Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 43 references

Tellurium sublattice instability driven amorphization in the chalcogenide AgSbTe2 under pressure

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pressure amorphizes AgSbTe2 by destabilizing the tellurium sublattice rather than cation vacancies, and decompression rate selects glass or crystal on release.

desk verdict Solid multi-run XRD + DFT/MD paper that cleanly reassigns the high-P phase of AgSbTe2 and ties PIA to Te-sublattice motion rather than vacancies; the rate-dependent recovery is real, the adiabatic-heating story is not yet measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04200 v1 pith:EZG2EZLI submitted 2026-07-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Baihong Sun , Zihan Zhang , Wei Luo , Sergei Grazhdannikov , Wenting Lu , Shiyu Feng , Haikai Zou , Chenxin Wei
show 7 more authors
Martin Kunz Hirokazu Kadobayashi Bihang Wang Azkar Saeed Ahmad Yaron Amouyal Rajeev Ahuja Elissaios Stavrou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords pressure-inducedamorphizationAgSbTe2telluriumsublatticechalcogenidehigh-pressureXRDdensityfunctionaltheorymoleculardynamicskineticeffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that AgSbTe2 turns amorphous under pressure because its tellurium atoms become positionally unstable, not because of missing cations as earlier work assumed. Synchrotron diffraction tracks a clean sequence: ambient rhombohedral R-3m collapses near 19 GPa into a long-lived amorphous state, then recrystallizes above about 37 GPa into a fully disordered cubic Im-3m solid solution that survives to 60 GPa. Calculations find the two crystalline structures stay nearly equal in enthalpy over a wide pressure window, so the lattice loses long-range order instead of jumping cleanly from one crystal to the other. On decompression the rate decides the fate: slow release freezes the glass, while rapid release restores the original crystal. The result supplies a vacancy-independent, Te-driven pathway for pressure-induced amorphization that is directly relevant to phase-change and thermoelectric chalcogenides.

What carries the argument

Te-sublattice displacement instability plus R-3m/Im-3m enthalpy near-degeneracy. Progressive, disordered Te displacements raise coordination and erase long-range order while the cation framework stays relatively intact; the near-equal enthalpies keep the material amorphous until the thermodynamic driving force for recrystallization peaks.

What would settle it

An in-situ temperature record or a cold, rapid-decompression experiment that still recovers the ambient R-3m crystal would falsify the adiabatic-heating account of the kinetic effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Pressure-induced amorphization of AgSbTe2 is governed by a pronounced displacement instability of the Te sublattice, not by cation vacancies. Near-degeneracy of the enthalpies of the ambient R-3m and high-pressure Im-3m structures over a broad pressure range forces the system through an extended amorphous intermediate before a fully disordered cubic solid solution forms. The decompression pathway is rate-dependent in a counterintuitive sense: slow release yields glass while rapid release recovers crystalline R-3m.

Load-bearing premise

The explanation that rapid decompression restores the crystal because the material heats itself through its poor thermal conductivity has never been checked by measuring temperature during unload.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Amorphization in related I-V-VI2 and phase-change tellurides can occur without engineered cation vacancies.
  • Stress-driven Te displacements become a design handle for reversible crystal-glass transitions in thermoelectric and memory materials.
  • Once formed, the fully disordered Im-3m solid solution is kinetically stabilized even when the enthalpy difference later shrinks.
  • Recovery of the ambient crystal by fast unload implies that thermal spikes can anneal the structure during decompression in poor thermal conductors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Te-driven collapse may operate in other anharmonic chalcogenides, especially under non-hydrostatic stress, helping explain scatter in reported transition pressures.
  • If adiabatic heating is real, controlled thermal-pulse experiments during unload should map a critical cooling rate that separates glass retention from crystal recovery.
  • Te-Te partial pair-distribution functions alone could serve as a practical experimental fingerprint for vacancy-independent pressure-induced amorphization across multi-element tellurides.
  • The negligible volume change between phases points to continuous, second-order-like disordering that alloying could widen or narrow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a high-pressure structural study of AgSbTe2 up to 60 GPa using multi-run synchrotron XRD (Ne PTM), DFT enthalpies/EoS, and ab initio MD. It documents a sequence R-3m o extended amorphous intermediate (≈19–37 GPa) o fully disordered cubic Im-3m (A2), with recrystallization near the pressure of maximum R-3m/Im-3m enthalpy difference. Amorphization is attributed to Te-sublattice displacement instability (bond equalization, partial Te–Te RDF broadening/splitting) rather than cation vacancies. On decompression, three independent runs show a strong rate dependence: slow unload yields amorphous product; abrupt unload recovers crystalline R-3m. The kinetic pathway is ascribed to adiabatic heating enabled by the material’s poor thermal conductivity and low crystallization temperature.

