Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 128 references

Memory load stored in a black hole can shift the frequencies of waves from black-hole mergers and can far exceed the information in the collapsing source.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:34 UTC pith:TD53UB37

load-bearing objection Solid extension of the authors' MB program with a usable signed QNM shift and a clean two-particle maximal-load argument; the master-mode-to-frequency dictionary remains the softest step. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03560 v1 pith:TD53UB37 submitted 2026-07-03 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

Black Hole Memory Burden and its Signatures in Gravitational Waves from Mergers

Gia Dvali , Michael Zantedeschi , Sebastian Zell This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th
keywords memory burdenblack holesquasinormal modesgravitational wavesinformation storageBH mergersringdown
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the information a black hole carries backreacts on classical perturbations through the swift memory-burden effect, imprinting a measurable shift on the frequencies of gravitational waves emitted in the ringdown. It shows that this memory load is set by both the features of the collapsing matter and the microscopic encoding of those features into gapless memory modes, and that the load can be maximal even when the progenitor is almost featureless, as in a two-particle collision. Bounds are derived for stellar-collapse black holes, and a concrete formula relates the frequency shift to the memory-load parameter and a critical exponent. If correct, gravitational-wave observations become a probe of how black holes store information and of their formation history.

Core claim

Swift memory burden modifies the classical response of a black hole to perturbations, shifting the frequencies of its quasinormal modes according to f = f_R (1 − μ^{-1} (−|δg|^{2})^{p−1}). The memory-load parameter μ can saturate its theoretical maximum even for nearly featureless progenitors such as two-particle collisions, because the black hole forms in a fully entangled superposition of microstates. For stellar collapse the paper supplies bounds on μ that depend on how efficiently source features are encoded, turning existing merger data into constraints on the encoding mechanism and on the critical exponent p.

What carries the argument

The memory-burden parameter μ (relative weight of the information load) together with the effective master-mode gap that sets the resonant frequency of the outgoing gravitational waves.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that a single master-mode energy gap, deformed by the memory load, sets the resonant frequency of the waves radiated in ringdown, and that the system does not remain on a trajectory that keeps memory modes gapless.

What would settle it

A high-precision ringdown-frequency measurement of a stellar-mass merger that shows no shift of the size predicted by the paper’s frequency formula for the μ range expected from stellar collapse, while independent mass and spin estimates remain consistent with general relativity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Ringdown spectra can constrain the critical exponent p once μ is estimated from formation history.
  • Black holes formed in two-particle collisions or certain early-universe processes should display maximal memory burden and the largest frequency shifts.
  • Existing events such as GW250114 already bound the allowed range of μ and p for stellar-origin black holes.
  • Primordial and astrophysical black holes can be distinguished by the size of the memory-burden-induced frequency shift.
  • In the strong-memory-burden regime the nonlinear merger waveform itself would be altered, affecting mass inference and template matching.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the encoding mechanism is inefficient, stellar black holes may still carry large enough μ^{-1} that next-generation detectors could resolve the shift without needing primordial candidates.
  • The same entanglement argument that forces maximal load in two-particle formation may apply to other highly symmetric collapses, offering a formation-channel diagnostic independent of electromagnetic counterparts.
  • A non-detection of any frequency shift at the predicted level would force either a null-memory-burden trajectory or a revision of the master-mode–radiation resonance assumption.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies the swift memory-burden (SMB) framework to black-hole mergers and ringdown. Starting from the effective Hamiltonian (2) with gap function (3), it derives a frequency shift for quasinormal modes, Eq. (17), f = f_R (1 - μ^{-1} (-|δg|^2)^{p-1}), and argues that the sign of the shift depends on the parity of the critical exponent p. It further claims that the memory-load parameter μ is not fixed by the information content of the progenitor alone: a BH formed in a two-particle collision materializes in a fully entangled superposition of microstates and therefore saturates the maximal load μ ~ 1/(p √ S) (Sec. IV.A), while stellar collapse yields only broad bounds that span many orders of magnitude depending on the (unknown) encoding efficiency (Sec. IV.D). The authors conclude that GW spectroscopy can therefore probe both the microscopic encoding of BH information and the formation channel of the remnant.

