, F.Casanova,andT.Low,PhysicalReviewB106,165420 (2022)

    2022

  62. [71]

    Freimuth, S

    F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov, Physical Re- view B90, 174423 (2014)

    2014

  63. [72]

    Železný, Y

    J. Železný, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Physical Review Letters119, 187204 (2017)

    2017

  64. [73]

    V. M. Edelstein, Solid State Communications73, 233–235 (1990)

    1990

  65. [74]

    A.Dyrdał, J.Barnaś,andV.K.Dugaev,PhysicalReview B89, 075422 (2014)

    2014

  66. [75]

    Offidani, M

    M. Offidani, M. Milletarì, R. Raimondi, and A. Ferreira, Physical Review Letters119, 196801 (2017)

    2017

  67. [76]

    T. S. Ghiasi, J. Ingla-Aynés, A. A. Kaverzin, and B. J. Van Wees, Nano Letters17, 7528 (2017)

    2017

  68. [77]

    C. G. Péterfalvi, A. David, P. Rakyta, G. Burkard, and A. Kormányos, Physical Review Research4, L022049 (2022)

    2022

  69. [78]

    H. Yang, B. Martín-García, J. Kimák, E. Schmoranze- rová, E. Dolan, Z. Chi, M. Gobbi, P. Němec, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Nature Materials23, 1502 (2024)

    2024

  70. [79]

    Ontoso, C

    N. Ontoso, C. K. Safeer, F. Herling, J. Ingla-Aynés, H. Yang, Z. Chi, B. Martin-Garcia, I. Robredo, M. G. Vergniory, F. de Juan, M. Reyes Calvo, L. E. Hueso, and F.Casanova,PhysicalReviewApplied19,014053(2022)

    2022

  71. [80]

    J. H. Garcia, A. W. Cummings, and S. Roche, Nano Let- ters17, 5078 (2017)

    2017

  72. [81]

    T. S. Ghiasi, A. A. Kaverzin, P. J. Blah, and B. J. van Wees, Nano Letters19, 5959 (2019)

    2019

  73. [82]

    Herling, C

    F. Herling, C. K. Safeer, J. Ingla-Aynés, N. Ontoso, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, APL Materials8, 071103 (2020)

    2020

  74. [83]

    Khokhriakov, A

    D. Khokhriakov, A. M. Hoque, B. Karpiak, and S. P. Dash, Nature Communications11, 3657 (2020)

    2020

  75. [84]

    A. M. Hoque, D. Khokhriakov, K. Zollner, B. Zhao, B. Karpiak, J. Fabian, and S. P. Dash, Communication Physics4, 124 (2021)

    2021

  76. [85]

    Ingla-Aynés, I

    J. Ingla-Aynés, I. Groen, F. Herling, N. Ontoso, C. K. Safeer, F. de Juan, L. E. Hueso, M. Gobbi, and F. Casanova, 2D Materials9, 045001 (2022)

    2022

  77. [86]

    Camosi, J

    L. Camosi, J. Světlík, M. V. Costache, W. S. Torres, I. F. Aguirre, V. Marinova, D. Dimitrov, M. Gospodinov, J. F. Sierra, and S. O. Valenzuela, 2D Materials9, 035014 (2022)

    2022

  78. [87]

    D. Hara, M. S. Bahramy, and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. B102, 184404 (2020)

    2020

  79. [88]

    Leiva-Montecinos, J

    S. Leiva-Montecinos, J. Henk, I. Mertig, and A. Johans- son, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043294 (2023)

    2023

  80. [89]

    T. P. Cysne, W. J. M. Kort-Kamp, and T. G. Rappoport, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023271 (2024)

    2024

  81. [90]

    A. Pezo, D. García Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Phys. Rev. B106, 104414 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.