Significance. If the structural sequence and Te-driven mechanism hold, the work supplies a vacancy-independent route to pressure-induced amorphization in a chemically complex chalcogenide that is relevant to both thermoelectric and phase-change materials. The multi-facility XRD with quasi-hydrostatic Ne, Le Bail EoS, DFT enthalpy near-degeneracy, and MD partial RDFs form a coherent, falsifiable chain that revises earlier B1/B2 assignments and vacancy-based interpretations. The rate-dependent recovery is experimentally clear and counter to the Si literature; even if the adiabatic-heating interpretation needs refinement, the observation itself is of interest for stress-driven disorder and quench pathways.

major comments (2)
  1. Discussion, “Kinetic effect upon decompression”: The three-run experimental rate dependence (Figs. 3a–c) is clear, but the mechanistic claim that rapid unload crystallizes via adiabatic heating from poor thermal conductivity is unsupported by measurement. No unload thermometry, ΔT estimate, or temperature-controlled decompression is reported. The low crystallization T (≈75–100 °C) is cited but does not establish that rapid pressure release actually produces that temperature rise. This is load-bearing for the “counterintuitive kinetic effect” half of the strongest claim; either provide a quantitative estimate / control experiment or reframe the claim as an experimental observation whose thermal pathway remains to be tested.
  2. Methods (DFT/MD) and Results (DFT/MD): The experimentally fully disordered Im-3m solid solution is represented by a partially disordered Pm-3m 2 imes2 imes2 supercell (DFT) and an ordered Fm-3m supercell (MD). While the authors note the difficulty of simulating full disorder, the enthalpy near-degeneracy (Fig. 4) and the MD recovery of amorphous product on slow unload both depend on this proxy. A short sensitivity check (e.g., alternative site-occupancy patterns or larger disordered cells) or an explicit statement of the approximation’s limitations would strengthen the claim that Te displacements, not model artifacts, drive the amorphization.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: high-pressure sequence, Te-sublattice mechanism and enthalpy near-degeneracy are independent of the ambient-structure self-citation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction / Methods (AgSbTe2 specimen)]
    "the R 3m space group symmetry was positively identified. ... The same material as in Ref. [13] was used in this study. More information about materials synthesis can be found in Ref. [13]."

    Ambient starting structure is justified solely by the authors’ own prior APL paper on the identical specimen. This is ordinary self-citation of an input structure determination and does not force or redefine the high-pressure PIA, Te-instability or kinetic claims, which rest on independent new data; hence only a minor, non-central circularity.

full rationale

The load-bearing claims (PIA onset ~19–20 GPa, extended amorphous intermediate, recrystallization to fully disordered Im-3m, Te-displacement instability from partial RDFs/bond equalization, and R-3m/Im-3m enthalpy near-degeneracy) are derived from new synchrotron XRD patterns under Ne PTM, Le Bail lattice parameters, Birch–Murnaghan EoSs, and parameter-free DFT/MD (VASP PBE, on-the-fly MLFF NPT trajectories). Ambient R-3m is taken from the authors’ prior identification of the identical specimen (Ref. [13]), which is a legitimate structural input, not a self-definitional or uniqueness step that forces the high-pressure mechanism. No fitted parameters are re-labeled as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and the kinetic-rate observation is experimental (three independent unload pathways) rather than circular. The adiabatic-heating interpretation of the rate effect is an untested hypothesis, not a circular derivation. Score remains 1 solely for the non-load-bearing ambient self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism claim rests on standard high-pressure crystallography and DFT/MD practice plus a few modeling choices for disorder and an unmeasured thermal interpretation of kinetics. No new particles or forces are invented. Free parameters are ordinary EoS and computational settings; the main domain assumptions are PBE adequacy, supercell proxies for solid-solution disorder, quasi-hydrostatic Ne, and the heating-under-fast-unload story.

