Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 202 references

Generative Modeling for Physiological Signals

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Generative models address data scarcity, noise, and privacy barriers in physiological signals by augmenting datasets and synthesizing recordings.

desk verdict This is a straightforward survey that organizes generative models for physiological signals and proposes a five-level evaluation hierarchy, with no new experiments or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23864 v1 pith:SXD4OGMR submitted 2026-06-22 eess.SP

Xinqi Bao , Ernest Kamavuako , Saikat Chatterjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords generativemodelingphysiologicalsignalsGANsVAEsdiffusionmodelsdataaugmentationsignalsynthesisevaluationframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that generative modeling can mitigate key constraints in physiological signal work including limited labeled data, class imbalance, noisy or incomplete recordings, heterogeneous settings, and privacy restrictions. It reviews applications of GANs, autoencoders and VAEs, diffusion models, autoregressive models, and hybrid architectures across cardiovascular, neural, muscular, peripheral, and specialized signals for tasks such as dataset augmentation, signal restoration, modality translation, and conditional waveform synthesis. The review further structures evaluation into a hierarchy covering signal similarity, dataset distribution, physiological validity, task utility, and generalization. A sympathetic reader would value this because it connects signal constraints directly to model choices and assessment methods for practical use in diagnosis, monitoring, and interaction.

What carries the argument

The hierarchical evaluation framework that organizes assessments from signal-level similarity through dataset distribution and physiological validity to task-oriented utility and generalization checks.

What would settle it

A later survey finding that most new generative work on physiological signals relies on model families or evaluation criteria outside the five categories and signal groupings covered here would show the guidance is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Recent studies have used generative models to augment scarce datasets, restore degraded recordings, translate between modalities, and synthesize conditional physiological waveforms. By organizing work on cardiovascular, neural, muscular, peripheral, and specialized signals according to model families and linking these to a hierarchical evaluation framework that spans signal-level similarity, dataset-level distribution, physiological validity, task-oriented utility, and assessments of generalization and robustness, the review supplies structured guidance for future use and evaluation of generative models in physiological-signal research.

Load-bearing premise

The selected recent studies on the listed model families and signal types adequately represent the major advances and evaluation practices in the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers gain a map for matching generative roles such as augmentation or restoration to specific signal types and constraints.
  • Evaluation can shift from isolated similarity metrics to include physiological validity and downstream task performance.
  • Privacy-preserving synthesis becomes more feasible when models are chosen and tested under the organized framework.
  • Hybrid model designs may be prioritized when handling heterogeneous acquisition settings across signal modalities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be applied to benchmark new wearable sensor data streams to test whether current validity checks scale to continuous monitoring.
  • Linking the evaluation levels to clinical outcome metrics might reveal where generative outputs improve diagnostic accuracy beyond statistical distribution matches.
  • Extending the hierarchy to include real-time latency and power constraints would address deployment barriers left implicit in the review.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey reviewing the application of generative models—including GANs, autoencoders/VAEs, diffusion models, autoregressive sequence models, and hybrid architectures—to physiological signals in cardiovascular, neural, muscular, peripheral, and specialized domains. It describes how these models address challenges such as limited labeled data, class imbalance, noise, heterogeneity, and privacy constraints through data augmentation, restoration, modality translation, and conditional synthesis. The central contribution is a proposed hierarchical evaluation framework spanning signal-level similarity, dataset-level distribution matching, physiological validity, task-oriented utility, and assessments of generalization and robustness.

Significance. The taxonomic organization of the literature and the introduction of a multi-level evaluation hierarchy constitute a useful contribution. By explicitly connecting signal-specific constraints, generative roles, model families, and evaluation practices, the survey can provide structured guidance for researchers working on physiological signal processing. The emphasis on physiological validity and task utility beyond basic similarity metrics is a strength that aligns with clinical needs.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the review 'organizes existing evaluation practices into a hierarchical framework,' but the manuscript should include a dedicated section or table that explicitly maps the cited studies onto each level of the hierarchy to demonstrate consistent application.
  2. Ensure the literature selection criteria and search methodology are described with sufficient detail (e.g., databases, keywords, inclusion dates) so that readers can assess the representativeness of the covered studies across the five signal categories.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The report contains no major comments, so we have no specific points to address point-by-point. We will handle any minor issues during revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: survey with no derivations

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey that organizes existing work on generative models for physiological signals and proposes an evaluation hierarchy. It contains no new equations, predictions, fitted parameters, theorems, or empirical results whose validity depends on internal consistency. All claims are descriptive summaries of cited external studies, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs or self-citations. The work is therefore self-contained as a review and exhibits no circularity of any enumerated kind.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a literature review the paper introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content rests on prior published studies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generative Modeling for Physiological Signals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXD4OGMR

@misc{pith2026260623864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generative Modeling for Physiological Signals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXD4OGMR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23864}
}
read the original abstract

Physiological signals support clinical diagnosis, health monitoring, rehabilitation, wearable sensing, and human--machine interaction. However, their applications are often constrained by limited labeled data, class imbalance, noisy or incomplete recordings, heterogeneous acquisition settings, and privacy restrictions. Generative modeling has therefore attracted increasing attention as a means of addressing some of these barriers. Recent studies have used generative models to augment scarce datasets, restore degraded recordings, translate between modalities, and synthesize conditional physiological waveforms. This review summarizes recent work on generative modeling for cardiovascular, neural, muscular, peripheral, and specialized physiological signals. Major model families are covered, including generative adversarial networks (GANs), autoencoders and variational autoencoders (AEs/VAEs), diffusion models, autoregressive sequence models, and hybrid architectures. In addition, it organizes existing evaluation practices into a hierarchical framework spanning signal-level similarity, dataset-level distribution, physiological validity, task-oriented utility, and assessments of generalization and robustness. By linking signal-specific constraints, generative roles, model families, and evaluation evidence, this review provides structured guidance for the future use and evaluation of generative models in physiological-signal research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual organization of generative modeling for physiological signals. Signals are grouped into cardiovascular, neural, muscular, peripheral, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Literature landscape of the content-eligible corpus. (A) Role–modality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simplified workflows of major generative model families used in physiological-signal research. A. GAN-based models generate synthetic signals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Layered evaluation targets for generative physiological signals. Signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. C. Reddy,Biomedical Signal Processing: Principles and Techniques. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 2005

    2005

  2. [2]

    Machine learning in biosignal analysis from wearable devices,

    I. Jeong, W. G. Chung, E. Kim, W. Park, H. Song, J. Lee, M. Oh, E. Kim, J. Paek, T. Lee, D. Kim, S. H. An, S. Kim, H. Cho, and J.-U. Park, “Machine learning in biosignal analysis from wearable devices,” Materials Horizons, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 6587–6621, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    A novel method for measuring the timing of heart sound components through digital phonocardiography,

    N. Giordano and M. Knaflitz, “A novel method for measuring the timing of heart sound components through digital phonocardiography,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 1868, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Analysis of ecg and pcg time delay around auscultation sites

    X. Bao, Y . Deng, N. Gall, and E. N. Kamavuako, “Analysis of ecg and pcg time delay around auscultation sites.” inBIOSIGNALS, 2020, pp. 206–213

    2020

  5. [5]

    Deep generative models for physiological signals: A systematic literature review,

    N. Neifar, A. Mdhaffar, A. Ben-Hamadou, and M. Jmaiel, “Deep generative models for physiological signals: A systematic literature review,”Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 165, p. 103127, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Sig- nal acquisition of brain–computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review,

    Y . Sun, X. Chen, B. Liu, L. Liang, Y . Wang, S. Gao, and X. Gao, “Sig- nal acquisition of brain–computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review,”Fundamental Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    A survey of few-shot learning for biomedical time series,

    C. Li, T. Denison, and T. Zhu, “A survey of few-shot learning for biomedical time series,”IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 192–210, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    The impact of inconsistent human annotations on ai driven clinical decision making,

    A. Sylolypavan, D. Sleeman, H. Wu, and M. Sim, “The impact of inconsistent human annotations on ai driven clinical decision making,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 26, 2023

    2023

Show all 202 references
  1. [9]

    The future of digital health with federated learning,

    N. Rieke, J. Hancox, W. Li, F. Milletar `ı, H. R. Roth, S. Albarqouni, S. Bakas, M. N. Galtier, B. A. Landman, K. Maier-Hein, S. Ourselin, M. Sheller, R. M. Summers, A. Trask, D. Xu, M. Baust, and M. J. Cardoso, “The future of digital health with federated learning,”npj Digita...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Mitigating data quality challenges in ambulatory wrist-worn wearable monitoring through analytical and practical approaches,

    J. V . D. Donckt, N. Vandenbussche, J. V . D. Donckt, S. Chen, M. Stojchevska, M. D. Brouwer, B. Steenwinckel, K. Paemeleire, F. Ongenae, and S. V . Hoecke, “Mitigating data quality challenges in ambulatory wrist-worn wearable monitoring through analytical and practical approa...

