Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Quantized giant-graviton fluctuations in AdS5×SE5 reduce to Fock-Darwin/Landau systems whose lowest levels reproduce protected finite-N indices.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 07:54 UTC pith:KKFOKKTI

load-bearing objection Solid geometric generalization of the S5 giant-graviton quantization to SE5, with a clean T1,1 computation; the index match is real but rests on a regulator choice the authors themselves flag. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.02658 v1 pith:KKFOKKTI submitted 2026-07-02 hep-th

The giant graviton expansion in AdS₅timesSE₅

Alfredo Gonz\'alez Lezcano , Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas , Augniva Ray This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords giant graviton expansionSasaki-Einstein manifoldssuperconformal indexFock-Darwin systemQuantum Hall matrix modelT^{1,1}Klebanov-Witten theorylowest Landau level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that supersymmetric D3-branes wrapping three-cycles in AdS5 times a Sasaki-Einstein five-manifold, rotating at light speed along the Reeb vector, have protected fluctuations that localize to a charged-particle problem on a cone. Geometry enters only through the external potential and a conical deficit angle. For the round five-sphere this recovers the familiar Landau problem; for T1,1 the deficit is 2π/3 and the multi-brane Hilbert space is a U(m)×U(m) Quantum-Hall matrix model with bifundamental edge modes. Tracing the graded lowest-Landau-level states produces a giant-graviton contribution that exactly matches the zero-baryon sector of the finite-N superconformal index of the dual Klebanov-Witten quiver. The result isolates a universal local building block for protected BPS counting that works for an infinite family of AdS5/CFT4 pairs, not just maximal supersymmetry.

Core claim

Maximal supersymmetric giant-graviton-like D3-branes in AdS5 imes SE5 have fluctuations governed by a Fock-Darwin system on a cone whose conical deficit and potential are fixed by the transverse Kähler geometry; the protected lowest-Landau-level Hilbert space, quantized via a non-Abelian Quantum-Hall matrix model, yields the finite-N giant-graviton expansion of the superconformal index, recovering the dual Klebanov-Witten index in the zero-baryon sector for SE5=T1,1.

What carries the argument

The Fock-Darwin system on a cone (conical deficit 2π/3 for T1,1) whose lowest Landau level is realized by a U(m)×U(m) matrix model with bifundamental edge modes; this encodes the SE5 geometry and produces the graded index I_{U(m) imes U(m)}(q)=(-1)^m q^{mN} q^{m^{2}} ∏_{j=1}^m 1/(1-q^j)^{2}.

Load-bearing premise

The ratio of confining strength to magnetic field is fixed by hand so that the fugacity matches the R-charge grading of the field-theory index; without that matching the numerical prefactors in the expansion would not agree.

What would settle it

Compute the same zero-baryon protected index for the Klebanov-Witten theory at finite N by independent field-theory methods (or for another Y^{p,q}) and check whether the coefficients of the giant-graviton series exactly reproduce the predicted product formula including the conical-deficit powers.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Protected giant-graviton expansions exist for every toric SE5, not only the five-sphere.
  • Each toric fixed point supplies an independent local Landau-type system that can be quantized separately.
  • The conical deficit and potential completely determine the protected counting once the grading is fixed.
  • The same matrix-model technology extends, in principle, to AdS4 imes SE7 and other calibrated-brane expansions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gluing the local fixed-point Hilbert spaces should reconstruct the full zero-baryon BPS spectrum once baryonic fugacities are restored.
  • The same conical-Fock-Darwin reduction may organize microstate counting for supersymmetric black holes in these backgrounds.
  • Edge modes that restore the Mikhailov constraint are the gravitational dual of the bifundamental fields that appear in the dual quiver.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies supersymmetric probe D3-branes wrapping three-cycles in AdS5 imes SE5 (with emphasis on the transverse Kähler-Einstein structure of SE5), rotating at light speed along the Reeb vector. Maximal-angular-momentum configurations are identified with loci where the transverse Kähler potential diverges. Quadratic fluctuations about these maximal giants are reduced to a Fock-Darwin system whose geometry encodes the SE5 data via an external potential and a conical deficit; the protected sector is the lowest Landau level. For AdS5 imes T1,1 the authors quantize both single-cycle and zero-baryon multi-cycle configurations via U(m) and U(m) imes U(m) Quantum-Hall matrix models with (bi)fundamental edge modes, evaluate the resulting partition functions with Hall-Littlewood technology, and obtain protected indices that match the finite-N Klebanov-Witten index in the corresponding sectors (most explicitly Eq. (4.69)).

