Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Unifying spacetime approaches to quantum mechanics

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spacetime states give rise to path integrals, pseudo-density matrices, Page-Wootters, and other spacetime quantum formalisms via specific operations.

desk verdict The paper claims spacetime states unify path integrals, pseudo-density matrices, Page-Wootters and related formalisms via maps and channels, but the abstract leaves the actual constructions unshown. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12539 v1 pith:5JU6FGD4 submitted 2026-06-10 quant-ph gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP

N. L. Diaz , M. Cerezo , Paolo Braccia This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phgr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords spacetimestatesquantummechanicspathintegralspseudo-densitymatricesPage-Woottersmechanismsuperdensityoperatorstimelikeentanglementunification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a collection of spacetime-oriented approaches to quantum mechanics all derive from the same underlying spacetime states. These approaches include path integrals, quantum states over time, pseudo-density matrices, the Page and Wootters mechanism, superdensity operators, and timelike-entanglement proposals. Each one emerges through particular evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels applied to the spacetime states. A sympathetic reader would care because the unification supplies explicit representations for each formalism, makes their relations visible, and shows what spacetime information each one retains or discards.

What carries the argument

Spacetime states, which serve as the quantum-state analogues in the spacetime quantum mechanics framework, together with the operations of evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels that extract the listed formalisms from them.

What would settle it

A demonstration that recovering the Page and Wootters mechanism from a spacetime state requires additional assumptions or loses a feature that the original mechanism treats as essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Spacetime states, the objects that play the role of quantum states in spacetime quantum mechanics, are the single source from which path integrals, quantum states over time, pseudo-density matrices, the Page and Wootters mechanism, superdensity operators, and timelike-entanglement proposals all arise through particular evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels. The unification supplies explicit mathematical representations of these formalisms, reveals relations among them, and clarifies the spacetime information each one captures.

Load-bearing premise

That each listed formalism can be recovered from the spacetime-state object by the stated operations without extra structure or loss of the features that originally distinguished the proposals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same spacetime-state object supplies representations relevant to Leggett-Garg inequalities, out-of-time-order correlators, temporal tensor networks, fermionic systems, relativistic quantum field theories, quantum reference frames, and classical physics.
  • Relations between the formalisms become directly visible once each is expressed as an operation on the shared spacetime state.
  • The spacetime information retained or discarded by each formalism can be read off from the reduction step that produces it.
  • Additional insights into temporal correlations follow from choosing different evaluations or channels on the same spacetime state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Choosing different reduction maps from one spacetime state could generate hybrid formalisms that combine features of path integrals and pseudo-density matrices.
  • The unification suggests that discrepancies between two spacetime approaches might be traceable to the choice of which information is kept or discarded during the reduction step.
  • In settings with multiple observers, the spacetime-state picture might allow consistent treatment of temporal entanglement across different reference frames without separate constructions.
  • Testing whether a newly proposed spacetime formalism fits inside the same recovery scheme would immediately place it in relation to the existing ones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spacetime states serve as the unifying object in spacetime quantum mechanics, from which path integrals, quantum states over time, pseudo-density matrices, the Page and Wootters mechanism, superdensity operators, and timelike-entanglement proposals all arise via particular evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels. It further examines the framework's relevance to Leggett-Garg inequalities, OTOCs, temporal tensor networks, fermionic systems, relativistic QFTs, quantum reference frames, and classical physics.

Significance. If the mappings are faithful and preserve the distinguishing features of each formalism without additional ad-hoc structure, the work would supply explicit mathematical representations and relations among existing spacetime approaches, clarifying the spacetime information each captures and offering a common lens for applications in relativistic and temporal quantum settings.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the unification result is stated without derivations, explicit constructions, or error analysis, making it impossible to assess whether the claimed mappings from spacetime states are faithful or introduce hidden assumptions or loss of essential features.
  2. The central claim rests on the assumption that the listed formalisms recover from a single spacetime-state object via the stated operations; no concrete test or counter-example analysis is supplied to confirm independence from target formalisms.
minor comments (1)
  1. A summary table listing each formalism, the corresponding operation on spacetime states, and the information retained or discarded would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript. The abstract provides a concise overview of the unification, while the body supplies the explicit constructions, derivations, and mappings. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the unification result is stated without derivations, explicit constructions, or error analysis, making it impossible to assess whether the claimed mappings from spacetime states are faithful or introduce hidden assumptions or loss of essential features.