free parameters (4)
  • Third-order Birch–Murnaghan bulk moduli and EoS parameters for R-3m and Im-3m
    Fitted to experimental volume–pressure points (Fig. 2, Table S1); used to compare volumes and support negligible volume change across the transition.
  • DFT plane-wave cutoff (600 eV) and k-spacing (0.03 2π/Å)
    Chosen computational settings that control enthalpy differences between R-3m and the modeled high-pressure phase.
  • MD simulation length (30 ps), timestep (1 fs), and supercell sizes (3×3×1 R-3m; 2×2×2 Fm-3m proxy)
    Finite sampling and cell choices that determine whether Te polyhedra disorder or recover in the trajectories used to support the Te-instability claim.
  • Partial site occupancies in Im-3m model (Ag 0.25, Sb 0.25, Te 0.5)
    Assumed solid-solution composition used to interpret the high-pressure phase as fully disordered A2.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT enthalpies and forces are sufficiently accurate to rank R-3m vs disordered BCC-like phases and to track bond-length evolution under pressure.
    Invoked throughout DFT Results and Discussion for near-degeneracy and coordination change.
  • ad hoc to paper A partially disordered Pm-3m 2×2×2 supercell (DFT) and an ordered Fm-3m supercell (MD) adequately represent the experimentally fully disordered Im-3m solid solution.
    Methods and DFT section explicitly adopt these proxies because fully random solid solutions are hard to simulate.
  • domain assumption Neon remains quasi-hydrostatic to ≥50 GPa so that observed critical pressures reflect intrinsic material behavior rather than non-hydrostatic stress.
    Used to explain differences from prior oil/methanol–ethanol studies (Discussion).
  • ad hoc to paper Rapid decompression of poorly conducting AgSbTe2 raises sample temperature enough to crystallize the amorphous intermediate (supported by low reported crystallization T ≈75–100 °C).
    Core interpretive step for the counterintuitive kinetic effect; not directly measured.
  • domain assumption Ambient structure is R-3m as established for this specimen in the authors’ prior work.
    Starting point for all compression paths (Introduction, Methods).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tellurium sublattice instability driven amorphization in the chalcogenide AgSbTe2 under pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZG2EZLI

@misc{pith2026260704200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tellurium sublattice instability driven amorphization in the chalcogenide AgSbTe2 under pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZG2EZLI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04200}
}
read the original abstract

Pressure provides a powerful thermodynamic route to access hidden structural states in functional materials, yet the microscopic origin of pressure-induced amorphization remains elusive in many complex chalcogenides. Here we report a detailed high-pressure structural study of AgSbTe2,combining synchrotron X-ray diffraction with density functional theory and molecular dynamics calculations up to 60 GPa. We uncover a pressure-driven transformation from the ambient R-3m phase to a fully disordered cubic Im3m phase, through an extended intermediate amorphous state. Enthalpy calculations reveal a near-degeneracy between the R3m and Im3m structures over a broad pressure range, dictating amorphization. Contrary to previously speculated cation vacancies, the amorphization is governed by a pronounced displacement instability of the Te sublattice. Remarkably, the time dependent decompression pathway controls the final structural state, resulting in either amorphous (slow decompression) or fully crystalline (fast decompression) states, indicative of a strong counterintuitive kinetic effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Selected XRD patterns, in scattering vector Q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Selected XRD patterns, in scattering vector Q range, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. FIG. 6. Crystal structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) The final structures derived from MD simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Total RDF of the (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The exchange- correlation functional is specified as the generalized gradient approximation [39] parameterized by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof [40]

    Density functional theory Ab−initioDFT calculations were carried using the Vi- enna simulation package (VASP 6) [38]. The exchange- correlation functional is specified as the generalized gradient approximation [39] parameterized by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof [40]. For high pressure EoS and phase transition, the valence electrons of the 4p64d 105s 1, 4d ...

  2. [2]

    An orderedF m 3msuperstructure was used to model the disordered solid solution phaseIm 3m

    Molecular dynamics Ab−initioMD simulations were carried at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 GPa using on-the-fly machine learning force fields [41], where the 3×3×1 and 2×2×2 supercells were used for orderedR 3mphase andF m 3mphase, re- spectively. An orderedF m 3msuperstructure was used to model the disordered solid solution phaseIm 3m. Va- lence electrons of th...