Significance. If the identification of the master-mode gap E_0 with the radiated QNM frequency is correct, the work supplies a concrete, observationally accessible signature of black-hole information load and a new macroscopic parameter μ that is basis-independent. The two-particle-collision argument that maximal MB can arise from a nearly featureless initial state is a sharp, falsifiable claim that links unitarity bounds on multi-particle production to classical GW observables. The paper also improves earlier estimates of μ for stellar progenitors and clarifies that both infrared and ultraviolet shifts are possible. These elements make the manuscript a potentially useful bridge between quantum-information models of black holes and LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA ringdown data, provided the central dictionary is secured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A–B, Eqs. (13)–(17)] Sec. III.A–B, Eqs. (13)–(17): the entire observational claim rests on the assertion that the deformed master-mode gap E_0 sets the resonant frequency of the radiated QNM. This identification is introduced by physical reasoning (“the BH constantly scans the radiation modes… E_0 sets the energy scale”) and by the coherent-state dictionary |δg|^2 ~ |Δn_0|/S, but is never derived from a linearized wave equation (Teukolsky/Regge–Wheeler) on a memory-burdened background, nor is the coupling of angular-momentum memory modes to the metric perturbation demonstrated. Without that step, Eq. (17) is not a prediction for ringdown spectroscopy. A minimal calculation that recovers the usual QNM spectrum when μ o ∞ and shows how E_0 enters the effective potential would secure the claim; otherwise the GW probe evaporates.
  2. [Sec. III.C] Sec. III.C: the paper dismisses null-MB trajectories (gap functions that remain zero under the perturbation) on the grounds that generic initial data do not respect them and that no known dynamics preserves them. This is plausible but not proven; if even a subset of astrophysically relevant mergers can evolve on or near a null surface, the predicted shift is suppressed or absent. A quantitative estimate of the measure of such trajectories, or an explicit dynamical argument that they are unstable, is needed before the frequency-shift formula can be treated as generic.
  3. [Sec. IV.D] Sec. IV.D, Eqs. (34)–(41): the stellar-collapse estimates of μ range from ~10^{-12} to ~10^{66} according to whether correlations among source features are ignored or maximized. Because no preferred encoding mechanism is supplied, the resulting bound on p via Eq. (18) is essentially unconstrained by existing data. The abstract and conclusion statements that GW observations already probe the encoding mechanism therefore overstate what the present calculation delivers; the section should be reframed as a parametric survey rather than a derivation of observational bounds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B, footnote 3] The formula used in Ref. [29] is criticized in footnote 3 for failing two consistency conditions; a short explicit comparison of the two expressions would help the reader assess the difference.
  2. [Figs. 1–2] Figs. 1 and 2 are illustrative but the caption parameters (ϵ_k = √ S r_g^{-1}, N_P = S or S/3) are not stated in the main text; a brief sentence would improve readability.
  3. [Sec. III.B] The mild frequency dependence mentioned after Eq. (17) is absorbed into a redefinition of |δg|; it would be useful to state the expected size of the residual correction for typical ringdown frequencies.
  4. Typographical: “asympotically” → “asymptotically” (p. 5); “ins-wave” → “in s-wave” (p. 7).

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Frequency-shift formula (Eq. 17) and uniqueness of the master-mode Hamiltonian/gap are load-bearing on the authors' prior MB framework and self-citations; new μ estimates for progenitors remain independent.

specific steps
  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Sec. II.A (after Eq. 2–3)]
    "First, up to inessential variations, one uniquely arrives at this structure in describing any consistent quantum system with efficient information storage [3–5, 8, 30–34]."

    The uniqueness of the Hamiltonian (2) plus gap function (3) that generates the entire MB effect and the subsequent frequency shift is declared forced by reference only to the authors' own prior papers, treating the choice as an external mathematical fact rather than re-deriving or independently justifying it here.

  2. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sec. II.A, Eq. (3)]
    "the essence of the phenomenon is well captured by the following gap functions [3–5, 31]: Ek(n0)=(1−n0/Nc)p ϵk , where ϵk is the free energy gap of memory modes, 1/Nc sets the strength of an attractive interaction (with Nc≫1), and p is an a priori undetermined critical exponent."

    The concrete power-law gap form (including free exponent p) that later produces the frequency shift (17) is adopted by citation to the authors' earlier prototype papers; the present work does not re-derive the functional form from a microscopic calculation but uses it as given.