Significance. If the matching holds, the work supplies a concrete gravitational derivation of a protected finite-N index for a non-maximally supersymmetric AdS5 imes SE5 dual pair, extending the S5 giant-graviton/Landau-level technology of recent literature. The identification of the conical deficit and the bifundamental edge-mode structure as the geometric imprint of T1,1 is a clear technical advance, and the local Fock-Darwin building blocks offer a plausible universal mechanism for toric SE5. The explicit matrix-model evaluation (standard but carefully adapted) and the recovery of the product form of the index are reproducible strengths that strengthen the holographic dictionary for finite-N indices.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.4, after (4.40)] Section 4.4 (after Eq. (4.40) and the paragraph containing Eq. (4.41)): the ratio Ω^{2}/|ωc| is fixed by hand to the value 3/2 so that the LLL Hamiltonian grades precisely by H-R and the vacuum energy produces the correct power of qN. The text itself labels this a “regularization ambiguity inherent in the effective matrix model … uniquely fixed once the matching … is imposed.” Because the same matching is the central claim of recovery of the Klebanov-Witten index (Eq. (4.69) and the abstract), the numerical agreement is not an independent prediction. Either an a-priori derivation of the ratio from the supersymmetry algebra or the classical volume form is required, or the abstract/conclusions must be rephrased to state that the functional form (powers of mN and m^{2} together with the infinite products) is derived while the overall scale of q is fixed by BPS grading.
  2. [§4.3–4.4] Section 4.3–4.4: the classical Lagrangian is written on a cone of deficit 2π/3 (Eq. (4.27) and the coordinate change (4.25)), yet the subsequent non-Abelian matrix model and its Hall-Littlewood evaluation are the standard flat-space constructions of Dorey-Tong-Turner. On a cone the LLL wave-functions and the allowed angular-momentum spectrum are modified by the deficit; it is not obvious that the ordinary product formulae remain exact. A short argument that the conical identification is already absorbed into the definition of the complex coordinate (or an explicit conical matrix-model computation) is needed before the index (4.69) can be claimed to follow rigorously from the geometry.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.4] Section 4.4, line after (4.39): “Similarly to the 5 case” is a typographical remnant; it should read “S5 case”.
  2. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 caption and surrounding text: the location of the potential maximum is given as ρ∗=4/√e N; a brief remark that this lies outside the regime of validity of the quadratic fluctuation analysis would help the reader.
  3. [§3.1] Section 3.1: the unrefined limit u1=u2=1 is taken without comment on possible residual poles; a sentence pointing to the careful pole analysis of Imamura or Gaiotto-Lee would improve clarity.
  4. [Introduction / §2] References: the recent full-fluctuation analysis of Deddo-Jayaprakash-Liu-Pando Zayas (arXiv:2509.18252) is cited, but a more explicit comparison of which modes are retained versus discarded in the present “particular set” would be useful.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The T^{1,1} index powers of q^{mN} are obtained only after the free Fock-Darwin ratio Ω^{2}/|ω_c| is set by hand to 3/2 so that LLL grading coincides with H-R; the product structure is independent, but the overall fugacity identification is fixed by the matching being claimed.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§4.4 after (4.40) and the paragraph containing (4.41)]
    "which means that the lowest Landau level Hilbert space can be mapped to that of fluctuations of the BPS branes H−R, if Ω^{2}/|ω_c|=3/2 which again yields the natural regularization q=e^{-3/2 γ}. au We emphasize that this choice reflects a regularization ambiguity inherent in the effective matrix model description of the Landau/Fock-Darwin system au uniquely fixed once the matching to the semiclassical giant graviton sector is imposed."

    The free parameter of the effective Hamiltonian is fixed by the requirement that the LLL energy grades exactly as the protected combination H-R of the dual index. Once that value is inserted, the vacuum factor e^{-γ(3/4)mN} automatically becomes the field-theory power q^{mN/2} (or q^{mN} after the further rescaling that sets eq=e^{-3/4γ}). The agreement of the overall powers is therefore true by construction of the regulator, not an independent output of the gravitational matrix model.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§4.5 after (4.66), eqs. (4.68)–(4.69)]
    "We impose again (4.40) which implies x o e^{-γ 3/2}=q. Therefore we obtain I_{U(m)_1×U(m)_{-1}}(q)=(-1)^m q^{mN} q^{m^{2}} ∏_{j=1}^m 1/(1-q^j)^{2}."