    Authors: The abstract is a high-level summary by design. The manuscript provides the requested explicit constructions and derivations in Sections 3–7, showing how each listed formalism (path integrals, pseudo-density matrices, Page-Wootters, etc.) is recovered from the spacetime state via concrete evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels. Preservation of distinguishing features and any information loss are analyzed in the relevant sections for each mapping. revision: no

  2. Referee: The central claim rests on the assumption that the listed formalisms recover from a single spacetime-state object via the stated operations; no concrete test or counter-example analysis is supplied to confirm independence from target formalisms.

    Authors: Section 2 defines the spacetime state independently of the target formalisms. Sections 4–7 then supply explicit, constructive derivations demonstrating recovery of each formalism’s standard results and features through the stated operations, without additional ad-hoc structure. These positive constructions across multiple distinct approaches constitute the primary evidence of the unification and independence; we do not claim exhaustive counter-example searches. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper defines spacetime states within the spacetime quantum mechanics framework and claims that path integrals, pseudo-density matrices, Page-Wootters, and related formalisms arise from them via evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or channels. No equations, self-citations, or derivations are exhibited that reduce the spacetime-state object to any of the target formalisms by construction, nor do any 'predictions' reduce to fitted inputs. The unification is presented as showing explicit representations and relations among independently motivated proposals, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Ledger is populated from abstract only; full paper may contain additional parameters or axioms not visible here.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Spacetime states exist as the fundamental objects from which the listed formalisms derive
    The entire unification rests on this premise being well-defined and sufficient.
invented entities (1)
  • spacetime states
    purpose: Serve as the single underlying object that generates all listed spacetime QM formalisms
    Central new or reified object introduced to achieve the unification; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied in abstract

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unifying spacetime approaches to quantum mechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5JU6FGD4

@misc{pith2026260612539,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unifying spacetime approaches to quantum mechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5JU6FGD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12539}
}
read the original abstract

Recent efforts to formulate quantum mechanics in a way that treats space and time on a more equal footing have led to a large variety of spacetime-oriented approaches. In this work we present a detailed study of spacetime states, the objects that play the role of quantum states in the recently introduced framework of spacetime quantum mechanics, and show that the main proposals in the literature are different manifestations of the same underlying object. Path integrals, quantum states over time, pseudo-density matrices, the Page and Wootters mechanism, superdensity operators, and timelike-entanglement proposals all arise from spacetime states through particular evaluations, reduced information, linear maps, or quantum channels. This unification provides explicit mathematical representations of these formalisms, reveals relations among them, and clarifies the spacetime information each one captures. We also study the broader relevance of the spacetime-state point of view for Leggett-Garg inequalities, OTOCs, temporal tensor networks, fermionic systems, relativistic QFTs, quantum reference frames, and classical physics, together with additional insights and perspectives revealed by the common unifying framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12539 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic depiction of how standard QM and its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Tensor network representation of the main objects of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In Appendix A we develop a simple analyti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (21 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Contour plot of the pseudo-purity Tr[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Contour plot of the imagitivity of the spacetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Graphical representation of Theorem 3. On the last [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Graphical representation on how the channel Φ de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Pictorial representations of the different maps in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Diagrammatic derivation of Eq. (99). On panel a) we depict [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Forward and backward correlator of Eq. (93) as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Illustrative example of Equation (123). We consider [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Diagrammatic proof of Lemma 2. We start with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Diagrammatic proof of Theorem 11. The main ideas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Different interpretations of timelike entanglement and generalizations. In Panel a) we depict the formulation presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Example of the folded time contour corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Scrambling diagnostics for the tilted-field Ising chain of 51 sites. Panels (a) and (b) show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Scrambling diagnostics for the tilted-field Ising chain. Panels (a) and (b) show the normalized distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Temporal entanglement and pseudo-entropies. On [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_19.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Spacetime state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Diagrammatic proof of the decomposition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Example of the purity Tr[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. We show a rearrangement of the Hilbert spaces on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Eigenvalues of the Gram matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. On panel a) we represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_24.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Selecting Complex Extremal Surfaces with the Kontsevich--Segal--Witten Criterion

