Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Coarse-graining deterministic event chains recovers unitary quantum field theory, a running Planck constant, and Einstein gravity from one minimal proper-time substrate.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:14 UTC pith:FRLO4F7F

load-bearing objection Coherent top-down story that ties the author's prior proper-time kernel to 1/n_μ and sketches Einstein IR geometry, but the load-bearing O(1) leakage + N^p growth scalings are postulated, not derived from any multi-dimensional F. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03605 v1 pith:FRLO4F7F submitted 2026-07-03 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Minimal Proper Time and Deterministic Microstates: Emergent Quantum Fields and Relativistic Spacetime

Alessio Maiezza This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords minimal proper timedeterministic microstatesemergent quantum fieldsrunning Planck constantcoarse-grainingemergent spacetimeNambu proper-timesuperdeterminism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a top-down microscopic origin for a previously proposed minimal-proper-time quantum field theory. It begins with a deterministic substrate of causally ordered events whose elementary updates define a fixed proper-time step. When an observer cannot resolve every micro-history, the growing equivalence classes of indistinguishable configurations induce an effective Nambu-like dynamics that includes a controlled ultraviolet dissipative correction and a scale-dependent Planck constant fixed by the unresolved fraction of histories. In the infrared the dissipation vanishes, standard unitary quantum field theory is recovered, and the same local cardinalities define a statistical metric whose macroscopic equations are Einstein’s under ordinary Lovelock assumptions. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction supplies a single statistical mechanism for the ultraviolet cutoff, the strength of quantum fluctuations, and the emergence of relativistic geometry, rather than inserting them by hand.

Core claim

Starting from bijective deterministic updates on pre-geometric event chains, coarse-graining into equivalence classes whose cardinality grows as n_μ ~ N^p with p > 1 produces an effective Nambu-Schrödinger evolution whose cumulative non-unitary leakage scales as N^{1-p} and therefore disappears at large proper time. The unresolved fraction 1 - 1/n_μ is identified with the effective Planck constant, fixing the proper-time cutoff kernel of the earlier bottom-up theory as the inverse growth of those classes. The same local cardinalities furnish a covariance metric that, after the Nambu constraint selects Lorentzian signature, yields Einstein gravity in the infrared by Lovelock’s theorem.

What carries the argument

The bulk growth law n_μ(N) ≃ N^p of coarse-grained equivalence classes together with bounded boundary leakage Δn_μ = O(1) per elementary step. This single scaling both washes out the dissipative correction for p > 1 and identifies the cutoff kernel with the inverse unresolved multiplicity 1/n_μ.

Load-bearing premise

The number of unresolved micro-histories inside each coarse-grained class must grow faster than linearly with the number of elementary steps, while the number that leak out of the class per step remains of order one.

What would settle it

Exhibit a local bijective update map on a finite event graph for which the bulk cardinality of the macroscopic classes grows only linearly or slower (p ≤ 1) while boundary leakage stays O(1); the cumulative dissipative factor then remains finite in the infrared, falsifying recovery of unitary QFT and the claimed matching of the cutoff kernel.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Unitary quantum field theory and ordinary canonical commutation relations appear only after the number of unresolved micro-histories becomes large.
  • The effective Planck constant runs toward zero near the minimal proper-time scale, classicalizing the deep ultraviolet.
  • Smooth spacetime and Einstein equations hold solely in the infrared; near unit cardinality the continuum description itself breaks down, kinematically avoiding classical singularities.
  • Residual non-linear and non-unitary corrections of order N^{1-p} may survive as suppressed intermediate-scale signatures.
  • Local variations of the class cardinality induce curved backgrounds and a spacetime-dependent effective Planck constant, reproducing the generator structure of quantum field theory on curved spacetime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the growth exponent is fixed by the effective dimension of the event network, precision tests of intermediate-scale unitarity or of the commutator could bound the microscopic topology.
  • The leakage current that sources a bulk-viscous early-universe term offers a concrete microphysical route to a primordial accelerated phase without an inflaton field.
  • Reproducing quantitative Bell correlations will require highly non-factorizable deterministic maps; their existence or non-existence decides whether the framework can accommodate genuine quantum non-locality.
  • The normalization that fixes the overall coefficient of the running Planck constant could be confronted with precision vacuum-polarization or Casimir data once the intermediate-scale profile is computed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a top-down deterministic substrate of causally ordered events updated by a bijective map F, whose elementary step is identified with a minimal proper time τ_min. Coarse-graining into equivalence classes of cardinality n_μ produces an effective Nambu-like dynamics: boundary leakage generates a UV dissipative correction that vanishes in the IR when n_μ ∼ N^p with p>1, recovering unitary QFT; the unresolved fraction 1−1/n_μ is identified with a running ħ_eff and matched to the proper-time cutoff kernel of the author’s prior bottom-up work; and weighted covariance of interwoven event chains supplies an emergent metric whose IR equations are Einstein’s under Lovelock assumptions. Two toy models (cyclic permutation; local cardinality geometry) illustrate pieces of the construction.