  3. [3]

    S. M. Sharma and S. Sikka, Pressure induced amorphiza- tion of materials, Progress in Materials Science40, 1 (1996)

    1996

  4. [4]

    Machon, F

    D. Machon, F. Meersman, M. Wilding, M. Wilson, and P. McMillan, Pressure-induced amorphization and polyamorphism: Inorganic and biochemical systems, Progress in Materials Science61, 216 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Arora, Pressure-induced amorphization versus decom- position, Solid State Communications115, 665 (2000)

    A. Arora, Pressure-induced amorphization versus decom- position, Solid State Communications115, 665 (2000)

    2000

  6. [6]

    Z. Sun, J. Zhou, Y. Pan, Z. Song, H.-K. Mao, and R. Ahuja, Pressure-induced reversible amorphization and an amorphous-amorphous transition in Ga 2Sb2Te5 phase-change memory material, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 10410 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Caravati, M

    S. Caravati, M. Bernasconi, T. D. K¨ uhne, M. Krack, and M. Parrinello, Unravelling the mechanism of pressure in- duced amorphization of phase change materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 205502 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    K. Xu, X. Miao, and M. Xu, The structure of phase- change chalcogenides and their high-pressure behavior, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters13, 1800506 (2019)

    2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    M. Xu, W. Zhang, R. Mazzarello, and M. Wuttig, Disor- der control in crystalline GeSb 2Te4 using high pressure, Advanced Science2, 1500117 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    M. N. Schneider, T. Rosenthal, C. Stiewe, and O. Oeck- ler, From phase-change materials to thermoelectrics?, Z. Krist.225, 10.1524/zkri.2010.1320 (2010)

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    Matsunaga, N

    T. Matsunaga, N. Yamada, R. Kojima, S. Shamoto, M. Sato, H. Tanida, T. Uruga, S. Kohara, M. Takata, P. Zalden, G. Bruns, I. Sergueev, H. C. Wille, R. P. Her- mann, and M. Wuttig, Phase-change materials: Vibra- tional softening upon crystallization and its impact on thermal pro...

    2011

  4. [12]

    Taneja, S

    V. Taneja, S. Das, K. Dolui, T. Ghosh, A. Bhui, U. Bhat, D. K. Kedia, K. Pal, R. Datta, and K. Biswas, High ther- moelectric performance in phonon-glass electron-crystal like AgSbTe2, Adv. Mater.36, 2307058 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Y. Amouyal, On the role of lanthanum substitution defects in reducing lattice thermal conductivity of the AgSbTe2 (P4/mmm) thermoelectric compound for en- ergy conversion applications, Comput. Mater. Sci.78, 98 8 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Y. Amouyal, Reducing lattice thermal conductivity of the thermoelectric compound AgSbTe 2 (P4/mmm) by lanthanum substitution: Computational and experimen- tal approaches, Journal of Electronic Materials43, 3772 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    B. Sun, S. Grazhdannikov, M. Dawod, L. He, J. Hao, T. Meier, Y. Yao, Y. Amouyal, and E. Stavrou, On the ambient conditions crystal structure of AgSbTe 2, Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 151905 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    A. V. Kolobov, J. Haines, A. Pradel, M. Ribes, P. Fons, J. Tominaga, Y. Katayama, T. Hammouda, and T. Uruga, Pressure-induced site-selective disordering of Ga 2Sb2Te5: A new insight into phase-change optical recording, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 035701 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    R. S. Kumar, A. L. Cornelius, E. Kim, Y. Shen, S. Yoneda, C. Chen, and M. F. Nicol, Pressure induced structural phase transition in AgSbTe2, Phys. Rev. B72, 060101 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Ko, M.-W

    Y.-H. Ko, M.-W. Oh, J. K. Lee, S.-D. Park, K.-J. Kim, and Y.-S. Choi, Structural studies of AgSbTe 2 under pressure: Experimental and theoretical analyses, Curr. Appl. Phys.14, 1538 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    C. Lin, X. Liu, D. Yang, X. Li, J. S. Smith, B. Wang, H. Dong, S. Li, W. Yang, and J. S. Tse, Temperature- and rate-dependent pathways in formation of metastable sili- con phases under rapid decompression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 155702 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Ma, Y. Li, G. Li, X. Shao, H. Wang, T. Cui, X. Wang, and P. Zhu, Electronic topological transition in Ag 2Te at high-pressure, Sci. Rep.5, 14681 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys

    F. Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys. Rev. 71, 809 (1947)

    1947

  14. [22]