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In AdS3, dS3, and AdS4 hyperbolic examples, the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten criterion uniquely selects a three-piece complex contour for timelike extremal surfaces, while timelike strips in AdS4 violate the criterion near...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The operatorsU⊗U⊗(U †)2 acting on the left of the time translations across slices on panel b) get replaced byU 10 ⊗U 21 ⊗U † 20 forU tt′ ≡U(ϵt ′, ϵt)

    Notably it is trivial to generalize to the time- dependent case: consider the example of the Figure 21. The operatorsU⊗U⊗(U †)2 acting on the left of the time translations across slices on panel b) get replaced byU 10 ⊗U 21 ⊗U † 20 forU tt′ ≡U(ϵt ′, ϵt). This happens in the 3-copies ofR. Then, on panel c) we just need to replace again each (U †)2 →U † 20,...

  2. [2]

    By writing the cor- responding expression forR † A and using Corollary 2 we obtain RA − R† A = 1 4 X i,j ⟨ψ|[Pi(t), Pj]|ψ⟩Pi ⊗P j .(B1) where we assumed a pure initial state|ψ⟩

    Imagitivity To describe our method let us first notice that since we are considering only two sitesR A = 1 4 P i,j Tr[RPi ⊗ 48 Pj]Pi ⊗P j whereP i are the Pauli matrices which form a complete orthogonal basis ofh. By writing the cor- responding expression forR † A and using Corollary 2 we obtain RA − R† A = 1 4 X i,j ⟨ψ|[Pi(t), Pj]|ψ⟩Pi ⊗P j .(B1) where w...

  3. [3]

    states” through MPS, evolved via Trotter steps, i.e., TEBD method applied to the vec- torized “external

    OTOCs Consider the operator ˜R4 restricted to the support of sitesr, r ′ and timest 1 = 0, t2 ≡t. From Eq. (144) we get eR4,A = 1 16 X i,j,k,l Cij;kl(r, r′;t)P i ⊗P j ⊗P k ⊗P l (B3) where we recall that the tensor, forr, r ′ sites andP i the Pauli matrices (i=x, y, z), is given by Cij;kl(r, r′;t) = tr[[P r,i(t), Pr′,j]†[Pr,k(t), Pr′,l]].(B4) This implies|...

  4. [4]

    Feynman PI Let us briefly explain how to obtain the close expres- sion forPof Eq. (53). We first notice than rather than employing operatorsq t, pt we can work with ladder op- eratorsa t, a† t satisfying [at, a† t′] =δ tt′ ,(C1) with other commutators vanishing. In fact, we can al- ways definea t =p ω 2 (qt +ip t/ω),a † t =p ω 2 (qt −ip t/ω) for arbitrary...

  5. [5]

    Let us focus first in the time translation operator de- fined in Eq

    Schwinger–Keldysh PI Here we provide an explicit derivation of the ma- trix elements ofe iSext needed to connect it to the Schwinger–Keldysh PI. Let us focus first in the time translation operator de- fined in Eq. (42). Notice that acting on the right it es- sentially translates one step in the future direction when 50 acting onp + and one steps on the pa...

  6. [6]

    Under the hypothesis of the theorem we consider a state of the form|ψ⟩= P k ψka† k|0⟩and a quadratic (particle preserving) HamiltonianH= P k,k′ Mkk′a† kak′

    Here ladder operators are evolved in the Heisenberg picturea k(t) =e iHt ake−iHt and|ψ⟩is a general state inh F . Under the hypothesis of the theorem we consider a state of the form|ψ⟩= P k ψka† k|0⟩and a quadratic (particle preserving) HamiltonianH= P k,k′ Mkk′a† kak′. Then, ladder operator evolve as follows, ak(t) = X k′ e−itM kk′ ak′ a† k(t) = X k′ eit...