  3. self citation load bearing [Sec. III.A–B (derivation of Eq. 17)]
    "Following [9], we shall now apply the SMB effect to BH mergers. … the BH constantly scans the radiation modes to find a resonant partner, E0 sets the energy scale of emitted radiation [9]. Thus, the only remaining task is to relate Δn0 to the perturbation of the BH metric. … a frequency fR is shifted to f=fR(1−μ−1(−|δg|2)p−1), as already summarized in eq. (1)."

    The decisive identification that the deformed master-mode gap E0 equals the resonant QNM frequency (the step that turns the abstract MB model into a concrete GW prediction) is taken directly from the authors' prior paper [9]; without that self-cited dictionary Eq. 17 does not follow from the linearized wave equation and the claimed spectroscopic probe of μ and p disappears.

full rationale

The paper's central GW prediction (Eq. 17) is obtained by taking the effective master-mode gap E0 from the authors' earlier Hamiltonian (2) with gap ansatz (3), identifying E0 with the radiated QNM frequency via physical reasoning that cites only their own [9], and converting Δn0 via the coherent-state dictionary (15). Uniqueness of that structure is asserted solely by self-citations. This is moderate circularity: the derivation reduces to the prior MB model by construction rather than an independent first-principles calculation of the Teukolsky/Regge–Wheeler spectrum on a memory-burdened background. At the same time the novel estimates of μ for two-particle collisions (maximal load via entangled superposition) and stellar collapse (bounds spanning many orders of magnitude) are independent of the observational QNM bounds later discussed, and no parameters are fitted to data and then re-predicted. Hence the score is 4 rather than higher; the work has genuine new content on formation history while the spectroscopic formula inherits its load-bearing ingredients.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effective master/memory Hamiltonian and gap function introduced in earlier MB papers, on the coherent-state dictionary that converts occupation-number shifts into metric perturbations, and on the assumption that the master-mode gap sets the radiated frequency. No free parameters are fitted to data; p and μ remain free phenomenological parameters whose ranges are estimated from formation scenarios. The only invented entities are the master and memory modes themselves, which are postulated as the microscopic carriers of BH information.

free parameters (2)
  • critical exponent p
    Appears in the gap function (3) and controls both the onset of MB (11) and the direction/magnitude of the frequency shift (17). Left undetermined; only integer values are considered for sign arguments.
  • memory-load parameter μ
    Defined by (5) as the ratio of master-mode energy to pattern energy. Estimated from formation scenarios but not fixed; the observational bound (18) is a joint constraint on μ and p.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The effective Hamiltonian (2) with gap function E_k(n_0)=(1-n_0/N_c)^p ϵ_k correctly describes BH information storage near criticality.
    Taken from the authors' prior MB series and used throughout Sec. II–III without re-derivation from a UV-complete theory.
  • domain assumption Metric perturbation and master-mode occupation are related by |δg|^2 ~ |Δn_0|/S (Eq. 15).
    Follows from the coherent-state N-portrait of the BH metric; enters the frequency-shift formula directly.
  • ad hoc to paper The radiated GW frequency tracks the instantaneous effective gap E_0 of the master mode.
    Stated in Sec. III.A as the mechanism that imprints MB onto the spectrum; not derived from a full wave-equation analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper Generic perturbations do not remain on a null-MB surface that would keep memory modes gapless.
    Sec. III.C dismisses null trajectories on the grounds that they are non-generic and not preserved by evolution; if false, the predicted shift vanishes.
  • domain assumption A BH formed in a two-particle collision materializes in a fully entangled superposition of all microstates (Eq. 24).
    Used to conclude maximal memory load; rests on unitarity and the exponential microstate counting of [40,95].
invented entities (2)
  • master mode and memory modes of a black hole no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the microscopic degrees of freedom that store information and generate the memory-burden back-reaction.
    Postulated as the effective description of BH microstates in the N-portrait; no independent laboratory detection outside the MB framework.
  • memory-load parameter μ no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantify the fraction of used memory space that controls the strength of the back-reaction.
    Defined by Eq. (5); its value is estimated from formation scenarios but is not measured independently of the MB effect itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 28745 in / 3465 out tokens · 24922 ms · 2026-07-12T01:34:26.186996+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Swift memory burden (MB) implies that the information stored in a black hole (BH) can modify its classical dynamics when the BH is perturbed. This influences the gravitational waves (GWs) emitted during BH mergers. In this paper, we investigate how the BH memory load is determined by the features of the collapsing source. We show that the memory load can vastly exceed the information content of its progenitor. An extreme example is a BH formed in a two-particle collision, which exhibits maximal MB. We then derive bounds for BHs formed through stellar collapse and examine the impact of swift MB on BH quasinormal modes, quantifying the MB-induced frequency shift of GWs. These findings imply that GW observations probe the fundamental mechanisms of BH information storage as well as their formation history.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03560 by Gia Dvali, Michael Zantedeschi, Sebastian Zell.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Hamiltonian for the master mode ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Effective gap of the master mode ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 91 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    This number is basis-independent, i.e