    2024

  3. [11]

    A review on multi- sensor data fusion for wearable health monitoring,

    A. John, A. P. James, B. Cardiff, and D. John, “A review on multi- sensor data fusion for wearable health monitoring,”Information Fusion, vol. 133, p. 104319, 2026

    2026

  4. [12]

    Time synchronization of multimodal physiological signals through alignment of common signal types and its technical considerations in digital health,

    R. Xiao, C. Ding, and X. Hu, “Time synchronization of multimodal physiological signals through alignment of common signal types and its technical considerations in digital health,”Journal of Imaging, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 120, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Generative adversarial nets,

    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, 2014, pp. 2672–2680. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes,

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014

    2014

  7. [15]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” inAdvances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 6840–6851. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/ 4c5bcfec8584af0d967f1ab10179ca4b-Abstract.html

    2020

  8. [16]

    Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio,

    A. van den Oord, S. Dieleman, H. Zen, K. Simonyan, O. Vinyals, A. Graves, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Senior, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio,” 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Generative ai models in time-varying biomedical data: Scoping review,

    R. Y . He, V . Sarwal, X. Qiu, Y . Zhuang, L. Zhang, Y . Liu, and J. N. Chiang, “Generative ai models in time-varying biomedical data: Scoping review,”Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 27, p. e59792, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    A review on generative ai models for synthetic medical text, time series, and longitudinal data,

    M. Loni, F. Poursalim, M. Asadi, and A. Gharehbaghi, “A review on generative ai models for synthetic medical text, time series, and longitudinal data,”npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, p. 281, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Generative adversarial networks in electrocardiogram synthesis: Recent developments and challenges,

    L. Berger, M. Haberbusch, and F. Moscato, “Generative adversarial networks in electrocardiogram synthesis: Recent developments and challenges,”Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 143, p. 102632, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Synthetic ecg signals generation: A scoping review,

    B. Zanchi, G. Monachino, L. Fiorillo, G. Conte, A. Auricchio, A. Tzo- vara, and F. D. Faraci, “Synthetic ecg signals generation: A scoping review,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 184, p. 109453, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Diffusion-based heart sound generation: Evaluation with physiolog- ical signal metrics, classifiers, and expert listening,

    X. Bao, J. Bi, X. Chen, E. N. Kamavuako, and S. Chatterjee, “Diffusion-based heart sound generation: Evaluation with physiolog- ical signal metrics, classifiers, and expert listening,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.02448, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Domain-adversarial pretrained encoder for ecg-based chagas disease screening,

    T. Dong, X. Bao, J. Bi, and S. Chatterjee, “Domain-adversarial pretrained encoder for ecg-based chagas disease screening,” in52nd International Computing in Cardiology, CinC 2025, Sao Paulo, Brazil, September 14-17, 2025. Computing in Cardiology, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation detection by combined recurrent neural network and feature extraction on ecg signals,

    X. Bao, F. Hu, Y . Xu, M. Trabelsi, and E. Kamavuako, “Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation detection by combined recurrent neural network and feature extraction on ecg signals,” inProceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technolog...

    2022

  16. [24]

    Cardiogan: Attentive generative adversarial network with dual discriminators for synthesis of ecg from ppg,

    P. Sarkar and A. Etemad, “Cardiogan: Attentive generative adversarial network with dual discriminators for synthesis of ecg from ppg,” in 15 Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 1, 2021, pp. 488–496

    2021

  17. [25]

    The impact of the mit-bih arrhythmia database,

    G. B. Moody and R. G. Mark, “The impact of the mit-bih arrhythmia database,”IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 45–50, 2001

    2001

  18. [26]

    PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset,

    P. Wagner, N. Strodthoff, R.-D. Bousseljot, D. Kreiseler, F. I. Lunze, W. Samek, and T. Schaeffter, “PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset,”Scientific Data, vol. 7, p. 154, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    A large-scale multi-label 12-lead electrocardiogram database with standardized diagnostic statements,

    H. Liu, D. Chen, D. Chen, X. Zhang, H. Li, L. Bian, M. Shu, and Y . Wang, “A large-scale multi-label 12-lead electrocardiogram database with standardized diagnostic statements,”Scientific Data, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 272, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physi- ological measurement,

    J. Allen, “Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physi- ological measurement,”Physiological Measurement, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. R1–R39, 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    Photoplethysmogram analysis and applications: An integrative review,

    J. Park, H. S. Seok, S.-S. Kim, and H. Shin, “Photoplethysmogram analysis and applications: An integrative review,”Frontiers in Physiol- ogy, vol. 12, p. 808451, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care,

    D. Castaneda, A. Esparza, M. Ghamari, C. Soltanpur, and H. Naz- eran, “A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care,”International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 195–202, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring,

    P. H. Charlton, P. A. Kyriacou, J. Mant, V . Marozas, P. Chowienczyk, and J. Alastruey, “Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 355–381, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Photoplethysmography in wearable de- vices: A comprehensive review of technological advances, current challenges, and future directions,

    K.-B. Kim and H. J. Baek, “Photoplethysmography in wearable de- vices: A comprehensive review of technological advances, current challenges, and future directions,”Electronics, vol. 12, no. 13, p. 2923, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Photoplethysmographic sensors: Potential and limitations,

    F. Scardulla, G. Cosoli, S. Spinsante, A. Poli, G. Iadarola, and R. Pernice, “Photoplethysmographic sensors: Potential and limitations,” Measurement, vol. 212, p. 112706, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Reliable wrist PPG monitoring by mitigating poor skin sensor con- tact,

    H. M. Pham, M. Y . Ho, Y . Zhang, D. Spathis, A. Saeed, and D. Ma, “Reliable wrist PPG monitoring by mitigating poor skin sensor con- tact,”Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 45046, 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing,

    P. H. Charlton, K. Pilt, and P. A. Kyriacou, “Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing,”Physio- logical Measurement, vol. 43, no. 5, p. 050301, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Fhrgan: Generative adversarial networks for synthetic fetal heart rate signal generation in low-resource settings,

    Y . Zhang, Z. Zhao, Y . Deng, and X. Zhang, “Fhrgan: Generative adversarial networks for synthetic fetal heart rate signal generation in low-resource settings,”Information Sciences, vol. 594, pp. 136–150, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Figo con- sensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography,

    D. Ayres-de Campos, C. Y . Spong, and E. Chandraharan, “Figo con- sensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    Parametric modelling of cardiac system multiple mea- surement signals: An open-source computer framework for perfor- mance evaluation of ecg, pcg and abp event detectors,

    M. R. Homaeinezhad, P. Sabetian, A. Feizollahi, A. Ghaffari, and R. Rahmani, “Parametric modelling of cardiac system multiple mea- surement signals: An open-source computer framework for perfor- mance evaluation of ecg, pcg and abp event detectors,”Journal of Medical Engineeri...