  7. [7]

    Minkowski, Raum und Zeit, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10, 104 (1909)

    H. Minkowski, Raum und Zeit, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10, 104 (1909)

    1909

  8. [8]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature, Scientific American208, 45 (1963)

    1963

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    A. S. Eddington,Space, Time and Gravitation: An Out- line of the General Relativity Theory(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1920)

    1920

  2. [10]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The theory of gravitation in hamiltonian form, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences246, 333 (1958)

    1958

  3. [11]

    C. J. Isham, Canonical quantum gravity and the prob- lem of time, Integrable systems, quantum groups, and quantum field theories , 157 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity, An- nalen der Physik524, 757 (2012)

    E. Anderson, Problem of time in quantum gravity, An- nalen der Physik524, 757 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- tum origins of the classical, Reviews of modern physics 75, 715 (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    W. H. Zurek, Quantum darwinism, Nature physics5, 181 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    Touil, F

    A. Touil, F. Anza, S. Deffner, and J. P. Crutchfield, Branching states as the emergent structure of a quan- tum universe, Quantum8, 1494 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence, Physical review letters96, 181602 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Van Raamsdonk, Building up space–time with quan- tum entanglement, International Journal of Modern Physics D19, 2429 (2010)

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up space–time with quan- tum entanglement, International Journal of Modern Physics D19, 2429 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    C. Cao, S. M. Carroll, and S. Michalakis, Space from hilbert space: Recovering geometry from bulk entangle- ment, Physical Review D95, 024031 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Harper, A

    J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki,et al., Timelike entanglement entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 1 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    M. P. Heller, F. Ori, and A. Serantes, Temporal entan- glement from holographic entanglement entropy, Phys- ical Review X15, 041022 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Milekhin, Z

    A. Milekhin, Z. Adamska, and J. Preskill, Observable and computable entanglement in time, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12240 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Horsman, C

    D. Horsman, C. Heunen, M. F. Pusey, J. Barrett, and R. W. Spekkens, Can a quantum state over time resem- ble a quantum state at a single time?, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engi- neering Sciences473, 20170395 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    J. F. Fitzsimons, J. A. Jones, and V. Vedral, Quantum correlations which imply causation, Scientific reports5, 18281 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Fullwood and A

    J. Fullwood and A. J. Parzygnat, Operator represen- tation of spatiotemporal quantum correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17555 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Cotler, C.-M

    J. Cotler, C.-M. Jian, X.-L. Qi, and F. Wilczek, Su- perdensity operators for spacetime quantum mechanics, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 1 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, Evolution without evo- lution: Dynamics described by stationary observables, Physical Review D27, 2885 (1983)

    1983

  20. [28]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum time, Physical Review D92, 045033 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Boette, R

    A. Boette, R. Rossignoli, N. Gigena, and M. Cerezo, System-time entanglement in a discrete-time model, Physical Review A93, 062127 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Geomet- ric event-based quantum mechanics, New Journal of Physics25, 023027 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Guo, Spacetime density matrix: Formalism and properties, J

    W.-z. Guo, Spacetime density matrix: Formalism and properties, J. High Energ. Phys.2026(128)

    2026

  24. [32]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, Quan- tum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames, Nature communications10, 494 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Castro-Ruiz, F

    E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, and ˇC. Brukner, Dynam- ics of quantum causal structures, Physical Review X8, 011047 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    N. L. Diaz, J. M. Matera, and R. Rossignoli, Spacetime quantum and classical mechanics with dynamical folia- tion, Phys. Rev. D109, 105008 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    N. L. Diaz and R. Rossignoli, Spacetime quantum me- chanics for bosonic and fermionic systems, Physical Re- view Research8, 10.1103/zmky-mmwb (2026)

    2026 doi

  28. [36]

    N. L. Diaz, J. M. Matera, and R. Rossignoli, Space- time quantum actions, Physical Review D103, 065011 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    N. L. Diaz, From quantum time to manifestly covariant QFT: On the need for a quantum-action-based quanti- zation, Entropy28, 425 (2026)

    2026

  30. [38]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics, Reviews of modern physics20, 367 (1948)

    1948

  31. [39]

    N. L. Diaz, J. M. Matera, and R. Rossignoli, Path integrals from spacetime quantum actions, Annals of Physics , 170052 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    The corresponding Weyl algebra factorizes in time, and Stone-von Neumann givesH ≃ ⊗ thup to unitary equiv- alence

    For a finite number of time labels, [q t, pt′] =iδ tt′ de- fines a direct sum of independent canonical algebras. The corresponding Weyl algebra factorizes in time, and Stone-von Neumann givesH ≃ ⊗ thup to unitary equiv- alence

  33. [41]

    The case of fermions is however not equivalent to a tensor-product structure; for this reason we study it in the separate Section IV D