    The same charge-matching condition used for the single-cycle case is re-imposed on the bifundamental matrix model. The resulting powers of q^{mN} and the identification x=q are therefore inherited from the earlier regulator choice rather than re-derived from the U(m)×U(m) dynamics; only the squared product and the m^{2} exponent are new.

full rationale

The functional form of the multi-giant partition function (Hall-Littlewood/Kostka evaluation of the U(m)×U(m) matrix model with bifundamental edge modes) is derived from the geometry of the two supersymmetric cycles and the standard Quantum-Hall calculation of Dorey-Tong-Turner; that part is non-circular. The classical vacuum energy 3/4 N likewise follows from the volume of the wrapped cycle. However, converting the Fock-Darwin Hamiltonian into the protected index requires an explicit choice of the free ratio Ω^{2}/|ω_c|. The paper sets this ratio to 3/2 (and the overall scale of γ) precisely so that the LLL grades by H-R and the vacuum factor becomes the field-theory power of q^{mN}. The authors themselves label the choice a “regularization ambiguity au uniquely fixed once the matching au is imposed.” Because that matching is the central claim of recovery of the Klebanov-Witten protected index, the numerical powers of q are not an independent prediction. The conical deficit is noted but never enters the multi-particle Hilbert-space count, so it does not rescue the grading step. The circularity is therefore limited to the overall fugacity normalization and does not infect the product structure; score 4 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard supergravity and matrix-model technology plus one regulator choice that is fixed by matching. No new particles or forces are postulated; the edge modes are imported from the Quantum-Hall literature. The only free parameter is the overall scale that converts the Fock-Darwin energy into the R-charge fugacity.

free parameters (1)
  • Ω^{2}/|\omega c| regulator ratio
    Fixed by hand to 3/2 (T1,1) or 1 (S5) so that the lowest-Landau-level energy grades exactly as the R-charge of the dual SCFT; the paper acknowledges this as a regularization ambiguity of the effective model.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Mikhailov’s holomorphic embedding of BPS giants as hypersurfaces in the Calabi-Yau cone
    Used throughout sections 2–4 to define the classical configurations; taken from the cited literature without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The protected sector of the superconformal index is captured by the lowest Landau level of the Fock-Darwin system after a Q-exact deformation
    Imported from the S5 analyses of Eleftheriou-Murthy-Rosselló and related works; the paper extends it but does not re-prove localization.
  • standard math Hall-Littlewood orthogonality and Kostka-polynomial expansions evaluate the U(m) and U(m) imes U(m) matrix-model partition functions
    Standard symmetric-function technology used in appendix A and section 4.5.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35253 in / 2784 out tokens · 29896 ms · 2026-07-12T07:54:07.674552+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study giant graviton-like D3-branes as probe configurations in type IIB supergravity backgrounds AdS$_5\times$SE$_5$, with emphasis on the structure of the five-dimensional Sasaki-Einstein manifolds SE$_5$. These configurations wrap supersymmetric three-cycles in SE$_5$ and rotate at the speed of light along the Reeb direction. We formulate the general problem in terms of the transverse K\"ahler potential and show that configurations carrying maximal angular momentum can be described by loci where the transverse K\"ahler potential diverges in suitably chosen coordinates. We quantize a particular set of excitations, similar to those considered in the AdS$_5\times S^5$ case, and show that they are governed by a Fock-Darwin problem with a conical deficit, which generalizes the Landau problem obtained for $S^5$. Succinctly, the information about the geometry of SE$_5$ is encoded in the form of the external potential and the conical deficit. We compute a protected contribution to the superconformal index arising from quantized fluctuations of supersymmetric giant graviton configurations. For the explicit case of AdS$_5\times T^{1,1}$, we recover the finite-N protected index of the dual quiver ${\cal N}=1$ superconformal field theory in the sector captured by a non-Abelian generalization of the quantized degrees of freedom.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 49 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Benvenuti, S

    S. Benvenuti, S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli and J. Sparks,An Infinite family of superconformal quiver gauge theories with Sasaki-Einstein duals,JHEP06(2005) 064 [hep-th/0411264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    J. M. Maldacena,The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    R. Arai, S. Fujiwara, Y. Imamura and T. Mori,Schur index of theN= 4U(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory via the AdS/CFT correspondence,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 086017 [2001.11667]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Imamura,Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT correspondence,PTEP2021 (2021) 123B05 [2108.12090]