Significance. If the postulated scalings can be realized by a single bijective map that also supports multi-dimensional geometry, the framework would give a common deterministic origin for a minimal proper-time cutoff, scale-dependent quantization, and infrared Einstein gravity, and would promote the bottom-up kernel of Ref. [11] from an ansatz to a microscopic prediction. The paper is explicit about open problems (Bell correlations, realistic field content, intrinsic Lorentzian signature) and supplies concrete matching conditions (Sec. 4.2) and appendices that make the counting assumptions checkable. As a conceptual hep-th proposal it is therefore of potential interest, provided the load-bearing scalings are either derived or clearly delimited as inputs.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (34), (38)–(41); App. A] Sec. 4, Eqs. (34), (38)–(41): IR unitarity and the cumulative leakage N/n_μ ∼ N^{1−p} rest on two simultaneous assumptions—bulk growth n_μ(N) ≃ N^p with p>1 and boundary leakage Δn_μ = O(1) independent of n_μ. The text states that O(1) leakage follows from locality of F w.r.t. the coarse-graining, not bijectivity alone, and cites Appendix A. That toy model is a fixed-n cyclic permutation on three sectors; it never realizes power-law growth of n_μ with N, nor the chain-interweaving required for the multi-dimensional covariance metric of Eq. (72). Once F must mix distinct chains so that transverse geometry can emerge, the interface of an equivalence class generically grows with the bulk. The manuscript supplies no existence argument or counting bound showing that a single bijective F can keep Δn_μ = O(1) while generating n_μ ∼ N^5 (the value preferred after Eq. (87)). This pair of scalings
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (54), (58)–(64)] Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (54), (58)–(64): ħ_eff is defined as ħ(1−1/n_μ) (minimal counting model with Δn_μ=1). Matching to the bottom-up formula then forces a = 1/(4τ_min) and f̃(τ) = (τ_min/τ)^p by construction. The identification of the cutoff kernel with the inverse cardinality is therefore a definitional matching rather than an independent derivation. The paper is transparent that non-minimal Q(n_μ) would change the intermediate profile; still, the central claim that the bottom-up kernel “acquires a microscopic interpretation” should be stated as a matching condition under the minimal counting ansatz, not as a prediction independent of that ansatz.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (72), (79)–(83), (87)] Sec. 5, “Euclidean versus Lorentzian signature,” Eqs. (72), (79)–(83): the covariance construction yields a positive semi-definite (Riemannian) pre-metric; Lorentzian signature is obtained by a Wick rotation of the ordered coordinate after the Nambu constraint. The text correctly notes that a fully intrinsic derivation from the discrete network remains open. Because the physical metric and the subsequent appeal to Lovelock’s theorem (Eq. (87)) presuppose a Lorentzian smooth geometry, the signature step is load-bearing for the gravitational claim and should be flagged more sharply as an additional selection rule rather than as an emergent consequence of the covariance data alone.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5, remarks after Eq. (87)] After Eq. (87) the identification p ≃ d = 5 is imposed as a phenomenological matching to 4D+τ. This is fine as an input, but the wording “the underlying discrete network should then be characterized by p=5” can be read as a derivation; a single clarifying sentence that dimensionality is not dynamically selected would help.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (16)] Eq. (16) and the surrounding discussion of the arbitrary constant a are clear once Sec. 4.2 is reached, but an earlier forward pointer that a will be fixed by the top-down matching would reduce the impression of free parameters in Sec. 2.
  3. [Appendix A] Appendix A spectrum discussion: the eigenvalues of H′ are correctly labeled as pre-constraint λ-eigenvalues; a brief reminder that they are not ordinary energy levels (already present) could be moved earlier in the appendix for readers who stop at the matrix K.
  4. [Throughout / References] Typos/notation: “Schr¨ odinger” and similar accented forms appear inconsistently in the source; “Nambu-Schr¨ odinger” vs “Nambu-like” is used interchangeably—pick one primary term after first definition. Reference [11] is cited as Nucl. Phys. B 1025 (2026); confirm bibliographic details at production.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Top-down ħ_eff is defined so that matching to the author's own bottom-up formula forces the cutoff kernel to equal the inverse cardinality by construction.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (54), (58)–(64)]
    "We identify this active unresolved fraction with the effective strength of quantum fluctuations. In this sense, the effective quantization scale is taken to be ħ_eff(μ)=ħ(1−1/n_μ). We now match this top-down expression to the running Planck constant obtained in the bottom-up formulation 1/n_μ(τ)=4a τ_min f̃(τ) With this normalization, the matching condition becomes f̃(τ)=1/n_μ(τ). Thus the cutoff kernel of the bottom-up formulation is identified with the inverse cardinality of the coarse-grained equivalence class."