  34. [42]

    J. G. Kirkwood, Quantum statistics of almost classical assemblies, Physical Review44, 31 (1933)

    1933

  35. [43]

    P. A. M. Dirac, On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics17, 195 (1945)

    1945

  36. [44]

    Harper, T

    J. Harper, T. Kawamoto, R. Maeda, N. Nakamura, and T. Takayanagi, Non-hermitian density matrices from time-like entanglement and wormholes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13800 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Aharonov, D

    Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100, Physical review letters60, 1351 (1988)

    1988

  38. [46]

    A. J. Leggett and A. Garg, Quantum mechanics ver- sus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody 54 looks?, Physical Review Letters54, 857 (1985)

    1985

  39. [47]

    Singh and N

    S. Singh and N. Datta, Detecting positive quantum ca- pacities of quantum channels, npj Quantum Information 8, 50 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Val- iron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics88, 022318 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Ara´ ujo, C

    M. Ara´ ujo, C. Branciard, F. Costa, A. Feix, C. Giar- matzi, and ˇC. Brukner, Witnessing causal nonsepara- bility, New Journal of Physics17, 102001 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Cerezo, R

    M. Cerezo, R. Rossignoli, N. Canosa, and E. R´ ıos, Fac- torization and criticality in finitexxzsystems of arbi- trary spin, Physical Review Letters119, 220605 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Des Cloizeaux and J

    J. Des Cloizeaux and J. Pearson, Spin-wave spectrum of the antiferromagnetic linear chain, Physical Review 128, 2131 (1962)

    1962

  44. [52]

    Y.-T. Lee, K. Kumaran, B. Pokharel, A. Scheie, C. L. Sarkis, D. A. Tennant, T. Humble, A. Schleife, A. Kandala, and A. Banerjee, Benchmarking quantum simulation with neutron-scattering experiments, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15608 10.48550/arXiv.2603.15608 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 407 (1961)

    J. Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 407 (1961)

    1961

  46. [54]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Sov. Phys. JETP20(1965)

    1965

  47. [55]

    R. B. Griffiths, Consistent histories and the interpre- tation of quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics36, 219 (1984)

    1984

  48. [56]

    Gell-Mann and J

    M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology, inMurray Gell-Mann: Selected Papers(World Scientific, 2010) pp. 303–325

    2010

  49. [57]

    C. J. Isham, Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 35, 2157 (1994)

    1994

  50. [58]

    C. J. Isham, N. Linden, and S. Schreckenberg, The classification of decoherence functionals: An analog of gleason’s theorem, Journal of Mathematical Physics35, 6360 (1994)

    1994

  51. [59]

    Several results of this subsection are based on [33], where further mathematical details have been discussed

  52. [60]

    At finite temperature and out of equilibrium standard PI techniques are no longer feasi- ble [113]

    In many field theoretical applications at zero tempera- ture a PI suffices as one is interested in vacuum corre- lation functions, which can be obtained by the quotient of two Feynman PIs. At finite temperature and out of equilibrium standard PI techniques are no longer feasi-...

  53. [61]

    Brif and A

    C. Brif and A. Mann, Phase-space formulation of quan- tum mechanics and quantum-state reconstruction for physical systems with lie-group symmetries, Physical Review A59, 971 (1999)

    1999

  54. [62]

    S. H. Lie and J. Fullwood, Multipartite quantum states over time from two fundamental assumptions, Physical Review Letters135, 230204 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Marletto, V

    C. Marletto, V. Vedral, S. Virz` ı, E. Rebufello, A. Avella, F. Piacentini, M. Gramegna, I. P. Degiovanni, and M. Genovese, Non-monogamy of spatio-temporal cor- relations and the black hole information loss paradox, Entropy22, 228 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    M. Song, V. Narasimhachar, B. Regula, T. J. El- liott, and M. Gu, Causal classification of spatiotempo- ral quantum correlations, Physical Review Letters133, 110202 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Fullwood, Quantum dynamics as a pseudo-density matrix, Quantum9, 1719 (2025)

    J. Fullwood, Quantum dynamics as a pseudo-density matrix, Quantum9, 1719 (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    Zhang, O

    T. Zhang, O. Dahlsten, and V. Vedral, Different in- stances of time as different quantum modes: quantum states across space-time for continuous variables, New Journal of Physics22, 023029 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    We also mostly focus on uni- tary evolution as our discussion can be extended to quantum channels by simply extending the system