    Y. Imamura,Finite-N superconformal index via the AdS/CFT correspondence,PTEP2021 (2021) 123B05 [2108.12090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. H. Lee,The giant graviton expansion,JHEP08(2024) 025 [2109.02545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Bourdier, N

    J. Bourdier, N. Drukker and J. Felix,The exact Schur index ofN= 4SYM,JHEP11 (2015) 210 [1507.08659]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Drukker,TheN= 4Schur index with Polyakov loops,JHEP12(2015) 012 [1510.02480]

    N. Drukker,TheN= 4Schur index with Polyakov loops,JHEP12(2015) 012 [1510.02480]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee and J. Lee,From giant gravitons to black holes,JHEP11(2023) 086 [2207.05172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Kim and E

    S. Kim and E. Lee,Holographic tests for giant graviton expansion,JHEP04(2025) 119 [2402.12924]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    H.-Y. Chen, N. Dorey, S. Moriyama, R. Mouland and C. Sanli,Giant gravitons and volume minimisation,JHEP08(2025) 121 [2412.05357]

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    J. H. Lee,Trace relations and open string vacua,JHEP02(2024) 224 [2312.00242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Eleftheriou, S

    G. Eleftheriou, S. Murthy and M. Rossell´ o,The giant graviton expansion inAdS 5 ×S 5, SciPost Phys.17(2024) 098 [2312.14921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Beccaria and A

    M. Beccaria and A. Cabo-Bizet,Large N Schur index ofN= 4 SYM from semiclassical D3 brane,JHEP04(2024) 110 [2402.12172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden,One-loop quantization of Euclidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds,JHEP06(2024) 073 [2402.16779]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    J. H. Lee and D. Stanford,Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations,2412.20769

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Eleftheriou, S

    G. Eleftheriou, S. Murthy and M. Rossell´ o,Localization and wall-crossing of giant graviton expansions in AdS 5,JHEP07(2025) 126 [2501.13910]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Deddo, J

    E. Deddo, J. T. Liu, L. A. Pando Zayas and R. J. Saskowski,Giant Graviton Expansion from Bubbling Geometry: Discreteness from Quantized Geometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 261501 [2402.19452]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Kinney, J

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat and W. Yan,On the Superconformal Index of N=1 IR Fixed Points: A Holographic Check,JHEP03(2011) 041 [1011.5278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Nakayama,Index for supergravity on AdS(5) x T**1,1 and conifold gauge theory,Nucl

    Y. Nakayama,Index for supergravity on AdS(5) x T**1,1 and conifold gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B755(2006) 295 [hep-th/0602284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Eager, J

    R. Eager, J. Schmude and Y. Tachikawa,Superconformal Indices, Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds, and Cyclic Homologies,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18(2014) 129 [1207.0573]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Mikhailov,Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces,JHEP11(2000) 027 [hep-th/0010206]

    A. Mikhailov,Giant gravitons from holomorphic surfaces,JHEP11(2000) 027 [hep-th/0010206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  23. [23]

    C. E. Beasley,BPS branes from baryons,JHEP11(2002) 015 [hep-th/0207125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    McGreevy, L

    J. McGreevy, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas,Invasion of the giant gravitons from Anti-de Sitter space,JHEP06(2000) 008 [hep-th/0003075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  25. [25]

    S. R. Das, A. Jevicki and S. D. Mathur,Vibration modes of giant gravitons,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 024013 [hep-th/0009019]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Arapoglu, N

    S. Arapoglu, N. S. Deger, A. Kaya, E. Sezgin and P. Sundell,Multispin giants,Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 106006 [hep-th/0312191]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Ouyang,Semiclassical quantization of giant gravitons,hep-th/0212228

    P. Ouyang,Semiclassical quantization of giant gravitons,hep-th/0212228

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Deddo, S

    E. Deddo, S. Jayaprakash, J. T. Liu and L. A. Pando Zayas,Quantized Giant Gravitons as the Periodic Table of Supersymmetric States: D3, M2 and M5,2509.18252

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    Biswas, D

    I. Biswas, D. Gaiotto, S. Lahiri and S. Minwalla,Supersymmetric states of N=4 Yang-Mills from giant gravitons,JHEP12(2007) 006 [hep-th/0606087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    A. P. Polychronakos,Quantum Hall states as matrix Chern-Simons theory,JHEP04(2001) 011 [hep-th/0103013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Dai, X.-J