    The first one is the diversity of theuncorrelatedfea- tures of the source, which we shall denote by ˜NP . This number is basis-independent, i.e. it is inde- pendent of the choice and labeling of the degrees of freedom describing the source

  2. [2]

    simplistic picture

    The second quantity is the total number of features. This can be much larger than ˜NP if there exist cor- relations among the features of the source. This number is basis-dependent in the sense that it de- pends on the number and the diversity of degrees of freedom that are used to label the state of the source. After the source collapses, the features ar...

  3. [3]

    We derive observational signatures of swift MB in terms ofµ −1 andp

  4. [4]

    Regarding the first item, we have elaborated on the pre- dictions of swift MB for quasinormal modes (QNMs)

    We study howµ −1 is determined by various col- lapsing sources. Regarding the first item, we have elaborated on the pre- dictions of swift MB for quasinormal modes (QNMs). Our main result is the frequency shift given in eq. (17), which is a function of the critical exponentpand the memory loadµ −1. With this we reproduced the earlier result of [9] but gen...

  5. [5]

    Black holes and entropy,

    Jacob D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7, 2333–2346 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199–220 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  7. [7]

    A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory,

    Gia Dvali, “A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory,” (2018), arXiv:1810.02336 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Universe’s Primordial Quantum Memories,

    Gia Dvali, Lukas Eisemann, Marco Michel, and Sebas- tian Zell, “Universe’s Primordial Quantum Memories,” JCAP03, 010 (2019), arXiv:1812.08749 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Black hole metamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden,

    Gia Dvali, Lukas Eisemann, Marco Michel, and Sebas- tian Zell, “Black hole metamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden,” Phys. Rev. D102, 103523 (2020), arXiv:2006.00011 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    How special are black holes? Cor- respondence with objects saturating unitarity bounds in generic theories,

    Gia Dvali, Oleg Kaikov, and Juan Sebasti´ an Val- buena Berm´ udez, “How special are black holes? Cor- respondence with objects saturating unitarity bounds in generic theories,” Phys. Rev. D105, 056013 (2022), arXiv:2112.00551 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    New mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter from the memory burden effect,

    Ana Alexandre, Gia Dvali, and Emmanouil Koutsan- gelas, “New mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter from the memory burden effect,” Phys. Rev. D110, 036004 (2024), arXiv:2402.14069 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Memory burden effect in black holes and solitons: Implications for PBH,

    Gia Dvali, Juan Sebasti´ an Valbuena-Berm´ udez, and Michael Zantedeschi, “Memory burden effect in black holes and solitons: Implications for PBH,” Phys. Rev. D110, 056029 (2024), arXiv:2405.13117 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Swift Memory Burden in Merging Black Holes: how information load affects black hole’s clas- sical dynamics,

    Gia Dvali, “Swift Memory Burden in Merging Black Holes: how information load affects black hole’s clas- sical dynamics,” (2025), arXiv:2509.22540 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,” Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    GWTC- 2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Ob- serving Run,

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC- 2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Ob- serving Run,” Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Rela- tivity with GW250114,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), “Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Rela- tivity with GW250114,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 041403 (2026), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of General Relativity with GW170817,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the sec- ond LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the sec- ond LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog,” Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]. 14

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,

    Tullio Regge and John A. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1063–1069 (1957)

    1957

  27. [27]

    Gravitational field of a particle falling in a schwarzschild geometry analyzed in tensor harmonics,

    F. J. Zerilli, “Gravitational field of a particle falling in a schwarzschild geometry analyzed in tensor harmonics,” Phys. Rev. D2, 2141–2160 (1970)

    1970

  28. [28]

    Scattering of Gravitational Radi- ation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole,