    We consider that between each measurements a fixed amount of timeϵlapsed. We also mostly focus on uni- tary evolution as our discussion can be extended to quantum channels by simply extending the system

  60. [68]

    X. Liu, Y. Qiu, O. Dahlsten, and V. Vedral, Quantum causal inference with extremely light touch, npj Quan- tum Information11, 1 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    To our knowledge, this connection was not made explicit in [56]

    In this sense, that Markovian QSOT extension may be naturally identified with the multipartite PDM. To our knowledge, this connection was not made explicit in [56]

  62. [70]

    Rudolph, Some properties of the computable cross- norm criterion for separability, Physical Review A67, 032312 (2003)

    O. Rudolph, Some properties of the computable cross- norm criterion for separability, Physical Review A67, 032312 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    Chen and L.-A

    K. Chen and L.-A. Wu, A matrix realignment method for recognizing entanglement, Quantum Information and Computation3, 193 (2003)

    2003

  64. [72]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Physical Review Letters77, 1413 (1996)

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Physical Review Letters77, 1413 (1996)

    1996

  65. [73]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Sepa- rability of n-particle mixed states: necessary and suffi- cient conditions in terms of linear maps, Physics Letters A283, 1 (2001)

    2001

  66. [74]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canon- ical theory, Physical Review160, 1113 (1967)

    1967

  67. [75]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Time and the interpre- tation of canonical quantum gravity, Physical Review D 40, 2598 (1989)

    1989

  68. [76]

    K. V. Kuchaˇ r, Time and interpretations of quantum gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D20, 3 (2011)

    2011

  69. [77]

    Boette and R

    A. Boette and R. Rossignoli, History states of systems and operators, Physical Review A98, 032108 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    I. L. Paiva, A. Te’eni, B. Y. Peled, E. Cohen, and Y. Aharonov, Non-inertial quantum clock frames lead to non-hermitian dynamics, Communications Physics5, 298 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    N. L. Diaz, P. Braccia, M. Larocca, J. M. Matera, R. Rossignoli, and M. Cerezo, Parallel-in-time quantum simulation via Page and Wootters quantum time, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033294 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    Cafasso, N

    D. Cafasso, N. Pranzini, J. Y. Malo, V. Giovannetti, and M. Chiofalo, Quantum time and the time-dilation induced interaction transfer mechanism, Physical Re- view D110, 106014 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Coppo, N

    A. Coppo, N. Pranzini, and P. Verrucchi, Quan- tum model for black holes and clocks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.07437 10.48550/arXiv.2601.07437 (2026)

    2026 doi

  74. [82]

    N. L. Diaz, J. M. Matera, and R. Rossignoli, History state formalism for scalar particles, Physical Review D 100, 125020 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    N. L. Diaz and R. Rossignoli, History state formalism for Dirac’s theory, Physical Review D99, 045008 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    Schwabl,Advanced quantum mechanics(Springer, 2008)

    F. Schwabl,Advanced quantum mechanics(Springer, 2008)

    2008

  77. [85]

    Nonetheless, since usu- ally a single time is considered, in practice this is never done

    One could attempt to introduce e.g., two-particle inter- action within the PW scheme. Nonetheless, since usu- ally a single time is considered, in practice this is never done. Instead, introducing a “clock” for each particle 55 give rise to a complete new set of challenges as ...

  78. [86]

    A. J. Coleman, Structure of fermion density matrices, Reviews of modern Physics35, 668 (1963)

    1963

  79. [87]

    D. A. Mazziotti, Structure of fermionic density matri- ces: Complete n-representability conditions, Physical Review Letters108, 263002 (2012)

    2012

  80. [88]

    We refer the reader to [28, 33] for subtleties in the con- tinuum time limit

  81. [89]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He, and T. Liu, Entanglement of gen- eral subregions in time-dependent states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19955 10.48550/arXiv.2512.19955 (2025)

    2025 doi

  82. [90]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar, Time-like entanglement entropy in ads/bcft, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10907 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    Narayan and H

    K. Narayan and H. K. Saini, Notes on time entanglement and pseudo-entropy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01307 (2023)

    2023

  84. [92]