    2012

  31. [39]

    The effect of signal duration on the classification of heart sounds: A deep learning approach,

    X. Bao, Y . Xu, and E. N. Kamavuako, “The effect of signal duration on the classification of heart sounds: A deep learning approach,”sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 2261, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Hierarchical multi- scale convolutional network for murmurs detection on pcg signals,

    Y . Xu, X. Bao, H.-K. Lam, and E. N. Kamavuako, “Hierarchical multi- scale convolutional network for murmurs detection on pcg signals,” in 2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), vol. 498. IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–4

    2022

  33. [41]

    Time-frequency distributions of heart sound signals: A comparative study using convolutional neural networks,

    X. Bao, Y . Xu, H.-K. Lam, M. Trabelsi, I. Chihi, L. Sidhom, and E. N. Kamavuako, “Time-frequency distributions of heart sound signals: A comparative study using convolutional neural networks,”Biomedical Engineering Advances, vol. 5, p. 100093, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Signal statistics of heart sound recordings: A comparative study between smartphones and electronic stethoscopes,

    X. Bao, P. Lamata, and E. Kamavuako, “Signal statistics of heart sound recordings: A comparative study between smartphones and electronic stethoscopes,” in2024 IEEE 22nd Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1089–1094

    2024

  35. [43]

    Classifica- tion of heart sound recordings: The physionet/computing in cardiology challenge 2016,

    C. Liu, D. Springer, Q. Li, B. Moody, R. A. Juan, F. J. Chorro, F. Castells, J. M. Roig, I. Silva, A. E. W. Johnson, Z. Syed, S. E. Schmidt, C. D. Papadaniil, L. Hadjileontiadis, H. Naseri, A. Mouka- dem, A. Dieterlen, C. Brandt, H. Tang, M. Samieinasab, M. R. Samieinasab, R. ...

    2016

  36. [44]

    The CirCor DigiScope phonocardiogram dataset,

    J. Oliveira, F. Renna, T. Mantadelis, and M. T. Coimbra, “The CirCor DigiScope phonocardiogram dataset,”PhysioNet, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Virtual electroencephalogram acquisition: A review on electroencephalogram generative methods,

    Z. You, Y . Guo, X. Zhang, and Y . Zhao, “Virtual electroencephalogram acquisition: A review on electroencephalogram generative methods,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 10, p. 3178, 2025

    2025

  38. [46]

    Eeg and meg: Relevance to neuroscience,

    F. L. da Silva, “Eeg and meg: Relevance to neuroscience,”Neuron, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1112–1128, 2013

    2013

  39. [47]

    Recent progress in wearable brain–computer interface (BCI) devices based on electroencephalogram (EEG) for medical applications: A review,

    J. Zhang, J. Li, Z. Huang, D. Huang, H. Yu, and Z. Li, “Recent progress in wearable brain–computer interface (BCI) devices based on electroencephalogram (EEG) for medical applications: A review,” Health Data Science, vol. 3, p. 0096, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? a scalp current density view,

    B. Burle, L. Spieser, C. Roger, L. Casini, T. Hasbroucq, and F. Vidal, “Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? a scalp current density view,”International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 210–220, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Motion artifact removal techniques for wearable eeg and ppg sensor systems,

    D. Seok, S. Lee, M. Kim, J. Cho, and C. Kim, “Motion artifact removal techniques for wearable eeg and ppg sensor systems,”Frontiers in Electronics, vol. 2, p. 685513, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Promises and limitations of human intracra- nial electroencephalography,

    J. Parvizi and S. Kastner, “Promises and limitations of human intracra- nial electroencephalography,”Nature Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 474–483, 2018

    2018

  43. [51]

    E2sgan: Eeg-to-seeg translation with generative adversarial networks,

    M. Hu, J. Chen, S. Jiang, W. Ji, S. Mei, L. Chen, and X. Wang, “E2sgan: Eeg-to-seeg translation with generative adversarial networks,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 971829, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging,

    S. Baillet, “Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging,”Nature Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 327–339, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Best practices for fNIRS publications,

    M. A. Y ¨ucel, A. v. L ¨uhmann, F. Scholkmann, J. Gervain, I. Dan, H. Ayaz, D. A. Boas, R. J. Cooper, J. Culver, C. E. Elwell, A. T. Eggebrecht, M. A. Franceschini, C. Grova, F. Homae, F. Lesage, H. Obrig, I. Tachtsidis, S. Tak, Y . Tong, and V . Toronov, “Best practices for f...

    2021

  46. [54]

    Optimizing spatial specificity and signal quality in fNIRS,

    F. Klein, F. Klein, E. J. H. Jones, and S. Lloyd-Fox, “Optimizing spatial specificity and signal quality in fNIRS,”NeuroImage, vol. 290, p. 120549, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Virtual eeg-electrodes: Convolutional neural networks as a method for upsam- pling or restoring channels,

    M. Svantesson, H. Olausson, A. Eklund, and M. Thordstein, “Virtual eeg-electrodes: Convolutional neural networks as a method for upsam- pling or restoring channels,”Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 355, p. 109126, 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Evaluating the impact of input noise and erp-based penalties on the physiological plausibility of eeg generation using wgan-gp,

    X. Li, M. K. van Vugt, and N. M. Maurits, “Evaluating the impact of input noise and erp-based penalties on the physiological plausibility of eeg generation using wgan-gp,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 199, p. 111296, 2025

    2025

  49. [57]

    Surface emg in clinical assessment and neurorehabilitation: Barriers limiting its use,

    I. Campanini, C. Disselhorst-Klug, W. Z. Rymer, and R. Merletti, “Surface emg in clinical assessment and neurorehabilitation: Barriers limiting its use,”Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 11, p. 934, 2020

    2020

  50. [58]

    On the usability of intramuscular emg for prosthetic control: A fitts’ law approach,

    E. N. Kamavuako, E. J. Scheme, and K. B. Englehart, “On the usability of intramuscular emg for prosthetic control: A fitts’ law approach,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 770– 777, 2014

    2014

  51. [59]

    Surface electromyog- raphy as a natural human–machine interface: A review,

    M. Zheng, M. S. Crouch, and M. S. Eggleston, “Surface electromyog- raphy as a natural human–machine interface: A review,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 9198–9214, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    Chatemg: Synthetic data generation to control a robotic hand orthosis for stroke,

    J. Xu, R. Wang, S. Shang, A. Chen, L. Winterbottom, T.-L. Hsu, W. Chen, K. Ahmed, P. L. L. Rotta, X. Zhu, D. M. Nilsen, J. Stein, and M. Ciocarlie, “Chatemg: Synthetic data generation to control a robotic hand orthosis for stroke,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 10,...

    2025

  53. [61]

    Emg-based hand gesture classifier robust to daily variation: Recursive domain adversarial neural network with data synthesis,

    D. Lee, D. You, G. Cho, H. Lee, E. Shin, T. Choi, S. Kim, S. Lee, and W. Nam, “Emg-based hand gesture classifier robust to daily variation: Recursive domain adversarial neural network with data synthesis,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 88, p. 105600, 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques,

    R. H. Chowdhury, M. B. I. Reaz, M. A. B. M. Ali, A. A. A. Bakar, K. Chellappan, and T. G. Chang, “Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques,”Sensors, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 12 431–12 466, 2013

    2013

  55. [63]

    A novel semg data augmentation based on wgan-gp,

    F. Coelho, M. F. Pinto, A. G. Melo, G. S. Ramos, and A. L. M. Marcato, “A novel semg data augmentation based on wgan-gp,”Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1008–1017, 2023

    2023

  56. [64]

    Deep convolutional genera- tive adversarial network-based emg data enhancement for hand motion classification,

    Z. Chen, Y . Qian, Y . Wang, and Y . Fang, “Deep convolutional genera- tive adversarial network-based emg data enhancement for hand motion classification,”Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 10, p. 909653, 2022

    2022

  57. [65]

    Conditional GAN based augmen- tation for predictive modeling of respiratory signals,

    S. Jayalakshmy and G. F. Sudha, “Conditional GAN based augmen- tation for predictive modeling of respiratory signals,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 138, p. 104930, 2021

    2021

  58. [66]

    An end-to-end and accurate PPG-based respiratory rate estimation approach using cycle generative adversarial networks,

    S. A. H. Aqajari, R. Cao, A. H. A. Zargari, and A. M. Rahmani, “An end-to-end and accurate PPG-based respiratory rate estimation approach using cycle generative adversarial networks,” inProceedings 16 of the 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medic...