    ħ_eff is defined from the unresolved fraction 1−1/n_μ; equating it to the bottom-up formula of the same author’s prior paper immediately forces a=1/(4τ_min) and f̃=1/n_μ. The claimed microscopic interpretation of the kernel is therefore identical to the matching condition by construction, not an independent result.

  2. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. 2; Sec. 4.2 matching to Eq. (20) of Ref. [11]]
    "We develop a top-down counterpart of the minimal proper-time formulation of quantum field theory previously introduced as an effective bottom-up framework. Comparing Eq. (54) with Eq. (20), and working in the local rest frame where τ=t, one obtains the matching condition 1/n_μ(τ)=4a τ_min f̃(τ)."

    The entire target structure (running ħ_eff, dissipative correction, Nambu-like constraint) is taken from the author’s own prior paper [11]. The top-down construction is engineered to reproduce that structure via the matching above; without the self-cited bottom-up formulae there is no independent prediction of the kernel form.

  3. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4 after Eq. (38); remarks after Eq. (87)]
    "We assume a power-law scaling for the cardinality of the coarse-grained equivalence class n_μ(N)≃N^p. Rather than dynamically deriving the macroscopic dimensionality from first principles, we impose it as a phenomenological matching condition. If the target continuum limit is to describe our observable four-dimensional spacetime, augmented before the constraint by the proper-time parameter τ, the relevant pre-constraint effective dimensionality is d=5. The underlying discrete network should then be characterized by p=5."

    The exponent p that controls both IR unitarity (p>1) and the kernel decay is first assumed as a free power-law input, then set to the value 5 required to match the desired macroscopic dimensionality. The “prediction” that the dissipative term vanishes and that f̃∼(τ_min/τ)^5 is therefore fixed by the phenomenological choice of p rather than derived from the microscopic map.

full rationale

The paper's central interpretive claim—that the proper-time cutoff kernel of the prior bottom-up construction acquires a microscopic meaning as the inverse growth of unresolved histories—is obtained by defining ħ_eff(μ)=ħ(1−1/n_μ) and then imposing equality with the running-ħ expression of Ref. [11] (same lead author). The matching condition immediately fixes the free normalization a and identifies f̃(τ)=1/n_μ(τ)=(τ_min/τ)^p. This is a definitional identification, not an independent derivation. The power-law growth n_μ≃N^p (p>1) and the O(1) boundary-leakage assumption are additional free inputs needed for IR unitarity; p is later set to 5 by phenomenological matching to 4D+τ rather than derived. The geometric sector defines T_αβ as the response of the same effective energy and then invokes Lovelock under standard IR assumptions, which is not circular but also not a first-principles prediction. Overall the load-bearing “prediction” of the kernel form reduces to the matching construction itself, warranting a mid-range score; the rest of the framework is an explicit top-down counterpart rather than a closed self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a deterministic pre-geometric substrate, a power-law growth of equivalence classes with bounded boundary leakage, a specific identification of ħ_eff with the unresolved fraction, and the standard infrared hypotheses of Lovelock’s theorem. These are not derived from more primitive axioms; they are introduced to make the matching and the geometric emergence work. Free parameters (p, κ, Λ, ζ) remain phenomenological.