    C. V. Vishveshwara, “Scattering of Gravitational Radi- ation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole,” Nature227, 936– 938 (1970)

    1970

  29. [29]

    Long Wave Trains of Gravitational Waves from a Vibrating Black Hole,

    William H. Press, “Long Wave Trains of Gravitational Waves from a Vibrating Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 170, L105–L108 (1971)

    1971

  30. [30]

    Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general rel- ativity through gravitational wave observations,

    Olaf Dreyer, Bernard J. Kelly, Badri Krishnan, Lee Samuel Finn, David Garrison, and Ramon Lopez- Aleman, “Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general rel- ativity through gravitational wave observations,” Class. Quant. Grav.21, 787–804 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0309007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair the- orem with black hole ringdowns,

    S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair the- orem with black hole ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. D85, 124056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5819 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,

    Emanuele Bertiet al., “Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,” (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Constraining the Swift Memory Burden Effect with GW250114-like Events,

    Chen Yuan and Richard Brito, “Constraining the Swift Memory Burden Effect with GW250114-like Events,” (2025), arXiv:2510.19916 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Critically excited states with enhanced memory and pattern recognition capacities in quan- tum brain networks: Lesson from black holes,

    Gia Dvali, “Critically excited states with enhanced memory and pattern recognition capacities in quan- tum brain networks: Lesson from black holes,” (2017), arXiv:1711.09079 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Area law microstate entropy from critical- ity and spherical symmetry,

    Gia Dvali, “Area law microstate entropy from critical- ity and spherical symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D97, 105005 (2018), arXiv:1712.02233 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Black Holes as Brains: Neural Networks with Area Law Entropy,

    Gia Dvali, “Black Holes as Brains: Neural Networks with Area Law Entropy,” Fortsch. Phys.66, 1800007 (2018), arXiv:1801.03918 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Classicalization Clearly: Quantum Transi- tion into States of Maximal Memory Storage Capacity,

    Gia Dvali, “Classicalization Clearly: Quantum Transi- tion into States of Maximal Memory Storage Capacity,” (2018), arXiv:1804.06154 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Find- ing critical states of enhanced memory capacity in at- tractive cold bosons,

    Gia Dvali, Marco Michel, and Sebastian Zell, “Find- ing critical states of enhanced memory capacity in at- tractive cold bosons,” EPJ Quant. Technol.6, 1 (2019), arXiv:1805.10292 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Quantum Gravity in Species Regime,

    Gia Dvali, “Quantum Gravity in Species Regime,” (2021), arXiv:2103.15668 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Saturon Dark Matter,

    Gia Dvali, “Saturon Dark Matter,” (2023), arXiv:2302.08353 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Transitioning to Memory Burden: Detectable Small Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,

    Gia Dvali, Michael Zantedeschi, and Sebastian Zell, “Transitioning to Memory Burden: Detectable Small Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” (2025), arXiv:2503.21740 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Similarities in the evaporation of saturated solitons and black holes,

    Giacomo Contri, Gia Dvali, and Otari Sakhelashvili, “Similarities in the evaporation of saturated solitons and black holes,” Phys. Rev. D112, 125027 (2025), arXiv:2509.08049 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    The Role of Microstate Degeneracy in Phase Transitions: Gravitational Waves from Bubble Entanglement,

    Gia Dvali and Lucy Komisel, “The Role of Microstate Degeneracy in Phase Transitions: Gravitational Waves from Bubble Entanglement,” (2025), arXiv:2512.13947 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Entropy Bound and Unitarity of Scattering Amplitudes,

    Gia Dvali, “Entropy Bound and Unitarity of Scattering Amplitudes,” JHEP03, 126 (2021), arXiv:2003.05546 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cos- mological Model,

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, “The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cos- mological Model,” Sov. Astron.10, 602 (1967)

    1967

  46. [46]

    Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,

    Stephen Hawking, “Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.152, 75 (1971)

    1971

  47. [47]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    Bernard J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168, 399–415 (1974)

    1974

  48. [48]

    Cosmological effects of primordial black holes,

    George F. Chapline, “Cosmological effects of primordial black holes,” Nature253, 251–252 (1975)

    1975

  49. [49]

    The Primordial black hole mass spec- trum,

    Bernard J. Carr, “The Primordial black hole mass spec- trum,” Astrophys. J.201, 1–19 (1975)