    2021

  59. [67]

    Data augmen- tation using variational autoencoders for improvement of respiratory disease classification,

    J. Saldanha, S. Chakraborty, S. Patil, and K. Kotecha, “Data augmen- tation using variational autoencoders for improvement of respiratory disease classification,”PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 8, p. e0266467, 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    A conditional GAN for generating time series data for stress detection in wearable physiological sensor data,

    M. Ehrhart, B. Resch, C. Havas, and D. Niederseer, “A conditional GAN for generating time series data for stress detection in wearable physiological sensor data,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 16, p. 5969, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Generating synthetic health sensor data for privacy-preserving wearable stress detection,

    L. Lange, N. Wenzlitschke, and E. Rahm, “Generating synthetic health sensor data for privacy-preserving wearable stress detection,”Sensors, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 3052, 2024

    2024

  62. [70]

    Electroocu- lography signal generation with conditional diffusion models for eye movement classification,

    H.-T. Choi, E. A. B. Eh Mi, B.-K. Kim, and W.-D. Chang, “Electroocu- lography signal generation with conditional diffusion models for eye movement classification,”Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 110, p. 108211, 2025

    2025

  63. [71]

    Respiratory rate: The neglected vital sign,

    M. A. Cretikos, R. Bellomo, K. Hillman, J. Chen, S. Finfer, and A. Flabouris, “Respiratory rate: The neglected vital sign,”Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 188, no. 11, pp. 657–659, 2008

    2008

  64. [72]

    Advances in respiratory monitoring: A comprehensive review of wearable and remote tech- nologies,

    D. Vitazkova, E. Foltan, H. Kosnacova, M. Micjan, M. Donoval, A. Kuzma, M. Kopani, and E. Vavrinsky, “Advances in respiratory monitoring: A comprehensive review of wearable and remote tech- nologies,”Biosensors, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 90, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    Comparison between embroidered and gel electrodes on ecg-derived respiration rate,

    X. Bao, M. Howard, I. K. Niazi, and E. N. Kamavuako, “Comparison between embroidered and gel electrodes on ecg-derived respiration rate,” in2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2020, pp. 2622–2625

    2020

  66. [74]

    Estimation of the respiratory rate from localised ecg at different auscultation sites,

    X. Bao, A. K. Abdala, and E. N. Kamavuako, “Estimation of the respiratory rate from localised ecg at different auscultation sites,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 78, 2021

    2021

  67. [75]

    Detect- ing moments of stress from measurements of wearable physiological sensors,

    K. Kyriakou, B. Resch, G. Sagl, A. Petutschnig, C. Werner, D. Nieder- seer, M. Liedlgruber, F. H. Wilhelm, T. Osborne, and J. Pykett, “Detect- ing moments of stress from measurements of wearable physiological sensors,”Sensors, vol. 19, no. 17, p. 3805, 2019

    2019

  68. [76]

    Wrist-based electrodermal activity monitoring for stress detection: A scoping review,

    A. Almadhor, T. Ward, M. Gochoo, J. M. Di Martino, S. Hernandez, and A. G ´omez, “Wrist-based electrodermal activity monitoring for stress detection: A scoping review,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, p. 3984, 2023

    2023

  69. [77]

    The role of continuous glucose monitoring in physical activity and nutrition management: Perspectives on present and possible uses,

    Y . I. Kim, Y . Choi, and J. Park, “The role of continuous glucose monitoring in physical activity and nutrition management: Perspectives on present and possible uses,”Physical Activity and Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 44–51, 2023

    2023

  70. [78]

    Uncovering personalized glucose responses and circadian rhythms from multiple wearable biosensors with bayesian dynamical modeling,

    N. E. Phillips, T.-H. Collet, and F. Naef, “Uncovering personalized glucose responses and circadian rhythms from multiple wearable biosensors with bayesian dynamical modeling,”Cell Reports Methods, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 100545, 2023

    2023

  71. [79]

    A conditional generative adversarial network for synthesis of continuous glucose monitoring signals,

    S. L. Cichosz and A. A. P. Xylander, “A conditional generative adversarial network for synthesis of continuous glucose monitoring signals,”Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1220–1223, 2022

    2022

  72. [80]

    GluGAN: Generating per- sonalized glucose time series using generative adversarial networks,

    T. Zhu, K. Li, P. Herrero, and P. Georgiou, “GluGAN: Generating per- sonalized glucose time series using generative adversarial networks,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 5122–5133, 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    Conditional synthesis of blood glucose profiles for T1D patients using deep generative models,

    O. Mujahid, I. Contreras, A. Beneyto, I. Conget, M. Gim ´enez, and J. Veh ´ı, “Conditional synthesis of blood glucose profiles for T1D patients using deep generative models,”Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 20, p. 3741, 2022

    2022

  74. [82]

    Gen- erative adversarial network-based data augmentation for improving hypoglycemia prediction: A proof-of-concept study,

    W. Seo, N. Kim, S.-W. Park, S.-M. Jin, and S.-M. Park, “Gen- erative adversarial network-based data augmentation for improving hypoglycemia prediction: A proof-of-concept study,”Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 92, p. 106077, 2024

    2024

  75. [83]

    DeepGANnel: Synthesis of fully annotated single molecule patch-clamp data using generative adversarial networks,

    S. T. M. Ball, N. Celik, E. Sayari, L. Abdul Kadir, F. O’Brien, and R. Barrett-Jolley, “DeepGANnel: Synthesis of fully annotated single molecule patch-clamp data using generative adversarial networks,” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 5, p. e0267452, 2022

    2022

  76. [84]

    Denoising and decoding spontaneous vagus nerve recordings with machine learning,

    M. Ribeiro, R. G. L. Koh, T. Donnelly, C. Lutteroth, M. J. Proulx, P. R. F. Rocha, and B. Metcalfe, “Denoising and decoding spontaneous vagus nerve recordings with machine learning,” inProceedings of the 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine ...

    2023

  77. [85]

    Data imbalance in cardiac health diagnostics using cecg-gan,

    Y . Yang, T. Lan, Y . Wang, F. Li, L. Liu, X. Huang, F. Gao, S. Jiang, Z. Zhang, and X. Chen, “Data imbalance in cardiac health diagnostics using cecg-gan,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 14767, 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Principal component conditional generative adversarial net- works for imbalanced ecg classification enhancement,

    C. Tang, “Principal component conditional generative adversarial net- works for imbalanced ecg classification enhancement,”PLOS ONE, vol. 20, no. 8, p. e0330707, 2025

    2025

  79. [87]

    Synthetic ecg signal generation using generative neural networks,

    E. Adib, F. Afghah, and J. J. Prevost, “Synthetic ecg signal generation using generative neural networks,”PLOS ONE, vol. 20, no. 3, p. e0271270, 2025

    2025

  80. [88]

    A few-shot learning-based eeg and stage transition sequence generator for improving sleep staging performance,

    Y . You, X. Guo, X. Zhong, and Z. Yang, “A few-shot learning-based eeg and stage transition sequence generator for improving sleep staging performance,”Biomedicines, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 3006, 2022

    2022

  81. [89]

    Multichannel high noise level ecg denoising based on adversarial deep learning approach,

    F. L. Mvuh, C. O. V . E. Ko’a, and B. Bodo, “Multichannel high noise level ecg denoising based on adversarial deep learning approach,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 801, 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    Eeg channel reconstruction using convolutional neural networks in limited bcis: A proposed method for neuromarketing applications,

    M. Q. P ´erez, S. L. Bernal, E. H. Prat, L. M. D. Campo, L. F. Maim ´o, and A. H. Celdr ´an, “Eeg channel reconstruction using convolutional neural networks in limited bcis: A proposed method for neuromarketing applications,”Applied Soft Computing, vol. 181, p. 113455, 2025

    2025

  83. [91]

    Filling missing values on wearable-sensory time series data,

    S. Lin, X. Wu, G. Martinez, and N. V . Chawla, “Filling missing values on wearable-sensory time series data,” inProceedings of the 2020 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 2020, pp. 46–54

    2020

  84. [92]

    Reducing noise, artifacts and interference in single-channel emg signals: A review,

    M. Boyer, L. Bouyer, J.-S. Roy, and A. Campeau-Lecours, “Reducing noise, artifacts and interference in single-channel emg signals: A review,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 2927, 2023

    2023

  85. [93]

    Region-disentangled diffusion model for high-fidelity ppg-to-ecg translation,

    D. Shome, P. Sarkar, and A. Etemad, “Region-disentangled diffusion model for high-fidelity ppg-to-ecg translation,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  86. [94]

    Crossl: Cross-modal self-supervised learning for time- series through latent masking,