free parameters (4)
  • growth exponent p = 5 (phenomenological)
    Set by hand to p=5 to match pre-constraint dimensionality 4+1; controls both IR unitarity (p>1) and the power-law kernel.
  • macroscopic gravitational coupling κ
    Left as a free infrared parameter absorbing the normalization of the response definition of T_αβ.
  • cosmological constant Λ
    Appears in the Lovelock-selected equations; not fixed by the microscopic counting.
  • leakage normalization ζ
    Dimensionful constant controlling the intermediate-energy non-conservation of T_αβ; absorbed into the compensating tensor.
axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper There exists a bijective deterministic map F on a pre-geometric set of causally ordered events that interweaves distinct chains.
    Postulated in Sec. 3.1; no independent derivation or experimental handle is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary leakage per elementary step satisfies Δn_μ = O(1) while bulk cardinality grows as n_μ ∼ N^p with p>1.
    Stated after Eq. (34) and Eq. (38); required for IR unitarity and for the kernel to vanish.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective Planck constant is exactly ħ_eff = ħ(1 − 1/n_μ) (minimal counting model).
    Introduced in Eq. (54) as the ‘minimal choice’; other functions Q(n_μ) are acknowledged but discarded.
  • domain assumption In the infrared, locality, diffeomorphism covariance, second-order equations and no extra long-range tensors hold, so Lovelock’s theorem applies.
    Invoked in Sec. 5 to select Einstein gravity; standard but not derived from the discrete network.
  • ad hoc to paper The Nambu-like constraint plus microscopic ordering selects a Lorentzian signature via a dynamical Wick rotation.
    Sec. 5, ‘Euclidean versus Lorentzian signature’; the paper itself calls a fully intrinsic derivation an open problem.
invented entities (2)
  • pre-geometric substrate of causally ordered events with bijective update map F no independent evidence
    purpose: Supplies the deterministic microstates whose coarse-graining produces both quantum dynamics and geometry.
    No independent experimental signature is offered beyond the recovery of known IR physics.
  • coarse-grained equivalence classes whose cardinality n_μ controls both dissipation and ħ_eff no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the single statistical object that matches the bottom-up cutoff kernel and generates the metric weights.
    Defined by the coarse-graining map C_μ; growth law is postulated rather than measured.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30587 in / 3408 out tokens · 31521 ms · 2026-07-12T01:14:23.549691+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a top-down counterpart of the minimal proper-time formulation of quantum field theory previously introduced as an effective bottom-up framework. Starting from a deterministic pre-geometric substrate of causally ordered events, we show how coarse-graining over microscopic histories leads, at low energies, to an effective Nambu-like quantum dynamics. The elementary deterministic update is identified with the minimal proper-time step, while the growth of coarse-grained equivalence classes controls both the ultraviolet dissipative correction and the scale dependence of the effective quantization strength, encoded in a running Planck constant. In this way, the proper-time cutoff kernel of the bottom-up formulation acquires a microscopic interpretation as the inverse growth of unresolved deterministic histories. In the infrared limit, the dissipative term vanishes and standard unitary quantum field theory is recovered. The same coarse-grained structure also provides a natural setting for an emergent relativistic spacetime geometry, compatible in the macroscopic limit with Einstein gravity. The resulting picture suggests a common deterministic origin for minimal-scale structure, quantum behavior, and relativistic spacetime.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Feynman, R.P.: The theory of positrons. Phys. Rev.76, 749–759 (1949) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.76.749 37

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.76.749 1949

  2. [2]

    Nambu, Y.: The use of the Proper Time in Quantum Electrodynamics. Prog. Theor. Phys.5, 82–94 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.5.82

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.5.82 1950

  3. [3]

    Mead, C.A.: Possible Connection Between Gravitation and Fundamental Length. Phys. Rev.135, 849–862 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135.B849

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.135.b849 1964

  4. [4]

    International Jour- nal of Modern Physics A10(02), 145–165 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1142/ s0217751x95000085