    1975

  50. [50]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,

    Bernard Carr and Florian Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355–394 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,

    Anne M. Green and Bradley J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,” J. Phys. G 48, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Breakdown of hawking evaporation opens new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter can- didate,

    Valentin Thoss, Andreas Burkert, and Kazunori Kohri, “Breakdown of hawking evaporation opens new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter can- didate,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.532, 451–459 (2024), arXiv:2402.17823 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Primordial black holes from confinement,

    Gia Dvali, Florian K¨ uhnel, and Michael Zantedeschi, “Primordial black holes from confinement,” Phys. Rev. D104, 123507 (2021), arXiv:2108.09471 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Stochastic gravitational-wave background at 3G detectors as a smoking gun for microscopic dark matter relics,

    Gabriele Franciolini and Paolo Pani, “Stochastic gravitational-wave background at 3G detectors as a smoking gun for microscopic dark matter relics,” Phys. Rev. D108, 083527 (2023), arXiv:2304.13576 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Probing modified Hawking evaporation with gravitational waves from the primordial black hole dominated universe,

    Shyam Balaji, Guillem Dom` enech, Gabriele Franciolini, Alexander Ganz, and Jan Tr¨ ankle, “Probing modified Hawking evaporation with gravitational waves from the primordial black hole dominated universe,” JCAP11, 026 (2024), arXiv:2403.14309 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Quantum effects on the evapora- tion of PBHs: contributions to dark matter,

    Md Riajul Haque, Suvashis Maity, Debaprasad Maity, and Yann Mambrini, “Quantum effects on the evapora- tion of PBHs: contributions to dark matter,” JCAP07, 002 (2024), arXiv:2404.16815 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Gravitational wave signatures of cogene- sis from a burdened PBH,

    Basabendu Barman, Md Riajul Haque, and ´Oscar Zapata, “Gravitational wave signatures of cogene- sis from a burdened PBH,” JCAP09, 020 (2024), arXiv:2405.15858 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Memory burden ef- fect mimics reheating signatures on SGWB from ultra- low mass PBH domination,

    Nilanjandev Bhaumik, Md Riajul Haque, Rajeev Ku- mar Jain, and Marek Lewicki, “Memory burden ef- fect mimics reheating signatures on SGWB from ultra- low mass PBH domination,” JHEP10, 142 (2024), arXiv:2409.04436 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Constraining burdened PBHs with gravitational waves,

    Basabendu Barman, Kousik Loho, and ´Oscar Zap- ata, “Constraining burdened PBHs with gravitational waves,” JCAP10, 065 (2024), arXiv:2409.05953 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Induced gravitational waves probing pri- mordial black hole dark matter with the memory burden effect,

    Kazunori Kohri, Takahiro Terada, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida, “Induced gravitational waves probing pri- mordial black hole dark matter with the memory burden effect,” Phys. Rev. D111, 063543 (2025), arXiv:2409.06365 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Successful cogenesis of baryon and dark matter from memory-burdened PBH,

    Debasish Borah and Nayan Das, “Successful cogenesis of baryon and dark matter from memory-burdened PBH,” JCAP02, 031 (2025), arXiv:2410.16403 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Light burden of mem- 15 ory: Constraining primordial black holes with high- energy neutrinos,

    Marco Chianese, Andrea Boccia, Fabio Iocco, Gennaro Miele, and Ninetta Saviano, “Light burden of mem- 15 ory: Constraining primordial black holes with high- energy neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D111, 063036 (2025), arXiv:2410.07604 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Ultralight black holes as sources of high-energy particles,

    Michael Zantedeschi and Luca Visinelli, “Ultralight black holes as sources of high-energy particles,” Phys. Dark Univ.49, 102034 (2025), arXiv:2410.07037 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Inflationary and gravitational wave signatures of small primordial black holes as dark matter,

    Will Barker, Benjamin Gladwyn, and Sebastian Zell, “Inflationary and gravitational wave signatures of small primordial black holes as dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 123033 (2025), arXiv:2410.11948 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Constraints on the primordial black hole abun- dance through scalar-induced gravitational waves from Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s first three observing runs,

    Yang Jiang, Chen Yuan, Chong-Zhi Li, and Qing-Guo Huang, “Constraints on the primordial black hole abun- dance through scalar-induced gravitational waves from Advanced LIGO and Virgo’s first three observing runs,” JCAP12, 016 (2024), arXiv:2409.07976 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Gravitational waves from burdened primordial black holes dark matter,