    S. Deldari, D. Spathis, M. Malekzadeh, F. Kawsar, F. D. Salim, and A. Mathur, “Crossl: Cross-modal self-supervised learning for time- series through latent masking,” inProceedings of the Seventeenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 2024, pp. 143–152

    2024

  87. [95]

    Synthetic ecg signals generation: A scoping review,

    B. Zanchi, G. Monachino, L. Fiorillo, G. Conte, A. Auricchio, A. Tzo- vara, and F. D. Faraci, “Synthetic ecg signals generation: A scoping review,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, p. 109453, 2025

    2025

  88. [96]

    Ecgan: Self-supervised generative adver- sarial network for electrocardiography,

    L. Simone and D. Bacciu, “Ecgan: Self-supervised generative adver- sarial network for electrocardiography,” inArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13897, 2023, pp. 276–280

    2023

  89. [97]

    Transdiffecg: Semantically controllable ecg synthesis via transformer-based diffusion modeling,

    Y . Lin, J. Ma, S. Dong, C. Sun, W. Cong, K. Wang, G. Luo, and W. Wang, “Transdiffecg: Semantically controllable ecg synthesis via transformer-based diffusion modeling,”Journal of Biomedical Infor- matics, vol. 172, p. 104948, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    Plethaugment: Gan-based ppg augmentation for medical diagnosis in low-resource settings,

    D. Kiyasseh, G. A. Tadesse, L. N. T. Nhan, L. V . Tan, L. Thwaites, T. Zhu, and D. Clifton, “Plethaugment: Gan-based ppg augmentation for medical diagnosis in low-resource settings,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2020

    2020

  91. [99]

    Biosignal data augmentation based on generative adversarial networks,

    S. Harada, H. Hayashi, and S. Uchida, “Biosignal data augmentation based on generative adversarial networks,” in2018 40th Annual Inter- national Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2018, pp. 368–371

    2018

  92. [100]

    Sgecg: A stargan- based framework for intelligent ecg generation and augmentation,

    L. Yao, S. Sun, R. Sun, S. Liang, and L. Zhang, “Sgecg: A stargan- based framework for intelligent ecg generation and augmentation,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Electronic Information Engineer- ing and Computer Science (EIECS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 694–698

    2024

  93. [101]

    Ctggan: Reliable fetal heart rate signal generation using gans,

    Z. Yu, Y . Hu, Y . Lu, L. Li, H. Ge, and X. Fu, “Ctggan: Reliable fetal heart rate signal generation using gans,”Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Ecgan-assisted rest-net based on fuzziness for osa detection,

    Z. Wang, X. Pan, Z. Mei, Z. Xu, Y . Lv, Y . Zhang, and C. Guan, “Ecgan-assisted rest-net based on fuzziness for osa detection,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 2518– 2527, 2024

    2024

  95. [103]

    Generative adversarial network with transformer generator for boosting ecg classification,

    Y . Xia, Y . Xu, P. Chen, J. Zhang, and Y . Zhang, “Generative adversarial network with transformer generator for boosting ecg classification,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 80, p. 104276, 2023

    2023

  96. [104]

    A new method for gan-based data augmentation for classes with distinct clusters,

    M. Kuntalp and O. D ¨uzyel, “A new method for gan-based data augmentation for classes with distinct clusters,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 235, p. 121199, 2024

    2024

  97. [105]

    Quantum conditional generative adver- sarial network based on patch method for abnormal electrocardiogram generation,

    Z. Qu, W. Shi, and P. Tiwari, “Quantum conditional generative adver- sarial network based on patch method for abnormal electrocardiogram generation,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 166, p. 107549, 2023

    2023

  98. [106]

    Eeg feature extraction and data augmentation in emotion recognition,

    M. P. Kalashami, M. M. Pedram, and H. Sadr, “Eeg feature extraction and data augmentation in emotion recognition,”Computational Intel- ligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, pp. 1–16, 2022

    2022

  99. [107]

    Erp-wgan: A data augmentation method for eeg single-trial detection,

    R. Zhang, Y . Zeng, L. Tong, J. Shu, R. Lu, K. Yang, Z. Li, and B. Yan, “Erp-wgan: A data augmentation method for eeg single-trial detection,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 376, p. 109621, 2022

    2022

  100. [108]

    Eeg data augmentation: towards class imbalance problem in sleep staging tasks,

    J. Fan, C. Sun, C. Chen, X. Jiang, X. Liu, X. Zhao, L. Meng, C. Dai, and W. Chen, “Eeg data augmentation: towards class imbalance problem in sleep staging tasks,”Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 056017, 2020. 17

    2020

  101. [109]

    Ganser: A self-supervised data augmentation framework for eeg-based emotion recognition,

    Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, and S. h. Zhong, “Ganser: A self-supervised data augmentation framework for eeg-based emotion recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023

    2023

  102. [110]

    Parkinson’s disease emg data augmentation and simulation with dcgans and style transfer,

    R. Anicet Zanini and E. Luna Colombini, “Parkinson’s disease emg data augmentation and simulation with dcgans and style transfer,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 9, p. 2605, 2020

    2020

  103. [111]

    semg signal generation for data augmentation using time series transformer based conditional gan,

    C. Nasrallah, S. Boudaoud, J. Laforet, E. Chazard, J.-B. Beuscart, and D. Istrate, “semg signal generation for data augmentation using time series transformer based conditional gan,”International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering, ICABME, 2023

    2023

  104. [112]

    Ac- wgan-gp: Augmenting ecg and gsr signals using conditional generative models for arousal classification,

    A. Furdui, T. Zhang, M. Worring, P. Cesar, and A. E. Ali, “Ac- wgan-gp: Augmenting ecg and gsr signals using conditional generative models for arousal classification,” inAdjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing an...

    2021

  105. [113]

    Cvae-based generator for variable length synthetic ecg,

    S. Dakshit and B. Prabhakaran, “Cvae-based generator for variable length synthetic ecg,” in2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). IEEE, 2023, pp. 235–244

    2023

  106. [114]

    Epileptic seizure detection from eeg signals using autoencoder-based graph convolutional neural network,

    F. A. Jibon and F. H. Siddiqui, “Epileptic seizure detection from eeg signals using autoencoder-based graph convolutional neural network,” in2025 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Com- munication Engineering (ECCE). IEEE, 2025

    2025

  107. [115]

    A semi-supervised autoencoder framework for joint generation and classification of breath- ing,

    O. Pastor-Serrano, D. Lathouwers, and Z. Perk ´o, “A semi-supervised autoencoder framework for joint generation and classification of breath- ing,”Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 209, p. 106312, 2021

    2021

  108. [116]

    Few-shot ppg signal generation via guided diffusion models,

    J. Kang, Y . Lim, K. Kim, H. Lee, K. Y . Kim, M. Kim, J. Jung, and K. Song, “Few-shot ppg signal generation via guided diffusion models,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 32 792–32 800, 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Generative modeling and augmentation of eeg signals using improved diffusion probabilistic models,

    S. Torma and L. Szegletes, “Generative modeling and augmentation of eeg signals using improved diffusion probabilistic models,”Journal of Neural Engineering, 2025

    2025

  110. [118]

    Eeg data augmentation for emotion recognition using diffusion model,

    Y . D. Zhao, Y . K. Liu, W. L. Zheng, and B. L. Lu, “Eeg data augmentation for emotion recognition using diffusion model,”2024 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2024

    2024

  111. [119]

    Neurophysiological data augmentation for eeg-fnirs multimodal fea- tures based on a denoising diffusion probabilistic model,

    L. Chen, Z. Yin, X. Gu, X. Zhang, X. Cao, C. Zhang, and X. Li, “Neurophysiological data augmentation for eeg-fnirs multimodal fea- tures based on a denoising diffusion probabilistic model,”Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 261, p. 108594, 2025

    2025

  112. [120]

    Adaptive dual augmented extended kalman filtering of ecg signals,

    H. Hesar and A. Danandeh Hesar, “Adaptive dual augmented extended kalman filtering of ecg signals,”Measurement: Journal of the Interna- tional Measurement Confederation, 2025

    2025

  113. [121]

    Arx-based eeg data balancing for error potential bci,

    A. Farabbi, V . Aloia, and L. Mainardi, “Arx-based eeg data balancing for error potential bci,”Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 036023, 2022

    2022

  114. [122]

    Data augmentation for motor imagery signal classification based on a hybrid neural network,