    GARAY, L.J.: Quantum gravity and minimum length. International Jour- nal of Modern Physics A10(02), 145–165 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1142/ s0217751x95000085

    1995

  5. [5]

    Physical Review D52(2), 1108–1118 (1995) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.1108

    Kempf, A., Mangano, G., Mann, R.B.: Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation. Physical Review D52(2), 1108–1118 (1995) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.1108

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1108 1995

  6. [6]

    Padmanabhan, T.: Duality and zero point length of space-time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1854–1857 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1854 arXiv:hep- th/9608182

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.1854 1997

  7. [7]

    Classical and Quan- tum Gravity26(24), 242002 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/24/ 242002

    Modesto, L.: Fractal spacetime from the area spectrum. Classical and Quan- tum Gravity26(24), 242002 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/24/ 242002

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/24/ 2009

  8. [8]

    Physical Review D83(2) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.83

    Nicolini, P., Niedner, B.: Hausdorff dimension of a particle path in a quantum manifold. Physical Review D83(2) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.83. 024017

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.83 2011

  9. [9]

    Bosso, P., Petruzziello, L., Wagner, F.: Minimal length: A cut-off in disguise? Physical Review D107(12) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.126009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.126009 2023

  10. [10]

    The European Physical Journal C84(9) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-13281-9

    Bosso, P.: Minimal-length quantum field theory: a first-principle approach. The European Physical Journal C84(9) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-13281-9

    doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2024

  11. [11]

    Maiezza, A., Vasquez, J.C.: Minimal proper-time in quantum field theory. Nucl. Phys. B1025, 117409 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117409 arXiv:2602.00045 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117409 2026

  12. [12]

    Hatfield, B.: Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings, (1992)

    1992

  13. [13]

    Fun- damental Theories of Physics, vol

    Hooft, G.: The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Fun- damental Theories of Physics, vol. 185. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6 2016

  14. [14]

    Hossenfelder, S.: A possibility to solve the problems with quantizing gravity. Phys. Lett. B725, 473–476 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.07. 037 arXiv:1208.5874 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.07 2013

  15. [15]

    JCAP09, 015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2018/09/015 arXiv:1804.05176 [gr-qc]

    Ong, Y.C.: Generalized Uncertainty Principle, Black Holes, and White Dwarfs: A 38 Tale of Two Infinities. JCAP09, 015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2018/09/015 arXiv:1804.05176 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2018

  16. [16]

    $\hbar$ as parameter of Minkowski metric in effective theory

    Volovik, G.E.: h-bar as parameter of Minkowski metric in effective theory. JETP Lett.90, 697–704 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364009230027 arXiv:0904.1965 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1134/s0021364009230027 2010

  17. [17]

    Cambridge University Press, ??? (2004)

    Adler, S.L.: Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon: The Statisti- cal Mechanics of Matrix Models as the Precursor of Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, ??? (2004)

    2004

  18. [18]

    Physics Physique Fizika1(3), 195 (1964)

    Bell, J.S.: On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika1(3), 195 (1964)

    1964

  19. [19]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics27(2), 219–226 (1988)

    Brans, C.H.: Bell’s theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables. International Journal of Theoretical Physics27(2), 219–226 (1988)

    1988

  20. [20]

    Hooft, G.: Determinism in free bosons. Int. J. Theor. Phys.42, 355–361 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024459703072 arXiv:hep-th/0104080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1023/a:1024459703072 2003

  21. [21]

    Palmer, T.N.: The Invariant Set Hypothesis: A New Geometric Framework for the Foundations of Quantum Theory and the Role Played by Gravity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A465, 3187–3207 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0080 arXiv:0812.1148 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0080 2009

  22. [22]

    Hall, M.J.W.: Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 250404 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.250404 arXiv:1007.5518 [quant-ph]. [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 219902 (2016)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.250404 2010

  23. [23]

    Hossenfelder, S., Palmer, T.N.: Rethinking Superdeterminism. Front. in Phys.8, 139 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00139 arXiv:1912.06462 [quant-ph]

    doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00139 2020

  24. [24]