    Ngo Phuc Duc Loc, “Gravitational waves from burdened primordial black holes dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D111, 023509 (2025), arXiv:2410.17544 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Beyond Hawking evaporation of black holes formed by dark matter in compact stars,

    Ujjwal Basumatary, Nirmal Raj, and Anupam Ray, “Beyond Hawking evaporation of black holes formed by dark matter in compact stars,” Phys. Rev. D111, L041306 (2025), arXiv:2410.22702 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Black hole ex- plosions as probes of new physics,

    Kevin Federico and Stefano Profumo, “Black hole ex- plosions as probes of new physics,” Phys. Rev. D111, 063006 (2025), arXiv:2411.17038 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Impact of memory-burdened black holes on primordial gravita- tional waves in light of Pulsar Timing Array,

    Peter Athron, Marco Chianese, Satyabrata Datta, Rome Samanta, and Ninetta Saviano, “Impact of memory-burdened black holes on primordial gravita- tional waves in light of Pulsar Timing Array,” JCAP 05, 005 (2025), arXiv:2411.19286 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Asymmetries from a charged memory-burdened PBH,

    Basabendu Barman, Kousik Loho, and ´Oscar Zapata, “Asymmetries from a charged memory-burdened PBH,” JCAP02, 052 (2025), arXiv:2412.13254 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Axion misalignment with memory-burdened PBH,

    Disha Bandyopadhyay, Debasish Borah, and Nayan Das, “Axion misalignment with memory-burdened PBH,” JCAP04, 039 (2025), arXiv:2501.04076 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Impact of memory-burdened primordial black holes on high-scale leptogenesis,

    Roberta Calabrese, Marco Chianese, and Ninetta Sa- viano, “Impact of memory-burdened primordial black holes on high-scale leptogenesis,” Phys. Rev. D111, 083008 (2025), arXiv:2501.06298 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Could the KM3–230213A event be caused by an evaporating primordial black hole?

    Andrea Boccia and Fabio Iocco, “Could the KM3–230213A event be caused by an evaporating primordial black hole?” Phys. Rev. D112, 063045 (2025), arXiv:2502.19245 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Constraining the pa- rameters of heavy dark matter and memory-burdened primordial black holes with DAMPE electron measure- ments,

    Tian-Ci Liu, Ben-Yang Zhu, Yun-Feng Liang, Xiao- Song Hu, and En-Wei Liang, “Constraining the pa- rameters of heavy dark matter and memory-burdened primordial black holes with DAMPE electron measure- ments,” JHEAp47, 100375 (2025), arXiv:2503.13192 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Can a breakdown of Hawking evaporation open a new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter?

    Gabriele Montefalcone, Dan Hooper, Katherine Freese, Chris Kelso, Florian Kuhnel, and Pearl Sandick, “Can a breakdown of Hawking evaporation open a new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter?” Phys. Rev. D113, 023524 (2026), arXiv:2503.21005 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    High-energy gamma-ray emission from memory-burdened primordial black holes,

    Marco Chianese, “High-energy gamma-ray emission from memory-burdened primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D112, 023043 (2025), arXiv:2504.03838 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Neutrino fluence influenced by memory bur- dened primordial black holes,

    Arnab Chaudhuri, Koushik Pal, and Rukmani Mo- hanta, “Neutrino fluence influenced by memory bur- dened primordial black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B1026, 117438 (2026), arXiv:2505.09153 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Probing mem- ory–burdened primordial black holes with galactic sources observed by LHAASO,

    Xiu-hui Tan and Yu-feng Zhou, “Probing mem- ory–burdened primordial black holes with galactic sources observed by LHAASO,” Phys. Lett. B876, 140404 (2026), arXiv:2505.19857 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    The fast, the slow and the merg- ing: probes of evaporating memory burdened PBHs,

    Alessandro Dondarini, Giulio Marino, Paolo Panci, and Michael Zantedeschi, “The fast, the slow and the merg- ing: probes of evaporating memory burdened PBHs,” JCAP11, 006 (2025), arXiv:2506.13861 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Micro Black Hole Dark Matter,

    Manuel Ettengruber and Florian Kuhnel, “Micro Black Hole Dark Matter,” (2025), arXiv:2506.14871 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.