    K. Zhang, G. Xu, Z. Han, K. Ma, X. Zheng, L. Chen, N. Duan, and S. Zhang, “Data augmentation for motor imagery signal classification based on a hybrid neural network,”Sensors, 2020

    2020

  115. [123]

    A gan based heart sound de- noising model,

    M. Liang, J. Hu, X. Zhou, and S. Xiao, “A gan based heart sound de- noising model,” in2022 12th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), 2022, pp. 666–670

    2022

  116. [124]

    A method for ecg denoising based on generative adversarial networks,

    E. Liu, Z. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, H. Zhou, and X. Wang, “A method for ecg denoising based on generative adversarial networks,”International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2025

    2025

  117. [125]

    Augan-net: A denoising model revolutionizing automated remote heart sound signal analysis,

    P. K. Dwibedy, P. K. Jain, and S. Bakshi, “Augan-net: A denoising model revolutionizing automated remote heart sound signal analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025

    2025

  118. [126]

    Con- ditional gan-based ecg signal denoising with skin-electrode impedance modeling,

    B. Kim, D. Kim, W. Choi, T.-H. Yang, G. Jo, and Y .-M. Kim, “Con- ditional gan-based ecg signal denoising with skin-electrode impedance modeling,”IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  119. [127]

    Research on heart sound signal denoising algorithm based on improved generative adversarial network,

    H. Ye, Y . Sun, Y . Zhao, and K. Sun, “Research on heart sound signal denoising algorithm based on improved generative adversarial network,”2025 18th IEEE United Conference on Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Technologies (UCMMT), 2025

    2025

  120. [128]

    Blind ECG restoration by operational Cycle-GANs,

    S. Kiranyaz, O. C. Devecioglu, T. Ince, J. Malik, M. E. H. Chowdhury, T. Hamid, R. Mazhar, A. Khandakar, A. Tahir, T. Rahman, and M. Gabbouj, “Blind ECG restoration by operational Cycle-GANs,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 3572–3581, 2022

    2022

  121. [129]

    An accurate non-accelerometer- based PPG motion artifact removal technique using CycleGAN,

    A. H. Afandizadeh Zargari, S. A. H. Aqajari, H. Khodabandeh, A. M. Rahmani, and F. J. Kurdahi, “An accurate non-accelerometer- based PPG motion artifact removal technique using CycleGAN,”ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023

    2023

  122. [130]

    Auto-denoising for eeg signals using generative adversarial network,

    Y . An, H. K. Lam, and S. H. Ling, “Auto-denoising for eeg signals using generative adversarial network,”Sensors, 2022

    2022

  123. [131]

    An approach for eeg denoising based on wasserstein generative adversarial network,

    Y . Dong, X. Tang, Q. Li, Y . Wang, N. Jiang, L. Tian, Y . Zheng, X. Li, S. Zhao, G. Li, and P. Fang, “An approach for eeg denoising based on wasserstein generative adversarial network,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2023

    2023

  124. [132]

    Feasibility of ecg reconstruction from minimal lead sets using convolutional neural networks,

    M. Matyschik, H. Mauranen, P. Bonizzi, and J. Karel, “Feasibility of ecg reconstruction from minimal lead sets using convolutional neural networks,”Computing in Cardiology, 2020

    2020

  125. [133]

    A denoising method of ecg signal based on variational autoencoder and masked convolution,

    Y . Xia, C. Chen, M. Shu, and R. Liu, “A denoising method of ecg signal based on variational autoencoder and masked convolution,”Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 80, pp. 81–90, 2023

    2023

  126. [134]

    Guiding masked representation learning to capture spatio-temporal relationship of electroencephalogra- phy,

    Y . Na, M. Park, Y . Tae, and S. Joo, “Guiding masked representation learning to capture spatio-temporal relationship of electroencephalogra- phy,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=WcOohbsF4H

    2024

  127. [135]

    Eeg signal denoising using beta- variational autoencoder,

    B. Mahaseni and N. M. Khan, “Eeg signal denoising using beta- variational autoencoder,”Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings, 2024

    2024

  128. [136]

    Maeeg: Masked auto-encoder for eeg representation learning,

    H.-Y . S. Chien, H. Goh, C. M. Sandino, and J. Y . Cheng, “Maeeg: Masked auto-encoder for eeg representation learning,” 2022

    2022

  129. [137]

    Using latent representations of muscle activation patterns to mitigate myoelectric interface noise,

    Y . Teh and L. J. Hargrove, “Using latent representations of muscle activation patterns to mitigate myoelectric interface noise,” in2021 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1148–1151

    2021

  130. [138]

    Diffecg: A versatile probabilistic diffusion model for ecg signals synthesis,

    N. Neifar, A. Ben-Hamadou, A. Mdhaffar, and M. Jm ¨aiel, “Diffecg: A versatile probabilistic diffusion model for ecg signals synthesis,” in2024 IEEE/ACIS 22nd International Conference on Software En- gineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), 2024, pp. 182–188

    2024

  131. [139]

    Filling of fetal heart rate signal: Diffusion model based on dimension construction and period segmentation,

    Z. Zhou, Z. Zhao, Y . Zhang, Y . Deng, S. Wang, H. Wu, and P. Jiao, “Filling of fetal heart rate signal: Diffusion model based on dimension construction and period segmentation,”IEEE Transactions on Con- sumer Electronics, 2024

    2024

  132. [140]

    Wavelet- based denoising diffusion models for ecg signal enhancement,

    L. E. El Bouny, M. Zouidine, K. Fakhar, and M. Khalil, “Wavelet- based denoising diffusion models for ecg signal enhancement,” in 2024 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Signal, Image, Video and Communications (ISIVC), 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  133. [141]

    Eddm: A novel ecg denoising method using dual-path diffusion model,

    Z. Li, Y . Tian, Y . Jin, X. Wei, M. Wang, J. Liu, and C. Liu, “Eddm: A novel ecg denoising method using dual-path diffusion model,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025

    2025

  134. [142]

    Eegdfus: A conditional diffusion model for fine-grained eeg denoising,

    X. Huang, C. Li, A. Liu, R. Qian, and X. Chen, “Eegdfus: A conditional diffusion model for fine-grained eeg denoising,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2025

    2025

  135. [143]

    Transconv- ddpm: Enhanced diffusion model for generating time-series data in healthcare,

    M. S. Kabir, S. Alamgeer, M. Debnath, and A. H. H. Ngu, “Transconv- ddpm: Enhanced diffusion model for generating time-series data in healthcare,” in2025 IEEE 49th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2025, pp. 866–875

    2025

  136. [144]

    Sdemg: Score-based diffusion model for surface electromyographic signal denoising,

    Y .-T. Liu, K.-C. Wang, K.-C. Liu, S.-Y . Peng, and Y . Tsao, “Sdemg: Score-based diffusion model for surface electromyographic signal denoising,” inICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 1736– 1740

    2024

  137. [145]

    Repaint high-density surface electromyography signal using denoising diffusion probabilistic model,

    Y . Zhao, J. Liao, X. Fang, H. Wang, N. Jiang, and J. He, “Repaint high-density surface electromyography signal using denoising diffusion probabilistic model,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2025

    2025

  138. [146]

    Tlbo optimization algorithm based-type2 fuzzy adaptive filter for ecg signals denoising,

    M. A. Ouali, M. Ghana ¨ı, and K. Chafaa, “Tlbo optimization algorithm based-type2 fuzzy adaptive filter for ecg signals denoising,”Traitement du Signal, 2020

    2020

  139. [147]

    Evaluating imputation strategies for handling missing data: A comparative study,

    T. C. Lwin, S. Tun, P. Tin, and T. T. Zin, “Evaluating imputation strategies for handling missing data: A comparative study,” in2023 IEEE 12th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), 2023, pp. 508–509

    2023

  140. [148]

    Stationary and sparse denoising approach for corticomuscular causality estimation,

    F. Abbas, V . McClelland, Z. Cvetkovic, and W. Dai, “Stationary and sparse denoising approach for corticomuscular causality estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1697–1707, 2025

    2025

  141. [149]

    Im- puting missing values in eeg with multivariate autoregressive models,

    A. Kanemura, Y . Cheng, T. Kaneko, K. Nozawa, and S. Fukunaga, “Im- puting missing values in eeg with multivariate autoregressive models,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings, 2018