    F. Sun, W. Hong, X. He, C. Jian, Q. Ju, Q. Cai, and W. Liu, Synthesis of ultrathin topological insulatorβ- Ag2Te and Ag 2Te/WSe2-based high-performance pho- todetector, Small19, 2205353 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    L. Zhu, H. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Lv, Y. Ma, Q. Cui, Y. Ma, and G. Zou, Substitutional alloy of Bi and Te at high pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 145501 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Klotz, J

    S. Klotz, J. Chervin, P. Munsch, and G. Le Marchand, Hydrostatic limits of 11 pressure transmitting media, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.42, 075413 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Dai, H. Hu, M. Hong, and C. Li, Pressure- induced reversible structural phase transitions and met- allization in GeTe under hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic environments up to 22.9 GPa, J. Non-Cryst. Solids618, 122516 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    P. Shen, Q. Li, H. Zhang, R. Liu, B. Liu, X. Yang, Q. Dong, T. Cui, and B. Liu, Raman and IR spectro- scopic characterization of molybdenum disulfide under quasi-hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic conditions, Phys. Status Solidi B254, 1600798 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    L. Yang, J. Jiang, L. Dai, H. Hu, M. Hong, X. Zhang, H. Li, and P. Liu, High-pressure structural phase tran- sition and metallization in Ga 2S3 under non-hydrostatic and hydrostatic conditions up to 36.4 GPa, J. Mater. Chem. C9, 2912 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Ferlat, A

    G. Ferlat, A. P. Seitsonen, M. Lazzeri, and F. Mauri, Hid- den polymorphs drive vitrification in B 2O3, Nat. Mater. 11, 925 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Loa, J.-W

    I. Loa, J.-W. Bos, R. A. Downie, and K. Syassen, Atomic ordering in cubic bismuth telluride alloy phases at high pressure, Phys. Rev. B93, 224109 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Detemple, D

    R. Detemple, D. Wamwangi, M. Wuttig, and G. Bihlmayer, Identification of te alloys with suit- able phase change characteristics, Appl. Phys. Lett.83, 2572 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. Barnett, and R. Forman, Calibration of the pressure dependence of the R1 ruby fluorescence line to 195 kbar, J. Appl. Phys.46, 2774 (1975)

    1975

  24. [32]

    O. L. Anderson, D. G. Isaak, and S. Yamamoto, An- harmonicity and the equation of state for gold, J. Appl. Phys.65, 1534 (1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    M. Kunz, A. MacDowell, W. Caldwell, D. Cambie, R. Ce- lestre, E. Domning, R. Duarte, A. Gleason, J. Glossinger, N. Kelez, D. Plate, T. Yu, J. Zaug, H. Padmore, R. Jean- loz, A. Alivisatos, and S. Clark, A beamline for high- pressure studies at the advanced light source with a ...

    2005

  26. [34]

    Hirao, S

    N. Hirao, S. I. Kawaguchi, K. Hirose, K. Shimizu, E. Ohtani, and Y. Ohishi, New developments in high- pressure x-ray diffraction beamline for diamond anvil cell at spring-8, Matter. Radiat. at Extremes5, 018403 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Prescher and V

    C. Prescher and V. B. Prakapenka, Dioptas: a program for reduction of two-dimensional x-ray diffraction data and data exploration, High Pres. Res.35, 223 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Kraus and G

    W. Kraus and G. Nolze,POWDER CELL– a program for the representation and manipulation of crystal struc- tures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder pat- terns, J. Appl. Crystallogr.29, 301 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Gonzalez-Platas, M

    J. Gonzalez-Platas, M. Alvaro, F. Nestola, and R. Angel, EosFit7-GUI: a new graphical user interface for equa- tion of state calculations, analyses and teaching, J. Appl. Crystallogr.49, 1377 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Boultif and D

    A. Boultif and D. Lou¨ er, Powder pattern indexing with the dichotomy method, J. Appl. Crystallogr.37, 724 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    B. H. Toby and R. B. Von Dreele, Gsas-ii: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package, J. Appl. Cryst.46, 544 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and Y. Wang, Generalized gra- dient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system, Phys. Rev. B54, 16533 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    Jinnouchi, J

    R. Jinnouchi, J. Lahnsteiner, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, and M. Bokdam, Phase transitions of hybrid perovskites sim- ulated by machine-learning force fields trained on the fly with bayesian inference, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 225701 (2019). C. Acknowledgments The work performed at GTII...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.