    Donadi, S., Hossenfelder, S.: Toy model for local and deterministic wave-function collapse. Phys. Rev. A106(2), 022212–102221214 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.106.022212 arXiv:2010.01327 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Hooft, G.: Fast Vacuum Fluctuations and the Emergence of Quantum Mechan- ics. Found. Phys.51(3), 63 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00464-7 arXiv:2010.02019 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00464-7 2021

  26. [26]

    Hooft, G.: Deterministic Quantum Mechanics: The Mathematical Equations. Front. in Phys.8, 253 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00253 arXiv:2005.06374 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00253 2020

  27. [27]

    Powers, S., Stojkovic, D.: An alternative formalism for modeling spin. Eur. Phys. J. C82, 690 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10652-y 39 arXiv:2110.13617 [physics.gen-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10652-y 2022

  28. [28]

    Nature Phys.18, 1382 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-022-01831-5 arXiv:2211.01331 [quant-ph]

    Hance, J.R., Hossenfelder, S.: Bell’s theorem allows local theories of quan- tum mechanics. Nature Phys.18, 1382 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-022-01831-5 arXiv:2211.01331 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Universe10(1), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010047 arXiv:2308.11262 [quant-ph]

    Palmer, T.: Superdeterminism without Conspiracy†. Universe10(1), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10010047 arXiv:2308.11262 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/universe10010047 2024

  30. [30]

    Arroyo, E.A.: A family of deterministic models for singlet quantum state cor- relations. J. Phys. A58(24), 245301 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ ade104 arXiv:2408.09579 [quant-ph]

    doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ 2025

  31. [31]

    Dvali, G., Gomez, C.: Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait. Fortsch. Phys.61, 742– 767 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201300001 arXiv:1112.3359 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.201300001 2013

  32. [32]

    De Angelis, M., Montani, G.: On the emergence of a classical isotropic uni- verse from a quantum f(R) Bianchi cosmology in the Jordan frame. Eur. Phys. J. C83(4), 285 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11454-6 arXiv:2207.14683 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11454-6 2023

  33. [33]

    JHEP08, 198 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2025)198 arXiv:2311.12102 [hep-th]

    Abel, S., Heurtier, L.: Exact Schwinger Proper Time Renormalisation. JHEP08, 198 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2025)198 arXiv:2311.12102 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)198 2025

  34. [34]

    Bonanno, A., Oglialoro, G., Zappal` a, D.: Gauge and parametrization dependence of quantum Einstein gravity within the proper time flow. Phys. Rev. D112(2), 026002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/sht5-sf25 arXiv:2504.07877 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/sht5-sf25 2025

  35. [35]

    Bonanno, A.M., Glaviano, E.M., Vacca, G.P.: Proper-time functional renormal- ization in O(N) scalar models coupled to gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C86(5), 450 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15635-x arXiv:2508.00807 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15635-x 2026

  36. [36]

    Giacometti, G., Rizzo, D., Zappala, D.: Universal content of the proper time flow in scalar and Yang-Mills theories. Phys. Rev. D113(4), 045020 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1103/dsgp-mlkp arXiv:2510.04896 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/dsgp-mlkp 2026

  37. [37]

    Physics Letters A143(1-2), 1–2 (1990)

    Gisin, N.: Weinberg’s non-linear quantum mechanics and supraluminal commu- nications. Physics Letters A143(1-2), 1–2 (1990)

    1990

  38. [38]

    Ong, Y.C.: A critique on some aspects of GUP effective metric. Eur. Phys. J. C83(3), 209 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11360-x arXiv:2303.10719 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11360-x 2023

  39. [39]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics12(3), 498–501 (1971)

    Lovelock, D.: The einstein tensor and its generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Physics12(3), 498–501 (1971)

    1971

  40. [40]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics13(6), 874–876 (1972) 40

    Lovelock, D.: The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor. Journal of Mathematical Physics13(6), 874–876 (1972) 40

    1972

  41. [41]

    International journal of theoretical physics28(9), 927–933 (1989)

    Prigogine, I.: Thermodynamics and cosmology. International journal of theoretical physics28(9), 927–933 (1989)

    1989

  42. [42]

    Physical Review D8(12), 4231 (1973) 41

    Murphy, G.L.: Big-bang model without singularities. Physical Review D8(12), 4231 (1973) 41

    1973