    2018

  142. [150]

    Research on ar-akf model denoising of the emg signal,

    S. Chen, Z. Luo, and T. Hua, “Research on ar-akf model denoising of the emg signal,”Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2021. 18

    2021

  143. [151]

    Semg-based complex human in-hand motion recognition for dexterous robotic manipulation,

    Y . Xue, F. Ru, H. Du, K. Yin, P. Li, and Z. Ju, “Semg-based complex human in-hand motion recognition for dexterous robotic manipulation,” IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  144. [152]

    Clep- gan: an innovative approach to subject-independent ecg reconstruction from ppg signals,

    X. Li, S. Xu, F. Habib, N. Aminnejad, A. Gupta, and H. Huang, “Clep- gan: an innovative approach to subject-independent ecg reconstruction from ppg signals,”BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 306, 2025

    2025

  145. [153]

    Contactless blood pressure measurement via remote photoplethysmography with synthetic data generation using generative adversarial network,

    B.-F. Wu, L.-W. Chiu, Y .-C. Wu, C.-C. Lai, and P.-H. Chu, “Contactless blood pressure measurement via remote photoplethysmography with synthetic data generation using generative adversarial network,” in2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Worksh...

    2022

  146. [154]

    Eeg-gan: Generative adversarial networks for electroencephalograhic (eeg) brain signals,

    K. G. Hartmann, R. T. Schirrmeister, and T. Ball, “Eeg-gan: Generative adversarial networks for electroencephalograhic (eeg) brain signals,” 2018

    2018

  147. [155]

    Subject- independent eeg classification based on a hybrid neural network,

    H. Zhang, H. Ji, J. Yu, J. Li, L. Jin, L. Liu, Z. Bai, and C. Ye, “Subject- independent eeg classification based on a hybrid neural network,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 17, p. 1124089, 2023

    2023

  148. [156]

    Auditory-gan: deep learning framework for improved auditory spatial attention detection,

    T. Kausar, Y . Lu, M. A. Asghar, A. Kausar, S. Cai, S. Ahmed, and A. Almogren, “Auditory-gan: deep learning framework for improved auditory spatial attention detection,”PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 10, p. e2394, 2024

    2024

  149. [157]

    Maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform and improved cyclegan based eeg signal processing,

    M. R. Toppo and I. Ahmad, “Maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform and improved cyclegan based eeg signal processing,” in 2025 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT), 2025

    2025

  150. [158]

    Cardioflow: Learning to generate ecg from ppg with rectified flow,

    Y . Nambu, M. Kohjima, and R. Yamamoto, “Cardioflow: Learning to generate ecg from ppg with rectified flow,” inICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  151. [159]

    Ai modeling photoplethysmography to electrocardiography useful for predicting cardiovascular disease,

    Z. Ding, Y . Hu, Z. Li, Y . Mao, H. Li, D. Zhou, X. Chu, L. Yu, Z. Liu, F. Wu, H. Zhang, Q. Xu, T. Chen, and Z. Huang, “Ai modeling photoplethysmography to electrocardiography useful for predicting cardiovascular disease,”npj Digital Medicine, 2025

    2025

  152. [160]

    Biocross: A cross- modal framework for unified representation of multi-modal biosignals with heterogeneous metadata fusion,

    M. Wang, Z. Li, Y . Tian, X. Wei, Y . Jin, and C. Liu, “Biocross: A cross- modal framework for unified representation of multi-modal biosignals with heterogeneous metadata fusion,”Information Fusion, vol. 123, p. 103302, 2025

    2025

  153. [161]

    Synthetic ppg signal generation to improve coronary artery disease classification: Study with physical model of cardiovascular system,

    O. Mazumder, R. Banerjee, D. Roy, S. Bhattacharya, A. Ghose, and A. Sinha, “Synthetic ppg signal generation to improve coronary artery disease classification: Study with physical model of cardiovascular system,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2022

    2022

  154. [162]

    Standardized rppg signal generation based on generative adversarial networks,

    X. Tu, Y . Liu, M. Zhao, B. Liu, J. Liu, X. Lei, L. Xu, X. Zhu, Y . Wang, and Y . Huang, “Standardized rppg signal generation based on generative adversarial networks,”Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2024

    2024

  155. [163]

    Generation of atrial fibrillation elec- trocardiogram and atrial fibrillation classification based on bilstm-cnn generative adversarial network,

    Z. Chen, Y . Xu, and Y . Zhao, “Generation of atrial fibrillation elec- trocardiogram and atrial fibrillation classification based on bilstm-cnn generative adversarial network,” in2024 2nd International Conference on Computer, Vision and Intelligent Technology (ICCVIT), 2024, pp. 1–8

    2024

  156. [164]

    Synthetic time series data generation for healthcare applications: A pcg case study,

    A. Jamshidi, M. Arif, S. A. Kalhoro, and A. Gelbukh, “Synthetic time series data generation for healthcare applications: A pcg case study,” in2025 59th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  157. [165]

    Leveraging statistical shape priors in gan-based ecg synthesis,

    N. Neifar, A. Ben-Hamadou, A. Mdhaffar, M. Jmaiel, and B. Freisleben, “Leveraging statistical shape priors in gan-based ecg synthesis,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 36 002–36 015, 2024

    2024

  158. [166]

    4-class mi-eeg signal generation and recognition with cvae-gan,

    J. Yang, H. Yu, T. Shen, Y . Song, and Z. Chen, “4-class mi-eeg signal generation and recognition with cvae-gan,”Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2021

    2021

  159. [167]

    Leveraging synthetic subject invariant eeg signals for zero calibration bci,

    N. K. N. Aznan, A. Atapour-Abarghouei, S. Bonner, J. D. Connolly, and T. P. Breckon, “Leveraging synthetic subject invariant eeg signals for zero calibration bci,”Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2020

    2020

  160. [168]

    Generation of synthetic eeg data for training algorithms supporting the diagnosis of major depressive disorder,

    F. P. Carrle, Y . Hollenbenders, and A. Reichenbach, “Generation of synthetic eeg data for training algorithms supporting the diagnosis of major depressive disorder,”Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 17, 2023

    2023

  161. [169]

    Towards eeg generation using gans for bci applications,

    F. Fahimi, Z. Zhang, B. W. Goh, K. K. Ang, and C. Guan, “Towards eeg generation using gans for bci applications,” in2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), 2019, pp. 1–4

    2019

  162. [170]

    New synthetic goldmine: Hand joint angle-driven emg data generation framework for micro-gesture recognition,

    N. Wang, S. Wang, G. Li, P. Ren, and H. Su, “New synthetic goldmine: Hand joint angle-driven emg data generation framework for micro-gesture recognition,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2026, pp. 17 787–17 795

    2026

  163. [171]

    Feasibility of data- driven emg signal generation using a deep generative model,

    E. Campbell, J. A. D. Cameron, and E. Scheme, “Feasibility of data- driven emg signal generation using a deep generative model,” in2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2020, pp. 3755–3758

    2020

  164. [172]

    Generating high-fidelity synthetic ecg signals using deep autoencoder architectures,

    A. Riya and A. B. Queyam, “Generating high-fidelity synthetic ecg signals using deep autoencoder architectures,”2025 Artificial Intelli- gence and Smart Technologies for Sustainability Conference (AISTS), 2025

    2025

  165. [173]

    Examining the size of the latent space of con- volutional variational autoencoders trained with spectral topographic maps of eeg frequency bands,

    T. Ahmed and L. Longo, “Examining the size of the latent space of con- volutional variational autoencoders trained with spectral topographic maps of eeg frequency bands,”IEEE Access, 2022

    2022

  166. [174]

    Causal recurrent variational autoencoder for medical time series generation,

    H. Li, S. Yu, and J. Pr ´ıncipe, “Causal recurrent variational autoencoder for medical time series generation,”Proceedings of the AAAI Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 8562–8570, 2023

    2023

  167. [175]

    Eeg2vec: Learning affective eeg rep- resentations via variational autoencoders,

    D. Bethge, P. Hallgarten, T. Grosse-Puppendahl, M. Kari, L. L. Chuang, O. ¨Ozdenizci, and A. Schmidt, “Eeg2vec: Learning affective eeg rep- resentations via variational autoencoders,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2022, pp. 3150– 3157