    Nunez and D

    C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury, Timelike entanglement entropy: A top-down approach, Physical Review D112, 026030 (2025)

    2025

  85. [93]

    Jiang, H

    X. Jiang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Timelike entanglement entropy revisited, Phys. Rev. D113, 106021 (2026)

    2026

  86. [94]

    Emary, N

    C. Emary, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Leggett–garg in- equalities, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 016001 (2014)

    2014

  87. [95]

    Arbitrary evolutions can be considered by adding a sim- ple adjoint action onR; equivalently one can take arbi- traryNand partial traces

  88. [96]

    D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, Chaos and complexity by design, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 121 (2017)

    2017

  89. [97]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle, Accessing scrambling using ma- trix product operators, Nature Physics16, 199 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 1 (2016)

    2016

  91. [99]

    Lin and O

    C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Out-of-time-ordered cor- relators in a quantum Ising chain, Physical Review B 97, 144304 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    Banuls, M

    M.-C. Banuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states for dynamical simulation of infinite chains, Physical review letters102, 240603 (2009)

    2009

  93. [101]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Scaling of tem- poral entanglement in proximity to integrability, Phys- ical Review B104, 035137 (2021)

    2021

  94. [102]

    Ye and G

    E. Ye and G. K. Chan, Constructing tensor network in- fluence functionals for general quantum dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics155, 10.1063/5.0047260 (2021)

    2021 doi

  95. [103]

    G. Park, J. Gray, and G. K.-L. Chan, Simulating quan- tum dynamics in two-dimensional lattices with tensor network influence functional belief propagation, Physi- cal Review B112, 174310 (2025)

    2025

  96. [104]

    Lubasch, J

    M. Lubasch, J. I. Cirac, and M.-C. Banuls, Unifying pro- jected entangled pair state contractions, New Journal of Physics16, 033014 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    We use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, but one may also use the more general H¨ older inequality and Schatten norms

  98. [106]

    Gigena and R

    N. Gigena and R. Rossignoli, One-body information loss in fermion systems, Physical Review A94, 042315 (2016)

    2016

  99. [107]

    N. T. Vidal, M. L. Bera, A. Riera, M. Lewenstein, and M. N. Bera, Quantum operations in an information the- ory for fermions, Physical Review A104, 032411 (2021)

    2021

  100. [108]

    Nonetheless, these subtleties are the standard ones, as the algebra of Eq

    Let us recall that while for discrete spacetime the Stone- Von Neummann theorem guarantees that the Hilbert space is well-defined by the canonical algebra (up to uni- tary equivalence), the continuum limit carries the usual mathematical subtleties. Nonetheless, these subtletie...

  101. [109]

    Haag and D

    R. Haag and D. Kastler, An algebraic approach to quan- tum field theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics5, 848 (1964)

    1964

  102. [110]

    Aharonov and T

    Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr, Quantum frames of ref- erence, Physical Review D30, 368 (1984)

    1984

  103. [111]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, Rel- ativistic quantum reference frames: the operational meaning of spin, Physical review letters123, 090404 (2019)

    2019

  104. [112]

    Apadula, E

    L. Apadula, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum reference frames for lorentz symmetry, Quantum8, 1440 (2024)

    2024

  105. [113]

    We note that the literature also includes resource- theoretic approaches to QRFs; see, e.g., [114, 115]

  106. [114]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Generalized hamiltonian dynamics, Canadian journal of mathematics2, 129 (1950)

    1950

  107. [115]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. Stoudenmire, The itensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  109. [117]

    W. K. Wootters, A wigner-function formulation of finite-state quantum mechanics, Annals of Physics176, 1 (1987)

    1987

  110. [118]

    J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements, Journal of Mathematical Physics45, 2171 (2004)

    2004

  111. [119]

    Kamenev, Course 3 many-body theory of non- equilibrium systems, inLes Houches, Vol

    A. Kamenev, Course 3 many-body theory of non- equilibrium systems, inLes Houches, Vol. 81 (Elsevier,

  112. [120]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Ref- erence frames, superselection rules, and quantum infor- mation, Reviews of Modern Physics79, 555 (2007)

    2007

  113. [121]

    Marvian and R

    I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Modes of asymmetry: the application of harmonic analysis to symmetric quan- tum dynamics and quantum reference frames, Physical Review A90, 062110 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.