    J. Dai, X.-J. Wang and Y.-S. Wu,Dynamics of giant-gravitons in the LLM geometry and the fractional quantum Hall effect,Nucl. Phys. B731(2005) 285 [hep-th/0508177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Fock,Bemerkung zur quantelung des harmonischen oszillators im magnetfeld,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik47(1928) 446

    V. Fock,Bemerkung zur quantelung des harmonischen oszillators im magnetfeld,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik47(1928) 446

    1928

  33. [33]

    C. G. Darwin,The diamagnetism of the free electron, inMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 27, pp. 86–90, Cambridge University Press, 1931

    1931

  34. [34]

    Drigho-Filho, S

    E. Drigho-Filho, S. Kuru, J. Negro and L. M. Nieto,Superintegrability of the Fock-Darwin system,1703.06634

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Ivanov, A

    E. Ivanov, A. Nersessian, S. Sidorov and H. Shmavonyan,Symmetries of deformed supersymmetric mechanics on K¨ ahler manifolds,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 025003 [1911.06290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Dorey, D

    N. Dorey, D. Tong and C. Turner,Matrix model for non-Abelian quantum Hall states,Phys. Rev. B94(2016) 085114 [1603.09688]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Dorey, D

    N. Dorey, D. Tong and C. Turner,A Matrix Model for WZW,JHEP08(2016) 007 [1604.05711]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Romelsberger,Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl

    C. Romelsberger,Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B747(2006) 329 [hep-th/0510060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,0707.3702

    C. Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,0707.3702

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Imamura,Analytic continuation for giant gravitons,PTEP2022(2022) 103B02 [2205.14615]

    Y. Imamura,Analytic continuation for giant gravitons,PTEP2022(2022) 103B02 [2205.14615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. Berkooz, A. Naqvi and M. J. Strassler,Giant gravitons in conformal field theory,JHEP04(2002) 034 [hep-th/0107119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  42. [42]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks and D. Waldram,Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S(2) x S(3),Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 711 [hep-th/0403002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  43. [43]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks,Toric geometry, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and a new infinite class of AdS/CFT duals,Commun. Math. Phys.262(2006) 51 [hep-th/0411238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Forcella, A

    D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He and A. Zaffaroni,The Master Space of N=1 Gauge Theories,JHEP08(2008) 012 [0801.1585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Arean, D

    D. Arean, D. E. Crooks and A. V. Ramallo,Supersymmetric probes on the conifold,JHEP 11(2004) 035 [hep-th/0408210]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    Canoura, J

    F. Canoura, J. D. Edelstein, L. A. Pando Zayas, A. V. Ramallo and D. Vaman, Supersymmetric branes onAdS(5)x×Y (p,q) and their field theory duals,JHEP03(2006) 101 [hep-th/0512087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Canoura, J

    F. Canoura, J. D. Edelstein and A. V. Ramallo,D-brane probes on L(a,b,c) superconformal field theories,JHEP09(2006) 038 [hep-th/0605260]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Berenstein, C

    D. Berenstein, C. P. Herzog and I. R. Klebanov,Baryon spectra and AdS /CFT correspondence,JHEP06(2002) 047 [hep-th/0202150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Hamilton, J

    A. Hamilton, J. Murugan and A. Prinsloo,Lessons from giant gravitons onAdS 5 ×T 1,1, JHEP06(2010) 017 [1001.2306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    Fujiwara,Schur-like index of the Klebanov-Witten theory via the AdS/CFT correspondence,2302.04697

    S. Fujiwara,Schur-like index of the Klebanov-Witten theory via the AdS/CFT correspondence,2302.04697

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Benetti Genolini, C

    P. Benetti Genolini, C. Couzens and A. L¨ uscher,Probing black holes with equivariant localization,2604.26786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Gopakumar and E

    R. Gopakumar and E. A. Mazenc,Deriving the Simplest Gauge-String Duality – I: Open-Closed-Open Triality,2212.05999

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Gopakumar, R

    R. Gopakumar, R. Kaushik, S. Komatsu, E. A. Mazenc and D. Sarkar,Strings from Feynman Diagrams,2412.13397

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Reshetikhin,The bethe ansatz and the combinatorics of young tableaux, Journal of Soviet Mathematics41(1988) 925. – 38 –

    1988