    2022

  168. [176]

    Variational auto-encoder for extracting eeg representation,

    T. Zhao, Y . Cui, T. Ji, J. Luo, W. Li, J. Jiang, Z. Gao, W. Hu, Y . Yan, Y . Jiang, and B. Hong, “Variational auto-encoder for extracting eeg representation,”NeuroImage, vol. 304, p. 120946, 2024

    2024

  169. [177]

    Diffusion-based conditional ecg generation with structured state space models,

    J. M. L. Alcaraz and N. Strodthoff, “Diffusion-based conditional ecg generation with structured state space models,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 163, p. 107115, 2023

    2023

  170. [178]

    Ecg synthesis via diffusion-based state space augmented transformer,

    M. H. Zama and F. Schwenker, “Ecg synthesis via diffusion-based state space augmented transformer,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8328, 2023

    2023

  171. [179]

    Synthetic ecg signal generation using probabilistic diffusion models,

    E. Adib, A. S. Fernandez, F. Afghah, and J. J. Prevost, “Synthetic ecg signal generation using probabilistic diffusion models,”IEEE Access, 2023

    2023

  172. [180]

    Classifier- guided diffusion model for generating disease-specific ecg data: A case pilot study on inferior myocardial infarction,

    H. Chen, S. Kato, K. Eguchi, T. Kawaji, and M. Kano, “Classifier- guided diffusion model for generating disease-specific ecg data: A case pilot study on inferior myocardial infarction,”2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology So...

    2025

  173. [181]

    Diffusets: 12-lead ecg generation conditioned on clinical text reports and patient-specific information,

    Y . Lai, J. Chen, Q. Zhao, D. Zhang, Y . Wang, S. Geng, H. Li, and S. Hong, “Diffusets: 12-lead ecg generation conditioned on clinical text reports and patient-specific information,”Patterns, vol. 6, no. 10, p. 101291, 2025

    2025

  174. [182]

    Synthetic sleep eeg signal generation using latent diffusion models,

    B. Aristimunha, R. Y . de Camargo, S. Chevallier, O. Lucena, A. G. Thomas, M. J. Cardoso, W. H. L. Pinaya, and J. Dafflon, “Synthetic sleep eeg signal generation using latent diffusion models,” inDeep Generative Models for Health Workshop, NeurIPS 2023, 2023. [Online]. Availab...

    2023

  175. [183]

    Unconditional eeg synthesis based on diffusion models for sound generation,

    E. I. Chetkin, B. L. Kozyrskiy, and S. L. Shishkin, “Unconditional eeg synthesis based on diffusion models for sound generation,” in2024 IEEE International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON), 2024, pp. 416–420

    2024

  176. [184]

    Patchemg: Few-shot emg signal generation with diffusion models for data augmentation to improve classification performance,

    B. Xiong, W. Chen, H. Li, Y . Niu, N. Zeng, Z. Gan, and Y . Xu, “Patchemg: Few-shot emg signal generation with diffusion models for data augmentation to improve classification performance,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024

    2024

  177. [185]

    Gen- erating electrocardiogram signals by deep learning,

    N. Wulan, W. Wang, P. Sun, K. Wang, Y . Xia, and H. Zhang, “Gen- erating electrocardiogram signals by deep learning,”Neurocomputing, vol. 404, pp. 122–136, 2020

    2020

  178. [186]

    An artificial emg generation model based on signal-dependent noise and related application to motion classification,

    A. Furui, H. Hayashi, G. Nakamura, T. Chin, and T. Tsuji, “An artificial emg generation model based on signal-dependent noise and related application to motion classification,”PLOS ONE, 2017

    2017

  179. [187]

    Trans-cvae-gan: Transformer-based cvae-gan for high-fidelity eeg signal generation,

    Y . Yao, X. Wang, X. Hao, H. Sun, R. Dong, and Y . Li, “Trans-cvae-gan: Transformer-based cvae-gan for high-fidelity eeg signal generation,” Bioengineering, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1028, 2025

    2025

  180. [188]

    Denoising diffusion implicit mod- els,

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit mod- els,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=St1giarCHLP

    2021

  181. [189]

    Review of diffusion models and its applications in biomedical informatics,

    J. Luo, L. Yang, Y . Liu, C. Hu, G. Wang, and Y . Yang, “Review of diffusion models and its applications in biomedical informatics,”BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 390, 2025

    2025

  182. [190]

    Advancing electrocardiogram synthesis: Analyzing key metrics for enhanced evaluation,

    W. Wang, J. Ma, K. Wang, and Y . Lin, “Advancing electrocardiogram synthesis: Analyzing key metrics for enhanced evaluation,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 196, p. 110879, 2025

    2025

  183. [191]

    A novel approach for denoising electrocardiogram signals to detect cardiovascular diseases using an efficient hybrid scheme,

    P. Bing, W. Liu, Z. Zhai, J. Li, Z. Guo, Y . Xiang, B. He, and L. Zhu, “A novel approach for denoising electrocardiogram signals to detect cardiovascular diseases using an efficient hybrid scheme,”Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 11, p. 1277123, 2024

    2024

  184. [192]

    Robust reconstruction of electrocardiogram using pho- toplethysmography: A subject-based model,

    Q. Tang, Z. Chen, Y . Guo, Y . Liang, R. Ward, C. Menon, and M. Elgendi, “Robust reconstruction of electrocardiogram using pho- toplethysmography: A subject-based model,”Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 13, p. 859763, 2022. 19

    2022

  185. [193]

    Using dynamic time warping to find pat- terns in time series,

    D. J. Berndt and J. Clifford, “Using dynamic time warping to find pat- terns in time series,” inProceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 1994, pp. 359–370

    1994

  186. [194]

    Multimodal physiological signals from wearable sensors for affective computing: A systematic review,

    F. Li and D. Zhang, “Multimodal physiological signals from wearable sensors for affective computing: A systematic review,”Intelligent Sports and Health, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 210–222, 2025

    2025

  187. [195]

    Application of transfer learning for biomedical signals: A comprehensive review of the last decade (2014–2024),

    M. Jafari, X. Tao, P. D. Barua, and U. R. Acharya, “Application of transfer learning for biomedical signals: A comprehensive review of the last decade (2014–2024),”Information Fusion, vol. 118, p. 102982, 2025

    2014

  188. [196]

    Towards high-fidelity ecg generation: Evaluation via quality metrics and human feedback,

    M. Russo, J. Rebelo, N. Bento, and H. Gamboa, “Towards high-fidelity ecg generation: Evaluation via quality metrics and human feedback,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, vol. 1, 2025, pp. 1154–1165

    2025

  189. [197]

    Balancing privacy and health integrity: A novel framework for ecg signal analysis in immersive environments,

    V . Senthuran, U. Thayasivam, I. Natgunanathan, K. Sood, and Y . Xiang, “Balancing privacy and health integrity: A novel framework for ecg signal analysis in immersive environments,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 192, p. 110234, 2025

    2025

  190. [198]

    Artificial intelli- gence in software as a medical device,

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Artificial intelli- gence in software as a medical device,” https://www. fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/ artificial-intelligence-software-medical-device, content current as of Mar. 25, 2025; accessed Jun. 16, 2026

    2025

  191. [199]

    Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices,

    European Parliament and Council of the European Union, “Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices,” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/ 2017/745/oj, 2017, accessed Jun. 16, 2026

    2017

  192. [200]

    Guidance: MDCG en- dorsed documents and other guidance,

    European Commission, “Guidance: MDCG en- dorsed documents and other guidance,” https://health. ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/ guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance en, accessed Jun. 16, 2026

    2026

  193. [201]

    A scoping review of privacy and utility metrics in medical synthetic data,

    B. Kaabachi, J. Despraz, T. Meurers, K. Otte, M. Halilovic, B. Ku- lynych, F. Prasser, and J. L. Raisaro, “A scoping review of privacy and utility metrics in medical synthetic data,”npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, p. 58, 2025

    2025

  194. [202]

    Synthetic data generation methods for longitudinal and time series health data: a systematic review,

    M. Miletic and M. Sariyar, “Synthetic data generation methods for longitudinal and time series health data: a systematic review,”BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 30, 2026

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.